Water Body Name: | Rhine Channel |
Water Body ID: | CAB8011400020050201172510 |
Water Body Type: | Bay & Harbor |
DECISION ID |
72339 |
Region 8 |
Rhine Channel |
||
Pollutant: | Chlordane |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | There was no new data considered in the 2014 Listing Cycle, this previously made decision will carryover. The following description applies to an earlier Listing Cycle.
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.5 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Five lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Although sediment toxicity is exhibited in the water body, none of the sediment samples exceeded the guideline. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Although a large number of sediment samples exhibited toxicity to amphipods, none of the sediment samples exceeded the sediment quality guideline for chlordane, and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current. The decision has not changed. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 311 | ||||
Pollutant: | Chlordane | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Chemical monitoring of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | One of 2 samples exceeded the guideline (Phillips et al. 1998). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The sediment quality guideline is 6 ppb dry weight. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Rhine Channel. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | |||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | BPTCP QAPP. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 312 | ||||
Pollutant: | Chlordane | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 15 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Chemical monitoring of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of 15 samples exceeded the guideline (Bay and Brown, 2003). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The sediment quality guideline is 6 ppb dry weight. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Rhine Channel. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | 2003. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 310 | ||||
Pollutant: | Chlordane | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Chemical monitoring of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | One sample was collected in May 2001 and was not in exceedance of the ERM guideline (Bay et al. 2004). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | An applicable sediment guideline is not available for alpha chlordane alone but an ERM for total chlordane of 6 ng/g dw is applicable for the protection of aquatic life. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The sample was collected at station NB3. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The sample was collected in May 2001. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 313 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | One of 1 site in Rhine Channel exhibited sediment toxicity to amphipods, porewater toxicity to purple urchin larval development, and a transitional benthic community status (Phillips et al. 1998). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Rhine Channel | ||||
Temporal Representation: | 1994-1997. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | BPTCP QAPP. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 314 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 30 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 21 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Eleven of 15 sites had toxicity to amphipods. Ten of 15 samples had sediment-water interface toxicity (Bay and Brown, 2003a). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Rhine Channel. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | 2003. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
69797 |
Region 8 |
Rhine Channel |
||
Pollutant: | PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons) |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | There was no new data considered in the 2014 Listing Cycle, this previously made decision will carryover. The following description applies to an earlier Listing Cycle.
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The sediment quality guideline used complies with the requirements of section 6.1.3 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 3.The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 4. None of 4 samples exceeded the sediment quality guideline. These samples do not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 5. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current. The decision has not changed. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 308 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 4 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 2 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Toxicity Results: One of 1 sediment sample was significantly toxic to amphipods. None of 1 pore water sample collected exhibited significant effect in Sea Urchin fertilization. None of 1 pore water sample collected exhibited significant effect on Mysid growth. One of 1 sediment-water interface sample was significantly toxic to Sea Urchin fertilization (Bay et al. 2004). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were taken at station NB3. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected in May 2001. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 306 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 15 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 11 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Eleven of 15 samples exhibited significant toxicity to Amphipods. In fact, one sample from station RC 5 had marginal toxicity and 10 samples collected from RC6 to RC15 had high toxicity (Bay and Greenstein, 2003). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from 15 stations in Rhine Channel, Newport Bay. These stations were distributed throughout the study area. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on May 14, 2002. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP was used. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 307 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 15 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 10 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Ten of 15 samples exhibited significant toxicity effect to sea urchin development test in the sediment-water interface from stations RC2, RC3, RC4, RC7, RC8, RC9, RC11, RC12, RC13, and RC 14. In fact, all samples exhibited high toxicity (BPTCP, 1998). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from stations RC1 - RC15 in Rhine Channel, Newport Bay. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on May 14, 2002. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP was used. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 305 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 6 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 6 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Toxicity Results (Bay and Greenstein, 2003). Two of 2 sediment samples were significantly toxic to amphipods. Two of 2 pore water samples collected exhibited significant effect in Purple Urchin larval development. One of 1 sediment-water interface samples was significantly toxic to Purple Sea Urchin. One of 1 sample exhibited significant toxic effect to Ampelisca. | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: Toxic substances. The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments, biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from one site in Newport Bay-Rhine Channel. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | One sample was collected in September 1994 and June 1996. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Study was conducted by the California Department of Fish and Game.QA/QC information is contained in the document. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 304 | ||||
Pollutant: | PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 4 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Chemical monitoring of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of 4 samples exceeded the sediment quality guideline (Bay and Greenstein, 2003). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentration of toxic substance in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The sediment quality guideline for total PAHs is 1800 ug/g (ppm) dry weight (Fairey et al., 2001). | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from the Rhine Channel at stations NB3, NB11, and NB12. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | One sample was collected in November 2001 from station NB3. Three samples were collected on March 2002 from stations NB3, NB11, and NB12. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP was used. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
73002 |
Region 8 |
Rhine Channel |
||
Pollutant: | Copper |
Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Sources: | A Source Unknown |
Expected TMDL Completion Date: | 2019 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | There was no new data considered in the 2014 Listing Cycle, this previously made decision will carryover. The following description applies to an earlier Listing Cycle.
