Final California 2020 Integrated Report (303(d) List/305(b) Report)

Supporting Information

Regional Board 4 - Los Angeles Region

Water Body Name:	San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)
Water Body ID:	CAR4053100019980918090950
Water Body Type:	River & Stream


DECISION ID	68333	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Excess Algal Growth
Final Listing Decision:	Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Reason for Delisting:	Flaws in original listing
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This condition is being considered for delisting under section 4.7 of the Listing Policy. Under this section of the Policy, a minimum of one line of evidence is needed to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. It is not known if the algae information is backed by pollutant data. Algae should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it is not a pollutant or toxicity (section 2 of the Listing Policy). Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the Section 303(d) list.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current cycle. The decision has not changed.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 68333, Excess Algal Growth	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

2569

Pollutant:

Excess Algal Growth

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Nuisance

Matrix:

Not Specified

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Seven observations with 2 of the observations judged to be not supporting beneficial uses (LACSD, 2004b).

Data Reference:

Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Basin Plan: Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growth to the extent that such growth causes nuisance or adversely affects beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)

Evaluation Guideline:

The presence of algae in the water segment was used as the guideline. The rankings were subjective and assigned to water bodies by one person for consistency.

Guideline Reference:

Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)

Spatial Representation:

One sampling location.

Temporal Representation:

Observations made between 1990 and 1993. Samples taken in different seasons with 4 observations in 1992.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

No QA information provided.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	69740	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Selenium
Final Listing Decision:	Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Reason for Delisting:	Applicable WQS attained; reason for recovery unspecified
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for removal from the CWA section 303(d) List under section 4.1 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. 2 lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 1 of the 234 samples exceeded the CRITERIA. 12 of the 171 samples exceeded the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification for removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 1 of 234 and 12 of 171 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69740, Selenium	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

25338

Pollutant:

Selenium

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Aquatic Life Use:

Wildlife Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Zero of 86 samples exceeded the California Toxics Rule Criterion Continuous Concentration for Selenium. Water quality samples were taken and analyzed for Selenium in accordance with the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County permit monitoring and testing parameters.

Data Reference:

NPDES receiving water monitoring reports for Long Beach Water Reclamation Plant (NPDES No. CA0054119), Los Coyotes Water Reclamation Plant (NPDES No. CA0053716), Pomona Water Reclamation Plant (NPDES No. CA0053911), San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant (NPDES No. CA0053619), and Whittier Narrows Creek Water Reclamation Plant (NPDES No. CA0054011).

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

CTR Dissolved Selenium Criterion for continuous concentration (CCC) in water for the protection of aquatic life: 5 ug/L.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Five stations: RA (above WRP), RC (Below WRP), RD (end of concrete-lined portion of San Jose Creek), C1 (above SJWRP 002), C2 (below SJWRP 002)

Temporal Representation:

Grab samples were taken and analyzed on a monthly basis from August 2005 to February 2007.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data was collected in compliance with the sampling and monitoring procedures detailed in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County (NPDES No. CA0053911 and CA0053619) Monitoring and Reporting Program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Pomona Water Reclamation Plant Monitoring and Reporting Program for NPDES No. CA0053619 (County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant Monitoring and Reporting Program for NPDES No. CA0053911 (County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County)

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69740, Selenium	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

26871

Pollutant:

Selenium

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Aquatic Life Use:

Wildlife Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

One of seven samples exceeded the California Toxics Rule Criterion Continuous Concentration for Selenium. Water quality samples were taken and analyzed for Selenium in accordance with the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit monitoring and testing parameters.

Data Reference:

2006-2007 Monitoring Data (MS4 Data) for Tributaries of the San Gabriel River Watershed- CI 6948 for order no. 01-182 NPDES No. CAS004001 Municipal Storm Water and Urban Runoff Discharges within the County of Los Angeles, and the Incorporated Cities therein, Except the City of Long Beach.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

CTR Dissolved Selenium Criterion for continuous concentration (CCC) in water for the protection of aquatic life: 5 ug/L.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The Los Angeles County Department of Public Works conducted sampling at the mass emission monitoring station TS15 upstream of the confluence of Puente Creek.

Temporal Representation:

Grab samples were taken approximately six per year (four wet-weather events and two dry-weather events), from October 2003 through April 2007.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data was collected in compliance with the sampling and monitoring procedures detailed in County of Los Angeles MS4 Permit (NPDES No. CAS004001) Monitoring and Reporting Program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Monitoring and Reporting Program - CI 6948 for order no. 01-182 NPDES No. CAS004001 Municipal Storm Water and Urban Runoff Discharges within the County of Los Angeles, and the incorporated cities, except the City of Long Beach

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69740, Selenium	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

2571

Pollutant:

Selenium

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Available data indicate numeric CTR standards are violated for total selenium. There were 11 out of 78 samples that exceeded the CTR value for selenium (USEPA, 2007).

Data Reference:

Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Basin Plan: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)

Evaluation Guideline:

The CTR value for selenium (chronic) is 5 ppb.

Guideline Reference:

Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected throughout the water body.

Temporal Representation:

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data record: 2003-2006, LA RWQCB comment letter, 2006

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69740, Selenium	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88009

Pollutant:

Selenium

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Not Recorded

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

234

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

One of the 234 samples exceeded the water quality objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations (4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The CTR for selenium is 5.0 ug/L.

Guideline Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from stations POM-RD, POM-RC, SJC-C1 (SG-C1) and SJC-C2 (SG-C2).

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected monthly, intermittently from May of 2005 through December of 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The Biology Department of the San Jose Creek Water Quality Laboratory is responsible for collecting samples from receiving water stations along the San Gabriel River, Coyote Creek, San Jose Creek, Santa Clara River, and the Rio Hondo River. Data is collected for the Los Angeles Sanitation District NPDES permits. Some standard operating procedures for sampling were submitted, however no QA Project Plan was.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	100261	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Toxicity
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	A Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2019
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for removal from the CWA section 303(d) List under section 4.1 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess pollutant. Twenty of the 84 samples exceed the guideline. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 20 of 84 samples exceeded the guideline and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 100261, Toxicity	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

2570

Pollutant:

Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

TOXICITY TESTING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Available data show ambient toxicity (12 out of 60) in both wet and dry weather samples (USEPA, 2007).

Data Reference:

Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Basin Plan: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)

Evaluation Guideline:

Samples were considered toxic if (1) there was a significant difference in mean organism response between the sample and the control, and (2) the mean organism response in the test, as a percent of the control, was less than the threshold based on the 90th percentile minimum significant difference value.

Guideline Reference:

Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected throughout the water body.

Temporal Representation:

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data record: 2003-2006, SCCWRP, 2006

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 100261, Toxicity	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

96129

Pollutant:

Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Eight of the 24 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline. Toxicity data was not reported with a control, therefore anything reported as <100 (chronic) or <100% survival (acute) was considered an exceedance. Three of the thirteen fathead minnow chronic-survival and four of the thirteen -growth tests were less than 100 (these were grouped as 4 of 13 exceedances). The ceriodaphnia chronic survival and reproductive tests were reported at none of three at less than 100 (0 of 3 exceedances). Four of the eight acute tests on the fathead minnow were at less than 100% survival (4 of 8 exceedances).

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Toxic pollutants shall not be present at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic life to levels which are harmful to aquatic life or human health. No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. There shall be no bioaccumulation of pesticide

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Statistically significant difference from control using a t-test or other valid statistical tests.

Guideline Reference:

Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from location POM at sublocation RC.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected monthly from June 2006 through May of 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	70742	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	pH
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	A Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2021
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for removal from the CWA section 303(d) List under section 4.2 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. 2 lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 123 of the 345 samples exceed the OBJECTIVE. 101 of the 292 samples exceed the OBJECTIVE. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 123 of 345 and 101 and 292 samples exceeded the OBJECTIVE and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 70742, pH	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88043

Pollutant:

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

345

Number of Exceedances:

123

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

One hundred and twenty three of 345 samples exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The pH of all inland surface waters shall not be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.5 as a result of waste discharges.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from the Pom-RD, Pom-RC, SJC-C1, and SJC-C2 stations.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately twice a month from July 2005 to November 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 70742, pH	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

21152

Pollutant:

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Aquatic Life Use:

Wildlife Habitat

Number of Samples:

292

Number of Exceedances:

101

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

101 of 292 samples exceeded the Basin Plan objective for pH. Samples were taken on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis in compliance with the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts NPDES Permit (No. CA0053911 and CA0053619) Monitoring and Reporting Program.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Los Angeles RWQCB Basin Plan states that: The pH of inland surface waters shall not be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.5 as a result of waste discharges.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The data was collected from four stations: RC (Below WRP), RD (end of concrete-lined portion of San Jose Creek), C1 (above SJWRP 002), C2 (below SJWRP 002).

Temporal Representation:

Grab samples were taken and analyzed on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis from June 2004 to February 2007.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant Monitoring and Reporting Program for NPDES No. CA0053911 (County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Pomona Water Reclamation Plant Monitoring and Reporting Program for NPDES No. CA0053619 (County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County)


DECISION ID	73090	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Indicator Bacteria
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed with USEPA approved TMDL)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed with USEPA approved TMDL)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	A Source Unknown
TMDL Name:	San Gabriel River Coliform (45)
TMDL Project Code:	391
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA:	06/14/2016
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for removal from the CWA section 303(d) List under section 4.3 of the Listing Policy. Under section 4.3 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. 5 lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of 0 samples exceeded the OBJECTIVE. 11 of 12 samples exceeded the OBJECTIVE. 150 of 284 samples exceeded the OBJECTIVE. 58 of 60 samples exceeded the OBJECTIVE. 140 of 261 samples exceeded the OBJECTIVE. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 150 of 284 and 58 of 60, and 140 of 261 samples exceeded the E. coli OBJECTIVE and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met. There is sufficient justification to place this waterbody/pollutant in the Being Addressed portion of the CWA 303(d) List because a TMDL has been completed and approved by USEPA, and is expected to result in attainment of the standard. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The San Gabriel River Bacteria TMDL was approved by USEPA on 06/14/2016.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 73090, Indicator Bacteria	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

96126

Pollutant:

Enterococcus

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Eleven of the twelve samples exceeded the enterococcus objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Los Angeles County Flood Control District, 2006-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The single sample enterococcus concentration shall not exceed more than 61/100ml. Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria USEPA 1986.

Guideline Reference:

Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria - 1986. EPA440/5-84-002

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected from Upper San Jose Creek.

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected from October 2006 to April 2008.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

This data was collected by the The Los Angeles County Flood Control District for the Los Angeles County Municipal Stormwater Permit (NPDES Permit No. CAS004001. The monitoring and reporting program report was provided.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 73090, Indicator Bacteria	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88032

Pollutant:

Escherichia coli (E. coli)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Fifty-eight of the 60 geometric means exceeded the E. coli objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Geomean: The E. Coli concentration shall not exceed more than 126/100 ml. Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected from Pomona WRP Station RSW-003D (Station RD) Pomona WRP Station RSW-002D (Station RC), San Jose Creek Station RSW-001 (Station C-1), and San Jose Creek Station RSW-002 (Station C-2).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected once a month from June 2005 to May 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected under the San Jose Creek Laboratory sample collection procedures. Dec 28, 2010.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 73090, Indicator Bacteria	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

25341

Pollutant:

Indicator Bacteria

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

255

Number of Exceedances:

135

Data and Information Type:

Other Agencies/Organizations provided monitoring data

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

135 of 255 samples exceeded the single-sample limit specified in the Basin Plan. A total of 25 of 36 samples exceeded the geometric mean limit specified in the Basin Plan amendment. Samples were taken on a weekly and monthly basis in compliance with the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts NPDES Permit (NPDES No. CA0053911 and CA0053619) Monitoring and Reporting Program.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Basin Plan bacteria objectives state that to protect water contact recreation in fresh waters individual samples shall not exceed the following limits: fecal coliform density shall not exceed 400/100 ml; and E. coli density shall not exceed 235/100 ml. The bacteria objectives also establish that the geometric means of individual samples shall not exceed the following limits: the fecal coliform density shall not exceed 200/100 ml; and the E. coli density shall not exceed 126/100 ml, as a geometric mean. The bacteria objectives are found in Attachment A of Regional Board Resolution No. 2001-018.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The data was collected from four stations: RA (above WRP), RC (Below WRP), RD (end of concrete-lined portion of San Jose Creek), C1 (above SJWRP 002), C2 (below SJWRP 002).

Temporal Representation:

The grab samples were taken and analyzed on a weekly and monthly basis from June 2004 to February 2007.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant Monitoring and Reporting Program for NPDES No. CA0053911 (County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Pomona Water Reclamation Plant Monitoring and Reporting Program for NPDES No. CA0053619 (County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County)

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 73090, Indicator Bacteria	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

4147

Pollutant:

Coliform Bacteria

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Not Recorded

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006.

Data Reference:

Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d)

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Unspecified

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d)

Evaluation Guideline:

Unspecified

Guideline Reference:

Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d)

Spatial Representation:

Unspecified

Temporal Representation:

Unspecified

Environmental Conditions:

Unspecified

QAPP Information:

Unspecified

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 73090, Indicator Bacteria	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88031

Pollutant:

Escherichia coli (E. coli)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

284

Number of Exceedances:

150

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

One hundred and fifty of the 284 samples exceeded the E. coli objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The E. coli density shall not exceed 235/100 ml. Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria - 1986. EPA440/5-84-002

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected from Pomona WRP Station RSW-003D (Station RD), Pomona WRP Station RSW-002D (Station RC), San Jose Creek Station RSW-001 (Station C-1), and San Jose Creek Station RSW-002 (Station C-2).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected from June 2005 to May 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

The samples were collected under the San Jose Creek Laboratory sample collection procedures. Dec 28, 2010.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 73090, Indicator Bacteria	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

26873

Pollutant:

Indicator Bacteria

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Other Agencies/Organizations provided monitoring data

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Five of six samples exceeded the single-sample limit specified in the Basin Plan. A total of one out of one sample exceeded the geometric mean limit specified in the Basin Plan amendment. Samples were taken on a weekly and monthly basis in compliance with the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts NPDES Permit (NPDES No. CA0053911 and CA0053619) Monitoring and Reporting Program.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The Los Angeles County Department of Public Works conducted sampling at the mass emission monitoring station TS15 upstream of the confluence of Puente Creek.

Temporal Representation:

Grab samples were taken approximately six per year (four wet-weather events and two dry-weather events), from October 2003 through April 2007.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data was collected in compliance with the sampling and monitoring procedures detailed in County of Los Angeles MS4 Permit (NPDES No. CAS004001) Monitoring and Reporting Program.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	96951	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Aluminum
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 19 of the 76 samples exceeded the CRITERION. Pursuant to Section 304(a) of the Clean Water Act, U.S. EPA is intending to release updated National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Aluminum (Al) in spring 2017. Therefore, the Los Angeles Water Board is not recommending listing waterbodies for Al in the current listing cycle and is planning to use the updated criteria in the 2022 listing cycle.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 96951, Aluminum	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88021

Pollutant:

Aluminum

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Not Recorded

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Nineteen of 76 samples exceeded the water quality objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

National Recommended Water Quality Criteria Continuous Concentrations are intended protect aquatic organisms from chronic exposures (expressed as 4-day average concentration) in freshwater. The evaluation guideline for aluminum is 87 ug/L to protect warm freshwater habitat.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from stations POM-RD, POM-RC, SJC-C1 (SG-C1) and SJC-C2 (SG-C2).

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected monthly, intermittently from May of 2005 through December of 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	96952	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Arsenic
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of the 165 samples exceeded the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 165 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 96952, Arsenic	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88022

Pollutant:

Arsenic

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Not Recorded

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

165

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 165 samples exceeded the water quality objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations (4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The CTR for arsenic is 150 ug/L.

Guideline Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from stations POM-RD, POM-RC, SJC-C1 (SG-C1) and SJC-C2 (SG-C2).

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected monthly, intermittently from May of 2005 through December of 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	100138	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Benthic Community Effects
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	Benthic Community Effects is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 3.9 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.9, an additional line of evidence associating the Benthic Community Effects with a water or sediment concentration of pollutants is necessary to assess listing status. The one sample collected had an IBI score below 40. The score was 17. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing Benthic Community Effects in this water segment on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The one sample collected had an IBI score below 40. The score was 17 but this sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if standards are not met. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 100138, Benthic Community Effects	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

96125

Pollutant:

Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments

LOE Subgroup:

Population/Community Degradation

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

One sample was collected from San Jose Creek. The one sample collected had an IBI score below 40. The score was 17 (2006).

Data Reference:

Bioassessment Monitoring Report in Los Angeles County, 2006-2008.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant or animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analysis of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, bioassays of appropriate duration or other appropriate methods as specified by the State or Regional Board.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The IBI is a multi-metric assessment that employs biological metrics that respond to a habitat or water quality impairment. Each of the biological metrics measured at a site are converted to an IBI score then summed. These cumulative scores are then ranked. For the Southern California IBI, sites with scores below 40 are considered to have impaired conditions.

Guideline Reference:

Development of a Benthic Index of Biotic Integrity (B-IBI) for Wadeable Streams in Northern Coastal California and its Application to Regional 305(b) Assessment

Spatial Representation:

The sample was collected from San Jose Creek Diversion Channel Upstream of Fullerton Rd, station 4/SGLR-063.

Temporal Representation:

The sample was collected in 2006.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Qaulity assurance is good. Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) contracted Weston Solutions, Inc. to perform biological assessments. Sampling and analysis followed the protocols described in the California Stream Bioassessment Procedure (CSBP) (Harrington, 2003), and also incorporated the Southern California Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) (Ode et al., 2005).

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	96953	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Cadmium
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of the 171 samples exceeded the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 171 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 96953, Cadmium	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88023

Pollutant:

Cadmium

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Not Recorded

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

171

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 171 samples exceeded the hardness adjusted water quality objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations (4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The criterion in freshwater is hardness dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness dependent formula for the metals criterion. If no hardness data were available, a value of 100 mg/L was used.

Guideline Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from stations POM-RD, POM-RC, SJC-C1 (SG-C1) and SJC-C2 (SG-C2).

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected monthly, intermittently from May of 2005 through December of 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	100219	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Chromium
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. 3 lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of 171 samples exceeded the CRITERIA. 0 of 161 samples exceeded the CRITERIA. 0 of 50 samples exceeded the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 171, 0 of 161 and 0 of 50 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 100219, Chromium	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88024

Pollutant:

Chromium

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Not Recorded

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

171

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 171 samples exceeded the hardness adjusted water quality objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations for dissolved trivalent chromium to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The trivalent chromium criterion in freshwater is hardness dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness dependent formula for the metals criterion.

Guideline Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from stations POM-RD, POM-RC, SJC-C1 (SG-C1) and SJC-C2 (SG-C2).

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected monthly, intermittently from May of 2005 through December of 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 100219, Chromium	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88025

Pollutant:

Chromium, hexavalent

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Not Recorded

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

161

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Zero of the 161 samples exceeded the water quality objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations (4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The CTR for hexavalent chromium is 11 ug/L.

Guideline Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from stations POM-RD, POM-RC, SJC-C1 (SG-C1) and SJC-C2 (SG-C2).

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected monthly, intermittently from May of 2005 through December of 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 100219, Chromium	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

96128

Pollutant:

Chromium, trivalent

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 50 samples exceeded the criteria of 11 ug/L.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations (4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The CTR for hexavalent chromium is 11 ug/L.

Guideline Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from South San Jose Creek (Los Angeles County)from one sample station POM-RC also called SJC-RC.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected monthly from June 2006 through May of 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	97009	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Copper
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 1 of the 205 samples exceeded the criteria. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 1 of 205 samples exceeded the criteria and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97009, Copper	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88026

Pollutant:

Copper

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Not Recorded

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

205

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

One of 205 samples exceeded the hardness adjusted water quality objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from stations POM-RD, POM-RC, SJC-C1 (SG-C1) and SJC-C2 (SG-C2).

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected monthly, intermittently from May of 2005 through December of 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	97010	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Diazinon
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of the 6 samples exceeded the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of the 6 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using Table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97010, Diazinon	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88027

Pollutant:

Diazinon

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

The reporting limit for the non-detect sample was 0.05 which is equal to the evaluation guideline. Six samples were <0.05 ug/l which is below the guideline.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Region 4 Basin Plan objective is "No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses."

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The screening criteria is 0.05 ug/L, chronic 4-day average. Water quality criteria for Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game.

Guideline Reference:

Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game

Spatial Representation:

A total of four samples were collected at SJC_POM_RD, SJC_POM-RC, SJC_SJC_C-1, and SJC_SJC_C-2 sampling locations (one from each location). Location Description: SJC_POM_RD = Pomona WRP Station RSW-003D (Station RD) SJC_SJC_C-1 = San Jose Creek Station RSW-001 (Station C-1) SJC_SJC_C-2 = San Jose Creek Station RSW-002 (Station C-2)

Temporal Representation:

Two water sample were collected in 02/03/2009 and 12/02/2009 at SJC_POM_RD. One sample was collected in 2/16/2010 at SJC_SJC_C-1. One sample was collected in 2/16/2010 at SJC_SJC_C-2.

Environmental Conditions:

There was no special environmental conditions reported.

QAPP Information:

An excel spreadsheet of laboratory information called "LIMS" which gave reporting limits for each analyte evaluated accompanied each data package.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	97949	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Endosulfan
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of the 8 samples exceeded the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of the 8 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using Table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97949, Endosulfan	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88028

Pollutant:

alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the four samples exceeded the water quality criteria/objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Region 4 Basin Plan objective is "No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses."

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The California Toxic Rule criteria fresh aquatic life protection continuous concentration (4-day average)is 0.056 ug/L. THE CRITERIA FOR ENDOSULFAN I WAS USED HERE.

Guideline Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Spatial Representation:

A total of three samples were collected at SJC_POM_RD,SJC_POM-RC, SJC_SJC_C-1, and SJC_SJC_C-2 sampling locations (one from each location). Location Description: SJC_POM_RD = Pomona WRP Station RSW-003D (Station RD), SJC_POM-RC = Pomona WRP Station RSW-002D (Station RC), SJC_SJC_C-1 = San Jose Creek Station RSW-001 (Station C-1) SJC_SJC_C-2 = San Jose Creek Station RSW-002 (Station C-2)

Temporal Representation:

One water sample was collected on 12/02/2009 at SJC_POM_RD. One water sample was collected on 12/02/2009 at SJC_POM_RC. One water sample was collected on 02/16/2010 at SJC_SJC_C1. One water sample was collected on 02/16/2010 at SJC_SJC_-C2.

Environmental Conditions:

There was no special environmental conditions reported.

QAPP Information:

An excel spreadsheet of laboratory information called "LIMS" which gave reporting limits for each analyte evaluated accompanied each data package.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97949, Endosulfan	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88029

Pollutant:

beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the four samples exceeded the water quality criteria/objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Region 4 Basin Plan objective is "No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses."

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The California Toxic Rule criteria fresh aquatic life protection continuous concentration (4-day average)is 0.056 ug/L. THE CRITERIA FOR ENDOSULFAN II WAS USED HERE.

Guideline Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Spatial Representation:

A total of four samples were collected at SJC_POM_RD, SJC_POM-RC, SJC_SJC_C-1, and SJC_SJC_C-2 sampling locations (one from each location). Location Description: SJC_POM_RD = Pomona WRP Station RSW-003D (Station RD), SJC_POM-RC = Pomona WRP Station RSW-002D (Station RC), SJC_SJC_C-1 = San Jose Creek Station RSW-001 (Station C-1), SJC_SJC_C-2 = San Jose Creek Station RSW-002 (Station C-2)

Temporal Representation:

Environmental Conditions:

There was no special environmental conditions reported.

QAPP Information:

An excel spreadsheet of laboratory information called "LIMS" which gave reporting limits for each analyte evaluated accompanied each data package.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	98001	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Endrin
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of the 4 samples exceeded the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of the 4 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using Table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 98001, Endrin	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88030

Pollutant:

Endrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 4 samples exceeded the water quality criteria/objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Region 4 Basin Plan objective is "No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses."

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

California Toxic Rule criteria fresh aquatic life protection continuous concentration (4-day average)is 0.036 ug/L.

Guideline Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Spatial Representation:

A total of three samples were collected at SJC_POM_RD, SJC_SJC_C-1, SJC_POM-RC, and SJC_SJC_C-2 sampling locations (one from each location). Location Description: SJC_POM_RD = Pomona WRP Station RSW-003D (Station RD)SJC_SJC_C-1 = San Jose Creek Station RSW-001 (Station C-1)SJC_SJC_C-2 = San Jose Creek Station RSW-002 (Station C-2)tion RC)

Temporal Representation:

One water sample was collected in 12/02/2009 at SJC_POM_RD. One water sample was collected in 02/16/2010 at SJC_SJC_C1. One water sample was collected in 02/16/2010 at SJC_SJC_-C2.

Environmental Conditions:

There was no special environmental conditions reported.

QAPP Information:

An excel spreadsheet of laboratory information called "LIMS" which gave reporting limits for each analyte evaluated accompanied each data package.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	97923	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Heptachlor epoxide
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of the 0 sample exceeded the Aquatic Life CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of the 0 sample exceeded the CRITERIA and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using Table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97923, Heptachlor epoxide	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88033

Pollutant:

Heptachlor epoxide

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

The reporting limit for the non-detect sample was 0.01 ug/L which is greater than the water quality objective, therefore these data are not of sufficient resolution to determine if water quality standards are being achieved.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Region 4 Basin Plan objective is "No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

California Toxic Rule criteria fresh aquatic life protection continuous concentration (4-day average)is 0.0038 ug/L.

Guideline Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Spatial Representation:

A total of three samples were collected at SJC_POM_RD, SJC_POM_RC, SJC_SJC_C-1, and SJC_SJC_C-2 sampling locations (one from each location). Location Description: SJC_POM_RD = Pomona WRP Station RSW-003D (Station RD)SJC_SJC_C-1 = San Jose Creek Station RSW-001 (Station C-1)SJC_SJC_C-2 = San Jose Creek Station RSW-002 (Station C-2)tion RC)

Temporal Representation:

One water sample was collected in 12/02/2009 at SJC_POM_RD. One water sample was collected in 02/16/2010 at SJC_SJC_C1. One water sample was collected in 02/16/2010 at SJC_SJC_-C2.

Environmental Conditions:

There was no special environmental conditions reported.

QAPP Information:

An excel spreadsheet of laboratory information called "LIMS" which gave reporting limits for each analyte evaluated accompanied each data package.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	98002	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Iron
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 2 of the 142 samples exceeded the criteria. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 2 of 142 samples exceeded the criteria and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 98002, Iron	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88034

Pollutant:

Iron

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Not Recorded

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

142

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Two of the 142 samples exceeded the water quality objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

National Recommended Water Quality Criteria Continuous Concentrations are intended protect aquatic organisms from chronic exposures (expressed as 4-day average concentration) in freshwater. The evaluation guideline for iron is 1,000 ug/L to protect warm freshwater habitat.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from stations POM-RD, POM-RC, SJC-C1 (SG-C1) and SJC-C2 (SG-C2).

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected monthly, intermittently from May of 2005 through December of 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	97940	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Lead
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of the 215 samples exceeded the criteria. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 2 of 215 samples exceeded the criteria and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97940, Lead	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88035

Pollutant:

Lead

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Not Recorded

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

215

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 215 samples exceeded the hardness adjusted water quality objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from stations POM-RD, POM-RC, SJC-C1 (SG-C1) and SJC-C2 (SG-C2).

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected monthly, intermittently from May of 2005 through December of 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	97924	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Malathion
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using Table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97924, Malathion	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88036

Pollutant:

Malathion

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the two samples exceeded the water quality criteria/objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Region 4 Basin Plan objective is "No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses."

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The USEPA Nationally Recommended Criteria for fresh aquatic life protection continuous concentration (4-day average)is 0.1 ug/L.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

A total of two samples were collected at SJC_SJC_C-1, and SJC_SJC_C-2 sampling locations (one from each location). Location Description: SJC_SJC_C-1 = San Jose Creek Station RSW-001 (Station C-1) SJC_SJC_C-2 = San Jose Creek Station RSW-002 (Station C-2) tion RC)

Temporal Representation:

One water sample was collected in 02/16/2010 at SJC_SJC_C1. One water sample was collected in 02/16/2010 at SJC_SJC_-C2.

Environmental Conditions:

There was no special environmental conditions reported.

QAPP Information:

An excel spreadsheet of laboratory information called "LIMS" which gave reporting limits for each analyte evaluated accompanied each data package.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	97925	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Mercury
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of the 191 samples exceeded the criteria. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 191 samples exceeded the criteria and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97925, Mercury	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88037

Pollutant:

Mercury

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Not Recorded

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

191

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 191 samples exceeded the water quality objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

National Recommended Water Quality Criteria Continuous Concentrations (4-day average concentrations) for freshwater aquatic organisms exposure to elemental mercury is 0.77 ug/L.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from stations POM-RD, POM-RC, SJC-C1 (SG-C1) and SJC-C2 (SG-C2).

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected monthly, intermittently from May of 2005 through December of 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	97926	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Nickel
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of the 171 samples exceeded the criteria. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 171 samples exceeded the criteria and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97926, Nickel	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88038

Pollutant:

Nickel

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Not Recorded

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

171

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 171 samples exceeded the hardness adjusted water quality objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from stations POM-RD, POM-RC, SJC-C1 (SG-C1) and SJC-C2 (SG-C2).

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected monthly, intermittently from May of 2005 through December of 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	98673	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia)
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 3 of 206 samples exceeded the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 3 of 206 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 98673, Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia)	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88039

Pollutant:

Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

108

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

One of the 108 30-day averages exceeded the objective for ammonia when early life states are present in the water body. A total of 82 samples were collected. Only samples during the months when early life stages were present were assessed. A calendar month was considered as a 30-day averaging period.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Plan 30-day site specific objective for total ammonia as nitrogen is a function of pH, temperature, and the presence of early life stages. The site specific objective for San Jose Creek (Pomona WRP to confluence with San Gabriel River) has early life stages present from April 1st to September 30th.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at monitoring stations POM-RD, POM-RC, SG-C1, and SG-C2.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected monthly from June 2005 to October 2009. Only samples during the months when early life stages were present were assessed.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Samples were collected as part of an NPDES permit requirement. Receiving water data collected to represent the water body as a whole. No QAPP was submitted but an unsigned field manual was.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 98673, Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia)	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88040

Pollutant:

Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Two of the 98 30-day averages exceeded the objective for ammonia when early life states are absent in the water body. Only samples during the months when early life stages were absent were assessed. A calendar month was considered as a 30-day averaging period.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at monitoring stations POM-RD, POM-RC, SG-C1, and SG-C2.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected monthly from June 2005 to October 2009. Only samples during the months when early life stages were absent were assessed.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Samples were collected as part of an NPDES permit requirement. Receiving water data collected to represent the water body as a whole. No QAPP was submitted but an unsigned field manual was.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	97914	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Oxygen, Dissolved
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 3 of 214 samples exceeded the OBJECTIVE. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 3 of 214 samples exceeded the OBJECTIVE and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 97914, Oxygen, Dissolved	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88041

Pollutant:

Oxygen, Dissolved

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

214

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Three of 214 samples exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Dissolved Oxygen Water Quality Objective of all surface waters designated as Warm Fresh Water Aquatic Habitat shall not be depressed below 5 mg/l.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from the Pom-RD, Pom-RC, SJC-C1, and SJC-C2 stations.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately once a month from July 2005 to October 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	98728	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Parathion
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of 2 samples exceeded the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 2 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 98728, Parathion	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88042

Pollutant:

Parathion

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the two samples exceeded the water quality criteria/objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Region 4 Basin Plan objective is "No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses."

