[an error occurred while processing this directive]

The California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year 2009-10

TARGETS AND RESOURCES: REGION 2 SAN FRANCISCO BAY

Display a PDF version of this page for easy printing

 

GROUP: TARGETS AND RESOURCES - REGION 2
MEASURE: ALL REGIONAL TARGETS
ALL RESOURCES

MEASUREMENTS
INSPECTIONS AND PERMITS

Region 2 Facilities
Regulated
Inspections Permits Issued
(not including revised and rescinded)
Enforcement
Actions
Program
Budget ($)
Staff
(PY)
Program Actual Target % Target Actual Target % Target
NPDES MAJOR 55 55 55 100% 6 8 75% 37 $1,337,033 15.1
NPDES MINOR
(including general enrollees)
228 5 6 83% 72 12 600%
STORMWATER CONSTRUCTION 592 54 70 77% 240 NA NA 19 $991,726 11.3
STORMWATER INDUSTRIAL 1,334 44 110 40% 63 NA NA 232
STORMWATER MUNICIPAL 99 25 10 250% 1 NA NA 1
WASTE DISCHARGE
REQUIREMENTS
66 16 5 320% 0 0 NA 4 $345,320 2.6
LAND DISPOSAL 82 65 45 144% 3 4 75% 3 $322,629 3.2
ALL OTHER PROGRAMS 400 41 4 7 $1,457,048 13.0
TOTAL 2,856 305 389 303 $4,453,756 45.2

 

OTHER TARGETS

Region 2 FY 09-10
Actual
Target
FY 09-10
% TARGET
1 Plan & Assess
# of combinations added/removed from 303(d) list (impaired waters) 44 0 NA
# of Implementation Provisions Adopted 21 12 175%
# of pollutant/waterbody combinations addressed 1 1 100%
# of SWAMP analyses conducted 330 228 145%
# of SWAMP Site Visits 103 26 396%
# of Total Maximum Daily Loads Adopted 1 1 100%
# of Use Attainability Analysis Adopted 0 0 NA
# of Water Quality Objectives Adopted 1 1 100%
2 Regulate  
# of groundwater cleanup moved to remediation or interim remediation 8 25 32%
# of Site Cleanup Program sites projected closed 29 20 145%
# of Underground Storage Tank sites projected closed 66 30 220%
3 Enforcement  
Mandatory Minimum Penalty Violations Not Addressed Within 18 Months of Discovery (as of June 30, 2010) 252 0  

 

RESOURCES (INPUTS)

 

 

WHAT THE CARD IS SHOWING

Each target card provides a direct comparison of actual outputs for FY 2009-10 to the target estimates  established at the outset of the fiscal year.  While budgetary and personnel information is not directly aligned with the activities being assessed, it does provide a basis for understanding the relative priority of key programs within each region and across the State. For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy.  Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs.  In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases.  This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy.  Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs.  Notably, the data portrayed include entries completed through July 15, 2010 and do not reflect data input after that period.  In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases.  This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

WHY THIS CARD IS IMPORTANT

Beginning with FY 2009-10, performance targets were established for certain output measures. Targets are goals that establish measurable levels of performance to be achieved within a specified time period. This card demonstrates how the resources of the region are being deployed to protect water quality. As with any first year effort, the ability to accurately estimate targeted levels of activity is a learning process. For this first year, the Regional Water Boards considered the unique differences and needs within their respective watersheds, their work priorities given available resources, external factors such as furloughs, and prior year outputs.

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

REGIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

( Updated 12/6/10 ) This page is being tracked by Google Analytics

 
 

.