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Multiple lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant including water, tissue and/or sediment data. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The sediment quality guideline used complies with the requirements of section 2.1.3 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 3. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 4. Sixteen of 17 samples exceeded the dry weight ERM sediment quality guideline, and 12 of 18 samples exceeded the CTR saltwater chronic. Sediment toxicity has been documented in this water body and this pollutant could cause or contribute to the toxic effect. These samples exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 5. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current. The decision has not changed. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 306 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 15 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 11 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Eleven of 15 samples exhibited significant toxicity to Amphipods. In fact, one sample from station RC 5 had marginal toxicity and 10 samples collected from RC6 to RC15 had high toxicity (Bay and Greenstein, 2003). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from 15 stations in Rhine Channel, Newport Bay. These stations were distributed throughout the study area. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on May 14, 2002. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP was used. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 308 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 4 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 2 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Toxicity Results: One of 1 sediment sample was significantly toxic to amphipods. None of 1 pore water sample collected exhibited significant effect in Sea Urchin fertilization. None of 1 pore water sample collected exhibited significant effect on Mysid growth. One of 1 sediment-water interface sample was significantly toxic to Sea Urchin fertilization (Bay et al. 2004). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were taken at station NB3. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected in May 2001. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 301 | ||||
Pollutant: | Copper | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 15 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 9 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Nine of 15 samples exceeded the CTR criteria. Samples were collected from the sediment-water interface. Samples exceeding were from station RC1, RC7, RC8, RC9, RC10, RC11, RC12, and RC12 (Bay and Greenstein, 2003). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The CTR chronic saltwater criteria for copper is 3.1 ug/L (ppb) (USEPA, 2000).
The concentration of toxic substance in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). |
||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from 15 stations in Rhine Channel, Newport Bay. These stations were distributed throughout the study area. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on May 14, 2002 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP was used. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 299 | ||||
Pollutant: | Copper | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 3 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 3 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Three of 3 samples exceeded the CTR criterion. Two of the samples were collected in the water column and one sample was collected in the sediment water interface (Bay and Greenstein, 2003). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The CTR chronic saltwater criteria for copper is 3.1 ug/L (ppb) (USEPA, 2000).
The concentration of toxic substance in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). |
||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at one site (NB3) in the Rhine Channel. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Two samples were collected in November 2001 (one from the water column and one from the sediment water interface). One water column sample was collected in March 2002. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP was used. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 300 | ||||
Pollutant: | Copper | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 15 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 14 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Chemical monitoring of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Fourteen of 15 samples exceeded the ERM. Samples that exceeded the ERM were collected from stations RC1 - RC14 (Bay and Greenstein, 2003). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentration of toxic substance in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The ERM sediment quality guideline for copper is 270 ug/g (ppm) dry weight (Long et al., 1995). | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from 15 stations in Rhine Channel, Newport Bay. These stations were distributed throughout the study area. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on May 14, 2002. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP was used. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 298 | ||||
Pollutant: | Copper | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 2 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Chemical monitoring of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Two of 2 samples exceeded the ERM guideline (Bay and Greenstein, 2003). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentration of toxic substance in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The ERM sediment quality guideline for copper is 270 ug/g (ppm) dry weight (Long et al., 1995). | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at one site (NB3) in the Rhine Channel. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected in November 2001 and March 2002. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP was used. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 305 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 6 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 6 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Toxicity Results (Bay and Greenstein, 2003). Two of 2 sediment samples were significantly toxic to amphipods. Two of 2 pore water samples collected exhibited significant effect in Purple Urchin larval development. One of 1 sediment-water interface samples was significantly toxic to Purple Sea Urchin. One of 1 sample exhibited significant toxic effect to Ampelisca. | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: Toxic substances. The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments, biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from one site in Newport Bay-Rhine Channel. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | One sample was collected in September 1994 and June 1996. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Study was conducted by the California Department of Fish and Game.QA/QC information is contained in the document. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 307 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 15 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 10 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Ten of 15 samples exhibited significant toxicity effect to sea urchin development test in the sediment-water interface from stations RC2, RC3, RC4, RC7, RC8, RC9, RC11, RC12, RC13, and RC 14. In fact, all samples exhibited high toxicity (BPTCP, 1998). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from stations RC1 - RC15 in Rhine Channel, Newport Bay. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on May 14, 2002. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP was used. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
68793 |
Region 8 |
Rhine Channel |
||
Pollutant: | Lead |
Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Sources: | A Source Unknown |
Expected TMDL Completion Date: | 2019 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | There was no new data considered in the 2014 Listing Cycle, this previously made decision will carryover. The following description applies to an earlier Listing Cycle.
