Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 133918, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 8 |
East Fork City Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
234873 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Ancillary Line of Evidence |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed US Forest Service, San Bernardino National Forest (California) data for East Fork City Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
WQ data from the federal Water Quality Portal (WQP) assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 8. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved oxygen content of surface waters shall not be depressed below 6 mg/L for waters designated COLD as a result of controllable water quality factors (Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana Basin, Chapter 4 Water Quality Objectives, Inland Surface Waters). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: SANBERNARDINONATIONALFOREST-EFCTYCR1 (East Fork City Creek). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-02-03 and 2016-02-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2020. The data included in this LOE does not have a QAPP, but was collected after the QAPP requirements had been developed, and thus was assessed as an ancillary line of evidence.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
The data included in this LOE does not have a QAPP, but was collected after the QAPP requirements had been developed, and thus was assessed as an ancillary line of evidence. |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 133919, pH
|
Region 8 |
East Fork City Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
234878 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Ancillary Line of Evidence |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed US Forest Service, San Bernardino National Forest (California) data for East Fork City Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
WQ data from the federal Water Quality Portal (WQP) assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 8. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The pH of inland surface waters shall not be raised above 8.5 or depressed below 6.5 as a result of controllable water quality factors (The Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana Basin, Chapter 4 Water Quality Objectives, Inland Surface Waters). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: SANBERNARDINONATIONALFOREST-EFCTYCR1 (East Fork City Creek). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-02-03 and 2016-02-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2020. The data included in this LOE does not have a QAPP, but was collected after the QAPP requirements had been developed, and thus was assessed as an ancillary line of evidence.. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
The data included in this LOE does not have a QAPP, but was collected after the QAPP requirements had been developed, and thus was assessed as an ancillary line of evidence. |
|