Water Body Name: | Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek |
Water Body ID: | CAR1142201319990614135920 |
Water Body Type: | River & Stream |
DECISION ID |
25721 |
Region 1 |
Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Indicator Bacteria |
Final Listing Decision: | Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Reason for Delisting: | Not a true delisting. Delisting due to spatial change or other CalWQA administrative reason |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This is not a true delisting. This water body (Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek) has been split into two water bodies for the current Integrated Report cycle: (1) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek and (2) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek.
The data assessed in this decision during the 2010 Integrated Report cycle were collected in both the mainstem of Santa Rosa Creek and tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek. Therefore, these data are now split up according to where they were collected, and are now assessed under one of the two new water bodies listed above. This water body will no longer be used and will be retired after this Integrated Report cycle. For this current Integrated Report cycle, and in the future, please refer to the two new water bodies listed above for data and information pertaining to Santa Rosa Creek and its tributaries. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | This is not a true delisting. Data originally included in this decision are now evaluated under either the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek" water body or the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek" water body depending on where the data were collected. Please see these two new water bodies for decisions on this pollutant. This water body will be retired next Integrated Report cycle. |
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6196 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 5 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 4 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Four of the 5 total coliform samples from Santa Rosa Creek exceed the evaluation guideline. Sample concentrations range from 1,550 to 48,600 MPN / 100 ml. The samples were collected as part of the Russian River First Flush sampling event. Data are summarized by Katznelson et al. (2003). | ||||
Data Reference: | 2002 Russian River First Flush Summary Report. Clean Water Team, Citizen Monitoring Program of the State Water Resources Control Board | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Per the Basin Plan (NCRWQCB 2007): The bacteriological quality of waters of the North Coast Region shall not be degraded beyond natural background levels. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - North Coast Region (Region 1) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Per the "Draft Guidance for Fresh Water Beaches" (DHS 2006): Beach posting is recommended when single sample total coliform levels exceed 10,000 MPN / 100 ml. *Note: MPN is the most probable number of coliform units. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Draft Guidance for Fresh Water Beaches. Last Update: May 8, 2006. Initial Draft: November 1997. California Department of Public Health. | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected from 5 sites in the Santa Rosa Creek Watershed as follows: (1) in Piner Creek at Fulton Road; (2) in Santa Rosa Creek at Fulton Road; (3) at Matanzas Creek at Doyle Park; (4) in Santa Rosa Creek at Yulupa Avenue; and (5) in Santa Rosa Creek at Melita Road. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected on November 7, 2002. At each site, 2 or 3 instantaneous grab samples were collected over half hour increments. The data are averaged for each site. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Samples were collected during the first runoff event of the rainy season. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected in accordance with the study plan and quality control procedures described by Katznelson et al. (2003). | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | 2002 Russian River First Flush Summary Report. Clean Water Team, Citizen Monitoring Program of the State Water Resources Control Board | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 7090 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 111 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 43 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Forty-three of 111 total coliform samples collected from Santa Rosa Creek exceed the evaluation guideline. Sample concentrations range from less than 100 to 111,990 MPN / 100 ml. The samples were collected as part of a joint monitoring effort by the Regional Water Board, the City of Santa Rosa, and the Sonoma County Department of Health Services Environmental Health Division. Data are summarized by the Regional Water Board (NCRWQCB 2008). | ||||
Data Reference: | Summary of Santa Rosa Creek Bacteria Data. Data collected by the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board, City of Santa Rosa, and Sonoma County Department of Health Services Environmental Health Division. Data downloaded from https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/northcoast/water_issues/programs/water_quality_sampling/santa_rosa_creek.shtml on August 27, 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Per the Basin Plan (NCRWQCB 2007): The bacteriological quality of waters of the North Coast Region shall not be degraded beyond natural background levels. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - North Coast Region (Region 1) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Per the "Draft Guidance for Fresh Water Beaches" (DHS 2006): Beach posting is recommended when single sample total coliform levels exceed 10,000 MPN / 100 ml. *Note: MPN is the most probable number of coliform units. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Draft Guidance for Fresh Water Beaches. Last Update: May 8, 2006. Initial Draft: November 1997. California Department of Public Health. | ||||
Spatial Representation: | In 2001, samples were collected from 29 sites in Santa Rosa Creek from the Wilson Street/Railroad Street bridge upstream to Cougar Lane. In 2002 and 2005 to 2008, samples were collected from Santa Rosa Creek at Prince Memorial Greenway, just downstream of the Highway 101 bridge. In 2007, samples were also collected from Santa Rosa Creek at 300 Los Alamos Road behind Villa Los Alamos Condominiums. Samples were collected approximately 6 inches below the surface. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | In 2001, samples were collected for 1 to 3 times at each site from June to October. In 2002 and 2005 to 2008, samples were collected roughly once a week from Memorial Day to Labor Day. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | There are no known environmental conditions (e.g., seasonality, land use practices, fire events, storms, etc.) that are related to these data. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected in general accordance with the methods described in "Bacteria sampling at the Prince Memorial Greenway-2005" (City of Santa Rosa 2005). | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Bacteria Sampling at Prince Greenway - 2005 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 7098 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 108 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 77 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Seventy-seven of the 108 E. coli samples from Santa Rosa Creek exceed the evaluation guideline. Concentrations range from 41 to greater than 24,192 MPN / 100 ml. The samples were collected as part of a joint monitoring effort by the Regional Water Board, the City of Santa Rosa, and the Sonoma County Department of Health Services Environmental Health Division. Data are summarized by the Regional Water Board (NCRWQCB 2008). | ||||
Data Reference: | Summary of Santa Rosa Creek Bacteria Data. Data collected by the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board, City of Santa Rosa, and Sonoma County Department of Health Services Environmental Health Division. Data downloaded from https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/northcoast/water_issues/programs/water_quality_sampling/santa_rosa_creek.shtml on August 27, 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Per the Basin Plan (NCRWQCB 2007): The bacteriological quality of waters of the North Coast Region shall not be degraded beyond natural background levels. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - North Coast Region (Region 1) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Per the "Draft Guidance for Fresh Water Beaches" (DHS 2006): Beach posting is recommended when single sample E. coli levels exceed 235 MPN / 100 ml. *Note: MPN is the most probable number of coliform units. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Draft Guidance for Fresh Water Beaches. Last Update: May 8, 2006. Initial Draft: November 1997. California Department of Public Health. | ||||
Spatial Representation: | In 2001, samples were collected from 29 sites in Santa Rosa Creek from the Wilson Street/Railroad Street bridge upstream to Cougar Lane. In 2002 and 2005 to 2008, samples were collected from Santa Rosa Creek at Prince Memorial Greenway, just downstream of the Highway 101 bridge. In 2007, samples were also collected from Santa Rosa Creek at 300 Los Alamos Road behind Villa Los Alamos Condominiums. Samples were collected approximately 6 inches below the surface. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | In 2001, samples were collected for 1 to 3 times at each site from June to October. In 2002 and 2005 to 2008, samples were collected roughly once a week from Memorial Day to Labor Day. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | There are no known environmental conditions (e.g., seasonality, land use practices, fire events, storms, etc.) that are related to these data. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected in general accordance with the methods described in "Bacteria sampling at the Prince Memorial Greenway-2005" (City of Santa Rosa 2005). | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Bacteria Sampling at Prince Greenway - 2005 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 7107 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 85 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 55 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Fifty-five of 85 Enterococcus samples collected from Santa Rosa Creek exceed the evaluation guideline. Sample concentrations range from 0 to 12,033 MPN / 100 ml. The samples were collected as part of a joint monitoring effort by the Regional Water Board, the City of Santa Rosa, and the Sonoma County Department of Health Services Environmental Health Division. Data are summarized by the Regional Water Board (NCRWQCB 2008). | ||||
