Pollutant: |
Mercury |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Region 2 data was not included in the 2012 Integrated Report so all decisions are carried over from the 2010 listing cycle. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
No new data were assessed for 2012. The decision has not changed. |
|
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 19471, Mercury
|
Region 2 |
Napa River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
1823 |
|
Pollutant: |
Mercury |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Not Specified |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Six samples were collected with no exceedances (Napa Sanitation District, 2006). |
Data Reference: |
Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Basin Plan Objective: 0.0250 ug/l |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Two stations were sampled: Napa River at Calistoga and Napa River at Napa. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected in April, July and October of 2002. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
QA Info Missing |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 19471, Mercury
|
Region 2 |
Napa River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
1822 |
|
Pollutant: |
Mercury |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Tissue |
Matrix: |
Tissue |
Fraction: |
Fish fillet |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Fish tissue analysis |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
One out of 2 samples exceeded. One filet composite sample of bluegill (1995) and two individual samples of brown bullhead (1995) and Sacramento pike minnow (1997) were collected. These values were averaged. The 1995 samples taken near Elm Street exceeded the guideline. The 1997 pike minnow taken near the J.F.K. boat ramp did not exceed (TSMP, 2002). |
Data Reference: |
Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
San Francisco Bay RWQCB Basin Plan: Many pollutants can accumulate on particles, in sediment, or bioaccumulate in fish and other aquatic organisms. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Mercury 0.3 ug/g (OEHHA Screening Value) (Brodberg and Pollock, 1999). |
Guideline Reference: |
Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Two stations were sampled: in Calistoga at Elm Street and 1/2 mile upstream from the J.F.K. Park boat ramp. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected in 1995 and 1997. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Toxic Substances Monitoring Program 1994-95 Data Report. Environmental Chemistry Quality Assurance and Data Report for the Toxic Substances Monitoring Program, 1996 to 2000. Department of Fish and Game. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Nutrients |
Final Listing Decision: |
List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Sources: |
Source Unknown |
Expected TMDL Completion Date: |
2010 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Region 2 data was not included in the 2012 Integrated Report so all decisions are carried over from the 2010 listing cycle. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
No new data were assessed for 2012. The decision has not changed. |
|
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 19882, Nutrients
|
Region 2 |
Napa River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
3768 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nutrients |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Not Specified |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. |
Data Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Unspecified |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Unspecified |
Guideline Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Unspecified |
Temporal Representation: |
Unspecified |
Environmental Conditions: |
Unspecified |
QAPP Information: |
Unspecified |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Sedimentation/Siltation |
Final Listing Decision: |
List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2010) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Sources: |
Source Unknown |
Expected TMDL Completion Date: |
2008 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Region 2 data was not included in the 2012 Integrated Report so all decisions are carried over from the 2010 listing cycle. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
No new data were assessed for 2012. The decision has not changed. |
|
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 30451, Sedimentation/Siltation
|
Region 2 |
Napa River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
3769 |
|
Pollutant: |
Sedimentation/Siltation |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Not Specified |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. |
Data Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Unspecified |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Unspecified |
Guideline Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Unspecified |
Temporal Representation: |
Unspecified |
Environmental Conditions: |
Unspecified |
QAPP Information: |
Unspecified |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Pathogens |
Final Listing Decision: |
List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)(2010) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Sources: |
Source Unknown |
TMDL Name: |
Napa River Pathogens |
TMDL Project Code: |
60 |
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA: |
02/29/2008 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Region 2 data was not included in the 2012 Integrated Report so all decisions are carried over from the 2010 listing cycle. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Water Board staff conclude that the water body should be placed in the Water Quality Limited Segments Being Addressed category of the section 303(d) list because a TMDL has been approved by USEPA and an approved implementation plan is in place. |
|
State Board Staff Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 20984, Pathogens
|
Region 2 |
Napa River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
1824 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pathogens |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Not Specified |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. |
Data Reference: |
Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
|
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
|
Temporal Representation: |
|
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
QA Info Missing |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|