Welcome to the State Water Resources Control Board Welcome to the California Environmental Protection Agency
Governor's Website Visit the Water Board Members Page
Agendas
My Water Quality
Performance Report
PERFORMANCE REPORT The Water Boards...

State Water Board Logo

The California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year 2012-13

TARGETS AND RESOURCES: REGION 8 - SANTA ANA


Targets Achieved
GROUP:  TARGETS AND RESOURCES - REGION 8 MEASURE: ALL REGIONAL TARGETS
ALL RESOURCES
Target arrows: = Less than 80% of target met
= Target met between 80% and 90%
= Target met at 90% or above

 

INSPECTIONS AND PERMITS  - Data last updated on: 

Region 8 (Santa Ana)
Regional Considerations
Facilities
Regulated
Facilities
Inspected
Permits Issued, Revised and Renewed Enforcement (Compliance & Penalty Actions) Budget Staff (PY)
Program Actual Target % Target Actual Target  % Target 
NPDES Major Individual 22 15 13 115% 4 10 40% 0 $1,031,296 8.9
NPDES Minor Individual 11 6 5 120% 2 0 NA 0
NPDES Minor General Enrollees 125 1 0 NA 13 0 NA 0
Stormwater Construction 911 490 265 185% 364 0 NA 0 $1,597,101 13.4
Stormwater Industrial 1580 254 189 134% 138 0 NA 3
Stormwater Municipal 62 10 4 250% 0 0 NA 0
Waste Discharge to Land, Municipal Waste 36 11 10 110% 0 5 40% 1 $319,728 2.8
Waste Discharge to Land, Industrial Waste 10 2 0 NA 0 0
Waste Discharge to Land, All Other Facilities 20 0 0 NA 2 0
Land Disposal Landfills 27 22 30 73% 1 2 50% 0 $518,741 3.7
Land Disposal All Other 30 16 10 160% 0 1 0% 0 $0 0.0
Timber Harvest 0 0 0 NA 0 0 NA 0 $0 0.0
Confined Animal Facilities 143 82 0 NA 0 0 NA 2 $0 0.0
All Other Programs 0 4 0 0 $404,889 3.4
TOTAL 2,977 913 524 6 $3,871,755 32.2

 

OTHER TARGETS

Region 8 (Santa Ana) Actual
FY 12-13
Target
FY 12-13
%
Target
Plan and Assess

 

RESOURCES (INPUTS)

 

 

WHAT THE CARD IS SHOWING

Each target card provides a direct comparison of actual outputs for FY 2009-10 to the target estimates established at the outset of the fiscal year. While budgetary and personnel information is not directly aligned with the activities being assessed, it does provide a basis for understanding the relative priority of key programs within each region and across the State. For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases. This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. Notably, the data portrayed include entries completed through July 15, 2010 and do not reflect data input after that period. In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases. This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

 

WHY THIS CARD IS IMPORTANT

Beginning with FY 2009-10, performance targets were established for certain output measures. Targets are goals that establish measurable levels of performance to be achieved within a specified time period. This card demonstrates how the resources of the region are being deployed to protect water quality. As with any first year effort, the ability to accurately estimate targeted levels of activity is a learning process. For this first year, the Regional Water Boards considered the unique differences and needs within their respective watersheds, their work priorities given available resources, external factors such as furloughs, and prior year outputs.

 

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

  • Target arrows: = Less than 80% of target met
    = Target met between 80% and 90%
    = Target met at 90% or above.
  • All other programs include: Timber Harvest, Non point Source, 401 Certification, Tanks, Pretreatment, Recycling and miscellaneous programs (for budget information).
  • Other Programs (budget): miscellaneous programs not included in the above.
  • Permits issued: Does not include rescissions or permit revisions that may have been included in the targets
  • Target Definitions FY 2011-2012

 

REGIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

No Regional Considerations Provided.

( Page last updated:  9/17/13 )

 
 

.
Region 8 (Santa Ana) FY 12-13
Budget ($)
Staff (PY) %Fees/Taxes
Penalties
%Federal %General
Fund/Other
%Bonds