Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150880, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
280197 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-06 and 2012-06-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150880, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
278512 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-28 and 2015-04-28 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150880, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
278884 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-06 and 2012-06-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150880, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
278561 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-28 and 2015-04-28 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150880, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
278653 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-06 and 2012-06-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150880, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
280043 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-28 and 2015-04-28 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150880, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
280042 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-06 and 2012-06-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150880, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
279628 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-28 and 2015-04-28 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143726, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
280429 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for bifenthrin is 0.1 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of bifenthrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Bifenthrin |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-01-09 to 2018-01-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143726, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268655 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv). |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204R01951 ( Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd. ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-07-07 and 2015-07-07. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143726, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268778 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204CVY010 ( Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-11 and 2016-07-11. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143726, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268664 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv). |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204R01951 ( Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd. ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-07-07 and 2015-07-07. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143726, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
270277 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2012-07-25 to 2012-07-25 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143726, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
270319 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2012-07-25 to 2012-07-25 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143726, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
280602 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for bifenthrin is 0.1 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of bifenthrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Bifenthrin |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-01-09 to 2018-01-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143726, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
270399 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143726, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
270144 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143726, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
270238 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143726, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268617 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Hyalella azteca for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2012-07-25. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204R00047 ( Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047 ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-07-25 and 2012-07-25. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143726, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268618 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Hyalella azteca for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2012-07-25. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204R00047 ( Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047 ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-07-25 and 2012-07-25. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143726, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
270421 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143726, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268786 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204CVY010 ( Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-11 and 2016-07-11. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143729, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
271802 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin, total . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cyfluthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.1 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.1 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cyfluthrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143729, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
271801 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin, total . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cyfluthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.1 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.1 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cyfluthrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2012-07-25 to 2012-07-25 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143729, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
271904 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin, total . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cyfluthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.1 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.1 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cyfluthrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2012-07-25 to 2012-07-25 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143729, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283356 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cyfluthrin. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for cyfluthrin is 0.2 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of cyfluthrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Cyfluthrin |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-09 and 2018-01-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143729, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283251 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cyfluthrin. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for cyfluthrin is 0.2 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of cyfluthrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Cyfluthrin |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-09 and 2018-01-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143729, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
271902 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin, total . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cyfluthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.1 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.1 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cyfluthrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143729, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
271781 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin, total . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cyfluthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.1 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.1 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cyfluthrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143729, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
271867 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin, total . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cyfluthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.1 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.1 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cyfluthrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143731, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
271811 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyhalothrin, Total lambda- . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lambda-cyhalothrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.44 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.44 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for lambda-cyhalothrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2012-07-25 to 2012-07-25 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143731, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
271719 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyhalothrin, Total lambda- . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lambda-cyhalothrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.44 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.44 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for lambda-cyhalothrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143731, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
284344 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lambda-cyhalothrin. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for lambda-cyhalothrin is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of lambda-cyhalothrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Lambda-cyhalothrin |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-09 and 2018-01-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143731, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
