Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 19391, Sedimentation/Siltation
|
Region 3 |
Goleta Slough/Estuary |
|
|
LOE ID: |
499 |
|
Pollutant: |
Sedimentation/Siltation |
LOE Subgroup: |
Adverse Biological Responses |
Matrix: |
Not Specified |
Fraction: |
|
|
Beneficial Use: |
Estuarine Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Not Specified |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Goleta Slough was placed on the section 303(d) list because Regional Board Staff observed erosion and sedimentation in the 1980s.
This listing is faulty because no data is available to support the listing. Regional Board staff are not aware of evidence to indicate current water quality standards exceedances or beneficial use impacts related to the listing for this pollutant. |
Data Reference: |
Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Basin Plan: The suspended sediment load and suspended sediment discharge rate of surface waters shall not be altered in such a manner as to cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
|
Temporal Representation: |
|
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
No data or QA/QC information available. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Region 3 data was not included in the 2012 Integrated Report so all decisions are carried over from the 2010 listing cycle. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because the sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met. |
|
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 25755, Ammonia (Unionized)
|
Region 3 |
Goleta Slough/Estuary |
|
|
LOE ID: |
10550 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Goleta SloughEstuary to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 (General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries) states that the discharge of wastes shall not cause concentrations of unionized ammonia (NH3) to exceed 0.025 mg/l (as N) in receiving waters (page III-4) . |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Goleta SloughEstuary was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315GOS-Goleta Slough at the Airport] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 3/7/2001. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorophyll-a |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Region 3 data was not included in the 2012 Integrated Report so all decisions are carried over from the 2010 listing cycle. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 25818, Chlorophyll-a
|
Region 3 |
Goleta Slough/Estuary |
|
|
LOE ID: |
10551 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorophyll-a |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Goleta SloughEstuary to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Chlorophyll a. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (general objective for biostimulatory substances, Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards |
|
Water quality standards table |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
North Carolina Administrative code (NCAC), Title 15A - Environmental and Natural Resources, Subchapter 2B-Surface water and wetland standards, Rule 0211-Fresh surface water quality standards for class C waters (Class C is defined as freshwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, aquatic life including propagation and survival, and wildlife). Section 3(a) of Rule 0211 applies to all fresh surface waters and states that chlorophyll a is not to exceed 40 ug/L. |
Guideline Reference: |
North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards |
|
North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Goleta SloughEstuary was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315GOS-Goleta Slough at the Airport] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 3/7/2001. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Region 3 data was not included in the 2012 Integrated Report so all decisions are carried over from the 2010 listing cycle. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because the sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met. |
|
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 25985, Fecal Coliform
|
Region 3 |
Goleta Slough/Estuary |
|
|
LOE ID: |
12317 |
|
Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Goleta SloughEstuary to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Coliform, Fecal. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: Fecal coliform concentration, based on a minimum of not less than five samples for any 30-day period, shall not exceed a log mean of 2000/100 ml, nor shall more than ten percent of samples collected during any 30-day period exceed 4000/100 ml. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Goleta SloughEstuary was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315GOS-Goleta Slough at the Airport] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 3/7/2001. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 25985, Fecal Coliform
|
Region 3 |
Goleta Slough/Estuary |
|
|
LOE ID: |
12316 |
|
Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Goleta SloughEstuary to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Coliform, Fecal. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for water contact recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: Fecal coliform concentration, based on a minimum of not less than five samples for any 30-day period, shall not exceed a log mean of 200 MPN/100 ml, nor shall more than ten percent of total samples during any 30-day period exceed 400 MPN/100 ml. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Goleta SloughEstuary was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315GOS-Goleta Slough at the Airport] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 3/7/2001. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Low Dissolved Oxygen |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Region 3 data was not included in the 2012 Integrated Report so all decisions are carried over from the 2010 listing cycle. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 25986, Low Dissolved Oxygen
|
Region 3 |
Goleta Slough/Estuary |
|
|
LOE ID: |
14159 |
|
Pollutant: |
Dissolved oxygen saturation |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Goleta SloughEstuary to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Saturation. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: Median values should not fall below 85% saturation as a result of controllable water quality conditions. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Goleta SloughEstuary was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315GOS-Goleta Slough at the Airport] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 3/7/2001. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 25986, Low Dissolved Oxygen
|
Region 3 |
Goleta Slough/Estuary |
|
|
LOE ID: |
14098 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Goleta SloughEstuary to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 5.0 mg/l at any time. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Goleta SloughEstuary was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315GOS-Goleta Slough at the Airport] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 3/7/2001. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Region 3 data was not included in the 2012 Integrated Report so all decisions are carried over from the 2010 listing cycle. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because the sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met. |
|
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 25987, Turbidity
|
Region 3 |
Goleta Slough/Estuary |
|
|
LOE ID: |
14176 |
|
Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Goleta SloughEstuary to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTU's or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Goleta SloughEstuary was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315GOS-Goleta Slough at the Airport] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 3/7/2001. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Region 3 data was not included in the 2012 Integrated Report so all decisions are carried over from the 2010 listing cycle. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because the sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met. |
|
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 25820, pH
|
Region 3 |
Goleta Slough/Estuary |
|
|
LOE ID: |
12334 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Goleta SloughEstuary to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Goleta SloughEstuary was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315GOS-Goleta Slough at the Airport] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 3/7/2001. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 25820, pH
|
Region 3 |
Goleta Slough/Estuary |
|
|
LOE ID: |
12333 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Goleta SloughEstuary to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Goleta SloughEstuary was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315GOS-Goleta Slough at the Airport] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 3/7/2001. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 25820, pH
|
Region 3 |
Goleta Slough/Estuary |
|
|
LOE ID: |
12318 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Goleta SloughEstuary to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for water contact recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Goleta SloughEstuary was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315GOS-Goleta Slough at the Airport] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 3/7/2001. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Pathogens |
Final Listing Decision: |
List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Sources: |
Natural Sources | Source Unknown | Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers |
Expected TMDL Completion Date: |
2013 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Region 3 data was not included in the 2012 Integrated Report so all decisions are carried over from the 2010 listing cycle. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
No new data were assessed for 2012. The decision has not changed. |
|
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Pollutant: |
Priority Organics |
Final Listing Decision: |
List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Sources: |
Source Unknown |
Expected TMDL Completion Date: |
2021 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Region 3 data was not included in the 2012 Integrated Report so all decisions are carried over from the 2010 listing cycle. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
No new data were assessed for 2012. The decision has not changed. |
|
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|