Water Body Name: | Santa Clara River Reach 5 (Blue Cut gaging station to West Pier Hwy 99 Bridge) (was named Santa Clara River Reach 7 on 2002 303(d) list) |
Water Body ID: | CAR4035100019990203102901 |
Water Body Type: | River & Stream |
DECISION ID |
7166 |
Region 4 |
Santa Clara River Reach 5 (Blue Cut gaging station to West Pier Hwy 99 Bridge) (was named Santa Clara River Reach 7 on 2002 303(d) list) |
||
Pollutant: | Ammonia |
Final Listing Decision: | Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)(2006) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Reason for Delisting: | Applicable WQS attained; reason for recovery unspecified |
TMDL Name: | Santa Clara River Nitrogen (32) |
TMDL Project Code: | 227 |
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA: | 03/18/2004 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for removal from the section 303(d) list under section 4.1 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
Three lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification for removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Two of 117 samples exceeded the pH and temperature dependent Basin Plan 30-day average objective for ammonia and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. A remedial program other than a TMDL had been developed, approved, and implemented. This program was expected to result in attainment of the standard. 5. The USEPA final decision for the 2006 303(d) list added this listing to the 'being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL' portion of the 303(d) List because the Santa Clara River Nitrogen TMDL and implementation plan was approved for this water segment-pollutant combination by USEPA on 03/18/2004. 6. Analysis of the data, after USEPA approval of the TMDL and implementation of nitrification and denitrification, indicate that standards are being currently attained. 7. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are not being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
USEPA Action (if applicable): | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 2117 | ||||
Pollutant: | Ammonia | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Warm Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 71 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 2 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Two of 71 samples exceeded the 30-day average water quality objective and none of 95 samples exceeded the one-hour average water quality objective (LACSD, 2004b; LACSD, 2006). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Los Angeles RWQCB Basin Plan Amendment 2003: The one-hour average objective is dependent on pH and the presence or absence of early life stages of fish (ELS) but not temperature. The 30-day average objective is dependent on pH, temperature and ELS [Tables 3-1 to 3-3]. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | USEPA 1999 Update of Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Three receiving water stations: RC, RD, and RE. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected from July 2003 through November 2005. New management practices were begun at the beginning of this period and may have resulted in a change in water quality. Water quality measurements collected before the implementation of management measures were not considered representative of current conditions. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | QA Info Missing | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 30255 | ||||
Pollutant: | Ammonia | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Warm Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Aquatic Life Use: | Freshwater Replenishment | Preservation of Rare & Endangered Species | Wetland Habitat | Wildlife Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 45 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | 0 of 45 samples exceeded the Basin Plan 30-day average objective for ammonia. The pH data used for this analysis ranged from 7.18 - 8.47. The temperature data used for this analysis ranged from 10.8 - 28.7 C. There were 45 pH and temperature data points corresponding to 45 ammonia samples used in this analysis. Water quality samples were taken and analyzed for ammonia in accordance County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County Monitoring and Reporting Program. | ||||
Data Reference: | NPDES receiving water monitoring reports for Saugus Water Reclamation Plant (NPDES No. CA0054313) and Valencia Water Reclamation Plant (NPDES No. CA0054216). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan states, "In order to protect aquatic life, ammonia concentrations in inland surface waters characteristic of freshwater shall not exceed the values calculated for the appropriate instream conditions shown in Tables 3-1 to 3-3." The one-hour average objective is dependent on pH and the presence or absence of early life stages of fish (ELS) but not temperature. The 30-day average objective is dependent on pH, temperature and ELS in Tables 3-1 to 3-3. The ammonia objectives and the pH and temperature dependent formulas are found in Attachment A of Regional Board Resolution No. 2002-011. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The listed monitoring stations for this water body pollutant combination include: RC located approximately 300 feet upstream of point of discharge 001 to the river, RD located approximately 300 feet downstream of point of discharge 001 to the river, and RE located approximately 1.6 miles upstream of Chiquita Canyon Road. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Grab samples were taken and analyzed on a monthly basis from December 2005 to February 2007. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected in compliance with the sampling and monitoring procedures detailed in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County's Valencia Water Reclamation Plant (NPDES No. CA0054216) Monitoring and Reporting Program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Valencia Water Reclamation Plant Monitoring and reporting program for NPDES No. CA0054216 (County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County) | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 2115 | ||||
