Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145439, Mercury
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269083 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
10 |
Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
5 of the 10 samples collected by SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends for Guadalupe River exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2011-07-08, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2012-07-05, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2013-06-26, Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2014-06-25, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2019-07-02. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205GUA020 ( Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-07-08 and 2020-07-17. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145439, Mercury
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91831 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
One sample was collected to evaluate sediment toxicity. The sample did not exhibit significant toxicity. The toxicity test included survival and growth of Hyalella azteca. One sample can have multiple toxicity test results but will be counted only once. One sample is defined as being collected on the same day at the same location with the same lab sample id (if provided). |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Region 2 Basin Plan. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Toxicity is defined as a statistically significant effect in the sample exposure compared to the control using EPA-recommended hypothesis testing. . For SWAMP data exceedances are counted with the significant effect code SL. SL is defined as the result being significant compared to the negative control based on a statistical test, less than stated the alpha level, AND less than the evaluation threshold. |
Guideline Reference: |
Methods for Measuring the Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Sediment-associated Contaminants with Freshwater Invertebrates, Second Edition. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Duluth, MI , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DC EPA-600/R-99/064 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The sample was collected at station 205GUA020. |
Temporal Representation: |
The sample was collected in June 2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145439, Mercury
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
3751 |
|
Pollutant: |
Mercury |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Tissue |
Matrix: |
Tissue |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Not Specified |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. |
Data Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Unspecified |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Unspecified |
Guideline Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Unspecified |
Temporal Representation: |
Unspecified |
Environmental Conditions: |
Unspecified |
QAPP Information: |
Unspecified |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145439, Mercury
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269082 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
10 |
Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
5 of the 10 samples collected by SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends for Guadalupe River exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2011-07-08, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2012-07-05, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2013-06-26, Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2014-06-25, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2019-07-02. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205GUA020 ( Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-07-08 and 2020-07-17. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145439, Mercury
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
274367 |
|
Pollutant: |
Mercury |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
4 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 4 of the 6 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Mercury . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for mercury is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1.06 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2018-06-27 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145439, Mercury
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
274513 |
|
Pollutant: |
Mercury |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
4 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 4 of the 6 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Mercury . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for mercury is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1.06 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2018-06-27 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145439, Mercury
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91886 |
|
Pollutant: |
Mercury |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Mercury. |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
San Francisco Bay Basin Water Quality Control Plan 2007: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity for sediment-dwelling organisms) for mercury is 1.06 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Guadalupe River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 station (205GUA020)] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 6/17/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP data collected before September 2008 followed the QAMP (2002), however there may have been overlap in QA with SWAMP QAPP (2008). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145439, Mercury
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91887 |
|
Pollutant: |
Mercury |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Mercury. |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
San Francisco Bay Basin Water Quality Control Plan 2007: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity for sediment-dwelling organisms) for mercury is 1.06 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Guadalupe River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 station (205GUA020)] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 6/17/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP data collected before September 2008 followed the QAMP (2002), however there may have been overlap in QA with SWAMP QAPP (2008). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142018, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277406 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00259 (Guadalupe River at the San Jose Airport-205R00259). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142018, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277229 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02051 (Guadalupe River Between Coleman and Taylor). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142018, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277249 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01027 (Guadalupe River at W. Rosemary St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142018, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277407 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00346 (Guadalupe River - 300 m upstream Branham Ln-205R00346). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142018, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277487 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00346 (Guadalupe River - 300 m upstream Branham Ln-205R00346). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142018, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277266 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205PS0109 (Guadalupe River below Curtner Ave.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-06-21 and 2011-06-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142018, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277250 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02051 (Guadalupe River Between Coleman and Taylor). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142018, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277248 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00771 (Guadalupe River 150 m downstream Coleman Ave-205R00771). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-06 and 2013-06-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142018, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277065 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01027 (Guadalupe River at W. Rosemary St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142018, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277048 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00259 (Guadalupe River at the San Jose Airport-205R00259). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142018, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277230 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205PS0109 (Guadalupe River below Curtner Ave.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-06-21 and 2011-06-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142018, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277049 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00771 (Guadalupe River 150 m downstream Coleman Ave-205R00771). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-06 and 2013-06-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279378 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02051 (Guadalupe River Between Coleman and Taylor). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279277 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01114 (Almaden Expressway at Koch). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-03 and 2016-05-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279507 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00771 (Guadalupe River 150 m downstream Coleman Ave-205R00771). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-06 and 2013-06-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279611 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00346 (Guadalupe River - 300 m upstream Branham Ln-205R00346). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279162 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02051 (Guadalupe River Between Coleman and Taylor). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279379 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01027 (Guadalupe River at W. Rosemary St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279160 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00259 (Guadalupe River at the San Jose Airport-205R00259). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278852 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01027 (Guadalupe River at W. Rosemary St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279674 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01114 (Almaden Expressway at Koch). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-03 and 2016-05-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279104 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00771 (Guadalupe River 150 m downstream Coleman Ave-205R00771). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-06 and 2013-06-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279532 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205PS0109 (Guadalupe River below Curtner Ave.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-06-21 and 2011-06-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279359 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00259 (Guadalupe River at the San Jose Airport-205R00259). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279158 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205PS0109 (Guadalupe River below Curtner Ave.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-06-21 and 2011-06-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279279 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00346 (Guadalupe River - 300 m upstream Branham Ln-205R00346). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278383 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01114 (Almaden Expressway at Koch). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-03 and 2016-05-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278396 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01027 (Guadalupe River at W. Rosemary St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278235 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205PS0109 (Guadalupe River below Curtner Ave.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-06-21 and 2011-06-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277887 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01114 (Almaden Expressway at Koch). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-03 and 2016-05-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277888 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205PS0109 (Guadalupe River below Curtner Ave.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-06-21 and 2011-06-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278063 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00346 (Guadalupe River - 300 m upstream Branham Ln-205R00346). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277864 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00346 (Guadalupe River - 300 m upstream Branham Ln-205R00346). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277880 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00771 (Guadalupe River 150 m downstream Coleman Ave-205R00771). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-06 and 2013-06-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277786 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02051 (Guadalupe River Between Coleman and Taylor). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278062 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00259 (Guadalupe River at the San Jose Airport-205R00259). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278044 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02051 (Guadalupe River Between Coleman and Taylor). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278043 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01027 (Guadalupe River at W. Rosemary St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278213 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00771 (Guadalupe River 150 m downstream Coleman Ave-205R00771). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-06 and 2013-06-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150940, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278336 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00259 (Guadalupe River at the San Jose Airport-205R00259). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154157, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306461 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R01114 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.392056 to 0.392056. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R01114. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/3/2016 to 5/3/2016. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154157, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306450 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R00259 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.438242 to 0.438242. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R00259. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 6/14/2012 to 6/14/2012. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154157, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269083 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
