Final California 2010 Integrated Report (303(d) List/305(b) Report)

Supporting Information

Regional Board 3 - Central Coast Region

Water Body Name:	Pajaro River
Water Body ID:	CAR3051003019980826115152
Water Body Type:	River & Stream

DECISION ID	5499	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Boron
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	Agriculture | Other Urban Runoff | Saltwater Intrusion | Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2021
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for removal from the section 303(d) list under section 4.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 4.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess delisting status. Three lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Two lines of evidence are assessed: LOE #1850 is disregarded and replaced by LOE #9356 because LOE #9356 contains all of the information in LOE #1850, as well as additional information collected monthly between March 2002 and December 2006. LOE #1850 is not included in the current assessment. A total of 30 of 112 samples exceed the Agricultural Supply water quality objective. However, twenty three of these exceedances occur at the most downstream monitoring location (305THU - Pajaro River at Thuwatcher Road). This data is summarized in LOE #9356. Upstream monitoring shows (monthly monitoring between January 2005 and March 2006) Boron concentrations were at or slightly above the Agricultural Supply water quality objective in July and August sampling events only. Therefore, staff recommend that the length of this impairment be restricted to the Pajaro River downstream of Main Street (and the city of Watsonville). Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. A total of 30 of 112 samples exceed the Agricultural Supply water quality objective and this exceeds the allowable frequency calculated from the equation in Table 4.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.
USEPA Action (if applicable):	USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5499, Boron Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	1850
Pollutant:	Boron
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	16
Number of Exceedances:	10
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Ten out of 16 samples exceeded the water quality objective for agricultural water use/irrigation supply for boron (CCAMP, 2004; SWAMP, 2004).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. In addition, waters used for irrigation and livestock watering shall not exceed concentrations for those chemicals listed in Table 3-4 (Region 3 Basin Plan, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all inland surface waters, enclosed bay, and estuaries, page III-5). In Table 3-4 of the Basin Plan (page III-9), the maximum concentration for boron for irrigation supply is 0.75 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected from one site.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected from January 2001 through March 2002.
Environmental Conditions:	The water body is located in Pajaro River Hydrologic Unit, Watsonville Hydrologic Subarea. The monitoring site is located on the Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge (305THU).
QAPP Information:	CCAMP, SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5499, Boron Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	9356
Pollutant:	Boron
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	52
Number of Exceedances:	23
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 23 of 52 samples exceed the criterion for Boron, dissolved.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. In addition, waters used for irrigation and livestock watering shall not exceed concentrations for those chemicals listed in Table 3.4 (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). Table 3-4 (page III-9) lists the maximum concentration for boron for irrigation supply is 0.75 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/26/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 5499, Boron Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	9302
Pollutant:	Boron
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	60
Number of Exceedances:	7
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 7 of 60 samples exceed the criterion for Boron, dissolved.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. In addition, waters used for irrigation and livestock watering shall not exceed concentrations for those chemicals listed in Table 3.4 (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). Table 3-4 (page III-9) lists the maximum concentration for boron for irrigation supply is 0.75 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 1/24/2005-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	6152	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Fecal Coliform
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	Collection System Failure | Natural Sources | Onsite Wastewater Systems (Septic Tanks) | Pasture Grazing-Riparian and/or Upland | Transient encampments | Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2011
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for removal from the section 303(d) list under section 4.3 of the Listing Policy. Under section 4.3 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess delisting status. Five lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. However, only four lines of evidence are assessed because LOE #3994 is a placeholder for the original listing and staff are unable to reconstruct data and information used to support this listing. Four lines of evidence for Pajaro River include monthly data from six sites throughout the watershed. Fifty-two of 193 samples exceed the Water Contact Recreation water quality objective. The Pajaro River Fecal Coliform TMDL (including Pajaro River, San Benito River, Llagas Creek and Tequisquita Slough) was approved by the Central Coast Regional Board on March 20, 2009 and is currently awaiting to be heard by the State Board. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Fifty-two of 193 samples exceed the Water Contact Recreation water quality objective and this exceeds the allowable frequency calculated from the equation in Table 4.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded. In addition the impaired reach should be changed to include the entire River.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
USEPA Action (if applicable):	USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6152, Fecal Coliform Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	10131
Pollutant:	Fecal Coliform
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Water Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	136
Number of Exceedances:	38
Data and Information Type:	PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 38 of 136 samples exceed the criterion for Coliform, Fecal.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for water contact recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: Fecal coliform concentration, based on a minimum of not less than five samples for any 30-day period, shall not exceed a log mean of 200 MPN/100 ml, nor shall more than ten percent of total samples during any 30-day period exceed 400 MPN/100 ml.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 5 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/18/1997-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6152, Fecal Coliform Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	10261
Pollutant:	Fecal Coliform
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Water Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	57
Number of Exceedances:	14
Data and Information Type:	PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 14 of 57 samples exceed the criterion for Coliform, Fecal.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for water contact recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: Fecal coliform concentration, based on a minimum of not less than five samples for any 30-day period, shall not exceed a log mean of 200 MPN/100 ml, nor shall more than ten percent of total samples during any 30-day period exceed 400 MPN/100 ml.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/26/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6152, Fecal Coliform Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	10262
Pollutant:	Fecal Coliform
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Non-Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	57
Number of Exceedances:	4
Data and Information Type:	PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 4 of 57 samples exceed the criterion for Coliform, Fecal.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: Fecal coliform concentration, based on a minimum of not less than five samples for any 30-day period, shall not exceed a log mean of 2000/100 ml, nor shall more than ten percent of samples collected during any 30-day period exceed 4000/100 ml.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/26/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6152, Fecal Coliform Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	10385
Pollutant:	Fecal Coliform
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Non-Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	136
Number of Exceedances:	9
Data and Information Type:	PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 9 of 136 samples exceed the criterion for Coliform, Fecal.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: Fecal coliform concentration, based on a minimum of not less than five samples for any 30-day period, shall not exceed a log mean of 2000/100 ml, nor shall more than ten percent of samples collected during any 30-day period exceed 4000/100 ml.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 5 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/18/1997-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6152, Fecal Coliform Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	3994
Pollutant:	Fecal Coliform
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Not Recorded
Beneficial Use:	Water Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	0
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006.
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d)
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Unspecified
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:	Unspecified
Guideline Reference:	Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d)
Spatial Representation:	Unspecified
Temporal Representation:	Unspecified
Environmental Conditions:	Unspecified
QAPP Information:	Unspecified
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	6020	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Nitrate
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed with USEPA approved TMDL)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)(2006)
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	Agriculture | Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers
TMDL Name:	Pajaro River Nitrate (including Llagas Creek) TMDL
TMDL Project Code:	139
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA:	10/13/2006
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	The USEPA final decision on the 2006 303(d) list was to add this listing to the being addressed by a USEPA approved TMDL portion of the 303(d) list, because the Pajaro River Nutrients (including Llagas Creek ) was approved by USEPA on 10/13/06 (USEPA, 2007). Prior to this, Nitrate was not specifically listed on the 303(d) list. This pollutant is being considered for removal from the section 303(d) list under section 4.1 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Thirteen lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. However, only 12 lines of evidence are assessed because LOE #1853 is a placeholder for the original listing (made by USEPA, see above) and staff are unable to reconstruct data and information used to support this listing. Twelve lines of evidence for Pajaro River include data from 21 sites throughout the watershed. A total of 456 of the 1711 samples exceed the Municipal and Domestic Supply water quality objective. In addition, 3 of the 1711 samples also exceed the Agricultural Supply water quality objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list and these data support EPA's decision to add this waterbody segment-pollutant combination to the being addressed by a TMDL section of the 303(d) list. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. A total of 456 of the 1711 samples exceed the Municipal and Domestic Supply water quality objective and this exceeds the allowable frequency calculated from the equation in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6020, Nitrate Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	19649
Pollutant:	Nitrate
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	6
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Monitoring Program (R3_SCCEH) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate as N.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1971-1996
	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1997-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when nitrate exceeds 30 mg/L NO3 as N in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ_SCC - PAJARO R at CHITTENDEN PASS, 305PMO_SCC - PAJARO R at MOUTH]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 9/7/2000-4/3/2003.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	This monitoring program has been underway for thirty years, with changes over time to protocols, level of QA, and documentation. In general, QA documentation included with the dataset is minimal. However, data quality appears to be reasonably good.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6020, Nitrate Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	19650
Pollutant:	Nitrate
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	6
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Monitoring Program (R3_SCCEH) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate as N.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1971-1996
	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1997-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin Objective for municipal and domestic supply uses of inland surface waters (Section II.A.2) states the following: waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the limits specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Article 4, Chapter 15, Section 64435, Tables 2 and 3 as listed in Table 3-2. The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 3-2 (inorganic and fluoride concentrations not to be exceeded in domestic or municipal supply) for nitrate is 10.0 mg/L (NO3 as N).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Title 22, Division 4, Ch. 15, Article 4, Section 64431, Table 64431-A
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ_SCC - PAJARO R at CHITTENDEN PASS, 305PMO_SCC - PAJARO R at MOUTH]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 9/7/2000-4/3/2003.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	This monitoring program has been underway for thirty years, with changes over time to protocols, level of QA, and documentation. In general, QA documentation included with the dataset is minimal. However, data quality appears to be reasonably good.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6020, Nitrate Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	1853
Pollutant:	Nitrate
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Not Recorded
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	0
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006.
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:
Objective/Criterion Reference:
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:
Temporal Representation:
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	QA Info Missing
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6020, Nitrate Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	9352
Pollutant:	Nitrate
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	59
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 59 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate as N.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when nitrate exceeds 30 mg/L NO3 as N in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/26/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6020, Nitrate Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	9353
Pollutant:	Nitrate
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	59
Number of Exceedances:	5
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 5 of 59 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate as N.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin Objective for municipal and domestic supply uses of inland surface waters (Section II.A.2) states the following: waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the limits specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Article 4, Chapter 15, Section 64435, Tables 2 and 3 as listed in Table 3-2. The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 3-2 (inorganic and fluoride concentrations not to be exceeded in domestic or municipal supply) for nitrate is 10.0 mg/L (NO3 as N).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Title 22, Division 4, Ch. 15, Article 4, Section 64431, Table 64431-A
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/26/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6020, Nitrate Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	9298
Pollutant:	Nitrate
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	140
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 140 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate as N.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when nitrate exceeds 30 mg/L NO3 as N in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 5 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/18/1997-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6020, Nitrate Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	9299
Pollutant:	Nitrate
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	140
Number of Exceedances:	13
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 13 of 140 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate as N.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin Objective for municipal and domestic supply uses of inland surface waters (Section II.A.2) states the following: waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the limits specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Article 4, Chapter 15, Section 64435, Tables 2 and 3 as listed in Table 3-2. The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 3-2 (inorganic and fluoride concentrations not to be exceeded in domestic or municipal supply) for nitrate is 10.0 mg/L (NO3 as N).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Title 22, Division 4, Ch. 15, Article 4, Section 64431, Table 64431-A
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 5 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/18/1997-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6020, Nitrate Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	13917
Pollutant:	Nitrate
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	39
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Central Coast Long Term Environmental Assessment Program (R3_CCLEAN) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 39 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate as N.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCLEAN (Central Coast Long Term Environmental Assessment Program data) Water Quality Data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin Objective for municipal and domestic supply uses of inland surface waters (Section II.A.2) states the following: waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the limits specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Article 4, Chapter 15, Section 64435, Tables 2 and 3 as listed in Table 3-2. The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 3-2 (inorganic and fluoride concentrations not to be exceeded in domestic or municipal supply) for nitrate is 10.0 mg/L (NO3 as N).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Title 22, Division 4, Ch. 15, Article 4, Section 64431, Table 64431-A
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PAJ_CCL - Pajaro River at Thurwachter]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 1/25/2002-6/20/2005.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	EPA Approved QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6020, Nitrate Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	13916
Pollutant:	Nitrate
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	39
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Central Coast Long Term Environmental Assessment Program (R3_CCLEAN) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 39 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate as N.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCLEAN (Central Coast Long Term Environmental Assessment Program data) Water Quality Data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when nitrate exceeds 30 mg/L NO3 as N in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PAJ_CCL - Pajaro River at Thurwachter]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 1/25/2002-6/20/2005.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	EPA Approved QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6020, Nitrate Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17956
Pollutant:	Nitrate
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	1464
Number of Exceedances:	437
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 437 of 1464 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate as N.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin Objective for municipal and domestic supply uses of inland surface waters (Section II.A.2) states the following: waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the limits specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Article 4, Chapter 15, Section 64435, Tables 2 and 3 as listed in Table 3-2. The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 3-2 (inorganic and fluoride concentrations not to be exceeded in domestic or municipal supply) for nitrate is 10.0 mg/L (NO3 as N).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Title 22, Division 4, Ch. 15, Article 4, Section 64431, Table 64431-A
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 24 monitoring sites [ PA-BET - Pajaro River at Betabel Road, PA-CHI - Pajaro River at Chittenden, PA-MUR - Pajaro River at Murphy's, PA-19, PA-20, PA-H25 PA-MNS - Pajaro River at Main, PA-21, PA-22, PA-ONF PA-23, PA-24, PA-26, PA-13, PA-27, PA-UVAS PA-14, PA-29, PA-15, PA-30, PA-16, PA-31, PA-18, PA-FLR - Pajaro River at Frazer Lake Rd.]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 10/4/2000-3/13/2007.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6020, Nitrate Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17942
Pollutant:	Nitrate
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	1464
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 1464 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate as N.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when nitrate exceeds 30 mg/L NO3 as N in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 24 monitoring sites [ PA-BET - Pajaro River at Betabel Road, PA-CHI - Pajaro River at Chittenden, PA-MUR - Pajaro River at Murphy's, PA-19, PA-20, PA-H25 PA-MNS - Pajaro River at Main, PA-21, PA-22, PA-ONF PA-23, PA-24, PA-26, PA-13, PA-27, PA-UVAS PA-14, PA-29, PA-15, PA-30, PA-16, PA-31, PA-18, PA-FLR - Pajaro River at Frazer Lake Rd.]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 10/4/2000-3/13/2007.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6020, Nitrate Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	18448
Pollutant:	Nitrate
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	3
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Coastal Watershed Council (Snapshot day monitoring) (R3_Snap) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate as N.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Volunteer Monitoring Network Data. 2003-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when nitrate exceeds 30 mg/L NO3 as N in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305-PAJAR-21 - Pajaro River under Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 5/17/2003-5/7/2005. Coastal Watershed Council Snapshot Day Monitoring is conducted annually.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	State Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6020, Nitrate Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	18449
Pollutant:	Nitrate
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	3
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Coastal Watershed Council (Snapshot day monitoring) (R3_Snap) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate as N.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Volunteer Monitoring Network Data. 2003-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin Objective for municipal and domestic supply uses of inland surface waters (Section II.A.2) states the following: waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the limits specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Article 4, Chapter 15, Section 64435, Tables 2 and 3 as listed in Table 3-2. The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 3-2 (inorganic and fluoride concentrations not to be exceeded in domestic or municipal supply) for nitrate is 10.0 mg/L (NO3 as N).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Title 22, Division 4, Ch. 15, Article 4, Section 64431, Table 64431-A
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305-PAJAR-21 - Pajaro River under Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 5/17/2003-5/7/2005. Coastal Watershed Council Snapshot Day Monitoring is conducted annually.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	State Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14665	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Ammonia (Unionized)
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Three lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Three of the 198 samples exceed the General water quality objective as it applies to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Three of the 198 samples exceed the General water quality objective as it applies to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14665, Ammonia (Unionized) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	13842
Pollutant:	Ammonia (Unionized)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	6
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia as N, Unionized.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 (General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries) states that the discharge of wastes shall not cause concentrations of unionized ammonia (NH3) to exceed 0.025 mg/l (as N) in receiving waters (page III-4) .