271952 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyhalothrin, Total lambda- . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lambda-cyhalothrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.44 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.44 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for lambda-cyhalothrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143731, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
271813 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyhalothrin, Total lambda- . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lambda-cyhalothrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.44 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.44 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for lambda-cyhalothrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2012-07-25 to 2012-07-25 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143731, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
271890 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyhalothrin, Total lambda- . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lambda-cyhalothrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.44 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.44 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for lambda-cyhalothrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143731, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
271837 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyhalothrin, Total lambda- . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lambda-cyhalothrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.44 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.44 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for lambda-cyhalothrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143731, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
284383 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lambda-cyhalothrin. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for lambda-cyhalothrin is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of lambda-cyhalothrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Lambda-cyhalothrin |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-09 and 2018-01-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143727, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
272206 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin, Total . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cypermethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.3 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.3 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cypermethrin from Maund et al., (2002). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143727, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
271723 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin, Total . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cypermethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.3 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.3 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cypermethrin from Maund et al., (2002). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2012-07-25 to 2012-07-25 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143727, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283139 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cypermethrin. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for cypermethrin is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of cypermethrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Cypermethrin |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-09 and 2018-01-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143727, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283608 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cypermethrin. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for cypermethrin is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of cypermethrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Cypermethrin |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-09 and 2018-01-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143727, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
272229 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin, Total . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cypermethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.3 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.3 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cypermethrin from Maund et al., (2002). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143727, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
272225 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin, Total . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cypermethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.3 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.3 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cypermethrin from Maund et al., (2002). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143727, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
272210 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin, Total . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cypermethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.3 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.3 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cypermethrin from Maund et al., (2002). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2012-07-25 to 2012-07-25 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143727, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
272246 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin, Total . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cypermethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.3 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.3 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cypermethrin from Maund et al., (2002). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148250, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
276323 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD) . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for total DDTs is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 572 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2012-07-25 to 2012-07-25 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148250, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
276465 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD) . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for total DDTs is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 572 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148250, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
276115 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD) . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for total DDTs is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 572 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2012-07-25 to 2012-07-25 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148250, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
276261 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD) . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for total DDTs is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 572 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148250, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
272487 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the sum of DDT is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 62.9 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2012-07-25 to 2012-07-25 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148250, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
272528 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the sum of DDT is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 62.9 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148250, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
272385 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the sum of DDT is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 62.9 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2012-07-25 to 2012-07-25 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148250, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
272390 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the sum of DDT is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 62.9 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143730, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
272439 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.79 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.79 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for deltamethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143730, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
272471 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.79 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.79 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for deltamethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143730, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
272477 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.79 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.79 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for deltamethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143730, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283506 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.000026 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic). |
| Guideline Reference: |
OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-01-09 to 2018-01-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143730, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
272499 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.79 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.79 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for deltamethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2012-07-25 to 2012-07-25 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143730, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283738 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.000026 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic). |
| Guideline Reference: |
OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-01-09 to 2018-01-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143730, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