10 |
Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
5 of the 10 samples collected by SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends for Guadalupe River exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2011-07-08, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2012-07-05, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2013-06-26, Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2014-06-25, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2019-07-02. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205GUA020 ( Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-07-08 and 2020-07-17. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154157, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275744 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 5 of the 9 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2019-07-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154157, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
90712 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlordane |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of 1 samples collected exceeded the criteria for chlordane concentration (Sum of trans-Chlordane, cis-Chlordane, cis-Nonachlor, trans-Nonachlor, and Oxychlordane). |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Waters shall not contain substances in concentrations that result in the deposition of material that causes nuisance or adversely affects beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Probable Effect Concentration for Chlordane in freshwater sediments is 17.6 ug/kg(MacDonald et al. 2000). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected at the following station 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected on 6/17/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154157, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270945 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlordane |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 5 of the 6 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chlordane . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for chlordane is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 17.6 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2019-07-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154157, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280601 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Surface Water Monitoring Project data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Bifenthrin. Although a total of 4 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for bifenthrin is 0.1 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of bifenthrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Bifenthrin |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Santa Clara 27). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2014-07-07 to 2015-12-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
USEPA DPR. 2019. STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020) |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154157, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270221 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 2 of the 9 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2019-07-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154157, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306460 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R00346 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.4775 to 0.4775. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R00346. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 6/14/2012 to 6/14/2012. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154157, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306449 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205PS0109 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.684430292 to 0.684430292. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205PS0109. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 6/21/2011 to 6/21/2011. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected using Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program protocols |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154157, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306484 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R00771 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.505685 to 0.505685. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R00771. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 6/6/2013 to 6/6/2013. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154157, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306485 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R01027 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.520797 to 0.520797. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R01027. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/5/2014 to 5/5/2014. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154157, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306486 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R02051 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.319006 to 0.319006. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R02051. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/19/2015 to 5/19/2015. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141984, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281361 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed EPA National Lakes Assessment 2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205L12145 (Los Alamitos Percolation Ponds). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-07-30 and 2012-07-30 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141984, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281508 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205PS0109 (Guadalupe River below Curtner Ave.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-06-21 and 2011-06-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141984, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281291 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01027 (Guadalupe River at W. Rosemary St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141984, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281292 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02051 (Guadalupe River Between Coleman and Taylor). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141984, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281044 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00259 (Guadalupe River at the San Jose Airport-205R00259). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141984, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281378 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00346 (Guadalupe River - 300 m upstream Branham Ln-205R00346). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141984, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281729 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205PS0109 (Guadalupe River below Curtner Ave.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-06-21 and 2011-06-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141984, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281079 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01114 (Almaden Expressway at Koch). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-03 and 2016-05-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141984, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281078 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02051 (Guadalupe River Between Coleman and Taylor). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141984, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281566 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01114 (Almaden Expressway at Koch). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-03 and 2016-05-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141984, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281000 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00259 (Guadalupe River at the San Jose Airport-205R00259). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141984, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281567 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00346 (Guadalupe River - 300 m upstream Branham Ln-205R00346). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141984, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281507 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed EPA National Lakes Assessment 2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205L12145 (Los Alamitos Percolation Ponds). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-07-30 and 2012-07-30 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141984, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281077 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01027 (Guadalupe River at W. Rosemary St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141984, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281289 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00771 (Guadalupe River 150 m downstream Coleman Ave-205R00771). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-06 and 2013-06-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141984, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281045 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00771 (Guadalupe River 150 m downstream Coleman Ave-205R00771). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-06 and 2013-06-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141985, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281928 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01114 (Almaden Expressway at Koch). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-03 and 2016-05-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141985, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282544 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02051 (Guadalupe River Between Coleman and Taylor). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141985, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282210 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00346 (Guadalupe River - 300 m upstream Branham Ln-205R00346). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141985, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282601 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01114 (Almaden Expressway at Koch). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-03 and 2016-05-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141985, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282124 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00771 (Guadalupe River 150 m downstream Coleman Ave-205R00771). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-06 and 2013-06-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141985, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282005 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01027 (Guadalupe River at W. Rosemary St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141985, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282191 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00259 (Guadalupe River at the San Jose Airport-205R00259). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141985, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282087 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02051 (Guadalupe River Between Coleman and Taylor). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141985, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282032 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00346 (Guadalupe River - 300 m upstream Branham Ln-205R00346). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141985, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282645 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01027 (Guadalupe River at W. Rosemary St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141985, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282841 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00259 (Guadalupe River at the San Jose Airport-205R00259). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141985, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282685 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00771 (Guadalupe River 150 m downstream Coleman Ave-205R00771). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-06 and 2013-06-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142022, Chromium
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91783 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chromium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Chromium. |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
San Francisco Bay Basin Water Quality Control Plan 2007: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity for sediment-dwelling organisms) for chromium is 111 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Guadalupe River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 station (205GUA020)] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 6/17/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP data collected before September 2008 followed the QAMP (2002), however there may have been overlap in QA with SWAMP QAPP (2008). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142022, Chromium
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91784 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chromium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Chromium. |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
