Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119649, Aldicarb
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
185858 |
|
Pollutant: |
Aldicarb |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
33 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 33 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Aldicarb. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for aldicarb incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 3 ug/L |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-18 and 2015-09-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Pollutant: |
Aldrin |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119650, Aldrin
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
186030 |
|
Pollutant: |
Aldrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Aldrin. Although a total of 9 samples were collected, 9 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Aldrin criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.00013 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL). |
Temporal Representation: |
Date for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2011-01-18 to 2014-08-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the listing status for this water body-pollutant combination should not change this cycle because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119625, Arsenic
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
186348 |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
12 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 12 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Arsenic. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Primary Maximum Contaminant Level for arsenic incorporated by reference in the Basin Plan is 0.010 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-18 and 2014-08-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119625, Arsenic
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
69135 |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
16 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 16 samples exceed the criterion for Arsenic. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for arsenic is 0.010 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Prairie Flower Drain @ Crows Landing Rd - 535XPFDCL] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/11/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
Atrazine |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the listing status for this water body-pollutant combination should not change this cycle because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119626, Atrazine
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
69143 |
|
Pollutant: |
Atrazine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
16 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 16 samples exceed the criterion for Atrazine. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for atrazine is 1 ug/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Prairie Flower Drain @ Crows Landing Rd - 535XPFDCL] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/11/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119626, Atrazine
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
186479 |
|
Pollutant: |
Atrazine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
33 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 33 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Atrazine. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Primary Maximum Contaminant Level for atrazine incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 0.001 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-18 and 2015-09-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the listing status for this water body-pollutant combination should not change this cycle because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119627, Cadmium
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
69147 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
16 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 16 samples exceed the criterion for Cadmium. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for cadmium is 5 ug/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Prairie Flower Drain @ Crows Landing Rd - 535XPFDCL] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/11/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119627, Cadmium
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
186632 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
8 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cadmium. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Primary Maximum Contaminant Level for cadmium incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 0.005 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-18 and 2011-08-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119627, Cadmium
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
186775 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
11 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 11 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cadmium. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Primary Maximum Contaminant Level for cadmium incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 0.005 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-18 and 2014-08-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Pollutant: |
Carbofuran |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the listing status for this water body-pollutant combination should not change this cycle because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119628, Carbofuran
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
69154 |
|
Pollutant: |
Carbofuran |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
16 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 16 samples exceed the criterion for Carbofuran. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for Carbofuran is 18 ug/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Prairie Flower Drain @ Crows Landing Rd - 535XPFDCL] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/11/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119628, Carbofuran
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
186864 |
|
Pollutant: |
Carbofuran |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
33 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 33 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Carbofuran. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Primary Maximum Contaminant Level for Carbofuran incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 0.018 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-18 and 2015-09-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlordane |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119629, Chlordane
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
187055 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlordane |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chlordane. Although a total of 9 samples were collected, 9 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Chlordane criterion for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.00057 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL). |
Temporal Representation: |
Date for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2011-01-18 to 2014-08-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the listing status for this water body-pollutant combination should not change this cycle because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119630, Copper
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
187803 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
16 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 16 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Copper. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level for copper incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 1.0 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-18 and 2014-08-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119630, Copper
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
69155 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
16 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 16 samples exceed the criterion for Copper. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California secondary maximum contaminant level for copper is 1.0 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels and Compliance. CCR Title 22 section 64449. |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Prairie Flower Drain @ Crows Landing Rd - 535XPFDCL] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/11/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119630, Copper
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
187816 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
15 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 15 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Copper. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level for copper incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 1.0 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-18 and 2014-02-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Pollutant: |
DDD (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane) |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
|
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 128159, DDD (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane)
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
188015 |
|
Pollutant: |
DDD (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for DDD(p,p'). Although a total of 9 samples were collected, 9 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The DDD(p,p) criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.00059 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL). |
