Final California 2010 Integrated Report (303(d) List/305(b) Report)

Supporting Information

Regional Board 4 - Los Angeles Region

Water Body Name: Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
Water Body ID: CAB4051200020000229082107
Water Body Type: Bay & Harbor
 
DECISION ID
5074
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
Pollutant: Nickel
Final Listing Decision: Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status Original
Reason for Delisting: Flaws in original listing
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This water body-pollutant combination was originally placed on the 2002-303(d) list in error. BPTCP data was used as the basis for determining whether the water body combination would be placed on the 303(d) list. However, nickel is not identified in the Consolidated Toxic Hot Spots Cleanup Plan as a chemical contributing to the creation or maintenance of the toxic hot spot within this water body because there is no available sediment quality guideline that meets the requirements of section 6.1.3 of the Listing Policy.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. No guideline is available to evaluate this data.
4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: The decision has not changed.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
USEPA Action (if applicable):
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5074, Nickel
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 110
 
Pollutant: Nickel
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: A total of 26 samples are available. BPTCP sediment samples ranging in concentration from 23 ppm to 53.6 ppm. Nickel is not identified in the Consolidated Toxic Hot Spots Cleanup Plan as a chemical contributing to the creation or maintenance of the toxic hot spot (LARWQCB and CCC, 2004).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use (LARWQCB, 1995)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: There is no available sediment quality guideline that meets the requirements of section 6.1.3 of the Listing Policy.
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: Samples were collected throughout water body.
Temporal Representation: Samples collected from 1992 through 1997.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: BPTCP Quality Assurance Project Plan (Stephenson et al., 1994)
Contaminated Sediments Task Force Database.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
5394
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
Pollutant: PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons)
Final Listing Decision: Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status Original
Reason for Delisting: Other
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for delisting under sections 4.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 4.6 two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status.

Three lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on section 4.6, there is known significant toxicity and bioassessment data associated with this water body segment but the number of pollutant sediment exceedances does not exceed the frequency allowed by the Listing Policy.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The sediment quality guideline used complies, with the requirements of section 6.1.3 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
3. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
4. One of 41 samples taken between 1992 and 1997 exceeded the 1,800 ug/g Effects Range Medium sediment guideline. Further sampling in 2002, recorded no exceedances out of 120 samples. Although significant toxicity data and benthic community impacts are associated with this water body segment, pollutant sediment concentrations does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy.
5. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: The decision has not changed.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
USEPA Action (if applicable):
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5394, PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 113
 
Pollutant: Sediment Toxicity
LOE Subgroup: Toxicity
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 17
Number of Exceedances: 13
 
Data and Information Type: Toxicity testing of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Thirteen of 17 samples were significantly toxic (Anderson et al., 1998).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Existing habitats and associated populations of wetlands fauna and flora shall be maintained by
-Maintaining substrate characteristics necessary to support flora and fauna which would be present naturally,
-Protecting food supplies for fish and wildlife,
-Protecting reproductive and nursery areas, and
-Protecting wildlife corridors.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Significant toxicity as compared to control conditions.
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: Samples were collected throughout the estuary.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected in 1994 and 1996.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: BPTCP Quality Assurance Project Plan (Stephenson et al., 1994).
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5394, PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 121
 
Pollutant: PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 161
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: Chemical monitoring of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Of the 120 core and grab samples from 2002, none exceeded the guideline. For the 41 samples collected between 1992 and 1997, one exceeded the sediment guideline (LARWQCB and CCC, 2004).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: A sediment quality guideline of 1,800 ug/g was used (Fairey et al., 2001).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between 1992 and 1997.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Bay Protection and Toxic Clean up Program.
Contaminated Sediments Task Force Database.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5394, PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 114
 
Pollutant: Estuarine Bioassessments
LOE Subgroup: Population/Community Degradation
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 11
Number of Exceedances: 5
 
Data and Information Type: Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Eleven samples are available with 5 exhibiting degraded conditions and 6 with transitional community characteristics (Anderson et al., 1998).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Existing habitats and associated populations of wetlands fauna and flora shall be maintained by:

-Maintaining substrate characteristics necessary to support flora and fauna which would be present naturally,
-Protecting food supplies for fish and wildlife,
-Protecting reproductive and nursery areas, and
-Protecting wildlife corridors.

Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Evaluation of the benthic data were completed using the approaches developed by scientists associated with the BPTCP. The relative benthic index used is a calculated value considering the total fauna, total mollusk species, crustacean species and indicator species at a site. The index ranges from 0 to 1.0. An index value of less than or equal to 0.3 is an indication that pollutants or other factors are negatively impacting the benthic community (Anderson et al., 1998).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected in 1992 and 1996.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: BPTCP Quality Assurance Project Plan (Stephenson et al., 1994).
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
5079
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
Pollutant: Cadmium (sediment)
Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status Original
Sources: Nonpoint Source
Expected TMDL Completion Date: 2019
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for removal from the section 303(d) list under sections 4.6 and 4.9 of the Listing Policy. Under section 4.6 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess delisting status while under section 4.9, a minimum of two lines of evidence are needed to assess listing status.

Four lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on section 4.6, the site has significant sediment toxicity and the pollutant concentration exceeds the sediment guideline. The benthic community is impacted.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The sediment quality guideline used complies with the requirements of section 6.1.3 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
3. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
4. Six of 20 samples exceeded the 4.21 ug/g PEL cadmium sediment guideline, 8 samples exhibit toxicity, and 4 sediment stations had a degraded benthic community. The four lines of evidence show that the water body segment exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. The benthic community in this water body is impacted and this pollutant is associated with this impact.
5. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: The decision has not changed.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
USEPA Action (if applicable): USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5079, Cadmium (sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 113
 
Pollutant: Sediment Toxicity
LOE Subgroup: Toxicity
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 17
Number of Exceedances: 13
 
Data and Information Type: Toxicity testing of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Thirteen of 17 samples were significantly toxic (Anderson et al., 1998).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Existing habitats and associated populations of wetlands fauna and flora shall be maintained by
-Maintaining substrate characteristics necessary to support flora and fauna which would be present naturally,
-Protecting food supplies for fish and wildlife,
-Protecting reproductive and nursery areas, and
-Protecting wildlife corridors.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Significant toxicity as compared to control conditions.
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: Samples were collected throughout the estuary.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected in 1994 and 1996.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: BPTCP Quality Assurance Project Plan (Stephenson et al., 1994).
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5079, Cadmium (sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 114
 
Pollutant: Estuarine Bioassessments
LOE Subgroup: Population/Community Degradation
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 11
Number of Exceedances: 5
 
Data and Information Type: Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Eleven samples are available with 5 exhibiting degraded conditions and 6 with transitional community characteristics (Anderson et al., 1998).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Existing habitats and associated populations of wetlands fauna and flora shall be maintained by:

-Maintaining substrate characteristics necessary to support flora and fauna which would be present naturally,
-Protecting food supplies for fish and wildlife,
-Protecting reproductive and nursery areas, and
-Protecting wildlife corridors.

Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Evaluation of the benthic data were completed using the approaches developed by scientists associated with the BPTCP. The relative benthic index used is a calculated value considering the total fauna, total mollusk species, crustacean species and indicator species at a site. The index ranges from 0 to 1.0. An index value of less than or equal to 0.3 is an indication that pollutants or other factors are negatively impacting the benthic community (Anderson et al., 1998).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected in 1992 and 1996.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: BPTCP Quality Assurance Project Plan (Stephenson et al., 1994).
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5079, Cadmium (sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 104
 
Pollutant: Cadmium
LOE Subgroup: Narrative Description Data
Matrix: Not Specified
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The Consolidated Toxic Hot Spots Cleanup Plan describes how the Los
Angeles Contaminated Task Force will develop a plan for the cleanup of
this site. While the planning has progressed, no remediation of the site has occurred. No responsible parties have been identified.
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:
Objective/Criterion Reference:
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation:
Temporal Representation:
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QA Info Missing
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5079, Cadmium (sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 105
 
Pollutant: Cadmium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 41
Number of Exceedances: 15
 
Data and Information Type: Chemical monitoring of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Of the 41 sediment core and grab samples, 15 exceed the sediment quality guideline (LARWQCB and CCC, 2004).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Existing habitats and associated populations of wetlands fauna and flora shall be maintained by:

-Maintaining substrate characteristics necessary to support flora and fauna which would be present naturally,
-Protecting food supplies for fish and wildlife,
-Protecting reproductive and nursery areas, and
-Protecting wildlife corridors.

Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: PEL: 4.21 ug/g (MacDonald et al., 1996).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: Samples were collected throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation: Samples collected between 1992 and 1997.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: BPTCP Quality Assurance Project Plan (Stephenson et al., 1994). Contaminated Sediments Task Force Database.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
5388
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
Pollutant: Chlordane (tissue & sediment)
Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status Original
Sources: Nonpoint Source
Expected TMDL Completion Date: 2019
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for delisting under sections 4.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 4.6 two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status.

Four lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on section 4.6, there is known significant toxicity and benthic impacts associated with this pollutant and the number of pollutant exceedances exceed the frequency allowed by the Listing Policy.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of not removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The sediment quality guideline used complies, with the requirements of section 6.1.3 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
3. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
4. Thirty of 39 samples taken between 1993 and 1997 exceeded the 6ng/g Effects Range Medium sediment guideline, There is known significant sediment toxicity data and benthic community impacts associated with the water body segment, and pollutant concentrations exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy.
5. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: The decision has not changed.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
USEPA Action (if applicable): USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5388, Chlordane (tissue & sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 115
 
Pollutant: Chlordane
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 39
Number of Exceedances: 30
 
Data and Information Type: Chemical monitoring of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Of the 39 core and grab samples, 30 exceed the sediment quality guideline (LARWQCB and CCC, 2004).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use (LARWQCB, 1995)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: An Effect Range Median of 6 ng/g was used (Long and Morgan, 1990).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples are spread throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected between 1993 and 1997.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Bay Protection and Toxic Cleanup Program (Stephenson et al., 1994)
Contaminated Sediments Task Force Database.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5388, Chlordane (tissue & sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 116
 
Pollutant: Chlordane
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 12
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Chemical monitoring of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The guideline is not exceeded in any of the 12 measurements. The original listing was based on exceeding background levels rather than valid assessment guidelines (TSMP, 2002).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan: Toxic pollutants shall not be present at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic life to levels which are harmful to aquatic life or human health (LARWQCB, 1995)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: OEHHA Screening Value: 2.0 ug/kg (Brodberg and Pollock, 1999).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: One station.
Temporal Representation: Data collected in most years from 1992 through 2003.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: State Mussel Watch Program.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5388, Chlordane (tissue & sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 113
 
Pollutant: Sediment Toxicity
LOE Subgroup: Toxicity
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 17
Number of Exceedances: 13
 
Data and Information Type: Toxicity testing of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Thirteen of 17 samples were significantly toxic (Anderson et al., 1998).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Existing habitats and associated populations of wetlands fauna and flora shall be maintained by
-Maintaining substrate characteristics necessary to support flora and fauna which would be present naturally,
-Protecting food supplies for fish and wildlife,
-Protecting reproductive and nursery areas, and
-Protecting wildlife corridors.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Significant toxicity as compared to control conditions.
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: Samples were collected throughout the estuary.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected in 1994 and 1996.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: BPTCP Quality Assurance Project Plan (Stephenson et al., 1994).
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5388, Chlordane (tissue & sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 114
 
Pollutant: Estuarine Bioassessments
LOE Subgroup: Population/Community Degradation
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 11
Number of Exceedances: 5
 
Data and Information Type: Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Eleven samples are available with 5 exhibiting degraded conditions and 6 with transitional community characteristics (Anderson et al., 1998).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Existing habitats and associated populations of wetlands fauna and flora shall be maintained by:

-Maintaining substrate characteristics necessary to support flora and fauna which would be present naturally,
-Protecting food supplies for fish and wildlife,
-Protecting reproductive and nursery areas, and
-Protecting wildlife corridors.

Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Evaluation of the benthic data were completed using the approaches developed by scientists associated with the BPTCP. The relative benthic index used is a calculated value considering the total fauna, total mollusk species, crustacean species and indicator species at a site. The index ranges from 0 to 1.0. An index value of less than or equal to 0.3 is an indication that pollutants or other factors are negatively impacting the benthic community (Anderson et al., 1998).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected in 1992 and 1996.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: BPTCP Quality Assurance Project Plan (Stephenson et al., 1994).
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
5328
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
Pollutant: Chromium (sediment)
Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status Original
Sources: Nonpoint Source
Expected TMDL Completion Date: 2019
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for delisting under sections 4.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 4.6 two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status.

Three lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on section 4.6, there is known significant toxicity and bioassessment data associated with this pollutant and the number of pollutant exceedances exceed the frequency allowed by the Listing Policy.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of not removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The sediment quality guideline used complies, with the requirements of section 6.1.3 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
3. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
4. Twelve of 41 samples taken between 1992 and 1997 exceeded the 370 ug/g Effects Range Medium sediment guideline, There is known significant toxicity data and benthic community impacts associated with the water body segment, and pollutant concentrations exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy.
5. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: The decision has not changed.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
USEPA Action (if applicable): USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5328, Chromium (sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 113
 
Pollutant: Sediment Toxicity
LOE Subgroup: Toxicity
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 17
Number of Exceedances: 13
 
Data and Information Type: Toxicity testing of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Thirteen of 17 samples were significantly toxic (Anderson et al., 1998).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Existing habitats and associated populations of wetlands fauna and flora shall be maintained by
-Maintaining substrate characteristics necessary to support flora and fauna which would be present naturally,
-Protecting food supplies for fish and wildlife,
-Protecting reproductive and nursery areas, and
-Protecting wildlife corridors.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Significant toxicity as compared to control conditions.
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: Samples were collected throughout the estuary.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected in 1994 and 1996.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: BPTCP Quality Assurance Project Plan (Stephenson et al., 1994).
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5328, Chromium (sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 117
 
Pollutant: Chromium (total)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 41
Number of Exceedances: 12
 
Data and Information Type: Chemical monitoring of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Of the 41 core and grab samples, 12 exceeded the sediment guideline (LARWQCB and CCC, 2004).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use (LARWQCB, 1995)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: An Effects Range-Median of 370 ug/g was used (Long et al., 1995).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples are spread throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation: Samples collected between 1992 and 1997.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Bay Protection and Toxic Cleanup Program (Stephenson et al., 1994)
Contaminated Sediments Task Force Database.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5328, Chromium (sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 114
 
Pollutant: Estuarine Bioassessments
LOE Subgroup: Population/Community Degradation
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 11
Number of Exceedances: 5
 
Data and Information Type: Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Eleven samples are available with 5 exhibiting degraded conditions and 6 with transitional community characteristics (Anderson et al., 1998).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Existing habitats and associated populations of wetlands fauna and flora shall be maintained by:

-Maintaining substrate characteristics necessary to support flora and fauna which would be present naturally,
-Protecting food supplies for fish and wildlife,
-Protecting reproductive and nursery areas, and
-Protecting wildlife corridors.

Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Evaluation of the benthic data were completed using the approaches developed by scientists associated with the BPTCP. The relative benthic index used is a calculated value considering the total fauna, total mollusk species, crustacean species and indicator species at a site. The index ranges from 0 to 1.0. An index value of less than or equal to 0.3 is an indication that pollutants or other factors are negatively impacting the benthic community (Anderson et al., 1998).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected in 1992 and 1996.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: BPTCP Quality Assurance Project Plan (Stephenson et al., 1994).
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
5110
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
Pollutant: Copper (sediment)
Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status Original
Sources: Nonpoint Source
Expected TMDL Completion Date: 2019
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for removal from the section 303(d) list under sections 4.6 and 4.9 of the Listing Policy. Under section 4.6 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess delisting status while under section 4.9, a minimum of two lines of evidence are needed to assess listing status.

Four lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on section 4.6, the site has significant sediment toxicity and the pollutant concentration exceeds the sediment guideline. The benthic community is impacted.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The sediment quality guideline used complies with the requirements of section 6.1.3 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
3. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
4. Two of 20 samples exceeded the 270 ug/g cadmium sediment guideline, 8 samples exhibit toxicity, and 4 sediment stations had a degraded benthic community. The four lines of evidence show that the water body segment exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. The benthic community in this water body is impacted and this pollutant is associated with this impact.
5. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: The decision has not changed.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
USEPA Action (if applicable): USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5110, Copper (sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 113
 
Pollutant: Sediment Toxicity
LOE Subgroup: Toxicity
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 17
Number of Exceedances: 13
 
Data and Information Type: Toxicity testing of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Thirteen of 17 samples were significantly toxic (Anderson et al., 1998).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Existing habitats and associated populations of wetlands fauna and flora shall be maintained by
-Maintaining substrate characteristics necessary to support flora and fauna which would be present naturally,
-Protecting food supplies for fish and wildlife,
-Protecting reproductive and nursery areas, and
-Protecting wildlife corridors.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Significant toxicity as compared to control conditions.
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: Samples were collected throughout the estuary.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected in 1994 and 1996.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: BPTCP Quality Assurance Project Plan (Stephenson et al., 1994).
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5110, Copper (sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 107
 
Pollutant: Copper
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 163
Number of Exceedances: 103
 
Data and Information Type: Chemical monitoring of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Data set from 2002 has 122 core samples; 1992-1997 data set has 41 samples. Of the 163 measurements, 103 exceed the sediment quality guideline (LARWQCB and CCC, 2004).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Existing habitats and associated populations of wetlands fauna and flora shall be maintained by:

-Maintaining substrate characteristics necessary to support flora and fauna which would be present naturally,
-Protecting food supplies for fish and wildlife,
-Protecting reproductive and nursery areas, and
-Protecting wildlife corridors.

Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: ERM of 270 ug/g (Long et al., 1995).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: Samples were collected throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation: Samples collected from 1992 through 1997 and in 2002.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: BPTCP Quality Assurance Project Plan (Stephenson et al., 1994)
Contaminated Sediments Task Force Database.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5110, Copper (sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 106
 
Pollutant: Copper
LOE Subgroup: Narrative Description Data
Matrix: Not Specified
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The Consolidated Toxic Hot Spots Cleanup Plan describes how the Los
Angeles Contaminated Task Force will develop a plan for the cleanup of
this site. While the planning has progressed, no remediation of the site has occurred. No responsible parties have been identified.
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:
Objective/Criterion Reference:
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation:
Temporal Representation:
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QA Info Missing
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5110, Copper (sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 114
 
Pollutant: Estuarine Bioassessments
LOE Subgroup: Population/Community Degradation
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 11
Number of Exceedances: 5
 
Data and Information Type: Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Eleven samples are available with 5 exhibiting degraded conditions and 6 with transitional community characteristics (Anderson et al., 1998).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Existing habitats and associated populations of wetlands fauna and flora shall be maintained by:

-Maintaining substrate characteristics necessary to support flora and fauna which would be present naturally,
-Protecting food supplies for fish and wildlife,
-Protecting reproductive and nursery areas, and
-Protecting wildlife corridors.

Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Evaluation of the benthic data were completed using the approaches developed by scientists associated with the BPTCP. The relative benthic index used is a calculated value considering the total fauna, total mollusk species, crustacean species and indicator species at a site. The index ranges from 0 to 1.0. An index value of less than or equal to 0.3 is an indication that pollutants or other factors are negatively impacting the benthic community (Anderson et al., 1998).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected in 1992 and 1996.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: BPTCP Quality Assurance Project Plan (Stephenson et al., 1994).
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
5572
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
Pollutant: DDT (tissue & sediment)
Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status Original
Sources: Nonpoint Source
Expected TMDL Completion Date: 2019
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for removal from the section 303(d) list under section 4.4 of the Listing Policy. Under section 4.4 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess delisting status.

Three lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Tissue data was used to place this water body pollutant on the 1998 list. There is also an OEHHA fish consumption advisory established in this water body segment. Under section 4.4 of the Listing Policy any water body segment where a health advisory against consumption of edible resident organisms has been removed and the chemical or biological contaminant specific evaluation guideline for tissue is no longer exceeded shall be removed from the section 303(d) list.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of not removing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that an OEHHA fish consumption advisory has been established for this pollutant and the water segment specific data indicates that the 100 ug/kg evaluation guideline for tissue was exceeded once. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: The decision has not changed.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
USEPA Action (if applicable): USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5572, DDT (tissue & sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 118
 
Pollutant: DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
LOE Subgroup: Health Advisories
Matrix: Not Specified
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: A fish consumption advisory has been established for the DDT in the Los Angeles/Long Beach Harbor area. The advisory was established by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment.
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:
Objective/Criterion Reference:
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation:
Temporal Representation:
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QA Info Missing
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5572, DDT (tissue & sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 119
 
Pollutant: DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: One-hundred and sixty-two samples are available.
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use (LARWQCB, 1995)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: No sediment quality guideline is available for this pollutant that satisfies the requirements of section 6.1.3 of the Listing Policy (LARWQCB and CCC, 2004).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples are spread throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between 1992 and 1997.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Bay Protection and Toxic Cleanup Program (Stephenson et al., 1994)
Contaminated Sediments Task Force Database.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5572, DDT (tissue & sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 120
 
Pollutant: DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 12
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The guideline is exceeded in one of the 12 measurements. The original listing was based on exceeding background levels rather than valid assessment guidelines (SMWP, 2004).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan: Toxic pollutants shall not be present at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic life to levels which are harmful to aquatic life or human health (LARWQCB, 1995)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: An OEHHA screening value of 100 ug/kg was used.
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: One station.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected from 1992 through 2003.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: State Mussel Watch Program.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
5073
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
Pollutant: Dieldrin
Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status Original
Sources: Nonpoint Source
Expected TMDL Completion Date: 2008
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for removal from the section 303(d) list under sections 4.6 and 4.9 of the Listing Policy. Four lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant.

This pollutant was placed on the 2002-303(d) list originally using a tissue guideline that is not allowed under section 6.1.3 of the Listing Policy. When evaluating this same tissue data using the appropriate OEHHA screening value, none of the 12 samples exceeded the screening value.

However, based on section 4.6, the site has significant sediment toxicity and the pollutant concentration exceeds the sediment guideline. The benthic community is impacted.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The sediment quality guideline used complies with the requirements of section 6.1.3 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
3. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
4. Even though the tissue samples do not exceed the criteria, ten of 38 sediment samples exceeded the ERM for dieldrin in sediment, 13 out of 17 sediment samples exhibited significant toxicity, and 5 out of 11 sediment samples exhibited degraded conditions using the Relative Benthic Index (RBI). These lines of evidence show that the water body segment exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. The benthic community in this water body is impacted and this pollutant is associated with this impact.
5. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: The decision has not changed.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
USEPA Action (if applicable): USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5073, Dieldrin
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 114
 
Pollutant: Estuarine Bioassessments
LOE Subgroup: Population/Community Degradation
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 11
Number of Exceedances: 5
 
Data and Information Type: Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Eleven samples are available with 5 exhibiting degraded conditions and 6 with transitional community characteristics (Anderson et al., 1998).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Existing habitats and associated populations of wetlands fauna and flora shall be maintained by:

-Maintaining substrate characteristics necessary to support flora and fauna which would be present naturally,
-Protecting food supplies for fish and wildlife,
-Protecting reproductive and nursery areas, and
-Protecting wildlife corridors.

Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Evaluation of the benthic data were completed using the approaches developed by scientists associated with the BPTCP. The relative benthic index used is a calculated value considering the total fauna, total mollusk species, crustacean species and indicator species at a site. The index ranges from 0 to 1.0. An index value of less than or equal to 0.3 is an indication that pollutants or other factors are negatively impacting the benthic community (Anderson et al., 1998).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected in 1992 and 1996.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: BPTCP Quality Assurance Project Plan (Stephenson et al., 1994).
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5073, Dieldrin
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 113
 
Pollutant: Sediment Toxicity
LOE Subgroup: Toxicity
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 17
Number of Exceedances: 13
 
Data and Information Type: Toxicity testing of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Thirteen of 17 samples were significantly toxic (Anderson et al., 1998).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Existing habitats and associated populations of wetlands fauna and flora shall be maintained by
-Maintaining substrate characteristics necessary to support flora and fauna which would be present naturally,
-Protecting food supplies for fish and wildlife,
-Protecting reproductive and nursery areas, and
-Protecting wildlife corridors.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Significant toxicity as compared to control conditions.
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: Samples were collected throughout the estuary.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected in 1994 and 1996.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: BPTCP Quality Assurance Project Plan (Stephenson et al., 1994).
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5073, Dieldrin
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 109
 
