Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277278 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-28 and 2015-04-28 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
93231 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
4 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staffassessed SWAMP data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
RWB2 Urbanization Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The Alkalinity as CaCO3 criteria for the protection of freshwater aquatic life is 20000 ug/L (National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2009). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Saratoga Creek was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ Saratoga near Hakone Gardens - 205SAR080, Saratoga inside SCVWD gate - below Walnut Ave - 205SAR070, Saratoga behind Lutheran school - Saratoga Ave and Braemar - 205SAR060, Saratoga above Congress Springs Park - 205SAR057] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/21/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277056 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00170 (Saratoga Creek at Saratoga Springs Resort-205R00170). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-29 and 2013-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
276894 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00355 (Saratoga Creek - 200 m downstream Lawrence Exp-205R00355). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-13 and 2012-06-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277389 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00355 (Saratoga Creek - 200 m downstream Lawrence Exp-205R00355). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-13 and 2012-06-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277057 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01091 (Saratoga Creek at Bowers Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277072 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01091 (Saratoga Creek at Bowers Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277036 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277241 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00067 (San Thomas Aquino - 300 m downstream Central Expy-205R00067). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-03 and 2012-06-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277352 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00058 (Saratoga Creek - 300 m downstream Booker Cr confluence-205R00058). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-05-15 and 2012-05-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277058 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-28 and 2015-04-28 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277242 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00170 (Saratoga Creek at Saratoga Springs Resort-205R00170). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-29 and 2013-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277059 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277390 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00067 (San Thomas Aquino - 300 m downstream Central Expy-205R00067). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-03 and 2012-06-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142210, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
276895 |
|
Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00058 (Saratoga Creek - 300 m downstream Booker Cr confluence-205R00058). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-05-15 and 2012-05-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306444 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R00355 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.638198 to 0.638198. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R00355. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 6/13/2012 to 6/13/2012. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306466 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R01411 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.415538 to 0.415538. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R01411. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/19/2015 to 5/19/2015. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268796 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
TST |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. All samples met the requirements of the State Policy for Water Quality Control: Toxicity Provisions. This includes utilizing the Test of Significant Toxicity (TST) and using toxicity testing methods provided in the Provisions to assess water column toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female, Hyalella azteca for Survival, Pimephales promelas for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Selenastrum capricornutum for Total Cell Count. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female on 2017-07-13. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Attainment of the water quality objective is demonstrated by conducting aquatic toxicity testing, analyzing the data using the TST statistical approach, and rejecting the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is toxic because the response (e.g., survival, reproduction, growth) of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is less than or equal to 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. The alternative hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is not toxic because the of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is greater than 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity Provisions to the Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-07-13 and 2017-07-13. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268879 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Chironomus dilutus for Survival on 2020-07-22. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-07-22 and 2020-07-22. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268801 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Chironomus dilutus for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Chironomus dilutus for Survival on 2016-07-11. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-11 and 2016-07-11. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268781 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Chironomus dilutus for Survival on 2017-07-13. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-07-13 and 2017-07-13. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279529 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03843 (San Tomas Aquino Creek upstream Highway 101). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-29 and 2018-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280228 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04591 (San Thomas Aquino Creek between Agnew Rd and Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-07 and 2019-05-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306430 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205SAR060 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.843832853 to 0.88520249. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205SAR060. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/21/2008 to 5/13/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected using Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program protocols |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306492 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R03843 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.387164229 to 0.387164229. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R03843. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/29/2018 to 5/29/2018. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306431 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205SAR070 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.690361568 to 0.739486243. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205SAR070. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/21/2008 to 5/14/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected using Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program protocols |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306443 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R00067 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.3881 to 0.3881. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R00067. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 6/3/2012 to 6/3/2012. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306454 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R00170 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 1.03393 to 1.03393. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R00170. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/29/2013 to 5/29/2013. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306420 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205SAR057 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.680186468 to 0.686578144. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205SAR057. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/21/2008 to 5/13/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected using Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program protocols |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306432 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205SAR080 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 1.08280716 to 1.126233506. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205SAR080. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/21/2008 to 5/14/2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected using Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program protocols |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306479 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R03619 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.62631548 to 0.62631548. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R03619. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/8/2018 to 5/8/2018. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306442 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R00058 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 1.14984 to 1.14984. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R00058. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/15/2012 to 5/15/2012. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306490 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R03562 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 1.083527046 to 1.083527046. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R03562. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/23/2018 to 5/23/2018. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306456 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R01706 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.71767 to 0.71767. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R01706. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 4/28/2015 to 4/28/2015. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306467 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R02474 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.816713 to 0.816713. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R02474. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/18/2016 to 5/18/2016. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306478 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R03306 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.874919207 to 0.874919207. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R03306. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/9/2017 to 5/9/2017. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306480 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R03498 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 1.140709826 to 1.140709826. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R03498. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/23/2018 to 5/23/2018. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306468 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R02730 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.28918 to 0.28918. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R02730. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 6/1/2016 to 6/1/2016. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306491 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R00746 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 1.119940453 to 1.119940453. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R00746. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/24/2018 to 5/24/2018. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306455 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205R01091 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.307395 to 0.307395. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205R01091. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/5/2014 to 5/5/2014. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected according to BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition sampling protocols. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154208, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
306419 |
|
Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 205CE0356 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.468199056 to 0.468199056. |
Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 205CE0356. |
Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/29/2007 to 5/29/2007. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data were collected using Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program protocols |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270200 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270281 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270394 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280408 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for bifenthrin is 0.1 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of bifenthrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Bifenthrin |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-01-08 to 2018-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270202 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270275 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270340 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270127 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280622 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for bifenthrin is 0.1 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of bifenthrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Bifenthrin |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-01-08 to 2018-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270375 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270243 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270274 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270259 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270282 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270176 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142208, Bifenthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
270383 |
|
Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Bifenthrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for bifenthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.43 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.43 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for bifenthrin (Amweg et al., 2005 and Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281266 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02474 (Wildwood Park in Saratoga). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-18 and 2016-05-18 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280770 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04670 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 Congress Springs Ln). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-09 and 2019-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280655 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04479 (Saratoga Creek u/s Warburton Ave). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-12 and 2019-06-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281827 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04479 (Saratoga Creek u/s Warburton Ave). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-12 and 2019-06-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281829 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03562 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Tollgate Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281538 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-28 and 2015-04-28 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280657 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03306 (Saratoga Creek upstream via Real). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-05-09 and 2017-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281687 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04591 (San Thomas Aquino Creek between Agnew Rd and Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-07 and 2019-05-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281945 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00355 (Saratoga Creek - 200 m downstream Lawrence Exp-205R00355). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-13 and 2012-06-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281074 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04479 (Saratoga Creek u/s Warburton Ave). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-12 and 2019-06-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282059 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00067 (San Thomas Aquino - 300 m downstream Central Expy-205R00067). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-03 and 2012-06-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281825 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03619 (Saratoga Creek at Murdoch Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-08 and 2018-05-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281925 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00058 (Saratoga Creek - 300 m downstream Booker Cr confluence-205R00058). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-05-15 and 2012-05-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281317 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03562 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Tollgate Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281236 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281335 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04670 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 Congress Springs Ln). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-09 and 2019-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280713 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02730 (Upstream Cox). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-01 and 2016-06-01 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281265 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280743 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00058 (Saratoga Creek - 300 m downstream Booker Cr confluence-205R00058). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-05-15 and 2012-05-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281197 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03562 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Tollgate Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281026 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03619 (Saratoga Creek at Murdoch Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-08 and 2018-05-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281823 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-28 and 2015-04-28 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280879 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03498 (Saratoga Creek upstream 4th Street). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280899 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00170 (Saratoga Creek at Saratoga Springs Resort-205R00170). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-29 and 2013-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281178 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00746 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Pierce Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-24 and 2018-05-24 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280746 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01091 (Saratoga Creek at Bowers Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281648 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03306 (Saratoga Creek upstream via Real). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-05-09 and 2017-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282196 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01091 (Saratoga Creek at Bowers Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282096 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03498 (Saratoga Creek upstream 4th Street). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281743 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03306 (Saratoga Creek upstream via Real). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-05-09 and 2017-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281395 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04670 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 Congress Springs Ln). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-09 and 2019-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281503 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00067 (San Thomas Aquino - 300 m downstream Central Expy-205R00067). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-03 and 2012-06-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280816 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03619 (Saratoga Creek at Murdoch Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-08 and 2018-05-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281264 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01091 (Saratoga Creek at Bowers Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281301 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00058 (Saratoga Creek - 300 m downstream Booker Cr confluence-205R00058). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-05-15 and 2012-05-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281669 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02474 (Wildwood Park in Saratoga). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-18 and 2016-05-18 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281046 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00355 (Saratoga Creek - 200 m downstream Lawrence Exp-205R00355). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-13 and 2012-06-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281761 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03843 (San Tomas Aquino Creek upstream Highway 101). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-29 and 2018-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281263 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00170 (Saratoga Creek at Saratoga Springs Resort-205R00170). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-29 and 2013-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281097 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00355 (Saratoga Creek - 200 m downstream Lawrence Exp-205R00355). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-13 and 2012-06-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282097 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00170 (Saratoga Creek at Saratoga Springs Resort-205R00170). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-29 and 2013-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280966 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00746 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Pierce Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-24 and 2018-05-24 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281326 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02730 (Upstream Cox). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-01 and 2016-06-01 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281602 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02474 (Wildwood Park in Saratoga). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-18 and 2016-05-18 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281252 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-28 and 2015-04-28 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281624 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281200 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00067 (San Thomas Aquino - 300 m downstream Central Expy-205R00067). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-03 and 2012-06-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281665 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03498 (Saratoga Creek upstream 4th Street). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281215 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04591 (San Thomas Aquino Creek between Agnew Rd and Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-07 and 2019-05-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281267 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for chloride is 355.0 mg/l. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00746 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Pierce Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-24 and 2018-05-24 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280820 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03843 (San Tomas Aquino Creek upstream Highway 101). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-29 and 2018-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280967 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03843 (San Tomas Aquino Creek upstream Highway 101). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-29 and 2018-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280798 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04591 (San Thomas Aquino Creek between Agnew Rd and Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-07 and 2019-05-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142186, Chloride
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281699 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chloride criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 230000 ug/L (230 mg/L)(USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02730 (Upstream Cox). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-01 and 2016-06-01 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282658 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-28 and 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282187 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04479 (Saratoga Creek u/s Warburton Ave). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-12 and 2019-06-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282233 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02730 (Upstream Cox). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-01 and 2016-06-01 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282622 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282623 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01091 (Saratoga Creek at Bowers Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282562 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02474 (Wildwood Park in Saratoga). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-18 and 2016-05-18 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282584 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00067 (San Thomas Aquino - 300 m downstream Central Expy-205R00067). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-03 and 2012-06-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282244 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01091 (Saratoga Creek at Bowers Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282277 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03562 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Tollgate Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282204 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00058 (Saratoga Creek - 300 m downstream Booker Cr confluence-205R00058). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-05-15 and 2012-05-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282400 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00170 (Saratoga Creek at Saratoga Springs Resort-205R00170). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-29 and 2013-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282610 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04479 (Saratoga Creek u/s Warburton Ave). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-12 and 2019-06-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282709 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03562 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Tollgate Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282458 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02730 (Upstream Cox). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-01 and 2016-06-01 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281948 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00355 (Saratoga Creek - 200 m downstream Lawrence Exp-205R00355). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-13 and 2012-06-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282767 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03843 (San Tomas Aquino Creek upstream Highway 101). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-29 and 2018-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282325 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-28 and 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282529 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00746 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Pierce Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-24 and 2018-05-24 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282723 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03498 (Saratoga Creek upstream 4th Street). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282778 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282326 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02474 (Wildwood Park in Saratoga). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-18 and 2016-05-18 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282107 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00067 (San Thomas Aquino - 300 m downstream Central Expy-205R00067). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-03 and 2012-06-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
281969 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03843 (San Tomas Aquino Creek upstream Highway 101). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-29 and 2018-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282578 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03306 (Saratoga Creek upstream via Real). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-05-09 and 2017-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282603 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00058 (Saratoga Creek - 300 m downstream Booker Cr confluence-205R00058). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-05-15 and 2012-05-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282612 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00746 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Pierce Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-24 and 2018-05-24 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282731 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00170 (Saratoga Creek at Saratoga Springs Resort-205R00170). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-29 and 2013-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282360 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03498 (Saratoga Creek upstream 4th Street). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282051 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04670 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 Congress Springs Ln). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-09 and 2019-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282327 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03306 (Saratoga Creek upstream via Real). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-05-09 and 2017-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282812 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04670 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 Congress Springs Ln). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-09 and 2019-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142187, Chlorine
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
282730 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorine |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorine, Total Residual. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended chlorine criterion for the protection of aquatic ife in freshwater is 11 ug/L (4-day average). |
Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00355 (Saratoga Creek - 200 m downstream Lawrence Exp-205R00355). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-13 and 2012-06-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142189, Copper
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271576 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for copper is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 149 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142189, Copper
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271486 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for copper is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 149 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142189, Copper
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271362 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for copper is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 149 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142189, Copper
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271662 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for copper is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 149 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142189, Copper
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271687 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for copper is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 149 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142189, Copper
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271342 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for copper is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 149 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142189, Copper
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271410 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for copper is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 149 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142189, Copper
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271558 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for copper is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 149 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142189, Copper
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271654 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for copper is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 149 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142189, Copper
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271631 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for copper is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 149 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142189, Copper
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
283347 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Copper. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved copper criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is hardness dependent. The criterion when calculated using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 9 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-08 and 2018-05-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142189, Copper
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271401 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for copper is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 149 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142189, Copper
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
283243 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Copper. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved copper criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is hardness dependent. The criterion when calculated using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 9 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-08 and 2018-05-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142189, Copper
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
283303 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Copper. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The copper limit for irrigation and livestock watering supply is 5.0 mg/L and 0.5 mg/l, respectively. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-08 and 2018-05-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142189, Copper
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
283134 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Copper. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The copper limit for irrigation and livestock watering supply is 5.0 mg/L and 0.5 mg/l, respectively. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-08 and 2018-05-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142189, Copper
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271404 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for copper is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 149 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142189, Copper
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271706 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for copper is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 149 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142189, Copper
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271778 |
|
Pollutant: |
Copper |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for copper is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 149 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142211, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271966 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin, total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cyfluthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.1 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.1 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cyfluthrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142211, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271803 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin, total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cyfluthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.1 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.1 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cyfluthrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142211, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271783 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin, total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cyfluthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.1 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.1 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cyfluthrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142211, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271964 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin, total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cyfluthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.1 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.1 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cyfluthrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142211, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271925 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin, total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cyfluthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.1 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.1 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cyfluthrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142211, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271727 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin, total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cyfluthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.1 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.1 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cyfluthrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142211, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
283420 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cyfluthrin. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for cyfluthrin is 0.2 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of cyfluthrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Cyfluthrin |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-08 and 2018-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142211, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
283358 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cyfluthrin. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for cyfluthrin is 0.2 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of cyfluthrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Cyfluthrin |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-08 and 2018-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142211, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271887 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin, total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cyfluthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.1 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.1 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cyfluthrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142211, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271782 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin, total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cyfluthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.1 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.1 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cyfluthrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142211, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271907 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin, total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cyfluthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.1 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.1 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cyfluthrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142211, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271962 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin, total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cyfluthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.1 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.1 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cyfluthrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142211, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271840 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin, total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cyfluthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.1 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.1 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cyfluthrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142211, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272022 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin, total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cyfluthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.1 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.1 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cyfluthrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142211, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271926 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin, total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cyfluthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.1 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.1 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cyfluthrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142211, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271980 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin, total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cyfluthrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.1 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.1 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cyfluthrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142213, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271776 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyhalothrin, Total lambda- . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lambda-cyhalothrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.44 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.44 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for lambda-cyhalothrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142213, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271771 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyhalothrin, Total lambda- . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lambda-cyhalothrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.44 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.44 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for lambda-cyhalothrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142213, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271868 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyhalothrin, Total lambda- . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lambda-cyhalothrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.44 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.44 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for lambda-cyhalothrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142213, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272011 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyhalothrin, Total lambda- . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lambda-cyhalothrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.44 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.44 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for lambda-cyhalothrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142213, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271773 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyhalothrin, Total lambda- . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lambda-cyhalothrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.44 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.44 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for lambda-cyhalothrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142213, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271908 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyhalothrin, Total lambda- . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lambda-cyhalothrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.44 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.44 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for lambda-cyhalothrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142213, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271788 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyhalothrin, Total lambda- . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lambda-cyhalothrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.44 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.44 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for lambda-cyhalothrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142213, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271855 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyhalothrin, Total lambda- . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lambda-cyhalothrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.44 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.44 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for lambda-cyhalothrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142213, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271853 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyhalothrin, Total lambda- . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lambda-cyhalothrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.44 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.44 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for lambda-cyhalothrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142213, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
284384 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lambda-cyhalothrin. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for lambda-cyhalothrin is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of lambda-cyhalothrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Lambda-cyhalothrin |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-08 and 2018-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142213, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271817 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyhalothrin, Total lambda- . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lambda-cyhalothrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.44 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.44 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for lambda-cyhalothrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142213, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271749 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyhalothrin, Total lambda- . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lambda-cyhalothrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.44 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.44 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for lambda-cyhalothrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142213, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271869 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyhalothrin, Total lambda- . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lambda-cyhalothrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.44 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.44 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for lambda-cyhalothrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142213, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271791 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyhalothrin, Total lambda- . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lambda-cyhalothrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.44 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.44 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for lambda-cyhalothrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142213, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
284405 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lambda-cyhalothrin. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for lambda-cyhalothrin is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of lambda-cyhalothrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Lambda-cyhalothrin |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-08 and 2018-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142213, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271733 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyhalothrin, Total lambda- . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lambda-cyhalothrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.44 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.44 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for lambda-cyhalothrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142209, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272169 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cypermethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.3 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.3 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cypermethrin from Maund et al., (2002). |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142209, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272234 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cypermethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.3 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.3 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cypermethrin from Maund et al., (2002). |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142209, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272286 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cypermethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.3 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.3 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cypermethrin from Maund et al., (2002). |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142209, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272114 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cypermethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.3 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.3 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cypermethrin from Maund et al., (2002). |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142209, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
283574 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cypermethrin. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for cypermethrin is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of cypermethrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Cypermethrin |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-08 and 2018-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142209, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272172 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cypermethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.3 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.3 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cypermethrin from Maund et al., (2002). |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142209, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
283572 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cypermethrin. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for cypermethrin is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of cypermethrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Cypermethrin |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-08 and 2018-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142209, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272192 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cypermethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.3 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.3 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cypermethrin from Maund et al., (2002). |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142209, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272132 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cypermethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.3 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.3 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cypermethrin from Maund et al., (2002). |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142209, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272032 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cypermethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.3 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.3 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cypermethrin from Maund et al., (2002). |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142209, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272087 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cypermethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.3 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.3 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cypermethrin from Maund et al., (2002). |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142209, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272128 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cypermethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.3 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.3 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cypermethrin from Maund et al., (2002). |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142209, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271724 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cypermethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.3 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.3 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cypermethrin from Maund et al., (2002). |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142209, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272168 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cypermethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.3 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.3 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cypermethrin from Maund et al., (2002). |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142209, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272072 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cypermethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.3 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.3 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cypermethrin from Maund et al., (2002). |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142209, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
271957 |
|
Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for cypermethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.3 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.3 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for cypermethrin from Maund et al., (2002). |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142212, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272510 |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.79 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.79 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for deltamethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142212, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272436 |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.79 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.79 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for deltamethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142212, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272473 |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.79 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.79 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for deltamethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142212, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272652 |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.79 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.79 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for deltamethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142212, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
283561 |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.000026 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic). |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-01-08 to 2018-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142212, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272537 |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.79 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.79 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for deltamethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142212, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272654 |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.79 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.79 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for deltamethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142212, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272454 |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.79 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.79 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for deltamethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142212, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272615 |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.79 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.79 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for deltamethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142212, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272555 |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.79 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.79 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for deltamethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142212, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272619 |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.79 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.79 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for deltamethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142212, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272595 |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.79 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.79 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for deltamethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142212, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272338 |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.79 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.79 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for deltamethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142212, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272430 |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.79 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.79 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for deltamethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142212, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
283559 |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.000026 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic). |
Guideline Reference: |
OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-01-08 to 2018-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142212, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272514 |
|
Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 0.79 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 0.79 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for deltamethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142215, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
273242 |
|
Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.5 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.5 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142215, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
272698 |
|
Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.5 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.5 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142215, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
273075 |
|
Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.5 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.5 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142215, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
273094 |
|
Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.5 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.5 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142215, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
273096 |
|
Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.5 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.5 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142215, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
273051 |
|
Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.5 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.5 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142215, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
283479 |
|
Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Esfenvalerate. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for esfenvalerate is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of esfenvalerate were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Esfenvalerate |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-08 and 2018-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142215, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
283495 |
|
Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Esfenvalerate. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for esfenvalerate is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of esfenvalerate were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Esfenvalerate |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-08 and 2018-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142215, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
273217 |
|
Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.5 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.5 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142215, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
273076 |
|
Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.5 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.5 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142215, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
273072 |
|
Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.5 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.5 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142215, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
273265 |
|
Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.5 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.5 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142215, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
273128 |
|
Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.5 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.5 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142215, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
273262 |
|
Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.5 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.5 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142215, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
273167 |
|
Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.5 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.5 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142215, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
273256 |
|
Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.5 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 1.5 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for esfenvalerate/fenvalerate (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268715 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Chironomus dilutus for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Chironomus dilutus for Survival on 2016-07-11. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-11 and 2016-07-11. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268801 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Chironomus dilutus for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Chironomus dilutus for Survival on 2016-07-11. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-11 and 2016-07-11. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268721 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Hyalella azteca for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205R01411 ( San Thomas Aquino at Mission College ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-07-07 and 2015-07-07. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268671 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Hyalella azteca for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205R01706 ( Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-07-07 and 2015-07-07. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268752 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-07-17 and 2018-07-17. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
274977 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Nickel . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for nickel is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 48.6 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268901 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 2 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Chironomus dilutus for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Chironomus dilutus for Survival on 2019-07-23. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-07-23 and 2019-08-28. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268895 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Chironomus dilutus for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-07-22 and 2020-07-22. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268722 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Hyalella azteca for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205R01411 ( San Thomas Aquino at Mission College ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-07-07 and 2015-07-07. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268656 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Hyalella azteca for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205R01706 ( Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-07-07 and 2015-07-07. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268717 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-07-13 and 2017-07-13. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268917 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 2 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Chironomus dilutus for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Chironomus dilutus for Survival on 2019-07-23. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-07-23 and 2019-08-28. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268780 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-07-13 and 2017-07-13. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268800 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-07-17 and 2018-07-17. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
274742 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Nickel . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for nickel is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 48.6 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
274829 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Nickel . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for nickel is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 48.6 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
274850 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Nickel . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for nickel is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 48.6 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
274976 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Nickel . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for nickel is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 48.6 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
274866 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Nickel . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for nickel is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 48.6 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
274782 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Nickel . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for nickel is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 48.6 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
274805 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Nickel . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for nickel is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 48.6 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
274721 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Nickel . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for nickel is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 48.6 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
274730 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Nickel . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for nickel is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 48.6 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
274708 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Nickel . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for nickel is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 48.6 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275099 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Nickel . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for nickel is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 48.6 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
274892 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Nickel . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for nickel is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 48.6 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268825 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Chironomus dilutus for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-07-22 and 2020-07-22. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142197, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
274851 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nickel |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Nickel . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for nickel is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 48.6 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285492 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-28 and 2015-04-28 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286665 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00067 (San Thomas Aquino - 300 m downstream Central Expy-205R00067). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-03 and 2012-06-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286623 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04670 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 Congress Springs Ln). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-09 and 2019-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286433 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04479 (Saratoga Creek u/s Warburton Ave). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-12 and 2019-06-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286437 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00355 (Saratoga Creek - 200 m downstream Lawrence Exp-205R00355). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-13 and 2012-06-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285965 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00746 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Pierce Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-24 and 2018-05-24 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285972 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01091 (Saratoga Creek at Bowers Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285883 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03498 (Saratoga Creek upstream 4th Street). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285768 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205SAR075 (Saratoga Creek at Wildwood Park-205SAR075). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-07-27 and 2017-07-27 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286278 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02474 (Wildwood Park in Saratoga). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-18 and 2016-05-18 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286279 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02730 (Upstream Cox). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-01 and 2016-06-01 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286256 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01091 (Saratoga Creek at Bowers Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286262 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00170 (Saratoga Creek at Saratoga Springs Resort-205R00170). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-29 and 2013-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285516 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02730 (Upstream Cox). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-01 and 2016-06-01 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286643 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04591 (San Thomas Aquino Creek between Agnew Rd and Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-07 and 2019-05-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285804 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04591 (San Thomas Aquino Creek between Agnew Rd and Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-07 and 2019-05-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286572 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04670 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 Congress Springs Ln). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-09 and 2019-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285605 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03619 (Saratoga Creek at Murdoch Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-08 and 2018-05-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285582 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02474 (Wildwood Park in Saratoga). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-18 and 2016-05-18 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286463 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03498 (Saratoga Creek upstream 4th Street). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286361 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00058 (Saratoga Creek - 300 m downstream Booker Cr confluence-205R00058). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-05-15 and 2012-05-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286255 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00170 (Saratoga Creek at Saratoga Springs Resort-205R00170). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-29 and 2013-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
93239 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
4 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staffassessed SWAMP data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
RWB2 Urbanization Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Saratoga Creek was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ Saratoga near Hakone Gardens - 205SAR080, Saratoga inside SCVWD gate - below Walnut Ave - 205SAR070, Saratoga behind Lutheran school - Saratoga Ave and Braemar - 205SAR060, Saratoga above Congress Springs Park - 205SAR057] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/21/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
93238 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
4 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staffassessed SWAMP data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
RWB2 Urbanization Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Saratoga Creek was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ Saratoga near Hakone Gardens - 205SAR080, Saratoga inside SCVWD gate - below Walnut Ave - 205SAR070, Saratoga behind Lutheran school - Saratoga Ave and Braemar - 205SAR060, Saratoga above Congress Springs Park - 205SAR057] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/21/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285684 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03619 (Saratoga Creek at Murdoch Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-08 and 2018-05-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286329 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04479 (Saratoga Creek u/s Warburton Ave). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-12 and 2019-06-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285191 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03843 (San Tomas Aquino Creek upstream Highway 101). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-29 and 2018-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285660 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03306 (Saratoga Creek upstream via Real). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-05-09 and 2017-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285676 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285584 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205SAR075 (Saratoga Creek at Wildwood Park-205SAR075). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-07-27 and 2017-07-27 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285586 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03562 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Tollgate Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285190 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-21 and 2018-05-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286298 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00355 (Saratoga Creek - 200 m downstream Lawrence Exp-205R00355). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-13 and 2012-06-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285571 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03843 (San Tomas Aquino Creek upstream Highway 101). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-29 and 2018-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285585 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03306 (Saratoga Creek upstream via Real). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-05-09 and 2017-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285609 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-21 and 2018-05-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285658 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-28 and 2015-04-28 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285673 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00067 (San Thomas Aquino - 300 m downstream Central Expy-205R00067). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-03 and 2012-06-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285192 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03562 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Tollgate Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285521 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00746 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Pierce Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-24 and 2018-05-24 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
285657 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142198, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286254 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00058 (Saratoga Creek - 300 m downstream Booker Cr confluence-205R00058). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-05-15 and 2012-05-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142218, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275442 |
|
Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for permethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 8.9 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 8.9 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for permethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142218, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275532 |
|
Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for permethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 8.9 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 8.9 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for permethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142218, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275278 |
|
Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for permethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 8.9 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 8.9 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for permethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142218, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275515 |
|
Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for permethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 8.9 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 8.9 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for permethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142218, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275261 |
|
Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for permethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 8.9 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 8.9 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for permethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142218, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275238 |
|
Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for permethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 8.9 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 8.9 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for permethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142218, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275235 |
|
Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for permethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 8.9 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 8.9 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for permethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142218, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275377 |
|
Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for permethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 8.9 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 8.9 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for permethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142218, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275341 |
|
Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for permethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 8.9 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 8.9 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for permethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142218, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275414 |
|
Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for permethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 8.9 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 8.9 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for permethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142218, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275276 |
|
Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for permethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 8.9 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 8.9 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for permethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142218, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286400 |
|
Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Permethrin. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for permethrin is 1 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of permethrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Permethrin |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-08 and 2018-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142218, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275258 |
|
Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for permethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 8.9 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 8.9 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for permethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142218, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275394 |
|
Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for permethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 8.9 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 8.9 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for permethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142218, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275401 |
|
Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin, Total . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for permethrin is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 8.9 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample. The LC50 8.9 ug/g is the geometric mean of LC50 values for permethrin (Amweg et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142218, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286398 |
|
Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Permethrin. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for permethrin is 1 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of permethrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Permethrin |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-08 and 2018-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142205, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275989 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142205, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275967 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142205, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275931 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142205, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
276006 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142205, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275763 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142205, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275823 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2020-07-22 to 2020-07-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142205, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287682 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The summed ratios of the pyrethroid pesticides bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, esfenvalerate, lambda-cyhalothrin, permethrin and their respective chronic concentration goals are not to exceed 1. If the freely dissolved concentrations of these pesticides were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-01-08 to 2018-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142205, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275951 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142205, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275968 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-07-11 to 2016-07-11 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142205, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
276024 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142205, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
276009 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-07-13 to 2017-07-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142205, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
276008 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142205, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275804 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2015-07-07 to 2015-07-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142205, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
275727 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2019-07-23 to 2019-07-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142205, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287661 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Pyrethroids. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The summed ratios of the pyrethroid pesticides bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, esfenvalerate, lambda-cyhalothrin, permethrin and their respective chronic concentration goals are not to exceed 1. If the freely dissolved concentrations of these pesticides were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-08 and 2018-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142205, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
276005 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from pyrethroids is one toxic unit. Individual pyrethroid concentrations in sediment were normalized to organic carbon content, divided by the respective LC50 and then summed. A sum over over one toxic unit is an exceedance of the evaluation guideline (Amweg et al. 2006). |
Guideline Reference: |
Use and Toxicity of Pyrethroid Pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24:966-972, with erratum 24:No. 5 |
Guideline Reference: |
Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:9-15 |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Pesticides to Chironomus dilutus and Hyalella azteca. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61:83¿92. |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
Guideline Reference: |
Compilation of freshwater OC-normalized sediment toxicity data for pyrethroids |
Guideline Reference: |
Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks from California and Tennessee. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(5): 1700-1706 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-07-17 to 2018-07-17 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142205, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287535 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Pyrethroids. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The summed ratios of the pyrethroid pesticides bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, esfenvalerate, lambda-cyhalothrin, permethrin and their respective chronic concentration goals are not to exceed 1. If the freely dissolved concentrations of these pesticides were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-08 and 2018-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142205, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287662 |
|
Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The summed ratios of the pyrethroid pesticides bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, esfenvalerate, lambda-cyhalothrin, permethrin and their respective chronic concentration goals are not to exceed 1. If the freely dissolved concentrations of these pesticides were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
Guideline Reference: |
Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-01-08 to 2018-01-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145374, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
93249 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
4 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staffassessed SWAMP data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for Conductivity(Us). |
Data Reference: |
RWB2 Urbanization Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL for Specific Conductance is 900 us/cm (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Region). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels and Compliance. CCR Title 22 section 64449. |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Saratoga Creek was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ Saratoga near Hakone Gardens - 205SAR080, Saratoga inside SCVWD gate - below Walnut Ave - 205SAR070, Saratoga behind Lutheran school - Saratoga Ave and Braemar - 205SAR060, Saratoga above Congress Springs Park - 205SAR057] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/21/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145374, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288162 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as municipal supply (MUN) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The water quality objective for specific conductivity is 3000 uS/cm. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03562 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Tollgate Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145374, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287817 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as municipal supply (MUN) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The water quality objective for specific conductivity is 3000 uS/cm. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205SAR075 (Saratoga Creek at Wildwood Park-205SAR075). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-07-27 and 2017-07-27 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145374, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288336 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as municipal supply (MUN) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The water quality objective for specific conductivity is 3000 uS/cm. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02474 (Wildwood Park in Saratoga). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-18 and 2016-05-18 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145374, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288068 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as municipal supply (MUN) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The water quality objective for specific conductivity is 3000 uS/cm. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00355 (Saratoga Creek - 200 m downstream Lawrence Exp-205R00355). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-13 and 2012-06-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145374, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288319 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as municipal supply (MUN) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The water quality objective for specific conductivity is 3000 uS/cm. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-21 and 2018-05-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145374, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288337 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as municipal supply (MUN) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The water quality objective for specific conductivity is 3000 uS/cm. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02730 (Upstream Cox). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-01 and 2016-06-01 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145374, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287964 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as municipal supply (MUN) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The water quality objective for specific conductivity is 3000 uS/cm. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04591 (San Thomas Aquino Creek between Agnew Rd and Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-07 and 2019-05-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145374, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288434 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as municipal supply (MUN) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The water quality objective for specific conductivity is 3000 uS/cm. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-28 and 2015-04-28 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145374, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288172 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as municipal supply (MUN) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The water quality objective for specific conductivity is 3000 uS/cm. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03498 (Saratoga Creek upstream 4th Street). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145374, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288069 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as municipal supply (MUN) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The water quality objective for specific conductivity is 3000 uS/cm. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00170 (Saratoga Creek at Saratoga Springs Resort-205R00170). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-29 and 2013-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145374, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288342 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as municipal supply (MUN) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The water quality objective for specific conductivity is 3000 uS/cm. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145374, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288379 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as municipal supply (MUN) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The water quality objective for specific conductivity is 3000 uS/cm. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01091 (Saratoga Creek at Bowers Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145374, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287916 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as municipal supply (MUN) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The water quality objective for specific conductivity is 3000 uS/cm. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04479 (Saratoga Creek u/s Warburton Ave). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-12 and 2019-06-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145374, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288048 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as municipal supply (MUN) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The water quality objective for specific conductivity is 3000 uS/cm. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03306 (Saratoga Creek upstream via Real). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-05-09 and 2017-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145374, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287983 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as municipal supply (MUN) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The water quality objective for specific conductivity is 3000 uS/cm. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04670 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 Congress Springs Ln). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-09 and 2019-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145374, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288269 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as municipal supply (MUN) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The water quality objective for specific conductivity is 3000 uS/cm. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00746 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Pierce Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-24 and 2018-05-24 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145374, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288376 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as municipal supply (MUN) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The water quality objective for specific conductivity is 3000 uS/cm. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03843 (San Tomas Aquino Creek upstream Highway 101). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-29 and 2018-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 145374, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287816 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as municipal supply (MUN) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The water quality objective for specific conductivity is 3000 uS/cm. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03619 (Saratoga Creek at Murdoch Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-08 and 2018-05-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142202, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288450 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142202, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
93250 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
4 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staffassessed SWAMP data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for Water Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
RWB2 Urbanization Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Saratoga Creek was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ Saratoga near Hakone Gardens - 205SAR080, Saratoga inside SCVWD gate - below Walnut Ave - 205SAR070, Saratoga behind Lutheran school - Saratoga Ave and Braemar - 205SAR060, Saratoga above Congress Springs Park - 205SAR057] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/21/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142202, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
289093 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205SAR075 (Saratoga Creek at Wildwood Park-205SAR075). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-07-27 and 2017-07-27 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142202, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288828 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02474 (Wildwood Park in Saratoga). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-18 and 2016-05-18 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142202, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288904 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01091 (Saratoga Creek at Bowers Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142202, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
289196 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00746 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Pierce Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-24 and 2018-05-24 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142202, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288857 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03843 (San Tomas Aquino Creek upstream Highway 101). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-29 and 2018-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142202, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288893 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00170 (Saratoga Creek at Saratoga Springs Resort-205R00170). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-29 and 2013-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142202, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288258 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00067 (San Thomas Aquino - 300 m downstream Central Expy-205R00067). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-03 and 2012-06-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142202, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288182 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00058 (Saratoga Creek - 300 m downstream Booker Cr confluence-205R00058). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-05-15 and 2012-05-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142202, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288586 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-28 and 2015-04-28 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142202, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288868 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-21 and 2018-05-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142202, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288789 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04479 (Saratoga Creek u/s Warburton Ave). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-12 and 2019-06-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142202, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288896 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02730 (Upstream Cox). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-01 and 2016-06-01 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142202, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
289211 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03498 (Saratoga Creek upstream 4th Street). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142202, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288791 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04670 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 Congress Springs Ln). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-09 and 2019-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142202, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288843 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03562 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Tollgate Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142202, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288554 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00355 (Saratoga Creek - 200 m downstream Lawrence Exp-205R00355). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-13 and 2012-06-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142202, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288471 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04591 (San Thomas Aquino Creek between Agnew Rd and Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-07 and 2019-05-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142202, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
288714 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03619 (Saratoga Creek at Murdoch Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-08 and 2018-05-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142202, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
289077 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03306 (Saratoga Creek upstream via Real). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-05-09 and 2017-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287698 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-28 and 2015-04-28 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287693 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205SAR075 (Saratoga Creek at Wildwood Park-205SAR075). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-07-27 and 2017-07-27 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287585 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03498 (Saratoga Creek upstream 4th Street). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287110 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-21 and 2018-05-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287147 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00067 (San Thomas Aquino - 300 m downstream Central Expy-205R00067). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-03 and 2012-06-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287052 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for pH ranges from 4.5-9.0. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00058 (Saratoga Creek - 300 m downstream Booker Cr confluence-205R00058). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-05-15 and 2012-05-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287387 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for pH ranges from 4.5-9.0. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02474 (Wildwood Park in Saratoga). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-18 and 2016-05-18 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287335 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for pH ranges from 4.5-9.0. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-21 and 2018-05-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287189 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for pH ranges from 4.5-9.0. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03498 (Saratoga Creek upstream 4th Street). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287389 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for pH ranges from 4.5-9.0. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205SAR075 (Saratoga Creek at Wildwood Park-205SAR075). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-07-27 and 2017-07-27 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287201 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for pH ranges from 4.5-9.0. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287438 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01091 (Saratoga Creek at Bowers Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287545 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00746 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Pierce Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-24 and 2018-05-24 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287361 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00170 (Saratoga Creek at Saratoga Springs Resort-205R00170). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-29 and 2013-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287587 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04670 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 Congress Springs Ln). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-09 and 2019-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287106 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for pH ranges from 4.5-9.0. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03306 (Saratoga Creek upstream via Real). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-05-09 and 2017-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287032 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for pH ranges from 4.5-9.0. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00170 (Saratoga Creek at Saratoga Springs Resort-205R00170). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-29 and 2013-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287678 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04591 (San Thomas Aquino Creek between Agnew Rd and Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-07 and 2019-05-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287053 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for pH ranges from 4.5-9.0. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01091 (Saratoga Creek at Bowers Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286956 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for pH ranges from 4.5-9.0. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03619 (Saratoga Creek at Murdoch Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-08 and 2018-05-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287613 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287714 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03843 (San Tomas Aquino Creek upstream Highway 101). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-29 and 2018-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287631 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for pH ranges from 4.5-9.0. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04479 (Saratoga Creek u/s Warburton Ave). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-12 and 2019-06-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287735 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04479 (Saratoga Creek u/s Warburton Ave). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-12 and 2019-06-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287504 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03306 (Saratoga Creek upstream via Real). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-05-09 and 2017-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
93241 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
4 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staffassessed SWAMP data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
RWB2 Urbanization Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for pH ranges from 4.5-9.0. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Saratoga Creek was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ Saratoga near Hakone Gardens - 205SAR080, Saratoga inside SCVWD gate - below Walnut Ave - 205SAR070, Saratoga behind Lutheran school - Saratoga Ave and Braemar - 205SAR060, Saratoga above Congress Springs Park - 205SAR057] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/21/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
93247 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
4 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
State Water Board staffassessed SWAMP data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
RWB2 Urbanization Study 2008 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Region’s water quality objective for all surface waters states the following: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Saratoga Creek was collected at 4 monitoring sites [ Saratoga near Hakone Gardens - 205SAR080, Saratoga inside SCVWD gate - below Walnut Ave - 205SAR070, Saratoga behind Lutheran school - Saratoga Ave and Braemar - 205SAR060, Saratoga above Congress Springs Park - 205SAR057] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/21/2008. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
The SWAMP QAPP (2008) was followed. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Program Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287691 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03619 (Saratoga Creek at Murdoch Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-08 and 2018-05-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287543 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00058 (Saratoga Creek - 300 m downstream Booker Cr confluence-205R00058). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-05-15 and 2012-05-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287582 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for pH ranges from 4.5-9.0. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04591 (San Thomas Aquino Creek between Agnew Rd and Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-07 and 2019-05-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
286890 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for pH ranges from 4.5-9.0. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-28 and 2015-04-28 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287394 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for pH ranges from 4.5-9.0. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03843 (San Tomas Aquino Creek upstream Highway 101). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-29 and 2018-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287414 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for pH ranges from 4.5-9.0. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04670 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 Congress Springs Ln). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-09 and 2019-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287435 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00355 (Saratoga Creek - 200 m downstream Lawrence Exp-205R00355). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-13 and 2012-06-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287030 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for pH ranges from 4.5-9.0. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00355 (Saratoga Creek - 200 m downstream Lawrence Exp-205R00355). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-13 and 2012-06-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287312 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for pH ranges from 4.5-9.0. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02730 (Upstream Cox). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-01 and 2016-06-01 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287325 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for pH ranges from 4.5-9.0. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00067 (San Thomas Aquino - 300 m downstream Central Expy-205R00067). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-03 and 2012-06-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287658 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03562 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Tollgate Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287246 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for pH ranges from 4.5-9.0. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03562 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Tollgate Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287776 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02474 (Wildwood Park in Saratoga). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-18 and 2016-05-18 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287107 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.22 Constituents of Concern for Municipal and Agricultural Water Supplies states: At a minimum, surface waters designated for use as agricultural supply (AGR) shall not contain concentrations of constituents in excess of the levels specified in Table 3-6. The limit for pH ranges from 4.5-9.0. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00746 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Pierce Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-24 and 2018-05-24 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142199, pH
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
287796 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02730 (Upstream Cox). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-01 and 2016-06-01 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279722 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02474 (Wildwood Park in Saratoga). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-18 and 2016-05-18 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280263 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01091 (Saratoga Creek at Bowers Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280205 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279672 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02730 (Upstream Cox). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-01 and 2016-06-01 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280031 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03843 (San Tomas Aquino Creek upstream Highway 101). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-29 and 2018-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280134 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02730 (Upstream Cox). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-01 and 2016-06-01 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277609 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01091 (Saratoga Creek at Bowers Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277914 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00058 (Saratoga Creek - 300 m downstream Booker Cr confluence-205R00058). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-05-15 and 2012-05-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278529 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03498 (Saratoga Creek upstream 4th Street). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278130 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04479 (Saratoga Creek u/s Warburton Ave). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-12 and 2019-06-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278269 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03843 (San Tomas Aquino Creek upstream Highway 101). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-29 and 2018-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278379 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00067 (San Thomas Aquino - 300 m downstream Central Expy-205R00067). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-03 and 2012-06-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279837 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-21 and 2018-05-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279527 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00746 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Pierce Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-24 and 2018-05-24 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279647 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00170 (Saratoga Creek at Saratoga Springs Resort-205R00170). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-29 and 2013-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280223 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03306 (Saratoga Creek upstream via Real). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-05-09 and 2017-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279915 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03306 (Saratoga Creek upstream via Real). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-05-09 and 2017-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279500 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04591 (San Thomas Aquino Creek between Agnew Rd and Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-07 and 2019-05-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279842 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00746 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Pierce Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-24 and 2018-05-24 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280114 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00058 (Saratoga Creek - 300 m downstream Booker Cr confluence-205R00058). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-05-15 and 2012-05-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279481 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00058 (Saratoga Creek - 300 m downstream Booker Cr confluence-205R00058). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-05-15 and 2012-05-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280163 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-28 and 2015-04-28 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279627 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00355 (Saratoga Creek - 200 m downstream Lawrence Exp-205R00355). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-13 and 2012-06-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279528 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03619 (Saratoga Creek at Murdoch Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-08 and 2018-05-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279671 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-28 and 2015-04-28 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280221 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03562 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Tollgate Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279905 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02474 (Wildwood Park in Saratoga). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-18 and 2016-05-18 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279914 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03498 (Saratoga Creek upstream 4th Street). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280024 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03619 (Saratoga Creek at Murdoch Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-08 and 2018-05-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280229 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04479 (Saratoga Creek u/s Warburton Ave). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-12 and 2019-06-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280025 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03498 (Saratoga Creek upstream 4th Street). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280053 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279768 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03562 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Tollgate Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280228 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04591 (San Thomas Aquino Creek between Agnew Rd and Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-07 and 2019-05-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280262 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00170 (Saratoga Creek at Saratoga Springs Resort-205R00170). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-29 and 2013-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277792 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-28 and 2015-04-28 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278091 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03306 (Saratoga Creek upstream via Real). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-05-09 and 2017-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278000 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00067 (San Thomas Aquino - 300 m downstream Central Expy-205R00067). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-03 and 2012-06-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278160 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04479 (Saratoga Creek u/s Warburton Ave). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-12 and 2019-06-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278465 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01091 (Saratoga Creek at Bowers Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277773 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00170 (Saratoga Creek at Saratoga Springs Resort-205R00170). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-29 and 2013-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278309 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04670 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 Congress Springs Ln). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-09 and 2019-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278111 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03619 (Saratoga Creek at Murdoch Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-08 and 2018-05-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278523 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03306 (Saratoga Creek upstream via Real). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-05-09 and 2017-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278724 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02730 (Upstream Cox). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-01 and 2016-06-01 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278050 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00355 (Saratoga Creek - 200 m downstream Lawrence Exp-205R00355). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-13 and 2012-06-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278132 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00058 (Saratoga Creek - 300 m downstream Booker Cr confluence-205R00058). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-05-15 and 2012-05-15 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277791 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04670 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 Congress Springs Ln). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-09 and 2019-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278404 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02474 (Wildwood Park in Saratoga). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-18 and 2016-05-18 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278782 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03562 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Tollgate Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277767 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03562 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Tollgate Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278089 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02730 (Upstream Cox). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-01 and 2016-06-01 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278220 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04591 (San Thomas Aquino Creek between Agnew Rd and Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-07 and 2019-05-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278756 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00746 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Pierce Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-24 and 2018-05-24 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277661 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03498 (Saratoga Creek upstream 4th Street). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-23 and 2018-05-23 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278783 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01706 (Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-28 and 2015-04-28 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278616 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03619 (Saratoga Creek at Murdoch Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-08 and 2018-05-08 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278219 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00746 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 and Pierce Rd). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-24 and 2018-05-24 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277747 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278161 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04591 (San Thomas Aquino Creek between Agnew Rd and Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-07 and 2019-05-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278470 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2013 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00170 (Saratoga Creek at Saratoga Springs Resort-205R00170). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-29 and 2013-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278680 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-21 and 2018-05-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278697 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R02474 (Wildwood Park in Saratoga). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-18 and 2016-05-18 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278798 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03843 (San Tomas Aquino Creek upstream Highway 101). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-29 and 2018-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278133 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00355 (Saratoga Creek - 200 m downstream Lawrence Exp-205R00355). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-13 and 2012-06-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
278590 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01411 (San Thomas Aquino at Mission College). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-05-19 and 2015-05-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
277679 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-21 and 2018-05-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279712 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04479 (Saratoga Creek u/s Warburton Ave). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-12 and 2019-06-12 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279732 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04670 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 Congress Springs Ln). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-09 and 2019-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280246 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R04670 (Saratoga Creek at Highway 9 Congress Springs Ln). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-09 and 2019-05-09 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280115 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2014 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R01091 (Saratoga Creek at Bowers Park). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-05 and 2014-05-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279907 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205STQ010 (San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-21 and 2018-05-21 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280140 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00067 (San Thomas Aquino - 300 m downstream Central Expy-205R00067). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-03 and 2012-06-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279529 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R03843 (San Tomas Aquino Creek upstream Highway 101). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-05-29 and 2018-05-29 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
279901 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00067 (San Thomas Aquino - 300 m downstream Central Expy-205R00067). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-03 and 2012-06-03 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151014, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
280006 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2012 data for Saratoga Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 205R00355 (Saratoga Creek - 200 m downstream Lawrence Exp-205R00355). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-06-13 and 2012-06-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2012. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268800 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-07-17 and 2018-07-17. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268895 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Chironomus dilutus for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-07-22 and 2020-07-22. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268766 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Chironomus dilutus for Survival on 2017-07-13. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-07-13 and 2017-07-13. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268714 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 2 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Survival, Pimephales promelas for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Ceriodaphnia dubia for Survival, Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female, Selenastrum capricornutum for Total Cell Count. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205R01411 ( San Thomas Aquino at Mission College ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-06 and 2015-07-07. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268885 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
TST |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. All samples met the requirements of the State Policy for Water Quality Control: Toxicity Provisions. This includes utilizing the Test of Significant Toxicity (TST) and using toxicity testing methods provided in the Provisions to assess water column toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Selenastrum capricornutum for Total Cell Count, Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female on 2019-07-23. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Attainment of the water quality objective is demonstrated by conducting aquatic toxicity testing, analyzing the data using the TST statistical approach, and rejecting the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is toxic because the response (e.g., survival, reproduction, growth) of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is less than or equal to 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. The alternative hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is not toxic because the of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is greater than 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity Provisions to the Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-07-23 and 2019-07-23. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268796 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
TST |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. All samples met the requirements of the State Policy for Water Quality Control: Toxicity Provisions. This includes utilizing the Test of Significant Toxicity (TST) and using toxicity testing methods provided in the Provisions to assess water column toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female, Hyalella azteca for Survival, Pimephales promelas for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Selenastrum capricornutum for Total Cell Count. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female on 2017-07-13. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Attainment of the water quality objective is demonstrated by conducting aquatic toxicity testing, analyzing the data using the TST statistical approach, and rejecting the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is toxic because the response (e.g., survival, reproduction, growth) of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is less than or equal to 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. The alternative hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is not toxic because the of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is greater than 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity Provisions to the Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-07-13 and 2017-07-13. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268901 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 2 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Chironomus dilutus for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Chironomus dilutus for Survival on 2019-07-23. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-07-23 and 2019-08-28. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268879 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Chironomus dilutus for Survival on 2020-07-22. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-07-22 and 2020-07-22. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268713 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 2 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Survival, Pimephales promelas for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Ceriodaphnia dubia for Survival, Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female, Selenastrum capricornutum for Total Cell Count. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205R01411 ( San Thomas Aquino at Mission College ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-06 and 2015-07-07. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268810 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
TST |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. All samples met the requirements of the State Policy for Water Quality Control: Toxicity Provisions. This includes utilizing the Test of Significant Toxicity (TST) and using toxicity testing methods provided in the Provisions to assess water column toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female, Selenastrum capricornutum for Total Cell Count. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Attainment of the water quality objective is demonstrated by conducting aquatic toxicity testing, analyzing the data using the TST statistical approach, and rejecting the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is toxic because the response (e.g., survival, reproduction, growth) of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is less than or equal to 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. The alternative hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is not toxic because the of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is greater than 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity Provisions to the Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-11 and 2016-07-11. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268918 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-07-23 and 2019-07-23. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268793 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Chironomus dilutus for Survival, Pimephales promelas for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-11 and 2016-07-11. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268788 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
TST |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. All samples met the requirements of the State Policy for Water Quality Control: Toxicity Provisions. This includes utilizing the Test of Significant Toxicity (TST) and using toxicity testing methods provided in the Provisions to assess water column toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female, Hyalella azteca for Survival, Pimephales promelas for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Selenastrum capricornutum for Total Cell Count. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female on 2017-07-13. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Attainment of the water quality objective is demonstrated by conducting aquatic toxicity testing, analyzing the data using the TST statistical approach, and rejecting the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is toxic because the response (e.g., survival, reproduction, growth) of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is less than or equal to 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. The alternative hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is not toxic because the of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is greater than 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity Provisions to the Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-07-13 and 2017-07-13. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268656 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Hyalella azteca for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205R01706 ( Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-07-07 and 2015-07-07. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268722 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Hyalella azteca for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205R01411 ( San Thomas Aquino at Mission College ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-07-07 and 2015-07-07. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268780 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-07-13 and 2017-07-13. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268792 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 2 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-08 and 2018-07-17. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268902 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
TST |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. All samples met the requirements of the State Policy for Water Quality Control: Toxicity Provisions. This includes utilizing the Test of Significant Toxicity (TST) and using toxicity testing methods provided in the Provisions to assess water column toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Selenastrum capricornutum for Total Cell Count, Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female on 2019-07-23. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Attainment of the water quality objective is demonstrated by conducting aquatic toxicity testing, analyzing the data using the TST statistical approach, and rejecting the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is toxic because the response (e.g., survival, reproduction, growth) of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is less than or equal to 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. The alternative hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is not toxic because the of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is greater than 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity Provisions to the Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-07-23 and 2019-07-23. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268801 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Chironomus dilutus for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Chironomus dilutus for Survival on 2016-07-11. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-11 and 2016-07-11. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268717 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-07-13 and 2017-07-13. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268863 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-07-23 and 2019-07-23. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268880 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
TST |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 2 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. All samples met the requirements of the State Policy for Water Quality Control: Toxicity Provisions. This includes utilizing the Test of Significant Toxicity (TST) and using toxicity testing methods provided in the Provisions to assess water column toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female, Pimephales promelas for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Hyalella azteca for Survival, Selenastrum capricornutum for Total Cell Count. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female on 2020-07-22. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Attainment of the water quality objective is demonstrated by conducting aquatic toxicity testing, analyzing the data using the TST statistical approach, and rejecting the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is toxic because the response (e.g., survival, reproduction, growth) of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is less than or equal to 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. The alternative hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is not toxic because the of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is greater than 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity Provisions to the Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-07-22 and 2020-09-09. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268799 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
TST |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 2 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. All samples met the requirements of the State Policy for Water Quality Control: Toxicity Provisions. This includes utilizing the Test of Significant Toxicity (TST) and using toxicity testing methods provided in the Provisions to assess water column toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Selenastrum capricornutum for Total Cell Count, Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female, Pimephales promelas for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Hyalella azteca for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Attainment of the water quality objective is demonstrated by conducting aquatic toxicity testing, analyzing the data using the TST statistical approach, and rejecting the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is toxic because the response (e.g., survival, reproduction, growth) of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is less than or equal to 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. The alternative hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is not toxic because the of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is greater than 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity Provisions to the Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-08 and 2018-07-17. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268777 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
TST |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. All samples met the requirements of the State Policy for Water Quality Control: Toxicity Provisions. This includes utilizing the Test of Significant Toxicity (TST) and using toxicity testing methods provided in the Provisions to assess water column toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female, Selenastrum capricornutum for Total Cell Count. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Attainment of the water quality objective is demonstrated by conducting aquatic toxicity testing, analyzing the data using the TST statistical approach, and rejecting the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is toxic because the response (e.g., survival, reproduction, growth) of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is less than or equal to 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. The alternative hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is not toxic because the of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is greater than 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity Provisions to the Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-11 and 2016-07-11. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268917 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 2 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2019 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Chironomus dilutus for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Chironomus dilutus for Survival on 2019-07-23. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-07-23 and 2019-08-28. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268825 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Chironomus dilutus for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-07-22 and 2020-07-22. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268715 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Chironomus dilutus for Survival, Hyalella azteca for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Chironomus dilutus for Survival on 2016-07-11. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-11 and 2016-07-11. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268781 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2017 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Chironomus dilutus for Survival on 2017-07-13. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-07-13 and 2017-07-13. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc., Applied Marine Sciences, Armand Ruby Consulting . 2016. BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268887 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
TST |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 2 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. All samples met the requirements of the State Policy for Water Quality Control: Toxicity Provisions. This includes utilizing the Test of Significant Toxicity (TST) and using toxicity testing methods provided in the Provisions to assess water column toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female, Pimephales promelas for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Hyalella azteca for Survival, Selenastrum capricornutum for Total Cell Count. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female on 2020-07-22. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Attainment of the water quality objective is demonstrated by conducting aquatic toxicity testing, analyzing the data using the TST statistical approach, and rejecting the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is toxic because the response (e.g., survival, reproduction, growth) of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is less than or equal to 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. The alternative hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is not toxic because the of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is greater than 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity Provisions to the Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-07-22 and 2020-09-09. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268721 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Hyalella azteca for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205R01411 ( San Thomas Aquino at Mission College ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-07-07 and 2015-07-07. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268784 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 2 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-08 and 2018-07-17. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268729 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 2 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Hyalella azteca for Survival, Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female, Pimephales promelas for Survival, Selenastrum capricornutum for Total Cell Count, Ceriodaphnia dubia for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2015-02-06. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205R01706 ( Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-06 and 2015-07-07. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268927 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2020 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Chironomus dilutus for Survival on 2020-07-22. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-07-22 and 2020-07-22. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2000. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268730 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 2 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Hyalella azteca for Survival, Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female, Pimephales promelas for Survival, Selenastrum capricornutum for Total Cell Count, Ceriodaphnia dubia for Survival. The following tests exhibited toxicity: Hyalella azteca for Survival on 2015-02-06. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205R01706 ( Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-06 and 2015-07-07. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268716 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2016 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Chironomus dilutus for Survival, Pimephales promelas for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-11 and 2016-07-11. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2016. Creek Status and Pesticides & Toxicity Monitoring Quality Assurance Project. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268816 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
TST |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 2 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. All samples met the requirements of the State Policy for Water Quality Control: Toxicity Provisions. This includes utilizing the Test of Significant Toxicity (TST) and using toxicity testing methods provided in the Provisions to assess water column toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Selenastrum capricornutum for Total Cell Count, Ceriodaphnia dubia for Young/female, Pimephales promelas for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Hyalella azteca for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Attainment of the water quality objective is demonstrated by conducting aquatic toxicity testing, analyzing the data using the TST statistical approach, and rejecting the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is toxic because the response (e.g., survival, reproduction, growth) of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is less than or equal to 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. The alternative hypothesis is the following general statement: the ambient water is not toxic because the of the test organisms in the ambient water sample is greater than 75 percent (chronic) or 80 percent (acute) of the test organisms’ response in the control water sample. |
Guideline Reference: |
Toxicity Provisions to the Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-08 and 2018-07-17. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268752 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2018 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Survival, Chironomus dilutus for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205STQ010 ( San Tomas Aquino 250m u/s Mission College Boulevard ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-07-17 and 2018-07-17. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142203, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Saratoga Creek |
|
|
LOE ID: |
268671 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by BASMAA RMC Monitoring in WY2015 for Saratoga Creek exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Hyalella azteca for Survival. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 205R01706 ( Saratoga Creek at Oak Hollow ). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-07-07 and 2015-07-07. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
EOA, Inc.. 2014. Creek Status Monitoring Program Quality Assurance Project Plan. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Creek Status Monitoring Program
Quality Assurance Project Plan |
|