San Francisco Bay Basin Water Quality Control Plan 2007: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity for sediment-dwelling organisms) for chromium is 111 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Guadalupe River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 station (205GUA020)] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 6/17/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP data collected before September 2008 followed the QAMP (2002), however there may have been overlap in QA with SWAMP QAPP (2008). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142022, Chromium
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269083 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
10 |
Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
5 of the 10 samples collected by SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends for Guadalupe River exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2011-07-08, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2012-07-05, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2013-06-26, Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2014-06-25, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2019-07-02. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205GUA020 ( Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-07-08 and 2020-07-17. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142022, Chromium
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270837 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chromium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
6 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 6 of the 6 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chromium . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for chromium is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 111 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2018-06-27 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142022, Chromium
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270855 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chromium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
6 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 6 of the 6 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chromium . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for chromium is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 111 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2018-06-27 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142022, Chromium
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269082 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
10 |
Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
5 of the 10 samples collected by SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends for Guadalupe River exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2011-07-08, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2012-07-05, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2013-06-26, Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2014-06-25, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2019-07-02. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205GUA020 ( Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-07-08 and 2020-07-17. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142022, Chromium
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91831 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
One sample was collected to evaluate sediment toxicity. The sample did not exhibit significant toxicity. The toxicity test included survival and growth of Hyalella azteca. One sample can have multiple toxicity test results but will be counted only once. One sample is defined as being collected on the same day at the same location with the same lab sample id (if provided). |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Region 2 Basin Plan. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Toxicity is defined as a statistically significant effect in the sample exposure compared to the control using EPA-recommended hypothesis testing. . For SWAMP data exceedances are counted with the significant effect code SL. SL is defined as the result being significant compared to the negative control based on a statistical test, less than stated the alpha level, AND less than the evaluation threshold. |
Guideline Reference: |
Methods for Measuring the Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Sediment-associated Contaminants with Freshwater Invertebrates, Second Edition. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Duluth, MI , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DC EPA-600/R-99/064 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The sample was collected at station 205GUA020. |
Temporal Representation: |
The sample was collected in June 2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142019, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91790 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Cyfluthrin, total. |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
San Francisco Bay Basin Water Quality Control Plan 2007: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cyfluthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.1 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.1 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cyfluthrin from Amweg et al. (2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Guadalupe River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 station (205GUA020)] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 6/17/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP data collected before September 2008 followed the QAMP (2002), however there may have been overlap in QA with SWAMP QAPP (2008). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142019, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91789 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Cyfluthrin, total. |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
San Francisco Bay Basin Water Quality Control Plan 2007: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cyfluthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.1 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.1 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cyfluthrin from Amweg et al. (2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Guadalupe River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 station (205GUA020)] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 6/17/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP data collected before September 2008 followed the QAMP (2002), however there may have been overlap in QA with SWAMP QAPP (2008). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142019, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
283377 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Surface Water Monitoring Project data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin. Although a total of 4 samples were collected, 4 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for cyfluthrin is 0.2 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of cyfluthrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Cyfluthrin |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Santa Clara 27 (Guadalupe River at Trimble Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2014-07-07 to 2015-12-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
USEPA DPR. 2019. STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020) |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142019, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271800 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 9 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin, total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cyfluthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.1 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.1 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cyfluthrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2019-07-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142019, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
283442 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Surface Water Monitoring Project data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin. Although a total of 4 samples were collected, 4 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for cyfluthrin is 0.2 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of cyfluthrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Cyfluthrin |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Santa Clara 27 (Guadalupe River at Trimble Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2014-07-07 to 2015-12-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
USEPA DPR. 2019. STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020) |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142019, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271885 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 9 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin, total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cyfluthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.1 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.1 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cyfluthrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2019-07-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142021, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271971 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 9 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyhalothrin, Total lambda- . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lambda-cyhalothrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.44 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.44 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for lambda-cyhalothrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2019-07-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142021, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
284111 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Surface Water Monitoring Project data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Lambda-cyhalothrin. Although a total of 4 samples were collected, 4 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for lambda-cyhalothrin is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of lambda-cyhalothrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Lambda-cyhalothrin |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Santa Clara 27 (Guadalupe River at Trimble Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2014-07-07 to 2015-12-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
USEPA DPR. 2019. STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020) |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142021, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
284403 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Surface Water Monitoring Project data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Lambda-cyhalothrin. Although a total of 4 samples were collected, 4 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for lambda-cyhalothrin is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of lambda-cyhalothrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Lambda-cyhalothrin |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Santa Clara 27 (Guadalupe River at Trimble Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2014-07-07 to 2015-12-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
USEPA DPR. 2019. STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020) |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142021, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271718 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 9 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyhalothrin, Total lambda- . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lambda-cyhalothrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.44 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.44 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for lambda-cyhalothrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2019-07-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142021, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91791 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Cyhalothrin, lambda, total. |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
San Francisco Bay Basin Water Quality Control Plan 2007: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lambda-cyhalothrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.44 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.44 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for lambda-cyhalothrin from Amweg et al. (2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Guadalupe River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 station (205GUA020)] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 6/17/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP data collected before September 2008 followed the QAMP (2002), however there may have been overlap in QA with SWAMP QAPP (2008). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142021, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91857 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Cyhalothrin, lambda, total. |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
San Francisco Bay Basin Water Quality Control Plan 2007: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lambda-cyhalothrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.44 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.44 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for lambda-cyhalothrin from Amweg et al. (2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Guadalupe River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 station (205GUA020)] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 6/17/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP data collected before September 2008 followed the QAMP (2002), however there may have been overlap in QA with SWAMP QAPP (2008). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142016, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91858 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Cypermethrin, total. |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
San Francisco Bay Basin Water Quality Control Plan 2007: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cypermethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.3 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.3 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cypermethrin from Maund et al. (2002). |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Guadalupe River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 station (205GUA020)] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 6/17/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP data collected before September 2008 followed the QAMP (2002), however there may have been overlap in QA with SWAMP QAPP (2008). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142016, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91859 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Cypermethrin, total. |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
San Francisco Bay Basin Water Quality Control Plan 2007: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cypermethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.3 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.3 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cypermethrin from Maund et al. (2002). |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Guadalupe River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 station (205GUA020)] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 6/17/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP data collected before September 2008 followed the QAMP (2002), however there may have been overlap in QA with SWAMP QAPP (2008). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142016, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
283556 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Surface Water Monitoring Project data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin. Although a total of 4 samples were collected, 4 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for cypermethrin is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of cypermethrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Cypermethrin |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Santa Clara 27 (Guadalupe River at Trimble Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2014-07-07 to 2015-12-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
USEPA DPR. 2019. STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020) |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142016, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272113 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 9 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cypermethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.3 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.3 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cypermethrin from Maund et al., (2002). |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2019-07-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142016, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
283160 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Surface Water Monitoring Project data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin. Although a total of 4 samples were collected, 4 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for cypermethrin is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of cypermethrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Cypermethrin |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Santa Clara 27 (Guadalupe River at Trimble Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2014-07-07 to 2015-12-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
USEPA DPR. 2019. STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020) |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142016, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272288 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 9 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cypermethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.3 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.3 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cypermethrin from Maund et al., (2002). |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2019-07-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148256, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272488 |
|
Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
5 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 5 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the sum of DDT is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 62.9 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2019-07-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148256, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91829 |
|
Pollutant: |
Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for DDT, Total. |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
San Francisco Bay Basin Water Quality Control Plan 2007: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity for sediment-dwelling organisms) for total DDTs is 572 ug/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Guadalupe River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 station (205GUA020)] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 6/17/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP data collected before September 2008 followed the QAMP (2002), however there may have been overlap in QA with SWAMP QAPP (2008). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148256, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91830 |
|
Pollutant: |
Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for DDT, Total. |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
San Francisco Bay Basin Water Quality Control Plan 2007: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity for sediment-dwelling organisms) for total DDTs is 572 ug/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Guadalupe River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 station (205GUA020)] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 6/17/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP data collected before September 2008 followed the QAMP (2002), however there may have been overlap in QA with SWAMP QAPP (2008). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148256, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91864 |
|
Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for DDT. |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
San Francisco Bay Basin Water Quality Control Plan 2007: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity for sediment-dwelling organisms) for sum of DDT is 62.9 ug/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Guadalupe River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 station (205GUA020)] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 6/17/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP data collected before September 2008 followed the QAMP (2002), however there may have been overlap in QA with SWAMP QAPP (2008). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148256, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91865 |
|
Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for DDT. |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
San Francisco Bay Basin Water Quality Control Plan 2007: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
In freshwater sediments the probable effect concentration (predictive of sediment toxicity for sediment-dwelling organisms) for sum of DDT is 62.9 ug/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Guadalupe River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 station (205GUA020)] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 6/17/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP data collected before September 2008 followed the QAMP (2002), however there may have been overlap in QA with SWAMP QAPP (2008). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148256, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272410 |
|
Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
5 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 5 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the sum of DDT is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 62.9 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2019-07-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148256, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
276116 |
|
Pollutant: |
Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 6 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD) . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for total DDTs is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 572 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2019-07-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148256, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
276299 |
|
Pollutant: |
Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 6 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD) . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for total DDTs is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 572 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2019-07-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142020, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91867 |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Deltamethrin. |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
San Francisco Bay Basin Water Quality Control Plan 2007: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.79 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.79 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for deltamethrin from Amweg et al. (2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Guadalupe River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 station (205GUA020)] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 6/17/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP data collected before September 2008 followed the QAMP (2002), however there may have been overlap in QA with SWAMP QAPP (2008). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142020, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91866 |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Deltamethrin. |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
San Francisco Bay Basin Water Quality Control Plan 2007: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.79 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.79 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for deltamethrin from Amweg et al. (2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Guadalupe River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 station (205GUA020)] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 6/17/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP data collected before September 2008 followed the QAMP (2002), however there may have been overlap in QA with SWAMP QAPP (2008). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142020, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
283758 |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Surface Water Monitoring Project data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin. Although a total of 4 samples were collected, 4 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.000026 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic). |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Santa Clara 27 (Guadalupe River at Trimble Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2014-07-07 to 2015-12-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
USEPA DPR. 2019. STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020) |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142020, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
283756 |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Surface Water Monitoring Project data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin. Although a total of 4 samples were collected, 4 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.000026 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic). |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Santa Clara 27 (Guadalupe River at Trimble Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2014-07-07 to 2015-12-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
USEPA DPR. 2019. STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020) |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142020, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272494 |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
7 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 7 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.79 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.79 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for deltamethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2017-06-27 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142020, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272335 |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