Pollutant: | Ammonia | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Narrative Description Data | ||||
Matrix: | Not Specified | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Warm Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | An alternative enforceable program is in place that will address ammonia water quality standards exceedances for this Reach. In June 1995, the seven water reclamation plants discharging in the San Gabriel River and Santa Clara River watersheds received NPDES permits containing requirements regarding compliance with the Basin Plan water quality objectives for ammonia. In accordance with these permits, the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts have been pursuing the addition of
nitrification and denitrification facilities at each of these plants to comply with the ammonia objectives. By June 2003, it is expected that these new facilities will be operational and ammonia will be drastically reduced. Research facility operation shows that the monthly average ammonia concentration fully complies with the chronic ammonia objective that are expected to be applicable in June 2003 (SWRCB, 2003). It is probable that the majority of ammonia discharged to this water body was contributed by POTWs. Information in the record indicates that the majority (over 95%) of the ammonia in the Los Angeles River was contributed by POTWs. It is probable that the contribution in the San Gabriel River watershed is dominated by contributions from POTWs as well. Generally, concentrations of ammonia upstream of the treatment plants is much lower than downstream concentrations (up to an order of magnitude difference). |
||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | |||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | |||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | |||||
Temporal Representation: | |||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | QA Info Missing | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
4102 |
Region 4 |
Santa Clara River Reach 5 (Blue Cut gaging station to West Pier Hwy 99 Bridge) (was named Santa Clara River Reach 7 on 2002 303(d) list) |
||
Pollutant: | Nitrate and Nitrite |
Final Listing Decision: | Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)(2006) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Reason for Delisting: | Applicable WQS attained; reason for recovery unspecified |
TMDL Name: | Santa Clara River Nitrogen (32) |
TMDL Project Code: | 227 |
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA: | 03/18/2004 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for removal from the section 303(d) list under section 4.1 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
Three lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification for removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Nine of 133 samples exceeded the Basin Plan reach specific water quality objective for nitrate-nitrogen plus nitrite-nitrogen and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. A remedial program other than a TMDL had been developed, approved, and implemented. This program was expected to result in attainment of the standard. 5. The USEPA final decision for the 2006 303(d) list added this listing to the 'being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL' portion of the 303(d) List because the Santa Clara River Nitrogen TMDL and implementation plan was approved for this water segment-pollutant combination by USEPA on 03/18/2004. 6. Analysis of the data, after USEPA approval of the TMDL and implementation of nitrification and denitrification, indicate that standards are being currently attained. 7. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are not being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
USEPA Action (if applicable): | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 2113 | ||||
Pollutant: | Nitrate and Nitrite | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 29 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 2 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Two of 29 samples exceed the water quality objective (LACSD, 2004b). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Los Angeles RWQCB Basin Plan: Water shall not exceed 5 mg/L as nitrate-nitrogen plus nitrite-nitrogen as applicable for the protection of existing water quality conditions [Table 3-8]. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were taken at four samples stations RC, RD, RE, and RB01. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were taken from 9/10/03 to 5/12/04 at monthly intervals. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The Districts' Valencia Water Reclamation Plant, which is located in Reach 7, was partially converted to NDN mode starting May 12, 2003, and was fully converted to NDN mode on June 18, 2003. The implementation of NDN at these WRPs represents a significant change in water quality nitrogen conditions in Reach 5 of the Santa Clara River. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Quality Assurance Document Of The County Sanitation Districts Of Los Angeles County. July 2003. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 2114 | ||||
Pollutant: | Nitrate and Nitrite | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 8 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of 8 samples exceed the water quality objective. Data obtained from the United Water Conservation District (LACSD, 2004b). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Los Angeles RQWCB Basin Plan: Water shall not exceed 5 mg/L as nitrate-nitrogen plus nitrite-nitrogen as applicable for the protection of existing water quality conditions [Table 3-8]. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Blue Cut sampling site near Los Angeles/ Ventura county line. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were taken at monthly intervals from 9/10/03 to 4/27/04. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Fruit Growers Laboratory Quality Manual. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 30270 | ||||
