Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147850, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
292999 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall not contain chemical constituents in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXD (Judd Creek 0.6mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-04 and 2016-10-04 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147850, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
292878 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall not contain chemical constituents in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXC (Judd Creek 0.7mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-05 and 2016-10-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147850, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
292919 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall not contain chemical constituents in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXE (Judd Creek 1.5mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-10 and 2016-10-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147850, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
292977 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall not contain chemical constituents in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPIJD4 (Judd Creek 4 ~1mi above Carter Cr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-09-02 and 2016-10-04 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147850, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
292895 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall not contain chemical constituents in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXB (Judd Creek 0.8mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-05 and 2016-10-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147850, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
292918 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall not contain chemical constituents in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPIJD3 (Judd Creek 3 ~2.5mi above Carter Cr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-09-02 and 2015-09-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147850, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
293267 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall not contain chemical constituents in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXA (Judd Creek 0.9mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-06 and 2016-10-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151537, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
305737 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 509SPJDXC to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 1.111738494 to 1.111738494. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 5, Sacramento River sub-region. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Region 5 Basin Plan |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 509SPJDXC. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 10/5/2016 to 10/5/2016. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected using Sierra Pacific Industries Research protocols |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151537, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
305739 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 509SPJDXE to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 1.05256031 to 1.05256031. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 5, Sacramento River sub-region. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Region 5 Basin Plan |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 509SPJDXE. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 10/10/2016 to 10/10/2016. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected using Sierra Pacific Industries Research protocols |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151537, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
305738 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 509SPJDXD to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.847372039 to 0.847372039. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 5, Sacramento River sub-region. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Region 5 Basin Plan |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 509SPJDXD. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 10/4/2016 to 10/4/2016. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected using Sierra Pacific Industries Research protocols |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151537, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
305724 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 509SPJDXB to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 1.091103987 to 1.091103987. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 5, Sacramento River sub-region. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Region 5 Basin Plan |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 509SPJDXB. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 10/5/2016 to 10/5/2016. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected using Sierra Pacific Industries Research protocols |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151537, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
305723 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 509SPIJD4 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.990757323 to 0.997779006. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 5, Sacramento River sub-region. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Region 5 Basin Plan |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 509SPIJD4. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 9/2/2015 to 10/4/2016. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected using Sierra Pacific Industries Research protocols |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151537, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
305722 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 509SPIJD3 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 1.107854425 to 1.107854425. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 5, Sacramento River sub-region. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Region 5 Basin Plan |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 509SPIJD3. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 9/2/2015 to 9/2/2015. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected using Sierra Pacific Industries Research protocols |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 153667, Chloride
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
311538 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the upper limit of the range for Chloride. Additionally, 0 of the 1 samples fall within the range, and 1 of 1 samples fall below the threshold. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins specifies a range for chloride of 250 - 500 mg/L assessed as an annual average. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXB (Judd Creek 0.8mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-05 and 2016-10-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 153667, Chloride
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
311553 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the upper limit of the range for Chloride. Additionally, 0 of the 1 samples fall within the range, and 1 of 1 samples fall below the threshold. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins specifies a range for chloride of 250 - 500 mg/L assessed as an annual average. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXC (Judd Creek 0.7mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-05 and 2016-10-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 153667, Chloride
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
311535 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the upper limit of the range for Chloride. Additionally, 0 of the 1 samples fall within the range, and 1 of 1 samples fall below the threshold. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins specifies a range for chloride of 250 - 500 mg/L assessed as an annual average. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXD (Judd Creek 0.6mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-04 and 2016-10-04 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 153667, Chloride
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
311504 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the upper limit of the range for Chloride. Additionally, 0 of the 1 samples fall within the range, and 1 of 1 samples fall below the threshold. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins specifies a range for chloride of 250 - 500 mg/L assessed as an annual average. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPIJD3 (Judd Creek 3 ~2.5mi above Carter Cr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-09-02 and 2015-09-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 153667, Chloride
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
311536 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the upper limit of the range for Chloride. Additionally, 0 of the 1 samples fall within the range, and 1 of 1 samples fall below the threshold. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins specifies a range for chloride of 250 - 500 mg/L assessed as an annual average. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXA (Judd Creek 0.9mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-06 and 2016-10-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 153667, Chloride
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
311530 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the upper limit of the range for Chloride. Additionally, 0 of the 2 samples fall within the range, and 2 of 2 samples fall below the threshold. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins specifies a range for chloride of 250 - 500 mg/L assessed as an annual average. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPIJD4 (Judd Creek 4 ~1mi above Carter Cr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-09-02 and 2016-10-04 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 153667, Chloride
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
311571 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the upper limit of the range for Chloride. Additionally, 0 of the 1 samples fall within the range, and 1 of 1 samples fall below the threshold. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins specifies a range for chloride of 250 - 500 mg/L assessed as an annual average. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXE (Judd Creek 1.5mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-10 and 2016-10-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147846, Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
295467 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate + Nitrite as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate + nitrite (as N) incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 10 mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPIJD4 (Judd Creek 4 ~1mi above Carter Cr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-09-02 and 2016-10-04 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147846, Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
