Water Body Name: | Huntington Harbour |
Water Body ID: | CAB8011100019990323095254 |
Water Body Type: | Bay & Harbor |
DECISION ID |
69142 |
Region 8 |
Huntington Harbour |
||
Pollutant: | Dieldrin |
Final Listing Decision: | Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Reason for Delisting: | Applicable WQS attained; reason for recovery unspecified |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | There was no new data considered in the 2014 Listing Cycle, this previously made decision will carryover. The following description applies to an earlier Listing Cycle.
This pollutant is being considered for removal from the section 303(d) list under section 4.6 and 4.11 of the Listing Policy. Under section 4.6 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the sediment samples exceeds the sediment quality guidelines. There is sediment toxicity documented in this water body, however, it does not appear to be linked to this pollutant. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The sediment quality guideline used complies with the requirements of section 6.1.3 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 3. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 4. None of 60 samples exceeded the sediment guideline and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. 5. There is no fish tissue data in the administrative record for Huntington Harbour. Based on section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, this is sufficient to delist this water body-pollutant combination from the 303(d) list. 6. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current. The decision has not changed. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 251 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 60 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 47 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Forty-seven of 60 samples exceeded the 90 percent of the minimum significant difference for test species Eohaustorius estuarius. Twenty of 30 samples exhibited toxicity in the dry season (8/7/01 and 8/8/01), and 27 of 30 exhibited toxicity in the wet season (2/24/03) (Phillips et al., 1998). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: "The concentration of toxic pollutants in the water column, sediment or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial use." | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at 32 stations (no data were included for stations 40, 45, 48, 61, and 67). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on 8/7/01, 8/8/01 and 2/24/03. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Samples were collected during dry (8/7/01, 8/8/01) and wet season (2/24/03). | ||||
QAPP Information: | SARQWCB followed the Bight 1998 QAPP developed by SCCWRP. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 253 | ||||
Pollutant: | Dieldrin | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 60 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Chemical monitoring of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of 60 samples exceeded the ERM for dieldrin (Santa Ana RWQCB, 2003b). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentration of toxic substance in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (Santa Ana RWQCB, 1995a). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The ERM for dieldrin is 8 ug/kg (ppb) (Long et al., 1990). | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at stations 36 though 72 in Huntington Harbor. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on 08/08/2001 and on 02/27/2003. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Samples were collected during the dry season (August) and wet season (February). | ||||
QAPP Information: | SARWQCB followed the Bight 1998 QAPP developed by SCCWRP.Quality control data was presented. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
78524 |
Region 8 |
Huntington Harbour |
||
Pollutant: | Nickel |
Final Listing Decision: | Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Reason for Delisting: | Applicable WQS attained; reason for recovery unspecified |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for removal from the CWA section 303(d) List under section 4.1 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 45 samples exceeded the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification for removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of the 45 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are not being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 4413 | ||||
Pollutant: | Nickel | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Not Recorded | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Unspecified | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Unspecified | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Unspecified | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Unspecified | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Unspecified | ||||
QAPP Information: | Unspecified | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81602 | ||||
Pollutant: | Nickel | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 45 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 45 samples exceeded the water quality objective for nickel. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentrations of toxic pollutants in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations (4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater for nickel at 8.2 ug/L. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from within Huntington Harbor at three samples stations: Harbor Entrance (HUNBCC), Sunset Aquatic Park (HUNCRB), and Warner Avenue (HUNWAR). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected quarterly starting in Fall of 2006 through June of 2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected and analyzed in accordance with the signed and certified, Quality Assurance Management Plan for the Orange County Stormwater Program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
68882 |
Region 8 |
Huntington Harbour |
||
Pollutant: | Copper |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Sources: | A Source Unknown |
Expected TMDL Completion Date: | 2019 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for removal from the CWA section 303(d) List under section 4.1 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess pollutant. Sixteen out of 45 water samples exceed the CTR. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Sixteen out of 45 water samples exceed the CTR and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81572 | ||||
Pollutant: | Copper | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 45 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 16 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Sixteen (16) of the 45 samples exceeded the water quality objective for copper. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentrations of toxic pollutants in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations (4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater for copper at 3.1 ug/L. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from within Huntington Harbor at three samples stations: Harbor Entrance (HUNBCC), Sunset Aquatic Park (HUNCRB), and Warner Avenue (HUNWAR). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected quarterly starting in Fall of 2006 through June of 2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected and analyzed in accordance with the signed and certified, Quality Assurance Management Plan for the Orange County Stormwater Program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 4412 | ||||
Pollutant: | Copper | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Not Recorded | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Unspecified | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Unspecified | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Unspecified | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Unspecified | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Unspecified | ||||
QAPP Information: | Unspecified | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
97909 |
Region 8 |
Huntington Harbour |
||
Pollutant: | Indicator Bacteria |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Sources: | A Source Unknown |
Expected TMDL Completion Date: | 2019 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for removal from the CWA section 303(d) List under section 4.3 of the Listing Policy. Under section 4.3 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
Eighty Eight (88) lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Eight hundred and Fifty Two (852) of 6,867 samples exceed the Enterococcus Geomean Objective. Thirty Nine (39) of 393 samples exceed the Enterococcus Single Sample Objective. Three hundred and Ninety Two (392) of 8,408 samples exceed the Fecal Coliform Geomean Objective. Twenty Three (23) of 378 samples exceed the Fecal Coliform Single Sample Objective. Three hundred and Twenty Seven (327) of 13,481 samples exceed the Total Coliform Geomean Objective. Seventeen (17) of 287 samples exceed the Total Coliform Single Sample Objective. However at 11th Street Station, Anderson Street Station, Clubhouse Station and Sunset Aquatic Park Station, 127 of 539 samples, 87 of 514 samples, 117 of 554 samples, and 158 of 541 samples, respectively, exceed the Enterococcus Geomean Objective Sample Objective and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.2 of the Listing Policy. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Eight hundred and Fifty Two (852) of the 6,867 samples exceed the Enterococcus Geomean Objective, 392 of the 8,408 samples exceed the Fecal Coliform Geomean Objective, 327 of the 13,481 samples exceed the Total Coliform Geomean, and this does not exceed the frequency listed in table 4.2 4. Thirty Nine (39) of the 393 samples exceed the Enterococcus Single Sample Objective, 23 of the 378 samples exceed the Fecal Coliform Single Sample Objective, 17 of the 287 samples exceed the Total Coliform Single Sample, and this does not exceed the frequency listed in table 4.2 5.At 4 stations, 11th Street Station, Anderson Street Station, Clubhouse Station and Sunset Aquatic Park Station, 127 of 539 samples, 87 of 514 samples, 117 of 554 samples, and 158 of 541 samples, respectively, exceed the Enterococcus Geomean Objective Sample Objective and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.2 of the Listing Policy.. 6. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81590 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 12 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Zero of the 12 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for fecal coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 400 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at MOTHERS BEACH. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81591 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 14 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Zero of the 14 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for fecal coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 400 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at SEA GATE. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81593 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 12 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Zero of the 12 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for fecal coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 400 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at CLUBHOUSE. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81594 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 12 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Zero of the 12 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for fecal coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 400 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at CORAL CAY. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6072 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1055 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 25 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 1055 samples collected, 25 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Total Coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 1055 samples were collected at the Harbour Channel station located in Huntington Harbour | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 1055 samples were collected between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_922_B. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 7016 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1076 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 30 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 1076 samples collected, 30 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | |||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Total Coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 1076 samples were collected at the Sunset Aquatic Park station located in Huntington Harbour | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 1076 samples were collected in March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_922_B. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6994 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 806 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 13 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 806 samples collected, 13 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Total Coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 ml when | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 806 samples were collected at the Mothers Beach station located in Huntington Harbour | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 806 samples were collected between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_922_B. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 7019 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1138 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 11 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 1138 samples collected, 11 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Total Coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 1138 samples were collected at the Trinidad Lane station located in Huntington Harbour | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 1138 samples were collected March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_922_B. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6811 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1138 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 20 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 1138 samples collected, 20 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | |||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Total Coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 1138 samples were collected at the Humboldt Beach station located in Huntington Harbour | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 1138 samples were collected between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_922_B. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 7014 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 129 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 129 samples collected, 0 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Total Coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 129 samples were collected at the Sea Gate station located in Huntington Harbour | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 129 samples were collected between April 2004 and December 2006 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81607 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 13 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Zero of the 13 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for total coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 1000 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at 11TH STREET BEACH. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81608 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 12 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Zero of the 12 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for total coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 1000 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at MOTHERS BEACH. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6066 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 427 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 427 samples collected, 0 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Total Coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 ml when | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 427 samples were collected at the Coral Clay station located in Huntington Harbour | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 427 samples were collected between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_922_B. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6069 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1134 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 11 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 1134 samples collected, 11 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Total Coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 1134 samples were collected at the Davenport Beach station located in Huntington Harbour | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 1134 samples were collected March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_922_B. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6059 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1002 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 9 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 1002 samples collected, 9 exceeded the objectives listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Total Coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 1002 samples were collected at the Bolsa Chica station located in Huntington Harbour | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 1002 samples were collected between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_922_B. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6046 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1170 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 29 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 1170 samples collected, 29 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Total Coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 1170 samples were collected at the 11th Street Beach station located in Huntington Harbour | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 1170 samples were collected between March 1999and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_922_B. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81616 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 13 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Zero of the 13 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for total coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 1000 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at TRINIDAD LANE. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81610 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 12 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Zero of the 12 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for total coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 1000 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at ADMIRALTY DRIVE. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81611 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 12 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Zero of the 12 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for total coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 1000 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at CLUBHOUSE. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81612 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 12 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Zero of the 12 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for total coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 1000 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at Davenport Beach. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81613 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 15 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Zero of the 15 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for total coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 1000 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at HARBOUR CHANNEL. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81614 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 13 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Zero of the 13 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for total coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 1000 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at HUMBOLDT BEACH. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81615 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 14 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Zero of the 14 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for total coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 1000 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at SEA GATE. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81580 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 13 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Zero of the 13 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for enterococcus states that the density shall not exceed 35 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at CLUBHOUSE. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81575 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 14 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | One of the 14 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for enterococcus states that the density shall not exceed 35 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at 11TH STREET BEACH. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81577 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 42 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 12 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Twelve of the forty-two samples exceeded the enterococcus objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The single sample enterococcus concentration shall not exceed more than 104/100ml. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2006. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected from Huntington Harbour sites, Bolsa Chica Channel Mouth, Christiana Bay, and Warner Avenue. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected from 2006 to 2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected and analyzed under the Quality Assurance Management Plan for The Orange County Stormwater Program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81578 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 7 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | (VOL.) Chem./phys. monitoring data by quality-assured volunteer program | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | One of the seven samples exceeded the enterococcus objective. The data was collected by volunteer monitoring groups during three years. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for bacteria in various waterbodies, Feb. 2005-May 2007 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The single sample entercoccus concentration shall not exceed more than 104/100ml. Calidornia Ocean Plan 2006. (Basin Plan Region 8) | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The data was collected from Peter's Landing - estuary and Huntington Harbor - estuary. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The data was collected in November 2003, February, May and July 2004, and May 2007. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The data was collected by volunteer monitoring groups under The Southern California Marine Institute Volunteer Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6990 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 100 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 10 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 100 samples collected, 10 exceed the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Enterococcus <104MPN/100mL | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a single sample maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Enterococcus density shall not exceed 104 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 100 samples were collected at the Mothers Beach station located in Huntington Harbour. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 100 samples were collected in 2004 on the days of April 14, April 21, April 28, May 5, May 12, May 19, May 26, June 3, June 9, June 21, June 30, July 8, July 12, August 25, September 1, September 9, September 15, November 17, November 2, December 1, December 7, December 15, and December 22; in 2005 on the days of April 20, April 27, May 11, May 17, June 22, July 7, July 20, August 3, August 10, September 2, September 8, September 13, September 21, September 26, October 5, October 13, October 19, October 26, November 2, November 9, November 16, November 21, November 28, December 7, December 13, December 21, and December 29; in 2006 on the days of January 5, January 11, January 19, January 25, February 1, February 8, February 23, March 1, March 8, March 13, March 22, March 29, April 5, April 10, April 19, April 26, May 3, May 8, May 15, May 22, June 1, June 7, June 14, June 23, June 29, July 5, July 7, July 12, July 19, July 26,July 28, July 29, August 2, August 16, August 23, August 30, September 7, September 13, September 27, October 4, October 12, October 17, October 25, October 27, November 15, November 20, November 30, December 6, December 13, December 20, and December 26 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 7017 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 96 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 7 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 96 samples collected, 7 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a single sample maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Enterococcus density shall not exceed 104 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 96 samples were collected at the Trinidad Lane station located in Huntington Harbour. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 96 samples were collected in 2004 on the days of April 14, April 21, April 28, May 5, May 12, May 19, May 26, June 3, June 9, June 21, June 23, June 30, July 8, August 25, September 1, September 15, November 17, November 22, December 1, December 7, December 15, and December 22; in 2005 on the days of April 20, April 27, May 11, May 17, June 22, July 7, July 13, July 20, August 3, August 10, September 2, September 8, September 13, September 21, September 26, October 5, October 13, October 19, October 26, November 2, November 9, November 16, November 21, November 28, December 7, December 13, December 21, and December 29; in 2006 on the days of January 5, January 11, January 19, January 25, February 1, February 8, February 23, March 1, March 8, March 13, March 22, March 29, April 5, April 10, April 19, April 26, May 3, May 8, May 15, May 22, June 1, June 7, June 14, June 29, July 5, July 12, July 19, July 26, August 2, August 16, August 23, August 30, September 7, September 13, September 27, October 4, October 12, October 17, October 25, November 15, November 20, November 30, December 6, December 13, December 20, and December 26 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81574 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 248 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 19 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed BeachWatch data for Huntington Harbour to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 19 of 248 samples exceed the criterion for Enterococci. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | California Ocean Plan (SWRCB 2009) single sample maximum states that enterococcus density shall not exceed 104 per 100 mL. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Data for this line of evidence for Huntington Harbour was collected at 10 monitoring sites [ MOTHERS BEACH, TRINIDAD LANE, SEA GATE, HUMBOLDT BEACH, Davenport Beach, CLUBHOUSE, HARBOUR CHANNEL, 11TH STREET BEACH, ADMIRALTY DRIVE, CORAL CAY] | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Data was collected over the time period 1/14/2009-10/28/2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. | ||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the Beach Watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6055 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 514 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 87 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 514 samples collected, 87 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Enterococcus density shall not exceed 35 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 514 samples were collected at the Anderson Street station located in Huntington Harbor. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 514 samples were collected between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limits used were EPA_1600. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 5660 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 541 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 158 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | 541 samples were taken and 158 exceeded | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Enterococcus density shall not exceed 35 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | 541 samples were collected at the location named Sunset Aquatic Park in Huntington Harbour. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected weekly between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data collected by the Orange County Health Care Agency | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6044 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 525 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 126 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 525 samples collected, 126 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Enterococcus density shall not exceed 35 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 126 samples were collected at the 11th Street Beach station located in Huntington Harbour. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 126 samples were collected weekly between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limits used were EPA_1600 and MF_APHA_9222_D. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 7015 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 541 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 117 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 541 samples collected, 117 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Enterococcus density shall not exceed 35 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 117 samples were collected at the Club House station located in Huntington Harbor. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 117 samples were collected weekly between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limits used were EPA_1600. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6067 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 487 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 26 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 487 samples collected, 26 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Enterococcus density shall not exceed 35 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 487 samples were collected at the Davenport Beach station located in Huntington Harbour. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 487 samples were collected daily between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limits used were EPA_1600. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6051 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 488 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 22 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 488 samples collected, 22 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Enterococcus density shall not exceed 35 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 488 samples were collected at the Anaheim Bay station located in Huntington Harbour. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 488 samples were collected between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limits used were EPA_1600. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6050 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 504 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 53 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 504 samples collected, 53 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Enterococcus density shall not exceed 35 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 504 samples were collected at the Admiralty Drive station located in Huntington Harbour. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 504 samples were collected weekly between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limits used were EPA_1600. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6065 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 443 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 42 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 443 samples collected, 42 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Enterococcus density shall not exceed 35 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 443 samples were collected at the Coral Clay station located in Huntington Harbor. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 443 samples were collected weekly between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was EPA_1600. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6062 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 114 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 15 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 114 samples collected, 15 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Enterococcus density shall not exceed 35 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 114 samples were collected at the Bolsa Chica station located in Huntington Harbour. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 114 samples were collected between April 2004 and December 2006 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data's quality is deemed appropriate beacause it was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6070 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 520 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 76 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 520 samples collected, 76 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Enterococcus density shall not exceed 35 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 520 samples were collected at the Harbor Channel station located in Huntington Harbor. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 520 samples were collected weekly between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limits used were EPA_1600. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6830 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 501 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 41 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 501 samples collected, 41 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan:
a. SWRCB Water-Contact Standards (1) Within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: 30d geometric mean iii. Enterococcus density shall not exceed 35 per 100 ml |
||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 501 samples were collected at the Mothers Beach station located in Huntington Harbor. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 501 samples were collected between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limits used were EPA_1600. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 7009 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 488 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 15 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 488 samples collected, 15 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Enterococcus density shall not exceed 35 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 488 samples were collected at the Sea Gate station located in Huntington Harbor. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 488 samples were collected weekly between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limits used were EPA_1600. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 7018 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 488 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 24 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 488 samples collected, 24 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Enterococcus density shall not exceed 35 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 488 samples were collected at the Trinidad Lane station located in Huntington Harbour. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 130 samples were collected between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6809 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 487 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 33 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 487 samples collected, 33 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Enterococcus density shall not exceed 35 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 487 samples were collected at the Humblodt Beach station located in Huntington Harbor. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 487 samples were collected between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limits used were EPA_1600. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81576 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 13 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | One of the 13 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for enterococcus states that the density shall not exceed 35 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at MOTHERS BEACH. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81579 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 16 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | One of the 16 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for enterococcus states that the density shall not exceed 35 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at ADMIRALTY DRIVE. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81581 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 13 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Zero of the 13 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for enterococcus states that the density shall not exceed 35 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at Davenport Beach. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81582 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 15 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Zero of the 15 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for enterococcus states that the density shall not exceed 35 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at HARBOUR CHANNEL. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81583 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 14 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 3 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Three of the 14 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for enterococcus states that the density shall not exceed 35 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at HUMBOLDT BEACH. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81584 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 14 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Zero of the 14 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for enterococcus states that the density shall not exceed 35 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at SEA GATE. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81585 | ||||
