Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277278 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-28 and 2015-04-28 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
93231 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
4 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staffassessed SWAMP data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
RWB2 Urbanization Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Alkalinity as CaCO3 criteria for the protection of freshwater aquatic life is 20000 ug/L (National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2009). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Saratoga Creek was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ Saratoga near Hakone Gardens - 205SAR080, Saratoga inside SCVWD gate - below Walnut Ave - 205SAR070, Saratoga behind Lutheran school - Saratoga Ave and Braemar - 205SAR060, Saratoga above Congress Springs Park - 205SAR057] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/21/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277056 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00170 (Saratoga Creek at Saratoga Springs Resort-205R00170). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-29 and 2013-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
276894 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00355 (Saratoga Creek - 200 m downstream Lawrence Exp-205R00355). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-13 and 2012-06-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277389 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00355 (Saratoga Creek - 200 m downstream Lawrence Exp-205R00355). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-13 and 2012-06-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277057 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01091 (Saratoga Creek at Bowers Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277072 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01091 (Saratoga Creek at Bowers Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277036 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277241 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00067 (San Thomas Aquino - 300 m downstream Central Expy-205R00067). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-03 and 2012-06-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277352 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00058 (Saratoga Creek - 300 m downstream Booker Cr confluence-205R00058). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-05-15 and 2012-05-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277058 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-28 and 2015-04-28 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277242 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00170 (Saratoga Creek at Saratoga Springs Resort-205R00170). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-29 and 2013-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277059 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277390 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00067 (San Thomas Aquino - 300 m downstream Central Expy-205R00067). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-03 and 2012-06-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
276895 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00058 (Saratoga Creek - 300 m downstream Booker Cr confluence-205R00058). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-05-15 and 2012-05-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142179, Anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269671 |
|
Pollutant: |
Anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for anthracene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 845 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142179, Anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269651 |
|
Pollutant: |
Anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for anthracene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 845 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142179, Anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269592 |
|
Pollutant: |
Anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for anthracene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 845 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142179, Anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269568 |
|
Pollutant: |
Anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for anthracene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 845 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142179, Anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269680 |
|
Pollutant: |
Anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for anthracene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 845 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142179, Anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269676 |
|
Pollutant: |
Anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for anthracene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 845 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142179, Anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269572 |
|
Pollutant: |
Anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for anthracene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 845 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142179, Anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269530 |
|
Pollutant: |
Anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for anthracene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 845 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142179, Anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269610 |
|
Pollutant: |
Anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for anthracene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 845 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142179, Anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269672 |
|
Pollutant: |
Anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for anthracene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 845 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142179, Anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269675 |
|
Pollutant: |
Anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for anthracene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 845 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142179, Anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269532 |
|
Pollutant: |
Anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for anthracene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 845 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142179, Anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269697 |
|
Pollutant: |
Anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for anthracene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 845 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142179, Anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269554 |
|
Pollutant: |
Anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for anthracene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 845 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142181, Arsenic
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269783 |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Arsenic . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for arsenic is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 33 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142181, Arsenic
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269962 |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Arsenic . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for arsenic is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 33 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142181, Arsenic
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269585 |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Arsenic . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for arsenic is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 33 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142181, Arsenic
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269686 |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Arsenic . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for arsenic is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 33 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142181, Arsenic
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269861 |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Arsenic . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for arsenic is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 33 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142181, Arsenic
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269938 |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Arsenic . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for arsenic is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 33 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142181, Arsenic
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269647 |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Arsenic . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for arsenic is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 33 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142181, Arsenic
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269917 |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Arsenic . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for arsenic is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 33 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142181, Arsenic
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269858 |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Arsenic . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for arsenic is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 33 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142181, Arsenic
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269959 |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Arsenic . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for arsenic is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 33 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142181, Arsenic
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269838 |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Arsenic . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for arsenic is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 33 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142181, Arsenic
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269895 |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Arsenic . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for arsenic is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 33 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142181, Arsenic
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270023 |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Arsenic . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for arsenic is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 33 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142181, Arsenic
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269771 |
|
Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Arsenic . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for arsenic is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 33 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306444 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R00355 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.638198 to 0.638198. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R00355. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 6/13/2012 to 6/13/2012. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306466 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R01411 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.415538 to 0.415538. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R01411. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/19/2015 to 5/19/2015. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268796 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
TST |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. All samples met the requirements of the State Policy for Water Quality Control: Toxicity Provisions. This includes utilizing the Test of Significant Toxicity (TST) and using toxicity testing methods provided in the Provisions to assess water column toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female, Hyalella azteca for Survival, Pimephales promelas for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Selenastrum capricornutum for Total Cell Count. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female on 2017-07-13. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Attainment of the water quality objective is demonstrated by conducting aquatic toxicity testing, analyzing the data using the TST statistical approach, and rejecting the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is toxic because the response (e.g., survival, reproduction, growth) of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is less than or equal to 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. The alternative hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is not toxic because the of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is greater than 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity Provisions to the Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-07-13 and 2017-07-13. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268879 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Chironomus dilutus for Survival on 2020-07-22. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-07-22 and 2020-07-22. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268801 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Chironomus dilutus for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Chironomus dilutus for Survival on 2016-07-11. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-11 and 2016-07-11. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268781 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Chironomus dilutus for Survival on 2017-07-13. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-07-13 and 2017-07-13. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279529 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03843 (San Tomas Aquino Creek upstream Highway 101). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-29 and 2018-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280228 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04591 (San Thomas Aquino Creek between Agnew Rd and Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-07 and 2019-05-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306430 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205SAR060 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.843832853 to 0.88520249. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205SAR060. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/21/2008 to 5/13/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected using Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program protocols |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306492 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R03843 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.387164229 to 0.387164229. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R03843. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/29/2018 to 5/29/2018. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306431 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205SAR070 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.690361568 to 0.739486243. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205SAR070. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/21/2008 to 5/14/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected using Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program protocols |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306443 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R00067 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.3881 to 0.3881. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R00067. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 6/3/2012 to 6/3/2012. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306454 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R00170 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 1.03393 to 1.03393. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R00170. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/29/2013 to 5/29/2013. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306420 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205SAR057 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.680186468 to 0.686578144. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205SAR057. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/21/2008 to 5/13/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected using Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program protocols |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306432 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205SAR080 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 1.08280716 to 1.126233506. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205SAR080. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/21/2008 to 5/14/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected using Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program protocols |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306479 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R03619 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.62631548 to 0.62631548. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R03619. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/8/2018 to 5/8/2018. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306442 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R00058 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 1.14984 to 1.14984. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R00058. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/15/2012 to 5/15/2012. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306490 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R03562 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 1.083527046 to 1.083527046. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R03562. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/23/2018 to 5/23/2018. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306456 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R01706 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.71767 to 0.71767. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R01706. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 4/28/2015 to 4/28/2015. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306467 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R02474 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.816713 to 0.816713. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R02474. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/18/2016 to 5/18/2016. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306478 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R03306 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.874919207 to 0.874919207. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R03306. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/9/2017 to 5/9/2017. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306480 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R03498 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 1.140709826 to 1.140709826. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R03498. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/23/2018 to 5/23/2018. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306468 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R02730 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.28918 to 0.28918. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R02730. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 6/1/2016 to 6/1/2016. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306491 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R00746 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 1.119940453 to 1.119940453. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R00746. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/24/2018 to 5/24/2018. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306455 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R01091 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.307395 to 0.307395. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R01091. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/5/2014 to 5/5/2014. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306419 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205CE0356 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.468199056 to 0.468199056. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205CE0356. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/29/2007 to 5/29/2007. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected using Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program protocols |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142183, Benzo(a)anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270086 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benz(a)anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benz[a]anthrazene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1050 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142183, Benzo(a)anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269906 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benz(a)anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benz[a]anthrazene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1050 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142183, Benzo(a)anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270108 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benz(a)anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benz[a]anthrazene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1050 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142183, Benzo(a)anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270012 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benz(a)anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benz[a]anthrazene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1050 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142183, Benzo(a)anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269984 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benz(a)anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benz[a]anthrazene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1050 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142183, Benzo(a)anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269972 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benz(a)anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benz[a]anthrazene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1050 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142183, Benzo(a)anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269891 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benz(a)anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benz[a]anthrazene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1050 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142183, Benzo(a)anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269870 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benz(a)anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benz[a]anthrazene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1050 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142183, Benzo(a)anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269926 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benz(a)anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benz[a]anthrazene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1050 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142183, Benzo(a)anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269924 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benz(a)anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benz[a]anthrazene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1050 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142183, Benzo(a)anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269965 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benz(a)anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benz[a]anthrazene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1050 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142183, Benzo(a)anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269871 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benz(a)anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benz[a]anthrazene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1050 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142183, Benzo(a)anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
269987 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benz(a)anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benz[a]anthrazene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1050 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142183, Benzo(a)anthracene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270051 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)anthracene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benz(a)anthracene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benz[a]anthrazene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1050 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142182, Benzo(a)pyrene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270186 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benzo(a)pyrene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benzo[a]pyrene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1450 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142182, Benzo(a)pyrene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270309 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benzo(a)pyrene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benzo[a]pyrene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1450 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142182, Benzo(a)pyrene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270312 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benzo(a)pyrene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benzo[a]pyrene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1450 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142182, Benzo(a)pyrene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270251 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benzo(a)pyrene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benzo[a]pyrene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1450 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142182, Benzo(a)pyrene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270269 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benzo(a)pyrene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benzo[a]pyrene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1450 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142182, Benzo(a)pyrene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270332 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benzo(a)pyrene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benzo[a]pyrene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1450 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142182, Benzo(a)pyrene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270133 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benzo(a)pyrene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benzo[a]pyrene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1450 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142182, Benzo(a)pyrene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270349 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benzo(a)pyrene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benzo[a]pyrene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1450 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142182, Benzo(a)pyrene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270135 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benzo(a)pyrene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benzo[a]pyrene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1450 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142182, Benzo(a)pyrene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270307 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benzo(a)pyrene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benzo[a]pyrene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1450 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142182, Benzo(a)pyrene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270430 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benzo(a)pyrene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benzo[a]pyrene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1450 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142182, Benzo(a)pyrene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270284 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benzo(a)pyrene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benzo[a]pyrene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1450 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142182, Benzo(a)pyrene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270310 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benzo(a)pyrene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benzo[a]pyrene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1450 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142182, Benzo(a)pyrene
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270287 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benzo(a)pyrene . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for benzo[a]pyrene is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 1450 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270200 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270281 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270394 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280408 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for bifenthrin is 0.1 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of bifenthrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Bifenthrin |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-01-08 to 2018-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270202 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270275 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270340 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270127 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280622 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for bifenthrin is 0.1 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of bifenthrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Bifenthrin |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-01-08 to 2018-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270375 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270243 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270274 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270259 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270282 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270176 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270383 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142184, Cadmium
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270649 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cadmium . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cadmium is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 4.98 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142184, Cadmium
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270165 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cadmium . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cadmium is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 4.98 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142184, Cadmium
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270470 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cadmium . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cadmium is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 4.98 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142184, Cadmium
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270571 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cadmium . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cadmium is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 4.98 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142184, Cadmium
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270590 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cadmium . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cadmium is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 4.98 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142184, Cadmium
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270635 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cadmium . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cadmium is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 4.98 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142184, Cadmium
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270471 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cadmium . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cadmium is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 4.98 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142184, Cadmium
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270491 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cadmium . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cadmium is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 4.98 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142184, Cadmium
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270624 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cadmium . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cadmium is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 4.98 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142184, Cadmium
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270587 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cadmium . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cadmium is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 4.98 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142184, Cadmium
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270703 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cadmium . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cadmium is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 4.98 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142184, Cadmium
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270440 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cadmium . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cadmium is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 4.98 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142184, Cadmium
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270462 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cadmium . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cadmium is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 4.98 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142184, Cadmium
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270169 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cadmium . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cadmium is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 4.98 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281266 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02474 (Wildwood Park in Saratoga). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-18 and 2016-05-18 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280770 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04670 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 Congress Springs Ln). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-09 and 2019-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280655 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04479 (Saratoga Creek u/s Warburton Ave). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-12 and 2019-06-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281827 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04479 (Saratoga Creek u/s Warburton Ave). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-12 and 2019-06-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281829 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03562 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Tollgate Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281538 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-28 and 2015-04-28 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280657 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03306 (Saratoga Creek upstream via Real). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-05-09 and 2017-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281687 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04591 (San Thomas Aquino Creek between Agnew Rd and Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-07 and 2019-05-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281945 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00355 (Saratoga Creek - 200 m downstream Lawrence Exp-205R00355). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-13 and 2012-06-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281074 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04479 (Saratoga Creek u/s Warburton Ave). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-12 and 2019-06-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282059 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00067 (San Thomas Aquino - 300 m downstream Central Expy-205R00067). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-03 and 2012-06-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281825 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03619 (Saratoga Creek at Murdoch Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-08 and 2018-05-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281925 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00058 (Saratoga Creek - 300 m downstream Booker Cr confluence-205R00058). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-05-15 and 2012-05-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281317 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03562 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Tollgate Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281236 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281335 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04670 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 Congress Springs Ln). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-09 and 2019-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280713 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02730 (Upstream Cox). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-01 and 2016-06-01 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281265 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280743 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00058 (Saratoga Creek - 300 m downstream Booker Cr confluence-205R00058). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-05-15 and 2012-05-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281197 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03562 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Tollgate Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281026 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03619 (Saratoga Creek at Murdoch Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-08 and 2018-05-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281823 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-28 and 2015-04-28 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280879 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03498 (Saratoga Creek upstream 4th Street). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280899 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00170 (Saratoga Creek at Saratoga Springs Resort-205R00170). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-29 and 2013-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281178 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00746 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Pierce Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-24 and 2018-05-24 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280746 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01091 (Saratoga Creek at Bowers Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281648 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03306 (Saratoga Creek upstream via Real). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-05-09 and 2017-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282196 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01091 (Saratoga Creek at Bowers Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282096 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03498 (Saratoga Creek upstream 4th Street). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281743 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03306 (Saratoga Creek upstream via Real). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-05-09 and 2017-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281395 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04670 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 Congress Springs Ln). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-09 and 2019-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281503 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00067 (San Thomas Aquino - 300 m downstream Central Expy-205R00067). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-03 and 2012-06-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280816 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03619 (Saratoga Creek at Murdoch Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-08 and 2018-05-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281264 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01091 (Saratoga Creek at Bowers Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281301 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00058 (Saratoga Creek - 300 m downstream Booker Cr confluence-205R00058). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-05-15 and 2012-05-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281669 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02474 (Wildwood Park in Saratoga). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-18 and 2016-05-18 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281046 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00355 (Saratoga Creek - 200 m downstream Lawrence Exp-205R00355). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-13 and 2012-06-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281761 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03843 (San Tomas Aquino Creek upstream Highway 101). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-29 and 2018-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281263 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00170 (Saratoga Creek at Saratoga Springs Resort-205R00170). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-29 and 2013-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281097 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00355 (Saratoga Creek - 200 m downstream Lawrence Exp-205R00355). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-13 and 2012-06-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282097 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00170 (Saratoga Creek at Saratoga Springs Resort-205R00170). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-29 and 2013-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280966 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MO |