Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Revolon Slough below Laguna Road is determined to be tidally influenced based on the study: "Calleguas Creek Watershed Boron, Chloride, TDS, and Sulfate TMDL Public Review Technical Report" by Larry Walker Associates, April, 2007. |
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Basin Plan Amendment (Resolution R4-2007-016) states that: "The segment of Reach 4 below Laguna Road is tidally influenced and therefore not impaired for chloride, boron, sulfate, and TDS." This amendment was based on the study: "Calleguas Creek Watershed Boron, Chloride, TDS, and Sulfate TMDL Public Review Technical Report" by Larry Walker Associates, April, 2007. |
|
DECISION ID |
5509 |
|
Pollutant: |
DDT (tissue & sediment) |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed with USEPA approved TMDL) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)(2006) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Sources: |
Agriculture-storm runoff | Atmospheric Deposition | Irrigated Crop Production | Nonpoint Source | Source Unknown | Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers |
TMDL Name: |
Calleguas Creek Historic Pesticides (AU #5) |
TMDL Project Code: |
358 |
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA: |
01/01/2005 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Weight of Evidence: |
This pollutant is being considered for removal on the section 303(d) list under sections 2.2 and 4.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 4.1 of the Policy, a minimum of one line of evidence is needed to assess listing status. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list and placing it in the Being Addressed portion of the 303(d) because a TMDL has been completed and approved by RWQCB and USEPA and is expected to result in attainment of the standards.
This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. 3 of 3 samples exceeded the NAS fish tissue guidance for DDT and these exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy.
4. 3 of 4 samples exceeded the California Toxics Rule Criterion Continuous Concentration for DDT for the protection of freshwater aquatic life and these exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy.
5. The Total Maximum Daily Load for Toxicity, Chlorpyrifos, and Diazinon in Calleguas Creek, Its Tributaries, and Mugu Lagoon was approved by the Region Board in 2005 and approved by USEPA on November 27, 2005.
6. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
|
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded and be placed in the Water Quality Limited Segments Being Addressed category of the section 303(d) list because a TMDL has been approved. |
|
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation: |
After review of the available information for this recommendation, SWRCB staff conclude that the water body pollutant combination should be placed in the Water Quality Limited Segments Being Addressed category of the section 303(d) list because a TMDL has been approved. |
|
USEPA Decision: |
|
|
|
|
LOE ID: |
2014 |
|
Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Tissue |
Matrix: |
Tissue |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms |
|
Number of Samples: |
3 |
Number of Exceedances: |
3 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Fish tissue analysis |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Three out of 3 samples exceeded (note: Fillet sample of goldfish exceeded OEHHA screening value in 1992). A total of 3 whole fish composite samples of flathead minnow were collected. Flathead minnow samples were collected in 1993-94 and 1997. The guideline was exceeded in all samples (TSMP, 2002). |
Data Reference: |
Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Los Angeles RWQCB Basin Plan: Toxic pollutants shall not be present at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic life to levels which are harmful to aquatic life or human health. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
1000 ng/g NAS Guideline (whole fish) |
Guideline Reference: |
Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) |
|
Spatial Representation: |
One station located below concrete apron just downstream of Woods Road. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected annually from 1993-94 and 1997. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Toxic Substances Monitoring Program 1992-93 and 1994-95 Data Reports.