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-5/19/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14665, Ammonia (Unionized) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	9297
Pollutant:	Ammonia (Unionized)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	136
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 136 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia as N, Unionized.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 (General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries) states that the discharge of wastes shall not cause concentrations of unionized ammonia (NH3) to exceed 0.025 mg/l (as N) in receiving waters (page III-4) .
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	5 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy’s Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge].
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/18/1997-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14665, Ammonia (Unionized) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	9354
Pollutant:	Ammonia (Unionized)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	56
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 56 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia as N, Unionized.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 (General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries) states that the discharge of wastes shall not cause concentrations of unionized ammonia (NH3) to exceed 0.025 mg/l (as N) in receiving waters (page III-4) .
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge].
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/26/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14665, Ammonia (Unionized) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	9355
Pollutant:	Ammonia (Unionized)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	56
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 56 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia as N, Unionized.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 (General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries) states that the discharge of wastes shall not cause concentrations of unionized ammonia (NH3) to exceed 0.025 mg/l (as N) in receiving waters (page III-4) .
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge].
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/26/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14665, Ammonia (Unionized) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	13841
Pollutant:	Ammonia (Unionized)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	6
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia as N, Unionized.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 (General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries) states that the discharge of wastes shall not cause concentrations of unionized ammonia (NH3) to exceed 0.025 mg/l (as N) in receiving waters (page III-4) .
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-5/19/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14665, Ammonia (Unionized) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	9296
Pollutant:	Ammonia (Unionized)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	136
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 136 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia as N, Unionized.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 (General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries) states that the discharge of wastes shall not cause concentrations of unionized ammonia (NH3) to exceed 0.025 mg/l (as N) in receiving waters (page III-4) .
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	5 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy’s Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge].
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/18/1997-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14667	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Anthracene
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in adding that pollutant to the Section 303(d) list. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because the sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14667, Anthracene Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	15622
Pollutant:	Anthracene
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Anthracene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for anthracene is 845 ug/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14667, Anthracene Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	15621
Pollutant:	Anthracene
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Anthracene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for anthracene is 845 ug/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14668	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Arsenic
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in adding that pollutant to the Section 303(d) list. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because the sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14668, Arsenic Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	15705
Pollutant:	Arsenic
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Arsenic.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for arsenic is 33 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14668, Arsenic Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	15704
Pollutant:	Arsenic
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Arsenic.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for arsenic is 33 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14670	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Benzo(a)anthracene
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in adding that pollutant to the Section 303(d) list. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because the sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14670, Benzo(a)anthracene Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	15760
Pollutant:	Benzo(a)anthracene
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Benzo(a)anthracene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for Benzo(a)anthracene is 1050 ug/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14670, Benzo(a)anthracene Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	15759
Pollutant:	Benzo(a)anthracene
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Benzo(a)anthracene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for Benzo(a)anthracene is 1050 ug/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14669	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Benzo(a)pyrene (3,4-Benzopyrene -7-d)
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in adding that pollutant to the Section 303(d) list. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because the sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14669, Benzo(a)pyrene (3,4-Benzopyrene -7-d) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	15388
Pollutant:	Benzo(a)pyrene (3,4-Benzopyrene -7-d)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Benzo(a)pyrene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for Benzo(a)Pyrene is 1450 ug/Kg dry weight (Macdonald et al. 2000)
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14669, Benzo(a)pyrene (3,4-Benzopyrene -7-d) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	15389
Pollutant:	Benzo(a)pyrene (3,4-Benzopyrene -7-d)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Benzo(a)pyrene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for Benzo(a)Pyrene is 1450 ug/Kg dry weight (Macdonald et al. 2000)
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14671	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Cadmium
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in adding that pollutant to the Section 303(d) list. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because the sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14671, Cadmium Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	15489
Pollutant:	Cadmium
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Cadmium.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for cadmium is 4.98 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14671, Cadmium Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	15490
Pollutant:	Cadmium
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Cadmium.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for cadmium is 4.98 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14672	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Carbofuran
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 4 samples exceed the Municipal & Domestic Supply water quality objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 4 samples exceed the Municipal & Domestic Supply water quality objective and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are not exceeded.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14672, Carbofuran Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	18778
Pollutant:	Carbofuran
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Department of Health Services (R3_DHS1) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for carbofuran.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 1 (feb06)
	Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 2 (sed06)
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All inland surface waters, enclosed bays, and estuaries shall not contain concentrations of organic chemicals in excess of the limiting concentrations set forth in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Chapter 15, Article 5.5, Section 64444.5, Table 5 and listed in Table 3-1 of the Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Municipal and Domestic Supply Objective. Table 3-1 states that Carbofuran shall not exceed 18.0 ug/L (page III-6).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Title 22, Division 4, Ch. 15, Article 4, Section 64431, Table 64431-A
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ DHS006 - Pajaro River @ Railroad Bridge, DHS007 - Pajaro River downstream of the ditch draining]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/13/1994-1/27/1995.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	No QAPP was provided for this data set.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14678	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Chromium (total)
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in adding that pollutant to the Section 303(d) list. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample did exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample did exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because the sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14678, Chromium (total) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	15944
Pollutant:	Chromium (total)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Chromium.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for chromium is 111 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14678, Chromium (total) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	15931
Pollutant:	Chromium (total)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Chromium.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for chromium is 111 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14680	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Chrysene (C1-C4)
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in adding that pollutant to the Section 303(d) list. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because the sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14680, Chrysene (C1-C4) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16029
Pollutant:	Chrysene (C1-C4)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Chrysene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for Chrysene is 1290 ug/Kg dry weight (Macdonald et al. 2000)
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14680, Chrysene (C1-C4) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16028
Pollutant:	Chrysene (C1-C4)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Chrysene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for Chrysene is 1290 ug/Kg dry weight (Macdonald et al. 2000)
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14681	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Copper
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in adding that pollutant to the Section 303(d) list. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because the sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14681, Copper Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	15860
Pollutant:	Copper
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Copper.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for cooper is 149 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14681, Copper Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16099
Pollutant:	Copper
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Copper.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for cooper is 149 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14682	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Diazinon
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Eight lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 17 samples exceed the Evaluation Guideline (Sipmann and Finlayson, 2000) applied to protect for aquatic life beneficial uses. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 17 samples exceed the Evaluation Guideline (Sipmann and Finlayson, 2000) applied to protect for aquatic life beneficial uses and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14682, Diazinon Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	18732
Pollutant:	Diazinon
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Department of Health Services (R3_DHS1) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for diazinon.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 1 (feb06)
	Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 2 (sed06)
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	One hour average maximum concentration 0.16 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000).
Guideline Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ DHS006 - Pajaro River @ Railroad Bridge, DHS007 - Pajaro River downstream of the ditch draining]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/13/1994-1/27/1995.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	No QAPP was provided for this data set.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14682, Diazinon Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	18731
Pollutant:	Diazinon
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Department of Health Services (R3_DHS1) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for diazinon.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 1 (feb06)
	Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 2 (sed06)
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	One hour average maximum concentration 0.16 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000).
Guideline Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ DHS006 - Pajaro River @ Railroad Bridge, DHS007 - Pajaro River downstream of the ditch draining]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/13/1994-1/27/1995.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	No QAPP was provided for this data set.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14682, Diazinon Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16739
Pollutant:	Diazinon
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Diazinon.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	One hour average maximum concentration 0.16 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000).
Guideline Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14682, Diazinon Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16740
Pollutant:	Diazinon
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Diazinon.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	One hour average maximum concentration 0.16 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000).
Guideline Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14682, Diazinon Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16624
Pollutant:	Diazinon
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	8
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceed the criterion for Diazinon.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	One hour average maximum concentration 0.16 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000).
Guideline Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ001 - Pajaro River at Y Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 1/10/2006-5/30/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14682, Diazinon Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16611
Pollutant:	Diazinon
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for Diazinon.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	One hour average maximum concentration 0.16 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000).
Guideline Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 3 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ001 - Pajaro River at Y Road, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 5/3/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14682, Diazinon Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16610
Pollutant:	Diazinon
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for Diazinon.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	One hour average maximum concentration 0.16 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000).
Guideline Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 3 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ001 - Pajaro River at Y Road, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 5/3/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14682, Diazinon Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16638
Pollutant:	Diazinon
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	8
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceed the criterion for Diazinon.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	One hour average maximum concentration 0.16 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000).
Guideline Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ001 - Pajaro River at Y Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 1/10/2006-5/30/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14687	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Electrical Conductivity
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Seven lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Thirty-nine of the 1026 samples exceed the Agricultural Supply water quality objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Thirty-nine of the 1026 samples exceed the Agricultural Supply water quality objective and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14687, Electrical Conductivity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17479
Pollutant:	Electrical Conductivity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Coastal Watershed Council (Snapshot day monitoring) (R3_Snap) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Conductivity(ms).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Volunteer Monitoring Network Data. 2003-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when conductivity exceeds 3.0 mS/cm in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305-PAJAR-21 - Pajaro River under Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 5/7/2005. Coastal Watershed Council Snapshot Day Monitoring is conducted annually.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	State Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14687, Electrical Conductivity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17493
Pollutant:	Electrical Conductivity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	816
Number of Exceedances:	10
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 10 of 816 samples exceed the criterion for Conductivity(Us).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when conductivity exceeds 3.0 mS/cm in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 6 monitoring sites [ PA-CHI - Pajaro River at Chittenden, PA-BET - Pajaro River at Betabel Road, PA-MUR - Pajaro River at Murphy's, PA-H25 PA-MNS - Pajaro River at Main, PA-FLR - Pajaro River at Frazer Lake Rd.]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 10/4/2000-11/2/2004.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14687, Electrical Conductivity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	11139
Pollutant:	Electrical Conductivity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	58
Number of Exceedances:	17
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 17 of 58 samples exceed the criterion for Conductivity(Us).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when conductivity exceeds 3.0 mS/cm in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/26/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14687, Electrical Conductivity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	10119
Pollutant:	Electrical Conductivity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	9
Number of Exceedances:	3
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 9 samples exceed the criterion for Conductivity(Us).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when conductivity exceeds 3.0 mS/cm in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 7/6/2001-8/31/2005. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14687, Electrical Conductivity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	10386
Pollutant:	Electrical Conductivity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	132
Number of Exceedances:	5
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 5 of 132 samples exceed the criterion for Conductivity(Us).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when conductivity exceeds 3.0 mS/cm in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 5 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/18/1997-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14687, Electrical Conductivity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	19785
Pollutant:	Electrical Conductivity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	7
Number of Exceedances:	3
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Monitoring Program (R3_SCCEH) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Conductivity(Us).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1971-1996
	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1997-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when conductivity exceeds 3.0 mS/cm in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ_SCC - PAJARO R at CHITTENDEN PASS, 305PMO_SCC - PAJARO R at MOUTH]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 9/7/2000-4/3/2003.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	This monitoring program has been underway for thirty years, with changes over time to protocols, level of QA, and documentation. In general, QA documentation included with the dataset is minimal. However, data quality appears to be reasonably good.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14687, Electrical Conductivity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17626
Pollutant:	Electrical Conductivity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	3
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Coastal Watershed Council (Snapshot day monitoring) (R3_Snap) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceed the criterion for Conductivity(Us).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Volunteer Monitoring Network Data. 2003-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when conductivity exceeds 3.0 mS/cm in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305-PAJAR-21 - Pajaro River under Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 5/17/2003-5/6/2006. Coastal Watershed Council Snapshot Day Monitoring is conducted annually.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	State Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14688	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Endrin
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in adding that pollutant to the Section 303(d) list. Three lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sediment sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. In addition, none of the four water samples exceed the Municipal & Domestic Supply water quality objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sediment sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. In addition, none of the four water samples exceed the Municipal & Domestic Supply water quality objective. Neither of these exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are not exceeded.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14688, Endrin Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16386
Pollutant:	Endrin
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Endrin.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for endrin is 207 ug/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14688, Endrin Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16385
Pollutant:	Endrin
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Endrin.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for endrin is 207 ug/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14688, Endrin Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	18756
Pollutant:	Endrin
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Department of Health Services (R3_DHS1) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for endrin.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 1 (feb06)
	Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 2 (sed06)
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All inland surface waters, enclosed bays, and estuaries shall not contain concentrations of organic chemicals in excess of the limiting concentrations set forth in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Chapter 15, Article 5.5, Section 64444.5, Table 5 and listed in Table 3-1 of the Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Municipal and Domestic Supply Objective. Table 3-1 states that Endrin shall not exceed 0.2 ug/L (page III-6).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Title 22, Division 4, Ch. 15, Article 4, Section 64431, Table 64431-A
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ DHS006 - Pajaro River @ Railroad Bridge, DHS007 - Pajaro River downstream of the ditch draining]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/13/1994-1/27/1995.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	No QAPP was provided for this data set.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14689	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Enterococcus
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.3 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.3 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Three of the 39 samples exceed the Evaluation Guideline (USEPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria, 1986) as it applies to the Water Contact Recreation beneficial use. None of the 39 Enterococcus samples exceed the water quality objective for Non-Contact Recreation. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Three of the 39 samples exceed the Evaluation Guideline (USEPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria, 1986) as it applies to the Water Contact Recreation beneficial use. None of the 39 samples exceed the water quality objective for Non-Contact Recreation. Neither of these exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14689, Enterococcus Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	14150
Pollutant:	Enterococcus
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Water Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	39
Number of Exceedances:	3
Data and Information Type:	PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Central Coast Long Term Environmental Assessment Program (R3_CCLEAN) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 39 samples exceed the EPA criterion for Enterococci.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCLEAN (Central Coast Long Term Environmental Assessment Program data) Water Quality Data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	USEPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria -1986.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria - 1986. EPA440/5-84-002
Evaluation Guideline:	Single sample maximum allowable density for Enterococci in freshwater is 61 MPN/100mL (as stated in Table 4, page 15).
Guideline Reference:	Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria - 1986. EPA440/5-84-002
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PAJ_CCL - Pajaro River at Thurwachter].