Pollutant: | Enterococcus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 14 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | One of the 14 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for enterococcus states that the density shall not exceed 35 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at TRINIDAD LANE. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81586 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 7 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | (VOL.) Chem./phys. monitoring data by quality-assured volunteer program | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | One of the seven samples exceeded the E. coli objective. The data was collected by volunteer monitoring groups during three years. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for bacteria in various waterbodies, Feb. 2005-May 2007 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentrations of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses. Region 8 Basin Plan. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The single sample E. coli concentration shall not exceed more than 235/100ml. USEPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria 1986. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria - 1986. EPA440/5-84-002 | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The data was collected from Peter's Landing - estuary and Huntington Harbor - estuary. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The data was collected in November 2003, February, May and July 2004, and May 2007. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The data was collected by volunteer monitoring groups under The Southern California Marine Institute Volunteer Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81592 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 42 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 13 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Thirteen of the forty-two samples exceeded the fecal colifrom objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The single sample fecal coliform concentration shall not exceed more than 400/100ml. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2006. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected from Huntington Harbour sites, Bolsa Chica Channel Mouth, Christiana Bay, and Warner Avenue. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected from 2006 to 2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected and analyzed under the Quality Assurance Management Plan for The Orange County Stormwater Program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 7937 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 96 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 7 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 96 samples collected, 7 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a single sample maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Fecal Coliform density shall not exceed 400 per 100ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Of the 96 samples collected, 7 exceed the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Fecal Coliform <400MPN/100mL | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 96 samples were collected at the Trinidad Lane station located in Huntington Harbour. The Single Sample Maximum under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards from the California Ocean Plan was used to assess this bacterium. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 96 samples were collected in 2004 on the days of April 14, April 21, April 28, May 5, May 12, May 19, May 26, June 3, June 9, June 21, June 23, June 30, July 8, August 25, September 1, September 15, November 17, November 22, December 1, December 7, December 15, and December 22; in 2005 on the days of April 20, April 27, May 11, May 17, June 22, July 7, July 13, July 20, August 3, August 10, September 2, September 8, September 13, September 21, September 26, October 5, October 13, October 19, October 26, November 2, November 9, November 16, November 21, November 28, December 7, December 13, December 21, and December 29; in 2006 on the days of January 5, January 11, January 19, January 25, February 1, February 8, February 23, March 1, March 8, March 13, March 22, March 29, April 5, April 10, April 19, April 26, May 3, May 8, May 15, May 22, June 1, June 7, June 14, June 29, July 5, July 12, July 19, July 26, August 2, August 16, August 23, August 30, September 7, September 13, September 27, October 4, October 12, October 17, October 25, November 15, November 20, November 30, December 6, December 13, December 20, and December 26 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | The QA of the data is considered to be acceptable because the data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limits used was MF_APHA_9222_D. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81587 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 240 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 3 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed BeachWatch data for Huntington Harbour to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 240 samples exceed the criterion for Coliform, Fecal. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | California Ocean Plan (SWRCB 2009) single sample maximum states that fecal coliform density shall not exceed 400 per 100ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Data for this line of evidence for Huntington Harbour was collected at 10 monitoring sites [ MOTHERS BEACH, TRINIDAD LANE, SEA GATE, HUMBOLDT BEACH, Davenport Beach, CLUBHOUSE, HARBOUR CHANNEL, 11TH STREET BEACH, ADMIRALTY DRIVE, CORAL CAY] | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Data was collected over the time period 1/14/2009-10/28/2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. | ||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the Beach Watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 7010 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 219 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 8 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 219 samples collected, 8 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Fecal Coliform density shall not exceed 200 per 100ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 219 samples were collected at the 11th station located in Huntington Harbour. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 219 samples were collected between April 2004 and December 2006 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_9222_D. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6056 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1083 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 77 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 1083 samples collected 77 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Fecal Coliform density shall not exceed 200 per 100ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 1083 samples were collected at the Anderson Street station located in Huntington Harbour. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 1083 samples were collected between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_9222_D. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6068 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 554 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 20 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 554 samples collected, 20 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Fecal Coliform density shall not exceed 200 per 100ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 554 samples were collected at the Davenport Beach station located in Huntington Harbour. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 554 samples were collected between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_9222_D. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6071 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 554 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 11 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 554 samples collected, 11 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Fecal Coliform density shall not exceed 200 per 100ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 554 samples were collected at the Harbour Channel station located in Huntington Harbour. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 554 samples were collected between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6992 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 616 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 33 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 616 samples collected, 33 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | |||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Fecal Coliform density shall not exceed 200 per 100ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 616 samples were collected at the Mothers Beach station located in Huntington Harbour. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 616 samples were collected March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_9222_D. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 7011 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 494 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 494 samples collected, 0 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Fecal Coliform density shall not exceed 200 per 100ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 494 samples were collected at the Sea Gate station located in Huntington Harbour. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 494 samples were collected between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_9222_D. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6810 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 564 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 13 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 564 samples collected, 13 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Fecal Coliform density shall not exceed 200 per 100ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 564 samples were collected at the Humboldt Beach station located in Huntington Harbour. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 564 samples were collected March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_9222_D. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 7938 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 516 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 18 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 516 samples collected, 18 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Fecal Coliform density shall not exceed 200 per 100ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 516 samples were collected at the Trinidad Lane station located in Huntington Harbour. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 516 samples were collected between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limits used was MF_APHA_9222_D. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 7939 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 440 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 7 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 440 samples collected, 7 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Fecal Coliform density shall not exceed 200 per 100ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 440 samples were collected at the Coral Clay station located in Huntington Harbour. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 440 samples were collected between March1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_9222_D. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 7013 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 642 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 63 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 642 samples collected, 63 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Fecal Coliform density shall not exceed 200 per 100ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 642 samples were collected at the Sunset Aquatic Park station located in Huntington Harbor. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 642 samples were collected between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_9222_D. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 7936 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 592 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 43 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 592 samples collected, 43 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Fecal Coliform density shall not exceed 200 per 100ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 592 samples were collected at the 11th Street Beach station located in Huntington Harbor. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 592 samples were collected between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limits used was MF_APHA_9222_D. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81588 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 15 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Zero of the 15 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for fecal coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 400 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at ADMIRALTY DRIVE. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81589 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 13 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Zero of the 13 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for fecal coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 400 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at 11TH STREET BEACH. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81595 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 15 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Zero of the 15 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for fecal coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 400 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at HARBOUR CHANNEL. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81596 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 13 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Zero of the 13 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for fecal coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 400 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at HUMBOLDT BEACH. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6063 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 653 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 49 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 653 samples collected, 49 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Fecal Coliform density shall not exceed 200 per 100ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 653 samples were collected at the Clubhouse station located in Huntington Harbour. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 156 samples were collected March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_9222_D. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6049 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 584 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 16 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 584 samples collected, 16 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Fecal Coliform density shall not exceed 200 per 100ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 584 samples were collected at the Admiralty Drive station located in Huntington Harbour. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 584 samples were collected between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_9222_D. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81597 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 13 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Zero of the 13 geomeans exceeded the objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The standard for fecal coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 400 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at TRINIDAD LANE. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected approximately once a week from January to October 2009 and once in October 2010. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the beach watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6061 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 482 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 30 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 482 samples collected, 30 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Fecal Coliform density shall not exceed 200 per 100ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 482 samples were collected at the Bolsa Chica station located in Huntington Harbour. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 482 samples were collected March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_9222_D. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6052 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fecal Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 515 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 12 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 515 samples collected, 12 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Fecal Coliform density shall not exceed 200 per 100ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 515 samples were collected at the Anaheim Bay station located in Huntington Harbor. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 515 samples were collected between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_9222_D. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 4414 | ||||
Pollutant: | Pathogens | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Not Recorded | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Unspecified | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Unspecified | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Unspecified | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Unspecified | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Unspecified | ||||
QAPP Information: | Unspecified | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81609 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 7 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 2 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | (VOL.) Chem./phys. monitoring data by quality-assured volunteer program | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Two of the seven samples exceeded the total coliform objective. The data was collected by volunteer monitoring groups during three years. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for bacteria in various waterbodies, Feb. 2005-May 2007 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The single sample total coliform concentration shall not exceed more than 10,000/100ml. Calidornia Ocean Plan 2006. (Basin Plan Region 8) | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The data was collected from Peter's Landing - estuary and Huntington Harbor - estuary. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The data was collected in November 2003, February, May and July 2004, and May 2007. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The data was collected by volunteer monitoring groups under The Southern California Marine Institute Volunteer Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81617 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 42 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 12 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Twelve of the forty-two samples exceeded the total colifrom objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The single sample total coliform concentration shall not exceed more than 10000/100ml. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2006. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected from Huntington Harbour sites, Bolsa Chica Channel Mouth, Christiana Bay, and Warner Avenue. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected from 2006 to 2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected and analyzed under the Quality Assurance Management Plan for The Orange County Stormwater Program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81606 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 238 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 3 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed BeachWatch data for Huntington Harbour to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 238 samples exceed the criterion for Coliform, Total. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Region 8 Beach Watch. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | California Ocean Plan (2009) single sample maximum states that total coliform density shall not exceed 10,000 per 100 mL | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Data for this line of evidence for Huntington Harbour was collected at 10 monitoring sites [ MOTHERS BEACH, TRINIDAD LANE, SEA GATE, HUMBOLDT BEACH, Davenport Beach, CLUBHOUSE, HARBOUR CHANNEL, 11TH STREET BEACH, ADMIRALTY DRIVE, CORAL CAY] | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Data was collected over the time period 1/14/2009-10/28/2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. | ||||
QAPP Information: | The samples were collected for the Beach Watch program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6048 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1039 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 13 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 1039 samples collected, 13 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column:Total Coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 ml when | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 1039 samples were collected at the Admiralty Drive station located in Huntington Harbour | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 1039 samples were collected between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_922_B. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6058 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1149 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 93 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 1149 samples collected, 93 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Total Coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 1149 samples were collected at the Anderson Street station located in Huntington Harbour | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 1149 samples were collected between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_922_B. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6054 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1023 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 16 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 1023 samples collected, 16 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Total Coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 1023 samples were collected at the Anaheim Bay station located in Huntington Harbour | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 1023 samples were collected between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_922_B. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 6064 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Coliform | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1079 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 57 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 1079 samples collected, 57 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above. | ||||
Data Reference: | Bacteria data for Huntington Harbour from 1999 to 2008 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Total Coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 ml | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The 1079 samples were collected at the Clubhouse station located in Huntington Harbour | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The 1079 samples were collected between March 1999 and December 2008 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | The data spanned 10 years including wet and dry seasons. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data's quality is acceptable because it was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_922_B. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
80431 |
Region 8 |
Huntington Harbour |
||
Pollutant: | Lead |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Sources: | A Source Unknown |
Expected TMDL Completion Date: | 2019 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with sediment toxicity to justify adding that pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List.
Three lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of 45 water samples exceed the CTR. Forty-seven of 60 samples exhibited sediment toxicity. Seven of the 60 sediment samples exceed the sediment quality guideline. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. A sediment quality guideline is available that complies with the requirements of section 6.1.3 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 3. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 4. Zero of 45 water samples exceed the CTR. Forty-seven of 60 samples exhibited sediment toxicity and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Seven of the 60 sediment samples exceed the sediment quality guideline and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 5. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 248 | ||||
Pollutant: | Lead | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 60 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 7 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Chemical monitoring of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Seven of 60 sediment samples were collected and exceeded the PEL sediment quality guideline (Santa Ana RWQCB, 2003b). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentration of toxic substance in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | PEL sediment quality guideline for lead is 112.18 µg/g/dw. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at stations 36 thru 72 in Huntington Harbour. Data were available for 32 stations (no data were included for stations 40, 45, 48, 61, and 67.) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on 08/08/2001 and 02/27/2003. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Samples were collected during dry season (8/8/01) and wet season (2/27/03). | ||||
QAPP Information: | SARWQCB followed the Bight 1998 QAPP developed by SCCWRP.Quality control data was presented. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81598 | ||||
Pollutant: | Lead | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 45 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 45 samples exceeded the water quality objective for lead. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentrations of toxic pollutants in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations (4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater for lead at 8.1 ug/L. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from within Huntington Harbor at three samples stations: Harbor Entrance (HUNBCC), Sunset Aquatic Park (HUNCRB), and Warner Avenue (HUNWAR). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected quarterly starting in Fall of 2006 through June of 2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected and analyzed in accordance with the signed and certified, Quality Assurance Management Plan for the Orange County Stormwater Program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 251 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 60 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 47 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Forty-seven of 60 samples exceeded the 90 percent of the minimum significant difference for test species Eohaustorius estuarius. Twenty of 30 samples exhibited toxicity in the dry season (8/7/01 and 8/8/01), and 27 of 30 exhibited toxicity in the wet season (2/24/03) (Phillips et al., 1998). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: "The concentration of toxic pollutants in the water column, sediment or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial use." | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at 32 stations (no data were included for stations 40, 45, 48, 61, and 67). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on 8/7/01, 8/8/01 and 2/24/03. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Samples were collected during dry (8/7/01, 8/8/01) and wet season (2/24/03). | ||||
QAPP Information: | SARQWCB followed the Bight 1998 QAPP developed by SCCWRP. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
76729 |
Region 8 |
Huntington Harbour |
||
Pollutant: | Toxicity |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Sources: | A Source Unknown |
Expected TMDL Completion Date: | 2025 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 at least one line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status for toxicity, and waters may be placed on the CWA section 303(d) List for toxicity alone.
