Pollutant: |
Alachlor |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89469, Alachlor
|
Region 5 |
Livingston Canal (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
66154 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alachlor |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
10 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
A total of 10 individual whole water samples were collected; 0 of 10 samples exceeded the objective (2 ug/L). |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Merced Irrigation District, 2005-2008. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for alachlor is 2 ug/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Livingston Canal (Merced County) was collected at 3 monitoring sites [Livingston Canal at Walnut Ave - 545MRDLWA, Livingston Canal at Winton Way - 545MRDLWW, Livingston Canal Spill to Merced R - 545MRDLCM] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 7/31/2007-9/16/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Atrazine |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89470, Atrazine
|
Region 5 |
Livingston Canal (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
66156 |
|
Pollutant: |
Atrazine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
10 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
A total of 10 individual whole water samples were collected; 0 of 10 samples exceeded the objective (1 ug/L). |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Merced Irrigation District, 2005-2008. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for atrazine is 0.001 mg/L (Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations ). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Livingston Canal (Merced County) was collected at 3 monitoring sites [Livingston Canal at Walnut Ave - 545MRDLWA, Livingston Canal at Winton Way - 545MRDLWW, Livingston Canal Spill to Merced R - 545MRDLCM] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 7/31/2007-9/16/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Glyphosate |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89550, Glyphosate
|
Region 5 |
Livingston Canal (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
66071 |
|
Pollutant: |
Glyphosate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
A total of 6 individual whole water samples were collected; 0 of 6 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline (700 ug/L). |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Merced Irrigation District, 2005-2008. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for Glyphosate is 700 ug/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Livingston Canal (Merced County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Livingston Canal Spill to Merced R - 545MRDLCM] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 7/31/2007-9/16/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Metolachlor |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89551, Metolachlor
|
Region 5 |
Livingston Canal (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
66073 |
|
Pollutant: |
Metolachlor |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Livingston Canal (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Metolachlor. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Merced Irrigation District, 2005-2008. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The National Ambient Water Quality criterion for Human Health and Welfare Protection of Public Health Effects (other than cancer effects) from Water & Fish Consumption for metolachlor is 44 µg/L. |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Livingston Canal (Merced County) was collected at 3 monitoring sites [Livingston Canal at Walnut Ave - 545MRDLWA, Livingston Canal at Winton Way - 545MRDLWW, Livingston Canal Spill to Merced R - 545MRDLCM] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 7/31/2007-9/16/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Molinate |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89552, Molinate
|
Region 5 |
Livingston Canal (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
66081 |
|
Pollutant: |
Molinate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Livingston Canal (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Molinate. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Merced Irrigation District, 2005-2008. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for Molinate is 20 ug/L . |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Livingston Canal (Merced County) was collected at 3 monitoring sites [Livingston Canal at Walnut Ave - 545MRDLWA, Livingston Canal at Winton Way - 545MRDLWW, Livingston Canal Spill to Merced R - 545MRDLCM] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 7/31/2007-9/16/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Simazine |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89553, Simazine
|
Region 5 |
Livingston Canal (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
66085 |
|
Pollutant: |
Simazine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Livingston Canal (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Simazine. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Merced Irrigation District, 2005-2008. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for Simazine is 4 ug/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Livingston Canal (Merced County) was collected at 3 monitoring sites [Livingston Canal at Walnut Ave - 545MRDLWA, Livingston Canal at Winton Way - 545MRDLWW, Livingston Canal Spill to Merced R - 545MRDLCM] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 7/31/2007-9/16/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89554, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 5 |
Livingston Canal (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
66069 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
11 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Livingston Canal (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 11 samples exceed the criterion for Conductivity(Us). |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Merced Irrigation District, 2005-2008. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California secondary maximum contaminant levels for electrical conductivity provide a range of values including a recommended level (900 uS/cm), an upper level (1,600 uS/cm) and a short-term level (2,200 uS/cm). The recommended level of 900 uS/cm was used as it is protective of all drinking water uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels and Compliance. CCR Title 22 section 64449. |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Livingston Canal (Merced County) was collected at 3 monitoring sites [Livingston Canal at Walnut Ave - 545MRDLWA, Livingston Canal at Winton Way - 545MRDLWW, Livingston Canal Spill to Merced R - 545MRDLCM] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 7/31/2007-9/16/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Thiobencarb/Bolero |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89555, Thiobencarb/Bolero
|
Region 5 |
Livingston Canal (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
66094 |
|
Pollutant: |
Thiobencarb/Bolero |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Livingston Canal (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Thiobencarb. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Merced Irrigation District, 2005-2008. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters designated for use as domestic or municipal supply (MUN) shall not contain concentrations of Thiobencarb in excess of 1.0 µg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Livingston Canal (Merced County) was collected at 3 monitoring sites [Livingston Canal at Walnut Ave - 545MRDLWA, Livingston Canal at Winton Way - 545MRDLWW, Livingston Canal Spill to Merced R - 545MRDLCM] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 7/31/2007-9/16/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Total Dissolved Solids |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89556, Total Dissolved Solids
|
Region 5 |
Livingston Canal (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
78529 |
|
Pollutant: |
Total Dissolved Solids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staff assessed ILRP data for Livingston Canal (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Dissolved Solids. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Merced Irrigation District, 2005-2008. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: At a minimum, water designated for MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the MCL specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. The secondary MCL for Total Dissolved Solids is 500 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Livingston Canal (Merced County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Livingston Canal Spill to Merced R - 545MRDLCM] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 7/31/2007-9/16/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
none |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|