295491 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate + Nitrite as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate + nitrite (as N) incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 10 mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXD (Judd Creek 0.6mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-04 and 2016-10-04 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147846, Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
295394 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate + Nitrite as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate + nitrite (as N) incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 10 mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPIJD3 (Judd Creek 3 ~2.5mi above Carter Cr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-09-02 and 2015-09-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147846, Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
295395 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate + Nitrite as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate + nitrite (as N) incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 10 mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXB (Judd Creek 0.8mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-05 and 2016-10-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147846, Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
295397 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate + Nitrite as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate + nitrite (as N) incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 10 mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXC (Judd Creek 0.7mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-05 and 2016-10-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147846, Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
295443 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate + Nitrite as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate + nitrite (as N) incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 10 mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXA (Judd Creek 0.9mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-06 and 2016-10-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147846, Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
295422 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate + Nitrite as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate + nitrite (as N) incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins is 10 mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXE (Judd Creek 1.5mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-10 and 2016-10-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148425, Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia)
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
293254 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXE (Judd Creek 1.5mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-10 and 2016-10-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148425, Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia)
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
293213 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXA (Judd Creek 0.9mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-06 and 2016-10-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148425, Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia)
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
293215 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXD (Judd Creek 0.6mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-04 and 2016-10-04 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148425, Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia)
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
293214 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPIJD4 (Judd Creek 4 ~1mi above Carter Cr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-09-02 and 2016-10-04 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148425, Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia)
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
293168 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXC (Judd Creek 0.7mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-05 and 2016-10-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148425, Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia)
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
293167 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXB (Judd Creek 0.8mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-05 and 2016-10-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148425, Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia)
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
293126 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPIJD3 (Judd Creek 3 ~2.5mi above Carter Cr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-09-02 and 2015-09-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147847, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
295688 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXD (Judd Creek 0.6mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-04 and 2016-10-04 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147847, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
295983 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPIJD3 (Judd Creek 3 ~2.5mi above Carter Cr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-09-02 and 2015-09-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147847, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
295735 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as SPWN is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXB (Judd Creek 0.8mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-05 and 2016-10-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147847, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
295506 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXE (Judd Creek 1.5mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-10 and 2016-10-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147847, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
295677 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as SPWN is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXC (Judd Creek 0.7mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-05 and 2016-10-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147847, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
295733 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXC (Judd Creek 0.7mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-05 and 2016-10-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147847, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
295676 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPIJD4 (Judd Creek 4 ~1mi above Carter Cr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-09-02 and 2016-10-04 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147847, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
295432 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as SPWN is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXE (Judd Creek 1.5mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-10 and 2016-10-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147847, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
295535 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as SPWN is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPIJD3 (Judd Creek 3 ~2.5mi above Carter Cr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-09-02 and 2015-09-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147847, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
295344 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXA (Judd Creek 0.9mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-06 and 2016-10-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147847, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
295701 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as SPWN is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXD (Judd Creek 0.6mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-04 and 2016-10-04 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147847, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
295827 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXB (Judd Creek 0.8mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-05 and 2016-10-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147847, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
295699 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as SPWN is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXA (Judd Creek 0.9mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-06 and 2016-10-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147847, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
295984 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as SPWN is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPIJD4 (Judd Creek 4 ~1mi above Carter Cr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-09-02 and 2016-10-04 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154049, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
311592 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the upper limit of the range for SpecificConductivity. Additionally, 0 of the 1 samples fall within the range, and 1 of 1 samples fall below the threshold. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins specifies a range for specific conductance of 900 - 1600 uS/cm assessed as an annual average. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXA (Judd Creek 0.9mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-06 and 2016-10-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154049, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
311730 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the upper limit of the range for SpecificConductivity. Additionally, 0 of the 1 samples fall within the range, and 1 of 1 samples fall below the threshold. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins specifies a range for specific conductance of 900 - 1600 uS/cm assessed as an annual average. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXD (Judd Creek 0.6mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-04 and 2016-10-04 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154049, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
311820 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the upper limit of the range for SpecificConductivity. Additionally, 0 of the 1 samples fall within the range, and 1 of 1 samples fall below the threshold. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins specifies a range for specific conductance of 900 - 1600 uS/cm assessed as an annual average. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXC (Judd Creek 0.7mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-05 and 2016-10-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154049, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
