Water Body Name: | Dana Point Harbor |
Water Body ID: | CAB9011400020010831141600 |
Water Body Type: | Bay & Harbor |
DECISION ID |
6098 |
Region 9 |
Dana Point Harbor |
||
Pollutant: | Indicator Bacteria |
Final Listing Decision: | Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Reason for Delisting: | Change from general pollutant to specific pollutant listing (e.g. metals to copper) |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | 303(d) listing decisions made prior to 2006 were not held in an assessment database. The Regional Boards will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | This listing has been moved to a new waterbody segment. See "Pacific Ocean Shoreline, Dana Point HSA, at Dana Point Harbor at Baby Beach." |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
USEPA Action (if applicable): | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 4450 | ||||
Pollutant: | Indicator Bacteria | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Not Recorded | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Unspecified | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Unspecified | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Unspecified | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Unspecified | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Unspecified | ||||
QAPP Information: | Unspecified | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
16404 |
Region 9 |
Dana Point Harbor |
||
Pollutant: | Copper |
Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Sources: | Marinas and Recreational Boating | Source Unknown | Unknown Nonpoint Source | Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers |
Expected TMDL Completion Date: | 2019 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
Four lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Twenty-six of the 39 samples exceed the water quality objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Twenty-six of 39 samples exceed the CTR or ERL and ERM criteria and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
USEPA Action (if applicable): | USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 26488 | ||||
Pollutant: | Copper | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 5 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 5 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Chemical monitoring of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Five sediment samples were collected in Dana Point Harbor. All five samples exceed the ERL for copper. One of the five samples exceed the ERM. | ||||
Data Reference: | Regional Harbor Monitoring Program Pilot Project 2005-06 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin, 2007 (RWQCB, 2007). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Effects Range Median (ERM) and Effects Range Low (ERL) for copper (Long, et, al., 1995). The ERM for copper is 270 ug/g dry weight and the ERL is 34 ug/g dry weight | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentrations in marine and estuary sediments. Environmental Management. 19, (1): 81-97 | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected both at West Basin Channel and East Basin Channel of Dana Point Harbor | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on August 2005 and 2006. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Weston Solutions. 2005. Quality Assurance Project Plan for San Diego Regional Harbor Monitoring Program Pilot Project. Prepared for the Port of San Diego, City of San Diego, City of Oceanside, and County of Orange. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 26483 | ||||
Pollutant: | Copper | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 14 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 6 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Chemical monitoring of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Eight samples collected in the West Basin Channel (Area B) and six samples collected in the East Basin Channel (Area C) were used for the analysis. Two of the eight samples exceed the ERL for copper in Area B and four of the six samples collected in area C exceed the ERL for copper. None of the 14 samples exceed the ERM. The composite sample for Area C also exceeded the ERL. | ||||
Data Reference: | Regional Harbor Monitoring Program Pilot Project 2005-06 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin, 2007 (RWQCB, 2007). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Effects Range Median (ERM) and Effects Range Low (ERL) for copper (Long, et, al., 1995). The ERM for copper is 270 ug/g dry weight and the ERL is 34 ug/g dry weight | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentrations in marine and estuary sediments. Environmental Management. 19, (1): 81-97 | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected both at West Basin Channel and East Basin Channel of Dana Point Harbor | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on August 23, 2006. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Kinnetic Laboratories conducts all activities in accordance with formal QA/QC procedures. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 26494 | ||||
Pollutant: | Copper | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 5 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 5 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Five water samples were collected at single water level from five stations. All samples exceed the CTR values for acute and chronic water quality criterion. | ||||
Data Reference: | Regional Harbor Monitoring Program Pilot Project 2005-06 | ||||
Regional Harbor Monitoring Program Pilot Project 2006-07 | |||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | From the Basin Plan on toxicity, all waters shall be free of toxic substances that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life.