Data Reference: | Summary of Santa Rosa Creek Bacteria Data. Data collected by the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board, City of Santa Rosa, and Sonoma County Department of Health Services Environmental Health Division. Data downloaded from https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/northcoast/water_issues/programs/water_quality_sampling/santa_rosa_creek.shtml on August 27, 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Per the Basin Plan (NCRWQCB 2007): The bacteriological quality of waters of the North Coast Region shall not be degraded beyond natural background levels. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - North Coast Region (Region 1) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Per the "Draft Guidance for Fresh Water Beaches" (DHS 2006): Beach posting is recommended when single sample Enterococcus levels exceed 61 MPN / 100 ml. *Note: MPN is the most probable number of coliform units. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Draft Guidance for Fresh Water Beaches. Last Update: May 8, 2006. Initial Draft: November 1997. California Department of Public Health. | ||||
Spatial Representation: | In 2001, samples were collected from 29 sites in Santa Rosa Creek from the Wilson Street/Railroad Street bridge upstream to Cougar Lane. In 2002 and 2005 to 2008, samples were collected from Santa Rosa Creek at Prince Memorial Greenway, just downstream of the Highway 101 bridge. In 2007, samples were also collected from Santa Rosa Creek at 300 Los Alamos Road behind Villa Los Alamos Condominiums. Samples were collected approximately 6 inches below the surface. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | In 2001, samples were collected from 1 to 3 times at each site from June to October. In 2002 and 2005 to 2008, samples were collected roughly once a week from Memorial Day to Labor Day. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | There are no known environmental conditions (e.g., seasonality, land use practices, fire events, storms, etc.) that are related to these data. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected in general accordance with the methods described in "Bacteria sampling at the Prince Memorial Greenway-2005" (City of Santa Rosa 2005). | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Bacteria Sampling at Prince Greenway - 2005 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 7103 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 45 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 45 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | All of the 45 E. coli samples collected from Santa Rosa Creek exceed the fecal coliform objective. E. coli samples were collected while fecal coliform samples were not collected. Since E. coli is one of the group of bacteria that comprise the fecal coliform group, it is logical that if median E. coli concentrations for any 30-day period are greater than 50 MPN / 100 ml, then the median fecal coliform concentrations for any 30-day period are also greater than 50 MPN / 100 ml. Of the 69 E. coli samples collected, 45 median E. coli concentration values were calculated based on a minimum of not less than 5 samples for any 30-day period. Of these 45 median values, all 45 exceed the objective. E. coli median values range from 200 to 2,187 MPN / 100 ml. The samples were collected as part of a joint monitoring effort by the Regional Water Board, the City of Santa Rosa, and the Sonoma County Department of Health Services Environmental Health Division. Data are summarized by the Regional Water Board (NCRWQCB 2008). | ||||
Data Reference: | Summary of Santa Rosa Creek Bacteria Data. Data collected by the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board, City of Santa Rosa, and Sonoma County Department of Health Services Environmental Health Division. Data downloaded from https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/northcoast/water_issues/programs/water_quality_sampling/santa_rosa_creek.shtml on August 27, 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Per the Basin Plan (NCRWQCB 2007): The bacteriological quality of waters of the North Coast Region shall not be degraded beyond natural background levels. In no case shall coliform concentrations in waters of the North Coast Region exceed the following: In waters designated for contact recreation (REC-1), the median fecal coliform concentration based on a minimum of not less than five samples for any 30-day period shall not exceed 50 MPN* / 100 ml, nor shall more than 10% of total samples during any 30-day period exceed 400 MPN / 100 ml. *Note: MPN is the most probable number of coliform units. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - North Coast Region (Region 1) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | In 2002 and 2005 to 2008, samples were collected from Santa Rosa Creek at Prince Memorial Greenway, just downstream of the Highway 101 bridge. In 2007, samples were also collected from Santa Rosa Creek at 300 Los Alamos Road behind Villa Los Alamos Condominiums. Samples were collected approximately 6 inches below the surface. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected roughly once a week from Memorial Day to Labor Day. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | There are no known environmental conditions (e.g., seasonality, land use practices, fire events, storms, etc.) that are related to these data. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected in general accordance with the methods described in "Bacteria sampling at the Prince Memorial Greenway-2005" (City of Santa Rosa 2005). | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Bacteria Sampling at Prince Greenway - 2005 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6194 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 5 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 5 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | All 5 of the 5 E. coli samples from Santa Rosa Creek exceed the evaluation guideline. Concentrations range from 301 to 76,000 MPN / 100 ml. The samples were collected as part of the Russian River First Flush sampling event. Data are summarized by Katznelson et al. (2003). | ||||
Data Reference: | 2002 Russian River First Flush Summary Report. Clean Water Team, Citizen Monitoring Program of the State Water Resources Control Board | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Per the Basin Plan (NCRWQCB 2007): The bacteriological quality of waters of the North Coast Region shall not be degraded beyond natural background levels. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - North Coast Region (Region 1) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Per the "Draft Guidance for Fresh Water Beaches" (DHS 2006): Beach posting is recommended when single sample E. coli levels exceed 235 MPN / 100 ml. *Note: MPN is the most probable number of coliform units. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Draft Guidance for Fresh Water Beaches. Last Update: May 8, 2006. Initial Draft: November 1997. California Department of Public Health. | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected from 5 sites in the Santa Rosa Creek Watershed as follows: (1) in Piner Creek at Fulton Road; (2) in Santa Rosa Creek at Fulton Road; (3) at Matanzas Creek at Doyle Park; (4) in Santa Rosa Creek at Yulupa Avenue; and (5) in Santa Rosa Creek at Melita Road. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected on November 7, 2002. At each site, 2 or 3 instantaneous grab samples were collected over half hour increments. The data are averaged for each site. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Samples were collected during the first runoff event of the rainy season. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected in accordance with the study plan and quality control procedures described by Katznelson et al. (2003). | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | 2002 Russian River First Flush Summary Report. Clean Water Team, Citizen Monitoring Program of the State Water Resources Control Board | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 7106 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 22 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 6 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Six of the 22 fecal coliform samples collected from Santa Rosa Creek exceed the evaluation guideline. Since less than 5 samples over a 30-day period were collected, the evaluation guideline is used for comparison to the samples. Sample concentrations range from less than 100 to 5,000 MPN / 100 ml. The samples were collected as part of a joint monitoring effort by the Regional Water Board, the City of Santa Rosa, and the Sonoma County Department of Health Services Environmental Health Division. Data are summarized by the Regional Water Board (NCRWQCB 2008). | ||||
Data Reference: | Summary of Santa Rosa Creek Bacteria Data. Data collected by the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board, City of Santa Rosa, and Sonoma County Department of Health Services Environmental Health Division. Data downloaded from https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/northcoast/water_issues/programs/water_quality_sampling/santa_rosa_creek.shtml on August 27, 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Per the Basin Plan (NCRWQCB 2007): The bacteriological quality of waters of the North Coast Region shall not be degraded beyond natural background levels. In no case shall coliform concentrations in waters of the North Coast Region exceed the following: In waters designated for contact recreation (REC-1), the median fecal coliform concentration based on a minimum of not less than five samples for any 30-day period shall not exceed 50 MPN* / 100 ml, nor shall more than 10% of total samples during any 30-day period exceed 400 MPN / 100 ml. *Note: MPN is the most probable number of coliform units. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - North Coast Region (Region 1) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Per the "Draft Guidance for Fresh Water Beaches" (DHS 2006): Beach posting is recommended when single sample fecal coliform levels exceed 400 MPN / 100 ml. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Draft Guidance for Fresh Water Beaches. Last Update: May 8, 2006. Initial Draft: November 1997. California Department of Public Health. | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from 29 sites in Santa Rosa Creek from the Wilson Street/Railroad Street bridge upstream to Cougar Lane. Samples were collected approximately 6 inches below the surface. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected from 1 to 3 times at each site from June to October 2001. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | There are no known environmental conditions (e.g., seasonality, land use practices, fire events, storms, etc.) that are related to these data. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected in general accordance with the methods described in "Bacteria sampling at the Prince Memorial Greenway-2005" (City of Santa Rosa 2005). | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Bacteria Sampling at Prince Greenway - 2005 | ||||
DECISION ID |
20105 |
Region 1 |
Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Sedimentation/Siltation |
Final Listing Decision: | Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Reason for Delisting: | Not a true delisting. Delisting due to spatial change or other CalWQA administrative reason |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This is not a true delisting. This water body (Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek) has been split into two water bodies for the current Integrated Report cycle: (1) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek and (2) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek.
