Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 24872, Escherichia coli (E. coli)
|
Region 3 |
Esperanza Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
13679 |
|
Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Central Coast Watershed Studies (R3_CCOWS) data for Esperanza Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Escherichia coli. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCoWS (Central Coast Watershed Studies) Water Quality Data |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: Fecal coliform concentration, based on a minimum of not less than five samples for any 30-day period, shall not exceed a log mean of 2000/100 ml, nor shall more than ten percent of samples collected during any 30-day period exceed 4000/100 ml. E. coli is a fecal coliform. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Esperanza Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Old Stage Rd] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/31/2002-8/13/2002. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data quality is good and Standard Operating Procedures are well documented in QAPP. However, data documentation is poor and replicate samples and other quality assurance measurements are not consistently documented in this data set. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 24872, Escherichia coli (E. coli)
|
Region 3 |
Esperanza Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
13678 |
|
Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Central Coast Watershed Studies (R3_CCOWS) data for Esperanza Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Escherichia coli. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCoWS (Central Coast Watershed Studies) Water Quality Data |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
USEPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria -1986. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria - 1986. EPA440/5-84-002 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Single sample maximum allowable density for E. coli in freshwater is 235 MPN/100mL (as stated in Table 4, page 15) |
Guideline Reference: |
Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria - 1986. EPA440/5-84-002 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Esperanza Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Old Stage Rd] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/31/2002-8/13/2002. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data quality is good and Standard Operating Procedures are well documented in QAPP. However, data documentation is poor and replicate samples and other quality assurance measurements are not consistently documented in this data set. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 24862, Fecal Coliform
|
Region 3 |
Esperanza Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
13778 |
|
Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
4 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Central Coast Watershed Studies (R3_CCOWS) data for Esperanza Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for Coliform, Fecal (400MPN/100mL). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCoWS (Central Coast Watershed Studies) Water Quality Data |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: Fecal coliform concentration, based on a minimum of not less than five samples for any 30-day period, shall not exceed a log mean of 2000/100 ml, nor shall more than ten percent of samples collected during any 30-day period exceed 4000/100 ml. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Esperanza Creek was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ Between Hwy 101 & Railway, South of Esperanza Rd, Old Stage Rd] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 8/22/2001-8/13/2002. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data quality is good and Standard Operating Procedures are well documented in QAPP. However, data documentation is poor and replicate samples and other quality assurance measurements are not consistently documented in this data set. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 24862, Fecal Coliform
|
Region 3 |
Esperanza Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
13777 |
|
Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
4 |
Number of Exceedances: |
3 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Central Coast Watershed Studies (R3_CCOWS) data for Esperanza Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for Coliform, Fecal (400 MPN/100mL). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCoWS (Central Coast Watershed Studies) Water Quality Data |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for water contact recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: Fecal coliform concentration, based on a minimum of not less than five samples for any 30-day period, shall not exceed a log mean of 200 MPN/100 ml, nor shall more than ten percent of total samples during any 30-day period exceed 400 MPN/100 ml. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Esperanza Creek was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ Between Hwy 101 & Railway, South of Esperanza Rd, Old Stage Rd] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 8/22/2001-8/13/2002. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data quality is good and Standard Operating Procedures are well documented in QAPP. However, data documentation is poor and replicate samples and other quality assurance measurements are not consistently documented in this data set. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 25520, Turbidity
|
Region 3 |
Esperanza Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
13752 |
|
Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Central Coast Watershed Studies (R3_CCOWS) data for Esperanza Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCoWS (Central Coast Watershed Studies) Water Quality Data |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTU's or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Esperanza Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Between Hwy 101 & Railway, South of Esperanza Rd] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 8/22/2001-9/27/2001. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data quality is good and Standard Operating Procedures are well documented in QAPP. However, data documentation is poor and replicate samples and other quality assurance measurements are not consistently documented in this data set. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 25520, Turbidity
|
Region 3 |
Esperanza Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
13753 |
|
Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Central Coast Watershed Studies (R3_CCOWS) data for Esperanza Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCoWS (Central Coast Watershed Studies) Water Quality Data |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTU's or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Esperanza Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Between Hwy 101 & Railway, South of Esperanza Rd] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 8/22/2001-9/27/2001. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data quality is good and Standard Operating Procedures are well documented in QAPP. However, data documentation is poor and replicate samples and other quality assurance measurements are not consistently documented in this data set. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 25558, pH
|
Region 3 |
Esperanza Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
13874 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Central Coast Watershed Studies (R3_CCOWS) data for Esperanza Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCoWS (Central Coast Watershed Studies) Water Quality Data |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for water contact recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Esperanza Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Between Hwy 101 & Railway, South of Esperanza Rd] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 8/22/2001-9/27/2001. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data quality is good and Standard Operating Procedures are well documented in QAPP. However, data documentation is poor and replicate samples and other quality assurance measurements are not consistently documented in this data set. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 25558, pH
|
Region 3 |
Esperanza Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