Pollutant: Dieldrin
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 38
Number of Exceedances: 10
 
Data and Information Type: Chemical monitoring of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Of 38 sediment samples (cores or grabs), 10 exceeded the sediment guideline (LARWQCB and CCC, 2004).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use (LARWQCB, 1995).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: An Effects Range-Median of 8 ng/g was used (Long et al., 1995).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: Thirty-eight samples were collected throughout the estuary.
Temporal Representation: Samples collected between 1992 and 1997.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Contaminated Sediments Task Force Database (Stephenson et al. 1994)
Bay Protection and Toxic Cleanup Program.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5073, Dieldrin
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 108
 
Pollutant: Dieldrin
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 12
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fish tissue analysis
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The guideline is not exceeded in any of the 12 measurements. The original listing was based on exceeding background levels rather than valid assessment guidelines (SMWP, 2004).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan: Toxic pollutants shall not be present at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic life to levels which are harmful to aquatic life or human health (LARWQCB, 1995).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: OEHHA Screening Value: 2.0 ug/kg (Brodberg and Pollock, 1999).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: One station.
Temporal Representation: Samples collected annually from 1992 through 2003.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: State Mussel Watch Program.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
5591
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
Pollutant: Lead (sediment)
Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status Original
Sources: Nonpoint Source
Expected TMDL Completion Date: 2019
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for delisting under sections 4.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 4.6 two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status.

Three lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on section 4.6, there is known significant toxicity and bioassessment data associated with this pollutant and the number of pollutant exceedances exceed the frequency allowed by the Listing Policy.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of not removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The sediment quality guideline used complies, with the requirements of section 6.1.3 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
3. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
4. Twenty-two of 41 samples taken between 1992 and 1997 and 77 of 122 samples taken in 2002 exceeded the 112.18 ug/g Effects Range Medium sediment guideline, There is known significant toxicity data and benthic community impacts associated with the water body segment, and pollutant concentrations exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy.
5. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: The decision has not changed.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
USEPA Action (if applicable): USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5591, Lead (sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 113
 
Pollutant: Sediment Toxicity
LOE Subgroup: Toxicity
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 17
Number of Exceedances: 13
 
Data and Information Type: Toxicity testing of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Thirteen of 17 samples were significantly toxic (Anderson et al., 1998).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Existing habitats and associated populations of wetlands fauna and flora shall be maintained by
-Maintaining substrate characteristics necessary to support flora and fauna which would be present naturally,
-Protecting food supplies for fish and wildlife,
-Protecting reproductive and nursery areas, and
-Protecting wildlife corridors.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Significant toxicity as compared to control conditions.
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: Samples were collected throughout the estuary.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected in 1994 and 1996.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: BPTCP Quality Assurance Project Plan (Stephenson et al., 1994).
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5591, Lead (sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 125
 
Pollutant: Lead
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 163
Number of Exceedances: 99
 
Data and Information Type: Chemical monitoring of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Data set from 2002: 77 of 122 core and grab samples exceed the sediment guideline. Data from 1992-1997: 22 of 41 core and grab samples exceed the sediment guideline (LARWQCB and CCC, 2004).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use (LARWQCB, 1995)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: A probable Effects Level of 112.18 ug/g was used (MacDonald et al., 1996).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: The 163 samples are spread throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected from 1992 to 1997 and in 2002.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Bay Protection and Toxic Cleanup Program (Stephenson et al., 1994) Contaminated Sediments Task Force Database.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5591, Lead (sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 114
 
Pollutant: Estuarine Bioassessments
LOE Subgroup: Population/Community Degradation
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 11
Number of Exceedances: 5
 
Data and Information Type: Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Eleven samples are available with 5 exhibiting degraded conditions and 6 with transitional community characteristics (Anderson et al., 1998).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Existing habitats and associated populations of wetlands fauna and flora shall be maintained by:

-Maintaining substrate characteristics necessary to support flora and fauna which would be present naturally,
-Protecting food supplies for fish and wildlife,
-Protecting reproductive and nursery areas, and
-Protecting wildlife corridors.

Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Evaluation of the benthic data were completed using the approaches developed by scientists associated with the BPTCP. The relative benthic index used is a calculated value considering the total fauna, total mollusk species, crustacean species and indicator species at a site. The index ranges from 0 to 1.0. An index value of less than or equal to 0.3 is an indication that pollutants or other factors are negatively impacting the benthic community (Anderson et al., 1998).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected in 1992 and 1996.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: BPTCP Quality Assurance Project Plan (Stephenson et al., 1994).
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
5128
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
Pollutant: Mercury (sediment)
Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status Original
Sources: Nonpoint Source
Expected TMDL Completion Date: 2019
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for removal from the section 303(d) list under sections 4.6 and 4.9 of the Listing Policy. Under section 4.6 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess delisting status while under section 4.9, a minimum of two lines of evidence are needed to assess listing status.

Four lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on section 4.6, the site has significant sediment toxicity and the pollutant concentration exceeds the sediment guideline. The benthic community is impacted.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The sediment quality guideline used complies with the requirements of section 6.1.3 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
3. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
4. Two of 20 samples exceeded the 2.1 ug/g mercury sediment guideline, 8 samples exhibit toxicity, and 4 sediment stations had a degraded benthic community. The four lines of evidence show that the water body segment exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. The benthic community in this water body is impacted and this pollutant is associated with this impact.
5. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: The decision has not changed.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
USEPA Action (if applicable): USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5128, Mercury (sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 114
 
Pollutant: Estuarine Bioassessments
LOE Subgroup: Population/Community Degradation
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 11
Number of Exceedances: 5
 
Data and Information Type: Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Eleven samples are available with 5 exhibiting degraded conditions and 6 with transitional community characteristics (Anderson et al., 1998).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Existing habitats and associated populations of wetlands fauna and flora shall be maintained by:

-Maintaining substrate characteristics necessary to support flora and fauna which would be present naturally,
-Protecting food supplies for fish and wildlife,
-Protecting reproductive and nursery areas, and
-Protecting wildlife corridors.

Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Evaluation of the benthic data were completed using the approaches developed by scientists associated with the BPTCP. The relative benthic index used is a calculated value considering the total fauna, total mollusk species, crustacean species and indicator species at a site. The index ranges from 0 to 1.0. An index value of less than or equal to 0.3 is an indication that pollutants or other factors are negatively impacting the benthic community (Anderson et al., 1998).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected in 1992 and 1996.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: BPTCP Quality Assurance Project Plan (Stephenson et al., 1994).
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5128, Mercury (sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 111
 
Pollutant: Mercury
LOE Subgroup: Narrative Description Data
Matrix: Not Specified
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The Consolidated Toxic Hot Spots Cleanup Plan describes how the Los
Angeles Contaminated Sediment Task Force will develop a plan for the cleanup of
this site. While the planning has progressed, no remediation of the site has occurred. No responsible parties have been identified.
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:
Objective/Criterion Reference:
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation:
Temporal Representation:
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QA Info Missing
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5128, Mercury (sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 112
 
Pollutant: Mercury
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 155
Number of Exceedances: 23
 
Data and Information Type: Chemical monitoring of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Data set from 2002 has 122 samples and the data from 1992 through 1997 has 33 samples (cores and grabs). Twenty-three measures exceed the sediment guideline in 155 samples (LARWQCB and CCC, 2004).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use. (LARWQCB, 1995)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Sediment Quality Guideline: 2.1 ug/g (PTI Environmental Services, 1991).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: Samples were collected throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected between 1992 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: BPTCP Quality Assurance Project Plan. (Stephenson et al., 1994)
Contaminated Sediments Task Force Database.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5128, Mercury (sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 113
 
Pollutant: Sediment Toxicity
LOE Subgroup: Toxicity
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 17
Number of Exceedances: 13
 
Data and Information Type: Toxicity testing of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Thirteen of 17 samples were significantly toxic (Anderson et al., 1998).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Existing habitats and associated populations of wetlands fauna and flora shall be maintained by
-Maintaining substrate characteristics necessary to support flora and fauna which would be present naturally,
-Protecting food supplies for fish and wildlife,
-Protecting reproductive and nursery areas, and
-Protecting wildlife corridors.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Significant toxicity as compared to control conditions.
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: Samples were collected throughout the estuary.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected in 1994 and 1996.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: BPTCP Quality Assurance Project Plan (Stephenson et al., 1994).
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
5347
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
Pollutant: PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) (tissue & sediment)
Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status Original
Sources: Nonpoint Source
Expected TMDL Completion Date: 2019
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for removal from the section 303(d) list under sections 4.4, 4.5, and 4.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 4.4 and 4.5 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess delisting status while under section 4.6, a minimum of two lines of evidence are needed to assess listing status.

Five lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. There is a PCB fish consumption health advisory established for the Los Angeles/ Long Beach harbor area. Tissue data shows exceedances of the OEHHA tissue guidelines, sediment core samples taken between 1992 and 2002 exceed PCBs sediment guidelines and significant sediment toxicity has been documented in the segment. In addition, the benthic community is impacted as well.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The tissue and sediment quality guidelines used comply with the requirements of section 6.1.3 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
3. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
4. Eighty-eight of 161 samples exceeded the 400 ng/g sediment guideline, 13 of 17 samples exhibit toxicity. Twelve of 12 tissue samples exceeded the 20 ug/kg OEHHA tissue guidelines. All of these exceedances surpass the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. There is a PCB fish consumption health advisory established for the Los Angeles/ Long Beach harbor area and the benthic community in this water body is impacted.
5.Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: The decision has not changed.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
USEPA Action (if applicable): USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5347, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) (tissue & sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 113
 
Pollutant: Sediment Toxicity
LOE Subgroup: Toxicity
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 17
Number of Exceedances: 13
 
Data and Information Type: Toxicity testing of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Thirteen of 17 samples were significantly toxic (Anderson et al., 1998).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Existing habitats and associated populations of wetlands fauna and flora shall be maintained by
-Maintaining substrate characteristics necessary to support flora and fauna which would be present naturally,
-Protecting food supplies for fish and wildlife,
-Protecting reproductive and nursery areas, and
-Protecting wildlife corridors.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Significant toxicity as compared to control conditions.
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: Samples were collected throughout the estuary.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected in 1994 and 1996.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: BPTCP Quality Assurance Project Plan (Stephenson et al., 1994).
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5347, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) (tissue & sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 114
 
Pollutant: Estuarine Bioassessments
LOE Subgroup: Population/Community Degradation
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 11
Number of Exceedances: 5
 
Data and Information Type: Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Eleven samples are available with 5 exhibiting degraded conditions and 6 with transitional community characteristics (Anderson et al., 1998).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Existing habitats and associated populations of wetlands fauna and flora shall be maintained by:

-Maintaining substrate characteristics necessary to support flora and fauna which would be present naturally,
-Protecting food supplies for fish and wildlife,
-Protecting reproductive and nursery areas, and
-Protecting wildlife corridors.

Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Evaluation of the benthic data were completed using the approaches developed by scientists associated with the BPTCP. The relative benthic index used is a calculated value considering the total fauna, total mollusk species, crustacean species and indicator species at a site. The index ranges from 0 to 1.0. An index value of less than or equal to 0.3 is an indication that pollutants or other factors are negatively impacting the benthic community (Anderson et al., 1998).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected in 1992 and 1996.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: BPTCP Quality Assurance Project Plan (Stephenson et al., 1994).
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5347, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) (tissue & sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 122
 
Pollutant: PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)
LOE Subgroup: Health Advisories
Matrix: Not Specified
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: A fish consumption advisory has been established for PCBs in the Los Angeles/Long Beach Harbor area. The advisory was established by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment.
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:
Objective/Criterion Reference:
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation:
Temporal Representation:
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QA Info Missing
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5347, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) (tissue & sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 124
 
Pollutant: PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 161
Number of Exceedances: 88
 
