Pollutant: |
Selenium |
Final Listing Decision: |
Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Reason for Delisting: |
Delisting due to spatial change or other CalWQA administrative reason |
Expected TMDL Completion Date: |
2019 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
This pollutant is being considered for removal from the CWA section 303(d) List under section 4.1 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
This waterbody was recently split for assessment purposes and this section of the waterbody is now represented by just one sample. This sample size is not sufficient to determine beneficial use support with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification for removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List.
This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. One of one sample exceeded the water quality threshold, and this sample size is insufficient to determine beneficial use support with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are not being exceeded. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105666, Selenium
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134564 |
|
Pollutant: |
Selenium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Selenium. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The selenium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.005 mg/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105666, Selenium
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134565 |
|
Pollutant: |
Selenium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Selenium. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Maximum Contaminant Level for selenium in the Basin Plan is 0.05 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105648, Arsenic
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134533 |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Arsenic. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved arsenic criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater for dissolved arsenic is 0.150 mg/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105648, Arsenic
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134532 |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Arsenic. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (SDRWQCB 2007): All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity for sediment-dwelling organisms) for arsenic is 33 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105649, Bifenthrin
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134535 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Bifenthrin. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
UC Davis Aquatic Life Criteria: Aquatic life should not be affected unacceptably if the 4-day average concentration of Bifenthrin does not exceed 0.0006 ug/L. |
Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic life water quality criteria derived via the UC Davis method: ll. Pyrethroid insecticides. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 216:51-103. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105650, Cadmium
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134537 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Cadmium. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for cadmium is 0.005 mg/L (Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105650, Cadmium
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134538 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Cadmium. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations for dissolved Cadmium to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The dissolved Cadmium criterion in freshwater is hardness dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness dependent formula for the metals criterion. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105650, Cadmium
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134536 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Cadmium. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (SDRWQCB 2007): All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity for sediment-dwelling organisms) for cadmium is 4.98 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105633, Deltamethrin
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
227658 |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the water quality threshold for Deltamethrin. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in the water column, sediments or biota at concentration(s) that adversely affect beneficial uses. Pesticides shall not be present at levels which will bioaccumulate in aquatic organisms to levels which are harmful to human health, wildlife or aquatic organisms (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.0041 ug/L for a invertebrate (acute). |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs was collected at 1 monitoring site [Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. One of one sample exceeds the objective for the COLD beneficial use, and zero of one sample exceeds the objective for the WARM beneficial use.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List.
This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. One of one sample exceeds the objective for COLD and zero of one sample exceeds the objective for WARM, and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 26 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.2. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105663, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134561 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin, Cold Water Habitat Objective, Chapter III, General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: The dissolved oxygen concentration for cold water habitats shall not be reduced below 8.0 mg/l at any time. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105663, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134560 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin, Warm Water Habitat Objective, Chapter III, General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: The dissolved oxygen concentration for warm water habitats shall not be reduced below 5.0 mg/l at any time. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105644, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134525 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Alkalinity as CaCO3 criteria for the protection of freshwater aquatic life is 20000 ug/L (National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2009). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Aluminum |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105645, Aluminum
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134526 |
|
Pollutant: |
Aluminum |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Aluminum. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual chemical or combination of chemicals shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Secondary MCL for aluminum is 0.2 mg/L (Title 22 California Code of Regulations). |
Guideline Reference: |
Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels and Compliance. CCR Title 22 section 64449. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105645, Aluminum
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134528 |
|
Pollutant: |
Aluminum |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Aluminum. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The National Recommended Water Quality Critiera for the protection of aquatic life from aluminum is the chronic continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) of 87 ug/L. |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105645, Aluminum
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134527 |
|
Pollutant: |
Aluminum |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Aluminum. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The National Recommended Water Quality Critiera for the protection of aquatic life from aluminum is the chronic continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) of 87 ug/L. |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic Community Effects |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Benthic Community Effects are being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 3.9 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.9, additional lines of evidence (LOEs) associating the Benthic Community Effects decision with a water or sediment concentration of pollutants other than benthic-macroinvertebrate bioassessment or habitat assessment LOEs are necessary to place a water body on the 303(d) List for Benthic Community Effects.