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected monthly over the time period 1/25/2002-6/20/2005.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	EPA Approved QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14689, Enterococcus Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	14151
Pollutant:	Enterococcus
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Non-Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	39
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Central Coast Long Term Environmental Assessment Program (R3_CCLEAN) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 39 samples exceed the criterion for Enterococci.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCLEAN (Central Coast Long Term Environmental Assessment Program data) Water Quality Data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: Fecal coliform concentration, based on a minimum of not less than five samples for any 30-day period, shall not exceed a log mean of 2000/100 ml, nor shall more than ten percent of samples collected during any 30-day period exceed 4000/100 ml. Enterococcus is a fecal coliform.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PAJ_CCL - Pajaro River at Thurwachter]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 1/25/2002-6/20/2005.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	EPA Approved QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14692	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Fluoranthene
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in adding that pollutant to the Section 303(d) list. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because the sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14692, Fluoranthene Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16471
Pollutant:	Fluoranthene
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Fluoranthene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for Fluoranthene is 2,230 ug/Kg dry weight (Macdonald et al. 2000)
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14692, Fluoranthene Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16470
Pollutant:	Fluoranthene
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Fluoranthene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for Fluoranthene is 2,230 ug/Kg dry weight (Macdonald et al. 2000)
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14693	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Fluorene
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in adding that pollutant to the Section 303(d) list. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because the sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14693, Fluorene Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16588
Pollutant:	Fluorene
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Fluorene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for fluorene is 536 ug/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14693, Fluorene Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16587
Pollutant:	Fluorene
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Fluorene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for fluorene is 536 ug/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14694	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Heptachlor
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 4 samples exceed the Municipal and Domestic Supply water quality objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 4 samples exceed the Municipal and Domestic Supply water quality objective and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are not exceeded.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14694, Heptachlor Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	18770
Pollutant:	Heptachlor
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Department of Health Services (R3_DHS1) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for heptachlor.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 1 (feb06)
	Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 2 (sed06)
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All inland surface waters, enclosed bays, and estuaries shall not contain concentrations of organic chemicals in excess of the limiting concentrations set forth in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Chapter 15, Article 5.5, Section 64444.5, Table 5 and listed in Table 3-1 of the Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Municipal and Domestic Supply Objective. Table 3-1 states that Heptachlor shall not exceed 0.01 ug/L (page III-6).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Title 22, Division 4, Ch. 15, Article 4, Section 64431, Table 64431-A
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ DHS006 - Pajaro River @ Railroad Bridge, DHS007 - Pajaro River downstream of the ditch draining]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/13/1994-1/27/1995.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	No QAPP was provided for this data set.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14695	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Heptachlor epoxide
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 4 samples exceed the Municipal and Domestic Supply water quality objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 4 samples exceed the Municipal and Domestic Supply water quality objective and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are not exceeded.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14695, Heptachlor epoxide Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	18771
Pollutant:	Heptachlor epoxide
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Department of Health Services (R3_DHS1) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for heptachlor epoxide.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 1 (feb06)
	Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 2 (sed06)
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All inland surface waters, enclosed bays, and estuaries shall not contain concentrations of organic chemicals in excess of the limiting concentrations set forth in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Chapter 15, Article 5.5, Section 64444.5, Table 5 and listed in Table 3-1 of the Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Municipal and Domestic Supply Objective. Table 3-1 states that Heptachlor Epoxide shall not exceed 0.01 ug/L (page III-6).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Title 22, Division 4, Ch. 15, Article 4, Section 64431, Table 64431-A
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ DHS006 - Pajaro River @ Railroad Bridge, DHS007 - Pajaro River downstream of the ditch draining]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/13/1994-1/27/1995.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	No QAPP was provided for this data set.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14698	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Lead
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in adding that pollutant to the Section 303(d) list. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because the sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14698, Lead Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17183
Pollutant:	Lead
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Lead.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for lead is 128 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14698, Lead Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17182
Pollutant:	Lead
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Lead.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for lead is 128 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14699	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Mercury
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in adding that pollutant to the Section 303(d) list. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because the sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14699, Mercury Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17268
Pollutant:	Mercury
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Mercury.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for mercury is 1.06 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14699, Mercury Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17267
Pollutant:	Mercury
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Mercury.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for mercury is 1.06 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14702	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Methoxychlor
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 4 samples exceed the Municipal and Domestic Supply water quality objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 4 samples exceed the Municipal and Domestic Supply water quality objective and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are not exceeded.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14702, Methoxychlor Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	18772
Pollutant:	Methoxychlor
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Department of Health Services (R3_DHS1) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for methoxychlor.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 1 (feb06)
	Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 2 (sed06)
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All inland surface waters, enclosed bays, and estuaries shall not contain concentrations of organic chemicals in excess of the limiting concentrations set forth in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Chapter 15, Article 5.5, Section 64444.5, Table 5 and listed in Table 3-1 of the Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Municipal and Domestic Supply Objective. Table 3-1 states that Methoxychlor shall not exceed 100.0 ug/L (page III-6).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Title 22, Division 4, Ch. 15, Article 4, Section 64431, Table 64431-A
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ DHS006 - Pajaro River @ Railroad Bridge, DHS007 - Pajaro River downstream of the ditch draining]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/13/1994-1/27/1995.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	No QAPP was provided for this data set.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14700	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Naphthalene
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in adding that pollutant to the Section 303(d) list. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because the sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are not exceeded.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14700, Naphthalene Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17334
Pollutant:	Naphthalene
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Naphthalene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for naphthalene is 561 ug/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14700, Naphthalene Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17321
Pollutant:	Naphthalene
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Naphthalene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for naphthalene is 561 ug/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14701	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Nickel
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in adding that pollutant to the Section 303(d) list. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample did exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample did exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because the sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14701, Nickel Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16903
Pollutant:	Nickel
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Nickel.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for nickel is 48.6 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14701, Nickel Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16902
Pollutant:	Nickel
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Nickel.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for nickel is 48.6 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14666	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia)
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Five lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 1669 samples exceed the Evaluation Guideline (EPA's Lifetime Health advisory level, 2006) applied to protect the Municipal & Domestic Supply beneficial use. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 1669 samples exceed the Evaluation Guideline (EPA's Lifetime Health advisory level, 2006) applied to protect the Municipal & Domestic Supply beneficial use and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14666, Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17583
Pollutant:	Ammonia as Nitrogen
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Coastal Watershed Council (Snapshot day monitoring) (R3_Snap) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia as N, Total.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Volunteer Monitoring Network Data. 2003-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	USEPA Health Advisory 2006 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories (EPA 822-R-06-013, 2006).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. EPA 822-R-03-013
Evaluation Guideline:	EPA's Lifetime Health advisory level for total ammonia is 30.0 mg/L as stated on page 8 of the 2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. This Advisory Level is defined as "the concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse noncarcinogenic effects for up to ten days of exposure."
Guideline Reference:	2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. EPA 822-R-03-013
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305-PAJAR-21 - Pajaro River under Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 5/17/2003. Coastal Watershed Council Snapshot Day Monitoring is conducted annually.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	State Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14666, Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	9295
Pollutant:	Ammonia as Nitrogen
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	140
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 140 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia as N, Total.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	USEPA Health Advisory 2006 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories (EPA 822-R-06-013, 2006).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. EPA 822-R-03-013
Evaluation Guideline:	EPA's Lifetime Health advisory level for total ammonia is 30.0 mg/L as stated on page 8 of the 2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. This Advisory Level is defined as "the concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse noncarcinogenic effects for up to ten days of exposure."
Guideline Reference:	2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. EPA 822-R-03-013
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 5 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/18/1997-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14666, Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17778
Pollutant:	Ammonia as Nitrogen
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	1449
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1449 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia As N, Total.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	USEPA Health Advisory 2006 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories (EPA 822-R-06-013, 2006).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. EPA 822-R-03-013
Evaluation Guideline:	EPA's Lifetime Health advisory level for total ammonia is 30.0 mg/L as stated on page 8 of the 2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. This Advisory Level is defined as "the concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse noncarcinogenic effects for up to ten days of exposure."
Guideline Reference:	2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. EPA 822-R-03-013
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 24 monitoring sites [ PA-BET - Pajaro River at Betabel Road, PA-CHI - Pajaro River at Chittenden, PA-MUR - Pajaro River at Murphy's, PA-19, PA-20, PA-H25 PA-MNS - Pajaro River at Main, PA-21, PA-22, PA-ONF PA-23, PA-24, PA-26, PA-13, PA-27, PA-UVAS PA-14, PA-29, PA-15, PA-30, PA-16, PA-31, PA-18, PA-FLR - Pajaro River at Frazer Lake Rd.]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 10/4/2000-3/13/2007.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14666, Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	9351
Pollutant:	Ammonia as Nitrogen
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	59
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 59 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia as N, Total.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	USEPA Health Advisory 2006 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories (EPA 822-R-06-013, 2006).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. EPA 822-R-03-013
Evaluation Guideline:	EPA's Lifetime Health advisory level for total ammonia is 30.0 mg/L as stated on page 8 of the 2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. This Advisory Level is defined as "the concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse noncarcinogenic effects for up to ten days of exposure."
Guideline Reference:	2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. EPA 822-R-03-013
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/26/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14666, Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	13989
Pollutant:	Ammonia as Nitrogen
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	20
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Central Coast Long Term Environmental Assessment Program (R3_CCLEAN) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 20 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia As N, Total.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCLEAN (Central Coast Long Term Environmental Assessment Program data) Water Quality Data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	USEPA Health Advisory 2006 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories (EPA 822-R-06-013, 2006).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. EPA 822-R-03-013
Evaluation Guideline:	EPA's Lifetime Health advisory level for total ammonia is 30.0 mg/L as stated on page 8 of the 2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. This Advisory Level is defined as "the concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse noncarcinogenic effects for up to ten days of exposure."
Guideline Reference:	2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. EPA 822-R-03-013
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PAJ_CCL - Pajaro River at Thurwachter]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 10/21/2003-6/20/2005.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	EPA Approved QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14703	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Phenanthrene
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in adding that pollutant to the Section 303(d) list. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because the sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14703, Phenanthrene Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17002
Pollutant:	Phenanthrene
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Phenanthrene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for Phenanthrene is 1170 ug/Kg dry weight (Macdonald et al. 2000)
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14703, Phenanthrene Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16989
Pollutant:	Phenanthrene
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Phenanthrene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for Phenanthrene is 1170 ug/Kg dry weight (Macdonald et al. 2000)
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14704	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Pyrene
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in adding that pollutant to the Section 303(d) list. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because the sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14704, Pyrene Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17119
Pollutant:	Pyrene
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Pyrene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for Pyrene is 1520 ug/Kg dry weight (Macdonald et al. 2000)
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14704, Pyrene Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17120
Pollutant:	Pyrene
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Pyrene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for Pyrene is 1520 ug/Kg dry weight (Macdonald et al. 2000)
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14696	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Sediment Toxicity
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status for toxicity. Six lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant in sediment samples. None of the samples were toxic to invertebrate test organisms (exhibit a significant increase in mortality compared to the laboratory control) and therefore do not exceed the narrative General Objective for toxicity, set to protect for aquatic life beneficial uses. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the samples were toxic to invertebrate test organisms. Therefore, this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are not exceeded.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14696, Sediment Toxicity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	24585
Pollutant:	Invertebrate Toxicity
LOE Subgroup:	Toxicity
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	TOXICITY TESTING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Hyalella azteca Survival (%) 10 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival.
Guideline Reference:	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14696, Sediment Toxicity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	24574
Pollutant:	Invertebrate Toxicity
LOE Subgroup:	Toxicity
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	TOXICITY TESTING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPnorth) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Hyalella azteca Survival (%) 10 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival.
Guideline Reference:	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 5/19/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14696, Sediment Toxicity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	24597
Pollutant:	Invertebrate Toxicity
LOE Subgroup:	Toxicity
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	3
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	TOXICITY TESTING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Hyalella azteca Survival (%) 10 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival.
Guideline Reference:	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 3 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ001 - Pajaro River at Y Road, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 5/3/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14696, Sediment Toxicity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	24584
Pollutant:	Invertebrate Toxicity
LOE Subgroup:	Toxicity
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	TOXICITY TESTING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPnorth) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Hyalella azteca Survival (%) 10 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival.
Guideline Reference:	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 5/19/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14696, Sediment Toxicity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	24596
Pollutant:	Invertebrate Toxicity
LOE Subgroup:	Toxicity
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	3
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	TOXICITY TESTING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Hyalella azteca Survival (%) 10 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival.
Guideline Reference:	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 3 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ001 - Pajaro River at Y Road, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 5/3/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14696, Sediment Toxicity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	24586
Pollutant:	Invertebrate Toxicity
LOE Subgroup:	Toxicity
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	TOXICITY TESTING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Hyalella azteca Survival (%) 10 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival.
Guideline Reference:	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14707	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Temperature, water
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Seven lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. A total of 124 of the 1444 samples exceed the Evaluation Guideline (Moyle 1976) applied to protect the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. A total of 124 of the 1444 samples exceed the Evaluation Guideline (Moyle 1976) applied to protect the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14707, Temperature, water Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	12107
Pollutant:	Temperature, water
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	11
Number of Exceedances:	4
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 4 of 11 samples exceed the criterion for Water Temperature.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (General Objective in Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129).
Guideline Reference:	Inland Fishes of California
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 7/6/2001-8/31/2005. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14707, Temperature, water Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	19626
Pollutant:	Temperature, water
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	7
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Monitoring Program (R3_SCCEH) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Water Temperature.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1971-1996
	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1997-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (General Objective in Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129).
Guideline Reference:	Inland Fishes of California
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ_SCC - PAJARO R at CHITTENDEN PASS, 305PMO_SCC - PAJARO R at MOUTH]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 9/7/2000-4/3/2003.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	This monitoring program has been underway for thirty years, with changes over time to protocols, level of QA, and documentation. In general, QA documentation included with the dataset is minimal. However, data quality appears to be reasonably good.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14707, Temperature, water Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	12087
Pollutant:	Temperature, water
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	147
Number of Exceedances:	5
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 5 of 147 samples exceed the criterion for Water Temperature.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (General Objective in Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129).
Guideline Reference:	Inland Fishes of California
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 5 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/18/1997-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14707, Temperature, water Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	12165
Pollutant:	Temperature, water
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	58
Number of Exceedances:	9
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 9 of 58 samples exceed the criterion for Water Temperature.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (General Objective in Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129).
Guideline Reference:	Inland Fishes of California
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/26/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14707, Temperature, water Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	13649
Pollutant:	Temperature, water
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	10
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 10 samples exceed the criterion for Water Temperature.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (General Objective in Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129).
Guideline Reference:	Inland Fishes of California
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14707, Temperature, water Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	18630
Pollutant:	Temperature, water
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Coastal Watershed Council (Snapshot day monitoring) (R3_Snap) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for Water Temperature.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Volunteer Monitoring Network Data. 2003-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (General Objective in Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129).
Guideline Reference:	Inland Fishes of California
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305-PAJAR-21 - Pajaro River under Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 5/17/2003-5/6/2006. Coastal Watershed Council Snapshot Day Monitoring is conducted annually.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	State Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14707, Temperature, water Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17637
Pollutant:	Temperature, water
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1207
Number of Exceedances:	106
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 106 of 1207 samples exceed the criterion for Water Temperature.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (General Objective in Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129).