Three lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Fifty-three out of 81 samples exhibited sediment toxicity. Fourteen out of 39 samples exhibited water toxicity. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Fifty-three out of 81 samples exhibited sediment toxicity and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Fourteen out of 39 samples exhibited water toxicity and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81619 | ||||
Pollutant: | Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 21 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 6 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | TOXICITY TESTING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Twenty-one samples were collected to evaluate sediment toxicity. Six of the 21 samples exhibited significant toxicity. The toxicity tests included survival of Eohaustorius. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Toxic substances shall not be discharged at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic resources to levels which are harmful to human health. Region 8 Basin Plan. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Toxicity is defined as a statistically significant effect in the sample exposure compared to the control using EPA-recommended hypothesis testing. The t-test is used to determine if there is a statistically significant decrease in organism response in the sample as compared to the control. Exceedances are counted with the significant effect code SL. SL is defined as the result being significant compared to the negative control based on a statistical test, less than stated the alpha level, AND less than the evaluation threshold. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Methods for Assessing the Toxicity of Sediment-associated Contaminants with Estuarine and Marine Amphipods. June 1994. EPA 600/R-94/025 | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at stations HUNBCC, HUNCRB, HUNWAR Huntington Harbour. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected approximately twice a year from 2006 to 2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The data collected under the Quality Assurance Management Plan for The Orange County Stormwater Program. The SWAMP measurement quality objectives were followed for toxicity data. The performance of toxicity bioassays and evaluation of reference toxicants were performed using USEPA and Standard Methods. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 251 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 60 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 47 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Forty-seven of 60 samples exceeded the 90 percent of the minimum significant difference for test species Eohaustorius estuarius. Twenty of 30 samples exhibited toxicity in the dry season (8/7/01 and 8/8/01), and 27 of 30 exhibited toxicity in the wet season (2/24/03) (Phillips et al., 1998). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: "The concentration of toxic pollutants in the water column, sediment or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial use." | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at 32 stations (no data were included for stations 40, 45, 48, 61, and 67). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on 8/7/01, 8/8/01 and 2/24/03. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Samples were collected during dry (8/7/01, 8/8/01) and wet season (2/24/03). | ||||
QAPP Information: | SARQWCB followed the Bight 1998 QAPP developed by SCCWRP. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81618 | ||||
Pollutant: | Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 39 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 14 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | TOXICITY TESTING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Thirty-nine samples were collected at three different stations to evaluate water toxicity. Fourteen of the 39 samples exhibited significant toxicity. The toxicity tests that exhibited significant toxicity included chronic and acute Mysid Survival and biomass, and Purple Urchin fertilized and development. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Toxic substances shall not be discharged at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic resources to levels which are harmful to human health. Region 8 Basin Plan. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Toxicity is defined as a statistically significant effect in the sample exposure compared to the control using EPA-recommended hypothesis testing. The t-test is used to determine if there is a statistically significant decrease in organism response in the sample as compared to the control. Exceedances are counted with the significant effect code SL. SL is defined as the result being significant compared to the negative control based on a statistical test, less than stated the alpha level, AND less than the evaluation threshold. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to West Coast Marine and Estuarine Organisms. EPA/600/R-95-136. | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at stations HUNBCC, HUNCRB, and HUNWAR- Huntington Harbour. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected approximately quarterly from 2006 to 2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | The data collected under the Quality Assurance Management Plan for The Orange County Stormwater Program. The SWAMP measurement quality objectives were followed for toxicity data. The performance of toxicity bioassays and evaluation of reference toxicants were performed using USEPA and Standard Methods. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
97274 |
Region 8 |
Huntington Harbour |
||
Pollutant: | Arsenic |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 43 samples exceed the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of the 43 samples exceed the CRITERIA and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81569 | ||||
Pollutant: | Arsenic | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 43 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 43 samples exceeded the water quality objective for arsenic. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentrations of toxic pollutants in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations (4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater for arsenic at 36 ug/L. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from within Huntington Harbor at three samples stations: Harbor Entrance (HUNBCC), Sunset Aquatic Park (HUNCRB), and Warner Avenue (HUNWAR). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected quarterly starting in Fall of 2006 through June of 2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected and analyzed in accordance with the signed and certified, Quality Assurance Management Plan for the Orange County Stormwater Program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
68080 |
Region 8 |
Huntington Harbour |
||
Pollutant: | Cadmium |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with sediment toxicity to justify adding that pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List.
Three lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of 45 water samples exceed the criteria and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Zero of 65 sediment samples exceed the guideline and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Sediment toxicity is observed. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of 45 water samples exceed the criteria and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Zero of 65 sediment samples exceed the guideline and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that though this water body is impaired for sediment toxicity, this water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable the water or sediment quality standards for these pollutants are not being exceeded or are insufficient to determine use support. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 251 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 60 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 47 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Forty-seven of 60 samples exceeded the 90 percent of the minimum significant difference for test species Eohaustorius estuarius. Twenty of 30 samples exhibited toxicity in the dry season (8/7/01 and 8/8/01), and 27 of 30 exhibited toxicity in the wet season (2/24/03) (Phillips et al., 1998). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: "The concentration of toxic pollutants in the water column, sediment or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial use." | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at 32 stations (no data were included for stations 40, 45, 48, 61, and 67). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on 8/7/01, 8/8/01 and 2/24/03. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Samples were collected during dry (8/7/01, 8/8/01) and wet season (2/24/03). | ||||
QAPP Information: | SARQWCB followed the Bight 1998 QAPP developed by SCCWRP. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81570 | ||||
Pollutant: | Cadmium | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 45 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 45 samples exceeded the water quality objective for cadmium. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentrations of toxic pollutants in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations (4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater for cadmium at 9.3 ug/L. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from within Huntington Harbor at three samples stations: Harbor Entrance (HUNBCC), Sunset Aquatic Park (HUNCRB), and Warner Avenue (HUNWAR). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected quarterly starting in Fall of 2006 through June of 2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected and analyzed in accordance with the signed and certified, Quality Assurance Management Plan for the Orange County Stormwater Program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 247 | ||||
Pollutant: | Cadmium | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 65 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Chemical monitoring of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 65 samples exceeded the cadmium PEL sediment quality guideline. (Bay and Greenstein, 2003). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentration of toxic substance in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | There is a sediment quality guideline for cadmium of 4.21 ug/g dw. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at Huntington Harbor, stations labeled 36 through 72. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on 08/08/2001 and 02/27/2003. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SARWQCB followed the Bight 1998 QAPP developed by SCCWRP.Quality control data was presented. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
97331 |
Region 8 |
Huntington Harbour |
||
Pollutant: | Chlorpyrifos |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 36 samples exceed the CRITERIA. However, 9 samples had a reporting limit higher than 9 ng/L rendering them unusable for assessment purposes. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of the 36 samples exceed the CRITERIA and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81571 | ||||
Pollutant: | Chlorpyrifos | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 36 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of 36 samples exceed the Criteria Continuous Concentration for Chlorpyrifos of 9 ng/L. However, 9 samples had a reporting limit higher than 9 ng/L rendering them unusable for assessment purposes. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Marine communities, including vertebrate, invertebrate, and plant species, shall not be degraded. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The Criteria Continuous Concentration for chlorpyrifos in saltwater is 9 ng/L. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at sites: HUNBCC, HUNCRB and HUNWAR. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected 2006 to 2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Data were submitted with the County of Orange Stormwater Program Quality Assurance Management Plan (QAMP) dated January 2010. The Regional Water Board has determined that equivalent QA/QC documentation exists within the Water Quality Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Orange County MS4 permit and appendix C-11- X of the 2008-09 monitoring report. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Orange County Stormwater Program. | ||||
DECISION ID |
97333 |
Region 8 |
Huntington Harbour |
||
Pollutant: | Diazinon |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 45 samples exceed the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of the 45 samples exceed the CRITERIA and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81573 | ||||
Pollutant: | Diazinon | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 45 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 45 samples exceeded the Criteria Continuous Concentration for diazinon of 820 ng/L. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Marine communities, including vertebrate, invertebrate, and plant species, shall not be degraded. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The Criteria Continuous Concentration for diazinon in saltwater is 820 ng/L. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Diazinon | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at sites: HUNBCC, HUNCRB and HUNWAR. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | amples were collected 2006 to 2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Data were submitted with the County of Orange Stormwater Program Quality Assurance Management Plan (QAMP) dated January 2010. However, data were collected prior to the development of this QAMP, therefore the quality of these data are unknown. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
68526 |
Region 8 |
Huntington Harbour |
||
Pollutant: | Endrin |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | There was no new data considered in the 2014 Listing Cycle, this previously made decision will carryover. The following description applies to an earlier Listing Cycle.
