Pollutant: |
Ammonia |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150599, Ammonia
|
Region 8 |
Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
235179 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB8 Monitoring data for Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 8. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The concentrations of contaminants in waters which are existing or potential sources of drinking water shall not occur at levels that are harmful to human health (Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA Health Advisory for lifetime exposure to ammonia as a drinking water level is a concentration of 30 mg/L. This Advisory Level is defined as 'the concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse noncarcinogenic effects for up to ten days of exposure. |
Guideline Reference: |
2018 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 801PLC469 (Plunge Creek Random Olsen Site 469). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-26 and 2012-06-26 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150599, Ammonia
|
Region 8 |
Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
235169 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB8 So. CA Stormwater Monitoring Coalition data for Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 8. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The concentrations of contaminants in waters which are existing or potential sources of drinking water shall not occur at levels that are harmful to human health (Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA Health Advisory for lifetime exposure to ammonia as a drinking water level is a concentration of 30 mg/L. This Advisory Level is defined as 'the concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse noncarcinogenic effects for up to ten days of exposure. |
Guideline Reference: |
2018 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 801S04471 (Plunge Creek Random SMC Site 04471). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-07-09 and 2012-07-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 133822, Arsenic
|
Region 8 |
Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
235449 |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB8 So. CA Stormwater Monitoring Coalition data for Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Arsenic. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 8. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The concentrations of contaminants in waters which are existing or potential sources of drinking water shall not occur at levels that are harmful to human health (Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for arsenic is 10 ug/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22). |
Guideline Reference: |
California MCLs - Title 17 and Title 22 documents for 2019 - California Regulations Related to Drinking Water |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 801S04471 (Plunge Creek Random SMC Site 04471). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-07-09 and 2012-07-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 133822, Arsenic
|
Region 8 |
Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
235465 |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB8 So. CA Stormwater Monitoring Coalition data for Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Arsenic. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 8. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The concentrations of contaminants in waters which are existing or potential sources of drinking water shall not occur at levels that are harmful to human health (Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for arsenic is 10 ug/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22). |
Guideline Reference: |
California MCLs - Title 17 and Title 22 documents for 2019 - California Regulations Related to Drinking Water |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 801S04471 (Plunge Creek Random SMC Site 04471). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-07-09 and 2012-07-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 133823, Cadmium
|
Region 8 |
Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
235517 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB8 So. CA Stormwater Monitoring Coalition data for Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cadmium. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 8. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The concentrations of contaminants in waters which are existing or potential sources of drinking water shall not occur at levels that are harmful to human health (Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for cadmium is 0.005 mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22). |
Guideline Reference: |
California MCLs - Title 17 and Title 22 documents for 2019 - California Regulations Related to Drinking Water |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 801S04471 (Plunge Creek Random SMC Site 04471). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-07-09 and 2012-07-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 133823, Cadmium
|
Region 8 |
Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
235792 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB8 So. CA Stormwater Monitoring Coalition data for Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cadmium. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 8. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The concentrations of contaminants in waters which are existing or potential sources of drinking water shall not occur at levels that are harmful to human health (Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for cadmium is 0.005 mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22). |
Guideline Reference: |
California MCLs - Title 17 and Title 22 documents for 2019 - California Regulations Related to Drinking Water |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 801S04471 (Plunge Creek Random SMC Site 04471). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-07-09 and 2012-07-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Pollutant: |
Chromium |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 133829, Chromium
|
Region 8 |
Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
236147 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chromium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB8 So. CA Stormwater Monitoring Coalition data for Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chromium. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 8. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The concentrations of contaminants in waters which are existing or potential sources of drinking water shall not occur at levels that are harmful to human health (Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for total chromium is 0.05 mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22). |
Guideline Reference: |
California MCLs - Title 17 and Title 22 documents for 2019 - California Regulations Related to Drinking Water |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 801S04471 (Plunge Creek Random SMC Site 04471). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-07-09 and 2012-07-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 133829, Chromium
|
Region 8 |
Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
235936 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chromium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB8 So. CA Stormwater Monitoring Coalition data for Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chromium. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 8. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The concentrations of contaminants in waters which are existing or potential sources of drinking water shall not occur at levels that are harmful to human health (Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for total chromium is 0.05 mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22). |
Guideline Reference: |
California MCLs - Title 17 and Title 22 documents for 2019 - California Regulations Related to Drinking Water |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 801S04471 (Plunge Creek Random SMC Site 04471). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-07-09 and 2012-07-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 133825, Copper
|
Region 8 |
Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
235933 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB8 So. CA Stormwater Monitoring Coalition data for Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Copper. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 8. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The copper criterion for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 1,300 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 801S04471 (Plunge Creek Random SMC Site 04471). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-07-09 and 2012-07-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 133825, Copper
|
Region 8 |
Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
236053 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB8 So. CA Stormwater Monitoring Coalition data for Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Copper. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 8. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The copper criterion for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 1,300 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 801S04471 (Plunge Creek Random SMC Site 04471). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-07-09 and 2012-07-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Pollutant: |