Pollutant: | Nitrate and Nitrite | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 96 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 7 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Seven of 96 samples exceeded the Basin Plan reach specific water quality objective for nitrate-nitrogen plus nitrite-nitrogen. Water quality samples were taken and analyzed for nitrate-nitrogen plus nitrite-nitrogen in accordance County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County Monitoring and Reporting Program. | ||||
Data Reference: | NPDES receiving water monitoring reports for Saugus Water Reclamation Plant (NPDES No. CA0054313) and Valencia Water Reclamation Plant (NPDES No. CA0054216). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan lists a reach specific water quality objective of 5.0 mg/L for nitrate-nitrogen plus nitrite-nitrogen (NO3-N + NO2-N). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The listed monitoring stations for this water body pollutant combination include: RC located approximately 300 feet upstream of point of discharge 001 to the river, RD located approximately 300 feet downstream of point of discharge 001 to the river, and RE located approximately 1.6 miles upstream of Chiquita Canyon Road. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Grab samples were taken and analyzed on a monthly basis from June 2004 to February 2007. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected in compliance with the sampling and monitoring procedures detailed in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County's Valencia Water Reclamation Plant (NPDES No. CA0054216) Monitoring and Reporting Program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Valencia Water Reclamation Plant Monitoring and reporting program for NPDES No. CA0054216 (County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County) | ||||
DECISION ID |
18003 |
Region 4 |
Santa Clara River Reach 5 (Blue Cut gaging station to West Pier Hwy 99 Bridge) (was named Santa Clara River Reach 7 on 2002 303(d) list) |
||
Pollutant: | Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | State Board Review and Conclusion:
The April 19, 2010 State Water Board staff report for the 2010 Integrated Report recommended to place this water body on the 303(d) list for benthic-macroinvertebrate bioassessments based on the following: This assessment is based on data for one sample site originally thought to be located and assessed in Reach 6. It has been determined that the sample site actually resides in Santa Clara River Reach 5. State Water Board staff used Section 3.11 situation-specific weight of evidence approach to evaluate the Los Angeles Water Board benthic-macroinvertebrate bioassessment listing. State Water Board staff determined that it is necessary to include these listings because additional data analyses and multiple line of evidence show that benthic macroinvertebrate populations are impacted by a wide range of stressors. Multiple lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this indicator. The water quality chemistry data for iron and chlorides show that water quality standards are not being met. The water quality chemistry and bioassessment data provide a substantial basis that benthic macroinvertebrate populations are impacted by a wide range of anthropogenic stressors. The weight of evidence indicate that the beneficial use of the water is not supported. Based on the available data and information, staff recommend to list for benthic macroinvertebrate-bioassessment. At the June 15, 2010 State Water Board meeting for approval of the 2010 Integrated Report, the State Water Board directed staff to reevaluate the listing recommendation for this water body-pollutant combination. Based on this reevaluation, State Water Board staff continued to recommend to place this water body on the 303(d) list for benthic-macroinvertebrate bioassessment.. At the August 4, 2010 State Water Board's followup Board meeting for approval of the 2010 Integrated Report, the State Water Board did not approve the staff recommendation and decided to not place this water body on the 303(d) list benthic-macroinvertebrate bioassessment. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | N/A |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the State Water Board staff recommendation, the State Water Board recommends that this water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are being exceeded. |
USEPA Action (if applicable): | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 31432 | ||||
Pollutant: | Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Population/Community Degradation | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Warm Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 4 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 4 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Four out of 4 samples had IBI scores ranked in the "poor" or "very poor" range during the fall seasons of 2001, 2003, and 2004. | ||||