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings: 1. The sediment quality guideline used complies with the requirements of section 6.1.3 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 3. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 4. Nine of 15 samples exceeded the dry weight PEL sediment quality guideline. Sediment toxicity was documented and the pollutant could cause or contribute to the toxic effect. These samples exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 5. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current. The decision has not changed. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 303 | ||||
Pollutant: | Lead | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 15 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 9 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Chemical monitoring of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Nine of 15 samples exceeded the PEL criteria. Samples were collected from the sediment-water interface. Samples exceeding were from stations RC3, RC4, RC5, RC6, RC7, RC8, RC9, and RC13 (Bay and Greenstein, 2003). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentration of toxic substance in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The PEL sediment quality guideline for lead is 112.2 ug/g (ppm) dry weight (MacDonald et al., 1996). | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from 15 stations in Rhine Channel, Newport Bay. These stations were distributed throughout the study area. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on May 14, 2002. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP was used. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 306 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 15 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 11 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Eleven of 15 samples exhibited significant toxicity to Amphipods. In fact, one sample from station RC 5 had marginal toxicity and 10 samples collected from RC6 to RC15 had high toxicity (Bay and Greenstein, 2003). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from 15 stations in Rhine Channel, Newport Bay. These stations were distributed throughout the study area. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on May 14, 2002. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP was used. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 305 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 6 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 6 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Toxicity Results (Bay and Greenstein, 2003). Two of 2 sediment samples were significantly toxic to amphipods. Two of 2 pore water samples collected exhibited significant effect in Purple Urchin larval development. One of 1 sediment-water interface samples was significantly toxic to Purple Sea Urchin. One of 1 sample exhibited significant toxic effect to Ampelisca. | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: Toxic substances. The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments, biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from one site in Newport Bay-Rhine Channel. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | One sample was collected in September 1994 and June 1996. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Study was conducted by the California Department of Fish and Game.QA/QC information is contained in the document. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 308 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 4 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 2 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Toxicity Results: One of 1 sediment sample was significantly toxic to amphipods. None of 1 pore water sample collected exhibited significant effect in Sea Urchin fertilization. None of 1 pore water sample collected exhibited significant effect on Mysid growth. One of 1 sediment-water interface sample was significantly toxic to Sea Urchin fertilization (Bay et al. 2004). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were taken at station NB3. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected in May 2001. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 307 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 15 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 10 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Ten of 15 samples exhibited significant toxicity effect to sea urchin development test in the sediment-water interface from stations RC2, RC3, RC4, RC7, RC8, RC9, RC11, RC12, RC13, and RC 14. In fact, all samples exhibited high toxicity (BPTCP, 1998). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from stations RC1 - RC15 in Rhine Channel, Newport Bay. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on May 14, 2002. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP was used. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
68923 |
Region 8 |
Rhine Channel |
||
Pollutant: | Mercury |
Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Sources: | A Source Unknown |
Expected TMDL Completion Date: | 2019 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | There was no new data considered in the 2014 Listing Cycle, this previously made decision will carryover. The following description applies to an earlier Listing Cycle.
