Welcome to the State Water Resources Control Board Welcome to the California Environmental Protection Agency
Governor's Website Visit the Water Board Members Page
Agendas
My Water Quality
Performance Report

The California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year 2009-10

TARGETS AND RESOURCES: REGION 7 COLORADO RIVER

Display a PDF version of this page for easy printing
GROUP: TARGETS AND RESOURCES - REGION 7
MEASURE: ALL REGIONAL TARGETS
ALL RESOURCES

 

MEASUREMENTS
INSPECTIONS AND PERMITS

Region 7 Facilities
Regulated
Inspections Permits Issued
(not including revised and rescinded)
Enforcement
Actions
Program
Budget ($)
Staff
(PY)
Program Actual Target % Target Actual Target % Target
NPDES MAJOR 8 10 9 111% 4 5 80% 95 $209,932 1.8
NPDES MINOR
(including general enrollees)
58 24 1 2400% 2 1 200%
STORMWATER CONSTRUCTION 150 80 100 80% 58 NA NA 0 $167,862 2.1
STORMWATER INDUSTRIAL 163 0 20 0% 5 NA NA 36
STORMWATER MUNICIPAL 20 0 4 0% 0 NA NA 0
WASTE DISCHARGE
REQUIREMENTS
242 8 50 16% 1 5 20% 4 $328,375 4.6
LAND DISPOSAL 75 64 25 256% 3 5 60% 1 $406,749 4.0
ALL OTHER PROGRAMS 248 0 22 0 $409,425 4.2
TOTAL 964 186 95 136 $1,522,343 16.7

 

OTHER TARGETS

Region 7 FY 09-10 Actual Target FY 09-10 % TARGET
1 Plan & Assess
# of combinations added/removed from 303(d) list (impaired waters) 26 0 NA
# of Implementation Provisions Adopted 9 4 225%
# of pollutant/waterbody combinations addressed 2 0 NA
# of SWAMP analyses conducted 358 358 100%
# of SWAMP Site Visits 10 10 100%
# of Total Maximum Daily Loads Adopted 2 1 200%
# of Use Attainability Analysis Adopted 0 1 0%
# of Water Quality Objectives Adopted 0 2 0%
2 Regulate  
# of groundwater cleanup cases moved to remediation or interim remediation 2 6 33%
# of Site Cleanup Program sites projected closed 1 2 50%
# of Underground Storage Tank sites projected closed 5 4 125%
3 Enforcement  
MMP Violations Not Addressed Within 18 Months of Discovery (as of June 30, 2010) 143 0  

 

RESOURCES (INPUTS)

 

 

 

WHAT THE CARD IS SHOWING

Each target card provides a direct comparison of actual outputs for FY 2009-10 to the target estimates established at the outset of the fiscal year. While budgetary and personnel information is not directly aligned with the activities being assessed, it does provide a basis for understanding the relative priority of key programs within each region and across the State. For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases. This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. Notably, the data portrayed include entries completed through July 15, 2010 and do not reflect data input after that period. In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases. This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

WHY THIS CARD IS IMPORTANT

Beginning with FY 2009-10, performance targets were established for certain output measures. Targets are goals that establish measurable levels of performance to be achieved within a specified time period. This card demonstrates how the resources of the region are being deployed to protect water quality. As with any first year effort, the ability to accurately estimate targeted levels of activity is a learning process. For this first year, the Regional Water Boards considered the unique differences and needs within their respective watersheds, their work priorities given available resources, external factors such as furloughs, and prior year outputs.

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

  • Target arrows: Red; less than 85% of target met, yellow, target met between 85% and 100%, green; target met at 100% or above.
  • All other programs include: Timber Harvest, Non point Source, 401 Certification, Tanks, Pretreatment, Recycling and miscellaneous programs (for budget information).
  • Other Programs (budget): miscellaneous programs not included in the above.
  • Permits issued: Does not include rescissions or permit revisions that may have been included in the targets.

REGIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

    Site Cleanup & Underground Storage Tank Programs
    • Funding may include Cleanup and Abatement Account project funds that do not contribute to staff resources.

( Updated 9/20/11 )

 
 

.