Lead |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 133826, Lead
|
Region 8 |
Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
236608 |
|
Pollutant: |
Lead |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB8 So. CA Stormwater Monitoring Coalition data for Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 8. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The concentrations of contaminants in waters which are existing or potential sources of drinking water shall not occur at levels that are harmful to human health (Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for lead is 15 ug/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22). |
Guideline Reference: |
California MCLs - Title 17 and Title 22 documents for 2019 - California Regulations Related to Drinking Water |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 801S04471 (Plunge Creek Random SMC Site 04471). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-07-09 and 2012-07-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 133826, Lead
|
Region 8 |
Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
236524 |
|
Pollutant: |
Lead |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB8 So. CA Stormwater Monitoring Coalition data for Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 8. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The concentrations of contaminants in waters which are existing or potential sources of drinking water shall not occur at levels that are harmful to human health (Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for lead is 15 ug/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22). |
Guideline Reference: |
California MCLs - Title 17 and Title 22 documents for 2019 - California Regulations Related to Drinking Water |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 801S04471 (Plunge Creek Random SMC Site 04471). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-07-09 and 2012-07-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 133827, Nickel
|
Region 8 |
Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
236660 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB8 So. CA Stormwater Monitoring Coalition data for Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 8. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The concentrations of contaminants in waters which are existing or potential sources of drinking water shall not occur at levels that are harmful to human health (Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The maximum contaminant level of nickel in public water systems shall be 0.1 mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15, Sections 64431). |
Guideline Reference: |
California MCLs - Title 17 and Title 22 documents for 2019 - California Regulations Related to Drinking Water |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 801S04471 (Plunge Creek Random SMC Site 04471). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-07-09 and 2012-07-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 133827, Nickel
|
Region 8 |
Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
236598 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB8 So. CA Stormwater Monitoring Coalition data for Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 8. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The concentrations of contaminants in waters which are existing or potential sources of drinking water shall not occur at levels that are harmful to human health (Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The maximum contaminant level of nickel in public water systems shall be 0.1 mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15, Sections 64431). |
Guideline Reference: |
California MCLs - Title 17 and Title 22 documents for 2019 - California Regulations Related to Drinking Water |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 801S04471 (Plunge Creek Random SMC Site 04471). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-07-09 and 2012-07-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrite |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Pollutant: |
Selenium |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 133828, Selenium
|
Region 8 |
Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
237773 |
|
Pollutant: |
Selenium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB8 So. CA Stormwater Monitoring Coalition data for Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Selenium. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 8. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The concentrations of contaminants in waters which are existing or potential sources of drinking water shall not occur at levels that are harmful to human health (Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for selenium is 0.05 mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22). |
Guideline Reference: |
California MCLs - Title 17 and Title 22 documents for 2019 - California Regulations Related to Drinking Water |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 801S04471 (Plunge Creek Random SMC Site 04471). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-07-09 and 2012-07-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 133828, Selenium
|
Region 8 |
Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
237550 |
|
Pollutant: |
Selenium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB8 So. CA Stormwater Monitoring Coalition data for Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Selenium. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 8. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The concentrations of contaminants in waters which are existing or potential sources of drinking water shall not occur at levels that are harmful to human health (Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for selenium is 0.05 mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22). |
Guideline Reference: |
California MCLs - Title 17 and Title 22 documents for 2019 - California Regulations Related to Drinking Water |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 801S04471 (Plunge Creek Random SMC Site 04471). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-07-09 and 2012-07-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic Community Effects |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status |
Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Benthic Community Effects is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 3.9 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.9, an additional line of evidence associating the Benthic Community Effects with a water or sediment concentration of pollutants is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record. The CSCI score for this site was 1.352328.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing Benthic Community Effects in this water segment on the CWA section 303(d) List.
This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. The CSCI score for this site was 1.352328. Additionally, this water body passed several screening criteria and was identified as a reference water body for the purposes of developing the CSCI. The State Water Board has redefined the Integrated Reporting categories in order to make them more reflective of actual water quality conditions in the State. This revision allows for the inclusion of minimally disturbed data reference sites that were identified in the development of the California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) tool into Category 1. Reference sites are the core of the State¿s statewide biological and habitat assessment program and set the benchmark for biological conditions expected when human activity in the landscape is absent or minimal. Unless there is any additional data showing that beneficial uses in a water body are not being supported, these reference water bodies along with any other bioassessment data sets showing a score of 0.92 or higher will be placed in Category 1 (all core beneficial uses are supported).
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 79692, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 8 |
Plunge Creek (Valley Reach) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
96041 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
The CSCI score for these sites is 1.352328 and is therefore meeting the water quality objective for this water body. This water body passed several screening criteria and was identified as a reference water body for the purposes of developing the CSCI. Reference sites where human disturbance is absent or minimal are used to set benchmark expectations for healthy streams. A large set of nearly 600 reference sites representing the broad diversity of natural stream types found across California was used to develop the CSCI. |
Data Reference: |
Complete data set for all CSCI reference sites for the entire State. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Inland surface water communities and populations, including vertebrate, invertebrate, and plant species, shall not be degraded as a result of the discharge of waste. Degradation is damage to an aquatic community or population with the result that balanced community no longer exists. The concentrations of toxic pollutants in the water column, sediments or biota shall not adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rhen, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Sampling was done at to following station: 801WE0806 |
Temporal Representation: |
Sampling was done: 6/20/2001 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data collected following SWAMP QA protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|