One line(s) of evidence evaluating benthic-macroinvertebrate bioassessment data is/are available in the administrative record to assess this indicator. Zero of one benthic-macroinvertebrate samples exceed the California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) impairment threshold. These data indicate that the waterbody is likely unimpaired for Benthic Community Effects and therefore no other pollutant LOEs need be associated with this decision at this time.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing Benthic Community Effects in this waterbody segment on the CWA section 303(d) List.
This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of one benthic-macroinvertebrate bioassessment samples had CSCI scores below 0.79. Therefore, this water body is not exceeding the water quality threshold for the protection of the COLD beneficial use. The available information indicates that the waterbody/pollutant combination should not be placed on the 303(d) List of impaired waters at this time. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105631, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134585 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
One sample was collected at one station on Cottonwood Creek (911HU). The CSCI score for this site is above the 0.79 threshold, and is therefore not exceeding the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
Region 9 CSCI Scores & Water Body Information |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant or animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analysis of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board. Region 9 Basin Plan. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rhen, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
The sample station: 911S04086 |
Temporal Representation: |
The sample was collected 2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Samples were collected for the SWAMP RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 following SWAMP protocols and stored in the SWAMP database. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
e-mail clarifying QAPP information |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105652, Chloride
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134541 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The recommended secondary maximum contamination level acceptable to consumers of drinking water is 250 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels and Compliance. CCR Title 22 section 64449. |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105652, Chloride
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134542 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (SDRWQCB 2007): Table 3-2 lists objectives by Hydrologic Unit, Hydrologic Area, and Hydrologic Sub-area. The Chloride objective for the protection of aquatic life according to Table 3-2 for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) within the Tijuana Hydrologic Unit is 250 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Chromium |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105654, Chromium
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134544 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chromium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Chromium. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (SDRWQCB 2007): All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity for sediment-dwelling organisms) for chromium is 111 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105654, Chromium
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134546 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chromium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Chromium. Since the chromium species was not identified, the data point(s) were assessed using both the Chromium III criteria which is hardness-dependent, and the criterion continuous concentration (4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater for chromium VI which is 11 ug/L and is not hardness dependent. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations for dissolved chromium to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The dissolved Chromium criterion in freshwater is hardness dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness dependent formula for the metals criterion. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105654, Chromium
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134545 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chromium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Chromium. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for total chromium is 0.05 mg/L (Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105655, Copper
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134547 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Copper. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (SDRWQCB 2007): All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity for sediment-dwelling organisms) for copper is 149 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105655, Copper
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134549 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Copper. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations for dissolved copper to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The dissolved copper criterion in freshwater is hardness dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness dependent formula for the metals criterion. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105655, Copper
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134548 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Copper. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL for copper is 1.0 mg/L (Title 22 California Code of Regulations). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels and Compliance. CCR Title 22 section 64449. |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105657, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134552 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Cyfluthrin, total. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
UC Davis Aquatic Life Criteria: Aquatic life should not be affected unacceptably if the 4-day average concentration of lambda-cyhalothrin does not exceed 0.0005 ug/L and if the 1-h average concentration does not exceed 0.001 ug/L. Mixtures of lambda-cyhalothrin and other pyrethroids should be considered in an additive manner. (Fojut et al. 2012) |
Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic life water quality criteria derived via the UC Davis method: ll. Pyrethroid insecticides. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 216:51-103. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105658, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134553 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Cyhalothrin, lambda, total. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
UC Davis Aquatic Life Criteria: Aquatic life should not be affected unacceptably if the 4-day average concentration of Cyhalothrin, lambda, total does not exceed 0.0005 ug/L. |
Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic life water quality criteria derived via the UC Davis method: ll. Pyrethroid insecticides. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 216:51-103. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105632, Cypermethrin
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134508 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
One of one sample result was not used in the assessment because the laboratory data was non-detect and the method detection limit was above the guideline and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
UC Davis Aquatic Life Criteria: Aquatic life should not be affected unacceptably if the 4-day average concentration of cypermethrin does not exceed 0.0002 ug/L and if the 1-h average concentration does not exceed 0.001 ug/L. Fojut et al. 2012) |
Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic life water quality criteria derived via the UC Davis method: ll. Pyrethroid insecticides. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 216:51-103. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105636, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134512 |
|
Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate, total. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
According to the USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database, the aquatic life EC50 for Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate is 0.9 ug/L. |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Fenpropathrin |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105637, Fenpropathrin
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
227659 |
|
Pollutant: |
Fenpropathrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the water quality threshold for Fenpropathrin. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in the water column, sediments or biota at concentration(s) that adversely affect beneficial uses. Pesticides shall not be present at levels which will bioaccumulate in aquatic organisms to levels which are harmful to human health, wildlife or aquatic organisms (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for Fenpropathrin is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.06 ug/L for a fish (chronic). |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs was collected at 1 monitoring site [Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Iron |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105638, Iron
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134516 |
|
Pollutant: |
Iron |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Iron. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (SDRWQCB 2007): Table 3-2 lists objectives by Hydrologic Unit, Hydrologic Area, and Hydrologic Sub-area. The Iron objective for the protection of aquatic life according to Table 3-2 for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) within the Tijuana Hydrologic Unit is 0.3 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105638, Iron
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134515 |
|
Pollutant: |
Iron |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Iron. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL for iron is 0.3 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Lead |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105639, Lead
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134517 |
|
Pollutant: |
Lead |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Lead. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (SDRWQCB 2007): All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity for sediment-dwelling organisms) for lead is 128 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105639, Lead
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134518 |
|
Pollutant: |
Lead |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Lead. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations for dissolved lead to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The dissolved lead criterion in freshwater is hardness dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness dependent formula for the metals criterion. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Manganese |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105642, Manganese
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134522 |
|
Pollutant: |
Manganese |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Manganese. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (SDRWQCB 2007): Table 3-2 lists objectives by Hydrologic Unit, Hydrologic Area, and Hydrologic Sub-area. The Manganese objective for the protection of aquatic life according to Table 3-2 for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) within the Tijuana Hydrologic Unit is 0.05 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105642, Manganese
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134523 |
|
Pollutant: |
Manganese |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Manganese. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL for manganese is 0.05 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels and Compliance. CCR Title 22 section 64449. |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105643, Nickel
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134555 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Nickel. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations for dissolved Nickel to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The dissolved Nickel criterion in freshwater is hardness dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness dependent formula for the metals criterion. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105643, Nickel
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134554 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Nickel. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nickel is 0.1 mg/L (Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105643, Nickel
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134524 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Nickel. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (SDRWQCB 2007): All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity for sediment-dwelling organisms) for nickel is 48.6 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105659, Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134556 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate/Nitrite as N. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate + nitrite (as N) is 10.0 mg/L (Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrite |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105661, Nitrogen, Nitrite
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134558 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrite |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrite as N. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrite (as N) is 1.0 mg/L (Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105646, Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia)
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134529 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia as N, Total. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia – Freshwater (USEPA 2013): the 30-day rolling average concentration (criterion continuous concentration or CCC) of total ammonia nitrogen(in mg TAN/L) in freshwater are not to be exceeded more than once every three years on average. The CCC values are based on pH and temperature. The CCC formula is found on page 46 and the table of CCC values is on page 49. |
Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105646, Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia)
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134530 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia As N, Total. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Basin Plan: No individual chemical or combination of chemicals shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
EPA's Lifetime Health advisory level for total ammonia is 30.0 mg/L as stated on page 8 of the 2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. This Advisory Level is defined as "the concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse noncarcinogenic effects for up to ten days of exposure." |
Guideline Reference: |
2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. EPA 822-R-03-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Silver |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105667, Silver
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134567 |
|
Pollutant: |
Silver |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Silver. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations for dissolved Silver to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The dissolved Silver criterion in freshwater is hardness dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness dependent formula for the metals criterion. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105667, Silver
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134566 |
|
Pollutant: |
