Pollutant: |
Anthracene |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 114899, Anthracene
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
135225 |
|
Pollutant: |
Anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for Anthracene from MacDonald et al., 2000a which states that the probable effect concentration for Anthrazene is 845 ug/kg. (dw = Dry Weight) |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 114900, Arsenic
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
135323 |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Arsenic . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity) for arsenic is 33 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)anthracene |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 114902, Benzo(a)anthracene
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
135604 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benz(a)anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for Benz[a]anthrazene from MacDonald et al., 2000a which states that the probable effect concentration for Benz[a]anthrazene is 1050 ug/kg. (dw = Dry Weight) |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 114901, Benzo(a)pyrene
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
135558 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benzo(a)pyrene . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for Benzo[a]pyrene from MacDonald et al., 2000a which states that the probable effect concentration for Benzo[a]pyrene is 1450 ug/kg. (dw = Dry Weight) |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 114903, Cadmium
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
135941 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cadmium . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity) for Cadmium in 4.98 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000a) |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlordane |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 114904, Chlordane
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
135832 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlordane |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chlordane . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for Chlordane from MacDonald et al., 2000a which states that the probable effect concentration for Chlordane is 17.6 ug/kg. (dw = Dry Weight) |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
Chromium |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 114919, Chromium
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
136094 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chromium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chromium . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity) for Chromium in 111 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000a) |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
Chrysene (C1-C4) |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 114905, Chrysene (C1-C4)
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
136556 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chrysene (C1-C4) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chrysene . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for Chrysene from MacDonald et al., 2000a which states that the probable effect concentration for Chrysene is 1290 ug/kg. (dw = Dry Weight) |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 114906, Copper
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
136568 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity) for copper in 149 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000a) |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 114917, Cypermethrin
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
136954 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cypermethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.3 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.3 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cypermethrin from Maund et al. (2002). |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
DDD (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane) |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
|
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127278, DDD (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane)
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
136926 |
|
Pollutant: |
DDD (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for DDD (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane) . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for Sum DDD from MacDonald et al., 2000a which states that the probable effect concentration for Sum DDD is 28 ug/kg. (dw = Dry Weight) |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
DDE (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene) |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
|
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127320, DDE (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene)
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
136716 |
|
Pollutant: |
DDE (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for DDE (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene) . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for Sum DDE from MacDonald et al., 2000a which states that the probable effect concentration for Sum DDE is 31.3 ug/kg. (dw = Dry Weight) |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
|
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127388, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
136736 |
|
Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for Sum DDT from MacDonald et al., 2000a which states that the probable effect concentration for Sum DDT is 62.9 ug/kg. (dw = Dry Weight) |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 114918, Deltamethrin
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
136703 |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.79 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.79 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for deltamethrin from Amweg et al. (2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
Fipronil Sulfide |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 114920, Fipronil Sulfide
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
137295 |
|
Pollutant: |
Fipronil Sulfide |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Fipronil Sulfide . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for fipronil sulfide is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.16 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample (Maul et al. 2008). |
Guideline Reference: |
Effect of sediment-associated pyrethroids, fipronil, and metabolites on Chironomus tentans growth rate, body mass, condition index, immobilization, and survival. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 27(12):2582-2590. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
Fipronil Sulfone |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 114921, Fipronil Sulfone
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
137365 |
|
Pollutant: |
Fipronil Sulfone |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Fipronil Sulfone . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for fipronil sulfone is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.12 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample (Maul et al. 2008). |
Guideline Reference: |
Effect of sediment-associated pyrethroids, fipronil, and metabolites on Chironomus tentans growth rate, body mass, condition index, immobilization, and survival. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 27(12):2582-2590. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
Fluoranthene |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 114907, Fluoranthene
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
137455 |
|
Pollutant: |
Fluoranthene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Fluoranthene . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity for sediment-dwelling organisms) for fluoranthene is 2,230 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
Fluorene |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 114908, Fluorene
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
137524 |
|
Pollutant: |
Fluorene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Fluorene . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for Fluorene from MacDonald et al., 2000a which states that the probable effect concentration for Fluorene is 536 ug/kg. (dw = Dry Weight) |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
Lead |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 114909, Lead
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
137576 |
|
Pollutant: |
Lead |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Lead . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity) for lead in 128 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000a) |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
Mercury |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
|
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 128175, Mercury
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
137939 |
|
Pollutant: |
Mercury |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Mercury . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity) for mercury in 1.06 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000a) |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
Naphthalene |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 114910, Naphthalene
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
138416 |
|
Pollutant: |
Naphthalene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Naphthalene . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity for sediment-dwelling organisms) for naphthalene is 561 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 114911, Nickel
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
138290 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Nickel . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity) for nickel in 48.6 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000a) |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons) |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
|
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127741, PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons)
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
138277 |
|
Pollutant: |
PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons) . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for Total PAHs from MacDonald et al., 2000a which states that the probable effect concentration for Total PAHs is 22800 ug/kg. (dw = Dry Weight) |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 114913, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
138611 |
|
Pollutant: |
PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity) for PCBs in 676 ug/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
Phenanthrene |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 114912, Phenanthrene
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
138846 |
|
Pollutant: |
Phenanthrene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Phenanthrene . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity for sediment-dwelling organisms) for phenanthrene is 1,170 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrene |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 114914, Pyrene
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
138854 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrene . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity for sediment-dwelling organisms) for pyrene is 1,520 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 114916, Pyrethroids
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
138970 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD) |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
|
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127533, Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD)
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
139127 |
|
Pollutant: |
Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD) . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for Total DDTs from MacDonald et al., 2000a which states that the probable effect concentration for Total DDTs is 572 ug/kg. (dw = Dry Weight) |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Pollutant: |
Zinc |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 114915, Zinc
|
Region 9 |
Oneonta Slough |
|
|
LOE ID: |
139402 |
|
Pollutant: |
Zinc |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Southern California Bight Project 2013 data for Oneonta Slough to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Zinc . |
Data Reference: |
Sediment, Toxicity data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 9. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, San Diego Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity) for zinc in 459 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000a) |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): B13-8002. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2013-08-05 to 2013-08-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Bight Coastal Ecology Committee. 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Marine Monitoring Survey (Bight 13) Quality Assurance Manual |
|