Temporal Representation: |
Date for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2011-01-18 to 2014-08-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Pollutant: |
DDE (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene) |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
|
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 128160, DDE (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene)
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
188218 |
|
Pollutant: |
DDE (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for DDE(p,p'). Although a total of 9 samples were collected, 9 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The DDE(p,p) criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.00059 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL). |
Temporal Representation: |
Date for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2011-01-18 to 2014-08-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the listing status for this water body-pollutant combination should not change this cycle because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 128161, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
188312 |
|
Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for DDT(p,p'). Although a total of 9 samples were collected, 8 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The DDT(p,p) criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.00059 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2011-01-18 to 2014-08-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 128161, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
69165 |
|
Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 0 samples exceed the criterion for DDT(p,p). Sixteen samples were not used in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit was above the objective and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The criterion for total DDT to protect human health from consumption of water and organisms is 0.00059 ug/L (California Toxics Rule). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Prairie Flower Drain @ Crows Landing Rd - 535XPFDCL] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/11/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
Dieldrin |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the listing status for this water body-pollutant combination should not change this cycle because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119632, Dieldrin
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
188735 |
|
Pollutant: |
Dieldrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Dieldrin. Although a total of 9 samples were collected, 9 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Dieldrin criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.00014 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL). |
Temporal Representation: |
Date for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2011-01-18 to 2014-08-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119632, Dieldrin
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
69175 |
|
Pollutant: |
Dieldrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 0 samples exceed the criterion for Dieldrin. Sixteen samples were not used in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the objective and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The criterion for Dieldrin to protect human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.00014 ug/L (California Toxics Rule). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Prairie Flower Drain @ Crows Landing Rd - 535XPFDCL] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/11/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
Endrin |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the listing status for this water body-pollutant combination should not change this cycle because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119633, Endrin
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
69182 |
|
Pollutant: |
Endrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
16 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 16 samples exceed the criterion for Endrin. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Endrin criterion for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.76 ug/L. (California Toxics Rule, 2000) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Prairie Flower Drain @ Crows Landing Rd - 535XPFDCL] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/11/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119633, Endrin
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
189305 |
|
Pollutant: |
Endrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Endrin. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Endrin criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.76 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-18 and 2014-08-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Pollutant: |
Glyphosate |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the listing status for this water body-pollutant combination should not change this cycle because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119634, Glyphosate
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
69056 |
|
Pollutant: |
Glyphosate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
16 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 16 samples exceed the criterion for Glyphosate. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for Glyphosate is 700 ug/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Prairie Flower Drain @ Crows Landing Rd - 535XPFDCL] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/11/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119634, Glyphosate
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
189986 |
|
Pollutant: |
Glyphosate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
11 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 11 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Glyphosate. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Primary Maximum Contaminant Level for Glyphosate incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 0.7 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-18 and 2018-07-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Pollutant: |
Heptachlor |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119635, Heptachlor
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
190530 |
|
Pollutant: |
Heptachlor |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor. Although a total of 9 samples were collected, 9 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Heptachlor criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.00021 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL). |
Temporal Representation: |
Date for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2011-01-18 to 2014-08-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Pollutant: |
Heptachlor epoxide |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119636, Heptachlor epoxide
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
190477 |
|
Pollutant: |
Heptachlor epoxide |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor Epoxide. Although a total of 9 samples were collected, 9 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Heptachlor Epoxide criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.0001 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL). |
Temporal Representation: |
Date for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2011-01-18 to 2014-08-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Pollutant: |
Hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH), alpha |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119652, Hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH), alpha
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
190245 |
|
Pollutant: |
Hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH), alpha |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for HCH, alpha-. Although a total of 9 samples were collected, 9 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The alpha-HCH (alpha-BHC) criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of water and organisms is 0.0039 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL). |
Temporal Representation: |
Date for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2011-01-18 to 2014-08-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Pollutant: |
Hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH), beta |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
|
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119651, Hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH), beta
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
190133 |
|
Pollutant: |
Hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH), beta |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for HCH, beta-. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The BHC, beta criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.014 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-18 and 2014-08-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119637, Lead
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
190689 |
|
Pollutant: |
Lead |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
8 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: At a minimum, water designated for use as MUN shall not contain lead in excess of 0.015 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-18 and 2011-08-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119637, Lead
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
190784 |
|
Pollutant: |
Lead |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
