The California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year 2015-16

State Board | Region 1 | Region 2 | Region 3 | Region 4 | Region 5 | Region 6 | Region 7 | Region 8 | Region 9

TARGETS AND RESOURCES: REGION 3 CENTRAL COAST

GROUP: TARGETS AND RESOURCES - REGION 3

MEASURE: ALL REGIONAL TARGETS
ALL RESOURCES

Targets Achieved:
• = Less than 60% of target met
• = Target met between 60% and 80%
• = Target met at 80% or above

Central Coast Regional Water Board Performance Summary¹	Your Page Does not Support iFrames Percentage of Targets Met
Area: 11493 square miles	Budget: $9,759,644	Staff: 65.2
Permitting 0% •	Inspections 75% •	Others 71% •
¹Regional Board performance summary statistics show the percentage of targets met.

Total Maximum Daily Load and Basin Planning
Program Budget: $1,579,230	Program Staff: 11.80
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
Pollutant/Water Body Combinations Addressed	23	31	135% •
Total Maximum Daily Loads Adopted	3	2	67% •
Basin Plan Amendments Adopted	0	1
No Regional Considerations Provided

NPDES Wastewater
Program Budget: $319,625	Program Staff: 2.20
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
Major Individual Permits Issued or Renewed	6	1	17% •
Major Individual Facilities Inspected	15	13	87% •
Minor Individual Permits Issued or Renewed	5	0	0% •
Minor Individual Facilities Inspected	7	6	86% •
Minor General Facilities Inspected	0	1
No Regional Board Considerations Provided

NPDES Stormwater
Program Budget: $678,229	Program Staff: 4.70
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
Municipal (Phase I/II Inspections)	11	7	64% •
Construction Inspections	20	34	170% •
Industrial Inspections	19	24	126% •
No Regional Considerations Provided

Waste Discharge to Land - Wastewater
Program Budget: $1,127,879	Program Staff: 7.80
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
Waste Discharge to Land Inspections	44	56	127% •
Individual Waste Discharge Requirements Updated	25	7	28% •
No Regional Considerations Provided

Land Disposal
Program Budget: $370,627	Program Staff: 2.60
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
Landfill Individual Permits Updated	2	1	50% •
Landfill Inspections	42	36	86% •
All Other Individual Permits Updated	0	0
All Other Inspections	5	1	20% •
In response to increasing climate change related disasters like forest fires and floods in California, Central Coast Water Board staff per direction from the Executive Officer developed Conditional Waiver of Waste Discharge Requirements for Disaster Related Emergency Waste Handling and Disposal Within the Central Coast Region (Order No. R3-2016-0001) to facilitate timely emergency waste cleanup and disposal activities to protect public health and water quality. The development of the conditional waiver is consistent with Division of General Services Debris Management Committee recommendations to address disaster related cleanup response needs and is consistent with the development of similar regulatory instruments by Regions 5, 6, 8 and 9. At the time the decision was made to develop the conditional waiver, it was determined that it was a regional priority over the development or update of an individual landfill permit as identified as a FY 15/16 performance target for Region 3.

Confined Animal Facilities (WDR, NPDES, etc.)
Program Budget: $0	Program Staff: 0.00
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
Confined Animal Facilities Inspections	0	1
No Regional Considerations Provided

Timber Harvest (Forestry)
Program Budget: $0	Program Staff: 0.00
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
Timber Harvest Inspections	0	0
No Regional Considerations Provided

Enforcement
Program Budget: $153,257	Program Staff: 1.00
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
Class 1 Priority Violations will Result in Formal Enforcement or an Investigative Order Pursuant to Water Code Section 13267 within 18 Months of Discovery	100%	100%	100% •
Facilities with Over $12,000 in MMPs (4 or More Violations) Not Assessed within 18 Months of Accrual	0	1	•
No Regional Board Considerations Provided

Cleanup
Program Budget: $998,225	Program Staff: 5.80
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
New Department of Defense Sites Into Active Remediation	0	10
New Cleanup Sites Into Active Remediation	2	2	100% •
Cleanup Sites Closed	8	13	163% •
New Underground Storage Tank Sites Into Active Remediation	6	1	17% •
Underground Storage Tank Sites Projected Closed	30	33	110% •
No Regional Considerations Provided

RESOURCES (INPUTS)

WHAT THE CARD IS SHOWING

Each target card provides a direct comparison of actual outputs for the fiscal year (July 1st to June 30th) to the target estimates established at the outset of the fiscal year. While budgetary and personnel information is not directly aligned with the activities being assessed, it does provide a basis for understanding the relative priority of key programs within each region and across the State. For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases. This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. Notably, the data portrayed include entries completed before November 4, 2014 and may not reflect data input after that period.

WHY THIS CARD IS IMPORTANT

Beginning with FY 2009-10, performance targets were established for certain output measures. Targets are goals that establish measurable levels of performance to be achieved within a specified time period. This card demonstrates how the resources of the region are being deployed to protect water quality. In establishing the targets, the Regional Water Boards considered the unique differences and needs within their respective watersheds, their work priorities given available resources, external factors such as furloughs, and prior year outputs.

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Target circles: • = Less than 60% of target met
• = Target met between 60% and 80%
• = Target met at 80% or above.
Other Programs (budget): miscellaneous programs not included in the above.
Permits issued: Does not include rescissions, amendments or permit revisions that may have been included in the targets.

REGIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

Regional Considerations provided in tables above under each program section.

( Page last updated: 5/16/16 )

Region 3 (Central Coast)	FY 2015-16 Budget ($)	Staff (PY)	%Fees/Taxes Penalties	%Federal	%General Fund/Other	%Bonds