The information assessed in this decision during the 2010 Integrated Report (and previous) cycle(s) was for both the mainstem of Santa Rosa Creek and tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek. Therefore, the information is now evaluated under each of the two new water bodies listed above. This water body will no longer be used and will be retired after this Integrated Report cycle. For this current Integrated Report cycle, and in the future, please refer to the two new water bodies listed above for data and information pertaining to Santa Rosa Creek and its tributaries. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | This is not a true delisting. Information originally included in this decision are now evaluated under both the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek" water body and the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek" water body. Please see these two new water bodies for decisions on this pollutant. This water body will be retired next Integrated Report cycle. |
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 4772 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sedimentation/Siltation | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | |||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | |||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | |||||
Temporal Representation: | |||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Unspecified | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
20106 |
Region 1 |
Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Temperature, water |
Final Listing Decision: | Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Reason for Delisting: | Not a true delisting. Delisting due to spatial change or other CalWQA administrative reason |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This is not a true delisting. This water body (Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek) has been split into two water bodies for the current Integrated Report cycle: (1) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek and (2) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek.
The information assessed in this decision during the 2010 Integrated Report (and previous) cycle(s) was for both the mainstem of Santa Rosa Creek and tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek. Therefore, the information is now evaluated under each of the two new water bodies listed above. This water body will no longer be used and will be retired after this Integrated Report cycle. For this current Integrated Report cycle, and in the future, please refer to the two new water bodies listed above for data and information pertaining to Santa Rosa Creek and its tributaries. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | This is not a true delisting. Information originally included in this decision are now evaluated under both the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek" water body and the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek" water body. Please see these two new water bodies for decisions on this pollutant. This water body will be retired next Integrated Report cycle. |
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 4773 | ||||
Pollutant: | Temperature, water | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | |||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | |||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | |||||
Temporal Representation: | |||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Unspecified | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
29517 |
Region 1 |
Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Aldrin | Atrazine | Azinphos, Ethyl (Ethyl Guthion) | Bolstar | Carbofuran | Chlordane | Chlorothalonil | Chlorpyrifos | Chlorpyrifos, methyl | Ciodrin | Dacthal | Demeton s | Dichlofenthion | Dichlorvos | Dieldrin | Dimethoate | Dioxathion | Dyfonate (Fonofos or Fonophos) | Endrin | Endrin Ketone | Ethion | Ethoprop | Famphur | Fenchlorphos | Fenitrothion | Fensulfothion | Fenthion | Glyphosate | Heptachlor | Heptachlor epoxide | Hexachlorobenzene/ HCB | Hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH), alpha | Hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH), beta | Leptophos | Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH) | Merphos | Methidathion | Methoxychlor | Methyl Parathion | Mevinphos | Molinate | Naled | Oxadiazon | Oxychlordane | Phorate | Phosmet | Phosphamidon | Prometon (Prometone) | Prometryn | Propazine | Secbumeton | Simazine | Simetryn | Sulfotep | Tedion | Terbufos | Terbuthylazine | Terbutryn | Tetrachlorvinphos | Thiobencarb/Bolero | Thionazin | Tokuthion | Toxaphene | Trichlorfon | Trichloronate | beta-BHC (Benzenehexachloride or beta-HCH) | cis-Nonachlor | delta-BHC (Benzenehexachloride or delta-HCH) | o,p'-DDD (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane)) | o,p'-DDE (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene) | p,p'-DDD (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane) | p,p'-DDE | p,p'-DDMU | trans-Nonachlor |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This water body (Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek) has been split into two water bodies for the current Integrated Report cycle: (1) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek and (2) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek.
The data assessed in this decision during the 2010 Integrated Report cycle were collected in the mainstem of Santa Rosa Creek and therefore are now assessed under the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek" water body. This water body will no longer be used and will be retired after this Integrated Report cycle. For this current Integrated Report cycle, and in the future, please refer to the two new water bodies listed above for data and information pertaining to Santa Rosa Creek and its tributaries. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | Data originally included in this decision are now evaluated under the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek" water body. Please see that water body for a decision on this pollutant. This water body will be retired next Integrated Report cycle. |
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 30167 | ||||
Pollutant: | Aldrin | Atrazine | Carbofuran | Chlordane | Chlorpyrifos | Dacthal | Dieldrin | Endrin | Glyphosate | Heptachlor | Heptachlor epoxide | Hexachlorobenzene/ HCB | Hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH), alpha | Hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH), beta | Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH) | Methoxychlor | Molinate | Simazine | Thiobencarb/Bolero | Toxaphene | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 461 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 461 pesticide samples collected in Santa Rosa Creek exceed the objective as all of the samples were either measured as non-detect or were measured as detected but not quantified with reporting limits below objectives or evaluation guidelines. The samples were analyzed for 95 pesticides, pesticide constituents, isomers, or metabolites. For each of the 95 pesticide analytes, 3 to 5 samples were collected. The samples were collected as part of the Surface Water Ambient Water Monitoring Program (SWAMP). The data are found in the 5-Year Monitoring Report (NCRWQCB 2008). | ||||
Data Reference: | Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP). Summary Report for the North Coast Region (RWQCB-1) for years 2000-2006. North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. March 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Per the Basin Plan (NCRWQCB 2007): No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. There shall be no bioaccumulation of pesticide concentrations found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Waters designated for use as domestic or municipal supply shall not contain concentrations of pesticides in excess of the limiting concentrations set forth in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15, Article 4, Section 64444, and listed in Table 3.2 of the Basin Plan.
No evaluation guidelines for the dissolved fractions of the pesticides assessed for this waterbody for the Municipal & Domestic Supply beneficial use could be found that meet the requirements of Section 6.1.3 of the Listing Policy. |
||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - North Coast Region (Region 1) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Hexachlorocyclohexane, alpha (0.0026 ug/l)
Hexachlorocyclohexane, beta (0.0091ug/l) Aldrin (0.000049 ug/l) Atrazine (0.001 ug/l) Carbofuran (0.04 mg/l) Chlordane (0.0001 ug/l) Chlorpyrifos (0.083 ug/l) Dacthal (70 ug/l) Dieldrin (0.00014 ug/l) Endrin (0.002 ug/l) Glyphosate (700 ug/l) Heptachlor (0.01 ug/l) Heptachlor epoxide (0.01 ug/l) Hexachlorobenzene/ HCB (0.001 ug/l) Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH) (.98 ug/l) Methoxychlor (0.03 mg/l) Molinate (0.02 mg/l) Simazine (0.04 mg/l) Thiobencarb/Bolero (0.07 mg/l) Toxaphene (0.003 mg/l) |
||||
Guideline Reference: | National recommended water quality criteria: 2002. EPA-822-R-02-047 Washington, D.C. USEPA | ||||
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency | |||||
California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15. Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from Santa Rosa Creek at Willowside Road (SWAMP Station ID 114SRCWS1). Samples were collected from well-mixed flows in glides or riffles. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected as grab samples during six site visits from June 2001 to April 2005. Samples were collected over 5 site visits from October 2004 to June 2005. Site visits corresponded to fall, winter, spring and early summer seasonal conditions. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | There are no known environmental conditions (e.g., seasonality, land use practices, fire events, storms, etc.) that are related to these data. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Quality control was conducted in accordance with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (SWAMP 2002). | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 29969 | ||||
Pollutant: | Azinphos, Ethyl (Ethyl Guthion) | Bolstar | Carbofuran | Chlorothalonil | Chlorpyrifos, methyl | Ciodrin | Demeton s | Dichlofenthion | Dichlorvos | Dimethoate | Dioxathion | Dyfonate (Fonofos or Fonophos) | Endrin Ketone | Ethion | Ethoprop | Famphur | Fenchlorphos | Fenitrothion | Fensulfothion | Fenthion | Leptophos | Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH) | Merphos | Methidathion | Methyl Parathion | Mevinphos | Naled | Oxadiazon | Oxychlordane | Phorate | Phosmet | Phosphamidon | Prometon (Prometone) | Prometryn | Propazine | Secbumeton | Simetryn | Sulfotep | Tedion | Terbufos | Terbuthylazine | Terbutryn | Tetrachlorvinphos | Thiobencarb/Bolero | Thionazin | Tokuthion | Trichlorfon | Trichloronate | beta-BHC (Benzenehexachloride or beta-HCH) | cis-Nonachlor | delta-BHC (Benzenehexachloride or delta-HCH) | o,p'-DDD (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane)) | o,p'-DDE (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene) | p,p'-DDD (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane) | p,p'-DDE | p,p'-DDMU | trans-Nonachlor | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 461 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 461 pesticide samples collected in Santa Rosa Creek exceed the objective as all of the samples were either measured as non-detect or were measured as detected but not quantified with reporting limits below objectives or evaluation guidelines. The samples were analyzed for 95 pesticides, pesticide constituents, isomers, or metabolites. For each of the 95 pesticide analytes, 3 to 5 samples were collected. The samples were collected as part of the Surface Water Ambient Water Monitoring Program (SWAMP). The data are found in the 5-Year Monitoring Report (NCRWQCB 2008). | ||||
Data Reference: | Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP). Summary Report for the North Coast Region (RWQCB-1) for years 2000-2006. North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. March 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Per the Basin Plan (NCRWQCB 2007): No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. There shall be no bioaccumulation of pesticide concentrations found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Waters designated for use as domestic or municipal supply shall not contain concentrations of pesticides in excess of the limiting concentrations set forth in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15, Article 4, Section 64444, and listed in Table 3.2 of the Basin Plan.