12 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 12 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: At a minimum, water designated for use as MUN shall not contain lead in excess of 0.015 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-18 and 2014-08-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Pollutant: |
Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH) |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
|
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119638, Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH)
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
190026 |
|
Pollutant: |
Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for HCH, gamma-. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The BHC, gamma(Lindane) criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.019 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-18 and 2014-08-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Pollutant: |
Methoxychlor |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the listing status for this water body-pollutant combination should not change this cycle because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119639, Methoxychlor
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
69071 |
|
Pollutant: |
Methoxychlor |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
16 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 16 samples exceed the criterion for Methoxychlor. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for Methoxychlor, 30 ug/L, is incorporated by reference into the (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin Basins). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Prairie Flower Drain @ Crows Landing Rd - 535XPFDCL] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/11/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119639, Methoxychlor
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
191347 |
|
Pollutant: |
Methoxychlor |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Methoxychlor. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Primary Maximum Contaminant Level for Methoxychlor incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 0.03 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-18 and 2014-08-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the listing status for this water body-pollutant combination should not change this cycle because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119640, Nickel
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
191898 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
12 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 12 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Primary Maximum Contaminant Level for nickel incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 0.1 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-18 and 2011-12-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119640, Nickel
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
191921 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
16 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 16 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Primary Maximum Contaminant Level for nickel incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 0.1 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-18 and 2014-08-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119640, Nickel
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
69078 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
16 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 16 samples exceed the criterion for Nickel. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for nickel is 0.1 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Prairie Flower Drain @ Crows Landing Rd - 535XPFDCL] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/11/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the listing status for this water body-pollutant combination should not change this cycle because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119641, Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
69079 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
22 |
Number of Exceedances: |
22 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 22 of 22 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate/Nitrite as N. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for nitrate + nitrite (as N) is 10.0 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Prairie Flower Drain @ Crows Landing Rd - 535XPFDCL] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 10/21/2008-7/20/2010. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119641, Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
192202 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
62 |
Number of Exceedances: |
46 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 46 of 62 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate + Nitrite as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate + nitrite (as N) incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 10 mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-09-14 and 2018-09-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxamyl (Vydate) |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the listing status for this water body-pollutant combination should not change this cycle because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119642, Oxamyl (Vydate)
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
79647 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxamyl (Vydate) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
16 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staff assessed ILRP data for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 16 samples exceed the criterion for Oxamyl. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for Oxamyl incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin Basins is 50 ug/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin Basins). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Prairie Flower Drain @ Crows Landing Rd - 535XPFDCL] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/11/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119642, Oxamyl (Vydate)
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
192626 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxamyl (Vydate) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
33 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 33 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxamyl. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Primary Maximum Contaminant Level for Oxamyl incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 0.05 mg/L |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-18 and 2015-09-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Pollutant: |
Selenium |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the listing status for this water body-pollutant combination should not change this cycle because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119644, Selenium
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
69099 |
|
Pollutant: |
Selenium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
12 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 12 samples exceed the criterion for Selenium. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for selenium is 0.05 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Prairie Flower Drain @ Crows Landing Rd - 535XPFDCL] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/11/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119644, Selenium
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
193272 |
|
Pollutant: |
Selenium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
16 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 16 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Selenium. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Primary Maximum Contaminant Level for selenium incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 0.05 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-18 and 2014-08-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Pollutant: |
Simazine |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the listing status for this water body-pollutant combination should not change this cycle because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119645, Simazine
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
69102 |
|
Pollutant: |
Simazine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
16 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 16 samples exceed the criterion for Simazine. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for Simazine is 4 ug/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Prairie Flower Drain @ Crows Landing Rd - 535XPFDCL] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/11/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119645, Simazine
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
193539 |
|
Pollutant: |
Simazine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
33 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 33 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Simazine. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Primary Maximum Contaminant Level for Simazine incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 0.004 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-18 and 2015-09-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the listing status for this water body-pollutant combination should not change this cycle because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are not exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 128162, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