Guideline Reference:	Inland Fishes of California
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 24 monitoring sites [ PA-BET - Pajaro River at Betabel Road, PA-CHI - Pajaro River at Chittenden, PA-MUR - Pajaro River at Murphy's, PA-19, PA-20, PA-H25 PA-21, PA-22, PA-ONF PA-MNS - Pajaro River at Main, PA-23, PA-24, PA-26, PA-13, PA-27, PA-UVAS PA-14, PA-29, PA-15, PA-30, PA-16, PA-31, PA-18, PA-FLR - Pajaro River at Frazer Lake Rd.]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 10/4/2000-2/11/2007.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14708	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Toxaphene
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 4 samples exceed the Municipal & Domestic Supply water quality objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 4 samples exceed the Municipal & Domestic Supply water quality objective and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are not exceeded.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14708, Toxaphene Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	18773
Pollutant:	Toxaphene
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Department of Health Services (R3_DHS1) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for toxaphene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 1 (feb06)
	Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 2 (sed06)
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All inland surface waters, enclosed bays, and estuaries shall not contain concentrations of organic chemicals in excess of the limiting concentrations set forth in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Chapter 15, Article 5.5, Section 64444.5, Table 5 and listed in Table 3-1 of the Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Municipal and Domestic Supply Objective. Table 3-1 states that Toxaphene shall not exceed 5.0 ug/L (page III-6).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Title 22, Division 4, Ch. 15, Article 4, Section 64431, Table 64431-A
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Basin Plan Municipal and Domestic Supply Objective for Toxaphene is 5.0 ug/L as stated in Table 3-1 (page III-6). All inland surface waters, enclosed bays, and estuaries shall not contain concentrations of organic chemicals in excess of the limiting concentrations set forth in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Chapter 15, Article 5.5, Section 64444.5, Table 5 and listed in Table 3-1.
Guideline Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ DHS006 - Pajaro River @ Railroad Bridge, DHS007 - Pajaro River downstream of the ditch draining]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/13/1994-1/27/1995.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	No QAPP was provided for this data set.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14710	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Zinc
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in adding that pollutant to the Section 303(d) list. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because the sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14710, Zinc Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17755
Pollutant:	Zinc
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Zinc.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for zinc is 459 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14710, Zinc Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17754
Pollutant:	Zinc
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Zinc.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for zinc is 459 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	17039	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Chlordane
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2021
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 2.1 and 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 9 samples exceed the Criteria Continuous Concentration (USEPA. 40 CFR, May 2000). However, 5 of the 9 samples exceed the Human Health Criteria for consumption (USEPA, 40 CFR, May 2000). Based on section 3.1 the site exceeded numeric objectives for toxic pollutants. Using the binomial distribution, waters shall be placed on the section 303(d) list if the number of measured exceedances supports rejection of the null hypothesis as presented in Table 3.1. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Five of the 9 samples exceed the Human Health Criteria for consumption (USEPA, 40 CFR, May 2000) and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
USEPA Action (if applicable):	USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 17039, Chlordane Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	29971
Pollutant:	Chlordane
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Fish Migration | Fish Spawning | Preservation of Rare & Endangered Species | Warm Freshwater Habitat | Wildlife Habitat
Number of Samples:	9
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Nine samples were analyzed by solid phase extraction after an approximately 30 day exposure, in-situ, to known volumes of water. Nine separate sample events were conducted by CCLEAN staff. None of the 9 samples exceed the Criteria Continuous Concentration.
Data Reference:	Final Data CCLEAN Mussel Tissue and Solid Phase Extraction data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentration which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Central Coast Water Quality Control Plan, general Objective, Section II.A.2.a).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	The Criteria Continuous Concentration (CCC) or the the highest concentration of a pollutant to which aquatic life can be exposed for an extended period of time (4 days) without deleterious effects for Chlordane is 0.0043 ug/L (USEPA. Federal Register, 40 CFR Part 131 (Vol.65, No. 97. May 18, 2000.) )
Guideline Reference:	Water Quality Standards; Establishment of Numeric Criteria for Priority Toxic Pollutants for the State of California; Rule. 40 CFR Part 131. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, Water Division, San Francisco, CA
Spatial Representation:	Single sample location, Pajaro River adjacent to railroad bridge on south shore (Lat, N 36.9019, Long, W 121.7550)
Temporal Representation:	Nine separate (approximate 30 day) sample events. The first was initiated on October 3rd, 2002 and the ninth on September 8th 2006.
Environmental Conditions:	Water from the sample source (i.e., river) is pumped sequentially through a 0.45 micron glass-fiber particle filter, then through a column packed with XAD-2 resin beads, to which nonpolar compounds adsorb. Sampling rates are set to optimum volumes to ensure maximum extraction of target compounds from the sample water. Samples are pumped on a flow-proportioned basis to achieve the desired sample volumes over an approximately 30-day period. This requires predictions of total river discharges during the sampling period, which predictions are not always borne out, resulting in either longer sampling periods or higher or lower than the targeted sample volume. Higher sample volumes provide lower analytical detection limits. Both the particle filter and resin beads are extracted in the laboratory and the extracts are combined and analyzed to provide a total concentration of each compound in the extracted volume of water.
QAPP Information:	CCLEAN has an approved QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 17039, Chlordane Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	29993
Pollutant:	Chlordane
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	9
Number of Exceedances:	5
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Nine samples were analyzed by solid phase extraction after an approximately 30 day exposure, in-situ, to known volumes of water. Nine separate sample events were conducted by CCLEAN staff. Five of 9 samples exceed the Human Health Criteria.
Data Reference:	Final Data CCLEAN Mussel Tissue and Solid Phase Extraction data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Human Health Criteria, for the consumption of water, set for Chlordane is 0.00057 ug/L (USEPA. Federal Register, 40 CFR Part 131 (Vol.65, No. 97. May 18, 2000)).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Standards; Establishment of Numeric Criteria for Priority Toxic Pollutants for the State of California; Rule. 40 CFR Part 131. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, Water Division, San Francisco, CA
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Single sample location, Pajaro River adjacent to railroad bridge on south shore (Lat, N 36.9019, Long, W 121.7550)
Temporal Representation:	Nine separate (approximate 30 day) sample events. The first was initiated on October 3rd, 2002 and the ninth on September 8th 2006.
Environmental Conditions:	Water from the sample source (i.e., river) is pumped sequentially through a 0.45 micron glass-fiber particle filter, then through a column packed with XAD-2 resin beads, to which nonpolar compounds adsorb. Sampling rates are set to optimum volumes to ensure maximum extraction of target compounds from the sample water. Samples are pumped on a flow-proportioned basis to achieve the desired sample volumes over an approximately 30-day period. This requires predictions of total river discharges during the sampling period, which predictions are not always borne out, resulting in either longer sampling periods or higher or lower than the targeted sample volume. Higher sample volumes provide lower analytical detection limits. Both the particle filter and resin beads are extracted in the laboratory and the extracts are combined and analyzed to provide a total concentration of each compound in the extracted volume of water.
QAPP Information:	CCLEAN has an approved QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14674	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Chloride
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	Agriculture | Natural Sources | Other Urban Runoff | Saltwater Intrusion
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2021
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 2.1 and 3.2 of the Listing Policy. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on section 3.2 the site exceeded numeric objectives for conventional pollutants. According to the binomial distribution, waters shall be placed on the section 303(d) list if the number of measured exceedances supports rejection of the null hypothesis as presented in Table 3.2. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Thirty-five of 52 samples exceeded the water quality objective for Agricultural Supply. Twenty-five of these samples also exceeds the Waterbody specific objective set for anti-degradation, and not for beneficial use protection. Each of these exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
USEPA Action (if applicable):	USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14674, Chloride Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	9357
Pollutant:	Chloride
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	52
Number of Exceedances:	35
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 35 of 52 samples exceed the criterion for Chloride.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when chloride exceeds 106 mg/L in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/26/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14676	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Chlorpyrifos
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	Agriculture | Other Urban Runoff
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2021
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 2.1 and 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Eight lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on section 3.1 the site exceeded numeric objectives for toxic pollutants. Using the binomial distribution, waters shall be placed on the section 303(d) list if the number of measured exceedances supports rejection of the null hypothesis as presented in Table 3.1. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Five of 17 samples exceeded the Evaluation Guideline for the protection of aquatic live beneficial uses (Sipmann and Finlayson 2000) and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
USEPA Action (if applicable):	USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14676, Chlorpyrifos Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16219
Pollutant:	Chlorpyrifos
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for Chlorpyrifos.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Sediment Chemistry Data from Region 3 Harbors, 2004
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	One hour average maximum concentration 0.025 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000).
Guideline Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 3 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ001 - Pajaro River at Y Road, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 5/3/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14676, Chlorpyrifos Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16329
Pollutant:	Chlorpyrifos
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Chlorpyrifos.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Sediment Chemistry Data from Region 3 Harbors, 2004
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	One hour average maximum concentration 0.025 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000).
Guideline Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14676, Chlorpyrifos Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16328
Pollutant:	Chlorpyrifos
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Chlorpyrifos.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Sediment Chemistry Data from Region 3 Harbors, 2004
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	One hour average maximum concentration 0.025 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000).
Guideline Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14676, Chlorpyrifos Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	18638
Pollutant:	Chlorpyrifos
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Department of Health Services (R3_DHS1) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for chlorpyrifos.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 1 (feb06)
	Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 2 (sed06)
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	One hour average maximum concentration 0.025 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000).
Guideline Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ DHS006 - Pajaro River @ Railroad Bridge, DHS007 - Pajaro River downstream of the ditch draining]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/13/1994-1/27/1995.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	No QAPP was provided for this data set.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14676, Chlorpyrifos Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	18637
Pollutant:	Chlorpyrifos
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Department of Health Services (R3_DHS1) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for chlorpyrifos.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 1 (feb06)
	Final Data File used for assessment: DHS Sediment Chemistry Data, File 2 (sed06)
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	One hour average maximum concentration 0.025 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000).
Guideline Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ DHS006 - Pajaro River @ Railroad Bridge, DHS007 - Pajaro River downstream of the ditch draining]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/13/1994-1/27/1995.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	No QAPP was provided for this data set.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14676, Chlorpyrifos Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16220
Pollutant:	Chlorpyrifos
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for Chlorpyrifos.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Sediment Chemistry Data from Region 3 Harbors, 2004
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	One hour average maximum concentration 0.025 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000).
Guideline Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 3 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ001 - Pajaro River at Y Road, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 5/3/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14676, Chlorpyrifos Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16217
Pollutant:	Chlorpyrifos
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	8
Number of Exceedances:	3
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 8 samples exceed the criterion for Chlorpyrifos.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Sediment Chemistry Data from Region 3 Harbors, 2004
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	One hour average maximum concentration 0.025 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000).
Guideline Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ001 - Pajaro River at Y Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 1/10/2006-5/30/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14676, Chlorpyrifos Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16216
Pollutant:	Chlorpyrifos
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	8
Number of Exceedances:	3
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 8 samples exceed the criterion for Chlorpyrifos.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Sediment Chemistry Data from Region 3 Harbors, 2004
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	One hour average maximum concentration 0.025 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000).
Guideline Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ001 - Pajaro River at Y Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 1/10/2006-5/30/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	17040	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	DDD (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane)
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2013
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 2.1 and 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Four lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Seven of the 9 water samples exceed the Criteria Continuous Concentration for DDT (USEPA. 40 CFR, May 2000). In addition, 8 of the 9 samples for DDT, DDE and DDD exceed the Human Health Criteria for consumption (USEPA, 40 CFR, May 2000). Based on section 3.1 the site exceeded numeric objectives for toxic pollutants. Using the binomial distribution, waters shall be placed on the section 303(d) list if the number of measured exceedances supports rejection of the null hypothesis as presented in Table 3.1. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Seven of the 9 water samples exceed the Criteria Continuous Concentration for DDT (USEPA. 40 CFR, May 2000). In addition, 8 of the 9 samples for DDT, DDE and DDD exceed the Human Health Criteria for consumption (USEPA, 40 CFR, May 2000). Each of these exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
USEPA Action (if applicable):	USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 17040, DDD (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	29980
Pollutant:	DDD (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	9
Number of Exceedances:	8
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Nine samples were analyzed by solid phase extraction after an approximately 30 day exposure, in-situ, to known volumes of water. Nine separate sample events were conducted by CCLEAN staff. Eight of the 9 samples exceed the Human Health Criteria.
Data Reference:	Final Data CCLEAN Mussel Tissue and Solid Phase Extraction data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Human Health Criteria, for the consumption of water, set for 4,4'-DDD is 0.00083 ug/L (USEPA. Federal Register, 40 CFR Part 131 (Vol.65, No. 97. May 18, 2000)).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Standards; Establishment of Numeric Criteria for Priority Toxic Pollutants for the State of California; Rule. 40 CFR Part 131. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, Water Division, San Francisco, CA
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Single sample location, Pajaro River adjacent to railroad bridge on south shore (Lat, N 36.9019, Long, W 121.7550)
Temporal Representation:	Nine separate (approximate 30 day) sample events. The first was initiated on October 3rd, 2002 and the ninth on September 8th 2006.
Environmental Conditions:	Water from the sample source (i.e., river) is pumped sequentially through a 0.45 micron glass-fiber particle filter, then through a column packed with XAD-2 resin beads, to which nonpolar compounds adsorb. Sampling rates are set to optimum volumes to ensure maximum extraction of target compounds from the sample water. Samples are pumped on a flow-proportioned basis to achieve the desired sample volumes over an approximately 30-day period. This requires predictions of total river discharges during the sampling period, which predictions are not always borne out, resulting in either longer sampling periods or higher or lower than the targeted sample volume. Higher sample volumes provide lower analytical detection limits. Both the particle filter and resin beads are extracted in the laboratory and the extracts are combined and analyzed to provide a total concentration of each compound in the extracted volume of water.
QAPP Information:	CCLEAN has an approved QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 17040, DDD (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	29982
Pollutant:	DDE (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	9
Number of Exceedances:	8
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Nine samples were analyzed by solid phase extraction after an approximately 30 day exposure, in-situ, to known volumes of water. Nine separate sample events were conducted by CCLEAN staff. Eight of the 9 samples exceed the Human Health Criteria.
Data Reference:	Final Data CCLEAN Mussel Tissue and Solid Phase Extraction data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Human Health Criteria, for the consumption of water, set for 4,4'-DDE is 0.00059 ug/L (USEPA. Federal Register, 40 CFR Part 131 (Vol.65, No. 97. May 18, 2000)).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Standards; Establishment of Numeric Criteria for Priority Toxic Pollutants for the State of California; Rule. 40 CFR Part 131. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, Water Division, San Francisco, CA
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Single sample location, Pajaro River adjacent to railroad bridge on south shore (Lat, N 36.9019, Long, W 121.7550)
Temporal Representation:	Nine separate (approximate 30 day) sample events. The first was initiated on October 3rd, 2002 and the ninth on September 8th 2006.