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 a two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the sediment samples exceeds the sediment quality guidelines. There is sediment toxicity documented in this water body, however, it does not appear to be linked to this pollutant. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The sediment quality guideline used complies with the requirements of section 6.1.3 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 3. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 4. None of 60 samples exceeded the sediment quality guideline, and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 5. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current. The decision has not changed. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 250 | ||||
Pollutant: | Endrin | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 60 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Chemical monitoring of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of 60 samples exceeded the sediment quality guidelines for endrin (Santa Ana RWQCB, 2003b). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentration of toxic substance in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The sediment quality guideline for endrin is 0.76 ug/g (ppm) dry weight (USEPA, 1993). | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at stations 36 though 72 in Huntington Harbor. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on 08/07/2001 and on 02/27/2003. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Samples were collected during dry season (8/7/01) and wet season (2/27/03). | ||||
QAPP Information: | SARWQCB followed the Bight 1998 QAPP developed by SCCWRP.Quality control data was presented. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 251 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 60 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 47 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Forty-seven of 60 samples exceeded the 90 percent of the minimum significant difference for test species Eohaustorius estuarius. Twenty of 30 samples exhibited toxicity in the dry season (8/7/01 and 8/8/01), and 27 of 30 exhibited toxicity in the wet season (2/24/03) (Phillips et al., 1998). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: "The concentration of toxic pollutants in the water column, sediment or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial use." | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at 32 stations (no data were included for stations 40, 45, 48, 61, and 67). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on 8/7/01, 8/8/01 and 2/24/03. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Samples were collected during dry (8/7/01, 8/8/01) and wet season (2/24/03). | ||||
QAPP Information: | SARQWCB followed the Bight 1998 QAPP developed by SCCWRP. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
69570 |
Region 8 |
Huntington Harbour |
||
Pollutant: | Invasive Species |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollution |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.10 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.10 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The pollutant does not exceed the water quality objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The invasive aquatic plant, Caulerpa taxifolia has not been detected in Huntington Harbour since 2002. Eradication and monitoring of infected sites has been ongoing since it was discovered in July 2000. So the pollutant does not exceed the water quality objective and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current. The decision has not changed. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 252 | ||||
Pollutant: | Invasive Species | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Population/Community Degradation | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Caulerpa taxifolia was discovered in July 2000 at Huntington Harbour near Long Beach, CA. Intensive monitoring and surveillance of infested waters has been ongoing. Infested areas have been contained and treated in the past. Since 2002 no Caulerpa has been detected in Huntington Harbour. (Anderson, 2005). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Toxic Substances: The concentrations of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Huntington Harbour near Long Beach, CA. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | From July 2000 to 2002. Currently no Caulerpa has been detected in Huntington Harbour. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Changes in relative diversity and abundance of native species may also be driven by habitat alteration, flow changes, or hydromodification. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Powerpoint presentation by Lars W.J. Anderson, USDA Ag. Research Svc., Davis, CA. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
97372 |
Region 8 |
Huntington Harbour |
||
Pollutant: | Malathion |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of 45 samples exceed the GUIDELINE. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of 45 samples exceed the GUIDELINE and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81599 | ||||
Pollutant: | Malathion | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 45 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 45 samples exceeded the maximum concentration for Malathion of 100 ng/L. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Marine communities, including vertebrate, invertebrate, and plant species, shall not be degraded. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The maximum (Instantaneous) concentration for Malathion in saltwater is 100 ng/L. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Quality Criteria for Water. USEPA Office of Water and Hazardous Materials. Washington, D.C | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at sites: HUNBCC, HUNCRB and HUNWAR. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected 2006 to 2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Data were submitted with the County of Orange Stormwater Program Quality Assurance Management Plan (QAMP) dated January 2010. However, data were collected prior to the development of this QAMP, therefore the quality of these data are unknown. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
97922 |
Region 8 |
Huntington Harbour |
||
Pollutant: | Mercury |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. One of the 6 samples exceed the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. One of the 6 samples exceed the CRITERIA and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81600 | ||||
Pollutant: | Mercury | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 6 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | One of the six samples exceeded the water quality objective for mercury. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentrations of toxic pollutants in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | National Recommended Water Quality Criteria Continuous Concentrations (4-day average concentrations) for saltwater aquatic organisms exposure to elemental mercury is 0.94 ug/L. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from within Huntington Harbor at three samples stations: Harbor Entrance (HUNBCC), Sunset Aquatic Park (HUNCRB), and Warner Avenue (HUNWAR). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected quarterly starting in Fall of 2006 through June of 2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected and analyzed in accordance with the signed and certified, Quality Assurance Management Plan for the Orange County Stormwater Program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81601 | ||||
Pollutant: | Mercury | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 6 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | One of the six samples exceeded the water quality objective for mercury. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentrations of toxic pollutants in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | National Recommended Water Quality Criteria Continuous Concentrations (4-day average concentrations) for saltwater aquatic organisms exposure to elemental mercury is 0.94 ug/L. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected quarterly starting in Fall of 2006 through June of 2009. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected from within Huntington Harbor at three samples stations: Harbor Entrance (HUNBCC), Sunset Aquatic Park (HUNCRB), and Warner Avenue (HUNWAR). | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected and analyzed in accordance with the signed and certified, Quality Assurance Management Plan for the Orange County Stormwater Program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
97921 |
Region 8 |
Huntington Harbour |
||
Pollutant: | Selenium |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
One] line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 43 samples exceed the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of the 43 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81604 | ||||
