Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 121431, Arsenic
|
Region 5 |
East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
186408 |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STLS Monitoring WY2017 data for East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Arsenic. |
Data Reference: |
Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Primary Maximum Contaminant Level for arsenic incorporated by reference in the Basin Plan is 0.010 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Eantioch) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-01-08 and 2017-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SFEI: Don Yee, Amy Franz, Adam Wong, John Ross, Philip Trowbridge |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plan for The Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 121431, Arsenic
|
Region 5 |
East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
186388 |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STLS Monitoring WY2017 data for East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Arsenic. |
Data Reference: |
Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved arsenic criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater for dissolved arsenic is 150 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Eantioch) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-01-08 and 2017-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SFEI: Don Yee, Amy Franz, Adam Wong, John Ross, Philip Trowbridge |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plan for The Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay. |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 121432, Cadmium
|
Region 5 |
East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
186776 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STLS Monitoring WY2017 data for East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cadmium. |
Data Reference: |
Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Primary Maximum Contaminant Level for cadmium incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 0.005 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Eantioch) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-01-08 and 2017-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SFEI: Don Yee, Amy Franz, Adam Wong, John Ross, Philip Trowbridge |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plan for The Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 121432, Cadmium
|
Region 5 |
East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
186735 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STLS Monitoring WY2017 data for East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cadmium. |
Data Reference: |
Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The criterion in freshwater is hardness dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness dependent formula for the metals criterion. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Eantioch) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-01-08 and 2017-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SFEI: Don Yee, Amy Franz, Adam Wong, John Ross, Philip Trowbridge |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plan for The Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay. |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 121433, Copper
|
Region 5 |
East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
187881 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STLS Monitoring WY2017 data for East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Copper. |
Data Reference: |
Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level for copper incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 1.0 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Eantioch) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-01-08 and 2017-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SFEI: Don Yee, Amy Franz, Adam Wong, John Ross, Philip Trowbridge |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plan for The Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 121433, Copper
|
Region 5 |
East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
187656 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STLS Monitoring WY2017 data for East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Copper. |
Data Reference: |
Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The criterion in freshwater is hardness dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness dependent formula for the metals criterion. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Eantioch) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-01-08 and 2017-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SFEI: Don Yee, Amy Franz, Adam Wong, John Ross, Philip Trowbridge |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plan for The Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay. |
|
Pollutant: |
Lead |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 121434, Lead
|
Region 5 |
East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
190804 |
|
Pollutant: |
Lead |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STLS Monitoring WY2017 data for East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead. |
Data Reference: |
Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The criterion in freshwater is hardness dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness dependent formula for the metals criterion. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Eantioch) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-01-08 and 2017-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SFEI: Don Yee, Amy Franz, Adam Wong, John Ross, Philip Trowbridge |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plan for The Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 121434, Lead
|
Region 5 |
East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
190746 |
|
Pollutant: |
Lead |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STLS Monitoring WY2017 data for East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead. |
Data Reference: |
Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: At a minimum, water designated for use as MUN shall not contain lead in excess of 0.015 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Eantioch) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-01-08 and 2017-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SFEI: Don Yee, Amy Franz, Adam Wong, John Ross, Philip Trowbridge |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plan for The Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay. |
|
Pollutant: |
Mercury |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
|
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 130913, Mercury
|
Region 5 |
East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
190984 |
|
Pollutant: |
Mercury |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STLS Monitoring WY2017 data for East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Mercury. |
Data Reference: |
Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The mercury criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.051 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Eantioch) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-01-08 and 2017-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SFEI: Don Yee, Amy Franz, Adam Wong, John Ross, Philip Trowbridge |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plan for The Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 130913, Mercury
|
Region 5 |
East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
191126 |
|
Pollutant: |
Mercury |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STLS Monitoring WY2017 data for East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Mercury. |
Data Reference: |
Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The mercury criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.050 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Eantioch) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-01-08 and 2017-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SFEI: Don Yee, Amy Franz, Adam Wong, John Ross, Philip Trowbridge |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plan for The Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 130913, Mercury
|
Region 5 |
East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
191003 |
|
Pollutant: |
Mercury |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STLS Monitoring WY2017 data for East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Mercury. |
Data Reference: |
Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria Continuous Concentrations (4-day average concentrations) for freshwater aquatic organisms exposure to total mercury is 0.77 ug/L. |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Eantioch) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-01-08 and 2017-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SFEI: Don Yee, Amy Franz, Adam Wong, John Ross, Philip Trowbridge |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plan for The Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay. |
|
Pollutant: |
Selenium |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 121435, Selenium
|
Region 5 |
East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
193576 |
|
Pollutant: |
Selenium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STLS Monitoring WY2017 data for East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Selenium. |
Data Reference: |
Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The selenium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 5 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Eantioch) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-01-08 and 2017-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SFEI: Don Yee, Amy Franz, Adam Wong, John Ross, Philip Trowbridge |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plan for The Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 121435, Selenium
|
Region 5 |
East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
193453 |
|
Pollutant: |
Selenium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STLS Monitoring WY2017 data for East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Selenium. |
Data Reference: |
Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Primary Maximum Contaminant Level for selenium incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 0.05 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Eantioch) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-01-08 and 2017-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SFEI: Don Yee, Amy Franz, Adam Wong, John Ross, Philip Trowbridge |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plan for The Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay. |
|
Pollutant: |
Zinc |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 121436, Zinc
|
Region 5 |
East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
194369 |
|
Pollutant: |
Zinc |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STLS Monitoring WY2017 data for East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Zinc. |
Data Reference: |
Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level for zinc incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 5.0 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Eantioch) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-01-08 and 2017-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SFEI: Don Yee, Amy Franz, Adam Wong, John Ross, Philip Trowbridge |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plan for The Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 121436, Zinc
|
Region 5 |
East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
194394 |
|
Pollutant: |
Zinc |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STLS Monitoring WY2017 data for East Antioch Creek (in Delta Waterways, western portion) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Zinc. |
Data Reference: |
Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The criterion in freshwater is hardness dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness dependent formula for the metals criterion. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Eantioch) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-01-08 and 2017-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SFEI: Don Yee, Amy Franz, Adam Wong, John Ross, Philip Trowbridge |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plan for The Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay. |
|