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Freshwater Aquatic Life Protection Recommended Criteria Continuous Concentration (4-day Average) is 0.013 ug/L.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

A total of two samples were collected at SJC_POM_RD, SJC_SJC_C-1, and SJC_SJC_C-2 sampling locations (one from each location). Location Description: SJC_SJC_C-1 = San Jose Creek Station RSW-001 (Station C-1) SJC_SJC_C-2 = San Jose Creek Station RSW-002 (Station C-2)

Temporal Representation:

One water sample was collected in 02/16/2010 at SJC_SJC_C1. One water sample was collected in 02/16/2010 at SJC_SJC_-C2.

Environmental Conditions:

There was no special environmental conditions reported.

QAPP Information:

An excel spreadsheet of laboratory information called "LIMS" which gave reporting limits for each analyte evaluated accompanied each data package.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	98729	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Silver
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of 171 samples exceeded the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 171 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 98729, Silver	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88010

Pollutant:

Silver

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Not Recorded

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

171

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 171 samples exceeded the hardness adjusted water quality objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion maximum concentrations for silver to protect aquatic life in freshwater (1-hour average). The silver criterion in freshwater is hardness dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness dependent formula for the metals criterion. If no hardness data were available, a value of 100 mg/L was used.

Guideline Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from stations POM-RD, POM-RC, SJC-C1 (SG-C1) and SJC-C2 (SG-C2).

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected monthly, intermittently from May of 2005 through December of 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	100312	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Temperature, water
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 42 of 301 samples exceeded the OBJECTIVE. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 42 of 301 samples exceeded the OBJECTIVE and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the following changes to the decision: The water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are not being exceeded.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 100312, Temperature, water	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88011

Pollutant:

Temperature, water

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

301

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Forty-two of 301 samples exceeded the objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

At no time shall warm freshwater habitat-designated waters be raised above 80 degrees Fahrenheit as a result of waste discharges.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from the Pom-RD, Pom-RC, SJC-C1, and SJC-C2 stations.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately twice a month from July 2005 to November 2010.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	98727	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Toxaphene
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of 0 sample exceeded the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 0 sample exceeded the CRITERIA and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 98727, Toxaphene	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88012

Pollutant:

Toxaphene

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Since the criteria is smaller than the reporting limit and method detection limit, none of samples can be counted.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Los Angeles Region Basin Plan objective is "No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses."

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Criteria Continuous Concentration (4-day Average) is 0.0002 ug/L

Guideline Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Spatial Representation:

A total of three samples were collected at SJC_POM_RD, SJC_POM_RC, SJC_SJC_C-1, and SJC_SJC_C-2 sampling locations (one from each location). Location Description: SJC_POM_RD = Pomona WRP Station RSW-003D (Station RD) SJC_SJC_C-1 = San Jose Creek Station RSW-001 (Station C-1) SJC_SJC_C-2 = San Jose Creek Station RSW-002 (Station C-2)

Temporal Representation:

One water sample was collected in 12/02/2009 at SJC_POM_RD. One water sample was collected in 02/16/2010 at SJC_SJC_C1. One water sample was collected in 02/16/2010 at SJC_SJC_-C2.

Environmental Conditions:

There was no special environmental conditions reported.

QAPP Information:

An excel spreadsheet of laboratory information called "LIMS" which gave reporting limits for each analyte evaluated accompanied each data package.

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	83092	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Zinc
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of 171 samples exceeded the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 171 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 83092, Zinc	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88013

Pollutant:

Zinc

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Not Recorded

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

171

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 171 samples exceeded the hardness adjusted water quality objective.

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected from stations POM-RD, POM-RC, SJC-C1 (SG-C1) and SJC-C2 (SG-C2).

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected monthly, intermittently from May of 2005 through December of 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	71777	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Total Dissolved Solids
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	A Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2021
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 35 of 149 samples exceeded the Basin Plan objective of 750 mg/L for TDS (water body specific: San Gabriel River watershed between Ramona Blvd. and Firestone Blvd.), and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current cycle. The decision has not changed.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 71777, Total Dissolved Solids	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

21153

Pollutant:

Total Dissolved Solids

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Aquatic Life Use:

Wildlife Habitat

Number of Samples:

149

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

35 of 149 samples exceeded the Basin Plan objective for pH. Samples were taken on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis in compliance with the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts NPDES Permit (No. CA0053911 and CA0053619)Monitoring and Reporting Program.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Los Angeles RWQCB Basin Plan objective for TDS is 750 mg/L (water body specific: San Gabriel River watershed between Ramona Blvd. and Firestone Blvd.).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The data was collected from four stations: RC (Below WRP), RD (end of concrete-lined portion of San Jose Creek), C1 (above SJWRP 002), C2 (below SJWRP 002).