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The sediment quality guideline used complies with the requirements of section 6.1.3 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 3. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 4. Fifteen of 15 samples exceeded the sediment quality guideline. Sediment toxicity was documented in this water body and the pollutant could cause or contribute to the toxic effect. These samples exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 5. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current. The decision has not changed. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 306 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 15 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 11 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Eleven of 15 samples exhibited significant toxicity to Amphipods. In fact, one sample from station RC 5 had marginal toxicity and 10 samples collected from RC6 to RC15 had high toxicity (Bay and Greenstein, 2003). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from 15 stations in Rhine Channel, Newport Bay. These stations were distributed throughout the study area. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on May 14, 2002. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP was used. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 305 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 6 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 6 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Toxicity Results (Bay and Greenstein, 2003). Two of 2 sediment samples were significantly toxic to amphipods. Two of 2 pore water samples collected exhibited significant effect in Purple Urchin larval development. One of 1 sediment-water interface samples was significantly toxic to Purple Sea Urchin. One of 1 sample exhibited significant toxic effect to Ampelisca. | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: Toxic substances. The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments, biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from one site in Newport Bay-Rhine Channel. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | One sample was collected in September 1994 and June 1996. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Study was conducted by the California Department of Fish and Game.QA/QC information is contained in the document. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 307 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 15 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 10 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Ten of 15 samples exhibited significant toxicity effect to sea urchin development test in the sediment-water interface from stations RC2, RC3, RC4, RC7, RC8, RC9, RC11, RC12, RC13, and RC 14. In fact, all samples exhibited high toxicity (BPTCP, 1998). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from stations RC1 - RC15 in Rhine Channel, Newport Bay. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on May 14, 2002. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP was used. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 302 | ||||
Pollutant: | Mercury | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 15 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 15 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Chemical monitoring of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Fifteen of 15 samples exceeded the sediment quality guideline. Samples were collected from station RC1 - RC15 (Bay and Greenstein, 2003). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentration of toxic substance in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The sediment quality guideline for mercury is 2.1 µg/g (ppm) (PTI Environmental Services, 1991). | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from 15 stations in Rhine Channel, Newport Bay. These stations were distributed throughout the study area. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on May 14, 2002. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP was used. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 308 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 4 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 2 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Toxicity Results: One of 1 sediment sample was significantly toxic to amphipods. None of 1 pore water sample collected exhibited significant effect in Sea Urchin fertilization. None of 1 pore water sample collected exhibited significant effect on Mysid growth. One of 1 sediment-water interface sample was significantly toxic to Sea Urchin fertilization (Bay et al. 2004). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were taken at station NB3. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected in May 2001. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
68358 |
Region 8 |
Rhine Channel |
||
Pollutant: | PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) |
Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Sources: | A Source Unknown |
Expected TMDL Completion Date: | 2019 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | There was no new data considered in the 2014 Listing Cycle, this previously made decision will carryover. The following description applies to an earlier Listing Cycle.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Two of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality objectives and this exceeds the allowable frequency of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current. The decision has not changed. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 309 | ||||
Pollutant: | PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Tissue | ||||
Matrix: | Tissue | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 2 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fish tissue analysis | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Two out of 2 samples exceeded. Filet composite samples of chub mackerel and yellowfin croaker were collected. Chub mackerel were collected in 1997 and yellowfin croaker were collected in 1999. The guideline was exceeded in both samples (TSMP, 2002). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Santa Ana River Basin RWQCB Basin Plan: Toxic substances shall not be discharged at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic resources to levels which are harmful to human health. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | 20 ng/g (OEHHA Screening Value) | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | One station located in the Rhine Channel by the Cannery Restaurant at the upper end of the channel. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected 7/11/97 and 8/10/99. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Environmental Chemistry Quality Assurance and Data Report for the Toxic Substances Monitoring Program, 1996-2000. Department of Fish and Game | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
69877 |
Region 8 |
Rhine Channel |
||
Pollutant: | Toxicity |
Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Sources: | A Source Unknown |
Expected TMDL Completion Date: | 2019 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | No new data were assessed this cycle. The decision has not changed, and is as follows:
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Multiple lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. A sufficient number of the sediment and water samples exhibit toxicity. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Ten of 15 water samples exhibit toxicity, and 19 of 25 sediment samples exhibit toxicity and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current. The decision has not changed. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 306 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 15 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 11 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Eleven of 15 samples exhibited significant toxicity to Amphipods. In fact, one sample from station RC 5 had marginal toxicity and 10 samples collected from RC6 to RC15 had high toxicity (Bay and Greenstein, 2003). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from 15 stations in Rhine Channel, Newport Bay. These stations were distributed throughout the study area. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on May 14, 2002. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP was used. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 307 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 15 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 10 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Ten of 15 samples exhibited significant toxicity effect to sea urchin development test in the sediment-water interface from stations RC2, RC3, RC4, RC7, RC8, RC9, RC11, RC12, RC13, and RC 14. In fact, all samples exhibited high toxicity (BPTCP, 1998). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from stations RC1 - RC15 in Rhine Channel, Newport Bay. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected on May 14, 2002. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP was used. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 313 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | One of 1 site in Rhine Channel exhibited sediment toxicity to amphipods, porewater toxicity to purple urchin larval development, and a transitional benthic community status (Phillips et al. 1998). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Rhine Channel | ||||
