Pollutant: |
Nitrogen |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
|
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127499, Nitrogen
|
Region 9 |
Unnamed intermittent tributary to Temecula Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
144253 |
|
Pollutant: |
Total Nitrogen as N |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB9 Monitoring data for Unnamed intermittent tributary to Temecula Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrogen, Total. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Tissue, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus, by themselves or in combination with other nutrients, shall be maintained at levels below those which stimulate algae and emergent plant growth. A desired goal in order to prevent plant nuisance in streams and other flowing waters appears to be 0.1 mg/L total P. Analogous threshold values have not been set for nitrogen compounds; however, natural ratios of nitrogen to phosphorus are to be determined by surveillance and monitoring and upheld. If data are lacking, a ratio of N:P = 10:1, on a weight to weight basis shall be used (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (902WPPIO1) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-03-16 and 2012-03-16 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008, Nagoda and Busse, 2013. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Screening of Cyanotoxins in Lakes/Reservoirs and Coastal Wetlands in the San Diego Region, SWAMP QAPrP 2017 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 115013, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 9 |
Unnamed intermittent tributary to Temecula Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
144697 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB9 Monitoring data for Unnamed intermittent tributary to Temecula Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Tissue, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen levels shall not be less than 5.0 mg/l in inland surface waters with the WARM beneficial use designated (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (902WPPIO1) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-03-16 and 2012-03-16 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008, Nagoda and Busse, 2013. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Screening of Cyanotoxins in Lakes/Reservoirs and Coastal Wetlands in the San Diego Region, SWAMP QAPrP 2017 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Pollutant: |
Phosphorus |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
|
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 115014, Phosphorus
|
Region 9 |
Unnamed intermittent tributary to Temecula Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
146072 |
|
Pollutant: |
Phosphorus |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB9 Monitoring data for Unnamed intermittent tributary to Temecula Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Phosphorus as P. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Tissue, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus, by themselves or in combination with other nutrients, shall be maintained at levels below those which stimulate algae and emergent plant growth. A desired goal in order to prevent plant nuisance in streams and other flowing waters appears to be 0.1 mg/L total P. Analogous threshold values have not been set for nitrogen compounds; however, natural ratios of nitrogen to phosphorus are to be determined by surveillance and monitoring and upheld. If data are lacking, a ratio of N:P = 10:1, on a weight to weight basis shall be used (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (902WPPIO1) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-03-16 and 2012-03-16 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008, Nagoda and Busse, 2013. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Screening of Cyanotoxins in Lakes/Reservoirs and Coastal Wetlands in the San Diego Region, SWAMP QAPrP 2017 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
|
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127666, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 9 |
Unnamed intermittent tributary to Temecula Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
146827 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB9 Monitoring data for Unnamed intermittent tributary to Temecula Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Tissue, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water designated for use as domestic or municipal supply (MUN) shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant levels specified in Table 64449-A of section 64449 of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations (Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels, Consumer Acceptance Limits) which is incorporated by reference into this plan. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). The California Secondary MCL for specific conductance is 900 uS/cm (Title 22 California Code of Regulations). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (902WPPIO1) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-03-16 and 2012-03-16 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008, Nagoda and Busse, 2013. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Screening of Cyanotoxins in Lakes/Reservoirs and Coastal Wetlands in the San Diego Region, SWAMP QAPrP 2017 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Pollutant: |
Total Dissolved Solids |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
|
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 115015, Total Dissolved Solids
|
Region 9 |
Unnamed intermittent tributary to Temecula Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
147068 |
|
Pollutant: |
Total Dissolved Solids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB9 Monitoring data for Unnamed intermittent tributary to Temecula Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Total Dissolved Solids. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Tissue, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Dissolved Solids water quality threshold in this HSA is 500 mg/L, and this concentration is not to be exceeded more than 10% of the time during any one year period (Basin Plan, Table 3-2). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (902WPPIO1) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-03-16 and 2012-03-16 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008, Nagoda and Busse, 2013. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Screening of Cyanotoxins in Lakes/Reservoirs and Coastal Wetlands in the San Diego Region, SWAMP QAPrP 2017 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 115015, Total Dissolved Solids
|
Region 9 |
Unnamed intermittent tributary to Temecula Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
147323 |
|
Pollutant: |
Total Dissolved Solids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB9 Monitoring data for Unnamed intermittent tributary to Temecula Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Total Dissolved Solids. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Tissue, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Dissolved Solids water quality threshold in this HSA is 500 mg/L, and this concentration is not to be exceeded more than 10% of the time during any one year period (Basin Plan, Table 3-2). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (902WPPIO1) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-03-16 and 2012-03-16 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008, Nagoda and Busse, 2013. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Screening of Cyanotoxins in Lakes/Reservoirs and Coastal Wetlands in the San Diego Region, SWAMP QAPrP 2017 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 115015, Total Dissolved Solids
|
Region 9 |
Unnamed intermittent tributary to Temecula Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
147119 |
|
Pollutant: |
Total Dissolved Solids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB9 Monitoring data for Unnamed intermittent tributary to Temecula Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Total Dissolved Solids. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Tissue, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Dissolved Solids water quality threshold in this HSA is 500 mg/L, and this concentration is not to be exceeded more than 10% of the time during any one year period (Basin Plan, Table 3-2). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (902WPPIO1) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-03-16 and 2012-03-16 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008, Nagoda and Busse, 2013. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Screening of Cyanotoxins in Lakes/Reservoirs and Coastal Wetlands in the San Diego Region, SWAMP QAPrP 2017 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
|
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 115016, Turbidity
|
Region 9 |
Unnamed intermittent tributary to Temecula Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
147710 |
|
Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB9 Monitoring data for Unnamed intermittent tributary to Temecula Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Tissue, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Turbidity water quality threshold in this HSA is 20 NTU, and this level is not to be exceeded more than 10% of the time during any one year period (Basin Plan, Table 3-2). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (902WPPIO1) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-03-16 and 2012-03-16 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008, Nagoda and Busse, 2013. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Screening of Cyanotoxins in Lakes/Reservoirs and Coastal Wetlands in the San Diego Region, SWAMP QAPrP 2017 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 115016, Turbidity
|
Region 9 |
Unnamed intermittent tributary to Temecula Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
147456 |
|
Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB9 Monitoring data for Unnamed intermittent tributary to Temecula Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Tissue, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Secondary California Maximum Contaminant Level for Turbidity is 5 NTU (Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (902WPPIO1) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-03-16 and 2012-03-16 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP 2008, Nagoda and Busse, 2013. Quality Assurance Project Plan for Screening of Cyanotoxins in Lakes/Reservoirs and Coastal Wetlands in the San Diego Region, SWAMP QAPrP 2017 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|