Environmental Chemistry Quality Assurance and Data Report for the Toxic Substances Monitoring Program,1996-2000. Department of Fish and Game |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
|
LOE ID: |
21461 |
|
Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Freshwater Replenishment | Preservation of Rare & Endangered Species | Wetland Habitat | Wildlife Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
4 |
Number of Exceedances: |
3 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Three of four samples exceeded the California Toxics Rule Citerion Continuous Concentration for DDT. Water quality samples were taken and analyzed for DDT in accordance with Los Angeles Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Monitoring and testing parameters. |
Data Reference: |
Monitoring Reports for the Storm Water Management/Urban Runoff Discharges for Ventura County Flood Control District, County of Ventura, and the cities of Ventura County NPDES Permit No. CAS004002
|
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Toxics Rule lists a freshwater Criterion Continuous Concentration of 0.001 ug/L for DDT for the protection of aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The Ventura County Watershed Protection District sampled and measured DDT at the receiving monitoring station W-4 in Revolon Slough at Wood Road. |
Temporal Representation: |
Four composite samples were taken in February 2003 2004, and October 2004 and 2005. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data was collected in compliance with the sampling and monitoring procedures detailed in NPDES Permit No. No. CAS004002 Monitoring and Reporting Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Monitoring and reporting program No. CI 7388 for Storm Water Management/Urban Runoff Discharges for Ventura County Flood Control District,
County of Ventura, and the cities of Ventura County NPDES Permit No. CAS004002
|
|
DECISION ID |
7140 |
|
Pollutant: |
ChemA (tissue) |
Final Listing Decision: |
List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Sources: |
Agriculture-storm runoff |
TMDL Name: |
Calleguas Creek Historic Pesticides (AU #5) |
TMDL Project Code: |
358 |
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA: |
03/24/2006 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Weight of Evidence: |
This pollutant is being considered for removal on the section 303(d) list under sections 2.2 of the Listing Policy. Under 2.2 of the Policy, a minimum of one line of evidence is needed to assess listing status.
Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list. There is sufficient justification to place it in the Being Addressed portion of the 303(d) list because a TMDL has been completed and adopted by the Los Angeles RWQCB and approved by USEPA, and is expected to result in attainment of the standard. |
|
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the Water Quality Limited Segments Being Addressed category of the section 303(d) list because a TMDL has been approved by USEPA, and applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem. |
|
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation: |
|
|
USEPA Decision: |
|
|
|
Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 7140 |
|
LOE ID: |
2017 |
|
Pollutant: |
ChemA (tissue) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Tissue |
Matrix: |
Tissue |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Not Specified |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. |
Data Reference: |
Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
|
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
|
Temporal Representation: |
|
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
QA Info Missing |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
|
LOE ID: |
30124 |
|
Pollutant: |
ChemA (tissue) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Narrative Description Data |
Matrix: |
Not Specified |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Not Specified |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
A TMDL has been approved for this water segment-pollutant combination. The Calleguas Creek OC Pesticides and PCBs TMDL was adopted by the Los Angeles RWQCB on July 07, 2005 and subsequently approved by USEPA on March 24, 2006. The TMDL was integrated into the Basin Plan as Attachment A of Regional Board Resolution No. 2006-010. |
Data Reference: |
Basin Plan Amendments to the Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan as of 02/02/2009 |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
|
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
|
Temporal Representation: |
|
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
QA information unavailable. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
DECISION ID |
6721 |
|
Pollutant: |
Endosulfan (tissue & sediment) |
Final Listing Decision: |
List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Sources: |
Agriculture-storm runoff |
TMDL Name: |
Calleguas Creek Historic Pesticides (AU #5) |
TMDL Project Code: |
358 |
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA: |
03/24/2006 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Weight of Evidence: |
This pollutant is being considered for removal on the section 303(d) list under sections 2.2 of the Listing Policy. Under 2.2 of the Policy, a minimum of one line of evidence is needed to assess listing status.
Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list. There is sufficient justification to place it in the Being Addressed portion of the 303(d) list because a TMDL has been completed and adopted by the Los Angeles RWQCB and approved by USEPA, and is expected to result in attainment of the standard. |
|
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the Water Quality Limited Segments Being Addressed category of the section 303(d) list because a TMDL has been approved by USEPA, and applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem. |
|
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation: |
|
|
USEPA Decision: |
|
|
|
Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 6721 |
|
LOE ID: |
2019 |
|
Pollutant: |
Endosulfan |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Not Specified |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Not Specified |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. |
Data Reference: |
Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
|
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
|
Temporal Representation: |
|
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
QA Info Missing |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
|
LOE ID: |
30125 |
|
Pollutant: |
Endosulfan (tissue & sediment) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Narrative Description Data |
Matrix: |
Not Specified |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Not Specified |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
A TMDL has been approved for this water segment-pollutant combination. The Calleguas Creek OC Pesticides and PCBs TMDL was adopted by the Los Angeles RWQCB on July 07, 2005 and subsequently approved by USEPA on March 24, 2006. The TMDL was integrated into the Basin Plan as Attachment A of Regional Board Resolution No. 2006-010. |
Data Reference: |
Basin Plan Amendments to the Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan as of 02/02/2009 |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
|
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
|
Temporal Representation: |
|
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
QA information unavailable. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
DECISION ID |
6977 |
|
Pollutant: |
Trash |
Final Listing Decision: |
List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Sources: |
Agriculture-storm runoff | Recreational and Tourism Activities (non-boating) | Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers |
TMDL Name: |
Calleguas Creek (Beardsley/Revolon) Trash |
TMDL Project Code: |
720 |
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA: |
02/27/2008 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Weight of Evidence: |
This pollutant is being considered for removal on the section 303(d) list under sections 2.2 of the Listing Policy. Under 2.2 of the Policy, a minimum of one line of evidence is needed to assess listing status.
Three lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list. There is sufficient justification to place it in the Being Addressed portion of the 303(d) list because a TMDL has been completed and adopted by the Los Angeles RWQCB and approved by USEPA, and is expected to result in attainment of the standard. |
|
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the Water Quality Limited Segments Being Addressed category of the section 303(d) list because a TMDL has been approved by USEPA, and applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem. |
|
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation: |
|
|
USEPA Decision: |
|
|
|
Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 6977 |
|
LOE ID: |
4051 |
|
Pollutant: |
Trash |
LOE Subgroup: |
Visual |
Matrix: |
Not Specified |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Not Specified |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. |
Data Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Unspecified |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Unspecified |
Guideline Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Unspecified |
Temporal Representation: |
Unspecified |
Environmental Conditions: |
Unspecified |
QAPP Information: |
Unspecified |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
|
LOE ID: |
30197 |
|
Pollutant: |
Trash |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
10 |
Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Not Specified |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Five of ten samples exceeded the numeric target of zero trash. |
Data Reference: |
Calleguas Creek Watershed Monitoring Report prepared by Wishtoyo Foundation, Ventura Coastkeeper, 2006 |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
From the Los Angeles RWQCB Basin Plan: Waters shall not contain floating materials, including solids, liquids, foams, and scum, in concentrations that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
|
Basin Plan Amendments to the Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan as of 02/02/2009 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Narrative objective evaluated using numeric target of zero trash in Los Angeles River Trash TMDL and other regional trash TMDLs. |
Guideline Reference: |
Basin Plan Amendments to the Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan as of 02/02/2009 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
One monitoring station in Revolon Slough, Reach 4 (RS1). |
Temporal Representation: |
Ten observations and trash counts were taken every month from February to December of 2006 (N/M for June). |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
QA information unavailable. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
|
LOE ID: |
28045 |
|
Pollutant: |
Trash |
LOE Subgroup: |
Narrative Description Data |
Matrix: |
Not Specified |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Not Specified |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
A TMDL has been approved for this water segment-pollutant combination. The Revolon Slough & Beardsley Wash Trash TMDL was adopted by the Los Angeles RWQCB on June 07, 2007 and subsequently approved by USEPA. The TMDL was integrated into the Basin Plan as Attachment A of Regional Board Resolution No. 2007-007. |
Data Reference: |
Basin Plan Amendments to the Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan as of 02/02/2009 |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
|
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
|
Temporal Representation: |
|
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
QA information unavailable. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |