Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the listing status for this water body-pollutant combination should not change this cycle because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
|
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125602, Bifenthrin
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71785 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 0 samples exceed the criterion for Bifenthrin. Four samples were not used in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the objective and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." Aquatic life should not be affected unacceptably if the 4-day average concentration of Bifenthrin, 0.0006 ug/L, is not exceeded more than once every three years on the average (UC Davis Aquatic Life Criterion). |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125602, Bifenthrin
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
214831 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 0 samples exceed the criterion for Bifenthrin. Four samples were not used in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the objective and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic concentration goal for Bifenthrin is 0.1 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of Bifenthrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Bifenthrin |
Guideline Reference: |
Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder for previously assessed data that does not have quality assurance information but would require it under newly developed policies. These LOEs were previously assessed and approved at the Regional, State and Federal level in past cycles. The LOEs needed to be moved and/or reassessed but required this reference code for movement within the decision making database. |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the listing status for this water body-pollutant combination should not change this cycle because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125604, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71837 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 0 samples exceed the criterion for Cyfluthrin, total. Four samples were not used in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the objective and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." Aquatic life should not be affected unacceptably if the 4-day average concentration of Cyfluthrin, 0.00005 ug/L, is not exceeded more than once every three years on the average (UC Davis Aquatic Life Criterion). |
Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic life water quality criteria derived via the UC Davis method: ll. Pyrethroid insecticides. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 216:51-103. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125604, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
214844 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 0 samples exceed the criterion for Cyfluthrin, total. Four samples were not used in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the objective and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic concentration goal for Cyfluthrin is 0.2 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of Cyfluthrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Bifenthrin |
Guideline Reference: |
Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder for previously assessed data that does not have quality assurance information but would require it under newly developed policies. These LOEs were previously assessed and approved at the Regional, State and Federal level in past cycles. The LOEs needed to be moved and/or reassessed but required this reference code for movement within the decision making database. |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the listing status for this water body-pollutant combination should not change this cycle because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125605, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71838 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 0 samples exceed the criterion for Cyhalothrin, lambda. Four samples were not used in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the objective and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." Aquatic life should not be affected unacceptably if the 4-day average concentration of Cyhalothrin, 0.0005 ug/L, is not exceeded more than once every three years on the average (UC Davis Aquatic Life Criterion). |
Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic life water quality criteria derived via the UC Davis method: ll. Pyrethroid insecticides. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 216:51-103. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125605, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
214845 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 0 samples exceed the criterion for Cyhalothrin, lambda. Four samples were not used in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the objective and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic concentration goal for Lambda-cyhalothrin is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of Lambda-cyhalothrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Lambda-cyhalothrin |
Guideline Reference: |
Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder for previously assessed data that does not have quality assurance information but would require it under newly developed policies. These LOEs were previously assessed and approved at the Regional, State and Federal level in past cycles. The LOEs needed to be moved and/or reassessed but required this reference code for movement within the decision making database. |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the listing status for this water body-pollutant combination should not change this cycle because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
|
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125603, Cypermethrin
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
214846 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 0 samples exceed the criterion for Cypermethrin, total. Four samples were not used in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the objective and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic concentration goal for Cypermethrin is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of Cypermethrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Cypermethrin |
Guideline Reference: |
Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder for previously assessed data that does not have quality assurance information but would require it under newly developed policies. These LOEs were previously assessed and approved at the Regional, State and Federal level in past cycles. The LOEs needed to be moved and/or reassessed but required this reference code for movement within the decision making database. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125603, Cypermethrin
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71865 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 0 samples exceed the criterion for Cypermethrin, total. Four samples were not used in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the objective and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." Aquatic life should not be affected unacceptably if the 4-day average concentration of Cypermethrin, 0.0002 ug/L, or the 1-hour average concentration, 0.001 ug/L, is not exceeded more than once every three years on the average (UC Davis Aquatic Life Criterion). |
Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic life water quality criteria derived via the UC Davis method: ll. Pyrethroid insecticides. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 216:51-103. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Readily available data for this water body have not been used to determine standards attainment. No decision has been made regarding beneficial use support due to a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. A decision regarding the beneficial use support of this water body will be made during a future Integrated Report cycle if it is determined that this water body is classified as a Water of the United States under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the listing status for this water body-pollutant combination should not change this cycle because of a lack of clarity in the status of this water body under the Clean Water Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Pollutant: |
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 88818, 2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
79325 |
|
Pollutant: |
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
4 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staff assessed ILRP data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for 2,4,5-TP. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for 2,4,5,-TP, 2900 ug/L, is one-tenth of the median lethal concentration (LC50). The LC50 for 2,4,5,-TP is 29000 ug/L (USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database). |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/10/2005-4/11/2006. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
2,4-D (2,4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid) |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 88819, 2,4-D (2,4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid)
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
79320 |
|
Pollutant: |
2,4-D (2,4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
4 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staff assessed ILRP data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for 2, 4-D. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The EC50 for 2,4-D is 695 ug/l (USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/10/2005-4/11/2006. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Alachlor |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 88820, Alachlor
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71752 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alachlor |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
5 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
A total of 5 individual whole water samples were collected; 0 of 5 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline value of 1.64 ug/L. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." The evaluation guideline for Alachlor, 1.64 ug/L, is the EC50 for Selenastrum capricornutum (Green algae); USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database. |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/22/2009-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Aldicarb |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 100575, Aldicarb
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71753 |
|
Pollutant: |
Aldicarb |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Aldicarb. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." The evaluation guideline for aldicarb, 6.33 ug/L, is one-tenth of the median lethal concentration (LC50 = 63.3 ug/L) for Lepomis macrochirus (Bluegill sunfish); USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database. |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected intermittently between 1/3/2006 and 7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Aldrin |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 88821, Aldrin
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71781 |
|
Pollutant: |
Aldrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
7 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Aldrin. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The criterion maximum concentration to protect aquatic life in freshwater for aldrin is 1.5 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia as N, Total |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 88822, Ammonia as N, Total
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
78999 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia as N, Total |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Eleven water samples collected by Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition from Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) were analyzed for ammonia as N. The analytical results of duplicate samples (i.e., more than one sample collected from the same monitoring station and at the same date and time) were averaged before they were assessed. Therefore, there were six averaged ammonia sample values.
Four sample values were below the method detection limit and could not be used in the assessment because they do not meet the Quantification of Chemical Concentrations requirements in section 6.1.5.5 of the Listing Policy.
"When the sample value is less than the quantitation limit and the quantitation limit is greater than the water quality standard, objective, criterion, or evaluation guideline, the result shall not be used in the analysis."
Two assessed sample results exceeded the water quality objective. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
|
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
¿Waters shall not contain un-ionized ammonia in amounts which adversely affect beneficial uses. In no case shall the discharge of wastes cause concentrations of un-ionized ammonia (NH3) to exceed 0.025 mg/l (as N) in receiving waters.¿ (Tulare Lake Basin Plan) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in South San Joaquin Irrigation District, 2004-2008.
|
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected at one monitoring site on Stone Corral Irrigation Drain [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3]. |
Temporal Representation: |
A single water sample was collected on 2/12/2008. Five pairs of duplicate water samples were collected monthly between 2/22/2009 and 7/28/2009 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 88823, Arsenic
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71782 |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Arsenic. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved arsenic criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater for dissolved arsenic is 0.150 mg/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Atrazine |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 88824, Atrazine
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71783 |
|
Pollutant: |
Atrazine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Atrazine. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." The evaluation guideline for Atrazine, 43 ug/L, is a an EC50 for Lemna gibba (duckweed); USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database. |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 88895, Azinphos-methyl (Guthion)
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71784 |
|
Pollutant: |
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 0 samples exceed the criterion for Azinphos methyl. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The National Recommended Water Quality criterion for Azinphos Methyl (Guthion) for the protection of freshwater aquatic life is a maximum of 0.01 ug/l. |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Benomyl |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 88896, Benomyl
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
79267 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benomyl |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
4 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staff assessed ILRP data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for Benomyl. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
According to the USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database, the MATC for Benomyl is 2.2 ug/L. |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/10/2005-4/11/2006. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Bromacil |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report.
. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 88898, Bromacil
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71806 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bromacil |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
8 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceed the criterion for Bromacil. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The EC50 for bromacil for Lemna gibba (duckweed) is 45 ug/L (USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database). |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/3/2006-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 88899, Cadmium
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71807 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
5 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed AgWaiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceed the criterion for Cadmium. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations (4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The cadmium criterion in freshwater is hardness-dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness dependent formula for the metals criterion. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/22/2009-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Carbaryl |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 100576, Carbaryl
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71808 |
|
Pollutant: |
Carbaryl |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceed the criterion for Carbaryl. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended water quality criterion for freshwater aquatic life for carbaryl is 2.1 µg/L. |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/3/2006-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Carbofuran |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 88900, Carbofuran
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71809 |
|
Pollutant: |
Carbofuran |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
7 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Carbofuran. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The freshwater criterion maximum concentration for carbofuran is 0.5 µg/L (DFG 92-3, 1992). |
Guideline Reference: |
Hazard Assessment of the Insecticide Carbofuran to Aquatic Organisms in the Sacramento River System |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloroform |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 88903, Copper
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71835 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
5 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed AgWaiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceed the criterion for Copper. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations (4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The chromium criterion in freshwater is hardness-dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness-dependent formula for metals criteria. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/22/2009-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyanazine |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 88975, Cyanazine
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71836 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyanazine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Cyanazine. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The EC50 for Navicula pelliculosa (freshwater diatom) for cyanazine is 4.8 ug/L (USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database). |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Dacthal |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 88979, Dacthal
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
79251 |
|
Pollutant: |
Dacthal |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
7 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staff assessed ILRP data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Dacthal. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
According to the USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database, the freshwater aquatic life 1/10th LC50 for Dacthal is 660 ug/L. |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 100577, Deltamethrin
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71866 |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
3 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceed the criterion for Deltamethrin. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." The evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin, 0.02 ug/L, is the maximum acceptable toxicicant concentration (MATC) for Pimephales promelas (Fathead minnow); USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database. |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 5/26/2009-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Diazinon |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 88980, Diazinon
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71867 |
|
Pollutant: |
Diazinon |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Diazinon. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The freshwater chronic criterion value for diazinon is 0.1 ug/L, expressed as a continuous concentration (Finlayson, 2004). |
Guideline Reference: |
Water quality for diazinon. Memorandum to J. Karkoski, Central Valley RWQCB. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigation Unit, CA Department of Fish and Game |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Dichlorvos |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 88981, Dichlorvos
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
79260 |
|
Pollutant: |
Dichlorvos |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
10 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staff assessed ILRP data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 10 samples exceed the criterion for Dichlorvos. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
According to the USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database, the freshwater aquatic life MATC for dichlorvos is 7.2 ug/L. |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/10/2005-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Dicofol |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 88982, Dicofol
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71868 |
|
Pollutant: |
Dicofol |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
7 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Dicofol. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." The evaluation guideline for Dicofol, 5.9 ug/L, is the maximum acceptable toxicicant concentration (MATC) for Oncorhyncus mykiss (Rainbow trout); USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database. |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Dieldrin |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 88983, Dieldrin
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71894 |
|
Pollutant: |
Dieldrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
7 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Dieldrin. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Dieldrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.056 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Dimethoate |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89060, Dimethoate
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71895 |
|
Pollutant: |
Dimethoate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceed the criterion for Dimethoate. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." The evaluation guideline for dimethoate, 4.3 ug/L, is one-tenth of the median lethal concentration (LC50 = 43 ug/L) for Pteronarcys californica (Stonefly); USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database. |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/3/2006-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Dinoseb |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89061, Dinoseb
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
79330 |
|
Pollutant: |
Dinoseb |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
4 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staff assessed ILRP data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for Dinoseb. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for dinoseb, 4.4 ug/L, is one-tenth of the median lethal concentration (LC50). The LC50 for dinoseb is 44 ug/L (USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database). |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/10/2005-4/11/2006. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Disulfoton |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89063, Disulfoton
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71896 |
|
Pollutant: |
Disulfoton |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
3 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceed the criterion for Disulfoton. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA National Recommended Water Quality criterion for disulfoton in freshwater (0.05 ug/L) is an aquatic life maximum (instantaneous) level. |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Endosulfan sulfate |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89064, Endosulfan sulfate