Environmental Conditions:	Water from the sample source (i.e., river) is pumped sequentially through a 0.45 micron glass-fiber particle filter, then through a column packed with XAD-2 resin beads, to which nonpolar compounds adsorb. Sampling rates are set to optimum volumes to ensure maximum extraction of target compounds from the sample water. Samples are pumped on a flow-proportioned basis to achieve the desired sample volumes over an approximately 30-day period. This requires predictions of total river discharges during the sampling period, which predictions are not always borne out, resulting in either longer sampling periods or higher or lower than the targeted sample volume. Higher sample volumes provide lower analytical detection limits. Both the particle filter and resin beads are extracted in the laboratory and the extracts are combined and analyzed to provide a total concentration of each compound in the extracted volume of water.
QAPP Information:	CCLEAN has an approved QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 17040, DDD (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	29990
Pollutant:	DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	9
Number of Exceedances:	8
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Nine samples were analyzed by solid phase extraction after an approximately 30 day exposure, in-situ, to known volumes of water. Nine separate sample events were conducted by CCLEAN staff. Eight of the 9 samples exceed the Human Health Criteria.
Data Reference:	Final Data CCLEAN Mussel Tissue and Solid Phase Extraction data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Human Health Criteria, for the consumption of water, set for 4,4'-DDT is 0.00059 ug/L (USEPA. Federal Register, 40 CFR Part 131 (Vol.65, No. 97. May 18, 2000)).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Standards; Establishment of Numeric Criteria for Priority Toxic Pollutants for the State of California; Rule. 40 CFR Part 131. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, Water Division, San Francisco, CA
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Single sample location, Pajaro River adjacent to railroad bridge on south shore (Lat, N 36.9019, Long, W 121.7550)
Temporal Representation:	Nine separate (approximate 30 day) sample events. The first was initiated on October 3rd, 2002 and the ninth on September 8th 2006.
Environmental Conditions:	Water from the sample source (i.e., river) is pumped sequentially through a 0.45 micron glass-fiber particle filter, then through a column packed with XAD-2 resin beads, to which nonpolar compounds adsorb. Sampling rates are set to optimum volumes to ensure maximum extraction of target compounds from the sample water. Samples are pumped on a flow-proportioned basis to achieve the desired sample volumes over an approximately 30-day period. This requires predictions of total river discharges during the sampling period, which predictions are not always borne out, resulting in either longer sampling periods or higher or lower than the targeted sample volume. Higher sample volumes provide lower analytical detection limits. Both the particle filter and resin beads are extracted in the laboratory and the extracts are combined and analyzed to provide a total concentration of each compound in the extracted volume of water.
QAPP Information:	CCLEAN has an approved QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 17040, DDD (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	29973
Pollutant:	DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Fish Migration | Fish Spawning | Preservation of Rare & Endangered Species | Warm Freshwater Habitat | Wildlife Habitat
Number of Samples:	9
Number of Exceedances:	7
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Nine samples were analyzed by solid phase extraction after an approximately 30 day exposure, in-situ, to known volumes of water. Nine separate sample events were conducted by CCLEAN staff. Seven of the 9 samples exceed the Criteria Continuous Concentration.
Data Reference:	Final Data CCLEAN Mussel Tissue and Solid Phase Extraction data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentration which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Central Coast Water Quality Control Plan, general Objective, Section II.A.2.a).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	The Criteria Continuous Concentration (CCC) or the the highest concentration of a pollutant to which aquatic life can be exposed for an extended period of time (4 days) without deleterious effects for 4,4'-DDT is 0.001 ug/L (USEPA. Federal Register, 40 CFR Part 131 (Vol.65, No. 97. May 18, 2000.) )
Guideline Reference:	Water Quality Standards; Establishment of Numeric Criteria for Priority Toxic Pollutants for the State of California; Rule. 40 CFR Part 131. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, Water Division, San Francisco, CA
Spatial Representation:	Single sample location, Pajaro River adjacent to railroad bridge on south shore (Lat, N 36.9019, Long, W 121.7550)
Temporal Representation:	Nine separate (approximate 30 day) sample events. The first was initiated on October 3rd, 2002 and the ninth on September 8th 2006.
Environmental Conditions:	Water from the sample source (i.e., river) is pumped sequentially through a 0.45 micron glass-fiber particle filter, then through a column packed with XAD-2 resin beads, to which nonpolar compounds adsorb. Sampling rates are set to optimum volumes to ensure maximum extraction of target compounds from the sample water. Samples are pumped on a flow-proportioned basis to achieve the desired sample volumes over an approximately 30-day period. This requires predictions of total river discharges during the sampling period, which predictions are not always borne out, resulting in either longer sampling periods or higher or lower than the targeted sample volume. Higher sample volumes provide lower analytical detection limits. Both the particle filter and resin beads are extracted in the laboratory and the extracts are combined and analyzed to provide a total concentration of each compound in the extracted volume of water.
QAPP Information:	CCLEAN has an approved QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14684	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Dieldrin
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2021
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 2.1 and 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Four lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sediment sample did not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. In addition, none of the 9 water samples exceed the Criteria Continuous Concentration (USEPA. 40 CFR, May 2000). However, all 9 samples exceed the Human Health Criteria for consumption (USEPA, 40 CFR, May 2000). Based on section 3.1 the site exceeded numeric objectives for toxic pollutants. Using the binomial distribution, waters shall be placed on the section 303(d) list if the number of measured exceedances supports rejection of the null hypothesis as presented in Table 3.1. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. All 9 samples exceed the Human Health Criteria for consumption (USEPA, 40 CFR, May 2000) and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
USEPA Action (if applicable):	USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14684, Dieldrin Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16776
Pollutant:	Dieldrin
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Dieldrin.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for dieldrin is 61.8 ug/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14684, Dieldrin Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	29972
Pollutant:	Dieldrin
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Fish Migration | Fish Spawning | Preservation of Rare & Endangered Species | Warm Freshwater Habitat | Wildlife Habitat
Number of Samples:	9
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Nine samples were analyzed by solid phase extraction after an approximately 30 day exposure, in-situ, to known volumes of water. Nine separate sample events were conducted by CCLEAN staff. None of the 9 samples exceed the Criteria Continuous Concentration.
Data Reference:	Final Data CCLEAN Mussel Tissue and Solid Phase Extraction data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentration which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Central Coast Water Quality Control Plan, general Objective, Section II.A.2.a).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	The Criteria Continuous Concentration (CCC) or the the highest concentration of a pollutant to which aquatic life can be exposed for an extended period of time (4 days) without deleterious effects for Dieldrin is 0.056 ug/L (USEPA. Federal Register, 40 CFR Part 131 (Vol.65, No. 97. May 18, 2000.) )
Guideline Reference:	Water Quality Standards; Establishment of Numeric Criteria for Priority Toxic Pollutants for the State of California; Rule. 40 CFR Part 131. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, Water Division, San Francisco, CA
Spatial Representation:	Single sample location, Pajaro River adjacent to railroad bridge on south shore (Lat, N 36.9019, Long, W 121.7550)
Temporal Representation:	Nine separate (approximate 30 day) sample events. The first was initiated on October 3rd, 2002 and the ninth on September 8th 2006.
Environmental Conditions:	Water from the sample source (i.e., river) is pumped sequentially through a 0.45 micron glass-fiber particle filter, then through a column packed with XAD-2 resin beads, to which nonpolar compounds adsorb. Sampling rates are set to optimum volumes to ensure maximum extraction of target compounds from the sample water. Samples are pumped on a flow-proportioned basis to achieve the desired sample volumes over an approximately 30-day period. This requires predictions of total river discharges during the sampling period, which predictions are not always borne out, resulting in either longer sampling periods or higher or lower than the targeted sample volume. Higher sample volumes provide lower analytical detection limits. Both the particle filter and resin beads are extracted in the laboratory and the extracts are combined and analyzed to provide a total concentration of each compound in the extracted volume of water.
QAPP Information:	CCLEAN has an approved QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14684, Dieldrin Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	29991
Pollutant:	Dieldrin
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	9
Number of Exceedances:	9
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Nine samples were analyzed by solid phase extraction after an approximately 30 day exposure, in-situ, to known volumes of water. Nine separate sample events were conducted by CCLEAN staff. All 9 samples exceed the Human Health Criteria.
Data Reference:	Final Data CCLEAN Mussel Tissue and Solid Phase Extraction data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Human Health Criteria, for the consumption of water, set for Dieldrin is 0.00014 ug/L (USEPA. Federal Register, 40 CFR Part 131 (Vol.65, No. 97. May 18, 2000)).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Standards; Establishment of Numeric Criteria for Priority Toxic Pollutants for the State of California; Rule. 40 CFR Part 131. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, Water Division, San Francisco, CA
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Single sample location, Pajaro River adjacent to railroad bridge on south shore (Lat, N 36.9019, Long, W 121.7550)
Temporal Representation:	Nine separate (approximate 30 day) sample events. The first was initiated on October 3rd, 2002 and the ninth on September 8th 2006.
Environmental Conditions:	Water from the sample source (i.e., river) is pumped sequentially through a 0.45 micron glass-fiber particle filter, then through a column packed with XAD-2 resin beads, to which nonpolar compounds adsorb. Sampling rates are set to optimum volumes to ensure maximum extraction of target compounds from the sample water. Samples are pumped on a flow-proportioned basis to achieve the desired sample volumes over an approximately 30-day period. This requires predictions of total river discharges during the sampling period, which predictions are not always borne out, resulting in either longer sampling periods or higher or lower than the targeted sample volume. Higher sample volumes provide lower analytical detection limits. Both the particle filter and resin beads are extracted in the laboratory and the extracts are combined and analyzed to provide a total concentration of each compound in the extracted volume of water.
QAPP Information:	CCLEAN has an approved QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14684, Dieldrin Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	16777
Pollutant:	Dieldrin
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (03SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Dieldrin.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for dieldrin is 61.8 ug/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/29/2004. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14691	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Escherichia coli (E. coli)
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	Collection System Failure | Natural Sources | Onsite Wastewater Systems (Septic Tanks) | Pasture Grazing-Riparian and/or Upland | Transient encampments | Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2011
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 2.1 and 3.3 of the Listing Policy. Ten lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on section 3.3 the site exceeded numeric objectives for conventional pollutants. According to the binomial distribution, waters shall be placed on the section 303(d) list if the number of measured exceedances supports rejection of the null hypothesis as presented in Table 3.2. The Pajaro River Fecal Coliform TMDL (including Pajaro River, San Benito River, Llagas Creek and Tequisquita Slough) was approved by the Central Coast Regional Board on March 20, 2009 and is currently awaiting to be heard by the State Board. Because E. coli is a fecal coliform staff assume that E. coli will be also be addresses under this TMDL. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Twenty-seven of 132 samples exceeded the Evaluation Guideline (USEPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria, 1986) as it applies to the Water Contact Recreation beneficial use and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
USEPA Action (if applicable):	USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14691, Escherichia coli (E. coli) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	19880
Pollutant:	Escherichia coli (E. coli)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Non-Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	5
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Monitoring Program (R3_SCCEH) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceed the criterion for Escherichia coli.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1971-1996
	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1997-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: Fecal coliform concentration, based on a minimum of not less than five samples for any 30-day period, shall not exceed a log mean of 2000/100 ml, nor shall more than ten percent of samples collected during any 30-day period exceed 4000/100 ml. E. coli is a fecal coliform.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ_SCC - PAJARO R at CHITTENDEN PASS, 305PMO_SCC - PAJARO R at MOUTH]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/11/2001-3/15/2004.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	This monitoring program has been underway for thirty years, with changes over time to protocols, level of QA, and documentation. In general, QA documentation included with the dataset is minimal. However, data quality appears to be reasonably good.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14691, Escherichia coli (E. coli) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	10408
Pollutant:	Escherichia coli (E. coli)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Water Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	60
Number of Exceedances:	14
Data and Information Type:	PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 14 of 60 samples exceed the criterion for Escherichia coli.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	USEPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria -1986.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria - 1986. EPA440/5-84-002
Evaluation Guideline:	Single sample maximum allowable density for E. coli in freshwater is 235 MPN/100mL (as stated in Table 4, page 15)
Guideline Reference:	Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria - 1986. EPA440/5-84-002
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 1/24/2005-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14691, Escherichia coli (E. coli) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	10118
Pollutant:	Escherichia coli (E. coli)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Non-Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	60
Number of Exceedances:	4
Data and Information Type:	PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 4 of 60 samples exceed the criterion for Escherichia coli.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: Fecal coliform concentration, based on a minimum of not less than five samples for any 30-day period, shall not exceed a log mean of 2000/100 ml, nor shall more than ten percent of samples collected during any 30-day period exceed 4000/100 ml. E. coli is a fecal coliform.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 1/24/2005-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14691, Escherichia coli (E. coli) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	10993
Pollutant:	Escherichia coli (E. coli)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Non-Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	25
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 25 samples exceed the criterion for Escherichia coli.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: Fecal coliform concentration, based on a minimum of not less than five samples for any 30-day period, shall not exceed a log mean of 2000/100 ml, nor shall more than ten percent of samples collected during any 30-day period exceed 4000/100 ml. E. coli is a fecal coliform.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 1/24/2005-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14691, Escherichia coli (E. coli) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	10992
Pollutant:	Escherichia coli (E. coli)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Water Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	25
Number of Exceedances:	6
Data and Information Type:	PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 6 of 25 samples exceed the criterion for Escherichia coli.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	USEPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria -1986.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria - 1986. EPA440/5-84-002
Evaluation Guideline:	Single sample maximum allowable density for E. coli in freshwater is 235 MPN/100mL (as stated in Table 4, page 15)
Guideline Reference:	Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria - 1986. EPA440/5-84-002
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 1/24/2005-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14691, Escherichia coli (E. coli) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	18310
Pollutant:	Escherichia coli (E. coli)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Water Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	3
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Coastal Watershed Council (Snapshot day monitoring) (R3_Snap) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceed the criterion for Escherichia coli.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Volunteer Monitoring Network Data. 2003-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	USEPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria -1986.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria - 1986. EPA440/5-84-002
Evaluation Guideline:	Single sample maximum allowable density for E. coli in freshwater is 235 MPN/100mL (as stated in Table 4, page 15)
Guideline Reference:	Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria - 1986. EPA440/5-84-002
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305-PAJAR-21 - Pajaro River under Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 5/17/2003-5/7/2005. Coastal Watershed Council Snapshot Day Monitoring is conducted annually.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	State Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14691, Escherichia coli (E. coli) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	18311
Pollutant:	Escherichia coli (E. coli)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Non-Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	3
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Coastal Watershed Council (Snapshot day monitoring) (R3_Snap) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceed the criterion for Escherichia coli.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Volunteer Monitoring Network Data. 2003-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: Fecal coliform concentration, based on a minimum of not less than five samples for any 30-day period, shall not exceed a log mean of 2000/100 ml, nor shall more than ten percent of samples collected during any 30-day period exceed 4000/100 ml. E. coli is a fecal coliform.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305-PAJAR-21 - Pajaro River under Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 5/17/2003-5/7/2005. Coastal Watershed Council Snapshot Day Monitoring is conducted annually.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	State Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14691, Escherichia coli (E. coli) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	14012
Pollutant:	Escherichia coli (E. coli)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Water Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	39
Number of Exceedances:	7
Data and Information Type:	PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Central Coast Long Term Environmental Assessment Program (R3_CCLEAN) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 7 of 39 samples exceed the criterion for Escherichia coli.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCLEAN (Central Coast Long Term Environmental Assessment Program data) Water Quality Data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	USEPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria -1986.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria - 1986. EPA440/5-84-002
Evaluation Guideline:	Single sample maximum allowable density for E. coli in freshwater is 235 MPN/100mL (as stated in Table 4, page 15)
Guideline Reference:	Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria - 1986. EPA440/5-84-002
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PAJ_CCL - Pajaro River at Thurwachter]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 1/25/2002-6/20/2005.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	EPA Approved QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14691, Escherichia coli (E. coli) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	14013