From the Basin Plan on pesticides, no individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in the water column, sediments or biota at concentration(s) that adversely affect beneficial uses. Pesticides shall not be present at levels which will bioaccumulate in aquatic organisms to levels which are harmful to human health, wildlife or aquatic organisms (RWQCB, 2007). |
||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | From the CTR, the dissolved copper chronic criterion is 3.1 ppb and the acute criterion is 4.8 ppb (U.S. EPA, 2000). | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Standards; Establishment of Numeric Criteria for Priority Toxic Pollutants for the State of California; Rule. 40 CFR Part 131. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, Water Division, San Francisco, CA | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Three stations (D1M, D2M, and D3M) were sampled in 2005 and two stations (D106M and D206M) in 2006 from Dana Point Harbor. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on August 15, 2005 and August 21, 2006. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Weston Solutions. 2005. Quality Assurance Project Plan for San Diego Regional Harbor Monitoring Program Pilot Project. Prepared for the Port of San Diego, City of San Diego, City of Oceanside, and County of Orange. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Project Plan for San Diego Regional Harbor Monitoring Program Pilot Project. | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 26493 | ||||
Pollutant: | Copper | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 15 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 15 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | The mean of the 3 samples from the five stations exceed the acute or chronic water quality objective | ||||
Data Reference: | Extent and Magnitude of Copper Contamination in Marinas of the San Diego Region, California. Technical Report 483 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | From the Basin Plan on toxicity, all waters shall be free of toxic substances that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life.
From the Basin Plan on pesticides, no individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in the water column, sediments or biota at concentration(s) that adversely affect beneficial uses. Pesticides shall not be present at levels which will bioaccumulate in aquatic organisms to levels which are harmful to human health, wildlife or aquatic organisms (RWQCB, 2007). |
||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | From the CTR, the dissolved copper chronic criterion is 3.1 ppb and the acute criterion is 4.8 ppb (U.S. EPA, 2000). | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Standards; Establishment of Numeric Criteria for Priority Toxic Pollutants for the State of California; Rule. 40 CFR Part 131. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, Water Division, San Francisco, CA | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Five stations were sampled in Dana Point Harbor. Each station was sampled at upper, mid and lower levels within the water column to total of three samples. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | All samples were collected on August 15, 2005. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP. 2005. Quality Assurance Project Plan, Marina Copper Monitoring Study. SWRCB Agreement No. 04-236-190-0. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. August 2005. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Project Plan, Marina Copper Monitoring Study. SWRCB Agreement No. 04-236-190-0. A | ||||
DECISION ID |
16406 |
Region 9 |
Dana Point Harbor |
||
Pollutant: | Toxicity |
Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Sources: | Unknown Nonpoint Source | Unknown Point Source | Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers |
Expected TMDL Completion Date: | 2021 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Five of the samples exceed the water quality objective for toxicity. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Five of twelve samples exceed the toxicity water quality objective and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
USEPA Action (if applicable): | USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 26499 | ||||
Pollutant: | Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Toxicity tests were conducted using composite water column samples on the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis, mysid shrimp Mysidopsis bahia, and a fish Menidia beryllina. Sediment/water samples were composited and tested from Areas B and Area C. Toxicity was not observed at from either of the Areas. | ||||
Data Reference: | Regional Harbor Monitoring Program Pilot Project 2005-06 | ||||
Regional Harbor Monitoring Program Pilot Project 2006-07 | |||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | From the Basin Plan on toxicity, all waters shall be free of toxic substances that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life.
From the Basin Plan on pesticides, no individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in the water column, sediments or biota at concentration(s) that adversely affect beneficial uses. Pesticides shall not be present at levels which will bioaccumulate in aquatic organisms to levels which are harmful to human health, wildlife or aquatic organisms (RWQCB, 2007). |
||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The threshold for toxicity was a No Effect Concentration (NOEC) less than 100 %. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Extent and Magnitude of Copper Contamination in Marinas of the San Diego Region, California. Technical Report 483 | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected both at west basin channel and east basin channel of Dana Point Harbor | ||||
Temporal Representation: | All samples were collected on August 23, 2006. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Kinnetic Laboratories conducts all activities in accordance with formal QA/QC procedures. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | County of Orange. Dredge Material Evaluation, Dana Point Harbor Maintenance Dredging | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 26498 | ||||
Pollutant: | Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 5 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 5 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Five upper water column water samples were tested for toxicity on mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. Toxicity was observed at all five sampling locations. | ||||
Data Reference: | Regional Harbor Monitoring Program Pilot Project 2005-06 | ||||
Regional Harbor Monitoring Program Pilot Project 2006-07 | |||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | From the Basin Plan on toxicity, all waters shall be free of toxic substances that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life.