No evaluation guidelines for the dissolved fractions of the pesticides assessed for this waterbody for the Municipal & Domestic Supply beneficial use could be found that meet the requirements of Section 6.1.3 of the Listing Policy. |
||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - North Coast Region (Region 1) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from Santa Rosa Creek at Willowside Road (SWAMP Station ID 114SRCWS1). Samples were collected from well-mixed flows in glides or riffles. . | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected over 5 site visits from October 2004 to June 2005. Site visits corresponded to fall, winter, spring and early summer seasonal conditions. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | There are no known environmental conditions (e.g., seasonality, land use practices, fire events, storms, etc.) that are related to these data. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Quality control was conducted in accordance with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (SWAMP 2002). | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
24448 |
Region 1 |
Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Aluminum |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This water body (Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek) has been split into two water bodies for the current Integrated Report cycle: (1) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek and (2) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek.
The data assessed in this decision during the 2010 Integrated Report cycle were collected in the mainstem of Santa Rosa Creek and therefore are now assessed under the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek" water body. This water body will no longer be used and will be retired after this Integrated Report cycle. For this current Integrated Report cycle, and in the future, please refer to the two new water bodies listed above for data and information pertaining to Santa Rosa Creek and its tributaries. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | Data originally included in this decision are now evaluated under the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek" water body. Please see that water body for a decision on this pollutant. This water body will be retired next Integrated Report cycle. |
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 25389 | ||||
Pollutant: | Aluminum | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 5 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 5 aluminum samples collected from Santa Rosa Creek exceed the objective. The samples were collected as part of the Surface Water Ambient Water Monitoring Program (SWAMP). The data are found in the SWAMP Summary Report for the North Coast Region for Years 2000-2006 (NCRWQCB 2008). | ||||
Data Reference: | Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP). Summary Report for the North Coast Region (RWQCB-1) for years 2000-2006. North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. March 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Per the Basin Plan (NCRWQCB 2007): The Maximum Contaminant Level for aluminum is 1.0 mg/l (1,000 ug/L). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - North Coast Region (Region 1) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from Santa Rosa Creek at Willowside Road (SWAMP Station ID 114SRCWS1). Samples were collected from well-mixed flows in glides or riffles. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected over 5 site visits from October 2004 to June 2005. Site visits corresponded to fall, winter, spring and early summer seasonal conditions. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | There are no known environmental conditions (e.g., seasonality, land use practices, fire events, storms, etc.) that are related to these data. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Quality control was conducted in accordance with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (Puckett 2002). | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version) | ||||
DECISION ID |
25707 |
Region 1 |
Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Ammonia as Nitrogen |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This water body (Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek) has been split into two water bodies for the current Integrated Report cycle: (1) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek and (2) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek.
The data assessed in this decision during the 2010 Integrated Report cycle were collected in both the mainstem of Santa Rosa Creek and tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek. Therefore, these data are now split up according to where they were collected, and are now assessed under one of the two new water bodies listed above. It should also be noted that the pollutant name has been changed for the current Integrated Report cycle from "Ammonia as Nitrogen" to "Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia)". This water body will no longer be used and will be retired after this Integrated Report cycle. For this current Integrated Report cycle, and in the future, please refer to the two new water bodies listed above for data and information pertaining to Santa Rosa Creek and its tributaries. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | Data originally included in this decision are now evaluated under either the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek" water body or the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek" water body depending on where the data were collected. Please see these two new water bodies for decisions on this pollutant. This water body will be retired next Integrated Report cycle. |
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6191 | ||||
Pollutant: | Ammonia as Nitrogen | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Aquatic Life Use: | Fish Migration | Fish Spawning | Preservation of Rare & Endangered Species | Warm Freshwater Habitat | Wildlife Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 5 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 5 total ammonia as nitrogen instantaneous grab sample collected from Santa Rosa Creek exceed the evaluation guideline. The sample concentrations range from 0.07 to 0.48 mg/l. The samples were collected as part of the Russian River First Flush sampling event. Data are summarized by Katznelson et al. (2003). | ||||
Data Reference: | 2002 Russian River First Flush Summary Report. Clean Water Team, Citizen Monitoring Program of the State Water Resources Control Board | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Per the Basin Plan (NCRWQCB 2007): "Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses." | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - North Coast Region (Region 1) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Per the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria (USEPA 2006): The 1-hour average concentration (acute criterion or CMC) of total ammonia nitrogen (in mg N/L) for freshwater where salmonid fish are present, which is not to be exceeded more than once every three years on average, is calculated using the following equation: CMC=0.275/(1+10^(7.204 - pH)) + 39.0/(1+10^(pH - 7.204)). | ||||
Guideline Reference: | National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected from 5 sites in the Santa Rosa Creek Watershed as follows: (1) in Piner Creek at Fulton Road; (2) in Santa Rosa Creek at Fulton Road; (3) at Matanzas Creek at Doyle Park; (4) in Santa Rosa Creek at Yulupa Avenue; and (5) in Santa Rosa Creek at Melita Road. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected on November 7, 2002. At each site, 2 or 3 instantaneous grab samples were collected over half hour increments. The data are averaged for each site. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Samples were collected during the first runoff event of the rainy season. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected in accordance with the study plan and quality control procedures described by Katznelson et al. (2003). | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | 2002 Russian River First Flush Summary Report. Clean Water Team, Citizen Monitoring Program of the State Water Resources Control Board | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 26337 | ||||
Pollutant: | Ammonia as Nitrogen | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Aquatic Life Use: | Fish Migration | Fish Spawning | Preservation of Rare & Endangered Species | Warm Freshwater Habitat | Wildlife Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 5 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 5 ammonia as nitrogen samples collected from Santa Rosa Creek exceed the objective. The samples were collected as part of the Surface Water Ambient Water Monitoring Program (SWAMP). The data are found in the SWAMP Summary Report for the North Coast Region for Years 2000-2006 (NCRWQCB 2008). | ||||
Data Reference: | Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP). Summary Report for the North Coast Region (RWQCB-1) for years 2000-2006. North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. March 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Per the Basin Plan (NCRWQCB 2007): All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - North Coast Region (Region 1) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Per the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria (USEPA 2006): The 1-hour average concentration (acute criterion or CMC) of total ammonia nitrogen (in mg N/L) for freshwater where salmonid fish are present, which is not to be exceeded more than once every three years on average, is calculated using the following equation: CMC=0.275/(1+10^(7.204 - pH)) + 39.0/(1+10^(pH - 7.204)). | ||||
Guideline Reference: | National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from Santa Rosa Creek at Willowside Road (SWAMP Station ID 114SRCWS1). Samples were collected from well-mixed flows in glides or riffles. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected over 5 site visits from October 2004 to June 2005. Site visits corresponded to fall, winter, spring and early summer seasonal conditions. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | There are no known environmental conditions (e.g., seasonality, land use practices, fire events, storms, etc.) that are related to these data. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Quality control was conducted in accordance with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (Puckett 2002). | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version) | ||||
DECISION ID |
23161 |
Region 1 |
Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Arsenic | Cadmium | Chromium (total) | Copper | Lead | Mercury | Nickel | Selenium | Silver | Zinc |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This water body (Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek) has been split into two water bodies for the current Integrated Report cycle: (1) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek and (2) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek.