Data and Information Type: Chemical monitoring of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Of the 161 core and grab samples, 88 exceed the guideline (LARWQCB and CCC, 2004).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use (LARWQCB, 1995)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: A sediment quality guideline of 400 ng/g was used (MacDonald et al., 2000).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples are spread throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected between 1992 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Bay Protection and Toxic Cleanup Program (Stephenson et al., 1994).
Contaminated Sediments Task Force Database.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5347, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) (tissue & sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 123
 
Pollutant: PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 12
Number of Exceedances: 12
 
Data and Information Type: Fish tissue analysis
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The tissue guideline is exceeded in 12 of 12 measurements (SMWP, 2004).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan: Toxic pollutants shall not be present at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic life to levels which are harmful to aquatic life or human health (LARWQCB, 1995)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: An OEHHA tissue guideline of 20 ug/kg was used (Brodberg & Pollack, 1999)
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: One station.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected between 1992 and 2003.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: State Mussel Watch Program.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
5389
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
Pollutant: Toxaphene (tissue)
Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status Original
Sources: Nonpoint Source
Expected TMDL Completion Date: 2019
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for removal from the section 303(d) list under section 4.5 of the Listing Policy. Under section 4.5 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess delisting status.

One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. Five of 12 samples exceeded the 30 ug/kg OEHHA tissue guideline but the number of samples is insufficient to determine with the confidence and power required by the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: The decision has not changed.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
USEPA Action (if applicable): USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5389, Toxaphene (tissue)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 126
 
Pollutant: Toxaphene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 12
Number of Exceedances: 5
 
Data and Information Type: Fish tissue analysis
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Five measurements of 12 total measurements exceed the tissue guideline (SMWP, 2004).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan: Toxic pollutants shall not be present at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic life to levels that are harmful to aquatic life or human health (LARWQCB, 1995).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: An OEHHA tissue guideline of 30 ug/kg was used (Brodberg and Pollock, 1999).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: One station.
Temporal Representation: One sample per year from 1992 through 2003.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: State Mussel Watch Program.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
5327
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
Pollutant: Zinc (sediment)
Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status Original
Sources: Nonpoint Source
Expected TMDL Completion Date: 2019
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for delisting under sections 4.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 4.6 two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status.

Three lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on section 4.6, there is known significant toxicity and bioassessment data associated with this pollutant and the number of pollutant exceedances exceed the frequency allowed by the Listing Policy.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The sediment quality guideline used complies, with the requirements of section 6.1.3 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
3. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
4. Thirty of 41 samples taken between 1992 and 1997 and 76 of 122 samples taken in 2002 exceeded the 410 ug/g Effects Range Medium sediment guideline. There is known significant toxicity data and benthic community impacts associated with the water body segment, and pollutant concentrations exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy.
5. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: The decision has not changed.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
USEPA Action (if applicable): USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5327, Zinc (sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 114
 
Pollutant: Estuarine Bioassessments
LOE Subgroup: Population/Community Degradation
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 11
Number of Exceedances: 5
 
Data and Information Type: Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Eleven samples are available with 5 exhibiting degraded conditions and 6 with transitional community characteristics (Anderson et al., 1998).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Existing habitats and associated populations of wetlands fauna and flora shall be maintained by:

-Maintaining substrate characteristics necessary to support flora and fauna which would be present naturally,
-Protecting food supplies for fish and wildlife,
-Protecting reproductive and nursery areas, and
-Protecting wildlife corridors.

Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Evaluation of the benthic data were completed using the approaches developed by scientists associated with the BPTCP. The relative benthic index used is a calculated value considering the total fauna, total mollusk species, crustacean species and indicator species at a site. The index ranges from 0 to 1.0. An index value of less than or equal to 0.3 is an indication that pollutants or other factors are negatively impacting the benthic community (Anderson et al., 1998).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected in 1992 and 1996.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: BPTCP Quality Assurance Project Plan (Stephenson et al., 1994).
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5327, Zinc (sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 113
 
Pollutant: Sediment Toxicity
LOE Subgroup: Toxicity
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 17
Number of Exceedances: 13
 
Data and Information Type: Toxicity testing of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Thirteen of 17 samples were significantly toxic (Anderson et al., 1998).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Existing habitats and associated populations of wetlands fauna and flora shall be maintained by
-Maintaining substrate characteristics necessary to support flora and fauna which would be present naturally,
-Protecting food supplies for fish and wildlife,
-Protecting reproductive and nursery areas, and
-Protecting wildlife corridors.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Significant toxicity as compared to control conditions.
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: Samples were collected throughout the estuary.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected in 1994 and 1996.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: BPTCP Quality Assurance Project Plan (Stephenson et al., 1994).
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5327, Zinc (sediment)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 127
 
Pollutant: Zinc
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 163
Number of Exceedances: 106
 
Data and Information Type: Chemical monitoring of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: From the 2002 data set, 76 of 122 core and grab samples exceed the sediment guideline. For the 1992-1997 data set, 30 of 41 core and grab samples exceed the sediment guideline (LARWQCB and CCC, 2004).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use (LARWQCB, 1995).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: An Effects Range-Median of 410 ug/g was used (Long et al., 1995).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: The 163 samples are spread throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected between 1992 and 1997 and in 2002.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Bay Protection and Toxic Cleanup Program.
Contaminated Sediments Task Force Database.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
6279
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
Pollutant: 2-Methylnaphthalene
Final Listing Decision: List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status Original
Sources: Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date: 2008
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: USEPA placed this water body-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list using the data and information contained in the line of evidence. The original listing for PAHs has been replaced with listings for specific PAH compounds.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: The decision has not changed.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
USEPA Action (if applicable): USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6279, 2-Methylnaphthalene
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 129
 
Pollutant: 2-Methylnaphthalene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 50
Number of Exceedances: 12
 
Data and Information Type: Chemical monitoring of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Available data shows evidence of sediment toxicity and sediment chemistry exceedances for 2-Methylnaphthalene. There were 12 out of 50 samples exceeding the evaluation guideline (USEPA, 2007).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: A sediment quality guideline of 201.28 ng/g was used (MacDonald et al., 1996).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation:
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Data record: 1992-2002, CSTF database
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
7361
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
Pollutant: Benthic Community Effects
Final Listing Decision: List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status Original
Sources: Nonpoint Source
Expected TMDL Completion Date: 2019
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: 303(d) listing decisions made prior to 2006 were not held in an assessment database. The Regional Boards will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: The decision has not changed.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
USEPA Action (if applicable): USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 7361, Benthic Community Effects
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 3909
 
