Final California 2020 Integrated Report (303(d) List/305(b) Report)

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009.

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QA Info Missing

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	99353	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Copper
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	Marinas and Recreational Boating
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2007
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for removal from the CWA section 303(d) List under section 4.1 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Currently, Newport Bay, upper, is listed for metals. It is not possible in a general listing to determine which specific metal is causing or contributing to a water quality impacts. There is sufficient justification for removing the general listings for metals from the 303(d) list and replace these general listings with the specific metals found to be exceeding. Four lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Seven out of 94 samples exceed the CTR criteria and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy.. Sediment toxicity has been documented, and none of the sediment samples exceeded the sediment quality guideline for copper in this water body. Upper Newport Bay was dredged in 2010. For those areas that were dredged in 2010, a determination of impairment should not be made based on sediment data prior to 2011 since those sediments were removed from the Bay in 2010. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Seven out of 94 water samples exceeded the CTR criteria and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. Sediment toxicity has been documented, but none of the sediment samples exceeded the sediment quality guideline for copper in this water body. Upper Newport Bay was dredged in 2010. For those areas that were dredged in 2010, a determination of impairment should not be made based on sediment data prior to 2011 since those sediments were removed from the Bay in 2010. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. 5.The following information indicates that the water quality standard is not being attained: Data not available for the current listing cycle process were evaluated and are available in the Attachment A to Resolution No. R8-2016-0059. Thirteen out of 27 water samples exceeded the CTR criteria (Coastkeeper 2007) and forty-eight out of 68 water samples exceeded the CTR criteria (Orange County 2009-2011). Two out of two stormwater samples exceeded the CTR criteria (Bay et al. 2004). The total number of exceedances out of the total number of samples (70/191) exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. 6.This process is scientifically defensible and reproducible.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded. There are additional data that are not included in this assessment that show standards are being exceeded. These data should be submitted to CEDEN as soon as possible and prioritized for assessment within the next assessment even if off-cycle for Region 8.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:	5.The following information indicates that the water quality standard is not being attained: Data not available for the current listing cycle process were evaluated and are available in the Attachment A to Resolution No. R8-2016-0059. Thirteen out of 27 water samples exceeded the CTR criteria (Coastkeeper 2007) and forty-eight out of 68 water samples exceeded the CTR criteria (Orange County 2009-2011). Two out of two stormwater samples exceeded the CTR criteria (Bay et al. 2004). The total number of exceedances out of the total number of samples (70/191) exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. 6.This process is scientifically defensible and reproducible.

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99353, Copper	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81821

Pollutant:

Copper

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Five of the 88 samples exceeded the water quality objective for copper.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The concentrations of toxic pollutants in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

The California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations (4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater for copper at 3.1 ug/L.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from within the Upper Newport Bay Ecological Reserve, at four samples stations: Pacific Coast Highway Bridge (UNBCHB), Jamboree Road (UNBJAM), North Star Beach (UNBNSB), and Santa Ana Delhi Channel Mouth (UNBSDC).

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected quarterly starting in Fall of 2006 through June of 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Samples were collected and analyzed in accordance with the signed and certified, Quality Assurance Management Plan for the Orange County Stormwater Program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99353, Copper	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

605

Pollutant:

Copper

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 2 samples exceeded the CTR criteria (USEPA, 2004)

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

From the CTR saltwater chronic criteria is 3.1 ug/L.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at Upper Newport Bay (NB10)

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in November 2001 and March 2002. One sample was collected on each day.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99353, Copper	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

606

Pollutant:

Copper

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Two of four samples taken at different sampling stations exceeded the CTR CCC Criteria (USEPA. 2004).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

CTR Criterion Continuous Concentration for dissolved Copper in saltwater is 3.1 ug/l for the protection of aquatic life.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Four sampling sites located in Upper Newport Bay at North Star Beach and at the mouth of San Diego Creek.

Temporal Representation:

Samples taken between 8/28/01 and 10/29/02.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

USEPA Quality Assurance plan

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99353, Copper	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

604

Pollutant:

Copper

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Sediment

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Chemical monitoring of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 2 samples exceeded the ERM sediment quality guideline. One sample was collected on each day at each location for each metal constituent. Acid volatile results indicate no pore water problem due to copper (Bay and Greenstein, 2003).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The concentration of toxic substance in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

The ERM sediment quality guideline for copper is 270 ug/g (ppm) dry weight (Long et al., 1995).

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected in the Upper Newport Bay (NB10).

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in November 2001 and March 2002.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99353, Copper	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

636

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Toxicity Results: Five of 15 sediment samples were significantly toxic to amphipods. Fifteen of 15 pore water samples collected had significant effect in Purple Urchin larval development. One of 15 sediment water interface samples was significantly toxic to Purple Sea Urchin. Five of 15 sediment water interface samples were significantly toxic to the fertilization test (Phillips et al. 1998).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from 15 sites.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in September 1994, June 1996, and August 1997.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Study was conducted by the California Department of Fish and Game.QA/QC information is contained in the document.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99353, Copper	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

637

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Toxicity Results: Four of 5 sediment samples were significantly toxic to amphipod survival. One of 5 water samples collected had significant effect in Purple Urchin fertilization. None of 2 water samples collected were toxic to Mysid growth. Two of 3 sediment water interface samples were significantly toxic to the Purple Sea Urchin fertilization test (Bay et al., 2004).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009.

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were taken at stations NB1, NB2, NB3, NB4, and NB5.

Temporal Representation:

The samples were taken in May 2001.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCRWP QAPP.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	69700	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Toxicity
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	A Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2027
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for removal from the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 4.1 and 4.6 of the Listing Policy. Under these sections a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Four lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess pollutant. A sufficient number of the sediment and water samples exhibited toxicity. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Thirty-two of 87 samples exhibited sediment toxicity, and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. Twenty-four of 78 samples exhibited water toxicity, and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met. LOEs 636 and 637 need to be reviewed and updated. Porewater exceedances need to be removed from sample count.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:	LOEs 636 and 637 need to be reviewed and updated. Porewater exceedances need to be removed from sample count.

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69700, Toxicity	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

82002

Pollutant:

Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

TOXICITY TESTING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Seventy-eight samples were collected to evaluate water toxicity. Twenty-four of the 78 samples exhibited significant toxicity. The toxicity tests that exhibited significant toxicity included Mysid biomass and survival and Purple Urchin development.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The concentrations of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses. Region 8 Basin Plan.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to West Coast Marine and Estuarine Organisms. EPA/600/R-95-136.

Evaluation Guideline:

Toxicity is defined as a statistically significant effect in the sample exposure compared to the control using EPA-recommended hypothesis testing. The t-test is used to determine if there is a statistically significant decrease in organism response in the sample as compared to the control. Exceedances are counted with the significant effect code SL. SL is defined as the result being significant compared to the negative control based on a statistical test, less than stated the alpha level, AND less than the evaluation threshold.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at stations UNBCHB, UNBJAM, UNBNSB, and UNBSDC Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected from 2006 to 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The data collected under the Quality Assurance Management Plan for The Orange County Stormwater Program. The SWAMP measurement quality objectives were followed for toxicity data. The performance of toxicity bioassays and evaluation of reference toxicants were performed using USEPA and Standard Methods.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69700, Toxicity	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

636

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009.

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from 15 sites.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in September 1994, June 1996, and August 1997.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Study was conducted by the California Department of Fish and Game.QA/QC information is contained in the document.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69700, Toxicity	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

82003

Pollutant:

Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

TOXICITY TESTING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Sixty-two samples were collected to evaluate sediment toxicity. Twenty-two of the 62 samples exhibited significant toxicity. The toxicity tests included survival of Eohaustorius.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The concentrations of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses. Region 8 Basin Plan.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Methods for Assessing the Toxicity of Sediment-associated Contaminants with Estuarine and Marine Amphipods. June 1994. EPA 600/R-94/025

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at station UNBCHB, UNBJAM, UNBNSB, and UNBSDC Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected approximately twice a year from 2006 to 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69700, Toxicity	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

637

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were taken at stations NB1, NB2, NB3, NB4, and NB5.

Temporal Representation:

The samples were taken in May 2001.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCRWP QAPP.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	97817	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Indicator Bacteria
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed with USEPA approved TMDL)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed with USEPA approved TMDL)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	A Source Unknown
TMDL Name:	Newport Bay Watershed Fecal Coliform TMDL
TMDL Project Code:	150
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA:	01/01/2000
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for removal from the CWA section 303(d) List under section 4.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 4.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Seventy One (71) lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Two hundred and Eighty One (281) of 1242 samples exceed the Enterococcus Geomean Objective. One hundred and Twenty Two (122) of 706 samples exceed the Enterococcus Single Sample Objective. One hundred and Nineteen (119) of 1135 samples exceed the Fecal Coliform Geomean Objective. Eighty Five (85) of 706 samples exceed the Fecal Coliform Single Sample Objective. Seventy (70) of 1069 samples exceed the Total Coliform Geomean Objective. Forty (40) of 375 samples exceed the Total Coliform Single Sample Objective. Twenty One (21) of 295 samples exceed the Shellfish Harvesting Total Coliform Objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Two hundred and Eighty One (281) of the 1242 samples exceed the Enterococcus Geomean Objective, 119 of the 1135 samples exceed the Fecal Coliform Geomean Objective, 70 of the 1069 samples exceed the Total Coliform Geomean, and this does not meet the delisting frequency listed in Table 4.2. 4. One hundred and Twenty Two (122) of the 706 samples exceed the Enterococcus Single Sample Objective, 85 of the 706 samples exceed the Fecal Coliform Single Sample Objective, 40 of the 375 samples exceed the Total Coliform Single Sample Objective, and this does not meet the delisting frequency listed in Table 4.2. 5. Twenty One (21) of the 295 samples exceed the Shellfish Total Coliform Objective, and this meets the delisting frequency listed in Table 4.2. 6. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. From the 2010 listing cycle. This pollutant is being considered for listing under section 2.2 of the Listing Policy. Under this section of the Policy, a minimum of one line of evidence is needed to assess listing status. The Newport Bay Watershed Fecal Coliform TMDL was completed in 2000. This water segment-pollutant combination was moved off the section 303(d) list during the 2002 listing cycle. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination in the Water Quality Limited Segments Being Addressed portion of the section 303(d) list. Please note that indicator bacteria was previously called pathogens.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:	From the 2010 listing cycle. This pollutant is being considered for listing under section 2.2 of the Listing Policy. Under this section of the Policy, a minimum of one line of evidence is needed to assess listing status. The Newport Bay Watershed Fecal Coliform TMDL was completed in 2000. This water segment-pollutant combination was moved off the section 303(d) list during the 2002 listing cycle. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination in the Water Quality Limited Segments Being Addressed portion of the section 303(d) list. Please note that indicator bacteria was previously called pathogens.

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81855

Pollutant:

Fecal Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Four of the 23 geomeans exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The standard for fecal coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 200 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at NEWPORT DUNES MIDDLE.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately twice a month from February 2009 to January 2010 and once in August 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the beach watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81854

Pollutant:

Fecal Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Zero of the 8 geomeans exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The standard for fecal coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 400 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at BACK BAY DRAIN PIPE.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately once a month from February 2009 to January 2010 and once in August 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the beach watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81852

Pollutant:

Fecal Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Zero of the 23 geomeans exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The standard for fecal coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 200 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at NORTHSTAR BEACH.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately twice a month from February 2009 to January 2010 and once in August 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the beach watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81843

Pollutant:

Fecal Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Fifteen of the sixteen geometric means exceeded the fecal coliform objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Geomean: The fecal coliform concentration shall not exceed more than 200/100ml. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2006.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected from Upper Newport Bay sites, Pacific Coast Highway Bridge, Jamboree Road, North Star Beach, and Santa Ana Delhi Channel Mouth.