The data assessed in this decision during the 2010 Integrated Report cycle were collected in the mainstem of Santa Rosa Creek and therefore are now assessed under the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek" water body. This water body will no longer be used and will be retired after this Integrated Report cycle. For this current Integrated Report cycle, and in the future, please refer to the two new water bodies listed above for data and information pertaining to Santa Rosa Creek and its tributaries. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | Data originally included in this decision are now evaluated under the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek" water body. Please see that water body for a decision on this pollutant. This water body will be retired next Integrated Report cycle. |
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 21548 | ||||
Pollutant: | Arsenic | Cadmium | Chromium (total) | Copper | Lead | Mercury | Nickel | Selenium | Silver | Zinc | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 50 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 50 metal samples collected in Santa Rosa Creek exceed the objectives. There were 5 samples collected for each of the 10 metal parameters. The samples were collected as part of the Surface Water Ambient Water Monitoring Program (SWAMP). The data are found in the SWAMP Summary Report for the North Coast Region for Years 2000-2006 (NCRWQCB 2008). | ||||
Data Reference: | Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP). Summary Report for the North Coast Region (RWQCB-1) for years 2000-2006. North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. March 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Per the Basin Plan (NCRWQCB 2007): Arsenic objective is 0.05 mg/L. Cadmium objective is 0.01 mg/L. Chromium objective is 0.05 mg/L. Lead objective is 0.05 mg/L. Mercury objective is 0.002 mg/L. Selenium objective is 0.01 mg/L. Silver objective is 0.05 mg/L. Per 22 CCR 64431: Nickel maximum contaminant level is 0.1 mg/L. Per 22 CCR 64449: Copper secondary maximum contaminant level is 1.0 mg/L. Zinc secondary maximum contaminant level is 5.0 mg/L. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - North Coast Region (Region 1) | ||||
Title 22. Division 4. Chapter 15. Sections 64400 et seq. California Code of Regulations | |||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from Santa Rosa Creek at Willowside Road (SWAMP Station ID 114SRCWS1). Samples were collected from well-mixed flows in glides or riffles. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected over 5 site visits from October 2004 to June 2005. Site visits corresponded to fall, winter, spring and early summer seasonal conditions. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | There are no known environmental conditions (e.g., seasonality, land use practices, fire events, storms, etc.) that are related to these data. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Quality control was conducted in accordance with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (SWAMP 2002). | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version) | ||||
DECISION ID |
24406 |
Region 1 |
Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Chloride |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This water body (Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek) has been split into two water bodies for the current Integrated Report cycle: (1) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek and (2) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek.
The data assessed in this decision during the 2010 Integrated Report cycle were collected in the mainstem of Santa Rosa Creek and therefore are now assessed under the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek" water body. This water body will no longer be used and will be retired after this Integrated Report cycle. For this current Integrated Report cycle, and in the future, please refer to the two new water bodies listed above for data and information pertaining to Santa Rosa Creek and its tributaries. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | Data originally included in this decision are now evaluated under the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek" water body. Please see that water body for a decision on this pollutant. This water body will be retired next Integrated Report cycle. |
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 25452 | ||||
Pollutant: | Chloride | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Not Recorded | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 5 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 5 chloride samples collected in Santa Rosa Creek exceed the evaluation guideline. The samples were collected as part of the Surface Water Ambient Water Monitoring Program (SWAMP). The data are found in the SWAMP Summary Report for the North Coast Region for Years 2000-2006 (NCRWQCB 2008). | ||||
Data Reference: | Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP). Summary Report for the North Coast Region (RWQCB-1) for years 2000-2006. North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. March 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Per the Basin Plan (NCRWQCB 2007): Waters shall not contain taste- or odor-producing substances in concentrations that impart undesirable tastes or odors to fish flesh or other edible products of aquatic origin, or that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - North Coast Region (Region 1) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Per 22 CCR 64449: The recommended Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level for chloride is 250 mg/L. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Title 22. Division 4. Chapter 15. Sections 64400 et seq. California Code of Regulations | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from Santa Rosa Creek at Willowside Road (SWAMP Station ID 114SRCWS1). Samples were collected from well-mixed flows in glides or riffles. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected over 5 site visits from October 2004 to June 2005. Site visits corresponded to fall, winter, spring and early summer seasonal conditions. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | There are no known environmental conditions (e.g., seasonality, land use practices, fire events, storms, etc.) that are related to these data. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Quality control was conducted in accordance with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (SWAMP 2002). | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version) | ||||
DECISION ID |
25172 |
Region 1 |
Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Diazinon |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This water body (Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek) has been split into two water bodies for the current Integrated Report cycle: (1) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek and (2) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek.
The data assessed in this decision during the 2010 Integrated Report cycle were collected in both the mainstem of Santa Rosa Creek and tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek. Therefore, these data are now split up according to where they were collected, and are now assessed under one of the two new water bodies listed above. This water body will no longer be used and will be retired after this Integrated Report cycle. For this current Integrated Report cycle, and in the future, please refer to the two new water bodies listed above for data and information pertaining to Santa Rosa Creek and its tributaries. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | Data originally included in this decision are now evaluated under either the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek" water body or the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek" water body depending on where the data were collected. Please see these two new water bodies for decisions on this pollutant. This water body will be retired next Integrated Report cycle. |
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6197 | ||||
Pollutant: | Diazinon | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Aquatic Life Use: | Fish Migration | Fish Spawning | Preservation of Rare & Endangered Species | Warm Freshwater Habitat | Wildlife Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 5 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | One of the 5 diazinon samples collected from Dutch Bill Creek exceed the evaluation guideline. Concentrations range from non detect to 0.10 ug/l. The samples were collected as part of the Russian River First Flush sampling event. Data are summarized by Katznelson et al. (2003). | ||||
Data Reference: | 2002 Russian River First Flush Summary Report. Clean Water Team, Citizen Monitoring Program of the State Water Resources Control Board | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Per the Basin Plan (NCRWQCB 2007): All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - North Coast Region (Region 1) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Per the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria (USEPA 2006): The 1-hour average maximum concentration criterion for freshwater aquatic life protection is 0.08 ug/l. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected from 5 sites in the Santa Rosa Creek Watershed as follows: (1) in Piner Creek at Fulton Road; (2) in Santa Rosa Creek at Fulton Road; (3) at Matanzas Creek at Doyle Park; (4) in Santa Rosa Creek at Yulupa Avenue; and (5) in Santa Rosa Creek at Melita Road. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected on November 7, 2002. At each site, 2 or 3 instantaneous grab samples were collected over half hour increments. The data are averaged for each site. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Samples were collected during the first runoff event of the rainy season. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected in accordance with the study plan and quality control procedures described by Katznelson et al. (2003). | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | 2002 Russian River First Flush Summary Report. Clean Water Team, Citizen Monitoring Program of the State Water Resources Control Board | ||||
DECISION ID |
25718 |
Region 1 |
Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Nitrate |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This water body (Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek) has been split into two water bodies for the current Integrated Report cycle: (1) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek and (2) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek.