Temporal Representation:

The grab samples were taken and analyzed on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis from June 2004 to February 2007.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QAPP Information Reference(s):

San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant Monitoring and Reporting Program for NPDES No. CA0053911 (County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Pomona Water Reclamation Plant Monitoring and Reporting Program for NPDES No. CA0053619 (County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County)


DECISION ID	70377	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

Pollutant:	Ammonia
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by action other than TMDL)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by action other than TMDL)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	Nonpoint Source \| Point Source
Expected Attainment Date:	2019
Implementation Action Other than TMDL:	NPDES permit for the San Gabriel and Santa Clara River watersheds. An alternative enforceable program is in place that will address ammonia water quality standards exceedances for this Reach (SWRCB, 2003). In June 1995, the seven water reclamation plants discharging in the San Gabriel River and Santa Clara River watersheds received NPDES permits containing requirements regarding compliance with the Basin Plan water quality objectives for ammonia. In accordance with these permits, the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts have been pursuing the addition of nitrification and denitrification facilities at each of these plants to comply with the ammonia objectives. By June 2003, it is expected that these new facilities will be operational and ammonia will be drastically reduced. Research facility operation shows that the monthly average ammonia concentration will fully comply with the chronic ammonia objective that is expected to be applicable in June 2003. It is probable that the majority of ammonia discharged to this water body was contributed by POTWs. Information in the record indicates that the majority (over 95%) of the ammonia in the Los Angeles River was contributed by POTWs. It is probable that the contribution in the San Gabriel River watershed is dominated by contributions from POTWs as well. Generally, concentrations of ammonia upstream of the treatment plants are much lower than downstream concentrations (up to an order of magnitude difference).
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for listing under section 2.2 of the Listing Policy. Under this section of the Policy, a minimum of one line of evidence is needed to assess listing status. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Two out of 17 samples exceed the ammonia objective, however, a remedial program other than a TMDL has been developed, approved, and is being implemented. This program is expected to result in attainment of the standard. This water segment-pollutant combination was moved off the section 303(d) list during the 2002 listing cycle. Based on the readily available information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination in the Water Quality Limited Segments Being Addressed portion of the section 303(d) list. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Two samples out of 17 total samples exceed the ammonia objective. However, a TMDL is in place to address this pollutant in this water body. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current cycle. The decision has not changed.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 70377, Ammonia	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88039

Pollutant:

Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

108

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at monitoring stations POM-RD, POM-RC, SG-C1, and SG-C2.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected monthly from June 2005 to October 2009. Only samples during the months when early life stages were present were assessed.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Samples were collected as part of an NPDES permit requirement. Receiving water data collected to represent the water body as a whole. No QAPP was submitted but an unsigned field manual was.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 70377, Ammonia	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

88040

Pollutant:

Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for Various Pollutants in Various Water Bodies in Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, 2005-2010.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Samples were collected at monitoring stations POM-RD, POM-RC, SG-C1, and SG-C2.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected monthly from June 2005 to October 2009. Only samples during the months when early life stages were absent were assessed.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Samples were collected as part of an NPDES permit requirement. Receiving water data collected to represent the water body as a whole. No QAPP was submitted but an unsigned field manual was.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 70377, Ammonia	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

2567

Pollutant:

Ammonia

LOE Subgroup:

Narrative Description Data

Matrix:

Not Specified

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

An alternative enforceable program is in place that will address ammonia water quality standards exceedances for this Reach (SWRCB, 2003).

In June 1995, the seven water reclamation plants discharging in the San Gabriel River and Santa Clara River watersheds received NPDES permits containing requirements regarding compliance with the Basin Plan water quality objectives for ammonia. In accordance with these permits, the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts have been pursuing the addition of nitrification and denitrification facilities at each of these plants to comply with the ammonia objectives. By June 2003, it is expected that these new facilities will be operational and ammonia will be drastically reduced. Research facility operation shows that the monthly average ammonia concentration will fully comply with the chronic ammonia objective that is expected to be applicable in June 2003.

It is probable that the majority of ammonia discharged to this water body was contributed by POTWs. Information in the record indicates that the majority (over 95%) of the ammonia in the Los Angeles River was contributed by POTWs. It is probable that the contribution in the San Gabriel River watershed is dominated by contributions from POTWs as well. Generally, concentrations of ammonia upstream of the treatment plants are much lower than downstream concentrations (up to an order of magnitude difference).

Data Reference:

Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QA Info Missing

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 70377, Ammonia	Region 4
San Jose Creek Reach 1 (SG Confluence to Temple St.)

LOE ID:

2568

Pollutant:

Ammonia

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Based on 30-day average concentrations of ammonia, 2 samples out of 17 total samples exceed the ammonia objective. Ambient measurements of pH and temperature (30-day averages) were used to calculate the water quality objective (LACSD, 2004b).

Data Reference:

Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

In order to protect aquatic life, ammonia concentrations in inland surface waters characteristic of freshwater shall not exceed the values calculated for the appropriate instream conditions [both pH and temperature] shown in Tables 3-1 to 3-3 [in the Basin Plan] (per U.S. EPA's most recent criteria guidance document, '1999 Update of Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia').

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Five stations.

Temporal Representation:

Data were collected between July 2003 and November 2004.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

NPDES quality assurance.

QAPP Information Reference(s):