272434 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.79 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.79 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for deltamethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2012-07-25 to 2012-07-25 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143730, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
272395 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.79 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.79 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for deltamethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143733, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
273108 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate, Total . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.5 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.5 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143733, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283516 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Esfenvalerate. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for esfenvalerate is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of esfenvalerate were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Esfenvalerate |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-09 and 2018-01-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143733, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
273152 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate, Total . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.5 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.5 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143733, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
273261 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate, Total . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.5 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.5 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143733, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
273263 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate, Total . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.5 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.5 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143733, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
273092 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate, Total . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.5 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.5 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2012-07-25 to 2012-07-25 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143733, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
273221 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate, Total . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.5 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.5 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2012-07-25 to 2012-07-25 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143733, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283480 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Esfenvalerate. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for esfenvalerate is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of esfenvalerate were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Esfenvalerate |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-09 and 2018-01-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148806, PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons)
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
275091 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons) . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for total PAHs is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 22800 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148806, PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons)
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
275203 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons) . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for total PAHs is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 22800 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148806, PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons)
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
274964 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons) . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for total PAHs is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 22800 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2012-07-25 to 2012-07-25 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148806, PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons)
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
275160 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons) . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for total PAHs is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 22800 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2012-07-25 to 2012-07-25 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148806, PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons)
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
275149 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons) . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for total PAHs is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 22800 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148806, PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons)
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
275188 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons) . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for total PAHs is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 22800 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143736, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
275337 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin, Total . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for permethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 8.9 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 8.9 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for permethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143736, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
275477 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin, Total . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for permethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 8.9 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 8.9 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for permethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143736, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
275422 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin, Total . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for permethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 8.9 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 8.9 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for permethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143736, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
275294 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin, Total . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for permethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 8.9 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 8.9 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for permethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143736, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
275335 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin, Total . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for permethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 8.9 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 8.9 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for permethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2012-07-25 to 2012-07-25 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143736, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286469 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Permethrin. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for permethrin is 1 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of permethrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Permethrin |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-09 and 2018-01-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143736, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286519 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Permethrin. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for permethrin is 1 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of permethrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Permethrin |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-09 and 2018-01-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143736, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
275277 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin, Total . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for permethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 8.9 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 8.9 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for permethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2012-07-25 to 2012-07-25 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143723, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268664 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv). |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204R01951 ( Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd. ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-07-07 and 2015-07-07. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143723, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268786 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204CVY010 ( Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-11 and 2016-07-11. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143723, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268618 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Hyalella azteca for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2012-07-25. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204R00047 ( Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047 ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-07-25 and 2012-07-25. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143723, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268617 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Hyalella azteca for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2012-07-25. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204R00047 ( Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047 ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-07-25 and 2012-07-25. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143723, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