The data assessed in this decision during the 2010 Integrated Report cycle were collected in both the mainstem of Santa Rosa Creek and tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek. Therefore, these data are now split up according to where they were collected, and are now assessed under one of the two new water bodies listed above. This water body will no longer be used and will be retired after this Integrated Report cycle. For this current Integrated Report cycle, and in the future, please refer to the two new water bodies listed above for data and information pertaining to Santa Rosa Creek and its tributaries. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | Data originally included in this decision are now evaluated under either the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek" water body or the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek" water body depending on where the data were collected. Please see these two new water bodies for decisions on this pollutant. This water body will be retired next Integrated Report cycle. |
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6193 | ||||
Pollutant: | Nitrate | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 3 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 3 nitrate as nitrogen samples collected at Santa Rosa Creek exceed the objective. Sample concentrations range from 0.2 to 0.4 mg/l. The samples were collected as part of the Russian River First Flush sampling event. Data are summarized by Katznelson et al. (2003). | ||||
Data Reference: | 2002 Russian River First Flush Summary Report. Clean Water Team, Citizen Monitoring Program of the State Water Resources Control Board | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Per the Basin Plan (NCRWQCB 2007): The water quality objective for nitrate as nitrogen is 45 mg/l. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - North Coast Region (Region 1) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected from 3 sites in the Santa Rosa Creek Watershed as follows: (1) in Piner Creek at Fulton Road; (2) in Santa Rosa Creek at Fulton Road; and (3) at Matanzas Creek at Doyle Park. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected on November 7, 2002. At each site, 2 or 3 instantaneous grab samples were collected over half hour increments. The data are averaged for each site. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Samples were collected during the first runoff event of the rainy season. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected in accordance with the study plan and quality control procedures described by Katznelson et al. (2003). | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | 2002 Russian River First Flush Summary Report. Clean Water Team, Citizen Monitoring Program of the State Water Resources Control Board | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 8996 | ||||
Pollutant: | Nitrate | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 27 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 27 nitrate as nitrogen samples collected in Santa Rosa Creek exceeded the objective. The sample concentrations range from non-detect (detection limits of 0.02 mg/L - 0.04 mg/L) to 0.8 mg/L. These samples were collected by the Community Clean Water Institutes Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Program (CCWI 2005, CCWI 2006, CCWI 2007). | ||||
Data Reference: | Community Clean Water Institute Master Data for 2005. Downloaded from http://ccwi.org/issues/data.htm on August 25, 2008 | ||||
Community Clean Water Institute Master Data for 2006. Downloaded from http://ccwi.org/issues/data.htm on August 25, 2008 | |||||
Community Clean Water Institute Master Data for 2004. Downloaded from http://ccwi.org/issues/data.htm on October 1, 2008 | |||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Per the Basin Plan (NCRWQCB 2007): The water quality objective for nitrate as nitrogen is 45 mg/L. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - North Coast Region (Region 1) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from one location on Santa Rosa Creek at Olive Park along the Prince Memorial Greenway. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected from January 2004 to December 2006. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | There are no known environmental conditions (e.g., seasonality, land use practices, fire events, storms, etc.) that are related to these data. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected in accordance with the "Community Clean Water Institute Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Program Sampling and Analysis Methods" (CCWI 2007). At each site a grab sample was collected using a container on a pole or by a bucket attached to a rope. The samples were then put into sterilized Whirl Pak bags, put into coolers on ice, and brought to the lab for analysis. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Community Clean Water Institute Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Program Sampling and Analysis Methods. Updated April 12, 2007 | ||||
DECISION ID |
25708 |
Region 1 |
Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Oxygen, Dissolved |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This water body (Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek) has been split into two water bodies for the current Integrated Report cycle: (1) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek and (2) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek.
The data assessed in this decision during the 2010 Integrated Report cycle were collected in the mainstem of Santa Rosa Creek and therefore are now assessed under the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek" water body. This water body will no longer be used and will be retired after this Integrated Report cycle. For this current Integrated Report cycle, and in the future, please refer to the two new water bodies listed above for data and information pertaining to Santa Rosa Creek and its tributaries. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | Data originally included in this decision are now evaluated under the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek" water body. Please see that water body for a decision on this pollutant. This water body will be retired next Integrated Report cycle. |
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 8997 | ||||
Pollutant: | Oxygen, Dissolved | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Aquatic Life Use: | Fish Migration | Fish Spawning | Preservation of Rare & Endangered Species | Warm Freshwater Habitat | Wildlife Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 27 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | One of the 27 samples collected in Santa Rosa Creek exceeded the minimum DO water quality objective. The DO values ranged from 5 mg/L to 13.3 mg/L. These samples were collected by the Community Clean Water Institutes Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Program (CCWI 2005, CCWI 2006, CCWI 2007). | ||||
Data Reference: | Community Clean Water Institute Master Data for 2005. Downloaded from http://ccwi.org/issues/data.htm on August 25, 2008 | ||||
Community Clean Water Institute Master Data for 2006. Downloaded from http://ccwi.org/issues/data.htm on August 25, 2008 | |||||
Community Clean Water Institute Master Data for 2004. Downloaded from http://ccwi.org/issues/data.htm on October 1, 2008 | |||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Per the Basin Plan (NCRWQCB 2007): The minimum dissolved oxygen objective is 7.0 mg/L. The 90% lower limit dissolved oxygen objective is 7.5 mg/L. The 50% lower limit dissolved oxygen objective is 10.0 mg/L. The 90% and 50% lower limits represent the 90/50 percentile values for a calendar year. 90% or 50% or more of the values must be greater than or equal to the lower limit. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - North Coast Region (Region 1) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from one location on Santa Rosa Creek at Olive Park along the Prince Memorial Greenway. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The DO samples were collected from January 2004 to December 2006. The DO samples were collected as instantaneous values and do not represent diurnal conditions. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | There are no known environmental conditions (e.g., seasonality, land use practices, fire events, storms, etc.) that are related to these data. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected in accordance with the "Community Clean Water Institute Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Program Sampling and Analysis Methods" (CCWI 2007). | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Community Clean Water Institute Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Program Sampling and Analysis Methods. Updated April 12, 2007 | ||||
DECISION ID |
24787 |
Region 1 |
Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek |
||
Pollutant: | PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This water body (Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek) has been split into two water bodies for the current Integrated Report cycle: (1) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek and (2) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek.
The data assessed in this decision during the 2010 Integrated Report cycle were collected in the mainstem of Santa Rosa Creek and therefore are now assessed under the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek" water body. This water body will no longer be used and will be retired after this Integrated Report cycle. For this current Integrated Report cycle, and in the future, please refer to the two new water bodies listed above for data and information pertaining to Santa Rosa Creek and its tributaries. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | Data originally included in this decision are now evaluated under the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek" water body. Please see that water body for a decision on this pollutant. This water body will be retired next Integrated Report cycle. |
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 25477 | ||||
Pollutant: | PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 250 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 250 polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) analytes collected in Santa Rosa Creek exceed the evaluation guideline. Each of the 5 samples were analyzed for 50 PCB cogeners. The samples were collected as part of the Surface Water Ambient Water Monitoring Program (SWAMP). The data are found in the 5-Year Monitoring Report (NCRWQCB 2008). | ||||
Data Reference: | Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP). Summary Report for the North Coast Region (RWQCB-1) for years 2000-2006. North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. March 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Per the Basin Plan (NCRWQCB 2007, p. 3-4.00): All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - North Coast Region (Region 1) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Per the "Public Health Goal for Water Soluble Polychlorinated Biphenyls Expected to Found in Drinking Water" (OEHHA 2007): The health-protective concentration of water-soluble PCBs in
drinking water associated with a one in one million extra lifetime cancer risk is 0.09 ug/L. |
||||
Guideline Reference: | Public Health Goal for Water Soluble Polychlorinated Biphenyls Expected to Be Found in Drinking Water. Pesticide and Environmental Toxicology Branch, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from Santa Rosa Creek at Willowside Road (SWAMP Station ID 114SRCWS1). Samples were collected from well-mixed flows in glides or riffles. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected over 5 site visits from October 2004 to June 2005. Site visits corresponded to fall, winter, spring and early summer seasonal conditions. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | There are no known environmental conditions (e.g., seasonality, land use practices, fire events, storms, etc.) that are related to these data. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Quality control was conducted in accordance with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (SWAMP 2002). | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version) | ||||
DECISION ID |
18420 |
Region 1 |
Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Phosphate |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This water body (Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek) has been split into two water bodies for the current Integrated Report cycle: (1) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek and (2) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek.