Data Reference: | A Quantitative Tool for Assessing the Integrity of Southern Coastal California Streams. Appendix 7-B Environmental Management Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 493-504. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Los Angeles RWQCB Basin Plan Objectives for Toxicity which states "All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant or animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, bioassays of appropriate duration or other appropraite methods as specified by the State or Regional Board." | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The IBI is a multi-metric assessment that employs biological metrics that respond to a habitat or water quality impairment. Each of the biological metrics measured at a site are converted to an IBI score then summed. These cumulative scores are then ranked according to very good (80-56), good (41-55), fair (27-40), poor (14-39) and very poor (0-13) habitat conditions. Sites with scores below 26 are considered to have impaired conditions. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | A Quantitative Tool for Assessing the Integrity of Southern Coastal California Streams. Appendix 7-B Environmental Management Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 493-504. | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Three sites were used to collect samples: Station 1 - SCR Unlined Channel @ Old Rd., SCR-BC, and SCR-004 | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected during the fall seasons of 2001, 2003, and 2004. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected in compliance with California Stream Bioassessment Procedure. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
9808 |
Region 4 |
Santa Clara River Reach 5 (Blue Cut gaging station to West Pier Hwy 99 Bridge) (was named Santa Clara River Reach 7 on 2002 303(d) list) |
||
Pollutant: | Chlorodibromomethane |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of 33 samples exceeded the the California Toxics Rule Human Health Organism Consumption Criteria for chlorodibromomethane and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
USEPA Action (if applicable): | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 21177 | ||||
Pollutant: | Chlorodibromomethane | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 33 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Zero of 33 samples exceeded the California Toxics Rule Human Health Organism Consumption Criteria for chlorodibromomethane. Water quality samples were taken for chlorodibromomethane in accordance with County Sanitation Districts monitoring parameters. | ||||
Data Reference: | NPDES receiving water monitoring reports for Saugus Water Reclamation Plant (NPDES No. CA0054313) and Valencia Water Reclamation Plant (NPDES No. CA0054216). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The California Toxics Rule lists a Human Health organism consumption criteria of 34 ug/L for chlorodibromomethane to protect human health. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The County Sanitation District of Los Angeles County conducted sampling at Santa Clara Reach 5 at the following monitoring stations : RC located approximately 300 feet upstream of point of discharge 001 to the river, RD located approximately 300 feet downstream of point of discharge 001 to the river, and RE located approximately 1.6 miles upstream of Chiquita Canyon Road. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Grab samples were taken and analyzed on quarterly basis from July 2004 to February 2007 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected in compliance with the sampling and monitoring procedures detailed in NPDES Permit No. CA0054216 Monitoring and Reporting Program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Valencia Water Reclamation Plant Monitoring and reporting program for NPDES No. CA0054216 (County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County) | ||||
DECISION ID |
9056 |
Region 4 |
Santa Clara River Reach 5 (Blue Cut gaging station to West Pier Hwy 99 Bridge) (was named Santa Clara River Reach 7 on 2002 303(d) list) |
||
Pollutant: | DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is not sufficient justification for placing the water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. One of two SWAMP samples exceed the CTR human health for consumption of water and organisms and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Zero of 18 Valencia WWRP samples exceed the CTR human health for consumption of water and organisms and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 5. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
USEPA Action (if applicable): | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 30239 | ||||
Pollutant: | DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 18 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Zero of 18 samples exceeded the California Toxics Rule Human Health consumption of water and organisms criteria for DDT. | ||||
Data Reference: | NPDES receiving water monitoring reports for Saugus Water Reclamation Plant (NPDES No. CA0054313) and Valencia Water Reclamation Plant (NPDES No. CA0054216). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The California Toxics Rule lists a Human Health consumption of water and organisms criteria of 0.00059 ug/L for DDT. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The listed monitoring stations for this water body pollutant combination include: RC located approximately 300 feet upstream of point of discharge 001 to the river, RD located approximately 300 feet downstream of point of discharge 001 to the river, and RE located approximately 1.6 miles upstream of Chiquita Canyon Road. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Grab samples taken and analyzed from July 2004 to February 2007. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Data collected for compliance with Valencia WWRP MRP. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Valencia Water Reclamation Plant Monitoring and reporting program for NPDES No. CA0054216 (County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County) | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 8313 | ||||
Pollutant: | DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | One of two samples exceeded the California Toxics Rule Human Health consumption of water and organisms criteria for DDT. Water quality samples were taken and analyzed for DDT in accordance with SWAMP Monitoring and testing parameters. | ||||