13873 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Central Coast Watershed Studies (R3_CCOWS) data for Esperanza Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCoWS (Central Coast Watershed Studies) Water Quality Data |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Section II.A.2. Municipal and Domestic Supply Objectives, Section II.A.2.a states the following: The pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Esperanza Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Between Hwy 101 & Railway, South of Esperanza Rd] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 8/22/2001-9/27/2001. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data quality is good and Standard Operating Procedures are well documented in QAPP. However, data documentation is poor and replicate samples and other quality assurance measurements are not consistently documented in this data set. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 25558, pH
|
Region 3 |
Esperanza Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
13889 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Central Coast Watershed Studies (R3_CCOWS) data for Esperanza Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCoWS (Central Coast Watershed Studies) Water Quality Data |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Esperanza Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Between Hwy 101 & Railway, South of Esperanza Rd] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 8/22/2001-9/27/2001. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data quality is good and Standard Operating Procedures are well documented in QAPP. However, data documentation is poor and replicate samples and other quality assurance measurements are not consistently documented in this data set. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 25558, pH
|
Region 3 |
Esperanza Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
13872 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Central Coast Watershed Studies (R3_CCOWS) data for Esperanza Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCoWS (Central Coast Watershed Studies) Water Quality Data |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Esperanza Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Between Hwy 101 & Railway, South of Esperanza Rd] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 8/22/2001-9/27/2001. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data quality is good and Standard Operating Procedures are well documented in QAPP. However, data documentation is poor and replicate samples and other quality assurance measurements are not consistently documented in this data set. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 25558, pH
|
Region 3 |
Esperanza Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
13890 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Central Coast Watershed Studies (R3_CCOWS) data for Esperanza Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCoWS (Central Coast Watershed Studies) Water Quality Data |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Esperanza Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Between Hwy 101 & Railway, South of Esperanza Rd] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 8/22/2001-9/27/2001. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data quality is good and Standard Operating Procedures are well documented in QAPP. However, data documentation is poor and replicate samples and other quality assurance measurements are not consistently documented in this data set. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 25509, Nitrate
|
Region 3 |
Esperanza Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
28099 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
3 |
Number of Exceedances: |
3 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Data for this assessment unit was collected by one monitoring project: Central Coast Watershed Studies (R3_CCOWS) |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCoWS (Central Coast Watershed Studies) Water Quality Data |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (general objective for biostimulatory substances, Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Technical approach to develop nutrient numeric endpoints for California, Tetra Tech, June 2006. The Central Coast Region numeric target for maximum nitrate concentration is based on the Tetra Tech NNE (Nutrient Numeric Endpoint) Model and CCAMP data for 193 sites, monitored monthly for at least 1 year between January 1998 and December 2006. The model numeric target for aquatic life habitats in the Central Coast Region is 1.0 mg/L Nitrate as N. |
Guideline Reference: |
Technical Approach to Develop Nutrient Numeric Endpoints for California. U.S. EPA Region IX. State Water Resources Control Board. 68-C-02-108-To-111 |
|
Technical Paper - Interpreting Narrative Objectives for Biostimulatory Substances Using the Technical Approach for Developing California Nutrient Numeric Endpoints. Central Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Esperanza Creek was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ Between Hwy 101 & Railway, South of Esperanza Rd, Old Stage Rd] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 8/22/2001-5/23/2002. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data quality is good and Standard Operating Procedures are well documented in QAPP. However, data documentation is poor and replicate samples and other quality assurance measurements are not consistently documented in this data set. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 25509, Nitrate
|
Region 3 |
Esperanza Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
28100 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
3 |
Number of Exceedances: |
3 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Data for this assessment unit was collected by one monitoring project: Central Coast Watershed Studies (R3_CCOWS) |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCoWS (Central Coast Watershed Studies) Water Quality Data |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (general objective for biostimulatory substances, Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Technical approach to develop nutrient numeric endpoints for California, Tetra Tech, June 2006. The Central Coast Region numeric target for maximum nitrate concentration is based on the Tetra Tech NNE (Nutrient Numeric Endpoint) Model and CCAMP data for 193 sites, monitored monthly for at least 1 year between January 1998 and December 2006. The model numeric target for aquatic life habitats in the Central Coast Region is 1.0 mg/L Nitrate as N. |
Guideline Reference: |
Technical Approach to Develop Nutrient Numeric Endpoints for California. U.S. EPA Region IX. State Water Resources Control Board. 68-C-02-108-To-111 |
|
Technical Paper - Interpreting Narrative Objectives for Biostimulatory Substances Using the Technical Approach for Developing California Nutrient Numeric Endpoints. Central Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Esperanza Creek was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ Between Hwy 101 & Railway, South of Esperanza Rd, Old Stage Rd] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 8/22/2001-5/23/2002. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data quality is good and Standard Operating Procedures are well documented in QAPP. However, data documentation is poor and replicate samples and other quality assurance measurements are not consistently documented in this data set. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 25509, Nitrate
|
Region 3 |
Esperanza Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
13783 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
3 |
Number of Exceedances: |
3 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Central Coast Watershed Studies (R3_CCOWS) data for Esperanza Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 3 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate as N. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCoWS (Central Coast Watershed Studies) Water Quality Data |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin Objective for municipal and domestic supply uses of inland surface waters (Section II.A.2) states the following: waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the limits specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Article 4, Chapter 15, Section 64435, Tables 2 and 3 as listed in Table 3-2. The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 3-2 (inorganic and fluoride concentrations not to be exceeded in domestic or municipal supply) for nitrate is 10.0 mg/L (NO3 as N). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Title 22, Division 4, Ch. 15, Article 4, Section 64431, Table 64431-A |
|
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Esperanza Creek was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ Between Hwy 101 & Railway, South of Esperanza Rd, Old Stage Rd] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 8/22/2001-5/23/2002. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data quality is good and Standard Operating Procedures are well documented in QAPP. However, data documentation is poor and replicate samples and other quality assurance measurements are not consistently documented in this data set. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|