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected from 2006 to 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected and analyzed under the Quality Assurance Management Plan for The Orange County Stormwater Program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81857

Pollutant:

Fecal Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Zero of the 23 geomeans exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The standard for fecal coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 400 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at DE ANZA.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately twice a month from February 2009 to January 2010 and once in August 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the beach watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

95909

Pollutant:

Fecal Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

138

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 138 samples collected, 4 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Fecal Coliform density shall not exceed 200 per 100ml

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The 138 samples were collected at the North Star Beach station located in Lower Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 138 samples were collected between April 2004 and December 2006

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

The data¿s quality is deemed appropriate because it was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board via the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_9222_D.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

This is an empty reference added to the system to allow past cycle LOEs that were previously assigned to the incorrect water body to be moved to their correct water body using an LOE moving tool. The reference itself contains no data and the link will give a 404 error.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

95910

Pollutant:

Fecal Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 38 samples collected, 2 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The 38 samples were collected at the Ski Zone station located in Lower Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 38 samples were collected between April 2004 and December 2006

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

95911

Pollutant:

Fecal Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 79 samples collected, 2 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The 79 samples were collected at the Vaunghns Launch station located in Lower Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 79 samples were collected between April 2004 and December 2006

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

95890

Pollutant:

Fecal Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

149

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 149 samples collected, 24 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Of the 149 samples collected, 24 exceed the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Fecal Coliform <200MPN/100mL

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 149 samples were collected at the Newport Dunes East station located in Lower Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 149 samples were collected weekly between April 2004 and December 2006

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

592

Pollutant:

Pathogens

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Not Recorded

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QA Info Missing

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

8078

Pollutant:

Total Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Shellfish Harvesting

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Shellfish surveys

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 98 samples collected, 41 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the Shellfish Harvesting Standards, at all areas where shellfish may be harvested for human consumption, as determined by the Regional Board, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: The Median Total Coliform density shall not exceed 70 per 100 ml, and not more than 10 percent of the samples shall exceed 230 per 100 ml.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Of the 98 samples collected, 9 exceed the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Median Total Coliform median <70 and no more than 10% of the samples can be >230

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 98 samples were collected at the Newport Boulevard Bridge station located in Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 98 samples were collected in 2004 on the days of April 19, April 26, May 3, May 10, May 24, June 1, June 7, June 21, June 28, July 6, July 14, August 23, August 30, September 7, September 13, November 15, November 22, November 29, December 13, December 20, and December 27; in 2005 on the days of April 18, April 25, May 2, May 9, June 20, June27, July 5, July 11, July 25, August 2, August 15, September 6, September 14, September 19, September 28, October 3, October 11, October 17, October 24, October 31, November 7, November 14, November 21, November 30, December 5, December 12, December 19, and December 27; in 2006 on the days of January 3, January 9, January 17, January 23, January 30, February 6, February 14, February 21, February 27, March 6, March 15, March 20, March 27, April 3, April 11, April 17, April 24, May 1, May 10, May 17, May 24, May 30, June 5, June 12, June 19, June 26, July 5, July 10, July 17, July 24, July 26, July 31, August 7, August 14, August 21, August 28, September 11, September 20, September 25, October 2, October 10, October 16, October 23, October 30, November 20, November 28, December 4, December 11, and December 18

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008
303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_922_B.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

8089

Pollutant:

Total Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Shellfish Harvesting

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Shellfish surveys

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 45 samples collected, 3 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Of the 45 samples collected, 3 exceed the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Median Total Coliform median <70 and no more than 10% of the samples can be >230

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 45 samples were collected at the Ski Zone station located in Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 45 samples were collected in 2004 on the days of April 15, April 19, April 26, May 3, May 10, May 24, June 1, June 7, June 16, June 21, June 28, July 6, July 14, August 23, August 30, September 7, September 13, November 15, November 22, November 29, December 13, December 20, and December 27; in 2005 on the days of September 6, October 3, October 17, November 7, November 14, November 30, December 5, December 12, and December 27; in 2006 on the days of January 3, February 14, February 27, March 15, March 27, April 24, July 31, August 28, September 11, October 10, October 16, October 23, and December 18

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

8084

Pollutant:

Total Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Shellfish Harvesting

Number of Samples:

104

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Shellfish surveys

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 104 samples collected, 6 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Of the 104 samples collected, 6 exceed the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Median Total Coliform median <70 and no more than 10% of the samples can be >230

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 104 samples were collected at the Northstar Beach station located in Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 104 samples were collected in 2004 on the days of April 19, April 26, May 3, May 10, May 24, June 1, June 7, June 16, June 21, June 23, June 28, July 6, July 14, August 23, August 30, September 7, September 13, November 15, November 17, November 22, November 29, December 13, December 20, and December 27; in 2005 on the days of April 18, April 25, May 2, May 9, June 20, June 27, July 5, July 11, July 25, August 2, August 15, September 6, September 14, September 19, September 28, October 3, October 5, October 11, October 17, October 24, October 31, November 7, November 14, November 21, November 30, December 5, December 12, December 19, and December 27; in 2006 on the days of January 3, January 9, January 17, January 19, January 23, January 30, February 6, February 14, February 21, February 27, March 6, March 15, March 20, March 27, April 3, April 11, April 17, April 24, May 1, May 10, May 17, May 24, May 30, June 5, June 12, June 19, June 26, July 5, July 10, July 17, July 24, July 26, July 31, August 7, August 14, August 21, August 28, September 11, September 20, September 25, October 2, October 10, October 16, October 23, October 30, November 20, November 28, December 4, December 6, December 11, December 18, and December 28

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

8093

Pollutant:

Total Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Shellfish Harvesting

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Shellfish surveys

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 45 samples collected, 3 exceed the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Median Total Coliform median <70 and no more than 10% of the samples can be >230

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 45 samples were collected at the Ski Zone station located in Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

Data's quality is deemed appropriate because it was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

8074

Pollutant:

Total Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Shellfish Harvesting

Number of Samples:

101

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Shellfish surveys

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 101 samples collected, 9 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Of the 101 samples collected, 9 exceed the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Median Total Coliform median <70 and no more than 10% of the samples can be >230

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 101 samples were collected at the De Anza station located in Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 101 samples were collected in 2004 on the days of April 19, April 26, May 3, May 10, May 24, June 1, June 7, June 21, June 28, July 6, July 14, August 23, August 30, September 7, September 13, November 15, November 22, November 29, December 13, December 20, and December 27; in 2005 on the days of April 18, April 25, May 2, May 9, June 20, June 27, July 5, July 11, July 25, August 2, August 15, September 6, September 14, September 19, September 28, October 3, October 11, October 17, October 24, October 31, November 7, November 14, November 21, November 30, December 2, December 5, December 7, December 12, December 19, and December 27; in 2006 on the days of January 3, January 9, January 17, January 19, January 23, January 30, February 6, February 14, February 21, February 27, March 6, March 15, March 20, March 27, April 3, April 11, April 17, April 24, May 1, May 10, May 17, May 24, May 30, June 5, June 12, June 19, June 26, July 5, July 10, July 17, July 24, July 26, July 31, August 7, August 14, August 21, August 28, September 11, September 20, September 25, October 2, October 10, October 16, October 23, October 30, November 20, November 28, December 4, December 6, December 11, December 18, and December 28

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81990

Pollutant:

Total Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

229

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed BeachWatch data for Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 18 of 229 samples exceed the criterion for Coliform, Total.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

California Ocean Plan (2009) single sample maximum states that total coliform density shall not exceed 10,000 per 100 mL

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Data for this line of evidence for Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve) was collected at 9 monitoring sites [ NEWPORT DUNES MIDDLE, NEWPORT DUNES WEST, NEWPORT DUNES NORTH, NEWPORT DUNES EAST, BACK BAY DRAIN PIPE, VAUGHS LAUNCH, SKI ZONE, NORTHSTAR BEACH, DE ANZA]

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 2/9/2009-8/30/2010.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the Beach Watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81994

Pollutant:

Total Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

146

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Twenty-two of the 146 samples exceeded the total coliform objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The single sample total coliform concentration shall not exceed more than 10000/100ml. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2006.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected from Upper Newport Bay sites, Pacific Coast Highway Bridge, Jamboree Road, North Star Beach, and Santa Ana Delhi Channel Mouth.

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected from 2006 to 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected and analyzed under the Quality Assurance Management Plan for The Orange County Stormwater Program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

8077

Pollutant:

Total Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

115

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 115 samples collected, 30 exceed the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Total Coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 ml.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The 115 samples were collected at the Newport Boulevard Bridge station located in Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 115 samples were collected between 2004 and 2006

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

8083

Pollutant:

Total Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

128

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 128 samples collected, 5 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Total Coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 ml.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The 128 samples were collected at the Northstar Beach station located in Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 128 samples were collected between 2004 and 2006

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81991

Pollutant:

Total Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Fourteen of the sixteen geometric means exceeded the total coliform objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Geomean: The total coliform concentration shall not exceed more than 1000/100ml. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2006.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected from Upper Newport Bay sites, Pacific Coast Highway Bridge, Jamboree Road, North Star Beach, and Santa Ana Delhi Channel Mouth.

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected from 2006 to 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected and analyzed under the Quality Assurance Management Plan for The Orange County Stormwater Program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81992

Pollutant:

Total Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Zero of the 23 geomeans exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The standard for total coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 1000 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at NEWPORT DUNES WEST.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately twice a month from February 2009 to January 2010 and once in August 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the beach watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81993

Pollutant:

Total Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Zero of the 22 geomeans exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The standard for total coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 1000 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at NORTHSTAR BEACH.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately twice a month from February 2009 to January 2010 and once in August 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the beach watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

8073

Pollutant:

Total Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

134

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 134 samples collected, 5 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Total Coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 ml.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The 134 samples were collected at the De Anza station located in Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 134 samples were collected between 2004 and 2006

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

8087

Pollutant:

Total Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 33 samples collected, 0 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Total Coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 ml.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The 33 samples were collected at the Ski Zone station located in Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 33 samples were collected between 2004 and 2006

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list. The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was MF_APHA_922_B.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

8092

Pollutant:

Total Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 75 samples collected, 0 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Total Coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 ml.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

Spatial Representation:

The 75 samples were collected at the Vaugh's Launch station located in Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 75 samples were collected between 2004 and 2006

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81996

Pollutant:

Total Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Zero of the 22 geomeans exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The standard for total coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 1000 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at NEWPORT DUNES MIDDLE.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately twice a month from February 2009 to January 2010 and once in August 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the beach watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

95900

Pollutant:

Total Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

132

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 132 samples collected, 9 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Total Coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 ml

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Of the 132 samples collected, 9 exceed the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Total Coliform Standard in Ocean Plan and Total Coliform <1000MPN/100mL

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 132 samples were collected at the Newport Dunes West station located in Lower Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 132 samples were collected weekly between April 2004 and December 2006

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

95897

Pollutant:

Total Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

131

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 131 samples collected, 8 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column:Total Coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 ml

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Of the 131 samples collected, 8 exceed the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Total Coliform Standard in Ocean Plan and Total Coliform <1000MPN/100mL

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 131 samples were collected at the Newport Dunes North station located in Lower Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 131 samples were collected weekly between April 2004 and December 2006

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

95894

Pollutant:

Total Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

134

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 134 samples collected, 7 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Total Coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 ml

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Of the 134 samples collected, 7 exceed the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Total Coliform Standard in Ocean Plan and Total Coliform <1000MPN/100mL

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 134 samples were collected at the Newport Dunes Middle station located in Lower Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 134 samples were collected weekly between April 2004 and December 2006

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

82000

Pollutant:

Total Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Zero of the 6 geomeans exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The standard for total coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 1000 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at VAUGHS LAUNCH.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately once a month from February 2009 to January 2010 and once in August 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the beach watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81995

Pollutant:

Total Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Eight of the 8 geomeans exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The standard for total coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 1000 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at BACK BAY DRAIN PIPE.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately once a month from February 2009 to January 2010 and once in August 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the beach watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

95891

Pollutant:

Total Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

139

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 139 samples collected, 14 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometrc mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Total Coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 ml

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Of the 139 samples collected, 14 exceed the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Total Coliform Standard in Ocean Plan and Total Coliform <1000MPN/100mL

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 139 samples were collected at the Newport Dunes East station located in Lower Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 139 samples were collected between April 2004 and December 2006

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81997

Pollutant:

Total Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Zero of the 22 geomeans exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The standard for total coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 1000 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at DE ANZA.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately twice a month from February 2009 to January 2010 and once in August 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the beach watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81998

Pollutant:

Total Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Zero of the 22 geomeans exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The standard for total coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 1000 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at NEWPORT DUNES EAST.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately twice a month from February 2009 to January 2010 and once in August 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the beach watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81999

Pollutant:

Total Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Zero of the 22 geomeans exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The standard for total coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 1000 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at NEWPORT DUNES NORTH.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately twice a month from February 2009 to January 2010 and once in August 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the beach watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

8075

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 98 samples collected, 32 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a single sample maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Enterococcus density shall not exceed 104 per 100 ml

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Of the 98 samples collected, 32 exceeded the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Enterococcus <104MPN/100mL

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 98 samples were collected at the Newport Boulveard Bridge station located in Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

8090

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 69 samples collected, 12 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Of the 69 samples collected, 12 exceeded the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Enterococcus <104MPN/100mL

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 69 samples were collected at the Vaugh's Launch station located in Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 69 samples were collected in 2004 on the days of April 15, April 19, April 26, May 3, May 10, May 24, June 1, June 7, June 16, June 21, June 28, July 6, July 14, August 23, August 30, September 7, September 13, November 15, November 22, November 29, December 13, December 20, and December 27; in 2005 on the days of May 2, June 20, July 5, August 2, August 15, September 6, September 14, September 19, September 28, October 3, October 11, October 17, October 24, October 31, November 7, November 14, November 21, November 30, December 5, December 12, and December 27; in 2006 on the days of January 3, January 9, January 30, February 14, February 27, March 15, March 27, April 11, April 24, May 10, May 24. June 26, July 5, July 10, July 24, July 31, August 7, August 28, September 11, October 10, October 16, October 23, October 30, December 18, and December 28

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81826

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

241

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed BeachWatch data for Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 41 of 241 samples exceed the criterion for Enterococci.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

California Ocean Plan (SWRCB 2009) single sample maximum states that enterococcus density shall not exceed 104 per 100 mL.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 2/9/2009-8/30/2010.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the Beach Watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

8080

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

104

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 104 samples collected, 6 exceeded the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Enterococcus <104MPN/100mL

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 104 samples were collected at the Northstar Beach station located in Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

The data¿s quality is deemed appropriate because it was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

8071

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

101

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 101 samples collected, 8 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Of the 101 samples collected, 8 exceeded the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Enterococcus <104MPN/100mL

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 101 samples were collected at the De Anza station located in Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81837

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

146

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Forty-five of the 146 samples exceeded the enterococcus objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The single sample enterococcus concentration shall not exceed more than 104/100ml. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2006.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected from Upper Newport Bay sites, Pacific Coast Highway Bridge, Jamboree Road, North Star Beach, and Santa Ana Delhi Channel Mouth.