The data assessed in this decision during the 2010 Integrated Report cycle were collected in both the mainstem of Santa Rosa Creek and tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek. Therefore, these data are now split up according to where they were collected, and are now assessed under one of the two new water bodies listed above. This water body will no longer be used and will be retired after this Integrated Report cycle. For this current Integrated Report cycle, and in the future, please refer to the two new water bodies listed above for data and information pertaining to Santa Rosa Creek and its tributaries. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | Data originally included in this decision are now evaluated under either the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek" water body or the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek" water body depending on where the data were collected. Please see these two new water bodies for decisions on this pollutant. This water body will be retired next Integrated Report cycle. |
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 1741 | ||||
Pollutant: | Phosphate | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | At sampling site SRC040 six samples were collected. Values ranged from 0.049 to 0.261 mg/L P (Sandler, 2004). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Basin Plan: Water shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Phosphorus is considered in the narrative objective for biostimulatory substances. The Basin Plan does not set water quality objectives specifically for orthophosphate. There is no applicable guideline for orthophosphate. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Sampling site SRC040 was located at 3rd St., behind Vineyard Hotel, west of Highway 101 along the Prince George Greenway, Santa Rosa. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were taken once a month from February through August 2003, except in May. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Draft QAPP for Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Project for the Community Clean Water Institute. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6192 | ||||
Pollutant: | Phosphorus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Aquatic Life Use: | Fish Migration | Fish Spawning | Preservation of Rare & Endangered Species | Warm Freshwater Habitat | Wildlife Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | It is unknown whether any of the 5 phosphorus samples collected in the Santa Rosa Creek Watershed exceed the objective as there is insufficient information available to determine exceedance. Specifically, the samples cannot be compared to the objective because diel samples for dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, and/or chlorophyll-a are not available. Nutrients, such as phosphorus, alone do not impair beneficial uses or cause non-attainment of the objective. Rather, they cause indirect impacts through algal growth and extreme diel patterns for DO and pH, which then impair uses. Waterbody-specific factors such as riparian cover, flow conditions, and stream channel configuration also affect how nutrients are processed within the stream and play a large role in determining whether or not nuisance algal conditions will prevail. For these reasons, comparing a single nutrient value to the biostimulatory objective is not recommended. Instead, nutrient-related indicator parameters, such as diel measurements of DO, pH, and/or chlorophyll-a, should be evaluated to determine attainment of the objective and protection of beneficial uses. When nutrient-related indicator parameters exceed targets, nutrient concentrations will then be analyzed to determine whether phosphorus should be added to a possible listing under the 303(d) List. The sample concentrations range from 0.13 to 0.44 mg/l. The samples were collected as part of the Russian River First Flush sampling event. Data are summarized by Katznelson et al. (2003). | ||||
Data Reference: | 2002 Russian River First Flush Summary Report. Clean Water Team, Citizen Monitoring Program of the State Water Resources Control Board | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Per the Basin Plan (NCRWQCB 2007): Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance, or that otherwise adversely affect beneficial uses. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - North Coast Region (Region 1) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected from 5 sites in the Santa Rosa Creek Watershed as follows: (1) in Piner Creek at Fulton Road; (2) in Santa Rosa Creek at Fulton Road; (3) at Matanzas Creek at Doyle Park; (4) in Santa Rosa Creek at Yulupa Avenue; and (5) in Santa Rosa Creek at Melita Road. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected on November 7, 2002. At each site, 2 or 3 instantaneous grab samples were collected over half hour increments. The data are averaged for each site. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Samples were collected during the first runoff event of the rainy season. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected in accordance with the study plan and quality control procedures described by Katznelson et al. (2003). | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | 2002 Russian River First Flush Summary Report. Clean Water Team, Citizen Monitoring Program of the State Water Resources Control Board | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 9042 | ||||
Pollutant: | Phosphorus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Not Recorded | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Aquatic Life Use: | Fish Migration | Fish Spawning | Preservation of Rare & Endangered Species | Warm Freshwater Habitat | Wildlife Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | It is unknown whether any of the 27 phosphorus samples collected in Santa Rosa Creek exceed the objective as there is insufficient information available to determine exceedance. Specifically, the samples cannot be compared to the objective because diel samples for dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, and/or chlorophyll-a are not available. Nutrients, such as phosphorus, alone do not impair beneficial uses or cause non-attainment of the objective. Rather, they cause indirect impacts through algal growth and extreme diel patterns for DO and pH, which then impair uses. Waterbody-specific factors such as riparian cover, flow conditions, and stream channel configuration also affect how nutrients are processed within the stream and play a large role in determining whether or not nuisance algal conditions will prevail. For these reasons, comparing a single nutrient value to the biostimulatory objective is not recommended. Instead, nutrient-related indicator parameters, such as diel measurements of DO, pH, and/or chlorophyll-a, should be evaluated to determine attainment of the objective and protection of beneficial uses. When nutrient-related indicator parameters exceed targets, nutrient concentrations will then be analyzed to determine whether phosphorus should be added to a possible listing under the 303(d) List. The sample concentrations range from non-detect (reporting limits of 0.03 mg/L and 0.1 mg/L) to 0.42 mg/L. These samples were collected by the Community Clean Water Institutes Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Program (CCWI 2005, CCWI 2006, and CCWI 2007). | ||||
Data Reference: | Community Clean Water Institute Master Data for 2005. Downloaded from http://ccwi.org/issues/data.htm on August 25, 2008 | ||||
Community Clean Water Institute Master Data for 2006. Downloaded from http://ccwi.org/issues/data.htm on August 25, 2008 | |||||
Community Clean Water Institute Master Data for 2004. Downloaded from http://ccwi.org/issues/data.htm on October 1, 2008 | |||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Per the Basin Plan (NCRWQCB 2007): Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - North Coast Region (Region 1) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from one location on Santa Rosa Creek at Olive Park along the Prince Memorial Greenway. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected from January 2004 to December 2006. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | There are no known environmental conditions (e.g., seasonality, land use practices, fire events, storms, etc.) that are related to these data. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected in accordance with the "Community Clean Water Institute Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Program Sampling and Analysis Methods" (CCWI 2007). | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Community Clean Water Institute Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Program Sampling and Analysis Methods. Updated April 12, 2007 | ||||
DECISION ID |
22548 |
Region 1 |
Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Specific Conductivity |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This water body (Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek) has been split into two water bodies for the current Integrated Report cycle: (1) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek and (2) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek.