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
79424 |
|
Pollutant: |
Endosulfan sulfate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
11 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staff assessed ILRP data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 11 samples exceed the criterion for Endosulfan sulfate. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endosulfan sulfate criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.028 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/10/2005-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Endrin |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89065, Endrin
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71897 |
|
Pollutant: |
Endrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Endrin. Seven samples were not used in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the objective and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Endrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.036 ug/L. (California Toxics Rule, 2000) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/3/2006-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Fenpropathrin |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89066, Fenpropathrin
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71926 |
|
Pollutant: |
Fenpropathrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
3 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceed the criterion for Fenpropathrin. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." The evaluation guideline for fenpropathrin, 0.22 ug/L, is one-tenth of the median lethal concentration (LC50 = 2.2 ug/L) for Lepomis macrochirus (Bluegill sunfish). (USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database) |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 5/26/2009-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Glyphosate |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89067, Glyphosate
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71927 |
|
Pollutant: |
Glyphosate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Glyphosate. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." The evaluation guideline for glyphosate, 5,500 ug/L, is one-tenth of the median lethal concentration (LC50 = 55,000 ug/L) for Chironimus plumosus (Midge). (USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database) |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Heptachlor |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89145, Heptachlor
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71928 |
|
Pollutant: |
Heptachlor |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 0 samples exceed the criterion for Heptachlor. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Heptachlor criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.0038 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Heptachlor epoxide |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89147, Heptachlor epoxide
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71929 |
|
Pollutant: |
Heptachlor epoxide |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 0 samples exceed the criterion for Heptachlor epoxide. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Heptachlor Epoxide criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.0038 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Indicator Bacteria |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 95926, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71925 |
|
Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Coliform, Fecal. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
In waters designated for contact recreation (REC-1), the fecal coliform concentration based on a minimum of not less than five samples for any 30-day period shall not exceed a geometric mean of 200/100 ml, nor shall more than ten percent of the total number of samples taken during any 30-day period exceed 400/100 ml. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 95926, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71898 |
|
Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
3 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 3 samples exceed the criterion for Escherichia coli. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall not contain chemical constituents in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended objective for single sample maximum allowable density of E. coli in freshwater designated beach areas is 235 MPN/100mL. |
Guideline Reference: |
Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria - 1986. EPA440/5-84-002 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/22/2009-4/22/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Lead |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89148, Lead
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71959 |
|
Pollutant: |
Lead |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
5 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed AgWaiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceed the criterion for Lead. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations (4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The chromium criterion in freshwater is hardness-dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness-dependent formula for metals criteria. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/22/2009-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH) |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89149, Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH)
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71960 |
|
Pollutant: |
Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for HCH, gamma. Seven samples were not used in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the objective and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The gamma-HCH (Lindane) criterion maximum concentration to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.95 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/3/2006-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Linuron |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89150, Linuron
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71961 |
|
Pollutant: |
Linuron |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceed the criterion for Linuron. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." The evaluation guideline for Linuron, 13.7 ug/L, is the EC50 for Navicula pelliculosa (freshwater diatom). (USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database) |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/3/2006-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Malathion |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89151, Malathion
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71962 |
|
Pollutant: |
Malathion |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 0 samples exceed the criterion for Malathion. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." Aquatic life should not be affected unacceptably if the 4-day average concentration of Malathion, 0.028 ug/L, is not exceeded more than once every three years on the average (UC Davis Aquatic Life Criterion). |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Methidathion |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89152, Methidathion
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71509 |
|
Pollutant: |
Methidathion |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
7 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Methidathion. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." The evaluation guideline for Methidathion, 0.86 ug/L, is the maximum acceptable toxicicant concentration (MATC) for Daphina magna (Water flea); USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database. |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Methiocarb |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89235, Methiocarb
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71510 |
|
Pollutant: |
Methiocarb |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceed the criterion for Methiocarb. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." The evaluation guideline for methiocarb, 43.6 ug/L, is one-tenth of the median lethal concentration (LC50 = 436 ug/L) for Oncorhyncus mykiss (Rainbow trout); USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database. |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/3/2006-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Methomyl |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89236, Methomyl
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71511 |
|
Pollutant: |
Methomyl |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