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected from 2006 to 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected and analyzed under the Quality Assurance Management Plan for The Orange County Stormwater Program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

8085

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 45 samples collected, 10 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Of the 45 samples collected, 10 exceeded the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Enterococcus <104MPN/100mL

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 45 samples were collected at the Ski Zone station located in Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

95892

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

145

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 145 samples collected, 26 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Enterococcus density shall not exceed 35 per 100 ml

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Of the 145 samples collected, 26 exceeded the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Enterococcus <35MPN/100mL

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 145 samples were collected at the Newport Dunes Middle station located in Lower Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 145 samples were collected between April 2004 and December 2006

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was EPA_1600. The data¿s quality is deemed appropriate because it was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board via the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81835

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Eight of the 8 geomeans exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The standard for enterococcus states that the density shall not exceed 35 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at BACK BAY DRAIN PIPE.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately once a month from February 2009 to January 2010 and once in August 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the beach watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81829

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Six of the 24 geomeans exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The standard for enterococcus states that the density shall not exceed 35 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at NEWPORT DUNES WEST.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately twice a month from February 2009 to January 2010 and once in August 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the beach watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81828

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Sixteen of the sixteen geometric means exceeded the enterococcus objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Geomena: The enterococcus concentration shall not exceed more than 35/100ml. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2006.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected from Upper Newport Bay sites, Pacific Coast Highway Bridge, Jamboree Road, North Star Beach, and Santa Ana Delhi Channel Mouth.

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected from 2006 to 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected and analyzed under the Quality Assurance Management Plan for The Orange County Stormwater Program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81827

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Five of the 23 geomeans exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The standard for enterococcus states that the density shall not exceed 35 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at NEWPORT DUNES EAST.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately twice a month from February 2009 to January 2010 and once in August 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the beach watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81836

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Six of the 23 geomeans exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The standard for enterococcus states that the density shall not exceed 35 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at NEWPORT DUNES MIDDLE.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately twice a month from February 2009 to January 2010 and once in August 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the beach watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81838

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Four of the 23 geomeans exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The standard for enterococcus states that the density shall not exceed 35 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at DE ANZA.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately twice a month from February 2009 to January 2010 and once in August 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the beach watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81839

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Five of the 23 geomeans exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The standard for enterococcus states that the density shall not exceed 35 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at NEWPORT DUNES NORTH.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately twice a month from February 2009 to January 2010 and once in August 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the beach watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81840

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Five of the 23 geomeans exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The standard for enterococcus states that the density shall not exceed 35 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at NORTHSTAR BEACH.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately twice a month from February 2009 to January 2010 and once in August 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the beach watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81841

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

One of the 6 geomeans exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The standard for enterococcus states that the density shall not exceed 35 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at VAUGHS LAUNCH.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately once a month from February 2009 to January 2010 and once in August 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the beach watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

95895

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

145

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 145 samples collected, 35 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Enterococcus density shall not exceed 35 per 100 ml

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Of the 145 samples collected, 35 exceeded the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Enterococcus <35MPN/100mL

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 102 samples were collected at the Newport Dunes North station located in Lower Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 102 samples were collected between April 2004 and December 2006

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

95898

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

142

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 142 samples collected, 22 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric meanmaximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Enterococcus density shall not exceed 35 per 100 ml

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Of the 142 samples collected, 22 exceeded the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Enterococcus <35MPN/100mL

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 142 samples were collected at the Newport Dunes West station located in Lower Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 142 samples were collected between April 2004 and December 2006

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

95901

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 92 samples taken in Upper Newport Bay, 25 exceeded the geometric mean standard of 35 MPN. The data was obtained from a grant funded by the State Water Resources Control Board for the fecal TMDL in Newport Bay. At each station 3 samples were collected and in the data analyses, each of the 3 samples a geometric mean was calculated. Each of the spatial geometric means were used to calculate temporal geometric means which were used to compare against the standard.

Data Reference:

Enterococcus, Total and E. coli data for Newport Bay and Tributaries

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

EPA's Bacteria Rule for Coastal and Great Lakes Recreation Waters - enterococcus geometric mean 35 MPN

Objective/Criterion Reference:

40 CFR Part 131 Water Quality Standards for Coastal and Great Lakes Recreation Waters; Final Rule [Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 220]

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were taken at 8 locations throughout upper and lower newport bay. At each location three samples were obtained (one in the middle of the location in the bay, the other two at either side of the middle location).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected twice per month beginning with January 2006 through November 2006 and again in February 2007.

Environmental Conditions:

The samples were collected during the wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

The data's quality is deemed appropriate because it originated from a TMDL project with a state approved QAPP.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

95902

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

142

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 142 samples collected, 26 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Enterococcus density shall not exceed 35 per 100 ml

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The 142 samples were collected at the De Anza station located in Lower Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 142 samples were collected weekly between April 2004 and December 2006

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

The EPA Method/Analytical Detection Limit used was EPA_1600.
Data was collected by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency and provided to the Regional Board by the State Water Resources Control Board for the sole purpose of the water quality assessment and update of the 2008 303d list.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

95905

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

143

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 143 samples collected, 15 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The 143 samples were collected at the North Star Beach station located in Lower Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 143 samples were collected weekly between April 2004 and December 2006

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

95906

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 33 samples collected, 6 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The 33 samples were collected at the Ski Zone station located in Lower Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 33 samples were collected weekly between April 2004 and December 2006

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

95907

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 80 samples collected, 39 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The 80 samples were collected at the Vaunghns Launch station located in Lower Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 80 samples were collected weekly between April 2004 and December 2006

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

95889

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

151

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 151 samples collected, 31 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Enterococcus density shall not exceed 35 per 100 ml

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Of the 151samples collected, 31 exceeded the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Enterococcus <104MPN/100mL

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 151 samples were collected at the Newport Dunes East station located in Lower Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 151 samples were collected between April 2004 and December 2006

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

8076

Pollutant:

Fecal Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 98 samples collected, 20 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a single sample maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Fecal Coliform density shall not exceed 400 per 100ml

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Of the 98 samples collected, 20 exceed the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Fecal Coliform <400MPN/100mL

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 98 samples were colleted at the Newport Boulevard Bridge station located in Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

8086

Pollutant:

Fecal Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 45 samples collected, 6 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a single sample maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Fecal Coliform density shall not exceed 400 per 100ml

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Of the 45 samples collected, 6 exceed the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Fecal Coliform <400MPN/100mL

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 45 samples were colleted at the Ski Zone station located in Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

8081

Pollutant:

Fecal Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

104

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 104 samples collected, 5 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a single sample maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Fecal Coliform density shall not exceed 400 per 100ml

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Of the 104 samples collected, 5 exceed the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Fecal Coliform <400MPN/100mL

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 104 samples were colleted at the Northstar Beach station located in Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81853

Pollutant:

Fecal Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

146

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Thirty-eight of the 146 samples exceeded the fecal coliform objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The single sample fecal coliform concentration shall not exceed more than 400/100ml. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2006.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected from Upper Newport Bay sites, Pacific Coast Highway Bridge, Jamboree Road, North Star Beach, and Santa Ana Delhi Channel Mouth.

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected from 2006 to 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected and analyzed under the Quality Assurance Management Plan for The Orange County Stormwater Program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

8091

Pollutant:

Fecal Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 69 samples collected, 5 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a single sample maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Fecal Coliform density shall not exceed 400 per 100ml

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Of the 69 samples collected, 5 exceed the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Fecal Coliform <400MPN/100mL

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 69 samples were colleted at the Vaugh's Launch station located in Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

8072

Pollutant:

Fecal Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

101

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 101 samples collected, 8 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a single sample maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Fecal Coliform density shall not exceed 400 per 100ml

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Of the 101 samples collected, 8 exceed the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Fecal Coliform <400MPN/100mL

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 101 samples were colleted at the De Anza station located in Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81842

Pollutant:

Fecal Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

241

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed BeachWatch data for Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 23 of 241 samples exceed the criterion for Coliform, Fecal.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

California Ocean Plan (SWRCB 2009) single sample maximum states that fecal coliform density shall not exceed 400 per 100ml

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 2/9/2009-8/30/2010.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the Beach Watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81859

Pollutant:

Fecal Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Four of the 24 geomeans exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The standard for fecal coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 200 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at NEWPORT DUNES WEST.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately twice a month from February 2009 to January 2010 and once in August 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the beach watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81860

Pollutant:

Fecal Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Zero of the 6 geomeans exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The standard for fecal coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 200 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at VAUGHS LAUNCH.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately once a month from February 2009 to January 2010 and once in August 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the beach watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

95896

Pollutant:

Fecal Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

142

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 142 samples collected, 23 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Of the 142 samples collected, 23 exceed the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Fecal Coliform <200MPN/100mL

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 142 samples were collected at the Newport Dunes North station located in Lower Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 142 samples were collected weekly between April 2004 and December 2006

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

95899

Pollutant:

Fecal Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

140

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 140 samples collected, 17 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a sin30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Fecal Coliform density shall not exceed 200 per 100ml

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Of the 140 samples collected, 17 exceed the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Fecal Coliform <200MPN/100mL

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 140 samples were collected at the Newport Dunes West station located in Lower Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 140 samples were collected between April 2004 and December 2006

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

95903

Pollutant:

Fecal Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

139

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 139 samples collected, 5 exceed the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

As stated in the California Ocean Plan, under the SWRCB Water-Contact Standards using a 30d geometric mean maximum, within a zone bounded by the shoreline and a distance of 1,000 feet from the shoreline or the 30-foot depth contour, whichever is further from the shoreline, and in areas outside this zone used for water contact sports, as determined by the Regional Board (i.e., waters designated as REC-1), but including all kelp* beds, the following bacterial objectives shall be maintained throughout the water column: Total Coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 ml

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The 139 samples were colleted at the De Anza Street station located in Lower Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 139 samples were collected weekly between April 2004 and December 2006

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81858

Pollutant:

Fecal Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Four of the 23 geomeans exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The standard for fecal coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 200 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at NEWPORT DUNES EAST.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately twice a month from February 2009 to January 2010 and once in August 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the beach watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

95893

Pollutant:

Fecal Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

141

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PATHOGEN MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Of the 141 samples collected, 11 exceeded the standards/guidelines listed above.

Data Reference:

Bacteria data for Orange County beaches downloaded from Orange County Health Care website.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Of the 141 samples collected, 11 exceed the following criteria, or guidelines as stated in the Ocean Plan: Fecal Coliform <200MPN/100mL

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California. California Ocean Plan 2005. Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency

Spatial Representation:

The 141 samples were collected at the Newport Dunes Middle station located in Lower Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

The 141 samples were collected weekly between April 2004 and December 2006

Environmental Conditions:

The data spanned 3 entire years including wet and dry seasons.

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97817, Indicator Bacteria	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81856

Pollutant:

Fecal Coliform

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Four of the 23 geomeans exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The standard for fecal coliform states that the coliform density shall not exceed 200 per 100 mL. Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters 2009.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at NEWPORT DUNES NORTH.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately twice a month from February 2009 to January 2010 and once in August 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected for the beach watch program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	69178	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	2-Methylnaphthalene \| Antimony \| Benzo(a)pyrene \| Chrysene (C1-C4) \| Dieldrin \| Endrin \| PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons) \| Phenanthrene \| Pyrene \| Silver
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	No new data were assessed this cycle. The decision has not changed, and is as follows: These pollutants are being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. Currently, Newport Bay, Upper, is listed for priority organics, pesticides and metals (approximately 120 on the current USEPA priority pollutant list). It is not possible in a general listing to determine which specific pollutant is causing or contributing to a water quality impacts. There is sufficient justification for removing the general listings for organics, pesticides, and metals from the 303(d) list and replace these general listings with the specific pollutants found to be exceeding. Eleven lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess each pollutant. None of the evaluated pollutants exceeded pollutant specific sediment quality guidelines. Although sediment toxicity has been documented in this water body, it cannot be associated with any of these pollutants. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification in favor of placing these specific priority pollutants on the section 303(d) list. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of 9 lines of evidence exceeded sediment quality guidelines for these pollutants. Therefore, a link between the sediment toxicity in this waterbody and these pollutants cannot be made. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current cycle. The decision has not changed.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69178, Multiple Pollutants	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

627

Pollutant:

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Sediment

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Chemical monitoring of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of 2 samples exceeded the ERM or PEL-SQG. (Bay and Greenstein, 2003).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The concentration of toxic substance in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

The ERM sediment quality guideline antimony is 25 ug/g (ppm) dry weight (Long et al., 1995); the PEL sediment quality guidelines for silver is 1.77 ug/g (ppm) dry weight (MacDonald et. al., 1996); the PEL sediment quality guidelines for 2-methylnapthalene is 201.3ng/g (ppm) dry weight (MacDonald et. al., 1996); the PEL sediment quality guidelines for phenanthrene is 543.5ug/g (ppm) dry weight (MacDonald et. al., 1996);the PEL sediment quality guidelines for chrysene is 846 ng/g (ppm) dry weight (MacDonald et. al., 1996);the PEL sediment quality guidelines for pyrene is 397 ng/g (ppm) dry weight (MacDonald et. al., 1996); the PEL sediment quality guidelines for Benzo[a]pyrene is 763.2 ug/kg (ppm) dry weight (Fairey et.al. 2001). The sediment quality guidelines for dieldrin is 8 mg/kg (Long et. al., 1995); the sediment quality guidelines for endrin is 0.76 (OC) ug/kg (ppb) dry weight. (USEPA, 1993).