7 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 7 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.79 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.79 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for deltamethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2017-06-27 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142001, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285738 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00346 (Guadalupe River - 300 m upstream Branham Ln-205R00346). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142001, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285904 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00771 (Guadalupe River 150 m downstream Coleman Ave-205R00771). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-06 and 2013-06-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142001, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285722 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205PS0109 (Guadalupe River below Curtner Ave.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-06-21 and 2011-06-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142001, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285849 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01114 (Almaden Expressway at Koch). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-03 and 2016-05-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142001, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286668 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-06-25 and 2020-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142001, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285737 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00259 (Guadalupe River at the San Jose Airport-205R00259). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142001, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285723 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 9 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-06-25 and 2020-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142001, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285739 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00771 (Guadalupe River 150 m downstream Coleman Ave-205R00771). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-06 and 2013-06-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142001, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286521 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205PS0109 (Guadalupe River below Curtner Ave.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-06-21 and 2011-06-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142001, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285608 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00346 (Guadalupe River - 300 m upstream Branham Ln-205R00346). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142001, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286231 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00259 (Guadalupe River at the San Jose Airport-205R00259). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142001, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285655 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02051 (Guadalupe River Between Coleman and Taylor). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142001, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285907 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01027 (Guadalupe River at W. Rosemary St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142001, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285654 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01027 (Guadalupe River at W. Rosemary St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142001, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286575 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02051 (Guadalupe River Between Coleman and Taylor). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142001, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286435 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01114 (Almaden Expressway at Koch). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-03 and 2016-05-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142027, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286543 |
|
Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Surface Water Monitoring Project data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin. Although a total of 4 samples were collected, 4 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for permethrin is 1 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of permethrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Permethrin |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Santa Clara 27 (Guadalupe River at Trimble Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2014-07-07 to 2015-12-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
USEPA DPR. 2019. STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020) |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142027, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286471 |
|
Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Surface Water Monitoring Project data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin. Although a total of 4 samples were collected, 4 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for permethrin is 1 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of permethrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Permethrin |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Santa Clara 27 (Guadalupe River at Trimble Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2014-07-07 to 2015-12-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
USEPA DPR. 2019. STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020) |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142027, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275476 |
|
Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 9 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for permethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 8.9 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 8.9 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for permethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2019-07-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142027, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275273 |
|
Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 9 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for permethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 8.9 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 8.9 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for permethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2019-07-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142027, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91824 |
|
Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Permethrin, Total. |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
San Francisco Bay Basin Water Quality Control Plan 2007: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for permethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 8.9 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 8.9 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for permethrin from Amweg et al. (2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Guadalupe River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 station (205GUA020)] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 6/17/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP data collected before September 2008 followed the QAMP (2002), however there may have been overlap in QA with SWAMP QAPP (2008). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142027, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91823 |
|
Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Permethrin, Total. |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
San Francisco Bay Basin Water Quality Control Plan 2007: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for permethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 8.9 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 8.9 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for permethrin from Amweg et al. (2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Guadalupe River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 station (205GUA020)] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 6/17/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP data collected before September 2008 followed the QAMP (2002), however there may have been overlap in QA with SWAMP QAPP (2008). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142006, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
298608 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00259 (Guadalupe River at the San Jose Airport-205R00259). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142006, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
298595 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
|
Number of Samples: |
10 |
Number of Exceedances: |
3 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 10 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-26 and 2020-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142006, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
298667 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01114 (Almaden Expressway at Koch). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-03 and 2016-05-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142006, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
298659 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00346 (Guadalupe River - 300 m upstream Branham Ln-205R00346). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142006, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
298559 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01027 (Guadalupe River at W. Rosemary St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142006, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
298718 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00771 (Guadalupe River 150 m downstream Coleman Ave-205R00771). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-06 and 2013-06-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142006, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288884 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02051 (Guadalupe River Between Coleman and Taylor). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142006, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288829 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00771 (Guadalupe River 150 m downstream Coleman Ave-205R00771). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-06 and 2013-06-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142006, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288921 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00346 (Guadalupe River - 300 m upstream Branham Ln-205R00346). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142006, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
289053 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01027 (Guadalupe River at W. Rosemary St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142006, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
289037 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00259 (Guadalupe River at the San Jose Airport-205R00259). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142006, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288799 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01114 (Almaden Expressway at Koch). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-03 and 2016-05-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142006, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288899 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
10 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 10 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-26 and 2020-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142006, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288816 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205PS0109 (Guadalupe River below Curtner Ave.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-06-21 and 2011-06-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142006, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
298756 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205PS0109 (Guadalupe River below Curtner Ave.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-06-21 and 2011-06-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142006, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
298704 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02051 (Guadalupe River Between Coleman and Taylor). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142002, pH
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287590 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01114 (Almaden Expressway at Koch). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-03 and 2016-05-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142002, pH
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287398 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00259 (Guadalupe River at the San Jose Airport-205R00259). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142002, pH
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287148 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00346 (Guadalupe River - 300 m upstream Branham Ln-205R00346). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-14 and 2012-06-14 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142002, pH
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287589 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205PS0109 (Guadalupe River below Curtner Ave.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-06-21 and 2011-06-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142002, pH
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287610 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 9 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-06-25 and 2020-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142002, pH
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287634 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02051 (Guadalupe River Between Coleman and Taylor). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142002, pH
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287280 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01027 (Guadalupe River at W. Rosemary St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142002, pH
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287279 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00771 (Guadalupe River 150 m downstream Coleman Ave-205R00771). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-06 and 2013-06-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141983, Chlordane
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270945 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlordane |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 5 of the 6 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chlordane . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for chlordane is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 17.6 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2019-07-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141983, Chlordane
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91831 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
One sample was collected to evaluate sediment toxicity. The sample did not exhibit significant toxicity. The toxicity test included survival and growth of Hyalella azteca. One sample can have multiple toxicity test results but will be counted only once. One sample is defined as being collected on the same day at the same location with the same lab sample id (if provided). |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Region 2 Basin Plan. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Toxicity is defined as a statistically significant effect in the sample exposure compared to the control using EPA-recommended hypothesis testing. . For SWAMP data exceedances are counted with the significant effect code SL. SL is defined as the result being significant compared to the negative control based on a statistical test, less than stated the alpha level, AND less than the evaluation threshold. |
Guideline Reference: |
Methods for Measuring the Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Sediment-associated Contaminants with Freshwater Invertebrates, Second Edition. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Duluth, MI , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DC EPA-600/R-99/064 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The sample was collected at station 205GUA020. |
Temporal Representation: |
The sample was collected in June 2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141983, Chlordane
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
90712 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlordane |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of 1 samples collected exceeded the criteria for chlordane concentration (Sum of trans-Chlordane, cis-Chlordane, cis-Nonachlor, trans-Nonachlor, and Oxychlordane). |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Waters shall not contain substances in concentrations that result in the deposition of material that causes nuisance or adversely affects beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Probable Effect Concentration for Chlordane in freshwater sediments is 17.6 ug/kg(MacDonald et al. 2000). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected at the following station 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected on 6/17/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141983, Chlordane
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269082 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
10 |
Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
5 of the 10 samples collected by SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends for Guadalupe River exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2011-07-08, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2012-07-05, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2013-06-26, Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2014-06-25, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2019-07-02. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205GUA020 ( Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-07-08 and 2020-07-17. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141983, Chlordane
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270828 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlordane |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
6 |
Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 5 of the 6 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chlordane . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for chlordane is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 17.6 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2019-07-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 141983, Chlordane
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269083 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
10 |
Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
5 of the 10 samples collected by SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends for Guadalupe River exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2011-07-08, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2012-07-05, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2013-06-26, Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2014-06-25, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2019-07-02. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205GUA020 ( Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-07-08 and 2020-07-17. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142015, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91831 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
One sample was collected to evaluate sediment toxicity. The sample did not exhibit significant toxicity. The toxicity test included survival and growth of Hyalella azteca. One sample can have multiple toxicity test results but will be counted only once. One sample is defined as being collected on the same day at the same location with the same lab sample id (if provided). |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Region 2 Basin Plan. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Toxicity is defined as a statistically significant effect in the sample exposure compared to the control using EPA-recommended hypothesis testing. . For SWAMP data exceedances are counted with the significant effect code SL. SL is defined as the result being significant compared to the negative control based on a statistical test, less than stated the alpha level, AND less than the evaluation threshold. |
Guideline Reference: |
Methods for Measuring the Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Sediment-associated Contaminants with Freshwater Invertebrates, Second Edition. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Duluth, MI , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DC EPA-600/R-99/064 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The sample was collected at station 205GUA020. |
Temporal Representation: |
The sample was collected in June 2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142015, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91778 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Bifenthrin. |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
San Francisco Bay Basin Water Quality Control Plan 2007: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin from Amweg et al. (2005) and Amweg and Weston (2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Guadalupe River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 station (205GUA020)] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 6/17/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP data collected before September 2008 followed the QAMP (2002), however there may have been overlap in QA with SWAMP QAPP (2008). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142015, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91777 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Bifenthrin. |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
San Francisco Bay Basin Water Quality Control Plan 2007: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin from Amweg et al. (2005) and Amweg and Weston (2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Guadalupe River was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 station (205GUA020)] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 6/17/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP data collected before September 2008 followed the QAMP (2002), however there may have been overlap in QA with SWAMP QAPP (2008). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142015, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270221 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 2 of the 9 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2019-07-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142015, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269083 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
10 |
Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
5 of the 10 samples collected by SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends for Guadalupe River exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2011-07-08, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2012-07-05, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2013-06-26, Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2014-06-25, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2019-07-02. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205GUA020 ( Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-07-08 and 2020-07-17. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142015, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280646 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Surface Water Monitoring Project data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Bifenthrin. Although a total of 4 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for bifenthrin is 0.1 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of bifenthrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Bifenthrin |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Santa Clara 27). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2014-07-07 to 2015-12-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
USEPA DPR. 2019. STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020) |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142015, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270323 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 2 of the 9 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2019-07-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142015, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269082 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
10 |
Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
5 of the 10 samples collected by SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends for Guadalupe River exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2011-07-08, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2012-07-05, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2013-06-26, Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2014-06-25, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2019-07-02. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205GUA020 ( Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-07-08 and 2020-07-17. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142015, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280601 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Surface Water Monitoring Project data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Bifenthrin. Although a total of 4 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for bifenthrin is 0.1 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of bifenthrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Bifenthrin |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Santa Clara 27). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2014-07-07 to 2015-12-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
USEPA DPR. 2019. STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020) |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142010, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269083 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
10 |
Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
5 of the 10 samples collected by SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends for Guadalupe River exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2011-07-08, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2012-07-05, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2013-06-26, Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2014-06-25, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2019-07-02. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205GUA020 ( Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-07-08 and 2020-07-17. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142010, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269082 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
10 |
Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
5 of the 10 samples collected by SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends for Guadalupe River exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2011-07-08, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2012-07-05, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2013-06-26, Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2014-06-25, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2019-07-02. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205GUA020 ( Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-07-08 and 2020-07-17. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142010, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91831 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
One sample was collected to evaluate sediment toxicity. The sample did not exhibit significant toxicity. The toxicity test included survival and growth of Hyalella azteca. One sample can have multiple toxicity test results but will be counted only once. One sample is defined as being collected on the same day at the same location with the same lab sample id (if provided). |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Region 2 Basin Plan. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Toxicity is defined as a statistically significant effect in the sample exposure compared to the control using EPA-recommended hypothesis testing. . For SWAMP data exceedances are counted with the significant effect code SL. SL is defined as the result being significant compared to the negative control based on a statistical test, less than stated the alpha level, AND less than the evaluation threshold. |
Guideline Reference: |
Methods for Measuring the Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Sediment-associated Contaminants with Freshwater Invertebrates, Second Edition. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Duluth, MI , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DC EPA-600/R-99/064 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The sample was collected at station 205GUA020. |
Temporal Representation: |
The sample was collected in June 2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142010, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275991 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 5 of the 9 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2019-07-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142010, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287683 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Surface Water Monitoring Project data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids. Although a total of 4 samples were collected, 4 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The summed ratios of the pyrethroid pesticides bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, esfenvalerate, lambda-cyhalothrin, permethrin and their respective chronic concentration goals are not to exceed 1. If the freely dissolved concentrations of these pesticides were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Santa Clara 27 (Guadalupe River at Trimble Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2014-07-07 to 2015-12-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
USEPA DPR. 2019. STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020) |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142010, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287647 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Surface Water Monitoring Project data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids. Although a total of 4 samples were collected, 4 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The summed ratios of the pyrethroid pesticides bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, esfenvalerate, lambda-cyhalothrin, permethrin and their respective chronic concentration goals are not to exceed 1. If the freely dissolved concentrations of these pesticides were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Santa Clara 27 (Guadalupe River at Trimble Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2014-07-07 to 2015-12-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
USEPA DPR. 2019. STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020) |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142010, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287764 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Surface Water Monitoring Project data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Pyrethroids. |
Data Reference: |
WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The summed ratios of the pyrethroid pesticides bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, esfenvalerate, lambda-cyhalothrin, permethrin and their respective chronic concentration goals are not to exceed 1. If the freely dissolved concentrations of these pesticides were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Santa Clara 27 (Guadalupe River at Trimble Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-12-10 and 2015-12-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
USEPA DPR. 2019. STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020) |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142010, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287761 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Surface Water Monitoring Project data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Pyrethroids. |
Data Reference: |
WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The summed ratios of the pyrethroid pesticides bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, esfenvalerate, lambda-cyhalothrin, permethrin and their respective chronic concentration goals are not to exceed 1. If the freely dissolved concentrations of these pesticides were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Santa Clara 27 (Guadalupe River at Trimble Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-12-10 and 2015-12-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
USEPA DPR. 2019. STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020). |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
STUDY 299: Pesticide Monitoring in Urban Areas of Northern California (FY 2019/2020) |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142010, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275744 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 5 of the 9 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2019-07-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142007, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275744 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 5 of the 9 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2019-07-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142007, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
91831 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
One sample was collected to evaluate sediment toxicity. The sample did not exhibit significant toxicity. The toxicity test included survival and growth of Hyalella azteca. One sample can have multiple toxicity test results but will be counted only once. One sample is defined as being collected on the same day at the same location with the same lab sample id (if provided). |
Data Reference: |
Statewide Stream Pollution Trends Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Region 2 Basin Plan. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Toxicity is defined as a statistically significant effect in the sample exposure compared to the control using EPA-recommended hypothesis testing. . For SWAMP data exceedances are counted with the significant effect code SL. SL is defined as the result being significant compared to the negative control based on a statistical test, less than stated the alpha level, AND less than the evaluation threshold. |
Guideline Reference: |
Methods for Measuring the Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Sediment-associated Contaminants with Freshwater Invertebrates, Second Edition. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Duluth, MI , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DC EPA-600/R-99/064 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The sample was collected at station 205GUA020. |
Temporal Representation: |
The sample was collected in June 2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142007, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269082 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
10 |
Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
5 of the 10 samples collected by SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends for Guadalupe River exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2011-07-08, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2012-07-05, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2013-06-26, Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2014-06-25, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2019-07-02. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205GUA020 ( Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-07-08 and 2020-07-17. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142007, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269083 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
10 |
Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
5 of the 10 samples collected by SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends for Guadalupe River exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Chironomus dilutus for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2011-07-08, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2012-07-05, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2013-06-26, Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2014-06-25, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv) on 2019-07-02. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205GUA020 ( Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025 ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-07-08 and 2020-07-17. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142007, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270323 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 2 of the 9 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2019-07-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142007, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270221 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 2 of the 9 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2019-07-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142007, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275991 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Stream Pollution Trends data for Guadalupe River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 5 of the 9 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205GUA020 (Guadalupe Creek @ USGS Gaging Station 11169025). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2011-07-08 to 2019-07-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 87599, Trash
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
5479 |
|
Pollutant: |
Trash |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Nuisance |
Matrix: |
Not Specified |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Wildlife Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
8 |
Number of Exceedances: |
8 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Occurrence of conditions judged to cause impairment |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Data available consist of photographic evidence of trash and interpretation of these photos by an experienced trash assessment specialist. Each photograph was analyzed to establish the RTA score for the level of trash and threat to aquatic life parameters, which relate to impairment of REC2 and WILD, respectively. Only those photos clear enough to establish these RTA scores were relied on for the listing determination. These results are available for the following Guadalupe River locations:
Multiple locations on 2/1/2004, 2/18/2005, and 2/2/2006
San Jose Airport on 2/18/2005
Alma Ave. on 2/24/2007
Malone Ave. on 2/24/2007
Between Tasman and Trimble on 2/19/2007
75 yards upstream of I880 on 1/22/2007
At the Montague Expressway on 5/8/2006
This waterbody had threat to aquatic life parameter scores in the poor category (indicating threat to Wildlife Habitat beneficial uses) at more than six different locations on seven different dates. |
Data Reference: |
Report from Roger James and Larry Kolb containing Trash Photos submitted for consideration in 2008 303(d) listing process |
|
Assessment by Matt Cover of Trash Photos (submitted to Region 2 in response to 2008 Data Solicitation)
|
|
Archive of Trash Photos for Guadalupe River submitted for 2008 303(d) list consideration |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Basin Plan prohibits discharge of Rubbish, refuse, bark, sawdust, or other solid wastes into surface waters or at any place where they would contact or where they would be eventually transported to surface waters, including flood plain areas.
The Basin Plan has a narrative objective for floating material, Waters shall not contain floating material, including solids, liquids, foams, and scum, in concentrations that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses.
The Basin Plan has a narrative objective for settleable material, Waters shall not contain substances in concentrations that result in the deposition of material that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
If the RTA Parameter 3 (Threat to Aquatic Life) is in the poor condition category (scores 0-5), then WILD is not supported. This level of trash is a large amount (>50 pieces) of transportable, persistent, buoyant litter that is detrimental to aquatic life. The RTA defines poor condition for this parameter as follows, large amount (>50 pieces) of transportable, persistent, buoyant litter such as: hard or soft plastics, balloons, Styrofoam, cigarette butts; toxic items such as batteries, lighters, or spray cans; large clumps of yard waste or dumped leaf litter; or large amount (>50 pieces) of settleable glass or metal.
Regional Water Board staff trained in the RTA inspected the available photographic evidence and applied the assessment method to determine the Threat to Aquatic Life score. |
Guideline Reference: |
A Rapid Trash Assessment Method Applied to Waters of the San Francisco Bay Region:Trash Measurement in Streams |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Photographic evidence was analyzed using the RTA methodology for this waterbody for more than seven different locations spanning dates from 2004 through 2007. |
Temporal Representation: |
Photographic evidence was collected for this waterbody on seven separate dates from 2004 through 2007. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Assessments of the photographic evidence using the RTA were performed by Regional Water Board staff person who was a co-author of the Rapid Trash Assessment methodology.
Assessments based on photographic evidence were only conducted when sufficient reach-scale and close-up photos were available for a site on a specific date. Photos used for the evaluation needed to be numerous enough and clear enough to document the level of trash at the site in a similar way as the assessor would experience during an actual site visit in the field. For example, at a minimum, one reach-scale photograph (showing at least a 100 linear foot section of the waterbody) and two close-up photographs (of representative trash deposits) were required. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 87599, Trash
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
5480 |
|
Pollutant: |
Trash |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Nuisance |
Matrix: |
Not Specified |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
8 |
Number of Exceedances: |
7 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Occurrence of conditions judged to cause impairment |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Data available consist of photographic evidence of trash and interpretation of these photos by an experienced trash assessment specialist. Each photograph was analyzed to establish the RTA score for the level of trash and threat to aquatic life parameters, which relate to impairment of REC2 and WILD, respectively. Only those photos clear enough to establish these RTA scores were relied on for the listing determination. These results are available for the following Guadalupe River locations:
Multiple locations on 2/1/2004, 2/18/2005, and 2/2/2006
San Jose Airport on 2/18/2005
Alma Ave. on 2/24/2007
Malone Ave. on 2/24/2007
Between Tasman and Trimble on 2/19/2007
75 yards upstream of I880 on 1/22/2007
At the Montague Expressway on 5/8/2006
This waterbody had level of trash parameter scores in the poor category (indicating impairment of non-contact water recreational beneficial uses) at five locations on six different dates. |
Data Reference: |
Report from Roger James and Larry Kolb containing Trash Photos submitted for consideration in 2008 303(d) listing process |
|
Assessment by Matt Cover of Trash Photos (submitted to Region 2 in response to 2008 Data Solicitation)
|
|
Archive of Trash Photos for Guadalupe River submitted for 2008 303(d) list consideration |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Basin Plan prohibits discharge of Rubbish, refuse, bark, sawdust, or other solid wastes into surface waters or at any place where they would contact or where they would be eventually transported to surface waters, including flood plain areas.
The Basin Plan has a narrative objective for floating material, Waters shall not contain floating material, including solids, liquids, foams, and scum, in concentrations that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses.
The Basin Plan has a narrative objective for settleable material, Waters shall not contain substances in concentrations that result in the deposition of material that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
If the Rapid Trash Assessment (RTA) Parameter 1 (Level of Trash) is in the poor condition category (scores 0-5), REC2 is not supported. This level of trash distracts the eye on first glance, making the site unsuitable for recreation. The RTA defines poor condition for this parameter as follows, trash distracts the eye on first glance. Stream, bank surfaces, and immediate riparian zone contain substantial levels of litter and debris (>100 pieces). Evidence of site being used frequently by people: many cans, bottles, and food wrappers, blankets, clothing.