230082 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
63 |
Number of Exceedances: |
59 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 59 of 63 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin for specific conductance is 900 uS/cm. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-09-14 and 2016-12-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 128162, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
69181 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
57 |
Number of Exceedances: |
56 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 56 of 57 samples exceed the criterion for Conductivity(Us). |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California secondary maximum contaminant levels for electrical conductivity provide a range of values including a recommended level (900 uS/cm), an upper level (1,600 uS/cm) and a short-term level (2,200 uS/cm). The recommended level of 900 uS/cm was used as it is protective of all drinking water uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels and Compliance. CCR Title 22 section 64449. |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) was collected at 2 monitoring sites [Prairie Flower Drain @ Crows Landing Rd - 535XPFDCL, Prairie Flower Drain at Morgan Road - 535XPFDMR] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/11/2007-7/20/2010. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
Total Dissolved Solids |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the listing status for this water body-pollutant combination should not change this cycle because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119646, Total Dissolved Solids
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
79646 |
|
Pollutant: |
Total Dissolved Solids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
38 |
Number of Exceedances: |
38 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staff assessed ILRP data for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 38 of 38 samples exceed the criterion for Dissolved Solids. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: At a minimum, water designated for MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the MCL specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. The secondary MCL for Total Dissolved Solids is 500 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Prairie Flower Drain @ Crows Landing Rd - 535XPFDCL] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/11/2007-7/20/2010. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119646, Total Dissolved Solids
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
193876 |
|
Pollutant: |
Total Dissolved Solids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
29 |
Number of Exceedances: |
27 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 27 of 29 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Total Dissolved Solids. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level for total dissolved solids incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 500 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-09-14 and 2013-09-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxaphene |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119647, Toxaphene
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
193829 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxaphene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Toxaphene. Although a total of 9 samples were collected, 9 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Toxaphene criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.00073 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL). |
Temporal Representation: |
Date for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2011-01-18 to 2014-08-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Pollutant: |
Zinc |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the listing status for this water body-pollutant combination should not change this cycle because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119648, Zinc
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
69112 |
|
Pollutant: |
Zinc |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
16 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 16 samples exceed the criterion for Zinc. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California secondary maximum contaminant level for zinc is 5.0 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels and Compliance. CCR Title 22 section 64449. |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Prairie Flower Drain @ Crows Landing Rd - 535XPFDCL] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/11/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119648, Zinc
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
194235 |
|
Pollutant: |
Zinc |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
16 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 16 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Zinc. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level for zinc incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 5.0 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-18 and 2014-08-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 119648, Zinc
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
194265 |
|
Pollutant: |
Zinc |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
12 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition data for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 12 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Zinc. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level for zinc incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 5.0 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (535XPFDCL) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-18 and 2011-12-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Michael L. Johnson LLC. 2015. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition |
|
Pollutant: |
alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1) |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
|
|
|
Pollutant: |
beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2) |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
|
|
|
Pollutant: |
Molinate |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89573, Molinate
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
69077 |
|
Pollutant: |
Molinate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
16 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 16 samples exceed the criterion for Molinate. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for Molinate is 20 ug/L . |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Prairie Flower Drain @ Crows Landing Rd - 535XPFDCL] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/11/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrate |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89575, Nitrogen, Nitrate
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
69080 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
22 |
Number of Exceedances: |
20 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 20 of 22 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate as N. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for nitrate (NO3 as N) is 10.0 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Prarie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) was collected at 2 monitoring sites [Prairie Flower Drain at Morgan Road - 535XPFDMR, Prairie Flower Drain @ Crows Landing Rd - 535XPFDCL] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/11/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrite |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89576, Nitrogen, Nitrite
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
69081 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrite |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
16 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 16 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrite as N. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for nitrite (as N) is 1 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Prairie Flower Drain @ Crows Landing Rd - 535XPFDCL] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/11/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
Thiobencarb/Bolero |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 88342, Thiobencarb/Bolero
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
69110 |
|
Pollutant: |
Thiobencarb/Bolero |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
16 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 16 samples exceed the criterion for Thiobencarb. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters designated for use as domestic or municipal supply (MUN) shall not contain concentrations of Thiobencarb in excess of 1.0 µg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Prairie Flower Drain @ Crows Landing Rd - 535XPFDCL] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/11/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 88345, pH
|
Region 5 |
Prairie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
79648 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
57 |
Number of Exceedances: |
4 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staff assessed ILRP data for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 4 of 57 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Prarrie Flower Drain (Stanislaus County) was collected at 2 monitoring sites [ Prairie Flower Drain @ Crows Landing Rd - 535XPFDCL, Prairie Flower Drain at Morgan Road - 535XPFDMR] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/11/2007-7/20/2010. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|