Guideline Reference:

Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009.

Spatial Representation:

Sample were collected in the Upper Bay at site NB10.

Temporal Representation:

One sample each was collected in November 2001 and March 2002.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	99004	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Arsenic
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 3.1, 3.5 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 and 3.5 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with sediment toxicity to justify adding that pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List. Currently, Newport Bay, upper, is listed for metals. It is not possible, in a general listing, to determine which specific metal could be causing or contributing to a water quality impacts. There is sufficient justification for removing the general listings for metals from the 303(d) list and replace these general listings with the specific metals when found to be exceeding. Six lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. One of the one samples exceed the OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal of 0.0052 ppm in shellfish tissue. None of the 26 samples exceed the USEPA screening value of 1.2 mg/kg for the protection of human health. Sediment and water samples did not exceed the applicable sediment and CTR water column guidelines and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Although sediment toxicity has been documented in this water body, it cannot be associated with this pollutant. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category because data that show exceedances were not submitted for this integrated report cycle and are not included in this analysis. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. One of the one samples exceeded the OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal of 0.0052 ppm in shellfish tissue. None of the 26 samples exceeded the USEPA screening value of 1.2 mg/kg for the protection of human health. Sediment and water samples did not exceed the applicable sediment and CTR water column guidelines and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Although sediment toxicity has been documented in this water body, it cannot be associated with this pollutant. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. 5. The following information indicates that the water quality standard is not being attained: Data not available for the current listing cycle process were evaluated and are available in the Attachment A to Resolution No. R8-2016-0059. Data were assessed using a human health guideline in Arsenic of 0.026 ug/g and showed that 7/7 filets, 1/1 filet +2/2 mussels exceeded this guideline. These data exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 6.This process is scientifically defensible and reproducible.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because data that were assessed show that applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. There are additional data that are not included in this assessment that show standards are being exceeded. These data should be submitted to CEDEN as soon as possible and prioritized for assessment within the next assessment even if off-cycle for Region 8.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:	5. The following information indicates that the water quality standard is not being attained: Data not available for the current listing cycle process were evaluated and are available in the Attachment A to Resolution No. R8-2016-0059. Data were assessed using a human health guideline in Arsenic of 0.026 ug/g and showed that 7/7 filets, 1/1 filet +2/2 mussels exceeded this guideline. These data exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 6.This process is scientifically defensible and reproducible.

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99004, Arsenic	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81815

Pollutant:

Arsenic

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 88 samples exceeded the water quality objective for arsenic.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The concentrations of toxic pollutants in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

The California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations (4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater for Arsenic at 36 ug/L.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected quarterly starting in Fall of 2006 through June of 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Samples were collected and analyzed in accordance with the signed and certified, Quality Assurance Management Plan for the Orange County Stormwater Program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99004, Arsenic	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81943

Pollutant:

Arsenic

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Shellfish

Beneficial Use:

Shellfish Harvesting

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Shellfish surveys

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

The one sample did exceed the guideline. Data were reported on a dry
weight basis and were converted to a wet weight basis by multiplying the
dry-weight concentration by a factor of 1 minus the percentage of
moisture content expressed as a decimal. Ten percent of the total arsenic
result was used to estimate of the amount of inorganic arsenic in the
sample; this number was screened against the guideline.

Data Reference:

State Mussel Watch Program Data 1977-2000; Winter 2007-Winter 2009. State Water Resources Control Board

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

Evaluation Guideline:

The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for arsenic in shellfish tissue is 0.0052 ppm. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 21 g/day for a 30 year exposure over a 70-year lifetime. This constituent is a carcinogen therefore the risk level is set to one in a million. (Brodberg, R.K., and G.A. Pollock, 1999; Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008; OEHHA, 2004)

Guideline Reference:

Prevalence of Selected Target Chemical Contaminants in Sport Fish From Two California Lakes: Public health designed screening study. Sacramento, CA: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment

Guideline Reference:

Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene

Guideline Reference:

Air Toxics Hotspots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines. Part ll Technical Support Document for Describing Available Cancer Potency Values.

Spatial Representation:

Samples are collected by hand from three sub-locations for each site. The composite sample was collected from site NHPB.

Temporal Representation:

Representative samples of locally abundant species were collected during the winter on 1/19/2008

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99004, Arsenic	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

596

Pollutant:

Arsenic

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Not Recorded

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fish tissue analysis

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of 3 samples exceeded the USEPA screening value. (TSMP, 2000).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Toxic Substances shall not be discharged at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic resources to levels harmful to humans (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

The USEPA screening value of 1.2 ppm wet weight for inorganic arsenic is considered the most reliable risk-based screening value when compared with inorganic arsenic or as a percentage of total arsenic when inorganic arsenic data is not available. To be conservative and consistent with other agencies, USEPA finds acceptable to assume that inorganic arsenic comprises 10 percent of total arsenic for finfish and 60 percent of total arsenic in shellfish tissue.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected in the Outer Newport Bay, Upper.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected between November 2000 and January 2001.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99004, Arsenic	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

622

Pollutant:

Arsenic

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Sediment

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Chemical monitoring of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of 2 samples exceeded the ERM-SQG. (Bay and Greenstein, 2003).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The concentration of toxic substance in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

The ERM- sediment quality guideline for arsenic is 70 ug/g (ppm) dry weight (Long et al., 1995)

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected in the upper Newport Bay at site NB10.

Temporal Representation:

One sample was collected in each sampling event ( November 2001 and March 2002).

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99004, Arsenic	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

636

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from 15 sites.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in September 1994, June 1996, and August 1997.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Study was conducted by the California Department of Fish and Game.QA/QC information is contained in the document.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99004, Arsenic	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

637

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were taken at stations NB1, NB2, NB3, NB4, and NB5.

Temporal Representation:

The samples were taken in May 2001.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCRWP QAPP.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99004, Arsenic	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

623

Pollutant:

Arsenic

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of 3 samples exceeded the CTR criteria. (Bay and Greenstein, 2003).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The CRT saltwater chronic criteria for arsenic is 36 ug/L (ppb) (USEPA, 2000).

The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected in the Upper Newport Bay at sites NB10. Two samples were water column measurements and one was a surface water interface sample.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in November 2001 and March 2002. One water column sample was collected from each date and the surface water interface sample was collected in November 2001.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99004, Arsenic	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

595

Pollutant:

Arsenic

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Not Recorded

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fish tissue analysis

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of 23 the samples taken exceeded the inorganic arsenic 10% calculated portion of the total arsenic concentration in tissue. (TSMP, 2000).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Toxic Substances shall not be discharged at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic resources to levels harmful to humans (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

There is not an applicable tissue screening value available for total arsenic in tissue. Analytical measurements reported as total arsenic do not provide a viable means of assessing arsenic in tissue for the protection of human health. The screening value of 1.2 ppm wet weight for inorganic arsenic is considered the most reliable risk-based screening value when compared with inorganic arsenic or as a percentage of total arsenic when inorganic arsenic data is not available. To be conservative and consistent with other agencies, USEPA finds acceptable to assume that inorganic arsenic comprises 10 percent of total arsenic for finfish and 60 percent of total arsenic in shellfish tissue.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at the Upper Newport Bay in the outer upper and inner upper bay.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in November 2000-January 2001, June-July 2001, and March-April & August-September 2002.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.The report shows evidence of lab QC such as spikes and replicates.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	69057	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Cadmium
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.1, 3.5 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 and 3.5 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with sediment toxicity to justify adding that pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List. Currently, Newport Bay, Upper, is listed for metals. It is not possible, in a general listing, to determine which specific metal is causing or contributing to a water quality impacts. There is sufficient justification for removing the general listings for metals from the 303(d) list and replace these general listings with the specific metals when found to be exceeding. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The tissue, water column, and sediment data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The tissue, water column, and sediment data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of 9 tissue samples taken exceed the cadmium 3 ppm wet weight OEHHA screening value (OEHHA, 1999), none of 91 water column samples exceeded the cadmium CTR saltwater chronic criteria, and none of two samples exceeded the PEL sediment quality guideline. These samples do not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. There is sediment toxicity but it does not appear to be associated with this pollutant. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69057, Cadmium	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

636

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from 15 sites.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in September 1994, June 1996, and August 1997.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Study was conducted by the California Department of Fish and Game.QA/QC information is contained in the document.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69057, Cadmium	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

637

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were taken at stations NB1, NB2, NB3, NB4, and NB5.

Temporal Representation:

The samples were taken in May 2001.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCRWP QAPP.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69057, Cadmium	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

620

Pollutant:

Cadmium

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Sediment

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Chemical monitoring of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of 2 samples exceeded the PEL sediment quality guideline (Bay and Greenstein, 2003).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

The PEL sediment quality guideline for cadmium is 4.21ppm (MacDonald et al., 1996).

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at the Upper Newport Bay at NPDES monitoring station NB10.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in November 2001 and March 2002.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69057, Cadmium	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

598

Pollutant:

Cadmium

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fish tissue analysis

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of 8 samples exceeded the OEHHA screening value. A total of 4 samples were collected in the outer upper and 4 in the inner upper (TSMP, 2000).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Toxic Substances shall not be discharged at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic resources to levels harmful to humans (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

The OEHHA screening value for cadmium (fish consumption) is 3 ppm (OEHHA, 1999).

Guideline Reference:

State Mussel Watch Program Data 1977-2000; Winter 2007-Winter 2009. State Water Resources Control Board

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected in the outer and inner Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in March-April & August-September 2002.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.The report shows evidence of lab QC such as spikes and replicates.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69057, Cadmium	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81816

Pollutant:

Cadmium

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Shellfish

Beneficial Use:

Shellfish Harvesting

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Shellfish surveys

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

The sample did not exceed the guideline. Data were reported on a dry weight basis and were converted to a wet weight basis by multiplying the dry-weight concentration by a factor of 1 minus the percentage of moisture content expressed as a decimal.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

Evaluation Guideline:

The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for cadmium in shellfish tissue is 3.3 ppm. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 21 g/day. (Brodberg, R.K., and G.A. Pollock, 1999; Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008; USEPA, 2000)

Guideline Reference:

Prevalence of Selected Target Chemical Contaminants in Sport Fish From Two California Lakes: Public health designed screening study. Sacramento, CA: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment

Guideline Reference:

Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene

Guideline Reference:

Guidance for Assessing Chemical Contaminant Data for Use In Fish Advisories Volume 1: Fish Sampling and Analysis

Spatial Representation:

Samples are collected by hand from three sub-locations for each site. The composite sample was collected from site NHPB.

Temporal Representation:

Representative samples of locally abundant species were collected during the winter on 1/19/2008

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69057, Cadmium	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81817

Pollutant:

Cadmium

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 88 samples exceeded the water quality objective for cadmium.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The concentrations of toxic pollutants in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

The California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations (4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater for cadmium at 9.3 ug/L.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected quarterly starting in Fall of 2006 through June of 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Samples were collected and analyzed in accordance with the signed and certified, Quality Assurance Management Plan for the Orange County Stormwater Program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69057, Cadmium	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

619

Pollutant:

Cadmium

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of 3 samples were in exceedance of the CTR criteria. (Bay and Greenstein, 2003).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The CTR for dissolved cadmium, the saltwater (chronic) standard is 9.3 ppb (USEPA, 2000).

The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at the Upper Newport Bay at NB 10.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in November 2001 and March 2002. One water column sample was taken on each sampling event (November 2001 and March 2002) and one surface water interface sample was collected in November 2001.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	99295	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Chromium
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	No new data were assessed this cycle. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category because data that show exceedances were not submitted for this integrated report cycle and are not included in this analysis. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. The following information indicates that the water quality standard is not being attained: Data not available for the current listing cycle process were evaluated and are available in the Attachment A to Resolution No. R8-2016-0059. Data were assessed using a human health guideline in Chromium of 1.0 ug/g and showed that 7/7 filets exceeded this guideline. Data were also assessed using a wildlife guideline in chromium of 2.5 ug/g that showed 26/31 fish exceeded this guideline. These data exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. This process is scientifically defensible and reproducible. The decision has not changed, and is as follows: This pollutant is being considered for listing under sections 2.1 and 3.5 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.5 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Currently, Newport Bay, upper, is listed for metals. It is not possible, in a general listing, to determine which specific metal could be causing or contributing to a water quality impacts. There is sufficient justification for removing the general listings for metals from the 303(d) list and replace these general listings with the specific metals when found to be exceeding. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. A tissue screening value is not available that complies with the requirements of section 6.1.3 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 3. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current cycle. The decision has not changed. There are additional data that are not included in this assessment that show standards are being exceeded. These data should be submitted to CEDEN as soon as possible and prioritized for assessment within the next assessment even if off-cycle for Region 8.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99295, Chromium	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

614

Pollutant:

Chromium (total)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fish tissue analysis

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Eight samples were collected. (TSMP, 2000).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Toxic Substances shall not be discharged at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic resources to levels harmful to humans (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

There is no applicable guideline available to assess total chromium in tissue.