Regional Water Board staff trained in the RTA inspected the available photographic evidence and applied the assessment method to determine the Level of Trash score. |
Guideline Reference: |
A Rapid Trash Assessment Method Applied to Waters of the San Francisco Bay Region:Trash Measurement in Streams |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Photographic evidence was analyzed using the RTA methodology for this waterbody for more than seven different locations spanning dates from 2004 through 2007. |
Temporal Representation: |
Photographic evidence was collected for this waterbody on seven separate dates from 2004 through 2007. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Assessments of the photographic evidence using the RTA were performed by Regional Water Board staff person who was a co-author of the Rapid Trash Assessment methodology.
Assessments based on photographic evidence were only conducted when sufficient reach-scale and close-up photos were available for a site on a specific date. Photos used for the evaluation needed to be numerous enough and clear enough to document the level of trash at the site in a similar way as the assessor would experience during an actual site visit in the field. For example, at a minimum, one reach-scale photograph (showing at least a 100 linear foot section of the waterbody) and two close-up photographs (of representative trash deposits) were required. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 87599, Trash
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
5478 |
|
Pollutant: |
Trash |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Nuisance |
Matrix: |
Not Specified |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
8 |
Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Occurrence of conditions judged to cause impairment |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Data results were obtained through application of the Urban Rapid Trash Assessment (URTA) methodology, developed by the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program. The URTA is a modification of the Rapid Trash Assessment (RTA) developed by the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP). The URTA method documents the total number and characteristics of pieces of trash per one hundred feet of stream or shoreline. The trash assessment protocol involves picking up and tallying all of the trash items found within the defined boundaries of a site. The tally results for level of trash (relating to REC2) and transportable, persistent, buoyant litter (relating to WILD) assessment parameters were considered for the listing determination. These results are available for field visits/trash surveys conducted in September 2004, an unknown date in 2005, and November 2006 according to the Urban Rapid Trash Assessment (URTA) methodology.
This waterbody had level of trash parameter scores in the poor category (indicating impairment of non-contact water recreational beneficial uses) at three locations and on three different dates. |
Data Reference: |
Memo: Development of Urban Rapid Trash Assessment Protocol. March 13, 2006 |
|
Spreadsheet of Urban Rapid Trash Assessment (URTA) data collected by the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program, 2004-2007 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Basin Plan prohibits discharge of Rubbish, refuse, bark, sawdust, or other solid wastes into surface waters or at any place where they would contact or where they would be eventually transported to surface waters, including flood plain areas.
The Basin Plan has a narrative objective for floating material, Waters shall not contain floating material, including solids, liquids, foams, and scum, in concentrations that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses.
The Basin Plan has a narrative objective for settleable material, Waters shall not contain substances in concentrations that result in the deposition of material that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
If the Urban Rapid Trash Assessment (URTA) Parameter 1 (Level of Trash) is in the poor condition category (scores 0-5), REC2 is not supported. The URTA defines poor condition for this parameter as a level of trash that distracts the eye on first glance. Stream, bank surfaces, and immediate riparian zone contain substantial levels of litter and debris. Evidence of site being used frequently by people: many cans, bottles, and food wrappers, blankets, clothing. |
Guideline Reference: |
Memo: Development of Urban Rapid Trash Assessment Protocol. March 13, 2006 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
URTA data were collected for this waterbody in five locations in 2004 through 2006. |
Temporal Representation: |
URTA data was collected for this waterbody on five separate dates from September 2004 through November 2006. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected by trained staff in accordance with URTA methodology developed by SCVURPPP and are deemed reliable and of sufficient quality on which to base listing determinations. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 87599, Trash
|
Region 2 |
Guadalupe River |
|
|
LOE ID: |
5477 |
|
Pollutant: |
Trash |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Nuisance |
Matrix: |
Not Specified |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Wildlife Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
8 |
Number of Exceedances: |
7 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Occurrence of conditions judged to cause impairment |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Data results were obtained through application of the Urban Rapid Trash Assessment (URTA) methodology, developed by the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program. The URTA is a modification of the Rapid Trash Assessment (RTA) developed by the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP). The URTA method documents the total number and characteristics of pieces of trash per one hundred feet of stream or shoreline. The trash assessment protocol involves picking up and tallying all of the trash items found within the defined boundaries of a site. The tally results for level of trash (relating to REC2) and transportable, persistent, buoyant litter (relating to WILD) assessment parameters were considered for the listing determination. These results are available for field visits/trash surveys conducted in September 2004, an unknown date in 2005, and November 2006 according to the Urban Rapid Trash Assessment (URTA) methodology. This waterbody had transportable, Persistent, Buoyant Litter parameter scores in the marginal urban and poor category (indicating threat to Wildlife Habitat beneficial uses) at four locations and on four different dates. |
Data Reference: |
Memo: Development of Urban Rapid Trash Assessment Protocol. March 13, 2006 |
|
Spreadsheet of Urban Rapid Trash Assessment (URTA) data collected by the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program, 2004-2007 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Basin Plan prohibits discharge of Rubbish, refuse, bark, sawdust, or other solid wastes into surface waters or at any place where they would contact or where they would be eventually transported to surface waters, including flood plain areas.
The Basin Plan has a narrative objective for floating material, Waters shall not contain floating material, including solids, liquids, foams, and scum, in concentrations that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses.
The Basin Plan has a narrative objective for settleable material, Waters shall not contain substances in concentrations that result in the deposition of material that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
If the URTA Parameter 3 (Transportable, Persistent, Buoyant Litter) is in the marginal urban or poor condition category (scores 0-10), then WILD is not supported. The URTA defines marginal urban or poor condition for this parameter as follows. this level of trash is a medium prevalence (76-200 pieces) or large amount (>200 pieces) of transportable, persistent, buoyant litter such as: hard or soft plastics, styrofoam, balloons, cigarette butts. These types of items are all detrimental to aquatic life. |
Guideline Reference: |
Memo: Development of Urban Rapid Trash Assessment Protocol. March 13, 2006 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
URTA data were collected for this waterbody in five locations in 2004 through 2006. |
Temporal Representation: |
URTA data were collected for this waterbody on five separate dates from September 2004 through November 2006. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected by trained staff in accordance with URTA methodology developed by SCVURPPP and are deemed reliable and of sufficient quality on which to base listing determinations. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|