The California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year 2011-12

INSPECTIONS AND PERMITS  - Data last updated on: 

Region 8 (Santa Ana) Regional Considerations	Facilities Regulated	Facilities Inspected			Permits Issued, Revised and Renewed			Enforcement (Compliance & Penalty Actions)	Budget	Staff (PY)
Program		Actual	Target	% Target	Actual	Target	% Target
NPDES Major Individual	22	16	20	80%	1	8	13%	4	$973,479	8.4
NPDES Minor Individual	11	6	4	150%	1	4	25%	2
NPDES Minor General Enrollees	282	2	0	NA	2	0	NA	13
Stormwater Construction	1052	572	600	95%	463	0	NA	2	$1,473,402	13.4
Stormwater Industrial	1531	349	200	175%	91	0	NA	0
Stormwater Municipal	56	20	9	222%	66	0	NA	0
Waste Discharge to Land, Municipal Waste	36	31	21	148%	0	5	40%	0	$255,077	2.6
Waste Discharge to Land, Industrial Waste	16	2	5	40%	0			0
Waste Discharge to Land, All Other Facilities	29	0	1	0%	2			0
Land Disposal Landfills	27	21	30	70%	1	2	50%	0	$417,523	3.4
Land Disposal All Other	30	15	10	150%	1	0	NA	0	$0	0.0
Timber Harvest	0	0	0	NA	0	0	NA	0	$0	0.0
Confined Animal Facilities	150	92	0	NA	0	0	NA	0	$0	0.0
All Other Programs	951	8			0			0	$690,367	6.5
TOTAL	4,193	1,134			628			21	$3,809,848	34.3

OTHER TARGETS

RESOURCES (INPUTS)

WHAT THE CARD IS SHOWING

Each target card provides a direct comparison of actual outputs for FY 2009-10 to the target estimates established at the outset of the fiscal year. While budgetary and personnel information is not directly aligned with the activities being assessed, it does provide a basis for understanding the relative priority of key programs within each region and across the State. For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases. This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. Notably, the data portrayed include entries completed through July 15, 2010 and do not reflect data input after that period. In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases. This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

WHY THIS CARD IS IMPORTANT

Beginning with FY 2009-10, performance targets were established for certain output measures. Targets are goals that establish measurable levels of performance to be achieved within a specified time period. This card demonstrates how the resources of the region are being deployed to protect water quality. As with any first year effort, the ability to accurately estimate targeted levels of activity is a learning process. For this first year, the Regional Water Boards considered the unique differences and needs within their respective watersheds, their work priorities given available resources, external factors such as furloughs, and prior year outputs.

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

• Target arrows: = Less than 80% of target met
  = Target met between 80% and 90%
  = Target met at 90% or above.
• All other programs include: Timber Harvest, Non point Source, 401 Certification, Tanks, Pretreatment, Recycling and miscellaneous programs (for budget information).
• Other Programs (budget): miscellaneous programs not included in the above.
• Permits issued: Does not include rescissions or permit revisions that may have been included in the targets
• Target Definitions FY 2011-2012

REGIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

( Page last updated:  10/12/12 )