Pollutant: Benthic Community Effects
LOE Subgroup: Population/Community Degradation
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006.
Data Reference: Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:
Objective/Criterion Reference:
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: Unspecified
Temporal Representation: Unspecified
Environmental Conditions: Unspecified
QAPP Information: Unspecified
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
6281
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
Pollutant: Benzo(a)anthracene
Final Listing Decision: List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status Original
Sources: Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date: 2019
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: USEPA placed this water body-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list using the data and information contained in the line of evidence. The original listing for PAHs has been replaced with listings for specific PAH compounds.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: The decision has not changed.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
USEPA Action (if applicable): USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6281, Benzo(a)anthracene
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 130
 
Pollutant: Benzo(a)anthracene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 53
Number of Exceedances: 15
 
Data and Information Type: Chemical monitoring of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Available data shows evidence of sediment toxicity and sediment chemistry exceedances for benzo[a]anthracene. There were 15 out of 53 samples exceeding the evaluation guideline (USEPA, 2007).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: A sediment quality guideline of 692.53 ng/g was used (MacDonald et al., 1996).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: Samples were collected throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation:
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Data record: 1992-2002, CSTF database
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
6282
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
Pollutant: Benzo(a)pyrene (3,4-Benzopyrene -7-d)
Final Listing Decision: List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status Original
Sources: Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date: 2008
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: USEPA placed this water body-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list using the data and information contained in the line of evidence. The original listing for PAHs has been replaced with listings for specific PAH compounds.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: The decision has not changed.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
USEPA Action (if applicable): USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6282, Benzo(a)pyrene (3,4-Benzopyrene -7-d)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 131
 
Pollutant: Benzo(a)pyrene (3,4-Benzopyrene -7-d)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 57
Number of Exceedances: 23
 
Data and Information Type: Chemical monitoring of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Available data shows evidence of sediment toxicity and sediment chemistry exceedances for benzo[a]pyrene. There were 23 out of 57 samples exceeding the evaluation guideline (USEPA, 2007).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: A sediment quailty guideline of 763.22 ng/g was used (MacDonald et al., 1996).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: Samples were collected throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation:
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Data record: 1992-2002, CSTF database
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
6280
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
Pollutant: Chrysene (C1-C4)
Final Listing Decision: List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status Original
Sources: Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date: 2008
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: USEPA placed this water body-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list using the data and information contained in the line of evidence. The original listing for PAHs has been replaced with listings for specific PAH compounds.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: The decision has not changed.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
USEPA Action (if applicable): USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6280, Chrysene (C1-C4)
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 132
 
Pollutant: Chrysene (C1-C4)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 53
Number of Exceedances: 16
 
Data and Information Type: Chemical monitoring of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Available data shows evidence of sediment toxicity and sediment chemistry exceedances for chrysene. There were 16 out of 53 samples exceeding the evaluation guideline (USEPA, 2007).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: A sediment quality guideline of 845.98 ng/g was used (MacDonald et al., 1996).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: Samples were collected throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation:
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Data record: 1992-2002, CSTF database
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
6278
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
Pollutant: Phenanthrene
Final Listing Decision: List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status Original
Sources: Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date: 2008
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: USEPA placed this water body-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list using the data and information contained in the line of evidence. The original listing for PAHs has been replaced with listings for specific PAH compounds.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: The decision has not changed.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
USEPA Action (if applicable): USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6278, Phenanthrene
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 134
 
Pollutant: Phenanthrene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 53
Number of Exceedances: 13
 
Data and Information Type: Chemical monitoring of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Available data shows evidence of sediment toxicity and sediment chemistry exceedances for phenanthrene. There were 13 out of 53 samples exceeding the evaluation guideline (USEPA, 2007).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: A sediment quality guideline of 543.53 ng/g was used (MacDonald et al., 1996).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: Samples were collected throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation:
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Data record: 1992-2002, CSTF database
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
6277
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
Pollutant: Pyrene
Final Listing Decision: List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status Original
Sources: Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date: 2008
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: USEPA placed this water body-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list using the data and information contained in the line of evidence. The original listing for PAHs has been replaced with listings for specific PAH compounds.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: The decision has not changed.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
USEPA Action (if applicable): USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6277, Pyrene
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 135
 
Pollutant: Pyrene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 53
Number of Exceedances: 28
 
Data and Information Type: Chemical monitoring of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Available data shows evidence of sediment toxicity and sediment chemistry exceedances for pyrene. There were 28 out of 53 samples exceeding the evaluation guideline (USEPA, 2007).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: A sediment quality guideline of 1,397.4 ng/g was used (MacDonald et al., 1996).
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: Samples were collected throughout the water body.
Temporal Representation:
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Data record: 1992-2002, CSTF database.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
7411
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
Pollutant: Sediment Toxicity
Final Listing Decision: List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status Original
Sources: Nonpoint Source
Expected TMDL Completion Date: 2019
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: 303(d) listing decisions made prior to 2006 were not held in an assessment database. The Regional Boards will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: The decision has not changed.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
USEPA Action (if applicable): USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 7411, Sediment Toxicity
Region 4     
Los Angeles Harbor - Consolidated Slip
 
LOE ID: 113
 
Pollutant: Sediment Toxicity
LOE Subgroup: Toxicity
Matrix: Sediment
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Marine Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 17
Number of Exceedances: 13
 
Data and Information Type: Toxicity testing of sediments
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Thirteen of 17 samples were significantly toxic (Anderson et al., 1998).
Data Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Basin Plan (LARWQCB, 1995): Existing habitats and associated populations of wetlands fauna and flora shall be maintained by
-Maintaining substrate characteristics necessary to support flora and fauna which would be present naturally,
-Protecting food supplies for fish and wildlife,
-Protecting reproductive and nursery areas, and
-Protecting wildlife corridors.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Significant toxicity as compared to control conditions.
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: Samples were collected throughout the estuary.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected in 1994 and 1996.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: BPTCP Quality Assurance Project Plan (Stephenson et al., 1994).
QAPP Information Reference(s):