Water Body Name: | Rattlesnake Reservoir (Orange County) |
Water Body ID: | CAL8011100020210720053383 |
Water Body Type: | Lake & Reservoir |
DECISION ID |
150601 |
Region 8 |
Rattlesnake Reservoir (Orange County) |
||
Pollutant: | Ammonia |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 316368 | ||||
Pollutant: | Ammonia (Unionized) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Not Recorded | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Warm Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 4 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed eSMR_Michelson WWRF data for Rattlesnake Reservoir (Orange County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ data from the California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 8. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The chronic unionized ammonia objectives (expressed as a 4-day average in mg/L) to protect aquatic life in freshwater are pH and temperature dependent and were calculated according to the formulas specified in Table 4-4 of the Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 721444 (R-001). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-10-31 and 2020-08-05 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Irvine Ranch Water District Water Quality Laboratory. 2021. Irvine Ranch Water District Quality Manual. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Irvine Ranch Water District Quality Manual | ||||
DECISION ID |
134122 |
Region 8 |
Rattlesnake Reservoir (Orange County) |
||
Pollutant: | Chlorine |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 31 samples exceed the WARM Chlorine objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of the 31 samples exceed the WARM Chlorine objective and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 239683 | ||||
Pollutant: | Chlorine | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Not Recorded | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Warm Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 15 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed eSMR_Michelson WWRF data for Rattlesnake Reservoir (Orange County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 15 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ data from the California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 8. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | To protect aquatic life, the chlorine residual in wastewater discharged to inland surface waters shall not exceed 0.1 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana Basin, Chapter 4 Water Quality Objectives, Inland Surface Waters). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 747285 (M-003B). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-07-02 and 2020-10-08 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Irvine Ranch Water District Water Quality Laboratory. 2021. Irvine Ranch Water District Quality Manual. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Irvine Ranch Water District Quality Manual | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 239681 | ||||
Pollutant: | Chlorine | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Not Recorded | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Warm Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 16 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed eSMR_Michelson WWRF data for Rattlesnake Reservoir (Orange County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 16 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ data from the California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 8. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | To protect aquatic life, the chlorine residual in wastewater discharged to inland surface waters shall not exceed 0.1 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana Basin, Chapter 4 Water Quality Objectives, Inland Surface Waters). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 721444 (R-001). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-08-14 and 2020-10-08 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Irvine Ranch Water District Water Quality Laboratory. 2021. Irvine Ranch Water District Quality Manual. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Irvine Ranch Water District Quality Manual | ||||
DECISION ID |
134123 |
Region 8 |
Rattlesnake Reservoir (Orange County) |
||
Pollutant: | Chromium, trivalent |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 239690 | ||||
Pollutant: | Chromium, trivalent | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Not Recorded | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Warm Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed eSMR_Michelson WWRF data for Rattlesnake Reservoir (Orange County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chromium III. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ data from the California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 8. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The dissolved chromium (III) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is hardness dependent. The criterion when calculated using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 180 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 721444 (R-001). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-07-17 and 2020-01-15 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Irvine Ranch Water District Water Quality Laboratory. 2021. Irvine Ranch Water District Quality Manual. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Irvine Ranch Water District Quality Manual | ||||
DECISION ID |
134125 |
Region 8 |
Rattlesnake Reservoir (Orange County) |
||
Pollutant: | Temperature, water |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. One of the 263 samples exceed the WARM temperature objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. One of 263 samples exceeded the WARM temperature objective and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 239656 | ||||
Pollutant: | Temperature, water | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Not Recorded | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Warm Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 263 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed eSMR_Michelson WWRF data for Rattlesnake Reservoir (Orange County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 263 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ data from the California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 8. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The temperature of waters designated WARM shall not be raised above 90 degrees F June through October or above 78 degrees F during the rest of the year as a result of controllable water quality factors (Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana Basin, Chapter 4 Water Quality Objectives, Inland Surface Waters). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 721444 (R-001). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-06-08 and 2020-10-08 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Irvine Ranch Water District Water Quality Laboratory. 2021. Irvine Ranch Water District Quality Manual. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Irvine Ranch Water District Quality Manual | ||||
DECISION ID |
134124 |
Region 8 |
Rattlesnake Reservoir (Orange County) |
||
Pollutant: | pH |
Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Sources: | A Source Unknown |
Expected TMDL Completion Date: | 2037 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 151 of the 263 samples exceed the WARM pH objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 151 of the 263 samples exceed the WARM pH objective and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 239641 | ||||
Pollutant: | pH | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Warm Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 263 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 151 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed eSMR_Michelson WWRF data for Rattlesnake Reservoir (Orange County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 151 of 263 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ data from the California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 8. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The pH of inland surface waters shall not be raised above 8.5 or depressed below 6.5 as a result of controllable water quality factors (The Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana Basin, Chapter 4 Water Quality Objectives, Inland Surface Waters). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan, Santa Ana River Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 721444 (R-001). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-06-08 and 2020-10-08 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Irvine Ranch Water District Water Quality Laboratory. 2021. Irvine Ranch Water District Quality Manual. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Irvine Ranch Water District Quality Manual | ||||