The California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year 2011-12
ENFORCE: WASTE DISCHARGE TO LAND – WDR |
|
| GROUP: |
All OTHER WASTE FACILITIES |
|
MEASURE: COMPLIANCE RATES-2011 |
| MESSAGE: |
The Regional Boards documented one or more violations for
of facilities in calendar year 2011. |
|
| KEY STATISTICS FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2011 |
|
MEASUREMENTS
| Region |
Regulated
Facilities |
No. of Facs. With Compliance Assessed |
Facs. with No Violations |
No. of Facilities with 1-10 Violations |
No. of Facilities with 11-25 Violations |
No. of Facilities with > 25 Violations |
No. of Facilities with Violations |
Number of Violations |
Percentage of Facilities in Violation |
Average No. of Violations per Facility in Violation |
|
| Region |
No. of Facs. With Compliance Assessed |
Facs. with Priority I Violations |
Priority I Violations |
Facs. with Priority II Violations |
Priority II Violations |
Facs. with Priority III Violations |
Priority III Violations |
Facs. with Priority Violations Un-determined |
Priority Violations Un-determined |
Percentage of Facilities with Priority Violations |
|
WHAT THE MEASURE IS SHOWING
| Compliance rates vary significantly among regions. This variation may be in response to several factors including compliance actions and compliance assurance activities conducted in each year. It is significant to point out that only 2 facilities documented violations classified as Class I for enforcement priority. None of the less, the variation in data suggest inconsistencies in data entry and violation documentation across the Regional Boards. |
|
WHY THIS MEASURE IS IMPORTANT
The mission of compliance and enforcement programs is to ensure that compliance with the laws and regulations is achieved and maintained over time. Compliance rates inform the public about efforts of the regulated community and the work of government agencies. Compliance rates assist managers to describe and identify noncompliance problems in magnitude, frequency and duration and also help the evaluation of the enforcement program effectiveness.
Compliance rates provide valuable insight into programs, but it is important to understand variables influencing the rate. Rates can vary depending on inspection protocols and methodology (whether inspections are announced or unannounced, targeted on problem facilities, etc.). How rates are calculated and what data are included (or excluded) are equally important. For example, including all violations in the calculation gives a very different rate than just including significant violations. These variables need to be understood when the rate is used and included with any presentation. While not a perfect measure, compliance rates are considered an outcome measure for the enforcement program and are more constructive than relying on activity and output counts alone. Reporting compliance rates is required in section 13225 (e) of the California Water Code and is identified in the 2010 water quality enforcement policy as one of the 9 key recommended performance measure for Water Boards’ enforcement programs.
TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS
GLOSSARY
- Compliance Rate
- The number of facilities with one or more documented violation during the reporting period divided by the total number of facilities for which compliance has been assessed.
- Compliance Assessment
- Compliance assessment is any activity conducted by Water Board staff, USEPA, or contractors working for the Water Boards that evaluates the compliance with requirements established by Water Boards actions. Compliance activities mainly include reviewing self-monitoring reports submitted by dischargers and inspections of the facilities and/or operations of the regulated community.
- Class I Priority Violations
- Class I priority violations are those violations that pose an immediate and substantial threat to water quality and that have the potential to cause significant detrimental impacts to human health or the environment. Violations involving recalcitrant parties who deliberately avoid compliance with water quality regulations and orders are also considered class I priority violations because they pose a serious threat to the integrity of the Water Boards’ regulatory programs.
- Class II Priority Violations
- Class II priority violations are those violations that pose a moderate, indirect, or cumulative threat to water quality and, therefore, have the potential to cause detrimental impacts on human health and the environment. Negligent or inadvertent noncompliance with water quality regulations that has the potential for causing or allowing the continuation of an unauthorized discharge or obscuring past violations is also a class II priority violation.
- Class III Priority Violations
- Class III priority violations are those violations that pose only a minor threat to water quality and have little or no known potential for causing a detrimental impact on human health and the environment. Class III priority violations include statutorily required liability for late reporting when such late filings do not result in causing an unauthorized discharge or allowing one to continue. Class III priority violations should only include violations by dischargers who are first time or infrequent violators and are not part of a pattern of chronic violations. Class III priority violations are all violations that are not class I priority or class II priority violations.
- All other facilities
- All facilities that treat and/or dispose of wastes that do not fall into one of the Municipal, Industrial and Agricultural Waste categories. It does not include dairies or other Confined Animal Facilities (CAFO), or any sanitary sewer (SSO) regulated under Statewide Sanitary Sewer Order (ORDER NO. 2006-0003-DWQ).
- Waste Discharge Requirements Program
- The Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) Program regulates all point source discharges of waste to land that do not require full containment (which falls under the Land Discharge Program), or are not subject to the NPDES Program.