Silver |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Silver. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual chemical or combination of chemicals shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Secondary MCL for silver is 0.1 mg/L (Title 22 California Code of Regulations). |
Guideline Reference: |
Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels and Compliance. CCR Title 22 section 64449. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105668, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134568 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Conductivity(Us). |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual chemical or combination of chemicals shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Secondary MCL for specific conductance is 900 uS/cm (Title 22 California Code of Regulations). |
Guideline Reference: |
Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels and Compliance. CCR Title 22 section 64449. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Sulfates |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105669, Sulfates
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134569 |
|
Pollutant: |
Sulfates |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Sulfate. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual chemical or combination of chemicals shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Secondary MCL for sulfate is 250 mg/L (Title 22 California Code of Regulations). |
Guideline Reference: |
Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels and Compliance. CCR Title 22 section 64449. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105669, Sulfates
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134570 |
|
Pollutant: |
Sulfates |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Sulfate. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (SDRWQCB 2007): Table 3-2 lists objectives by Hydrologic Unit, Hydrologic Area, and Hydrologic Sub-area. The Sulfate objective for the protection of aquatic life according to Table 3-2 for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) within the Tijuana Hydrologic Unit is 250 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105670, Temperature, water
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134571 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Water Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. At no time or place shall the temperature of any COLD water be increased more than 5°F above the natural receiving water temperature. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Total Dissolved Solids |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105671, Total Dissolved Solids
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134574 |
|
Pollutant: |
Total Dissolved Solids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Dissolved Solids. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (SDRWQCB 2007): Table 3-2 lists objectives by Hydrologic Unit, Hydrologic Area, and Hydrologic Sub-area. The Dissolved Solids objective for the protection of aquatic life according to Table 3-2 for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) within the Tijuana Hydrologic Unit is 500 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105671, Total Dissolved Solids
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134573 |
|
Pollutant: |
Total Dissolved Solids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Dissolved Solids. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual chemical or combination of chemicals shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Secondary MCL for Dissolved Solids is 500 mg/L (Title 22 California Code of Regulations). |
Guideline Reference: |
Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels and Compliance. CCR Title 22 section 64449. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105672, Toxicity
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134575 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
One sample was collected to evaluate water toxicity. The sample did not exhibit significant toxicity. The toxicity test included survival and reproduction of Ceriodaphnia dubia. One sample can have multiple toxicity test results but will be counted only once. One sample is defined as being collected on the same day at the same location with the same lab sample id (if provided). |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Region 9 Basin Plan. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Toxicity is defined as a statistically significant effect in the sample exposure compared to the control using EPA-recommended hypothesis testing. For SWAMP data exceedances are counted with the significant effect code SL, Significant compared to negative control based on statistical test, less than stated alpha level, AND less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met). |
Guideline Reference: |
Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater and Marine Organisms, Fifth Edition. EPA-821-R-02-012 |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
Guideline Reference: |
SWAMP_Memo_Toxicity_Data_Intrepretation |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The sample was collected at station 911S04086. |
Temporal Representation: |
The sample was collected in May 2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data quality is good. Data results were recorded in the SWAMP database and followed SWAMP protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105673, Turbidity
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134576 |
|
Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU). |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (SDRWQCB 2007): Table 3-2 lists objectives by Hydrologic Unit, Hydrologic Area, and Hydrologic Sub-area. The Turbidity(NTU) objective for the protection of aquatic life according to Table 3-2 for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) within the Tijuana Hydrologic Unit is 20 NTU. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
Zinc |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105674, Zinc
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134577 |
|
Pollutant: |
Zinc |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Zinc. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (SDRWQCB 2007): All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity for sediment-dwelling organisms) for zinc is 459 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105674, Zinc
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134580 |
|
Pollutant: |
Zinc |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Zinc. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations for dissolved Zinc to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The dissolved Zinc criterion in freshwater is hardness dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness dependent formula for the metals criterion. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105674, Zinc
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134578 |
|
Pollutant: |
Zinc |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Zinc. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual chemical or combination of chemicals shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Secondary MCL for zinc is 5.0 mg/L (Title 22 California Code of Regulations). |
Guideline Reference: |
Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels and Compliance. CCR Title 22 section 64449. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 105665, pH
|
Region 9 |
Cottonwood Creek between Barrett and Morena Reservoirs |
|
|
LOE ID: |
134563 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
RWB9 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2009 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
In inland surface waters the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Cottonwood Creek (Tijuana River watershed) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Cottonwood Creek ~0.7mi below Hauser Cr. - 911S04086] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/6/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|