311816 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the upper limit of the range for SpecificConductivity. Additionally, 0 of the 1 samples fall within the range, and 1 of 1 samples fall below the threshold. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins specifies a range for specific conductance of 900 - 1600 uS/cm assessed as an annual average. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXB (Judd Creek 0.8mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-05 and 2016-10-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154049, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
311763 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the upper limit of the range for SpecificConductivity. Additionally, 0 of the 2 samples fall within the range, and 2 of 2 samples fall below the threshold. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins specifies a range for specific conductance of 900 - 1600 uS/cm assessed as an annual average. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPIJD4 (Judd Creek 4 ~1mi above Carter Cr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-09-02 and 2016-10-04 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154049, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
311598 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the upper limit of the range for SpecificConductivity. Additionally, 0 of the 1 samples fall within the range, and 1 of 1 samples fall below the threshold. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins specifies a range for specific conductance of 900 - 1600 uS/cm assessed as an annual average. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXE (Judd Creek 1.5mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-10 and 2016-10-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154049, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
311788 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the upper limit of the range for SpecificConductivity. Additionally, 0 of the 1 samples fall within the range, and 1 of 1 samples fall below the threshold. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins specifies a range for specific conductance of 900 - 1600 uS/cm assessed as an annual average. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPIJD3 (Judd Creek 3 ~2.5mi above Carter Cr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-09-02 and 2015-09-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 153668, Sulfates
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
311957 |
|
Pollutant: |
Sulfates |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the upper limit of the range for Sulfate. Additionally, 0 of the 1 samples fall within the range, and 1 of 1 samples fall below the threshold. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins specifies a range for sulfate of 250 - 500 mg/L assessed as an annual average. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXB (Judd Creek 0.8mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-05 and 2016-10-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 153668, Sulfates
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
311933 |
|
Pollutant: |
Sulfates |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the upper limit of the range for Sulfate. Additionally, 0 of the 1 samples fall within the range, and 1 of 1 samples fall below the threshold. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins specifies a range for sulfate of 250 - 500 mg/L assessed as an annual average. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXD (Judd Creek 0.6mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-04 and 2016-10-04 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 153668, Sulfates
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
311907 |
|
Pollutant: |
Sulfates |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the upper limit of the range for Sulfate. Additionally, 0 of the 1 samples fall within the range, and 1 of 1 samples fall below the threshold. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins specifies a range for sulfate of 250 - 500 mg/L assessed as an annual average. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXE (Judd Creek 1.5mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-10 and 2016-10-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 153668, Sulfates
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
311863 |
|
Pollutant: |
Sulfates |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the upper limit of the range for Sulfate. Additionally, 0 of the 1 samples fall within the range, and 1 of 1 samples fall below the threshold. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins specifies a range for sulfate of 250 - 500 mg/L assessed as an annual average. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXC (Judd Creek 0.7mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-05 and 2016-10-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 153668, Sulfates
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
312073 |
|
Pollutant: |
Sulfates |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the upper limit of the range for Sulfate. Additionally, 0 of the 1 samples fall within the range, and 1 of 1 samples fall below the threshold. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins specifies a range for sulfate of 250 - 500 mg/L assessed as an annual average. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXA (Judd Creek 0.9mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-06 and 2016-10-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 153668, Sulfates
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
312053 |
|
Pollutant: |
Sulfates |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the upper limit of the range for Sulfate. Additionally, 0 of the 2 samples fall within the range, and 2 of 2 samples fall below the threshold. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins specifies a range for sulfate of 250 - 500 mg/L assessed as an annual average. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPIJD4 (Judd Creek 4 ~1mi above Carter Cr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-09-02 and 2016-10-04 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 153668, Sulfates
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
311956 |
|
Pollutant: |
Sulfates |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the upper limit of the range for Sulfate. Additionally, 0 of the 1 samples fall within the range, and 1 of 1 samples fall below the threshold. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins specifies a range for sulfate of 250 - 500 mg/L assessed as an annual average. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPIJD3 (Judd Creek 3 ~2.5mi above Carter Cr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-09-02 and 2015-09-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147849, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
296764 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXE (Judd Creek 1.5mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-10 and 2016-10-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147849, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
296663 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXB (Judd Creek 0.8mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-05 and 2016-10-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147849, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
296599 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPIJD4 (Judd Creek 4 ~1mi above Carter Cr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-09-02 and 2016-10-04 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147849, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
296486 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXC (Judd Creek 0.7mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-05 and 2016-10-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147849, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
296504 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXA (Judd Creek 0.9mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-06 and 2016-10-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147849, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
296564 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPIJD3 (Judd Creek 3 ~2.5mi above Carter Cr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-09-02 and 2015-09-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147849, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
296606 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXD (Judd Creek 0.6mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-04 and 2016-10-04 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147848, pH
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
296095 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPIJD4 (Judd Creek 4 ~1mi above Carter Cr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-09-02 and 2016-10-04 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147848, pH
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
296269 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXB (Judd Creek 0.8mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-05 and 2016-10-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147848, pH
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
296377 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPIJD3 (Judd Creek 3 ~2.5mi above Carter Cr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-09-02 and 2015-09-02 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147848, pH
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
296188 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXE (Judd Creek 1.5mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-10 and 2016-10-10 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147848, pH
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
296108 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXC (Judd Creek 0.7mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-05 and 2016-10-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147848, pH
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
296061 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXA (Judd Creek 0.9mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-06 and 2016-10-06 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 147848, pH
|
Region 5 |
Judd Creek (Tehama County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
296421 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Sierra Pacific Industries Research data for Judd Creek (Tehama County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 5. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 509SPJDXD (Judd Creek 0.6mi above Ponderosa Way). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-10-04 and 2016-10-04 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Sierra Pacific Industries. 2020. Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Research and Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Manual |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sierra Pacific Industries Research and Monitoring Program QAPP |
|