276099 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
| Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2012-07-25 to 2012-07-25 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143723, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287492 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The summed ratios of the pyrethroid pesticides bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, esfenvalerate, lambda-cyhalothrin, permethrin and their respective chronic concentration goals are not to exceed 1. If the freely dissolved concentrations of these pesticides were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-01-09 to 2018-01-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143723, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287559 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Pyrethroids. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The summed ratios of the pyrethroid pesticides bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, esfenvalerate, lambda-cyhalothrin, permethrin and their respective chronic concentration goals are not to exceed 1. If the freely dissolved concentrations of these pesticides were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-09 and 2018-01-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143723, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
275932 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
| Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143723, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
275915 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
| Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143723, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
275764 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
| Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143723, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268778 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204CVY010 ( Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-11 and 2016-07-11. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143723, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287625 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The summed ratios of the pyrethroid pesticides bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, esfenvalerate, lambda-cyhalothrin, permethrin and their respective chronic concentration goals are not to exceed 1. If the freely dissolved concentrations of these pesticides were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-01-09 to 2018-01-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143723, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287646 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Pyrethroids. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The summed ratios of the pyrethroid pesticides bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, esfenvalerate, lambda-cyhalothrin, permethrin and their respective chronic concentration goals are not to exceed 1. If the freely dissolved concentrations of these pesticides were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-09 and 2018-01-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143723, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
275686 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
| Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R00047 (Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2012-07-25 to 2012-07-25 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143723, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268655 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv). |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204R01951 ( Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd. ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-07-07 and 2015-07-07. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143723, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
275990 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
| Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 204R01951 (Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299715 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
STV |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY090 (Castro Valley Creek east side of Redwood Rd). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2016-07-20 and 2016-07-20 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299816 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
90th percentile |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Coliform, Fecal. The water quality threshold is based on a 30-day 90% percentile. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.1 Bacteria: Table 3-1 provides a summary of the bacterial water quality objectives and identifies the sources of those objectives. The fecal coliform objective for non-contact recreation is a 30-day 90th percentile less than 4000 MPN/100 ML. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY080 (Castro Valley Creek above confluence with Chabot Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-07-08 and 2014-07-08 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299797 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
90th percentile |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Coliform, Fecal. The water quality threshold is based on a 30-day 90% percentile. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.1 Bacteria: Table 3-1 provides a summary of the bacterial water quality objectives and identifies the sources of those objectives. The fecal coliform objective for non-contact recreation is a 30-day 90th percentile less than 4000 MPN/100 ML. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY125 (Castro Valley Creek under Castro Valley Blvd). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-07-08 and 2014-07-08 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299882 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
90th percentile |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Coliform, Fecal. The water quality threshold is based on a 30-day 90% percentile. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.1 Bacteria: Table 3-1 provides a summary of the bacterial water quality objectives and identifies the sources of those objectives. The fecal coliform objective for non-contact recreation is a 30-day 90th percentile less than 4000 MPN/100 ML. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY170 (Castro Valley Creek north side of Seaview Ave). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2015-06-30 and 2015-06-30 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299623 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
90th percentile |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Coliform, Fecal. The water quality threshold is based on a 30-day 90% percentile. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.1 Bacteria: Table 3-1 provides a summary of the bacterial water quality objectives and identifies the sources of those objectives. The fecal coliform objective for non-contact recreation is a 30-day 90th percentile less than 4000 MPN/100 ML. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY125 (Castro Valley Creek under Castro Valley Blvd). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2015-08-04 and 2015-08-04 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299625 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
90th percentile |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Coliform, Fecal. The water quality threshold is based on a 30-day 90% percentile. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.1 Bacteria: Table 3-1 provides a summary of the bacterial water quality objectives and identifies the sources of those objectives. The fecal coliform objective for non-contact recreation is a 30-day 90th percentile less than 4000 MPN/100 ML. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY150 (Castro Valley Creek north side of Heyer Ave). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2015-06-30 and 2015-06-30 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299605 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
90th percentile |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Coliform, Fecal. The water quality threshold is based on a 30-day 90% percentile. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.1 Bacteria: Table 3-1 provides a summary of the bacterial water quality objectives and identifies the sources of those objectives. The fecal coliform objective for non-contact recreation is a 30-day 90th percentile less than 4000 MPN/100 ML. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY090 (Castro Valley Creek east side of Redwood Rd). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2015-08-04 and 2015-08-04 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299814 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
90th percentile |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Coliform, Fecal. The water quality threshold is based on a 30-day 90% percentile. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.1 Bacteria: Table 3-1 provides a summary of the bacterial water quality objectives and identifies the sources of those objectives. The fecal coliform objective for non-contact recreation is a 30-day 90th percentile less than 4000 MPN/100 ML. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY140 (Castro Valley Creek North side of Berdina Rd). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-07-08 and 2014-07-08 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299580 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
90th percentile |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Coliform, Fecal. The water quality threshold is based on a 30-day 90% percentile. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.1 Bacteria: Table 3-1 provides a summary of the bacterial water quality objectives and identifies the sources of those objectives. The fecal coliform objective for non-contact recreation is a 30-day 90th percentile less than 4000 MPN/100 ML. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY120 (CV Creek Park at Castro Valley Library). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2015-06-30 and 2015-06-30 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299694 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
90th percentile |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Coliform, Fecal. The water quality threshold is based on a 30-day 90% percentile. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.1 Bacteria: Table 3-1 provides a summary of the bacterial water quality objectives and identifies the sources of those objectives. The fecal coliform objective for non-contact recreation is a 30-day 90th percentile less than 4000 MPN/100 ML. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY080 (Castro Valley Creek above confluence with Chabot Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2015-06-30 and 2015-08-04 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299815 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
90th percentile |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Coliform, Fecal. The water quality threshold is based on a 30-day 90% percentile. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.1 Bacteria: Table 3-1 provides a summary of the bacterial water quality objectives and identifies the sources of those objectives. The fecal coliform objective for non-contact recreation is a 30-day 90th percentile less than 4000 MPN/100 ML. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY150 (Castro Valley Creek north side of Heyer Ave). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-07-08 and 2014-07-08 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299840 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
STV |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY080 (Castro Valley Creek above confluence with Chabot Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-07-08 and 2014-07-08 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299817 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
STV |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY150 (Castro Valley Creek north side of Heyer Ave). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-07-08 and 2014-07-08 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299672 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
STV |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY170 (Castro Valley Creek north side of Seaview Ave). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2015-06-30 and 2015-06-30 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299689 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
STV |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY125 (Castro Valley Creek under Castro Valley Blvd). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2015-08-04 and 2015-08-04 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299712 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
STV |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY125 (Castro Valley Creek under Castro Valley Blvd). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2016-07-20 and 2016-07-20 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299857 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
STV |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY120 (CV Creek Park at Castro Valley Library). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2015-06-30 and 2015-06-30 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299671 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
STV |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY090 (Castro Valley Creek east side of Redwood Rd). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2015-08-04 and 2015-08-04 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299645 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
90th percentile |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Coliform, Fecal. The water quality threshold is based on a 30-day 90% percentile. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.1 Bacteria: Table 3-1 provides a summary of the bacterial water quality objectives and identifies the sources of those objectives. The fecal coliform objective for non-contact recreation is a 30-day 90th percentile less than 4000 MPN/100 ML. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY084 (Castro Valley Creek south side of Grove Way). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2015-08-04 and 2015-08-04 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299560 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
STV |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY084 (Castro Valley Creek south side of Grove Way). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2015-08-04 and 2015-08-04 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299668 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
STV |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 2 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY080 (Castro Valley Creek above confluence with Chabot Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2015-06-30 and 2015-08-04 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299562 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
STV |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY150 (Castro Valley Creek north side of Heyer Ave). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2015-06-30 and 2015-06-30 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299838 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
STV |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY125 (Castro Valley Creek under Castro Valley Blvd). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-07-08 and 2014-07-08 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299734 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
STV |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY084 (Castro Valley Creek south side of Grove Way). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2016-07-20 and 2016-07-20 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299836 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
STV |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY140 (Castro Valley Creek North side of Berdina Rd). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-07-08 and 2014-07-08 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148492, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299780 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
STV |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 204CVY080 (Castro Valley Creek above confluence with Chabot Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2016-07-20 and 2016-07-20 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143721, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268794 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204CVY010 ( Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-11 and 2016-07-11. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143721, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268664 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv). |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204R01951 ( Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd. ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-07-07 and 2015-07-07. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143721, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268626 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 2 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female, Selenastrum capricornutum for Total Cell Count, Hyalella azteca for Survival, Ceriodaphnia dubia for Survival, Pimephales promelas for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Pimephales promelas for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Pimephales promelas for Biomass (wt/orig indiv) on 2012-03-14, Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2012-03-14. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204R00047 ( Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047 ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-03-14 and 2012-07-25. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143721, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268776 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
2 of the 2 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Chironomus dilutus for Survival on 2018-01-09, Chironomus dilutus for Survival on 2018-03-01. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204CVY010 ( Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-09 and 2018-03-01. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143721, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268770 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
TST |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. All samples met the requirements of the State Policy for Water Quality Control: Toxicity Provisions. This includes utilizing the Test of Significant Toxicity (TST) and using toxicity testing methods provided in the Provisions to assess water column toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Selenastrum capricornutum for Total Cell Count, Pimephales promelas for Biomass (wt/orig indiv). |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Attainment of the water quality objective is demonstrated by conducting aquatic toxicity testing, analyzing the data using the TST statistical approach, and rejecting the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is toxic because the response (e.g., survival, reproduction, growth) of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is less than or equal to 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. The alternative hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is not toxic because the of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is greater than 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity Provisions to the Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204CVY010 ( Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-11 and 2016-07-11. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143721, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268785 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204CVY010 ( Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-11 and 2016-07-11. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143721, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268657 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 2 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female, Selenastrum capricornutum for Total Cell Count, Hyalella azteca for Survival, Ceriodaphnia dubia for Survival, Pimephales promelas for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Pimephales promelas for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Pimephales promelas for Biomass (wt/orig indiv) on 2012-03-14, Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2012-03-14. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204R00047 ( Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047 ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-03-14 and 2012-07-25. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143721, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268697 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
TST |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. All samples met the requirements of the State Policy for Water Quality Control: Toxicity Provisions. This includes utilizing the Test of Significant Toxicity (TST) and using toxicity testing methods provided in the Provisions to assess water column toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Selenastrum capricornutum for Total Cell Count, Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Attainment of the water quality objective is demonstrated by conducting aquatic toxicity testing, analyzing the data using the TST statistical approach, and rejecting the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is toxic because the response (e.g., survival, reproduction, growth) of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is less than or equal to 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. The alternative hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is not toxic because the of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is greater than 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity Provisions to the Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204CVY010 ( Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-09 and 2018-01-09. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143721, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268617 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Hyalella azteca for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2012-07-25. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204R00047 ( Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047 ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-07-25 and 2012-07-25. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143721, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268687 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
2 of the 3 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Survival, Ceriodaphnia dubia for Survival, Pimephales promelas for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Selenastrum capricornutum for Total Cell Count, Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2015-02-06, Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2015-04-07. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204R01951 ( Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd. ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-06 and 2015-07-07. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143721, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268786 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204CVY010 ( Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-11 and 2016-07-11. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143721, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268655 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv). |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204R01951 ( Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd. ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-07-07 and 2015-07-07. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143721, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268618 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Hyalella azteca for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2012-07-25. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204R00047 ( Castro Valley Cr_BA_2012-204R00047 ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-07-25 and 2012-07-25. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143721, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268870 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
TST |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. All samples met the requirements of the State Policy for Water Quality Control: Toxicity Provisions. This includes utilizing the Test of Significant Toxicity (TST) and using toxicity testing methods provided in the Provisions to assess water column toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Selenastrum capricornutum for Total Cell Count, Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Attainment of the water quality objective is demonstrated by conducting aquatic toxicity testing, analyzing the data using the TST statistical approach, and rejecting the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is toxic because the response (e.g., survival, reproduction, growth) of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is less than or equal to 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. The alternative hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is not toxic because the of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is greater than 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity Provisions to the Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204CVY010 ( Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-09 and 2018-01-09. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143721, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268761 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
TST |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. All samples met the requirements of the State Policy for Water Quality Control: Toxicity Provisions. This includes utilizing the Test of Significant Toxicity (TST) and using toxicity testing methods provided in the Provisions to assess water column toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Selenastrum capricornutum for Total Cell Count, Pimephales promelas for Biomass (wt/orig indiv). |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Attainment of the water quality objective is demonstrated by conducting aquatic toxicity testing, analyzing the data using the TST statistical approach, and rejecting the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is toxic because the response (e.g., survival, reproduction, growth) of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is less than or equal to 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. The alternative hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is not toxic because the of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is greater than 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity Provisions to the Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204CVY010 ( Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-11 and 2016-07-11. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143721, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268778 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204CVY010 ( Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-11 and 2016-07-11. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143721, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283853 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fipronil |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fipronil. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
UC Davis Aquatic Life Criteria: Aquatic life should not be affected unacceptably if the four-day average concentration of fipronil does not exceed 0.0032 ug/L (3.2 ng/L) in the water column more than once every three years on average (Bower, et al. 2017). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water and Sediment Quality Criteria Report for Fipronil. Phase III: Application of the pesticide water and sediment quality criteria methodologies. Department of Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Davis. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-09 and 2018-03-01 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143721, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283894 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fipronil |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fipronil. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
UC Davis Aquatic Life Criteria: Aquatic life should not be affected unacceptably if the four-day average concentration of fipronil does not exceed 0.0032 ug/L (3.2 ng/L) in the water column more than once every three years on average (Bower, et al. 2017). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water and Sediment Quality Criteria Report for Fipronil. Phase III: Application of the pesticide water and sediment quality criteria methodologies. Department of Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Davis. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204CVY010 (Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-09 and 2018-03-01 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143721, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268807 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
2 of the 2 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Chironomus dilutus for Survival on 2018-01-09, Chironomus dilutus for Survival on 2018-03-01. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204CVY010 ( Castro Valley Cr above USGS gauging station ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-09 and 2018-03-01. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143721, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268570 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
2 of the 3 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 for Castro Valley Creek (Alameda) exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Survival, Ceriodaphnia dubia for Survival, Pimephales promelas for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Selenastrum capricornutum for Total Cell Count, Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2015-02-06, Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2015-04-07. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 204R01951 ( Castro Valley Creek approx 150 m south of Castro Valley Blvd. ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-06 and 2015-07-07. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
| |