Data Reference: | Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program data for all watersheds in the Los Angeles Region 2001-2005. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The California Toxics Rule lists a Human Health consumption of water and organisms criteria of 0.00059 ug/L for DDT. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The listed monitoring stations for this water body pollutant combination include: 403STCCTC located at Castaic Creek (Lat: 34.49668, Long: -118.61228) and 403STCNRB Newhall Ranch Blue Cut (Lat: 34.40177, Long: -118.70119). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Grab samples were taken on 11/13/2001 at monitoring stations 403STCCTC and 403STCNRB and on 10/30/2001 at monitoring station 403STCNRB. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected in compliance with the sampling and monitoring procedures detailed in State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Management Plan. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version) | ||||
DECISION ID |
9068 |
Region 4 |
Santa Clara River Reach 5 (Blue Cut gaging station to West Pier Hwy 99 Bridge) (was named Santa Clara River Reach 7 on 2002 303(d) list) |
||
Pollutant: | Dichlorobromomethane |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of 33 samples exceeded the California Toxics Rule Human Health Organism Consumption Criteria for dichlorobromomethane and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
USEPA Action (if applicable): | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 8346 | ||||
Pollutant: | Dichlorobromomethane | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 33 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Zero of 33 samples exceeded the California Toxics Rule Human Health Criteria Organism Consumption Criteria for dichlorobromomethane. Water quality samples were taken for dichlorobromomethane in accordance with County Sanitation Districts monitoring parameters. | ||||
Data Reference: | NPDES receiving water monitoring reports for Saugus Water Reclamation Plant (NPDES No. CA0054313) and Valencia Water Reclamation Plant (NPDES No. CA0054216). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The California Toxics Rule lists a Human Health Organism Consumption Criteria of 46 ug/L for dichlorobromomethane to protect human health. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The listed monitoring stations for this water body pollutant combination include: RC located approximately 300 feet upstream of point of discharge 001 to the river, RD located approximately 300 feet downstream of point of discharge 001 to the river, and RE located approximately 1.6 miles upstream of Chiquita Canyon Road. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Grab samples were taken and analyzed on quarterly basis from July 2004 to February 2007 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected in compliance with the sampling and monitoring procedures detailed in NPDES Permit No. CA0054216 Monitoring and Reporting Program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Valencia Water Reclamation Plant Monitoring and reporting program for NPDES No. CA0054216 (County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County) | ||||
DECISION ID |
5392 |
Region 4 |
Santa Clara River Reach 5 (Blue Cut gaging station to West Pier Hwy 99 Bridge) (was named Santa Clara River Reach 7 on 2002 303(d) list) |
||
Pollutant: | PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is not sufficient justification for placing the water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. There are 1 out of 2 samples that exceed the CTR human health for consumption of water and organisms and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
USEPA Action (if applicable): | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 2123 | ||||
Pollutant: | PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Warm Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Two summations of all PCB congeners with 1 exceeding the CTR (SWAMP, 2004). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | California Toxics Rule (CTR) Freshwater Criterion Continuous Concentration 0.014 ug/L (40 CFR Part 131). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | SWAMP monitoring site Newhall Ranch Blue Cut (403STCCTC). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected in October and November of 2001. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SWAMP Quality Assurance Plan. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 21325 | ||||
Pollutant: | PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Warm Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Aquatic Life Use: | Freshwater Replenishment | Preservation of Rare & Endangered Species | Wetland Habitat | Wildlife Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | One of two samples exceeded the California Toxics Rule lists a human health for consumption of water and organisms limit. Water quality samples were taken and analyzed for PCBs in accordance with SWAMP Monitoring and testing parameters. | ||||
Data Reference: | Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program data for all watersheds in the Los Angeles Region 2001-2005. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The California Toxics Rule lists a human health for consumption of water and organisms limit of 0.017 ug/L for Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Monitoring station 403STCNRB Newhall Ranch Blue Cut (Lat: 34.40177, Long: -118.70119). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Grab samples were taken on 11/13/2001 and on 10/30/2001. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected in compliance with the sampling and monitoring procedures detailed in State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Management Plan. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version) | ||||
DECISION ID |
9316 |
Region 4 |
Santa Clara River Reach 5 (Blue Cut gaging station to West Pier Hwy 99 Bridge) (was named Santa Clara River Reach 7 on 2002 303(d) list) |
||
Pollutant: | Specific Conductivity |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Six of 104 County Sanitation District of Los Angeles County samples exceed the Agricultural Water Quality Goals published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. One of eight SWAMP samples exceed the Agricultural Water Quality Goals published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 5. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
