Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 68220, Arsenic
|
Region 5 |
Silva Drain (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
70598 |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Silva Drain (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Arsenic. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for arsenic is 0.010 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Silva Drain (Merced County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Silva Drain @ Meadow Dr - 535XSDAMD] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 4/22/2008-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
Atrazine |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89055, Atrazine
|
Region 5 |
Silva Drain (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
70600 |
|
Pollutant: |
Atrazine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
14 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Silva Drain (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 14 samples exceed the criterion for Atrazine. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for atrazine is 1 ug/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Silva Drain (Merced County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Silva Drain @ Meadow Dr - 535XSDAMD] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89056, Cadmium
|
Region 5 |
Silva Drain (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
70620 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Silva Drain (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Cadmium. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for cadmium is 5 ug/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Silva Drain (Merced County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Silva Drain @ Meadow Dr - 535XSDAMD] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 4/22/2008-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
Carbofuran |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89057, Carbofuran
|
Region 5 |
Silva Drain (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
70623 |
|
Pollutant: |
Carbofuran |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
14 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Silva Drain (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 14 samples exceed the criterion for Carbofuran. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for Carbofuran is 18 ug/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Silva Drain (Merced County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Silva Drain @ Meadow Dr - 535XSDAMD] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89058, Copper
|
Region 5 |
Silva Drain (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
70624 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Silva Drain (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Copper. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California secondary maximum contaminant level for copper is 1.0 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels and Compliance. CCR Title 22 section 64449. |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Silva Drain (Merced County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Silva Drain @ Meadow Dr - 535XSDAMD] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 4/22/2008-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89059, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 5 |
Silva Drain (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
70660 |
|
Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Silva Drain (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 0 samples exceed the criterion for DDT(p,p). Fourteen samples were not used in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit was above the objective and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The criterion for total DDT to protect human health from consumption of water and organisms is 0.00059 ug/L (California Toxics Rule). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Silva Drain (Merced County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Silva Drain @ Meadow Dr - 535XSDAMD] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
Dieldrin |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89136, Dieldrin
|
Region 5 |
Silva Drain (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
70664 |
|
Pollutant: |
Dieldrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Silva Drain (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 0 samples exceed the criterion for Dieldrin. Fourteen samples were not used in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the objective and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The criterion for Dieldrin to protect human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.00014 ug/L (California Toxics Rule). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Silva Drain (Merced County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Silva Drain @ Meadow Dr - 535XSDAMD] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
Endrin |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89137, Endrin
|
Region 5 |
Silva Drain (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
70686 |
|
Pollutant: |
Endrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
14 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Silva Drain (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 14 samples exceed the criterion for Endrin. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Endrin criterion for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.76 ug/L. (California Toxics Rule, 2000) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Silva Drain (Merced County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Silva Drain @ Meadow Dr - 535XSDAMD] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
Glyphosate |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89138, Glyphosate
|
Region 5 |
Silva Drain (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
70701 |
|
Pollutant: |
Glyphosate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
14 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Silva Drain (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 14 samples exceed the criterion for Glyphosate. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for Glyphosate is 700 ug/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Silva Drain (Merced County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Silva Drain @ Meadow Dr - 535XSDAMD] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
Methoxychlor |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89139, Methoxychlor
|
Region 5 |
Silva Drain (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
70728 |
|
Pollutant: |
Methoxychlor |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
14 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Silva Drain (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 14 samples exceed the criterion for Methoxychlor. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for Methoxychlor, 30 ug/L, is incorporated by reference into the (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin Basins). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Silva Drain (Merced County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Silva Drain @ Meadow Dr - 535XSDAMD] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
Molinate |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89140, Molinate
|
Region 5 |
Silva Drain (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
70743 |
|
Pollutant: |
Molinate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
15 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Silva Drain (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 15 samples exceed the criterion for Molinate. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for Molinate is 20 ug/L . |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Silva Drain (Merced County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Silva Drain @ Meadow Dr - 535XSDAMD] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 100509, Nickel
|
Region 5 |
Silva Drain (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
70744 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Silva Drain (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Nickel. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for nickel is 0.1 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Silva Drain (Merced County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Silva Drain @ Meadow Dr - 535XSDAMD] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 4/22/2008-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrate |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89141, Nitrogen, Nitrate