7 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Methomyl. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." The criteria continuous concentration for Methomyl in the San Joaquin River system is 0.5 ug/L (4-day average). (CDFG, 1996) |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Methoxychlor |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89237, Methoxychlor
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71512 |
|
Pollutant: |
Methoxychlor |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceed the criterion for Methoxychlor. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Total identifiable persistent chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides shall not be present in the water column at concentrations detectable within the accuracy of analytical methods approved by the Environmental Protection Agency or the Executive Officer (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/3/2006-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Methyl Parathion |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Pollutant: |
Metolachlor |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89239, Metolachlor
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71543 |
|
Pollutant: |
Metolachlor |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
5 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceed the criterion for Metolachlor. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." The evaluation guideline for Metolachlor, 10 ug/L, is an EC50 for Selenastrum capricornutum (Green algae); USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database. |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/22/2009-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Metribuzin |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 100384, Metribuzin
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71544 |
|
Pollutant: |
Metribuzin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
5 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceed the criterion for Metribuzin. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." The evaluation guideline for Metribuzin, 8.09 ug/L, is an EC50 for Selenastrum capricornutum (Green algae). (USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database) |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/22/2009-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Mirex |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89240, Mirex
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
79314 |
|
Pollutant: |
Mirex |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
7 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staff assessed ILRP data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Mirex. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The criterion continuous concentration for Mirex is 0.001 ug/l from the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Molinate |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89241, Molinate
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71545 |
|
Pollutant: |
Molinate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
5 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceed the criterion for Molinate. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." The evaluation guideline for Molinate, 600 ug/L, the maximum acceptable toxicicant concentration (MATC) for Daphnia magna (Water flea). (USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database) |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Monuron |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89242, Monuron
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
79335 |
|
Pollutant: |
Monuron |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
4 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staff assessed ILRP data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for Monuron. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for monuron, 330 ug/L, is one-tenth of the median lethal concentration (LC50). The 1/10 LC50 for monuron is 330 ug/L (USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database). |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/10/2005-4/11/2006. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89243, Nickel
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71575 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
5 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed AgWaiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceed the criterion for Nickel. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations (4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The chromium criterion in freshwater is hardness-dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness-dependent formula for metals criteria. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/22/2009-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Oryzalin |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89322, Oryzalin
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
79230 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oryzalin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staff assessed ILRP data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Oryzalin. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
According to the USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database, the aquatic life EC50 for Oryzalin is 15.4 ug/L. |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
State Water Board staff assessed ILRP data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Oryzalin. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/10/2005-1/3/2006. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Paraquat |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89062, Paraquat
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
79346 |
|
Pollutant: |
Paraquat |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
7 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staff assessed ILRP data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Paraquat. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for paraquat is the EC50 1200 ug/L. (USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database). |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 4/11/2006-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Parathion |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89323, Parathion
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71577 |
|
Pollutant: |
Parathion |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 0 samples exceed the criterion for Parathion, Ethyl. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA national ambient water quality chronic criterion (4-hour maximum) for parathion, is 0.013 µg/L, is for freshwater aquatic life. |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/22/2009-4/22/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Phorate |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment ¿ pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. However, due to schedule constraints these data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89325, Phorate
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71579 |
|
Pollutant: |
Phorate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
7 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Phorate. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." The evaluation guideline for phorate, 0.2 ug/L, is one-tenth of the median lethal concentration (LC50 = 2.0 ug/L) for Lepomis macrochirus (Bluegill sunfish). (USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database) |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Phosmet |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 100385, Phosmet
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71608 |
|
Pollutant: |
Phosmet |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
7 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceed the criterion for Phosmet. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." The evaluation guideline for Phosmet, 5.6 ug/L, is the EC50 for Daphnia magna (Water flea). (USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database) |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Prometryn |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89326, Prometryn
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71609 |
|
Pollutant: |
Prometryn |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 0 samples exceed the criterion for Prometryn. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." The evaluation guideline for Prometryn, 1 ug/L, is the EC50 for Navicula pelliculosa (freshwater diatom). (USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database) |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/22/2009-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Selenium |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89327, Selenium
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71610 |
|
Pollutant: |
Selenium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Selenium. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The selenium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.005 mg/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Simazine |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89328, Simazine