Pollutant:	Escherichia coli (E. coli)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Non-Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	39
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Central Coast Long Term Environmental Assessment Program (R3_CCLEAN) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 39 samples exceed the criterion for Escherichia coli.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCLEAN (Central Coast Long Term Environmental Assessment Program data) Water Quality Data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: Fecal coliform concentration, based on a minimum of not less than five samples for any 30-day period, shall not exceed a log mean of 2000/100 ml, nor shall more than ten percent of samples collected during any 30-day period exceed 4000/100 ml. E. coli is a fecal coliform.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305PAJ_CCL - Pajaro River at Thurwachter]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 1/25/2002-6/20/2005.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	EPA Approved QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14691, Escherichia coli (E. coli) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	19865
Pollutant:	Escherichia coli (E. coli)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Water Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	5
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Monitoring Program (R3_SCCEH) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceed the criterion for Escherichia coli.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1971-1996
	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1997-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	USEPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria -1986.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria - 1986. EPA440/5-84-002
Evaluation Guideline:	Single sample maximum allowable density for E. coli in freshwater is 235 MPN/100mL (as stated in Table 4, page 15)
Guideline Reference:	Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria - 1986. EPA440/5-84-002
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ_SCC - PAJARO R at CHITTENDEN PASS, 305PMO_SCC - PAJARO R at MOUTH]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/11/2001-3/15/2004.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	This monitoring program has been underway for thirty years, with changes over time to protocols, level of QA, and documentation. In general, QA documentation included with the dataset is minimal. However, data quality appears to be reasonably good.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14685	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Low Dissolved Oxygen
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	Agriculture | Grazing-Related Sources | Other Urban Runoff | Removal of Riparian Vegetation | Unknown Nonpoint Source
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2021
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 2.1 and 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Twenty-two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess these pollutants. Two water quality objectives are assessed: 307 of the 1423 samples exceed the dissolved oxygen water quality objective for Cold Freshwater Habitat but, only 50 of the 1423 samples also exceeded the water quality objective for Cold Freshwater Habitat. In addition, 76 of 233 samples exceed the general water quality objective for oxygen saturation (when applied as a single sample maximum). However, the Basin Plan objective states that the median oxygen saturation value shall not fall below 85% and the median value did not exceed this criterion. Therefore, the use rating for oxygen saturation is set at insufficient information. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. A total of 307 of the 1423 samples exceed the dissolved oxygen water quality objective for Cold Freshwater Habitat and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
USEPA Action (if applicable):	USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14685, Low Dissolved Oxygen Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	12103
Pollutant:	Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	11
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 11 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Cold Water Habitat Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 7.0 mg/l at any time.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 7/6/2001-8/31/2005. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14685, Low Dissolved Oxygen Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17782
Pollutant:	Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1174
Number of Exceedances:	268
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 268 of 1174 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Cold Water Habitat Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 7.0 mg/l at any time.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 24 monitoring sites [ PA-BET - Pajaro River at Betabel Road, PA-CHI - Pajaro River at Chittenden, PA-MUR - Pajaro River at Murphy's, PA-19, PA-20, PA-H25 PA-21, PA-22, PA-ONF PA-23, PA-MNS - Pajaro River at Main, PA-24, PA-26, PA-13, PA-27, PA-UVAS PA-14, PA-29, PA-15, PA-30, PA-16, PA-31, PA-18, PA-FLR - Pajaro River at Frazer Lake Rd.]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 10/4/2000-2/11/2007.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14685, Low Dissolved Oxygen Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	19766
Pollutant:	Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	7
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Monitoring Program (R3_SCCEH) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1971-1996
	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1997-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Cold Water Habitat Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 7.0 mg/l at any time.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ_SCC - PAJARO R at CHITTENDEN PASS, 305PMO_SCC - PAJARO R at MOUTH]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 9/7/2000-4/3/2003.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	This monitoring program has been underway for thirty years, with changes over time to protocols, level of QA, and documentation. In general, QA documentation included with the dataset is minimal. However, data quality appears to be reasonably good.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14685, Low Dissolved Oxygen Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	18232
Pollutant:	Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Coastal Watershed Council (Snapshot day monitoring) (R3_Snap) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Volunteer Monitoring Network Data. 2003-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 5.0 mg/l at any time.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305-PAJAR-21 - Pajaro River under Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 5/17/2003-5/6/2006. Coastal Watershed Council Snapshot Day Monitoring is conducted annually.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	State Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14685, Low Dissolved Oxygen Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	18231
Pollutant:	Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Coastal Watershed Council (Snapshot day monitoring) (R3_Snap) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Volunteer Monitoring Network Data. 2003-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Cold Water Habitat Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 7.0 mg/l at any time.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305-PAJAR-21 - Pajaro River under Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 5/17/2003-5/6/2006. Coastal Watershed Council Snapshot Day Monitoring is conducted annually.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	State Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14685, Low Dissolved Oxygen Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	13876
Pollutant:	Dissolved oxygen saturation
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	10
Number of Exceedances:	10
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 10 of 10 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Saturation.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: Median values should not fall below 85% saturation as a result of controllable water quality conditions.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14685, Low Dissolved Oxygen Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	13875
Pollutant:	Dissolved oxygen saturation
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	10
Number of Exceedances:	10
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 10 of 10 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Saturation.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: Median values should not fall below 85% saturation as a result of controllable water quality conditions.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14685, Low Dissolved Oxygen Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	12146
Pollutant:	Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	58
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 58 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 5.0 mg/l at any time.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/26/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14685, Low Dissolved Oxygen Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	12145
Pollutant:	Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	58
Number of Exceedances:	11
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 11 of 58 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Cold Water Habitat Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 7.0 mg/l at any time.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/26/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14685, Low Dissolved Oxygen Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	19767
Pollutant:	Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	7
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Monitoring Program (R3_SCCEH) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1971-1996
	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1997-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 5.0 mg/l at any time.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ_SCC - PAJARO R at CHITTENDEN PASS, 305PMO_SCC - PAJARO R at MOUTH]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 9/7/2000-4/3/2003.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	This monitoring program has been underway for thirty years, with changes over time to protocols, level of QA, and documentation. In general, QA documentation included with the dataset is minimal. However, data quality appears to be reasonably good.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14685, Low Dissolved Oxygen Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17783
Pollutant:	Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1174
Number of Exceedances:	46
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 46 of 1174 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 5.0 mg/l at any time.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 24 monitoring sites [ PA-BET - Pajaro River at Betabel Road, PA-CHI - Pajaro River at Chittenden, PA-MUR - Pajaro River at Murphy's, PA-19, PA-20, PA-H25 PA-21, PA-22, PA-ONF PA-23, PA-MNS - Pajaro River at Main, PA-24, PA-26, PA-13, PA-27, PA-UVAS PA-14, PA-29, PA-15, PA-30, PA-16, PA-31, PA-18, PA-FLR - Pajaro River at Frazer Lake Rd.]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 10/4/2000-2/11/2007.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14685, Low Dissolved Oxygen Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	12104
Pollutant:	Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	11
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 11 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 5.0 mg/l at any time.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 7/6/2001-8/31/2005. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14685, Low Dissolved Oxygen Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	12105
Pollutant:	Dissolved oxygen saturation
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	11
Number of Exceedances:	3
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 11 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Saturation.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: Median values should not fall below 85% saturation as a result of controllable water quality conditions.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 7/6/2001-8/31/2005. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14685, Low Dissolved Oxygen Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	12106
Pollutant:	Dissolved oxygen saturation
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	11
Number of Exceedances:	3
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 11 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Saturation.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: Median values should not fall below 85% saturation as a result of controllable water quality conditions.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 7/6/2001-8/31/2005. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14685, Low Dissolved Oxygen Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	12066
Pollutant:	Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	159
Number of Exceedances:	17
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 17 of 159 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Cold Water Habitat Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 7.0 mg/l at any time.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 5 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/18/1997-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14685, Low Dissolved Oxygen Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	12067
Pollutant:	Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	159
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 159 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 5.0 mg/l at any time.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 5 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/18/1997-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14685, Low Dissolved Oxygen Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	12068
Pollutant:	Dissolved oxygen saturation
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	154
Number of Exceedances:	40
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 40 of 154 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Saturation.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: Median values should not fall below 85% saturation as a result of controllable water quality conditions.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 5 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/18/1997-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14685, Low Dissolved Oxygen Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	12069
Pollutant:	Dissolved oxygen saturation
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	154
Number of Exceedances:	40
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 40 of 154 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Saturation.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: Median values should not fall below 85% saturation as a result of controllable water quality conditions.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 5 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/18/1997-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14685, Low Dissolved Oxygen Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	13858
Pollutant:	Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	10
Number of Exceedances:	8
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 8 of 10 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Cold Water Habitat Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 7.0 mg/l at any time.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14685, Low Dissolved Oxygen Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	13859
Pollutant:	Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	10
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 10 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 5.0 mg/l at any time.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14685, Low Dissolved Oxygen Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	12147
Pollutant:	Dissolved oxygen saturation
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	58
Number of Exceedances:	23
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 23 of 58 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Saturation.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: Median values should not fall below 85% saturation as a result of controllable water quality conditions.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/26/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14685, Low Dissolved Oxygen Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	12148
Pollutant:	Dissolved oxygen saturation
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	58
Number of Exceedances:	23
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 23 of 58 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Saturation.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: Median values should not fall below 85% saturation as a result of controllable water quality conditions.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/26/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	17038	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2021
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 2.1 and 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 9 samples exceed the Criteria Continuous Concentration (USEPA. 40 CFR, May 2000). However, 3 of the 9 samples exceed the Human Health Criteria for consumption (USEPA, 40 CFR, May 2000). Based on section 3.1 the site exceeded numeric objectives for toxic pollutants. Using the binomial distribution, waters shall be placed on the section 303(d) list if the number of measured exceedances supports rejection of the null hypothesis as presented in Table 3.1. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Three of the 9 samples exceed the Human Health Criteria for consumption (USEPA, 40 CFR, May 2000) and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
USEPA Action (if applicable):	USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 17038, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	29974
Pollutant:	PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Fish Migration | Fish Spawning | Preservation of Rare & Endangered Species | Warm Freshwater Habitat | Wildlife Habitat
Number of Samples:	9
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Nine samples were analyzed by solid phase extraction after an approximately 30 day exposure, in-situ, to known volumes of water. Nine separate sample events were conducted by CCLEAN staff. None of the 9 samples exceed the Criteria Continuous Concentration.
Data Reference:	Final Data CCLEAN Mussel Tissue and Solid Phase Extraction data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentration which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Central Coast Water Quality Control Plan, general Objective, Section II.A.2.a).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	The Criteria Continuous Concentration (CCC) or the the highest concentration of a pollutant to which aquatic life can be exposed for an extended period of time (4 days) without deleterious effects for PCB's is 0.014 ug/L (USEPA. Federal Register, 40 CFR Part 131 (Vol.65, No. 97. May 18, 2000.) )
Guideline Reference:	Water Quality Standards; Establishment of Numeric Criteria for Priority Toxic Pollutants for the State of California; Rule. 40 CFR Part 131. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, Water Division, San Francisco, CA
Spatial Representation:	Single sample location, Pajaro River adjacent to railroad bridge on south shore (Lat, N 36.9019, Long, W 121.7550)
Temporal Representation:	Nine separate (approximate 30 day) sample events. The first was initiated on October 3rd, 2002 and the ninth on September 8th 2006.
Environmental Conditions:	Water from the sample source (i.e., river) is pumped sequentially through a 0.45 micron glass-fiber particle filter, then through a column packed with XAD-2 resin beads, to which nonpolar compounds adsorb. Sampling rates are set to optimum volumes to ensure maximum extraction of target compounds from the sample water. Samples are pumped on a flow-proportioned basis to achieve the desired sample volumes over an approximately 30-day period. This requires predictions of total river discharges during the sampling period, which predictions are not always borne out, resulting in either longer sampling periods or higher or lower than the targeted sample volume. Higher sample volumes provide lower analytical detection limits. Both the particle filter and resin beads are extracted in the laboratory and the extracts are combined and analyzed to provide a total concentration of each compound in the extracted volume of water.
QAPP Information:	CCLEAN has an approved QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 17038, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	29977
Pollutant:	PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	9
Number of Exceedances:	3
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Nine samples were analyzed by solid phase extraction after an approximately 30 day exposure, in-situ, to known volumes of water. Nine separate sample events were conducted by CCLEAN staff. Three of the 9 samples exceed the Human Health Criteria.
Data Reference:	Final Data CCLEAN Mussel Tissue and Solid Phase Extraction data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Human Health Criteria, for the consumption of water, set for PCB's is 0.00017 ug/L (USEPA. Federal Register, 40 CFR Part 131 (Vol.65, No. 97. May 18, 2000)).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Standards; Establishment of Numeric Criteria for Priority Toxic Pollutants for the State of California; Rule. 40 CFR Part 131. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, Water Division, San Francisco, CA
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Single sample location, Pajaro River adjacent to railroad bridge on south shore (Lat, N 36.9019, Long, W 121.7550)
Temporal Representation:	Nine separate (approximate 30 day) sample events. The first was initiated on October 3rd, 2002 and the ninth on September 8th 2006.
Environmental Conditions:	Water from the sample source (i.e., river) is pumped sequentially through a 0.45 micron glass-fiber particle filter, then through a column packed with XAD-2 resin beads, to which nonpolar compounds adsorb. Sampling rates are set to optimum volumes to ensure maximum extraction of target compounds from the sample water. Samples are pumped on a flow-proportioned basis to achieve the desired sample volumes over an approximately 30-day period. This requires predictions of total river discharges during the sampling period, which predictions are not always borne out, resulting in either longer sampling periods or higher or lower than the targeted sample volume. Higher sample volumes provide lower analytical detection limits. Both the particle filter and resin beads are extracted in the laboratory and the extracts are combined and analyzed to provide a total concentration of each compound in the extracted volume of water.