USEPA Action (if applicable): | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 30230 | ||||
Pollutant: | Specific Conductance | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Agricultural Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 104 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 6 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Six of 104 samples exceeded the Agricultural Water Quality Goals published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations for specific conductance. | ||||
Data Reference: | NPDES receiving water monitoring reports for Saugus Water Reclamation Plant (NPDES No. CA0054313) and Valencia Water Reclamation Plant (NPDES No. CA0054216). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Agricultural Water Quality Goals published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations is 1512 umhos/cm for Specific Conductance. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality for Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev 1, Rome (1985) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The listed monitoring stations for this water body pollutant combination include: RC located approximately 300 feet upstream of point of discharge 001 to the river, RD located approximately 300 feet downstream of point of discharge 001 to the river, and RE located approximately 1.6 miles upstream of Chiquita Canyon Road. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Grab samples taken and analyzed on monthly basis from June 2004 to February 2007. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected in compliance with the sampling and monitoring procedures detailed in NPDES Permit No. CA0054216 Monitoring and Reporting Program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Valencia Water Reclamation Plant Monitoring and reporting program for NPDES No. CA0054216 (County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County) | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 8755 | ||||
Pollutant: | Specific Conductance | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Agricultural Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 8 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | One of eight samples exceeded the Agricultural Water Quality Goals published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations for specific conductance. Water quality samples were taken for specific conductance in accordance with regional SWAMP Monitoring parameters. | ||||
Data Reference: | Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program data for all watersheds in the Los Angeles Region 2001-2005. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Agricultural Water Quality Goals published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations is 1512 umhos/cm for Specific Conductance. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality for Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev 1, Rome (1985) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The Los Angeles Regional Board sampled and measured specific conductance at Santa Clara River Reach 5 at the following stations : 403STC004 located near Chiquito Canyon Road-Newhall Property, 403STC029 located at Elizabeth Canyon (Lat: 34.6145, Long: -118.55852), 403STC065 located at Elizabeth Canyon (Lat: 34.63099, Long: -118.5359), 403STC068 located in the river (Lat: 34.40565, Long: -118.67533), 403STCCTC located at Castaic Creek (Lat: 34.49668, Long: -118.61228), and 403STCNRB Newhall Ranch Blue Cut. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Grab samples were taken on 02/20/2003 at monitoring stations 403STC029 and 403STC065; on 02/25/2003 at monitoring stations 403STC004 and 403STC068; on 11/13/2001 at monitoring stations 403STCCTC and 403STCNRB; and on 10/30/2001 at monitoring stations 403STC004 and 403STCNRB. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected in compliance with the sampling and monitoring procedures detailed in State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Management Plan. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version) | ||||
DECISION ID |
9302 |
Region 4 |
Santa Clara River Reach 5 (Blue Cut gaging station to West Pier Hwy 99 Bridge) (was named Santa Clara River Reach 7 on 2002 303(d) list) |
||
Pollutant: | Iron |
Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Sources: | Source Unknown |
Expected TMDL Completion Date: | 2021 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Nine of 30 samples exceeded the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Freshwater Aquatic Life Protection for Iron and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
USEPA Action (if applicable): | USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 4799 | ||||
Pollutant: | Iron | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Warm Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Aquatic Life Use: | Freshwater Replenishment | Preservation of Rare & Endangered Species | Wetland Habitat | Wildlife Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 30 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 9 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Nine of 30 samples exceeded the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Freshwater Aquatic Life Protection for Iron. Water quality samples were taken for Iron in accordance County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County monitoring and reporting program. | ||||