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71611 |
|
Pollutant: |
Simazine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Simazine. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." The evaluation guideline for Simazine, 90 ug/L, is the EC50 for Navicula pelliculosa (freshwater diatom). (USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database) |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Tebuthiuron |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89329, Tebuthiuron
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
79242 |
|
Pollutant: |
Tebuthiuron |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Fish Spawning |
|
Number of Samples: |
4 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staff assessed ILRP data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for Tebuthiuron. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
According to the USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database, the aquatic life EC50 for Tebuthiuron is 135 ug/L. |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/10/2005-4/11/2006. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Thiobencarb/Bolero |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89408, Thiobencarb/Bolero
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71637 |
|
Pollutant: |
Thiobencarb/Bolero |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Thiobencarb. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." The evaluation guideline for Thiobencarb, 1.4 ug/L, is a maximum acceptable toxicicant concentration (MATC) calculated for Daphnia magna (Water flea). (USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database) |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxaphene |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89409, Toxaphene
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71639 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxaphene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 0 samples exceed the criterion for Toxaphene. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Toxaphene criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.0002 ug/L. (California Toxics Rule, 2000) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/12/2008-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89410, Toxicity
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
59286 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
14 |
Number of Exceedances: |
4 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Fourteen samples were collected to evaluate water toxicity. Four of the samples exhibited significant toxicity. The toxicity tests included survival of Ceriodaphnia dubia and survival of Pimephales promelas. One sample can have multiple toxicity test results but will be counted only once. One sample is defined as being collected on the same day at the same location with the same lab sample id (if provided). |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Region 5 Basin Plan. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Toxicity is defined as a statistically significant effect in the sample exposure compared to the control using EPA-recommended hypothesis testing. For SWAMP data exceedances are counted with the significant effect code SL. SL is defined as the result being significant compared to the negative control based on a statistical test, less than stated the alpha level, AND less than the evaluation threshold. This data set reports a simple pass/fail (Yes/No) code to report toxicity that is equivalent to the SWAMP SL code. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at Stone Corral I.D. Discharge. |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected from July 2004 to July 2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Collected under the Management Plan for the South San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89410, Toxicity
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
59287 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
5 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Five samples were collected to evaluate sediment toxicity. One of the samples exhibited significant toxicity. The toxicity tests included survival of Hyalella azteca. One sample can have multiple toxicity test results but will be counted only once. One sample is defined as being collected on the same day at the same location with the same lab sample id (if provided). |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Region 5 Basin Plan. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Toxicity is defined as a statistically significant effect in the sample exposure compared to the control using EPA-recommended hypothesis testing. For SWAMP data exceedances are counted using the significant effect code: S equals significant, SG equals significantly greater and SL equals significantly lower. If a sample has any one of these codes, it will be considered an exceedance. |
Guideline Reference: |
Methods for Measuring the Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Sediment-associated Contaminants with Freshwater Invertebrates, Second Edition. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Duluth, MI , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DC EPA-600/R-99/064 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at Stone Corral I.D. Discharge. |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected from October 2004 to October 2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Collected under the Management Plan for the South San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Trifluralin |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89411, Trifluralin
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71640 |
|
Pollutant: |
Trifluralin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Ag Waiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Trifluralin. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Tulare Lake Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Tulare Lake Basin Second Edition. rev. Jan 2004 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Basin Plan states: "Where valid testing has developed 96-hour LC50 values for aquatic organisms..., the Board will consider one tenth of this value for the most sensitive species tested as the upper limit (daily maximum) for the protection of aquatic life... or [O]ther available information on the pesticide..." The evaluation guideline for Trifluralin, 1.58 ug/L, is a maximum acceptable toxicicant concentration (MATC) calculated for Oncorhyncus mykiss (Rainbow trout). USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database) |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/22/2009-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
Zinc |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89412, Zinc
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
71641 |
|
Pollutant: |
Zinc |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
5 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed AgWaiver data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceed the criterion for Zinc. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations (4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The chromium criterion in freshwater is hardness-dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness-dependent formula for metals criteria. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/22/2009-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Data for this water segment-pollutant combination were received by the State Water Resources Control Board as part of the data solicitation for the 2014 Integrated Report Cycle. These data were not assessed as part of the 2014 Integrated Report. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
Data for this water segment - pollutant combination were not assessed by RWQCB staff during the 2014 Integrated Report cycle. RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list at this time. These data will be assessed by RWQCB staff during a future Integrated Report cycle to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 89413, pH
|
Region 5 |
Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
79423 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
13 |
Number of Exceedances: |
4 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staff assessed ILRP data for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 4 of 13 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Data for Various Pollutants in Southern San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. 4th ed |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Stone Corral Irrigation Drain (Tulare County) was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Stone Corral I.D. Discharge - 558SCDSP3] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 7/22/2004-7/28/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Data for this line of evidence was collected as part of the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|