The data assessed in this decision during the 2010 Integrated Report cycle were collected in the mainstem of Santa Rosa Creek and therefore are now assessed under the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek" water body. This water body will no longer be used and will be retired after this Integrated Report cycle. For this current Integrated Report cycle, and in the future, please refer to the two new water bodies listed above for data and information pertaining to Santa Rosa Creek and its tributaries. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | Data originally included in this decision are now evaluated under the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek" water body. Please see that water body for a decision on this pollutant. This water body will be retired next Integrated Report cycle. |
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 21329 | ||||
Pollutant: | Specific Conductivity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 5 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 5 specific conductivity grab samples collected from Santa Rosa Creek exceed the objective. The samples were collected as part of the Surface Water Ambient Water Monitoring Program (SWAMP). The data are found in the SWAMP Summary Report for the North Coast Region for Years 2000-2006 (NCRWQCB 2008). | ||||
Data Reference: | Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP). Summary Report for the North Coast Region (RWQCB-1) for years 2000-2006. North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. March 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Per 22 CCR 64449: The recommended secondary Maximum Content Level (MCL) is 900 uS/cm. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Title 22. Division 4. Chapter 15. Sections 64400 et seq. California Code of Regulations | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from Santa Rosa Creek at Willowside Road (SWAMP Station ID 114SRCWS1). Samples were collected from well-mixed flows in glides or riffles. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected over 5 site visits from October 2004 to June 2005. Site visits corresponded to fall, winter, spring and early summer seasonal conditions. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | There are no known environmental conditions (e.g., seasonality, land use practices, fire events, storms, etc.) that are related to these data. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Quality control was conducted in accordance with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (Puckett 2002). | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version) | ||||
DECISION ID |
24451 |
Region 1 |
Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Sulfates |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This water body (Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek) has been split into two water bodies for the current Integrated Report cycle: (1) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek and (2) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek.
The data assessed in this decision during the 2010 Integrated Report cycle were collected in the mainstem of Santa Rosa Creek and therefore are now assessed under the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek" water body. This water body will no longer be used and will be retired after this Integrated Report cycle. For this current Integrated Report cycle, and in the future, please refer to the two new water bodies listed above for data and information pertaining to Santa Rosa Creek and its tributaries. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | Data originally included in this decision are now evaluated under the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek" water body. Please see that water body for a decision on this pollutant. This water body will be retired next Integrated Report cycle. |
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 25560 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sulfates | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Not Recorded | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 5 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 5 sulfate samples collected in Santa Rosa Creek exceed the evaluation guideline. The samples were collected as part of the Surface Water Ambient Water Monitoring Program (SWAMP). The data are found in the 5-Year Monitoring Report (NCRWQCB 2008). | ||||
Data Reference: | Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP). Summary Report for the North Coast Region (RWQCB-1) for years 2000-2006. North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. March 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Per the Basin Plan (NCRWQCB 2007, p. 3-3.00): Waters shall not contain taste- or odor-producing substances in concentrations that impart undesirable tastes or odors to fish flesh or other edible products of aquatic origin, or that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - North Coast Region (Region 1) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Per 22 CCR 64449 (Table 64449-B): The recommended secondary maximum contaminant level for sulfate is 250 mg/L. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Title 22. Division 4. Chapter 15. Sections 64400 et seq. California Code of Regulations | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from Santa Rosa Creek at Willowside Road (SWAMP Station ID 114SRCWS1). Samples were collected from well-mixed flows in glides or riffles. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected over 5 site visits from October 2004 to June 2005. Site visits corresponded to fall, winter, spring and early summer seasonal conditions. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | There are no known environmental conditions (e.g., seasonality, land use practices, fire events, storms, etc.) that are related to these data. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Quality control was conducted in accordance with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (SWAMP 2002). | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version) | ||||
DECISION ID |
18192 |
Region 1 |
Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek |
||
Pollutant: | pH |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This water body (Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa Creek) has been split into two water bodies for the current Integrated Report cycle: (1) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek and (2) Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek.
The data assessed in this decision during the 2010 Integrated Report cycle were collected in both the mainstem of Santa Rosa Creek and tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek. Therefore, these data are now split up according to where they were collected, and are now assessed under one of the two new water bodies listed above. This water body will no longer be used and will be retired after this Integrated Report cycle. For this current Integrated Report cycle, and in the future, please refer to the two new water bodies listed above for data and information pertaining to Santa Rosa Creek and its tributaries. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | Data originally included in this decision are now evaluated under either the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, mainstem Santa Rosa Creek" water body or the "Russian River HU, Middle Russian River HA, Santa Rosa HSA, tributaries to Santa Rosa Creek" water body depending on where the data were collected. Please see these two new water bodies for decisions on this pollutant. This water body will be retired next Integrated Report cycle. |
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 8998 | ||||
Pollutant: | pH | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Aquatic Life Use: | Fish Migration | Fish Spawning | Preservation of Rare & Endangered Species | Warm Freshwater Habitat | Wildlife Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 33 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 2 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Two of the 33 samples for pH collected in Santa Rosa Creek exceeded the pH water quality objective. The pH values ranged from 7.0 to 8.7. These samples were collected by the Community Clean Water Institutes Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Program (CCWI 2005, CCWI 2006, CCWI 2007). | ||||
Data Reference: | Community Clean Water Institute Master Data for 2005. Downloaded from http://ccwi.org/issues/data.htm on August 25, 2008 | ||||
Community Clean Water Institute Master Data for 2006. Downloaded from http://ccwi.org/issues/data.htm on August 25, 2008 | |||||
Community Clean Water Institute Master Data for 2004. Downloaded from http://ccwi.org/issues/data.htm on October 1, 2008 | |||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Per the Basin Plan (NCRWQCB 2007): The maximum pH objective is 8.5. The minimum pH objective is 6.5. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - North Coast Region (Region 1) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from one location on Santa Rosa Creek at Olive Park along the Prince Memorial Greenway. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The pH samples were collected during 33 site visits from January 2004 to December 2006. The pH samples were collected as instantaneous measurements and do not represent diurnal conditions. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | There are no known environmental conditions (e.g., seasonality, land use practices, fire events, storms, etc.) that are related to these data. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected in accordance with the "Community Clean Water Institute Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Program Sampling and Analysis Methods" (CCWI 2007). | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Community Clean Water Institute Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Program Sampling and Analysis Methods. Updated April 12, 2007 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6189 | ||||
Pollutant: | pH | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Aquatic Life Use: | Fish Migration | Fish Spawning | Preservation of Rare & Endangered Species | Warm Freshwater Habitat | Wildlife Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 5 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 5 pH samples collected in Santa Rosa Creek exceed the water quality objective. Sample concentrations range from a pH of 6.5 to 7.5. The samples were collected as part of the Russian River First Flush sampling event. Data are summarized by Katznelson et al. (2003). | ||||
Data Reference: | 2002 Russian River First Flush Summary Report. Clean Water Team, Citizen Monitoring Program of the State Water Resources Control Board | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Per the Basin Plan (NCRWQCB 2007): The maximum pH objective is 8.5. The minimum pH objective is 6.5. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - North Coast Region (Region 1) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected from 5 sites in the Santa Rosa Creek Watershed as follows: (1) in Piner Creek at Fulton Road; (2) in Santa Rosa Creek at Fulton Road; (3) at Matanzas Creek at Doyle Park; (4) in Santa Rosa Creek at Yulupa Avenue; and (5) in Santa Rosa Creek at Melita Road. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected on November 7, 2002. At each site, 2 or 3 instantaneous grab samples were collected over half hour increments. The data are averaged for each site. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Samples were collected during the first runoff event of the rainy season. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected in accordance with the study plan and quality control procedures described by Katznelson et al. (2003). | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | 2002 Russian River First Flush Summary Report. Clean Water Team, Citizen Monitoring Program of the State Water Resources Control Board | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 1740 | ||||
Pollutant: | pH | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Not Recorded | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 6 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 3 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Samples were taken at one location (Site SRC040) for Santa Rosa Creek. Of the 6 samples taken, 3 exceeded the upper pH limit of 8.5. With values at 8.8, 8.8 and 9.0 (Sandler, 2004). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Basin Plan: pH for Russian River (Table 3.1) shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. Changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.2 units in waters with designated marine (MAR) or saline (SAL) beneficial uses nor 0.5 units within the range specified above in fresh waters with designated COLD or WARM beneficial uses. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Sampling site was located at 3rd St., behind Vineyard Hotel, west of Highway 101 along the Prince George Greenway, Santa Rosa. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were taken once a month from February through August 2003, except in May. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Draft QAPP for Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Project for the Community Clean Water Institute. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||