Guideline Reference:

Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009.

Spatial Representation:

Four samples were collected from the outer upper bay and 4 from the inner upper bay.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collect in March - April and August - September 2002.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP was used.QA/QC samples were collected.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	98898	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Diazinon
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. The Newport Bay Watershed Diazinon/Chlorpyrifos TMDL was approved by RWQCB on April 4, 2003 and subsequently approved by USEPA on February 13, 2004. This TMDL was developed to address a general pesticides listing. The general pesticides decision was renamed to chlorpyrifos. Both this decision and the chlorpyrifos decision addressed the Newport Bay Watershed Diazinon/Chlorpyrifos TMDL which addressed the general pesticides listing. Samples indicate that beneficial uses are no longer impaired due to diazinon and chlorpyrifos. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 91 samples exceed the criteria continuous concentration in saltwater. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of the 91 samples exceed the criteria continuous concentration in saltwater and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 98898, Diazinon	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81822

Pollutant:

Diazinon

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of 91 samples exceed the Criteria Continuous Concentration for diazinon of 820 ng/L.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Marine communities, including vertebrate, invertebrate, and plant species, shall not be degraded.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

Evaluation Guideline:

The Criteria Continuous Concentration for diazinon in saltwater is 820 ng/L.

Guideline Reference:

Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Diazinon

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at sites: UNBCHB, UNBJAM, UNBNSB and UNBSDC.

Temporal Representation:

amples were collected 2006 to 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data were submitted with the County of Orange Stormwater Program Quality Assurance Management Plan (QAMP) dated January 2010. However, data were collected prior to the development of this QAMP, therefore the quality of these data are unknown.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 98898, Diazinon	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

591

Pollutant:

Pesticides

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Not Recorded

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

State Mussel Watch Program Data 1977-2000; Winter 2007-Winter 2009. State Water Resources Control Board

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QA Info Missing

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	72744	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Dieldrin
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.1, 3,5 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under sections 3.1 and 3.5 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with sediment toxicity to justify adding that pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List. Currently, Newport Bay is listed for pesticides. It is not possible, in a general listing, to determine which specific pollutant is causing or contributing to a water quality impacts. There is sufficient justification for removing the general listings for pesticides from the 303(d) list and replace these general listings with the specific pollutants when found to be exceeding. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The sediment guidelines and tissue screening values used complies, with the requirements of section 6.1.3 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 3. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 4. Zero of the 1 sample exceeded the modified OEHHA fish contaminant goal in shellfish tissue. None of the 2 samples exceeded the dry weight ERM sediment quality guideline, and none of 23 samples exceeded the wet weight OEHHA screening value. These do not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Although sediment toxicity has been documented in this water body, it cannot be associated with this pollutant. 5. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 72744, Dieldrin	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81823

Pollutant:

Dieldrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Shellfish

Beneficial Use:

Shellfish Harvesting

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Shellfish surveys

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Toxic substances shall not be discharged at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic resources to level which are harmful to human health. The concentrations of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Prevalence of Selected Target Chemical Contaminants in Sport Fish From Two California Lakes: Public health designed screening study. Sacramento, CA: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment

Evaluation Guideline:

The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for dieldrin in shellfish tissue is 0.49 ppb. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 21 g/day for a 30 year exposure over a 70-year lifetime. This constituent is a carcinogen therefore the risk level is set to one in a million. (Brodberg, R.K., and G.A. Pollock, 1999; Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008)

Guideline Reference:

Guideline Reference:

Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene

Spatial Representation:

Samples are collected by hand from three sub-locations for each site. The composite sample was collected from site NHPB.

Temporal Representation:

Representative samples of locally abundant species were collected during the winter on 1/19/2008

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 72744, Dieldrin	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

618

Pollutant:

Dieldrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Not Specified

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fish tissue analysis

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 23 samples exceeded the OEHHA screening value. All samples were non detects. Out of the 23 samples, 19 were collected in the outer Upper Bay and 4 in the inner Upper Bay. (Bay and Greenstein, 2003).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Toxic Substances shall not be discharged at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic resources to levels harmful to humans (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

The OEHHA screening value for dieldrin is 2.0 ug/kg (ppb) wet weight tissue (OEHHA, 1999).

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected in the Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected November 2001 and March 2002.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used. QA/QC information is included in the document.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 72744, Dieldrin	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

617

Pollutant:

Dieldrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Sediment

Matrix:

Not Specified

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Chemical monitoring of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 2 samples exceeded the ERM-SQG guideline. (Bay and Greenstein, 2003).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The concentration of toxic substance in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

The ERM sediment quality guideline for dieldrin is 8 ug/g (ppm) dry weight (Long et al., 1995)

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at NPDES stations in the Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in November 2001 and March 2002.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 72744, Dieldrin	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

637

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were taken at stations NB1, NB2, NB3, NB4, and NB5.

Temporal Representation:

The samples were taken in May 2001.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCRWP QAPP.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 72744, Dieldrin	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

636

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

State Mussel Watch Program Data 1977-2000; Winter 2007-Winter 2009. State Water Resources Control Board

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from 15 sites.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in September 1994, June 1996, and August 1997.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Study was conducted by the California Department of Fish and Game.QA/QC information is contained in the document.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	99495	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Endosulfan
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 3.1 and 3.5 of the Listing Policy. Under sections 3.1 and 3.5 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 1 sample exceed the modified OEHHA fish contaminant goal in shellfish tissue. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 1 sample exceeds the modified OEHHA fish contaminant goal in shellfish tissue and and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99495, Endosulfan	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81824

Pollutant:

Endosulfan

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Shellfish

Beneficial Use:

Shellfish Harvesting

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Shellfish surveys

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

Evaluation Guideline:

The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for endosulfan (l and ll) in shellfish tissue is 20,000 ppb. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 21 g/day. (Brodberg, R.K., and G.A. Pollock, 1999; Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008; USEPA, 2000)

Guideline Reference:

Prevalence of Selected Target Chemical Contaminants in Sport Fish From Two California Lakes: Public health designed screening study. Sacramento, CA: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment

Guideline Reference:

Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene

Guideline Reference:

Guidance for Assessing Chemical Contaminant Data for Use In Fish Advisories Volume 1: Fish Sampling and Analysis

Spatial Representation:

Samples are collected by hand from three sub-locations for each site. The composite sample was collected from site NHPB.

Temporal Representation:

Representative samples of locally abundant species were collected during the winter on 1/19/2008

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	99553	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Endrin
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 3.1 and 3.5 of the Listing Policy. Under sections 3.1 and 3.5 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 1 sample exceeds the modified OEHHA fish contaminant goal in shellfish. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 1 sample exceeds the modified OEHHA fish contaminant goal in shellfish and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99553, Endrin	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81825

Pollutant:

Endrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Shellfish

Beneficial Use:

Shellfish Harvesting

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Shellfish surveys

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

State Mussel Watch Program Data 1977-2000; Winter 2007-Winter 2009. State Water Resources Control Board

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

Evaluation Guideline:

The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for endrin in shellfish tissue is 1,000 ppb. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 21 g/day. (Brodberg, R.K., and G.A. Pollock, 1999; Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008; USEPA, 2000)

Guideline Reference:

Prevalence of Selected Target Chemical Contaminants in Sport Fish From Two California Lakes: Public health designed screening study. Sacramento, CA: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment

Guideline Reference:

Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene

Guideline Reference:

Guidance for Assessing Chemical Contaminant Data for Use In Fish Advisories Volume 1: Fish Sampling and Analysis

Spatial Representation:

Samples are collected by hand from three sub-locations for each site. The composite sample was collected from site NHPB.

Temporal Representation:

Representative samples of locally abundant species were collected during the winter on 1/19/2008

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	99554	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Heptachlor epoxide
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 3.1 and 3.5 of the Listing Policy. Under sections 3.1 and 3.5 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 1 sample exceeds the OEHHA screening level in shellfish tissue. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of the 1 sample exceeds the OEHHA screening level in shellfish tissue and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99554, Heptachlor epoxide	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81974

Pollutant:

Heptachlor epoxide

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Shellfish

Beneficial Use:

Shellfish Harvesting

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Shellfish surveys

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

The sample did not exceed the screening criteria. Data were reported on a dry weight basis and were converted to a wet weight basis by multiplying the dry-weight concentration by a factor of 1 minus the percentage of moisture content expressed as a decimal.

Data Reference:

State Mussel Watch Program Data 1977-2000; Winter 2007-Winter 2009. State Water Resources Control Board

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

Evaluation Guideline:

The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for heptachlor epoxide in shellfish tissue is 1.4 ppb. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 21 g/day for a 30 year exposure over a 70-year lifetime. This constituent is a carcinogen therefore the risk level is set to one in a million. (Brodberg, R.K., and G.A. Pollock, 1999; Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008; OEHHA, 1999)

Guideline Reference:

Prevalence of Selected Target Chemical Contaminants in Sport Fish From Two California Lakes: Public health designed screening study. Sacramento, CA: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment

Guideline Reference:

Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene

Guideline Reference:

Public Health Goal for Heptachlor and Heptachlor Epoxide in Drinking Water

Spatial Representation:

Samples are collected by hand from three sub-locations for each site. The composite sample was collected from site NHPB.

Temporal Representation:

Representative samples of locally abundant species were collected during the winter on 1/19/2008

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	99555	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Hexachlorobenzene/ HCB
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 3.1 and 3.5 of the Listing Policy. Under sections 3.1 and 3.5 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 1 sample exceed OEHHA's screening level guideline in shellfish tissue. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of the 1 sample exceed OEHHA's screening level guideline in shellfish tissue and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99555, Hexachlorobenzene/ HCB	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81975

Pollutant:

Hexachlorobenzene/ HCB

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Shellfish

Beneficial Use:

Shellfish Harvesting

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Shellfish surveys

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

State Mussel Watch Program Data 1977-2000; Winter 2007-Winter 2009. State Water Resources Control Board

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Prevalence of Selected Target Chemical Contaminants in Sport Fish From Two California Lakes: Public health designed screening study. Sacramento, CA: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment

Evaluation Guideline:

The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for hexachlorobenzene in shellfish tissue is 4.3 ppb. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 21 g/day for a 30 year exposure over a 70-year lifetime. This constituent is a carcinogen therefore the risk level is set to one in a million. (Brodberg, R.K., and G.A. Pollock, 1999; Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008; OEHHA, 2005)

Guideline Reference:

Guideline Reference:

Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene

Guideline Reference:

Air Toxics Hotspots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines. Part ll Technical Support Document for Describing Available Cancer Potency Values.

Spatial Representation:

Samples are collected by hand from three sub-locations for each site. The composite sample was collected from site NHPB.

Temporal Representation:

Representative samples of locally abundant species were collected during the winter on 1/19/2008

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	69459	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Lead
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with sediment toxicity to justify adding that pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List. Three lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 91 water samples exceed the CTR and none of the 6 sediment samples exceed the PEL guideline for this pollutant. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. Currently, Newport Bay, upper, is listed for metals. It is not possible, in a general listing, to determine which specific metal could be causing or contributing to a water quality impacts. There is sufficient justification for removing the general listings for metals from the 303(d) list and replace these general listings with the specific metals when found to be exceeding. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 91 water samples exceeded the CTR and none of the 6 sediment samples exceeded the PEL for this pollutant. Although sediment toxicity has been documented in this water body, it cannot be associated with this pollutant. This does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69459, Lead	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

636

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from 15 sites.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in September 1994, June 1996, and August 1997.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Study was conducted by the California Department of Fish and Game.QA/QC information is contained in the document.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69459, Lead	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

626

Pollutant:

Lead

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Sediment

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Chemical monitoring of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 6 samples exceeded the sediment criteria for lead. (Bay and Greenstein, 2003).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

112.18 ug/g (dw) [PEL for Marine and Estuarine Sediments].

Guideline Reference:

Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009.

