Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 131577, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 5 |
Dinkey Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
232325 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 552DKC292 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 2 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.390001673 to 0.847946878. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2020 Integrated Report for Region 5.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Region 5 Basin Plan |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 552DKC292. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/27/2015 to 7/10/2018. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data collected following SWAMP QA protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 131577, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 5 |
Dinkey Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
232333 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 552PS0284 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 1.240293486 to 1.240293486. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2020 Integrated Report for Region 5.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Region 5 Basin Plan |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 552PS0284. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 8/29/2011 to 8/29/2011. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data collected following SWAMP QA protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 131577, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 5 |
Dinkey Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
232324 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 552DKC268 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 2 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.739690862 to 0.97. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2020 Integrated Report for Region 5.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Region 5 Basin Plan |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 552DKC268. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 6/23/2014 to 8/8/2017. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data collected following SWAMP QA protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 124057, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Dinkey Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
214730 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for Dinkey Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River and San Joaquin Basin: minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Third Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (552PS0284) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 124057, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Dinkey Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
214759 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
7 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB5 Monitoring data for Dinkey Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River and San Joaquin Basin: minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Third Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (552FRE020) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-07-02 and 2015-09-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 124057, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Dinkey Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
214641 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed USFS Management Indicator Species - Streams data for Dinkey Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River and San Joaquin Basin: minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Third Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (552DKC292) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-07-10 and 2018-07-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126485, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 5 |
Dinkey Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
214439 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for Dinkey Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Tulare Basin for specific conductance is 900 uS/cm. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Third Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (552PS0284) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126485, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 5 |
Dinkey Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
214383 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed USFS Management Indicator Species - Streams data for Dinkey Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Tulare Basin for specific conductance is 900 uS/cm. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Third Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (552DKC292) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-07-10 and 2018-07-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126485, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 5 |
Dinkey Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
214505 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
7 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB5 Monitoring data for Dinkey Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Tulare Basin for specific conductance is 900 uS/cm. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Third Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (552FRE020) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-07-02 and 2015-09-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 124059, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Dinkey Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
214816 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed USFS Management Indicator Species - Streams data for Dinkey Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Tulare Basin Plan). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Third Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (552DKC292) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-07-10 and 2018-07-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 124059, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Dinkey Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
214815 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
7 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB5 Monitoring data for Dinkey Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Tulare Basin Plan). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Third Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (552FRE020) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-07-02 and 2015-09-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 124059, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Dinkey Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
214602 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for Dinkey Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Tulare Basin Plan). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Third Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (552PS0284) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 124058, pH
|
Region 5 |
Dinkey Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
214711 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
7 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB5 Monitoring data for Dinkey Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Tulare Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Third Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (552FRE020) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-07-02 and 2015-09-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 124058, pH
|
Region 5 |
Dinkey Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
214458 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for Dinkey Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Tulare Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Third Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (552PS0284) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 124058, pH
|
Region 5 |
Dinkey Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
214735 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed USFS Management Indicator Species - Streams data for Dinkey Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Tulare Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Third Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (552DKC292) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-07-10 and 2018-07-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 124058, pH
|
Region 5 |
Dinkey Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
214490 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed USFS Management Indicator Species - Streams data for Dinkey Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Tulare Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Third Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (552DKC292) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-07-10 and 2018-07-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 124058, pH
|
Region 5 |
Dinkey Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
214467 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed USFS Management Indicator Species - Streams data for Dinkey Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Tulare Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Third Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (552DKC292) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-07-10 and 2018-07-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 124058, pH
|
Region 5 |
Dinkey Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
214615 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed USFS Management Indicator Species - Streams data for Dinkey Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Tulare Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Third Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (552DKC292) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-07-10 and 2018-07-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 124058, pH
|
Region 5 |
Dinkey Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
214520 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for Dinkey Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Tulare Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Third Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (552PS0284) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 124058, pH
|
Region 5 |
Dinkey Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
214649 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
7 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB5 Monitoring data for Dinkey Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Tulare Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Third Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (552FRE020) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-07-02 and 2015-09-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 124058, pH
|
Region 5 |
Dinkey Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
214616 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for Dinkey Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Tulare Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Third Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (552PS0284) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 124058, pH
|
Region 5 |
Dinkey Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
214743 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
7 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB5 Monitoring data for Dinkey Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Tulare Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Third Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (552FRE020) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-07-02 and 2015-09-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 124058, pH
|
Region 5 |
Dinkey Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
214462 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
7 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB5 Monitoring data for Dinkey Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Tulare Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Third Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (552FRE020) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-07-02 and 2015-09-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 124058, pH
|
Region 5 |
Dinkey Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
214424 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for Dinkey Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Tulare Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Third Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (552PS0284) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|