Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144434, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277285 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02327 (Zone 5, Line F-1 upstream of Sycamore St.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-13 and 2015-05-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144434, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
276701 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00878 (Zone 5 Line B near Paseo Padre-205R00878). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-04-24 and 2013-04-24 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144434, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
276700 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00535 (Line 5-F-1_BA_2012-205R00535). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-20 and 2012-06-20 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144434, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
276702 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R01479 (Zone 5 Line J-2 above Regents Blvd in Union City). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-15 and 2014-04-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144434, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
276720 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02583 (Zone 5 Line D upstream of Cherry St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-13 and 2015-05-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144434, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
276703 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R01735 (Zone 5 Line J-2 north of Jean Dr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-07 and 2015-05-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151022, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278094 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R01479 (Zone 5 Line J-2 above Regents Blvd in Union City). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-15 and 2014-04-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151022, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278095 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02583 (Zone 5 Line D upstream of Cherry St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-13 and 2015-05-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151022, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278410 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R03015 (Zone 5 Line J-3 approx 200 m upstream of Regents Blvd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-25 and 2016-05-25 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151022, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278251 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R01735 (Zone 5 Line J-2 north of Jean Dr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-07 and 2015-05-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151022, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278411 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04911 (Plummer Creek approx 80m upstream of Birch St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-05-19 and 2020-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151022, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280218 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00535 (Line 5-F-1_BA_2012-205R00535). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-20 and 2012-06-20 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151022, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278252 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02327 (Zone 5, Line F-1 upstream of Sycamore St.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-13 and 2015-05-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151022, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278073 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00878 (Zone 5 Line B near Paseo Padre-205R00878). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-04-24 and 2013-04-24 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151022, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279839 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R01479 (Zone 5 Line J-2 above Regents Blvd in Union City). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-15 and 2014-04-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151022, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279599 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04911 (Plummer Creek approx 80m upstream of Birch St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-05-19 and 2020-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151022, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280181 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02583 (Zone 5 Line D upstream of Cherry St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-13 and 2015-05-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151022, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279605 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R01735 (Zone 5 Line J-2 north of Jean Dr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-07 and 2015-05-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151022, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280028 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00878 (Zone 5 Line B near Paseo Padre-205R00878). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-04-24 and 2013-04-24 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151022, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280048 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02327 (Zone 5, Line F-1 upstream of Sycamore St.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-13 and 2015-05-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151022, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278210 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00535 (Line 5-F-1_BA_2012-205R00535). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-20 and 2012-06-20 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151022, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280046 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R03015 (Zone 5 Line J-3 approx 200 m upstream of Regents Blvd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-25 and 2016-05-25 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154155, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306690 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R02327 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.245762 to 0.245762. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R02327. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/13/2015 to 5/13/2015. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154155, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306700 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R02583 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.344141 to 0.344141. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R02583. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/13/2015 to 5/13/2015. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154155, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306689 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 204R01735 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.212988 to 0.212988. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 204R01735. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/7/2015 to 5/7/2015. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154155, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306688 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 204R01479 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.164855 to 0.164855. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 204R01479. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 4/15/2014 to 4/15/2014. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154155, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306678 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R00878 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.167109 to 0.167109. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R00878. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 4/24/2013 to 4/24/2013. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154155, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306701 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 204R03015 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.248758 to 0.248758. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 204R03015. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/25/2016 to 5/25/2016. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154155, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306677 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R00535 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.246907 to 0.246907. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R00535. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 6/20/2012 to 6/20/2012. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144431, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281726 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02583 (Zone 5 Line D upstream of Cherry St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-13 and 2015-05-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144431, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281603 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R03015 (Zone 5 Line J-3 approx 200 m upstream of Regents Blvd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-25 and 2016-05-25 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144431, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282102 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R01479 (Zone 5 Line J-2 above Regents Blvd in Union City). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-15 and 2014-04-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144431, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281817 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00878 (Zone 5 Line B near Paseo Padre-205R00878). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-04-24 and 2013-04-24 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144431, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281638 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04911 (Plummer Creek approx 80m upstream of Birch St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-05-19 and 2020-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144431, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282154 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00535 (Line 5-F-1_BA_2012-205R00535). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-20 and 2012-06-20 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144431, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281577 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02327 (Zone 5, Line F-1 upstream of Sycamore St.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-13 and 2015-05-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144431, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281578 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R01735 (Zone 5 Line J-2 north of Jean Dr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-07 and 2015-05-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144432, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282480 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R03015 (Zone 5 Line J-3 approx 200 m upstream of Regents Blvd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-25 and 2016-05-25 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144432, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282763 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00878 (Zone 5 Line B near Paseo Padre-205R00878). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-04-24 and 2013-04-24 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144432, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282636 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04911 (Plummer Creek approx 80m upstream of Birch St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-05-19 and 2020-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144432, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282481 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02583 (Zone 5 Line D upstream of Cherry St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-13 and 2015-05-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144432, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282332 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R01479 (Zone 5 Line J-2 above Regents Blvd in Union City). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-15 and 2014-04-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144432, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282331 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R01735 (Zone 5 Line J-2 north of Jean Dr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-07 and 2015-05-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144432, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282615 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02327 (Zone 5, Line F-1 upstream of Sycamore St.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-13 and 2015-05-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144432, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282805 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00535 (Line 5-F-1_BA_2012-205R00535). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-20 and 2012-06-20 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144433, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285847 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R01735 (Zone 5 Line J-2 north of Jean Dr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-07 and 2015-05-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144433, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285958 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00535 (Line 5-F-1_BA_2012-205R00535). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-20 and 2012-06-20 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144433, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286476 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R03015 (Zone 5 Line J-3 approx 200 m upstream of Regents Blvd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-25 and 2016-05-25 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144433, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285846 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R01479 (Zone 5 Line J-2 above Regents Blvd in Union City). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-15 and 2014-04-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144433, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285728 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02327 (Zone 5, Line F-1 upstream of Sycamore St.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-13 and 2015-05-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144433, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286477 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04911 (Plummer Creek approx 80m upstream of Birch St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-05-19 and 2020-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144433, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285848 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02583 (Zone 5 Line D upstream of Cherry St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-13 and 2015-05-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 144433, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285956 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00878 (Zone 5 Line B near Paseo Padre-205R00878). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-04-24 and 2013-04-24 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148118, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
298887 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02327 (Zone 5, Line F-1 upstream of Sycamore St.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-13 and 2015-05-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148118, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
299058 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00878 (Zone 5 Line B near Paseo Padre-205R00878). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-04-24 and 2013-04-24 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148118, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
298993 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R03015 (Zone 5 Line J-3 approx 200 m upstream of Regents Blvd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-25 and 2016-05-25 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148118, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
298568 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02583 (Zone 5 Line D upstream of Cherry St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-13 and 2015-05-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148118, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
298774 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00535 (Line 5-F-1_BA_2012-205R00535). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-20 and 2012-06-20 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148118, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
299051 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R01735 (Zone 5 Line J-2 north of Jean Dr.). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-07 and 2015-05-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148118, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
299025 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04911 (Plummer Creek approx 80m upstream of Birch St). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-05-19 and 2020-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148118, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
299018 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Southern Alameda County Flood Control Channels (Alameda County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 204R01479 (Zone 5 Line J-2 above Regents Blvd in Union City). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-15 and 2014-04-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|