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from Upper Bay at sites NB10, NB10-B, and NB10-C

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in November of 2001, and March of 2002.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69459, Lead	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81976

Pollutant:

Lead

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 88 samples exceeded the water quality objective for lead.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The concentrations of toxic pollutants in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

The California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations (4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater for lead at 8.1 ug/L.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected quarterly starting in Fall of 2006 through June of 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Samples were collected and analyzed in accordance with the signed and certified, Quality Assurance Management Plan for the Orange County Stormwater Program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69459, Lead	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

625

Pollutant:

Lead

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 3 samples exceeded the CTR criteria. (Bay and Greenstein, 2003).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The concentration of toxic substance in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

The CTR for saltwater (chronic) for lead is 8.1 ug/L (ppb) (USEPA, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at the Upper Newport Bay at NB 10.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in November 2001 and March 2002. One water column sample was taken on each sampling event (November 2001 and March 2002 and one surface water interface sample was collected in November 2001.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69459, Lead	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

637

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

State Mussel Watch Program Data 1977-2000; Winter 2007-Winter 2009. State Water Resources Control Board

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were taken at stations NB1, NB2, NB3, NB4, and NB5.

Temporal Representation:

The samples were taken in May 2001.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCRWP QAPP.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	99556	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH)
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 3.1 and 3.5 of the Listing Policy. Under sections 3.1 and 3.5 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 1 sample exceed OEHHA's screening level guideline in shellfish tissue. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of the 1 sample exceed OEHHA's screening level guideline in shellfish tissue and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99556, Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH)	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81977

Pollutant:

Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Shellfish

Beneficial Use:

Shellfish Harvesting

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Shellfish surveys

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Prevalence of Selected Target Chemical Contaminants in Sport Fish From Two California Lakes: Public health designed screening study. Sacramento, CA: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment

Evaluation Guideline:

The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for lindane in shellfish tissue is 7.1 ppb. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 21 g/day for a 30 year exposure over a 70-year lifetime. This constituent is a carcinogen therefore the risk level is set to one in a million. (Brodberg, R.K., and G.A. Pollock, 1999; Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008; OEHHA, 2005)

Guideline Reference:

Guideline Reference:

Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene

Guideline Reference:

Air Toxics Hotspots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines. Part ll Technical Support Document for Describing Available Cancer Potency Values.

Spatial Representation:

Samples are collected by hand from three sub-locations for each site. The composite sample was collected from site NHPB.

Temporal Representation:

Representative samples of locally abundant species were collected during the winter on 1/19/2008

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	99493	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Mercury
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.1, 3.5 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under sections 3.1 and 3.5 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with sediment toxicity to justify adding that pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List. Five lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Three of the 46 water samples exceed the saltwater CTR; none of 2 sediment samples exceed the dry weight PEL sediment quality guideline, none of the 23 tissue samples exceed the wet weight OEHHA screening value and none of the 1 shellfish sample exceeds the USEPA 304(a) recommended water quality criterion for shellfish tissue. There is sediment toxicity but it does not appear to be associated with this pollutant. Currently, Newport Bay is listed for metals. It is not possible, in a general listing, to determine which specific pollutant is causing or contributing to a water quality impacts. There is sufficient justification for removing the general listings for metals from the 303(d) list and replace these general listings with the specific pollutants when found to be exceeding. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Three of the 46 water samples exceeded the saltwater CTR; none of 2 sediment samples exceeded the dry weight PEL sediment quality guideline,none of the 23 tissue samples exceeded the wet weight OEHHA screening value, and none of the 1 shellfish sample exceeds the USEPA 304(a) recommended water quality criterion for shellfish tissue. There is sediment toxicity but the toxicity does not appear to be associated with this pollutant. This does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99493, Mercury	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81980

Pollutant:

Mercury

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Three of the 44 samples exceeded the water quality objective for mercury. The dissolved mercury result for sample UNBCHB collected on 9/18/2008 was not detected at 2 ug/L (elevated reporting level) and the total mercury result was 13 ug/L. This sample was included as an exceedance of the water quality objective rather than not including it in the assessment because the total mercury result was so high.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The concentrations of toxic pollutants in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

National Recommended Water Quality Criteria Continuous Concentrations (4-day average concentrations) for saltwater aquatic organisms exposure to elemental mercury is 0.94 ug/L.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected quarterly starting in Fall of 2006 through June of 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Samples were collected and analyzed in accordance with the signed and certified, Quality Assurance Management Plan for the Orange County Stormwater Program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99493, Mercury	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

589

Pollutant:

Mercury

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Sediment

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Chemical monitoring of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 2 samples exceeded the PEL-SQG. (Bay and Greenstein, 2003).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The concentration of toxic substance in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

The PEL-SQG for mercury is 2.1 ug/g (ppm) dry weight (MacDonald et al., 1996).

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected in the Upper Newport Bay site NB10.

Temporal Representation:

One sample was at each sampling event in November 2001 and in March 2002.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99493, Mercury	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

624

Pollutant:

Mercury

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fish tissue analysis

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 23 samples exceeded the OEHHA screening value. (TSMP, 2000).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Toxic Substances shall not be discharged at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic resources to levels harmful to humans (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

The OEHHA screening value for mercury is 0.3 mg/kg (ppm) wet weight (OEHHA, 1999)

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected in the Upper Newport Bay; 19 in the outer bay and 4 in the inner bay.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in November 2000-January 2001, June-July 2001. and April-March and August-September 2002.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99493, Mercury	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

590

Pollutant:

Mercury

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 2 samples for dissolved mercury were in exceedance. (Bay and Greenstein, 2003).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative objective: Toxic substance shall not be discharged at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic resources to which are harmful to human health. The concentrations of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

0.051 ug/L (CTR for Organisms Only).

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected in the Upper Newport Bay at site NB10.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in November 2001 and March 2002. One water column sample was collected on each sampling event.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99493, Mercury	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

637

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were taken at stations NB1, NB2, NB3, NB4, and NB5.

Temporal Representation:

The samples were taken in May 2001.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCRWP QAPP.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99493, Mercury	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

636

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

State Mussel Watch Program Data 1977-2000; Winter 2007-Winter 2009. State Water Resources Control Board

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from 15 sites.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in September 1994, June 1996, and August 1997.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Study was conducted by the California Department of Fish and Game.QA/QC information is contained in the document.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99493, Mercury	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81979

Pollutant:

Mercury

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Shellfish

Beneficial Use:

Shellfish Harvesting

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Shellfish surveys

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

Evaluation Guideline:

The USEPA 304(a) recommended water quality criterion for concentrations of methylmercury in shellfish tissue (wet weight) is 0.2 ppm. (Brodberg, R.K., and G.A. Pollock, 1999; USEPA, 2001)

Guideline Reference:

Prevalence of Selected Target Chemical Contaminants in Sport Fish From Two California Lakes: Public health designed screening study. Sacramento, CA: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Criterion for the Protection of Human Health: Methylmercury. Final. United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Science and Technology Office of Water. EPA-823-R-01-001. January 2001

Spatial Representation:

Samples are collected by hand from three sub-locations for each site. The composite sample was collected from site NHPB.

Temporal Representation:

Representative samples of locally abundant species were collected during the winter on 1/19/2008

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	99615	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Mirex
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 3.1 and 3.5 of the Listing Policy. Under sections 3.1 and 3.5 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the sample(s) could be assessed since the reporting limit was above the evaluation guideline. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used DOES NOT satisfy the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the sample(s) could be assessed since the reporting limit was above the evaluation guideline and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99615, Mirex	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81981

Pollutant:

Mirex

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Shellfish

Beneficial Use:

Shellfish Harvesting

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Shellfish surveys

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

The detected not quantifiable result was not included in the assessment since the reporting limit was above the evaluation guideline. MDL were provided by NOAA Federal and RL were calculated by multiplying 3.18 by the MDL.

Data Reference:

State Mussel Watch Program Data 1977-2000; Winter 2007-Winter 2009. State Water Resources Control Board

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

Evaluation Guideline:

The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for mirex in shellfish tissue is 0.43 ppb. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 21 g/day. (Brodberg, R.K., and G.A. Pollock, 1999; Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008; OEHHA, 1992)

Guideline Reference:

Prevalence of Selected Target Chemical Contaminants in Sport Fish From Two California Lakes: Public health designed screening study. Sacramento, CA: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment

Guideline Reference:

Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene

Guideline Reference:

Expedited Cancer Potency Values and Proposed Regulatory Levels for Certain Proposition 65 Carcinogens.

Spatial Representation:

Samples are collected by hand from three sub-locations for each site. The composite sample was collected from site NHPB.

Temporal Representation:

Representative samples of locally abundant species were collected during the winter on 1/19/2008

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	68661	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Nickel
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Currently, Newport Bay, upper, is listed for metals. It is not possible, in a general listing, to determine which specific metal could be causing or contributing to a water quality impacts. There is sufficient justification for removing the general listings for metals from the 303(d) list and replace these general listings with the specific metals when found to be exceeding. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 91 samples exceed the CTR saltwater chronic water quality objective. Although sediment toxicity has been documented in this water body, it cannot be associated with this pollutant since there is no applicable guideline available for evaluating this pollutant in sediment. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of the 91 samples exceed the CTR saltwater chronic water quality objective and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Although sediment toxicity has been documented in this water body, it cannot be associated with this pollutant since there is no applicable guideline available for evaluating this pollutant in sediment. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 68661, Nickel	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

636

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from 15 sites.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in September 1994, June 1996, and August 1997.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Study was conducted by the California Department of Fish and Game.QA/QC information is contained in the document.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 68661, Nickel	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

637

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009.

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were taken at stations NB1, NB2, NB3, NB4, and NB5.

Temporal Representation:

The samples were taken in May 2001.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCRWP QAPP.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 68661, Nickel	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81982

Pollutant:

Nickel

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 88 samples exceeded the water quality objective for nickel.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The concentrations of toxic pollutants in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

The California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations (4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater for nickel at 8.2 ug/L.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected quarterly starting in Fall of 2006 through June of 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Samples were collected and analyzed in accordance with the signed and certified, Quality Assurance Management Plan for the Orange County Stormwater Program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 68661, Nickel	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

613

Pollutant:

Nickel

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Sediment

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Chemical monitoring of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Two sample were collected. Number of exceedances could not be determined due to the unavailability of an applicable sediment quality guideline (Bay and Greenstein, 2003).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The concentration of toxic substance in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

There is no applicable guideline available.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected in the upper bay at NB10.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in November 2001 and March 2002.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.QA/QC samples were included in the document.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 68661, Nickel	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

612

Pollutant:

Nickel

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 3 samples exceeded the CTR criteria. (Bay and Greenstein, 2003).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The CTR saltwater chronic criteria is 8.2 ug/L (ppb) (USEPA, 2000).

The concentration of toxic substance in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Data for bacteria in various waterbodies, Feb. 2005-May 2007

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at the Upper Newport Bay site NB10.

Temporal Representation:

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	91469	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Oxygen, Dissolved
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section three (3) of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2, a single line of evidence is necessary to assess the listing status. One (1) line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero (0) of the one (1) sample exceeds the Objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero (0) of the one (1) sample exceeds the Objective and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 26 samples are needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.2. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 91469, Oxygen, Dissolved	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81983

Pollutant:

Oxygen, Dissolved

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Numeric data generated from 1 sample of Dissolved Oxygen concentrations had no exceedences.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The dissolved oxygen content of all surface waters designated as "Warm Freshwater Habitat" must be greater than 5.0 mg/L.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from the Costa Mesa Channel - fresh water station.

Temporal Representation:

One sample was collected in May 2007.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

NPDES quality assurance.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	69588	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons)
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 3.1 and 3.5 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under sections 3.1 and 3.5 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with sediment toxicity to justify adding that pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of 4 samples exceed the dry weight sediment quality guidelines and none of the 1 shellfish sample exceeds the OEHHA fish contaminant goal in shellfish. Although sediment toxicity has been documented in this waterbody, it cannot be associated with this pollutant. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of 4 samples exceeded the dry weight sediment quality guidelines and none of the 1 shellfish sample exceeded the OEHHA fish contaminant goal in shellfish and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.1. Although sediment toxicity has been documented in this waterbody, it cannot be associated with this pollutant. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69588, PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons)	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

607

Pollutant:

PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Sediment

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Chemical monitoring of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 4 samples exceeded sediment quality guideline. (Bay and GReenstein, 2003).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The concentration of toxic substance in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

The sediment quality guideline for total PAHs in 1800 ug/g (ppm) dry weight (Fairey et al., 2001).

Guideline Reference:

State Mussel Watch Program Data 1977-2000; Winter 2007-Winter 2009. State Water Resources Control Board

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected in the Upper Newport Bay at station NB10, NB10b and NB10c.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in November 2001 and March 2002.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69588, PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons)	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81984

Pollutant:

PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Shellfish

Beneficial Use:

Shellfish Harvesting

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Shellfish surveys

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

The result did not exceed the guideline. Data were reported on a dry weight basis and were converted to a wet weight basis by multiplying the dry-weight concentration by a factor of 1 minus the percentage of moisture content expressed as a decimal. The total PAHs were calculated as the potency equivalency concentration or the sum of the toxic equivalency factors multiplied by the concentrations of: Acenaphthene, Acenaphthylene, Anthracene, Benz[a]anthracene, Benzo[a]pyrene, Benzo[b]fluoranthene, Benzo[g,h,i]perylene, Benzo[k]fluoranthene, Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene, Chrysene, Fluoranthene, Fluorene, Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene, Phenanthrene, and Pyrene.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Prevalence of Selected Target Chemical Contaminants in Sport Fish From Two California Lakes: Public health designed screening study. Sacramento, CA: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment

Evaluation Guideline:

The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in shellfish tissue is 1.1 ppb. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 21 g/day for a 30 year exposure over a 70-year lifetime. This constituent is a carcinogen therefore the risk level is set to one in a million. (Brodberg, R.K., and G.A. Pollock, 1999; Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008; USEPA, 2000)

Guideline Reference:

Guideline Reference:

Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene

Guideline Reference:

Guidance for Assessing Chemical Contaminant Data for Use In Fish Advisories Volume 1: Fish Sampling and Analysis

Spatial Representation:

Samples are collected by hand from three sub-locations for each site. The composite sample was collected from site NHPB.