QAPP Information:	CCLEAN has an approved QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14706	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Sodium
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	Agriculture | Natural Sources | Other Urban Runoff | Saltwater Intrusion | Unknown Nonpoint Source
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2021
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 2.1 and 3.2 of the Listing Policy. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on section 3.2 the site exceeded numeric objectives for conventional pollutants. According to the binomial distribution, waters shall be placed on the section 303(d) list if the number of measured exceedances supports rejection of the null hypothesis as presented in Table 3.2. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Forty-two of 52 samples exceeded the water quality objective for Agricultural Supply and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
USEPA Action (if applicable):	USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14706, Sodium Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	9358
Pollutant:	Sodium
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	52
Number of Exceedances:	42
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 42 of 52 samples exceed the criterion for Sodium.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when sodium exceeds 69 mg/L in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/26/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14709	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Turbidity
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	Agriculture | Grazing-Related Sources | Other Urban Runoff | Removal of Riparian Vegetation
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2021
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 2.1 and 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Twelve lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on section 3.2 the site exceeded numeric objectives for conventional pollutants. According to the binomial distribution, waters shall be placed on the section 303(d) list if the number of measured exceedances supports rejection of the null hypothesis as presented in Table 3.2. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. In addition, A recent publication (Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Resources South of the Golden Gate, California (Becker, G.S and I.J Reining, October 2008) identifies Pajaro River as having "Definite run or population". Therefore this Turbidity Evaluation Guideline is relevant to the waterbody. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Three hundred and twenty of 422 samples exceeded the Evaluation Guideline (Sigler et al., 1984) applied to protect for aquatic life beneficial uses and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
USEPA Action (if applicable):	USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14709, Turbidity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	19356
Pollutant:	Turbidity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	7
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Monitoring Program (R3_SCCEH) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1971-1996
	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1997-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTU's or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food.
Guideline Reference:	Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ_SCC - PAJARO R at CHITTENDEN PASS, 305PMO_SCC - PAJARO R at MOUTH]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 9/7/2000-4/3/2003.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	This monitoring program has been underway for thirty years, with changes over time to protocols, level of QA, and documentation. In general, QA documentation included with the dataset is minimal. However, data quality appears to be reasonably good.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14709, Turbidity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	13648
Pollutant:	Turbidity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	10
Number of Exceedances:	4
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 4 of 10 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTU's or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food.
Guideline Reference:	Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14709, Turbidity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	13647
Pollutant:	Turbidity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	10
Number of Exceedances:	4
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 4 of 10 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTU's or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food.
Guideline Reference:	Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14709, Turbidity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17525
Pollutant:	Turbidity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	242
Number of Exceedances:	214
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 214 of 242 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTU's or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food.
Guideline Reference:	Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 21 monitoring sites [ PA-19, PA-CHI - Pajaro River at Chittenden, PA-20, PA-BET - Pajaro River at Betabel Road, PA-21, PA-22, PA-MNS - Pajaro River at Main, PA-23, PA-24, PA-H25 PA-26, PA-MUR - Pajaro River at Murphy's, PA-13, PA-27, PA-14, PA-29, PA-15, PA-30, PA-16, PA-31, PA-18]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 9/21/2005-2/11/2007.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14709, Turbidity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17524
Pollutant:	Turbidity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	242
Number of Exceedances:	214
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 214 of 242 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTU's or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food.
Guideline Reference:	Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 21 monitoring sites [ PA-19, PA-CHI - Pajaro River at Chittenden, PA-20, PA-BET - Pajaro River at Betabel Road, PA-21, PA-22, PA-MNS - Pajaro River at Main, PA-23, PA-24, PA-H25 PA-26, PA-MUR - Pajaro River at Murphy's, PA-13, PA-27, PA-14, PA-29, PA-15, PA-30, PA-16, PA-31, PA-18]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 9/21/2005-2/11/2007.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14709, Turbidity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	11946
Pollutant:	Turbidity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	3
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTU's or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food.
Guideline Reference:	Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 7/6/2001-8/29/2001. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14709, Turbidity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	12086
Pollutant:	Turbidity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	109
Number of Exceedances:	89
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 89 of 109 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTU's or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food.
Guideline Reference:	Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 5 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/18/1997-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14709, Turbidity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	12085
Pollutant:	Turbidity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	109
Number of Exceedances:	89
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 89 of 109 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTU's or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food.
Guideline Reference:	Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 5 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/18/1997-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14709, Turbidity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	19355
Pollutant:	Turbidity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	7
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Monitoring Program (R3_SCCEH) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1971-1996
	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1997-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTU's or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food.
Guideline Reference:	Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ_SCC - PAJARO R at CHITTENDEN PASS, 305PMO_SCC - PAJARO R at MOUTH]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 9/7/2000-4/3/2003.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	This monitoring program has been underway for thirty years, with changes over time to protocols, level of QA, and documentation. In general, QA documentation included with the dataset is minimal. However, data quality appears to be reasonably good.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14709, Turbidity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	12164
Pollutant:	Turbidity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	51
Number of Exceedances:	13
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 13 of 51 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTU's or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food.
Guideline Reference:	Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/26/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14709, Turbidity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	12163
Pollutant:	Turbidity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	51
Number of Exceedances:	13
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 13 of 51 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTU's or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food.
Guideline Reference:	Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/26/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14709, Turbidity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	11945
Pollutant:	Turbidity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	3
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTU's or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food.
Guideline Reference:	Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 7/6/2001-8/29/2001. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14711	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	pH
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2021
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 2.1 and 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Forty-two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on section 3.2 the site exceeded numeric objectives for conventional pollutants. According to the binomial distribution, waters shall be placed on the section 303(d) list if the number of measured exceedances supports rejection of the null hypothesis as presented in Table 3.2. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. A total of 338 of the 1490 samples exceed the numeric objective for Municipal & Domestic Supply, Non-Contact Recreation and Water Contact Recreation and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
USEPA Action (if applicable):	USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	11140
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	58
Number of Exceedances:	4
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 4 of 58 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when pH is greater than 8.4 or less than 6.5 in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/26/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	11159
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Non-Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	58
Number of Exceedances:	8
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 8 of 58 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/26/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	11160
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	58
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 58 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/26/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	10405
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Water Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	143
Number of Exceedances:	14
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 14 of 143 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for water contact recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 5 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/18/1997-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	10406
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Non-Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	143
Number of Exceedances:	14
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 14 of 143 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 5 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/18/1997-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	10407
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	143
Number of Exceedances:	7
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 7 of 143 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 5 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/18/1997-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	10404
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	143
Number of Exceedances:	14
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 14 of 143 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Section II.A.2. Municipal and Domestic Supply Objectives, Section II.A.2.a states the following: The pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 5 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/18/1997-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	10120
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	9
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when pH is greater than 8.4 or less than 6.5 in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 7/6/2001-8/31/2005. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	10137
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	9
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 9 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Section II.A.2. Municipal and Domestic Supply Objectives, Section II.A.2.a states the following: The pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 7/6/2001-8/31/2005. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	10138
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Water Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	9
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 9 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for water contact recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 7/6/2001-8/31/2005. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	10139
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Non-Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	9
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 9 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 7/6/2001-8/31/2005. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	10140
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	9
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 7/6/2001-8/31/2005. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	10121
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	9
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 7/6/2001-8/31/2005. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	13896
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Non-Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	10
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 10 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	13897
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	10
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 10 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	13877
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	10
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 10 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when pH is greater than 8.4 or less than 6.5 in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	13878
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	10
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 10 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Section II.A.2. Municipal and Domestic Supply Objectives, Section II.A.2.a states the following: The pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	11141
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	58
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 58 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/26/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	11142
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	58
Number of Exceedances:	8
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 8 of 58 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Section II.A.2. Municipal and Domestic Supply Objectives, Section II.A.2.a states the following: The pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/26/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	11143
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Water Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	58
Number of Exceedances:	8
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 8 of 58 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for water contact recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/26/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	10387
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	143
Number of Exceedances:	12
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 12 of 143 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when pH is greater than 8.4 or less than 6.5 in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 5 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/18/1997-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	10388
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	143
Number of Exceedances:	7
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 7 of 143 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 5 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/18/1997-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	19732
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	7
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Monitoring Program (R3_SCCEH) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1971-1996
	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1997-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when pH is greater than 8.4 or less than 6.5 in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ_SCC - PAJARO R at CHITTENDEN PASS, 305PMO_SCC - PAJARO R at MOUTH]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 9/7/2000-4/3/2003.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	This monitoring program has been underway for thirty years, with changes over time to protocols, level of QA, and documentation. In general, QA documentation included with the dataset is minimal. However, data quality appears to be reasonably good.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	19733
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	7
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Monitoring Program (R3_SCCEH) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1971-1996
	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1997-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ_SCC - PAJARO R at CHITTENDEN PASS, 305PMO_SCC - PAJARO R at MOUTH]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 9/7/2000-4/3/2003.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	This monitoring program has been underway for thirty years, with changes over time to protocols, level of QA, and documentation. In general, QA documentation included with the dataset is minimal. However, data quality appears to be reasonably good.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	19734
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	7
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Monitoring Program (R3_SCCEH) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1971-1996
	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1997-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Section II.A.2. Municipal and Domestic Supply Objectives, Section II.A.2.a states the following: The pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ_SCC - PAJARO R at CHITTENDEN PASS, 305PMO_SCC - PAJARO R at MOUTH]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 9/7/2000-4/3/2003.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	This monitoring program has been underway for thirty years, with changes over time to protocols, level of QA, and documentation. In general, QA documentation included with the dataset is minimal. However, data quality appears to be reasonably good.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	19735
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Water Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	7
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Monitoring Program (R3_SCCEH) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1971-1996
	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1997-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for water contact recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ_SCC - PAJARO R at CHITTENDEN PASS, 305PMO_SCC - PAJARO R at MOUTH]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 9/7/2000-4/3/2003.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	This monitoring program has been underway for thirty years, with changes over time to protocols, level of QA, and documentation. In general, QA documentation included with the dataset is minimal. However, data quality appears to be reasonably good.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	19736
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Non-Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	7
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Monitoring Program (R3_SCCEH) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1971-1996
	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1997-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ_SCC - PAJARO R at CHITTENDEN PASS, 305PMO_SCC - PAJARO R at MOUTH]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 9/7/2000-4/3/2003.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	This monitoring program has been underway for thirty years, with changes over time to protocols, level of QA, and documentation. In general, QA documentation included with the dataset is minimal. However, data quality appears to be reasonably good.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17677
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	1259
Number of Exceedances:	187
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 187 of 1259 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when pH is greater than 8.4 or less than 6.5 in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 24 monitoring sites [ PA-BET - Pajaro River at Betabel Road, PA-CHI - Pajaro River at Chittenden, PA-MUR - Pajaro River at Murphy's, PA-19, PA-20, PA-H25 PA-21, PA-22, PA-ONF PA-MNS - Pajaro River at Main, PA-23, PA-24, PA-26, PA-13, PA-27, PA-UVAS PA-14, PA-29, PA-15, PA-30, PA-16, PA-31, PA-18, PA-FLR - Pajaro River at Frazer Lake Rd.]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 10/4/2000-2/11/2007.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17678
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1259
Number of Exceedances:	104
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 104 of 1259 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 24 monitoring sites [ PA-BET - Pajaro River at Betabel Road, PA-CHI - Pajaro River at Chittenden, PA-MUR - Pajaro River at Murphy's, PA-19, PA-20, PA-H25 PA-21, PA-22, PA-ONF PA-MNS - Pajaro River at Main, PA-23, PA-24, PA-26, PA-13, PA-27, PA-UVAS PA-14, PA-29, PA-15, PA-30, PA-16, PA-31, PA-18, PA-FLR - Pajaro River at Frazer Lake Rd.]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 10/4/2000-2/11/2007.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17679
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	1259
Number of Exceedances:	309
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 309 of 1259 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Section II.A.2. Municipal and Domestic Supply Objectives, Section II.A.2.a states the following: The pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 24 monitoring sites [ PA-BET - Pajaro River at Betabel Road, PA-CHI - Pajaro River at Chittenden, PA-MUR - Pajaro River at Murphy's, PA-19, PA-20, PA-H25 PA-21, PA-22, PA-ONF PA-MNS - Pajaro River at Main, PA-23, PA-24, PA-26, PA-13, PA-27, PA-UVAS PA-14, PA-29, PA-15, PA-30, PA-16, PA-31, PA-18, PA-FLR - Pajaro River at Frazer Lake Rd.]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 10/4/2000-2/11/2007.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17680
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Water Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	1259
Number of Exceedances:	309
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 309 of 1259 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for water contact recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 24 monitoring sites [ PA-BET - Pajaro River at Betabel Road, PA-CHI - Pajaro River at Chittenden, PA-MUR - Pajaro River at Murphy's, PA-19, PA-20, PA-H25 PA-21, PA-22, PA-ONF PA-MNS - Pajaro River at Main, PA-23, PA-24, PA-26, PA-13, PA-27, PA-UVAS PA-14, PA-29, PA-15, PA-30, PA-16, PA-31, PA-18, PA-FLR - Pajaro River at Frazer Lake Rd.]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 10/4/2000-2/11/2007.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17681
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Non-Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	1259
Number of Exceedances:	309
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 309 of 1259 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 24 monitoring sites [ PA-BET - Pajaro River at Betabel Road, PA-CHI - Pajaro River at Chittenden, PA-MUR - Pajaro River at Murphy's, PA-19, PA-20, PA-H25 PA-21, PA-22, PA-ONF PA-MNS - Pajaro River at Main, PA-23, PA-24, PA-26, PA-13, PA-27, PA-UVAS PA-14, PA-29, PA-15, PA-30, PA-16, PA-31, PA-18, PA-FLR - Pajaro River at Frazer Lake Rd.]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 10/4/2000-2/11/2007.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	17694
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1259
Number of Exceedances:	104
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 104 of 1259 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
	Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 24 monitoring sites [ PA-BET - Pajaro River at Betabel Road, PA-CHI - Pajaro River at Chittenden, PA-MUR - Pajaro River at Murphy's, PA-19, PA-20, PA-H25 PA-21, PA-22, PA-ONF PA-MNS - Pajaro River at Main, PA-23, PA-24, PA-26, PA-13, PA-27, PA-UVAS PA-14, PA-29, PA-15, PA-30, PA-16, PA-31, PA-18, PA-FLR - Pajaro River at Frazer Lake Rd.]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 10/4/2000-2/11/2007.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	14112
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	10
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 10 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	13895
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Water Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	10
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 10 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for water contact recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	19093
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Non-Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Coastal Watershed Council (Snapshot day monitoring) (R3_Snap) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Volunteer Monitoring Network Data. 2003-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305-PAJAR-21 - Pajaro River under Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 5/17/2003-5/6/2006. Coastal Watershed Council Snapshot Day Monitoring is conducted annually.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	State Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	19074
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Coastal Watershed Council (Snapshot day monitoring) (R3_Snap) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Volunteer Monitoring Network Data. 2003-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when pH is greater than 8.4 or less than 6.5 in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305-PAJAR-21 - Pajaro River under Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 5/17/2003-5/6/2006. Coastal Watershed Council Snapshot Day Monitoring is conducted annually.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	State Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	19075
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Coastal Watershed Council (Snapshot day monitoring) (R3_Snap) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Volunteer Monitoring Network Data. 2003-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305-PAJAR-21 - Pajaro River under Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 5/17/2003-5/6/2006. Coastal Watershed Council Snapshot Day Monitoring is conducted annually.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	State Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	19076
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Coastal Watershed Council (Snapshot day monitoring) (R3_Snap) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Volunteer Monitoring Network Data. 2003-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Section II.A.2. Municipal and Domestic Supply Objectives, Section II.A.2.a states the following: The pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305-PAJAR-21 - Pajaro River under Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 5/17/2003-5/6/2006. Coastal Watershed Council Snapshot Day Monitoring is conducted annually.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	State Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	19094
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Coastal Watershed Council (Snapshot day monitoring) (R3_Snap) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Volunteer Monitoring Network Data. 2003-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305-PAJAR-21 - Pajaro River under Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 5/17/2003-5/6/2006. Coastal Watershed Council Snapshot Day Monitoring is conducted annually.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	State Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	19092
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Water Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Coastal Watershed Council (Snapshot day monitoring) (R3_Snap) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Volunteer Monitoring Network Data. 2003-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for water contact recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305-PAJAR-21 - Pajaro River under Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 5/17/2003-5/6/2006. Coastal Watershed Council Snapshot Day Monitoring is conducted annually.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	State Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14711, pH Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	19752
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	7
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Monitoring Program (R3_SCCEH) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1971-1996
	Final Data File used for assessment: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health data 1997-2006
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ_SCC - PAJARO R at CHITTENDEN PASS, 305PMO_SCC - PAJARO R at MOUTH]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 9/7/2000-4/3/2003.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	This monitoring program has been underway for thirty years, with changes over time to protocols, level of QA, and documentation. In general, QA documentation included with the dataset is minimal. However, data quality appears to be reasonably good.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14675	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Chlorophyll-a
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Eight lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Twenty-eight of the 219 samples exceed the Evaluation Guideline (North Carolina Administrative code, Title 15A) and the General Water Quality Objective set to protect aquatic life beneficial uses. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Twenty-eight of the 219 samples exceed the Evaluation Guideline (North Carolina Administrative code, Title 15A) and the General Water Quality Objective set to protect aquatic life beneficial uses and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14675, Chlorophyll-a Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	9300
Pollutant:	Chlorophyll-a
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	151
Number of Exceedances:	26
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 26 of 151 samples exceed the criterion for Chlorophyll a.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (general objective for biostimulatory substances, Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
	Water quality standards table
Evaluation Guideline:	North Carolina Administrative code (NCAC), Title 15A - Environmental and Natural Resources, Subchapter 2B-Surface water and wetland standards, Rule 0211-Fresh surface water quality standards for class C waters (Class C is defined as freshwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, aquatic life including propagation and survival, and wildlife). Section 3(a) of Rule 0211 applies to all fresh surface waters and states that chlorophyll a is not to exceed 40 ug/L.
