[an error occurred while processing this directive]

The California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year 2009-10

TARGETS AND RESOURCES: REGION 5 CENTRAL VALLEY

Display a PDF version of this page for easy printing
GROUP: TARGETS AND RESOURCES - REGION 5
MEASURE: ALL REGIONAL TARGETS
ALL RESOURCES

 

MEASUREMENTS
INSPECTIONS AND PERMITS

Region 5 Facilities
Regulated
Inspections Permits Issued
(not including revised and rescinded)
Enforcement
Actions
Program
Budget ($)
Staff
(PY)
Program Actual Target % Target Actual Target % Target
NPDES MAJOR 56 67 48 140% 8 13 62% 239 $1,899,995 18.6
NPDES MINOR
(including general enrollees)
275 51 17 300% 24 18 133%
STORMWATER CONSTRUCTION 1,203 521 550 95% 515 NA NA 115 $963,181 10.3
STORMWATER INDUSTRIAL 1,900 47 77 61% 94 NA NA 710
STORMWATER MUNICIPAL 99 2 3 67% 1 NA NA 2
WASTE DISCHARGE
REQUIREMENTS
1,006 404 325 124% 23 14 164% 463 $3,014,679 31.9
LAND DISPOSAL 265 179 76 236% 7 13 54% 27 $2,305,433 24.4
ALL OTHER PROGRAMS 3,495 99 106 26 $5,578,221 53.2
TOTAL 8,299 1,370 778 1,582 $13,761,509 138.4

 

OTHER TARGETS

Region 5 FY 09-10 Actual Target FY 09-10 % TARGET
1 Plan & Assess
# of combinations added/removed from 303(d) list (impaired waters) 434 421 103%
# of Implementation Provisions Adopted 20 3 667%
# of pollutant/waterbody combinations addressed 8 30 27%
# of SWAMP analyses conducted 3,341 2,801 119%
# of SWAMP Site Visits 811 717 113%
# of Total Maximum Daily Loads Adopted 1 2 50%
# of Use Attainability Analysis Adopted 0 0 NA
# of Water Quality Objectives Adopted 4 6 67%
2 Regulate  
# of groundwater cleanup sites new in active remediation 84 57 147%
# of Site Cleanup Program sites projected closed 31 18 172%
# of Underground Storage Tank sites projected closed 142 120 118%
3 Enforcement  
MMP Violations Not Addressed Within 18 Months of Discovery (as of June 30, 2010) 342 0  

 

RESOURCES (INPUTS)

 

 

 

WHAT THE CARD IS SHOWING

Each target card provides a direct comparison of actual outputs for FY 2009-10 to the target estimates  established at the outset of the fiscal year.  While budgetary and personnel information is not directly aligned with the activities being assessed, it does provide a basis for understanding the relative priority of key programs within each region and across the State. For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy.  Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs.  In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases.  This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy.  Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs.  Notably, the data portrayed include entries completed through July 15, 2010 and do not reflect data input after that period.  In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases.  This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

WHY THIS CARD IS IMPORTANT

Beginning with FY 2009-10, performance targets were established for certain output measures. Targets are goals that establish measurable levels of performance to be achieved within a specified time period. This card demonstrates how the resources of the region are being deployed to protect water quality. As with any first year effort, the ability to accurately estimate targeted levels of activity is a learning process. For this first year, the Regional Water Boards considered the unique differences and needs within their respective watersheds, their work priorities given available resources, external factors such as furloughs, and prior year outputs.

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

REGIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

( Updated 12/6/10 ) This page is being tracked by Google Analytics

 
 

.