Data Reference: | NPDES receiving water monitoring reports for Saugus Water Reclamation Plant (NPDES No. CA0054313) and Valencia Water Reclamation Plant (NPDES No. CA0054216). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Freshwater Aquatic Life Protection is 1 mg/L. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | National recommended water quality criteria: 2002. EPA-822-R-02-047 Washington, D.C. USEPA | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The listed monitoring stations for this water body pollutant combination include: RC located approximately 300 feet upstream of point of discharge 001 to the river, RD located approximately 300 feet downstream of point of discharge 001 to the river, and RE located approximately 1.6 miles upstream of Chiquita Canyon Road. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Grab samples were taken and analyzed on quarterly basis from July 2004 to February 2007 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Data collected for compliance with Valencia WWRP Monitoring and Reporting Program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Valencia Water Reclamation Plant Monitoring and reporting program for NPDES No. CA0054216 (County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County) | ||||
DECISION ID |
5385 |
Region 4 |
Santa Clara River Reach 5 (Blue Cut gaging station to West Pier Hwy 99 Bridge) (was named Santa Clara River Reach 7 on 2002 303(d) list) |
||
Pollutant: | Aluminum |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006) |
Revision Status | Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing the water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. There are 3 samples available but there is no applicable water quality standard available with which to assess them. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | The decision has not changed. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
USEPA Action (if applicable): | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 2118 | ||||
Pollutant: | Aluminum | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Warm Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | There are 3 samples available but there is no applicable water quality standard available with which to assess them (SWAMP, 2004). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | There is no applicable water quality standard for this pollutant in this water body for the assigned beneficial use(s). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The Santa Clara River Reach 5 monitoring stations are located within the Santa Clara River between West Pier Highway 99 and Blue Cut gauging station. Stations were located on Castaic Creek and Blue Cut. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected in October and November of 2001. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SWAMP Quality Assurance Plan. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
5379 |
Region 4 |
Santa Clara River Reach 5 (Blue Cut gaging station to West Pier Hwy 99 Bridge) (was named Santa Clara River Reach 7 on 2002 303(d) list) |
||
Pollutant: | Diazinon |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006) |
Revision Status | Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. One of 31 samples exceeded the Criterion Continuous Concentration of 0.10 ug/L and none of 31 samples exceeded the Criterion Maximum Concentration of 0.16 ug/L for the protection of aquatic life beneficial uses. This does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | The decision has not changed. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
USEPA Action (if applicable): | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 2121 | ||||
Pollutant: | Diazinon | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Warm Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 31 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Samples include data points from the District's receiving water Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Valencia WRP and SWRCB's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. One of 31 samples exceed the criteria (LACSD, 2006). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | No individual pesticide or combination or pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (LARWQCB Basin Plan). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Diazinon - CDFG Hazard Assessment Criteria - 0.10 ug/L Criterion Continuous Concentration and 0.16 ug/L Criterion Maximum Concentration (Siepman & Finlayson, 2000; Finlayson, 2004). | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The Santa Clara River Reach 5 (between West Pier Highway 99 and Blue Cut gauging station) data collected at 403STC004, 403STC019, 403STCNRB, SCR-RC, SCR-RD, and SCR-RE. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected from October 2001 through July 2005. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | QA Info Missing | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
5391 |
Region 4 |
Santa Clara River Reach 5 (Blue Cut gaging station to West Pier Hwy 99 Bridge) (was named Santa Clara River Reach 7 on 2002 303(d) list) |
||
Pollutant: | Phosphate |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006) |
Revision Status | Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The line of evidence documents the presence of the pollutant. However, there is no applicable guideline for phosphate that meets the requirements of section 6.1.3 of the Listing Policy. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient information to justify placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that there is no applicable guideline for this pollutant that meets the requirements of section 6.1.3 of the Listing Policy and therefore it is not possible to determine any exceedances of the pollutant in this water body segment. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | The decision has not changed. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
USEPA Action (if applicable): | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 2122 | ||||