Guideline Reference:	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 5 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/10/1998-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14675, Chlorophyll-a Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	11947
Pollutant:	Chlorophyll-a
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Chlorophyll a.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (general objective for biostimulatory substances, Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
	Water quality standards table
Evaluation Guideline:	North Carolina Administrative code (NCAC), Title 15A - Environmental and Natural Resources, Subchapter 2B-Surface water and wetland standards, Rule 0211-Fresh surface water quality standards for class C waters (Class C is defined as freshwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, aquatic life including propagation and survival, and wildlife). Section 3(a) of Rule 0211 applies to all fresh surface waters and states that chlorophyll a is not to exceed 40 ug/L.
Guideline Reference:	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 7/6/2001. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14675, Chlorophyll-a Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	11948
Pollutant:	Chlorophyll-a
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Chlorophyll a.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (general objective for biostimulatory substances, Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
	Water quality standards table
Evaluation Guideline:	North Carolina Administrative code (NCAC), Title 15A - Environmental and Natural Resources, Subchapter 2B-Surface water and wetland standards, Rule 0211-Fresh surface water quality standards for class C waters (Class C is defined as freshwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, aquatic life including propagation and survival, and wildlife). Section 3(a) of Rule 0211 applies to all fresh surface waters and states that chlorophyll a is not to exceed 40 ug/L.
Guideline Reference:	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 7/6/2001. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14675, Chlorophyll-a Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	13857
Pollutant:	Chlorophyll-a
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	10
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 10 samples exceed the criterion for Chlorophyll a.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (general objective for biostimulatory substances, Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
	Water quality standards table
Evaluation Guideline:	North Carolina Administrative code (NCAC), Title 15A - Environmental and Natural Resources, Subchapter 2B-Surface water and wetland standards, Rule 0211-Fresh surface water quality standards for class C waters (Class C is defined as freshwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, aquatic life including propagation and survival, and wildlife). Section 3(a) of Rule 0211 applies to all fresh surface waters and states that chlorophyll a is not to exceed 40 ug/L.
Guideline Reference:	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14675, Chlorophyll-a Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	13856
Pollutant:	Chlorophyll-a
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	10
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 10 samples exceed the criterion for Chlorophyll a.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (general objective for biostimulatory substances, Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
	Water quality standards table
Evaluation Guideline:	North Carolina Administrative code (NCAC), Title 15A - Environmental and Natural Resources, Subchapter 2B-Surface water and wetland standards, Rule 0211-Fresh surface water quality standards for class C waters (Class C is defined as freshwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, aquatic life including propagation and survival, and wildlife). Section 3(a) of Rule 0211 applies to all fresh surface waters and states that chlorophyll a is not to exceed 40 ug/L.
Guideline Reference:	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14675, Chlorophyll-a Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	9367
Pollutant:	Chlorophyll-a
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	57
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 57 samples exceed the criterion for Chlorophyll a.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (general objective for biostimulatory substances, Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
	Water quality standards table
Evaluation Guideline:	North Carolina Administrative code (NCAC), Title 15A - Environmental and Natural Resources, Subchapter 2B-Surface water and wetland standards, Rule 0211-Fresh surface water quality standards for class C waters (Class C is defined as freshwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, aquatic life including propagation and survival, and wildlife). Section 3(a) of Rule 0211 applies to all fresh surface waters and states that chlorophyll a is not to exceed 40 ug/L.
Guideline Reference:	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 5/31/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14675, Chlorophyll-a Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	9368
Pollutant:	Chlorophyll-a
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	57
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 57 samples exceed the criterion for Chlorophyll a.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (general objective for biostimulatory substances, Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
	Water quality standards table
Evaluation Guideline:	North Carolina Administrative code (NCAC), Title 15A - Environmental and Natural Resources, Subchapter 2B-Surface water and wetland standards, Rule 0211-Fresh surface water quality standards for class C waters (Class C is defined as freshwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, aquatic life including propagation and survival, and wildlife). Section 3(a) of Rule 0211 applies to all fresh surface waters and states that chlorophyll a is not to exceed 40 ug/L.
Guideline Reference:	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 5/31/2001-12/18/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14675, Chlorophyll-a Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	9301
Pollutant:	Chlorophyll-a
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	151
Number of Exceedances:	26
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 26 of 151 samples exceed the criterion for Chlorophyll a.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (general objective for biostimulatory substances, Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
	Water quality standards table
Evaluation Guideline:	North Carolina Administrative code (NCAC), Title 15A - Environmental and Natural Resources, Subchapter 2B-Surface water and wetland standards, Rule 0211-Fresh surface water quality standards for class C waters (Class C is defined as freshwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, aquatic life including propagation and survival, and wildlife). Section 3(a) of Rule 0211 applies to all fresh surface waters and states that chlorophyll a is not to exceed 40 ug/L.
Guideline Reference:	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 5 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing, 305PAJ-Pajaro River at Betabel Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305THU-Pajaro River at Thurwachter Bridge]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/10/1998-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	14697	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Unknown Toxicity
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 and section 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Twelve lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant in water samples. One of the samples were toxic to test organisms (exhibited a significant increase in mortality or decrease in cell density compared to the laboratory control) and therefore do not exceed the narrative General Objective for toxicity, set to protect for aquatic life beneficial uses. The following is a summary of the results from individual toxicity tests. None of the 15 samples (tested for toxicity to plants) exhibited significant reduction in cell density relative to the control. In addition, none of the 15 samples (tested for toxicity to vertebrate test organisms) exhibited a significant increase in mortality compared to the laboratory control. However, one of the 15 samples, tested for toxicity to invertebrate test organisms exhibited a significant increase in mortality compared to the laboratory control. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 15 samples (tested for toxicity to plants) exhibited significant reduction in cell density relative to the control. In addition, none of the 15 samples (tested for toxicity to vertebrate test organisms) exhibited a significant increase in mortality compared to the laboratory control. However, one of the 15 samples, tested for toxicity to invertebrate test organisms exhibited a significant increase in mortality compared to the laboratory control. None of these exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are not exceeded.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14697, Unknown Toxicity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	24607
Pollutant:	Invertebrate Toxicity
LOE Subgroup:	Toxicity
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	7
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	TOXICITY TESTING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPnorth) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Ceriodaphnia dubia Survival (%) 7 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival.
Guideline Reference:	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street and 305CHI].
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected between 2/21/06 and 9/26/06. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14697, Unknown Toxicity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	24444
Pollutant:	Plant Toxicity
LOE Subgroup:	Toxicity
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	7
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	TOXICITY TESTING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPnorth) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Selenastrum capricornutum Growth (Cell Density) 4 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Significant reduction in cell count of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and cell count <80% of control.
Guideline Reference:	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14697, Unknown Toxicity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	24443
Pollutant:	Vertebrate Toxicity
LOE Subgroup:	Toxicity
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	8
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	TOXICITY TESTING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Pimephales promelas Survival (%) 7 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival.
Guideline Reference:	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ001 - Pajaro River at Y Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 1/10/2006-5/30/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14697, Unknown Toxicity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	24575
Pollutant:	Plant Toxicity
LOE Subgroup:	Toxicity
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	8
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	TOXICITY TESTING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Selenastrum capricornutum Growth (Cell Density) 4 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Significant reduction in cell count of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and cell count <80% of control.
Guideline Reference:	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ001 - Pajaro River at Y Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 1/10/2006-5/30/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14697, Unknown Toxicity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	24576
Pollutant:	Plant Toxicity
LOE Subgroup:	Toxicity
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	8
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	TOXICITY TESTING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Selenastrum capricornutum Growth (Cell Density) 4 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Significant reduction in cell count of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and cell count <80% of control.
Guideline Reference:	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ001 - Pajaro River at Y Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 1/10/2006-5/30/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14697, Unknown Toxicity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	24445
Pollutant:	Plant Toxicity
LOE Subgroup:	Toxicity
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	7
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	TOXICITY TESTING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPnorth) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Selenastrum capricornutum Growth (Cell Density) 4 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Significant reduction in cell count of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and cell count <80% of control.
Guideline Reference:	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14697, Unknown Toxicity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	24606
Pollutant:	Invertebrate Toxicity
LOE Subgroup:	Toxicity
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	7
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	TOXICITY TESTING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPnorth) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Ceriodaphnia dubia Survival (%) 7 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival.
Guideline Reference:	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street and 305CHI - Pajaro River at Chittinen Gap].
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected between 2/21/06 and 9/26/06. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14697, Unknown Toxicity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	24618
Pollutant:	Invertebrate Toxicity
LOE Subgroup:	Toxicity
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	8
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	TOXICITY TESTING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Ceriodaphnia dubia Survival (%) 7 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival.
Guideline Reference:	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ001 - Pajaro River at Y Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 1/10/2006-5/30/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14697, Unknown Toxicity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	24617
Pollutant:	Invertebrate Toxicity
LOE Subgroup:	Toxicity
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	8
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	TOXICITY TESTING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Ceriodaphnia dubia Survival (%) 7 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival.
Guideline Reference:	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ001 - Pajaro River at Y Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 1/10/2006-5/30/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14697, Unknown Toxicity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	24622
Pollutant:	Vertebrate Toxicity
LOE Subgroup:	Toxicity
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	8
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	TOXICITY TESTING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Pimephales promelas Survival (%) 7 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival.
Guideline Reference:	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ 305PAJ001 - Pajaro River at Y Road, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street, 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305MUR-Pajaro River at Murphy's Crossing]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 1/10/2006-5/30/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14697, Unknown Toxicity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	24621
Pollutant:	Vertebrate Toxicity
LOE Subgroup:	Toxicity
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	7
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	TOXICITY TESTING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPnorth) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Pimephales promelas Survival (%) 7 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival.
Guideline Reference:	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14697, Unknown Toxicity Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	24620
Pollutant:	Vertebrate Toxicity
LOE Subgroup:	Toxicity
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	7
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	TOXICITY TESTING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPnorth) data for Pajaro River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Pimephales promelas Survival (%) 7 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
	Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival.
Guideline Reference:	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Pajaro River was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ 305CHI-Pajaro River at Chittenden Gap, 305PJP-Pajaro River at Main Street]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	6237	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Nutrients
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	Agricultural Return Flows | Agriculture | Agriculture-irrigation tailwater | Agriculture-storm runoff | Agriculture-subsurface drainage | Channelization | Irrigated Crop Production | Nonpoint Source | Removal of Riparian Vegetation | Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers | Wastewater - land disposal
TMDL Name:	Pajaro River Nitrate (including Llagas Creek) TMDL
TMDL Project Code:	139
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA:	10/13/2006
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for listing under section 2.2 of the Listing Policy. Under this section of the Policy, a minimum of one line of evidence is needed to assess listing status. The Pajaro River Nutrients TMDL was approved by the RWQCB in December 2005 and subsequently approved by USEPA in October 2006. Based on the readily available information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination in the Water Quality Limited Segments Being Addressed portion of the section 303(d) list.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The decision has not changed.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available information for this recommendation, SWRCB staff conclude that the water body pollutant combination should be placed in the Water Quality Limited Segments Being Addressed category of the section 303(d) list because a TMDL has been approved.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6237, Nutrients Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	1852
Pollutant:	Nutrients
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Not Recorded
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:
Number of Exceedances:
Data and Information Type:	Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006.
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:
Objective/Criterion Reference:
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:
Temporal Representation:
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	QA Info Missing
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	6585	Region 3
Pajaro River

Pollutant:	Sedimentation/Siltation
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	Agriculture | Grazing-Related Sources | Highway/Road/Bridge Runoff | Silviculture | Streambank Modification/Destabilization | Surface Mining | Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers
TMDL Name:	Pajaro River Siltation/Sedimentation (including San Benito R., Llagas Cr., Rider Gulch Cr.)
TMDL Project Code:	140
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA:	05/03/2007
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for listing under section 2.2 of the Listing Policy. Under this section of the Policy, a minimum of one line of evidence is needed to assess listing status. The Pajaro River Siltation/Sedimentation (including San Benito R., Llagas Cr., Rider Gulch Cr.) TMDL and implementation plan was approved for this water segment-pollutant combination by USEPA on 5/03/07. Based on the readily available information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination in the Water Quality Limited Segments Being Addressed portion of the section 303(d) list.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The decision has not changed.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available information for this recommendation, SWRCB staff conclude that the water body pollutant combination should be placed in the Water Quality Limited Segments Being Addressed category of the section 303(d) list because a TMDL has been approved.
USEPA Action (if applicable):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 6585, Sedimentation/Siltation Region 3      Pajaro River
LOE ID:	1851
Pollutant:	Sedimentation/Siltation
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Not Recorded
Beneficial Use:	Cold Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	0
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006.
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:
Objective/Criterion Reference:
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:
Temporal Representation:
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	QA Info Missing
QAPP Information Reference(s):