Pollutant: | Selenium | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 43 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 43 samples exceeded the water quality objective for selenium. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentrations of toxic pollutants in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations (4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater for selenium at 71 ug/L. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from within Huntington Harbor at three samples stations: Harbor Entrance (HUNBCC), Sunset Aquatic Park (HUNCRB), and Warner Avenue (HUNWAR). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected quarterly starting in Fall of 2006 through June of 2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected and analyzed in accordance with the signed and certified, Quality Assurance Management Plan for the Orange County Stormwater Program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
97861 |
Region 8 |
Huntington Harbour |
||
Pollutant: | Silver |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 45 samples exceed the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of the 45 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81605 | ||||
Pollutant: | Silver | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 45 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 45 samples exceeded the water quality objective for silver. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentrations of toxic pollutants in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion maximum concentrations (1-hour average) for silver to protect aquatic life in saltwater as 1.9 ug/L. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from within Huntington Harbor at three samples stations: Harbor Entrance (HUNBCC), Sunset Aquatic Park (HUNCRB), and Warner Avenue (HUNWAR). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected quarterly starting in Fall of 2006 through June of 2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected and analyzed in accordance with the signed and certified, Quality Assurance Management Plan for the Orange County Stormwater Program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
97920 |
Region 8 |
Huntington Harbour |
||
Pollutant: | Zinc |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 45 samples exceed the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of the 45 samples exceed the CRITERIA and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81620 | ||||
Pollutant: | Zinc | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 45 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 45 samples exceeded the water quality objective for zinc. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentrations of toxic pollutants in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations (4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater for zinc at 81 ug/L. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from within Huntington Harbor at three samples stations: Harbor Entrance (HUNBCC), Sunset Aquatic Park (HUNCRB), and Warner Avenue (HUNWAR). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected quarterly starting in Fall of 2006 through June of 2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Samples were collected and analyzed in accordance with the signed and certified, Quality Assurance Management Plan for the Orange County Stormwater Program. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
88777 |
Region 8 |
Huntington Harbour |
||
Pollutant: | pH |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section three (3) of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2, a single line of evidence is necessary to assess the listing status.
One (1) line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero (0) of the two (2) samples exceed the Objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero (0) of the two (2) samples exceeded the Objective and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 26 samples are needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.2. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 81603 | ||||
Pollutant: | pH | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Numeric data generated from 2 samples of pH data had no exceedences. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data for bacteria in various waterbodies, Feb. 2005-May 2007 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The pH of bay or estuary waters shall not be raised above 8.6 or depressed below 7.0 as a result of controllable water quality factors... | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from the Huntington Harbor and Peter's Landing stations | ||||
Temporal Representation: | One sample was collected on 5/5/2007. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | NPDES quality assurance. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
68183 |
Region 8 |
Huntington Harbour |
||
Pollutant: | Chlordane |
Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Sources: | A Source Unknown |
Expected TMDL Completion Date: | 2019 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Regional Board conclusion:
This pollutant was considered for placement on the section 303(d) list in a previous assessment cycle. No new information was reviewed for this current assessment cycle. Therefore, the previous conclusion remains unchanged, and is as follows: This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with sediment toxicity to justify adding that pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List. Multiple lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on section 3.6 the site has significant sediment toxicity and the pollutant is likely to cause or contribute to the toxic effect. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The sediment quality guideline used complies with the requirements of section 6.1.3 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 3. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 4. Seven of 60 samples exceeded ERM sediment guideline, and 47 of 60 samples exhibit toxicity, and these exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 5. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current cycle. The decision has not changed. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 249 | ||||
Pollutant: | Chlordane | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 60 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 7 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Chemical monitoring of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Seven of 60 sediment samples exceeded the ERM guideline (Santa Ana RWQCB, 2003b). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentration of toxic substance in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (Santa Ana RWQCB, 1995a). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The ERM sediment quality guideline for chlordane is 6 ng/g (ppb) dry weight (Long et. al., 1990). | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at stations 36 through 72 in Huntington Harbour. Data were available for 32 stations (no data were included for stations 40, 45, 48, 61, and 67). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on August 2001 and February 2003. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Samples were collected during dry season (August 2001) and wet season (February 2003). | ||||
QAPP Information: | SARWQCB followed the Bight 1998 QAPP developed by SCCWRP.Quality control data was presented. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 251 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 60 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 47 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Forty-seven of 60 samples exceeded the 90 percent of the minimum significant difference for test species Eohaustorius estuarius. Twenty of 30 samples exhibited toxicity in the dry season (8/7/01 and 8/8/01), and 27 of 30 exhibited toxicity in the wet season (2/24/03) (Phillips et al., 1998). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: "The concentration of toxic pollutants in the water column, sediment or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial use." | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at 32 stations (no data were included for stations 40, 45, 48, 61, and 67). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on 8/7/01, 8/8/01 and 2/24/03. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Samples were collected during dry (8/7/01, 8/8/01) and wet season (2/24/03). | ||||
QAPP Information: | SARQWCB followed the Bight 1998 QAPP developed by SCCWRP. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
70200 |
Region 8 |
Huntington Harbour |
||
Pollutant: | PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) |
Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Sources: | A Source Unknown |
Expected TMDL Completion Date: | 2019 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | There was no new data considered in the 2014 Listing Cycle, this previously made decision will carryover. The following description applies to an earlier Listing Cycle.
303(d) listing decisions made prior to 2006 were not held in an assessment database. The Regional Boards will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current. The decision has not changed. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 4415 | ||||
Pollutant: | PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) (tissue) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Tissue | ||||
Matrix: | Tissue | ||||
Fraction: | Not Recorded | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Unspecified | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Unspecified | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Unspecified | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Unspecified | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Unspecified | ||||
QAPP Information: | Unspecified | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||