Pollutant: | Phosphate | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Not Recorded | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Warm Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 7 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 3 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Seven water samples, three samples exceeding. Surface water data presented within the report "Water Quality in the Calleguas Creek and Santa Clara River Watersheds Under the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Fiscal Year 2000-2001" as prepared by the Marine Pollution Studies Laboratory Moss Landing Marine Laboratories for the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board. (SWAMP, 2004). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growth to the extent that such growth causes nuisance or adversely affects beneficial uses. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | USEPA recommended limit (0.01 mg/l), 1986. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Six stations. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected in October and November of 2001. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The Santa Clara River Reach 5 monitoring stations are located within the Santa Clara River between West Pier Highway 99 and Blue Cut gauging station. Stations were located on Castaic Creek and Blue Cut. | ||||
QAPP Information: | SWAMP Quality Assurance Plan. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
7297 |
Region 4 |
Santa Clara River Reach 5 (Blue Cut gaging station to West Pier Hwy 99 Bridge) (was named Santa Clara River Reach 7 on 2002 303(d) list) |
||
Pollutant: | Coliform Bacteria |
Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006) |
Revision Status | Original |
Sources: | Nonpoint Source | Point Source |
Expected TMDL Completion Date: | 2019 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | 303(d) listing decisions made prior to 2006 were not held in an assessment database. The Regional Boards will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | The decision has not changed. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
USEPA Action (if applicable): | USEPA approved the listing of this water body as a water quality limited segment requiring a TMDL for this pollutant. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 4156 | ||||
Pollutant: | Coliform Bacteria | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Not Recorded | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Unspecified | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Unspecified | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Unspecified | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Unspecified | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Unspecified | ||||
QAPP Information: | Unspecified | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
4206 |
Region 4 |
Santa Clara River Reach 5 (Blue Cut gaging station to West Pier Hwy 99 Bridge) (was named Santa Clara River Reach 7 on 2002 303(d) list) |
||
Pollutant: | Chloride |
Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)(2006) |
Revision Status | Original |
Sources: | Nonpoint Source | Point Source |
TMDL Name: | Santa Clara River Chloride (31) |
TMDL Project Code: | 226 |
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA: | 04/28/2005 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for delisting under section 4.1 of the Listing Policy. Under this section of the Policy, a minimum of one line of evidence is needed to assess listing status.
Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on the readily available information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination in the Water Quality Limited Segments portion of the section 303(d) list. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Forty-five out of 53 samples exceed the water quality objective and this exceeds the allowable frequency in table 4.1. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. The Santa Clara River Chloride TMDL was approved by SWRCB in July 2004 and subsequently approved by the Office of Administrative Law on November 15, 2004. USEPA approved the TMDL on April 28, 2005. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | The decision has not changed. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
USEPA Action (if applicable): | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 2120 | ||||
Pollutant: | Chloride | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Not Recorded | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Agricultural Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 46 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 41 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Forty-one of 46 samples exceeded the site specific objective (SWAMP, 2004). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Los Angeles Region site specific WQ Objective for Santa Clara River, Reach 5 is 100 mg/L. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | One sample site. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected from 1/11/2000 to 1/27/2005. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Data Collected by the United Water Conservation District during 2000 and 2005. Station sampled is located at Blue Cut Gauging Station near the county line. | ||||
QAPP Information: | United Water Conservation District QAPP. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 2119 | ||||
Pollutant: | Chloride | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Not Recorded | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Agricultural Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 7 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 4 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Seven water samples, four samples exceeding (SWAMP, 2004). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Los Angeles Region site specific WQ Objective for Santa Clara River, Reach 5 is 100 mg/l. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Seven stations. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected in October and November of 2001. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The Santa Clara River Reach 5 monitoring stations are located within the Santa Clara River between West Pier Highway 99 and Blue Cut gauging station. Stations were located on Castaic Creek and Blue Cut. | ||||
QAPP Information: | SWAMP Quality Assurance Plan. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||