Welcome to the State Water Resources Control Board Welcome to the California Environmental Protection Agency
Governor's Website Visit the Water Board Members Page
Agendas
My Water Quality
Performance Report
1415PERFORMANCE REPORT The Water Boards...

State Water Board Logo

The California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year 2014-15

PLAN AND ASSESS: TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD

GROUP:  TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS
MEASURE:  NEW TMDL PROJECTS ADOPTED
RECONSIDERED TMDL PROJECTS ADOPTED
LISTINGS NEWLY ADDRESSED BY NEW OR RECONSIDERED TMDL PROJECTS ADOPTED
LISTINGS READDRESED BY RECONSIDERED TMDL PROJECTS ADOPTED
LISTINGS ADDRESSED BY DELISTING
MESSAGE: 
KEY STATISTICS FOR FY 2014-15

 

MEASUREMENTS  - Data last updated on: 

 

 

WHAT THE MEASURE IS SHOWING

In Fiscal Year (FY) 2014-15, the Regional Water Boards adopted one new Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) project, which addresses water quality issues for 12 impaired waterbody listings, and four reconsidered TMDL projects, which address water quality issues for 37 impaired waterbody listings. Since the early 1990s, the Water Boards have adopted 194 new TMDL projects and 20 reconsidered TMDL projects, which have addressed 1,383 unique listings. However, as of July 1, 2015, 2,106 listings on the Water Boards' 2010 Clean Water Act Section 303(d) List of Impaired Waterbodies (303(d) List) remain to be addressed.

In FY 2014-15, the Regional Water Boards removed no listings from the (303(d) List); however the Regional Water Boards did work on 34 TMDLs in development, which will address 267 impaired waterbody listings when adopted in a future FY.

 

WHY THIS MEASURE IS IMPORTANT

When it is determined that a waterbody is not meeting its water quality standards, the waterbody is put on the state's list of impaired waters, called the 303(d) List. The Clean Water Act requires that a TMDL be developed for all impaired waterbodies to restore them to conditions that meet their water quality objectives and support their beneficial uses. TMDL projects are adopted by the Regional Water Boards and the State Water Board. Each TMDL project is subject to USEPA approval. The complexity of each TMDL project developed by the Regional Water Board varies greatly depending on the extent, type, and sources of pollution. Development and adoption of TMDLs requires an extensive public and stakeholder process, and requires significant resources. These measures show the number of listings addressed, and the number of associated new and reconsidered TMDL projects adopted, by the Regional Boards, during the FY.

Waterbodies are placed on the 303(d) List with the ultimate goal of restoring a waterbody's water quality and removing the listing. Delisting considerations include a public and stakeholder process and requires significant Water Board Resources. For each delisting, the Regional Water Board compiles and reviews all readily available data to assess a waterbody's water quality condition, as consistent with the Water Boards' Water Quality Control Policy for Developing California's Clean Water Act Section 303(d) List (Listing Policy). Delistings are adopted by the Regional Water Board and the State Water Board. Each delisting decision is subject to USEPA approval. This measure shows the number of listings the Regional Water Boards recommended for delisting, or removal from the 303(d) List, during the FY.

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

  • Data Source: TMDL Planner/Tracker Database. Period: July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2015. Extracted in August 2015.
    • California TMDL Program Status Summary Report Fiscal Year 2014-2015.
  • Unit of Measure: Number of TMDL projects adopted, or under development, during the fiscal year, and the number of 303(d) listings associated with the TMDL projects.
  • Data Definitions: TMDL Projects Adopted: The number of TMDL projects adopted by the Regional Water Board during the FY. TMDL Projects include new USEPA approved TMDLs, or USEPA approved alternatives to TMDLs (category 4b projects), or reconsideration of existing USEPA approved TMDLs, or USEPA approved alternatives to TMDLs, that will enact the necessary control actions to restore water quality. Listings Addressed by TMDL Project Adoptions: The number of waterbody-pollutant combinations associated with the TMDL projects adopted during the FY.
  • References: Information on the Water Boards' TMDL activities
    Water Boards' 2010 Clean Water Act Section 303(d) List of Impaired Waterbodies (303(d) List)

GLOSSARY

303(d) Listing (Impaired Water)
A 303(d) listings is a waterbody-pollutant combination that is responsible for the impairment as specified on the Clean Water Act Section 303(d) List of Impaired Waterbodies (i.e., each waterbody-pollutant combination is called a listing). If a single waterbody is impaired by multiple pollutants, the waterbody will have multiple listings, one for each pollutant. The geographic extent of a listing may vary from a small segment of a stream to an entire watershed. The current TMDL projects and listings are documented in the Water Boards' 2010 Clean Water Act Section 303(d) List of Impaired Waterbodies.

Pollutant
A pollutant is a waste or substance that, at certain levels, can cause waterbody impairment. The monitoring programs of the Water Boards and others provide information on the levels of pollutants in the State's waters.

TMDL
A mathematical calculation of the assimilative capacity of a specific waterbody for a specific pollutant, and the allocation of acceptable levels of the pollutant load to the sources of the pollutants.

TMDL Project
A TMDL project is a planned strategy to reduce pollution in an impaired waterbody so that its water quality standards are met. A TMDL project may address more than one or more waterbody-pollutant combinations for a given waterbody or segment of waterbody (known as 303(d) listings). A TMDL project includes the development of the TMDL, and TMDL implementation plan, or a USEPA approved alternatives to TMDLs, category 4b projects. A TMDL is comprised of a calculation of the maximum amount of a pollutant that the waterbody can receive and still meet water quality standards (i.e., waterbody's assimilative capacity); an allocation of acceptable pollutant loading to the various sources of the pollutant; and in California, an implementation plan for restoring water quality. A category 4b project is an alternative approach that implements pollution control requirements (e.g., best management practices) that is stringent enough to implement applicable water quality standards within a reasonable period of time.

( Page last updated:  10/12/15 )

 
 

.