The California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year 2013-14
GROUP: |
LAND DISPOSAL. CLOSED LANDFILLS NOT RECEIVING WASTE |
|
MEASURE: |
NUMBER OF PERMITS ADOPTED OR RENEWED
NUMBER OF PERMITS PAST RENEWAL DATE |
|
MESSAGE: |
More than 70% of closed landfill facilities regulated are current with the permit review cycle. |
|
|
MEASUREMENTS
|
FusionCharts will load here
|
FusionCharts will load here
WHAT THE MEASURE IS SHOWING
Although there is significant variation between the Regional Water Boards, on average 70% of the closed landfill facilities regulated under the Land Disposal Program are operating under current permit provisions and do not need their requirements to be revised and updated. A total of 26 permits were issued or updated during FY 2013-14.
WHY THIS MEASURE IS IMPORTANT
The Land Disposal program establishes the required frequency for permit revision based on the classification of the facilities and their threat to water quality. Permit revision frequency are typically every 5, 10 and 15 years with the highest threat being reviewed every 5 years. Revising and reissuing permits for Land Disposal facilities require a significant amount of time and resources and constitutes a good indicator of overall program performance. Landfills represent a higher threat to water quality.
TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS
GLOSSARY
- Land Disposal
- The Land Disposal program regulates of waste discharge to land for treatment, storage and disposal in waste management units. Waste management units include waste piles, surface impoundments, and landfills. California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 23, (Chapter 15) contains the regulatory requirements for hazardous waste. CCR Title 27, contains the regulatory requirements for wastes other than hazardous waste.
- Review/Update Actions
- The Waste Discharge Requirements WDRs are to be reviewed according to a schedule based upon their TTWQ Category as follows: TTWQ 1= Every 5 years, TTWQ 2= Every 10 years and TTWQ 3= Every 15 years. TTWQ 1 has the highest priority. There are three possible actions which may result from the WDR review/update process: rescission, continuance, or revision. A revision requires the issuance of a new WDR with a new adoption date. No formal Regional Board action is required to continue WDRs without change. A memorandum signed by the Regional Board Executive Officer (EO), documenting that the review concluded that the existing WDR is appropriate and that no changes are necessary at this time, is placed in the WDR file.