Temporal Representation:

Representative samples of locally abundant species were collected during the winter on 1/19/2008

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	69688	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Phenanthrene
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	No new data were assessed this cycle. The decision has not changed, and is as follows: This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Two Lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Although sediment toxicity has been documented in this water body, it cannot be associated with this pollutant. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 4 samples exceeded the PEL sediment quality guideline for Phenanthrene, and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Therefore, a link between the sediment toxicity and this pollutant in this waterbody cannot be made. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current cycle. The decision has not changed.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69688, Phenanthrene	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

608

Pollutant:

Phenanthrene

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Sediment

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Chemical monitoring of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 4 samples exceeded the PEL sediment quality guideline. (Bay and Greenstein, 2003).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The concentration of toxic substance in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

The PEL sediment quality guideline for Phenanthrene is 543.53 ng/g (ppb) (MacDonald et al., 1996) .

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected in the Upper Newport Bay at stations NB10, NB10b and NB10c.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in November 2001and March 2002.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69688, Phenanthrene	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

636

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from 15 sites.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in September 1994, June 1996, and August 1997.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Study was conducted by the California Department of Fish and Game.QA/QC information is contained in the document.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69688, Phenanthrene	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

637

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were taken at stations NB1, NB2, NB3, NB4, and NB5.

Temporal Representation:

The samples were taken in May 2001.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCRWP QAPP.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	68979	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Selenium
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 3.1 and 3.5 of the Listing Policy. Under sections 3.1 and 3.5 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Currently, Newport Bay, upper, is listed for metals. It is not possible, in a general listing, to determine which specific metal could be causing or contributing to a water quality impacts. There is sufficient justification for removing the general listings for metals from the 303(d) list and replace these general listings with the specific metals when found to be exceeding. Four lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 92 samples exceed the selenium CTR saltwater CCC criteria. None of the 23 samples exceed the selenium wet weight OEHHA screening value (OEHHA, 1999). None of the 1 sample exceeds the modified OEHHA fish contaminant goal in shellfish tissue. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 92 samples exceed the selenium CTR saltwater CCC criteria. None of the 23 samples exceed the selenium wet weight OEHHA screening value (OEHHA, 1999). These do not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 68979, Selenium	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

637

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were taken at stations NB1, NB2, NB3, NB4, and NB5.

Temporal Representation:

The samples were taken in May 2001.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCRWP QAPP.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 68979, Selenium	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

636

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009.

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from 15 sites.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in September 1994, June 1996, and August 1997.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Study was conducted by the California Department of Fish and Game.QA/QC information is contained in the document.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 68979, Selenium	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81988

Pollutant:

Selenium

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 88 samples exceeded the water quality objective for selenium.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The concentrations of toxic pollutants in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

The California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations (4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater for selenium at 71 ug/L.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected quarterly starting in Fall of 2006 through June of 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Samples were collected and analyzed in accordance with the signed and certified, Quality Assurance Management Plan for the Orange County Stormwater Program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 68979, Selenium	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81987

Pollutant:

Selenium

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Shellfish

Beneficial Use:

Shellfish Harvesting

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Shellfish surveys

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

State Mussel Watch Program Data 1977-2000; Winter 2007-Winter 2009. State Water Resources Control Board

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

Evaluation Guideline:

The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for selenium in shellfish tissue is 11 ppm. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 21 g/day. A background dietary consumption rate of 0.114 mg/day is applied for this micronutrient. (Brodberg, R.K., and G.A. Pollock, 1999; Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008)

Guideline Reference:

Prevalence of Selected Target Chemical Contaminants in Sport Fish From Two California Lakes: Public health designed screening study. Sacramento, CA: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment

Guideline Reference:

Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene

Spatial Representation:

Samples are collected by hand from three sub-locations for each site. The composite sample was collected from site NHPB.

Temporal Representation:

Representative samples of locally abundant species were collected during the winter on 1/19/2008

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 68979, Selenium	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

597

Pollutant:

Selenium

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 4 samples exceeded the CTR criteria. (Bay and Greenstein, 2003).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

From the CTR, the saltwater (chronic) criteria is 71 (USEPA, 2000).

The concentration of toxic substance in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected in the Upper Newport Bay at sites NB10, NB10b, and NB10c.

Temporal Representation:

Three sample were collected in November 2001; 2 in the water column and 1 at the surface water interface. One water column sample was collected in March 2002.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP study, considered acceptable.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 68979, Selenium	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

621

Pollutant:

Selenium

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fish tissue analysis

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 23 samples exceed the OEHHA screening value. Bay and Greenstein, 2003).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Toxic Substances shall not be discharged at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic resources to levels harmful to humans (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

The OEHHA screening value for selenium is 2 mg/kg (ppm) wet weight (OEHHA, 1999).

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Nineteen samples were collected in the outer upper bay and 4 sample in the inner upper bay.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in November 2000-January 2001, June-July 2001, and March-April and August-September 2002.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.QA/QC information was included in the document.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	70534	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Silver
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with sediment toxicity to justify adding that pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List. Currently, Newport Bay is listed for metals. It is not possible, in a general listing, to determine which specific pollutant is causing or contributing to a water quality impacts. There is sufficient justification for removing the general listings for metals from the 303(d) list and replace these general listings with the specific pollutants when found to be exceeding. Three lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 91 samples exceed the CTR saltwater chronic criteria and none of the 2 samples exceed the PEL sediment quality guideline.Although sediment toxicity has been documented in this water body, it cannot be associated with this pollutant. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 91 samples exceeded the CTR saltwater chronic criteria and none of the 2 samples exceeded the PEL sediment quality guideline. This does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Although sediment toxicity has been documented in this water body, it cannot be associated with this pollutant. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 70534, Silver	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

637

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were taken at stations NB1, NB2, NB3, NB4, and NB5.

Temporal Representation:

The samples were taken in May 2001.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCRWP QAPP.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 70534, Silver	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

615

Pollutant:

Silver

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Sediment

Matrix:

Not Specified

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Chemical monitoring of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 2 exceeded the PEL sediment quality guideline. (Bay and Greenstein, 2003).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

PEL-SQG for Marine and Estuary is 1.77 ug/g (ppm) (MacDonald, 1996).

Guideline Reference:

Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009.

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at the Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in November 2001 and March 2002.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 70534, Silver	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81989

Pollutant:

Silver

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 88 samples exceeded the water quality objective for silver.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion maximum concentrations (1-hour average) for silver to protect aquatic life in saltwater as 1.9 ug/L.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected quarterly starting in Fall of 2006 through June of 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Samples were collected and analyzed in accordance with the signed and certified, Quality Assurance Management Plan for the Orange County Stormwater Program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 70534, Silver	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

636

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from 15 sites.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in September 1994, June 1996, and August 1997.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Study was conducted by the California Department of Fish and Game.QA/QC information is contained in the document.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 70534, Silver	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

616

Pollutant:

Silver

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 3 samples were in exceedance of the CTR criteria. (Bay and Greenstein, 2003).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

CTR criteria saltwater acute criteria for silver is 1.9 ppb (USEPA, 2000).

The concentration of toxic substance in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009.

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at the Upper Newport Bay at site NB 10.

Temporal Representation:

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	98952	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Zinc
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 88 samples exceed the CTR CCC(4-day average). Currently, Newport Bay, upper, is listed for metals. It is not possible in a general listing to determine which specific metal is causing or contributing to a water quality impacts. There is sufficient justification for removing the general listings for metals from the 303(d) list and replace these general listings with the specific metals found to be exceeding. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of the 88 samples exceed the CTR CCC(4-day average) and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 98952, Zinc	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

82004

Pollutant:

Zinc

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 88 samples exceeded the water quality objective for zinc.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The concentrations of toxic pollutants in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

The California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations (4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater for zinc at 81 ug/L.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected quarterly starting in Fall of 2006 through June of 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Samples were collected and analyzed in accordance with the signed and certified, Quality Assurance Management Plan for the Orange County Stormwater Program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	75073	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	pH
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section three (3) of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2, a single line of evidence is necessary to assess the listing status. One (1) line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero (0) of the one (1) sample exceeds the Objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero (0) of the one (1) sample exceeds the Objective and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 26 samples are needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.2. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 75073, pH	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81986

Pollutant:

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Numeric data generated from 1 sample of pH data had no exceedences.

Data Reference:

Data for bacteria in various waterbodies, Feb. 2005-May 2007

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The pH of all inland surface waters shall not be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.5 as a result of waste discharges.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Data for Various Waterbodies in Region 8 and Region 9, 2006-2009.

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from the Costa Mesa Channel station.

Temporal Representation:

One sample was collected on 5/5/2007.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

NPDES quality assurance.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	99614	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Malathion
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	A Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2027
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Ten of the 91 samples exceed the maximum (instantaneous) concentration in saltwater. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Ten of the 91 samples exceed the maximum (instantaneous) concentration in saltwater and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99614, Malathion	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81978

Pollutant:

Malathion

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Ten of the 91 samples exceeded the maximum concentration for Malathion of 100 ng/L.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Marine communities, including vertebrate, invertebrate, and plant species, shall not be degraded.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

Evaluation Guideline:

The maximum (Instantaneous) concentration for Malathion in saltwater is 100 ng/L.

Guideline Reference:

Quality Criteria for Water. USEPA Office of Water and Hazardous Materials. Washington, D.C

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at sites: UNBCHB, UNBJAM, UNBNSB and UNBSDC.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected 2006 to 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	99112	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Chlordane
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	See TMDL documentation
TMDL Name:	Newport Bay Watershed Organochlorine Compounds TMDL
TMDL Project Code:	161
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA:	11/12/2013
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for removal on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 2.2 and Sections 4.1,and 4.6 of the Listing Policy. Under Sections 4.1 and 4.6 of the Policy, a minimum of one line of evidence is needed to assess listing status. Currently, Newport Bay, Upper, is listed for pesticides. It is not possible, in a general listing, to determine which specific pollutant is causing or contributing to a water quality impacts. There is sufficient justification for removing the general listings for pesticides from the 303(d) list and replace these general listings with the specific pollutants when found to be exceeding. Six lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Sediment toxicity has been documented in this water body, and enough sediment samples exceed the guideline. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List. There is sufficient justification to place it in the Being Addressed portion of the CWA 303(d) List because a TMDL has been completed and approved by RWQCB and USEPA, and is expected to result in attainment of the standard. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Three of 11 samples exceeded the sediment quality guideline and a large number of sediment samples exhibit sediment toxicity in this waterbody. This exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. The Newport Bay Watershed Organochlorine Compounds TMDL was approved by USEPA on 11/12/2013. 5. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99112, Chlordane	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81818

Pollutant:

Chlordane

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Shellfish

Beneficial Use:

Shellfish Harvesting

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Shellfish surveys

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

State Mussel Watch Program Data 1977-2000; Winter 2007-Winter 2009. State Water Resources Control Board

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Prevalence of Selected Target Chemical Contaminants in Sport Fish From Two California Lakes: Public health designed screening study. Sacramento, CA: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment

Evaluation Guideline:

The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for total chlordane in shellfish tissue is 6.0 ppb. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 21 g/day for a 30 year exposure over a 70-year lifetime. This constituent is a carcinogen therefore the risk level is set to one in a million. (Brodberg, R.K., and G.A. Pollock, 1999; Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008)

Guideline Reference:

Guideline Reference:

Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene

Spatial Representation:

Samples are collected by hand from three sub-locations for each site. The composite sample was collected from site NHPB.

Temporal Representation:

Representative samples of locally abundant species were collected during the winter on 1/19/2008

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99112, Chlordane	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

636

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from 15 sites.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in September 1994, June 1996, and August 1997.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Study was conducted by the California Department of Fish and Game.QA/QC information is contained in the document.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99112, Chlordane	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

637

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were taken at stations NB1, NB2, NB3, NB4, and NB5.

Temporal Representation:

The samples were taken in May 2001.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCRWP QAPP.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99112, Chlordane	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

610

Pollutant:

Chlordane

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Two samples were collected. The exceedances could not be determined, because there in no water column criteria applicable to alpha chlordane alone (Bay and Greenstein, 2003).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Chlordane CTR criteria for protection of human health consumption of aquatic life is 0.00059 ppb.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected in the Upper Newport Bay in the Upper Bay (NB10).