Temporal Representation: | 1994-1997. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | BPTCP QAPP. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 314 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 30 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 21 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Eleven of 15 sites had toxicity to amphipods. Ten of 15 samples had sediment-water interface toxicity (Bay and Brown, 2003a). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Rhine Channel. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | 2003. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 308 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 4 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 2 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Toxicity Results: One of 1 sediment sample was significantly toxic to amphipods. None of 1 pore water sample collected exhibited significant effect in Sea Urchin fertilization. None of 1 pore water sample collected exhibited significant effect on Mysid growth. One of 1 sediment-water interface sample was significantly toxic to Sea Urchin fertilization (Bay et al. 2004). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were taken at station NB3. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected in May 2001. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 305 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 6 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 6 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Toxicity Results (Bay and Greenstein, 2003). Two of 2 sediment samples were significantly toxic to amphipods. Two of 2 pore water samples collected exhibited significant effect in Purple Urchin larval development. One of 1 sediment-water interface samples was significantly toxic to Purple Sea Urchin. One of 1 sample exhibited significant toxic effect to Ampelisca. | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Narrative Water Quality Objective: Toxic substances. The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments, biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected from one site in Newport Bay-Rhine Channel. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | One sample was collected in September 1994 and June 1996. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Study was conducted by the California Department of Fish and Game.QA/QC information is contained in the document. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
70738 |
Region 8 |
Rhine Channel |
||
Pollutant: | Zinc |
Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Sources: | A Source Unknown |
Expected TMDL Completion Date: | 2019 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | There was no new data considered in the 2014 Listing Cycle, this previously made decision will carryover. The following description applies to an earlier Listing Cycle.
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Five lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Sediment samples exhibited toxicity and a large number of samples exceeded the water or sediment guidelines. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Three of 24 sediment samples taken exceed the sediment guideline, and 2 of 7 water samples were in exceedance of the CTR guidelines, and 14 of 30 sediment samples exhibited toxicity and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. LOEs 316, 317 and 318 contain data for both dissolved and total metals as well as one pore water sample. The LOEs should be reviewed. It appears that for these grouped LOEs there should be 2 exceedances out of 4 samples. It does not change the listing decision. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current. The decision has not changed. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | LOEs 316, 317 and 318 contain data for both dissolved and total metals as well as one pore water sample. The LOEs should be reviewed. It appears that for these grouped LOEs there should be 2 exceedances out of 4 samples. It does not change the listing decision. |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 315 | ||||
Pollutant: | Zinc | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 20 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 3 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Chemical monitoring of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | One sample taken in May 2001 and one sample taken in November 2001 at station NB3 did not exceed the guideline. One sample taken in March 2002 at station NB3 did not exceed the guideline. One sample taken in September 2000 at station NB3 did not exceed the guideline (Bay et al. 2004).
Three of 20 sediment samples exceeded the objective (Bay and Brown, 2003a). |
||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The sediment quality guideline for marine and estuarine sediments for zinc is 410 ug/g dry weight. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were all taken at station NB3. The 20 samples were collected in the Rhine Channel. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were taken in May and November 2001, March 2002, and September 2000. The 20 samples were collected during 2003. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 319 | ||||
Pollutant: | Zinc | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 15 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 7 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Seven of 15 sediment samples were toxic (<50%) to sea urchins during development, and 7 of 15 sediment samples exhibited less than 50% survival to amphipods. Note that TIEs were not successful in accurately identifying the toxicant(s) (Bay and Brown, 2003a). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Basin Plan Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentrations of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were taken in the Rhine Channel. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were taken during 2003. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 318 | ||||
Pollutant: | Zinc | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 2 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Two out of 2 samples exceeded the CTR (Phillips et al. 1998). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | CTR for zinc in saltwater acute = 81 ug/L. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Rhine Channel. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | |||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | QA Info Missing | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 316 | ||||
Pollutant: | Zinc | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | One total sample taken in March 2002 did not exceed either guideline. One total sample taken in November 2001 did not exceed either guideline (Bay et al. 2004). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The CTR guidelines for zinc in saltwater are acute = 90ppb and chronic 81 ppb. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were taken in March 2002 and November 2001. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were taken at station NB3. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 317 | ||||
Pollutant: | Zinc | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Estuarine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 3 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | One dissolved water sample taken in March 2002 did not exceed either guideline. One dissolved water sample taken in November 2001 did not exceed either guideline. One sediment water interface dissolved sample did not exceed either guideline (Bay et al. 2004). | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The CTR guidelines for zinc in saltwater are acute = 90 ppb and chronic 81 ppb. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Placeholder reference 2006 303(d) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were taken in March 2002 and November 2001. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were taken at station NB3. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | SCCWRP QAPP. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||