From the Basin Plan on pesticides, no individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in the water column, sediments or biota at concentration(s) that adversely affect beneficial uses. Pesticides shall not be present at levels which will bioaccumulate in aquatic organisms to levels which are harmful to human health, wildlife or aquatic organisms (RWQCB, 2007). |
||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The threshold for toxicity was less than 80% development relative to the control test species (Schiff et al, 2006). | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Extent and Magnitude of Copper Contamination in Marinas of the San Diego Region, California. Technical Report 483 | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Five stations were sampled in Dana Point Harbor. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | All samples were collected on August 15, 2005. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP. 2005. Quality Assurance Project Plan, Marina Copper Monitoring Study. SWRCB Agreement No. 04-236-190-0. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. August 2005. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Project Plan, Marina Copper Monitoring Study. SWRCB Agreement No. 04-236-190-0. A | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 26495 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 5 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Five sediment samples were tested for toxicity using amphipod Eohaustorius estuaris. Toxicity was not observed at all five sampling locations. | ||||
Data Reference: | Regional Harbor Monitoring Program Pilot Project 2005-06 | ||||
Regional Harbor Monitoring Program Pilot Project 2006-07 | |||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | From the Basin Plan on toxicity, all waters shall be free of toxic substances that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (RWQCB, 2007). From the Basin Plan on pesticides, no individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in the water column, sediments or biota at concentration(s) that adversely affect beneficial uses. Pesticides shall not be present at levels which will bioaccumulate in aquatic organisms to levels which are harmful to human health, wildlife or aquatic organisms
(RWQCB, 2007). |
||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The threshold for toxicity was less than 80% survival relative to the control test species (Weston, 2006). | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Regional Harbor Monitoring Program Pilot Project 2005-06 | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Five stations were sampled in Dana Point Harbor. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on August 31, 2005 and August 21, 2006. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Weston Solutions. 2005. Quality Assurance Project Plan for San Diego Regional Harbor Monitoring Program Pilot Project. Prepared for the Port of San Diego, City of San Diego, City of Oceanside, and County of Orange. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Project Plan for San Diego Regional Harbor Monitoring Program Pilot Project. | ||||
DECISION ID |
16407 |
Region 9 |
Dana Point Harbor |
||
Pollutant: | Zinc |
Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Sources: | Marinas and Recreational Boating | Source Unknown | Unknown Nonpoint Source | Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers |
Expected TMDL Completion Date: | 2019 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Two of the 19 samples exceed the water quality objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Two of 19 samples exceed the Sediment ERL/ERM valuse and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
USEPA Action (if applicable): | USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 26490 | ||||
Pollutant: | Zinc | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 14 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Chemical monitoring of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Eight samples collected in the West Basin Channel (Area B) and six samples collected from the East Basin Channel (Area C). None of the 14 samples exceed the ERM or ERL. | ||||
Data Reference: | Regional Harbor Monitoring Program Pilot Project 2005-06 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin, 2007 (RWQCB, 2007). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Effects Range Median (ERM) and Effects Range Low (ERL) for zinc (Long, et, al., 1995). The ERM for zinc is 410 μg/g dry weight and the ERL is 150 μg/g dry weight | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentrations in marine and estuary sediments. Environmental Management. 19, (1): 81-97 | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected both at West Basin Channel and East Basin Channel of Dana Point Harbor | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on August 23, 2006. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Kinnetic Laboratories conducts all activities in accordance with formal QA/QC procedures. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 26489 | ||||
Pollutant: | Zinc | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 5 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 2 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Chemical monitoring of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Five samples were collected in the Dana Point harbor. Two of the five samples exceed the ERL for zinc. None of the samples exceed the ERM. | ||||
Data Reference: | Regional Harbor Monitoring Program Pilot Project 2005-06 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin, 2007 (RWQCB, 2007). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Effects Range Median (ERM) and Effects Range Low (ERL) for zinc (Long, et, al., 1995). The ERM for zinc is 410 & 956ug/g dry weight and the ERL is 150 & 956ug/g dry weight | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentrations in marine and estuary sediments. Environmental Management. 19, (1): 81-97 | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected both at West Basin Channel and East Basin Channel of Dana Point Harbor | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on August 2005 and 2006. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Kinnetic Laboratories conducts all activities in accordance with formal QA/QC procedures. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||