|
Region 5 |
Silva Drain (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
70745 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
7 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Silva Drain (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate as N. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for nitrate (NO3 as N) is 10.0 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Silva Drain (Merced County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Silva Drain @ Meadow Dr - 535XSDAMD] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 6/19/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrite |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89142, Nitrogen, Nitrite
|
Region 5 |
Silva Drain (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
70746 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrite |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
7 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Silva Drain (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrite as N. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for nitrite (as N) is 1 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Silva Drain (Merced County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Silva Drain @ Meadow Dr - 535XSDAMD] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 6/19/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxamyl (Vydate) |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89143, Oxamyl (Vydate)
|
Region 5 |
Silva Drain (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
79655 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxamyl (Vydate) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
14 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staff assessed ILRP data for Silva Drain (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 14 samples exceed the criterion for Oxamyl. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for Oxamyl incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin Basins is 50 ug/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin Basins). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Silva Drain (Merced County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Silva Drain @ Meadow Dr - 535XSDAMD] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Selenium |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89144, Selenium
|
Region 5 |
Silva Drain (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
70774 |
|
Pollutant: |
Selenium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Silva Drain (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Selenium. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for selenium is 0.05 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Silva Drain (Merced County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Silva Drain @ Meadow Dr - 535XSDAMD] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 4/22/2008-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
Simazine |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 100510, Simazine
|
Region 5 |
Silva Drain (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
70510 |
|
Pollutant: |
Simazine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
14 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Silva Drain (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 14 samples exceed the criterion for Simazine. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California primary maximum contaminant level for Simazine is 4 ug/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Silva Drain (Merced County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Silva Drain @ Meadow Dr - 535XSDAMD] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89228, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 5 |
Silva Drain (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
70685 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
23 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Silva Drain (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 23 samples exceed the criterion for Conductivity(Us). |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California secondary maximum contaminant levels for electrical conductivity provide a range of values including a recommended level (900 uS/cm), an upper level (1,600 uS/cm) and a short-term level (2,200 uS/cm). The recommended level of 900 uS/cm was used as it is protective of all drinking water uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels and Compliance. CCR Title 22 section 64449. |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Silva Drain (Merced County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Silva Drain @ Meadow Dr - 535XSDAMD] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2007-10/2/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
Thiobencarb/Bolero |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89229, Thiobencarb/Bolero
|
Region 5 |
Silva Drain (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
70513 |
|
Pollutant: |
Thiobencarb/Bolero |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
15 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Silva Drain (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 15 samples exceed the criterion for Thiobencarb. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters designated for use as domestic or municipal supply (MUN) shall not contain concentrations of Thiobencarb in excess of 1.0 µg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Silva Drain (Merced County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Silva Drain @ Meadow Dr - 535XSDAMD] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
Total Dissolved Solids |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89230, Total Dissolved Solids
|
Region 5 |
Silva Drain (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
79654 |
|
Pollutant: |
Total Dissolved Solids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
14 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staff assessed ILRP data for Silva Drain (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 14 samples exceed the criterion for Dissolved Solids. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: At a minimum, water designated for MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the MCL specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. The secondary MCL for Total Dissolved Solids is 500 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Silva Drain (Merced County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Silva Drain @ Meadow Dr - 535XSDAMD] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2007-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Zinc |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89231, Zinc
|
Region 5 |
Silva Drain (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
70526 |
|
Pollutant: |
Zinc |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Silva Drain (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Zinc. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California secondary maximum contaminant level for zinc is 5.0 mg/L. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels and Compliance. CCR Title 22 section 64449. |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Silva Drain (Merced County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Silva Drain @ Meadow Dr - 535XSDAMD] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 4/22/2008-9/23/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0. |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89232, pH
|
Region 5 |
Silva Drain (Merced County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
79657 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
23 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staff assessed ILRP data for Silva Drain (Merced County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 23 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in East San Joaquin, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Silva Drain (Merced County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Silva Drain @ Meadow Dr - 535XSDAMD] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2007-10/2/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The Quality Assurance Project Plan by the East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, Revision 1.0 was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|