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in November 2001 and March 2002.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99112, Chlordane	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

609

Pollutant:

Chlordane

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Sediment

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Chemical monitoring of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Four samples were collected. However, none of these samples exceeded the sediment guideline (Bay et al. 2004).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

An applicable sediment guideline is not available for alpha chlordane alone but an ERM for total chlordane of 6 ng/g dw is applicable for the protection of aquatic life.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Three samples were collected in March 2002 at the Upper Newport Bay at stations NB10, NB10b and NB10c. And one sample was collected at NB10 in May 2001.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in May 2001 and March 2002.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99112, Chlordane	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

611

Pollutant:

Chlordane

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Sediment

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Chemical monitoring of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Three of 7 samples exceeded the guideline (Phillips et al. 1998).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

The sediment quality guideline dry weight is 6 ppb dw.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Lower Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

1994-1996.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

BPTCP QAPP.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	99315	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	See TMDL documentation
TMDL Name:	Newport Bay Watershed Organochlorine Compounds TMDL
TMDL Project Code:	161
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA:	11/12/2013
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 3.1, 3.5, and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under sections 3.1 and 3.5 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with sediment toxicity to justify adding that pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List. Seven lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. One of one samples exceed the 23 ppb modified OEHHHA fish contaminant goal for total DDT in shellfish. Eleven of 30 samples exceed the 100 µg/kg (ppb) wet weight OEHHA screening value. Several samples exhibited sediment toxicity. For benthic degradation; 4 of 16 samples exhibited significant biological community degradation. Three sediment samples were collected, however the number of exceedances cannot be determined due to the unavailability of an applicable sediment quality guideline for total DDT. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. One of one samples exceeded the 23 ppb modified OEHHHA fish contaminant goal for total DDT in shellfish. Eleven of 30 samples exceeded the 100 µg/kg (ppb) wet weight OEHHA screening value. For toxicity; 5 of 15 sediment samples were significantly toxic to amphipods. Fifteen of 15 pore water samples collected had significant effect in Purple Urchin larval development. One of 15 sediment water interface samples were was significantly toxic to Purple Sea Urchin. Five of 15 sediment water interface samples were significantly toxic to the fertilization test. For benthic degradation; 4 of 16 samples exhibited significant biological community degradation. Three sediment samples were collected, however the number of exceedances cannot be determined due to the unavailability of an applicable sediment quality guideline for total DDT. The tissue sample exceedances exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99315, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

601

Pollutant:

DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Sediment

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Chemical monitoring of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Three samples were collected (Bay and Greenstein, 2003).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

There is no applicable sediment quality guideline available for total DDT.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected in the Upper Newport Bay at NB10, NB10b, and NB10c.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in November 2001 and March 2002.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.The report shows evidence of lab QC such as spikes and replicates.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99315, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

603

Pollutant:

DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fish tissue analysis

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Three out of 7 samples exceeded the screening value. Filet composite samples of diamond turbot (1997) and striped mullet (2002) were collected. Individual samples of brown smoothhound shark (1998), orangemouth corvina (1999), California halibut (2000), round stingray (2001), and spotted sand bass (2002) were also collected. The guideline was exceeded in the diamond turbot, striped mullet, and spotted sand bass samples (TSMP, 2002).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Santa Ana River Basin RWQCB Basin Plan: Toxic substances shall not be discharged at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic resources to levels which are harmful to human health.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

OEHHA Screening Value 100 ng/g wet weight (Brodberg and Pollock, 1999).

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Two stations in Upper Newport Bay were sampled: at the mouth of the channel, around the corner into the preserve from the DFG Marine Studies Center (Ecological Reserve); and at the Newport Dunes Aquatic Park across from the public boat launch ramp (Newport Dunes).

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected annually 1997-2002.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Environmental Chemistry Quality Assurance and Data Report for the Toxic Substances Monitoring Program, 1996-2000. Department of Fish and Game.

Environmental Chemistry Quality Assurance and Data Report for the Toxic Substances Monitoring Program, 2001-2002. Department of Fish and Game.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99315, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

638

Pollutant:

Estuarine Bioassessments

LOE Subgroup:

Population/Community Degradation

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Four of 16 samples exhibited significant biological community degradation (Phillips et al. 1998).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: Toxic substances. The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments, biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from 16 sites.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in September 1994, June 1996, and August 1997.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information. Study was conducted by the California Department of Fish and Game.QA/QC information is contained in the document.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99315, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

602

Pollutant:

DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fish tissue analysis

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Eight of 23 samples exceeded the OEHHA screening value. Of the 23 samples; 4 of 19 were exceeding in the outer bay and 4 of 4 were exceeding in the inner bay (Allen et al. 2004).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Toxic Substances shall not be discharged at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic resources to levels harmful to humans (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

The OEHHA screening value for DDT is 100 µg/kg (ppb) wet weight (Brodberg and Pollock, 1999).

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected in inner and outer Upper Newport Bay.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in November 2000-January 2001 (0 samples exceeded), 2 samples exceeded in the outer upper bay between June-July 2001. Three samples exceeded in the outer upper bay and 4 samples exceeded in the inner upper bay between March-April & August-September 2002.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.The report shows evidence of lab QC such as spikes and replicates.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99315, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

637

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were taken at stations NB1, NB2, NB3, NB4, and NB5.

Temporal Representation:

The samples were taken in May 2001.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCRWP QAPP.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99315, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

636

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

State Mussel Watch Program Data 1977-2000; Winter 2007-Winter 2009. State Water Resources Control Board

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from 15 sites.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in September 1994, June 1996, and August 1997.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Study was conducted by the California Department of Fish and Game.QA/QC information is contained in the document.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99315, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

82001

Pollutant:

Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Shellfish

Beneficial Use:

Shellfish Harvesting

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Shellfish surveys

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

The result did exceed the guideline. Data were reported on a dry weight basis and were converted to a wet weight basis by multiplying the dry-weight concentration by a factor of 1 minus the percentage of moisture content expressed as a decimal. The total DDTs were calculated as the sum of 4,4- and 2,4- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Prevalence of Selected Target Chemical Contaminants in Sport Fish From Two California Lakes: Public health designed screening study. Sacramento, CA: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment

Evaluation Guideline:

The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for total DDT in shellfish tissue is 23 ppb. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 21 g/day for a 30 year exposure over a 70-year lifetime. This constituent is a carcinogen therefore the risk level is set to one in a million. (Brodberg, R.K., and G.A. Pollock, 1999; Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008)

Guideline Reference:

Guideline Reference:

Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene

Spatial Representation:

Samples are collected by hand from three sub-locations for each site. The composite sample was collected from site NHPB.

Temporal Representation:

Representative samples of locally abundant species were collected during the winter on 1/19/2008

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	68114	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Nutrients
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	A Source Unknown
TMDL Name:	Newport Bay Watershed Nutrient TMDL
TMDL Project Code:	156
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA:	01/01/1999
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	No new data were assessed this cycle. The decision has not changed, and is as follows: This pollutant is being considered for listing under section 2.2 of the Listing Policy. Under this section of the Policy, a minimum of one line of evidence is needed to assess listing status. The Newport Bay Watershed Nutrient TMDL was completed in 1999. This water segment-pollutant combination was moved off the section 303(d) list during the 2002 listing cycle. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination in the Water Quality Limited Segments Being Addressed portion of the section 303(d) list.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current cycle. The decision has not changed.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 68114, Nutrients	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

593

Pollutant:

Nutrients

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Not Specified

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QA Info Missing

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	68519	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	See TMDL documentation
TMDL Name:	Newport Bay Watershed Organochlorine Compounds TMDL
TMDL Project Code:	161
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA:	11/12/2013
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.1, 3.5 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under sections 3.1 and 3.5 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with sediment toxicity to justify adding that pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List. There are six lines of evidence available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Four of 30 samples exceed the OEHHA screening value, one of 1 sample exceeds the modified OEHHA fish contaminant goal in shellfish tissue. Although sediment toxicity has been documented in this water body, none of 4 samples exceeded the dry weight sediment quality guideline. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Four of 30 samples exceeded the OEHHA screening value and this does exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. One of 1 sample exceeds the modified OEHHA fish contaminant goal in shellfish tissue. Although sediment toxicity has been documented in this water body, none of 4 samples exceeded the dry weight sediment quality guideline. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 68519, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

639

Pollutant:

PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fish tissue analysis

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Three out of 7 samples exceeded. Filet composite samples of diamond turbot (1997) and striped mullet (2002) were collected. Individual samples of brown smoothhound shark (1998), orangemouth corvina (1999), California halibut (2000), round stingray (2001), and spotted sand bass (2002) were also collected. The guideline was exceeded in the orangemouth corvina, striped mullet, and spotted sand bass samples (TSMP, 2002).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Santa Ana River Basin RWQCB Basin Plan: Toxic substances shall not be discharged at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic resources to levels which are harmful to human health.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

The OEHHA screening value for polychlorinated biphenyls is 20 µg/kg (ppb) wet weight (Brodberg and Pollock, 1999).

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Two stations in Upper Newport Bay were sampled: mouth of the channel, around the corner into the preserve from the DFG Marine Studies Center (Ecological Reserve); and Newport Dunes Aquatic Park across from the public boat launch ramp (Newport Dunes).

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected annually 1997-2002.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Environmental Chemistry Quality Assurance and Data Report for the Toxic Substances Monitoring Program, 1996-2000. Department of Fish and Game.
Environmental Chemistry Quality Assurance and Data Report for the Toxic Substances Monitoring Program, 2001-2002. Department of Fish and Game.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 68519, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

600

Pollutant:

PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fish tissue analysis

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

One of the 23 samples exceeded the OEHHA screening value (TSMP, 2002).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Toxic Substances shall not be discharged at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic resources to levels harmful to humans (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

The OEHHA screening value for polychlorinated biphenyls is 20 ug/kg (ppb) wet weight (Brodberg and Pollock, 1999).

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Nineteen samples were collected from the inner bay and 4 from the outer bay.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in November 2000-January 2001, June-July 2001, and March-April & August-September 2002.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.The report shows evidence of lab QC such as spikes and replicates.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 68519, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

599

Pollutant:

PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Sediment

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Chemical monitoring of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 4 samples exceeded the sediment quality guideline (Bay and Greenstein, 2003).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The concentration of toxic substance in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

The sediment quality guideline is 400 ng/g (ppb) dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000)

Guideline Reference:

State Mussel Watch Program Data 1977-2000; Winter 2007-Winter 2009. State Water Resources Control Board

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected in the Upper Newport Bay at NB10, NB10b, and NB10c.

Temporal Representation:

One sample was collect at NB10 in November 2001, one sample was collected at each of following sites NB10, NB10b, and NB10c on March 2002.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCWRP QAPP was used.QA/QC information is included in the document.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 68519, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

81985

Pollutant:

PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Shellfish

Beneficial Use:

Shellfish Harvesting

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Shellfish surveys

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

The result did exceed the guideline. Data were reported on a dry weight basis and were converted to a wet weight basis by multiplying the dry-weight concentration by a factor of 1 minus the percentage of moisture content expressed as a decimal. Total PCB was assessed for as follows: PCB aroclors and congeners were summed separately and the sum that yielded the highest value was used for the assessment.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Prevalence of Selected Target Chemical Contaminants in Sport Fish From Two California Lakes: Public health designed screening study. Sacramento, CA: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment

Evaluation Guideline:

The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for polychlorinated biphenyls in shellfish tissue is 3.9 ppb. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 21 g/day for a 30 year exposure over a 70-year lifetime. This constituent is a carcinogen therefore the risk level is set to one in a million. (Brodberg, R.K., and G.A. Pollock, 1999; Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008)

Guideline Reference:

Guideline Reference:

Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene

Spatial Representation:

Samples are collected by hand from three sub-locations for each site. The composite sample was collected from site NHPB.

Temporal Representation:

Representative samples of locally abundant species were collected during the winter on 1/19/2008

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 68519, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

636

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from 15 sites.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in September 1994, June 1996, and August 1997.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Study was conducted by the California Department of Fish and Game.QA/QC information is contained in the document.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 68519, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

637

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Sediment

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Marine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Toxicity testing of sediments

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Narrative Water Quality Objective: The concentration of toxic substances in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses (SARWQCB, 1995).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were taken at stations NB1, NB2, NB3, NB4, and NB5.

Temporal Representation:

The samples were taken in May 2001.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

SCCRWP QAPP.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	68057	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

Pollutant:	Sedimentation/Siltation
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	Agriculture \| Channel Erosion \| Construction/Land Development \| Erosion/Siltation
TMDL Name:	Newport Bay Watershed Sediment TMDL
TMDL Project Code:	160
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA:	01/01/1999
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	No new data were assessed this cycle. The decision has not changed, and is as follows: This pollutant is being considered for listing under section 2.2 of the Listing Policy. Under this section of the Policy, a minimum of one line of evidence is needed to assess listing status. The Newport Bay Watershed Sediment TMDL was completed in 1999. This water segment-pollutant combination was moved off the section 303(d) list during the 2002 listing cycle. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination in the Water Quality Limited Segments Being Addressed portion of the section 303(d) list.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current cycle. The decision has not changed.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 68057, Sedimentation/Siltation	Region 8
Newport Bay, Upper (Ecological Reserve)

LOE ID:

594

Pollutant:

Sedimentation/Siltation

LOE Subgroup:

Remedial Program in Place

Matrix:

Not Specified

Fraction:

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

TMDL completed in 1999.

Data Reference: