Draft California 2024 Integrated Report (303(d) List/305(b) Report)

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2010-12-19 to 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136461, Bifenthrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

257821

Pollutant:

Bifenthrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 27 of the 27 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Bifenthrin. Although a total of 43 samples were collected, 16 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2010-11-09 to 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136461, Bifenthrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

257873

Pollutant:

Bifenthrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2010-12-19 to 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136461, Bifenthrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84126

Pollutant:

Bifenthrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The genus mean acute value for a mysid (Mysidopsis bahia) of 0.00397 ug/L (DFG 00-6, 2000).

Guideline Reference:

Hazard Assessment of the Synthetic Pyrethroid Insecticides Bifenthrin, Cypermethrin, Esfenvalerate, and Permethrin to Aquatic Organisms in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River System. California Department of Fish and Game. Office of Spill Prevention and Response, Administrative Report 00-6

Spatial Representation:

Data for this line of evidence for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 was collected at 1 monitoring site [ Duck Pond/Oxnard Drain #2/Mugu Drain S. of Hueneme Rd. - 01T_ODD2_DCH]

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136461, Bifenthrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310163

Pollutant:

Bifenthrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed ILRP 2007-2009 data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 2 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Bifenthrin. Although a total of 6 samples were collected, 4 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2008-01-05 to 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136461, Bifenthrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

257708

Pollutant:

Bifenthrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 27 of the 27 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Bifenthrin. Although a total of 43 samples were collected, 16 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2010-11-09 to 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136461, Bifenthrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

309955

Pollutant:

Bifenthrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2008-01-05 to 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	136441	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Chlordane
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed with USEPA approved TMDL)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed with USEPA approved TMDL)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	A Source Unknown
TMDL Name:	Calleguas Creek Historic Pesticides (5)
TMDL Project Code:	358
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA:	03/14/2006
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for removal on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 2.2 and sections 4.1 and 4.5 of the Listing Policy. Under sections 4.1 and 4.5 of the Policy, a minimum of one line of evidence is needed to assess listing status. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List. There is sufficient justification to place it in the Being Addressed portion of the CWA 303(d) List because a TMDL has been completed and approved by RWQCB and USEPA, and is expected to result in attainment of the standard. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 0, 0 of 0, 2 of 6, 2 of 6, 10 of 10 and 10 of 10 samples exceeded the criterion for chlordane in water and 2 of 2 samples exceeded the guideline for chlordane in fish tissue and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. The Calleguas Creek Historic Pesticides TMDL was approved by USEPA on 3/14/2006. 5. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136441, Chlordane	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

2028

Pollutant:

Chlordane

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fish tissue analysis

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Two out of 2 samples exceeded. A total of 2 filet composite samples of goldfish and brown bullhead were collected. Goldfish sample was collected in 1993 and brown bullhead was collected in 1994. The guideline was exceeded in both samples. In addition, one whole fish sample of fathead minnow was collected in 1994 and exceeded the guideline (TSMP, 2002).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Los Angeles RWQCB Basin Plan: Toxic pollutants shall not be present at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic life to levels which are harmful to aquatic life or human health.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

OEHHA Screening Value 30 ng/g for chlordane (total).

Guideline Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Spatial Representation:

One station located above culvert in Oxnard Drain #2 at Perimeter Road crossing.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected annually 1993-94.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Toxic Substances Monitoring Program 1992-93 and 1994-95 Data Reports.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136441, Chlordane	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

267813

Pollutant:

Chlordane

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 10 of the 10 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Total Chlordane. Although a total of 43 samples were collected, 33 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The chlordane criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.0043 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2010-11-09 to 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136441, Chlordane	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

267412

Pollutant:

Chlordane

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Total Chlordane. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The chlordane criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.0043 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2010-12-19 to 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136441, Chlordane	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

267795

Pollutant:

Chlordane

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 10 of the 10 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Total Chlordane. Although a total of 43 samples were collected, 33 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The chlordane criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.0043 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2010-11-09 to 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136441, Chlordane	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

267633

Pollutant:

Chlordane

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The chlordane criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.0043 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2010-12-19 to 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136441, Chlordane	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84129

Pollutant:

Chlordane

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Chlordane criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.00059 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136441, Chlordane	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84128

Pollutant:

Chlordane

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Total Chlordane criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.004 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.


DECISION ID	136442	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Chlorpyrifos
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed with USEPA approved TMDL)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	A Source Unknown
TMDL Name:	Calleguas Creek Toxicity (2)
TMDL Project Code:	355
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA:	03/24/2006
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for removal on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 2.2 and section 4.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 4.1 of the Policy, a minimum of one line of evidence is needed to assess listing status. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List. There is sufficient justification to place it in the Being Addressed portion of the CWA 303(d) List because a TMDL has been completed and approved by RWQCB and USEPA, and is expected to result in attainment of the standard. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 2 of 2, 2 of 2, 20 of 43, 5 of 6 and 20 of 43 samples exceeded the criteria and these exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. The TMDL for Toxicity in Calleguas Creek was approved by USEPA on 3/24/2006. 5. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136442, Chlorpyrifos	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

258369

Pollutant:

Chlorpyrifos

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The freshwater criterion continuous concentration to protect aquatic organisms is 0.015 ug/L (Siepmann and Finlayson 2000, with minor corrections to significant figures as described in Beaulaurier et al., 2005).

Guideline Reference:

Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game

Guideline Reference:

Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game (with minor corrections to significant figures as described in Beaulaurier et al., 2005).

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136442, Chlorpyrifos	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

258367

Pollutant:

Chlorpyrifos

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136442, Chlorpyrifos	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

258345

Pollutant:

Chlorpyrifos

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136442, Chlorpyrifos	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84133

Pollutant:

Chlorpyrifos

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

State Water Board staff assessed Agwaiver data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 5 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Chlorpyrifos.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The saltwater criterion continuous concentration to protect aquatic organisms is 0.009 ug/L (Siepmann and Finlayson 2000).

Guideline Reference:

Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136442, Chlorpyrifos	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

258229

Pollutant:

Chlorpyrifos

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.


DECISION ID	149530	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed with USEPA approved TMDL)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed with USEPA approved TMDL)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	A Source Unknown
TMDL Name:	Calleguas Creek Historic Pesticides (5)
TMDL Project Code:	358
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA:	03/14/2006
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for removal from the CWA section 303(d) List under section 4.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 4.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. 3 lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess pollutant. 1 of 1 sample exceeds the criteria. 1 of 1 sample exceeds the criteria. 2 of 2 samples exceed the guideline. 21 of 21 samples exceed the criteria. 2 of 2 samples exceed the criteria. 2 of 6 samples exceed the criteria. 21 of 21 samples exceed the criteria. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 1 of 1, 1 of 1, 21 of 21, 2 of 2, 2of 6, and 21 of 21 samples exceeded the criteria and 2 of 2 samples exceeded the guideline this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149530, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84141

Pollutant:

DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The DDT criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.001 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149530, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84142

Pollutant:

DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

State Water Board staff assessed Agwaiver data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for DDT(p,p). Four sample result(s) were not used in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the objective and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy.

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The DDT-4,4' criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.00059 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149530, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

2032

Pollutant:

DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fish tissue analysis

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Two out of 2 samples exceeded (note: Whole fish sample of fathead minnow exceeded NAS Guideline in 1994). A filet composite sample of goldfish and one individual sample of brown bullhead were collected. Goldfish were collected in 1993 while brown bullhead were collected in 1994. The guideline was exceeded in both samples (TSMP, 2002).

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Los Angeles RWQCB Basin Plan: Toxic pollutants shall not be present at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic life to levels which are harmful to aquatic life or human health.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

OEHHA Screening Value: 100 ng/g for DDT

Guideline Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Spatial Representation:

One station located above culvert in Oxnard Drain 2 at Perimeter Road crossing.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected in 1993-94.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Toxic Substances Monitoring Program 1992-93 and 1994-95 Data Reports.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149530, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

260017

Pollutant:

DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for DDT(p,p'). Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The DDT(4,4') criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.001 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2010-12-19 to 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149530, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

259938

Pollutant:

DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 21 of the 21 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for DDT(p,p'). Although a total of 43 samples were collected, 22 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The DDT(4,4') criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.001 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2010-11-09 to 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149530, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

259889

Pollutant:

DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for DDT(p,p'). Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The DDT(4,4') criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.001 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2010-12-19 to 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149530, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

259898

Pollutant:

DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 21 of the 21 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for DDT(p,p'). Although a total of 43 samples were collected, 22 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The DDT(4,4') criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.001 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2010-11-09 to 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.


DECISION ID	136458	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Toxaphene
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed with USEPA approved TMDL)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed with USEPA approved TMDL)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	A Source Unknown
TMDL Name:	Calleguas Creek Historic Pesticides (5)
TMDL Project Code:	358
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA:	03/24/2006
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for removal on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 2.2 and sections 4.1 and 4.5 of the Listing Policy. Under sections 4.1 and 4.5 of the Policy, a minimum of one line of evidence is needed to assess listing status. 6 lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of the 0 samples exceed the criteria. 0 of the 0 samples exceed the criteria. 12 of the 12 samples exceed the criteria. 12 of the 12 samples exceed the criteria. 3 of the 3 samples exceed the criteria. 2 of the 2 samples exceed the screening value for toxaphene in fish tissue. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List. There is sufficient justification to place it in the Being Addressed portion of the CWA 303(d) List because a TMDL has been completed and approved by RWQCB and USEPA, and is expected to result in attainment of the standard. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 0, 0 of 0, 12 of 12, 12 of12, and 3 of 3 samples exceeded the criteria and 2 of 2 samples exceed the screening value and these exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. The TMDLs for Organochlorine Pesticides, Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Siltation in Calleguas Creek, Its Tributaries, and Mugu Lagoon was approved on 3/24/2006 5. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. LOE 84179 is not being considered for this decision because this waterbody should not have been assessed for the Estuarine Habitat beneficial use. These data are instead assessed in LOE 84180 for Commercial collection of fish and shellfish.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136458, Toxaphene	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84180

Pollutant:

Toxaphene

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

State Water Board staff assessed Agwaiver data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 3 samples exceed the criterion for Toxaphene. Three sample result(s) were not used in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the objective and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Toxaphene criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.00075 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136458, Toxaphene	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84179

Pollutant:

Toxaphene

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Toxaphene criteria for the protection of saltwater aquatic life is 0.0002 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136458, Toxaphene	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

267781

Pollutant:

Toxaphene

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 12 of the 12 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Toxaphene. Although a total of 42 samples were collected, 30 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The toxaphene criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.0002 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2010-11-09 to 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136458, Toxaphene	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

267724

Pollutant:

Toxaphene

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Toxaphene. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The toxaphene criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.0002 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2010-12-19 to 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136458, Toxaphene	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

2030

Pollutant:

Toxaphene

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Fish tissue analysis

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Los Angeles RWQCB Basin Plan: Toxic pollutants shall not be present at levels that will bioaccumulate in aquatic life to levels which are harmful to aquatic life or human health.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

OEHHA Screening Value: 30 ng/g for toxaphene.

Guideline Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Spatial Representation:

One station located above culvert in Oxnard Drain #2 at Perimeter Road crossing.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected annually 1993-94.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Toxic Substances Monitoring Program 1992-93 and 1994-95 Data Reports.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136458, Toxaphene	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

267974

Pollutant:

Toxaphene

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 12 of the 12 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Toxaphene. Although a total of 42 samples were collected, 30 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The toxaphene criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.0002 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2010-11-09 to 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136458, Toxaphene	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

267689

Pollutant:

Toxaphene

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Toxaphene. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The toxaphene criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.0002 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2010-12-19 to 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.


DECISION ID	136464	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Aldrin
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 2, 0 of 2, 0 of 0, 0 of 6, 0 of 43 and 0 of 43 samples exceeded the guideline and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136464, Aldrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

256398

Pollutant:

Aldrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The aldrin criterion maximum concentration (expressed as a 1-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 1.5 ug/L. The criterion of 3 ug/L provided in the California Toxics Rule is an instantaneous maximum concentration and was divided by 2 in order to better represent a criterion maximum concentration (CMC) value as specified in footnote (g) of Table (b)(1) of the California Toxics Rule (2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136464, Aldrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

256435

Pollutant:

Aldrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136464, Aldrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

256391

Pollutant:

Aldrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136464, Aldrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84117

Pollutant:

Aldrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

State Water Board staff assessed Agwaiver data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 0 samples exceed the criterion for Aldrin. Six sample result(s) were not used in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the objective and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The Aldrin criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of organisms is 0.000050 ug/L (National Recommended Water Quality Criteria 2009).

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136464, Aldrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84119

Pollutant:

Aldrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Aldrin criteria for the protection of saltwater aquatic life is 1.3 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136464, Aldrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

256310

Pollutant:

Aldrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.


DECISION ID	136438	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Arsenic
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 45 and 0 of 45 samples exceeded the criteria and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136438, Arsenic	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

257300

Pollutant:

Arsenic

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The dissolved arsenic criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 150 ug/L. The conversion factor used to convert the total fraction criterion for arsenic to dissolved fraction criterion is 1. Therefore all data was considered to be representative of the dissolved fraction. (California Toxics Rule, 2000)

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136438, Arsenic	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

257399

Pollutant:

Arsenic

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.


DECISION ID	136439	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Atrazine
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136439, Atrazine	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

257367

Pollutant:

Atrazine

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for Atrazine is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of < 1 ug/L for a nonvascular plant (acute). The benchmark was derived from a 'less-than' value (for example, <1,500) and may underestimate toxicity.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2010-12-19

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136439, Atrazine	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

257694

Pollutant:

Atrazine

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2010-12-19

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.


DECISION ID	136440	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Cadmium
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 45 and 0 of 45 samples exceeded the criterion and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136440, Cadmium	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

258038

Pollutant:

Cadmium

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The dissolved cadmium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is hardness dependent. The criterion when calculated using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 2.2 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136440, Cadmium	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

258067

Pollutant:

Cadmium

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.


DECISION ID	136443	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Copper
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 45 and 0 of 45 samples exceeded the criteria and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136443, Copper	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

259094

Pollutant:

Copper

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The dissolved copper criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is hardness dependent. The criterion when calculated using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 9 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136443, Copper	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

259070

Pollutant:

Copper

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.


DECISION ID	152529	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Cyhalothrin, Lambda
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 152529, Cyhalothrin, Lambda	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310504

Pollutant:

Cyhalothrin, Lambda

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed ILRP 2007-2009 data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Lambda-cyhalothrin. Although a total of 6 samples were collected, 6 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The chronic criterion for lambda-cyhalothrin is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of lambda-cyhalothrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used.

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Criteria Report for Lambda-cyhalothrin

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2008-01-05 to 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 152529, Cyhalothrin, Lambda	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310733

Pollutant:

Cyhalothrin, Lambda

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Criteria Report for Lambda-cyhalothrin

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2008-01-05 to 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.


DECISION ID	136445	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Diazinon
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 2, 0 of 2, 0 of 6, 0 of 43 and 0 of 43 samples exceeded the criteria and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. Estuarine Habitat is not a beneficial use applied to this waterbody. LOE 84145 should be assessed for either Cold Freshwater Habitat or Warm Freshwater Habitat. It does not make a difference to the listing decision if it is considered separately or added to either of the other LOEs.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136445, Diazinon	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

260106

Pollutant:

Diazinon

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The freshwater chronic value for diazinon is 0.10 ug/L (4 day average)(Finlayson, 2004).

Guideline Reference:

Water quality for diazinon. Memorandum to J. Karkoski, Central Valley RWQCB. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigation Unit, CA Department of Fish and Game

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136445, Diazinon	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

260029

Pollutant:

Diazinon

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The freshwater chronic value for diazinon is 0.10 ug/L (4 day average)(Finlayson, 2004).

Guideline Reference:

Water quality for diazinon. Memorandum to J. Karkoski, Central Valley RWQCB. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigation Unit, CA Department of Fish and Game

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136445, Diazinon	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

260274

Pollutant:

Diazinon

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The freshwater chronic value for diazinon is 0.10 ug/L (4 day average)(Finlayson, 2004).

Guideline Reference:

Water quality for diazinon. Memorandum to J. Karkoski, Central Valley RWQCB. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigation Unit, CA Department of Fish and Game

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136445, Diazinon	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84145

Pollutant:

Diazinon

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The chronic criterion for diazinon to protect saltwater aquatic organisms is 0.82 ug/L (EPA-822-R-05-006).

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136445, Diazinon	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

260147

Pollutant:

Diazinon

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The freshwater chronic value for diazinon is 0.10 ug/L (4 day average)(Finlayson, 2004).

Guideline Reference:

Water quality for diazinon. Memorandum to J. Karkoski, Central Valley RWQCB. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigation Unit, CA Department of Fish and Game

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.


DECISION ID	152522	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Dichlorvos
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 152522, Dichlorvos	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310328

Pollutant:

Dichlorvos

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed ILRP 2007-2009 data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Dichlorvos. Although a total of 6 samples were collected, 6 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for dichlorvos is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.0058 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic).

Guideline Reference:

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2008-01-05 to 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 152522, Dichlorvos	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310343

Pollutant:

Dichlorvos

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed ILRP 2007-2009 data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Dichlorvos. Although a total of 6 samples were collected, 6 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for dichlorvos is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.0058 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic).

Guideline Reference:

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2008-01-05 to 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	152523	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Dicofol
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 152523, Dicofol	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310395

Pollutant:

Dicofol

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed ILRP 2007-2009 data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Dicofol.

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for dicofol is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 4.4 ug/L for a fish (chronic).

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2008-01-05 and 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 152523, Dicofol	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310393

Pollutant:

Dicofol

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for dicofol is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 4.4 ug/L for a fish (chronic).

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2008-01-05 and 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.


DECISION ID	136446	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Dieldrin
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 2, 0 of 2, 0 of 6, 0 of 0, 0 of 43 and 0 of 43 samples exceeded the criterion and this does not exceed the frequency allowed by Table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136446, Dieldrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

260448

Pollutant:

Dieldrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The dieldrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.056 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136446, Dieldrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84149

Pollutant:

Dieldrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

State Water Board staff assessed Agwaiver data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 0 samples exceed the criterion for Dieldrin. Six sample result(s) were not used in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the objective and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Dieldrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.056 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136446, Dieldrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

260553

Pollutant:

Dieldrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The dieldrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.056 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136446, Dieldrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84148

Pollutant:

Dieldrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Dieldrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0019 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136446, Dieldrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

260489

Pollutant:

Dieldrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The dieldrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.056 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136446, Dieldrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

260389

Pollutant:

Dieldrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The dieldrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.056 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.


DECISION ID	152525	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Dimethoate
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 152525, Dimethoate	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310301

Pollutant:

Dimethoate

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for dimethoate is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.5 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic).

Guideline Reference:

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2008-01-05 and 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 152525, Dimethoate	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310266

Pollutant:

Dimethoate

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for dimethoate is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.5 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic).

Guideline Reference:

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2008-01-05 and 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	136447	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Endosulfan sulfate
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 2, 0 of 2, 0 of 6, 0 of 43 and 0 of 43 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136447, Endosulfan sulfate	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

260843

Pollutant:

Endosulfan sulfate

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria toxicity threshold for endosulfan sulfate for freshwater aquatic life protection is 0.056 ug/l (24 hour average)

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136447, Endosulfan sulfate	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

260888

Pollutant:

Endosulfan sulfate

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria toxicity threshold for endosulfan sulfate for freshwater aquatic life protection is 0.056 ug/l (24 hour average)

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136447, Endosulfan sulfate	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

260844

Pollutant:

Endosulfan sulfate

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria toxicity threshold for endosulfan sulfate for freshwater aquatic life protection is 0.056 ug/l (24 hour average)

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136447, Endosulfan sulfate	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84099

Pollutant:

Endosulfan sulfate

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Endosulfan Sulfate criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of organisms only is 240 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136447, Endosulfan sulfate	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

260932

Pollutant:

Endosulfan sulfate

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria toxicity threshold for endosulfan sulfate for freshwater aquatic life protection is 0.056 ug/l (24 hour average)

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.


DECISION ID	136448	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Endrin
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 2, 0 of 2, 0 of 43, 0 of 43, 0 of 6 and 0 of 6 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136448, Endrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

261321

Pollutant:

Endrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The endrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136448, Endrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

261021

Pollutant:

Endrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The endrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136448, Endrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

261244

Pollutant:

Endrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The endrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136448, Endrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

261022

Pollutant:

Endrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The endrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136448, Endrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84102

Pollutant:

Endrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Endrin criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.81ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136448, Endrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84101

Pollutant:

Endrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Endrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0023 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.


DECISION ID	152531	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 152531, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310210

Pollutant:

Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed ILRP 2007-2009 data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Esfenvalerate. Although a total of 6 samples were collected, 6 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The chronic criterion for esfenvalerate is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of esfenvalerate were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used.

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Criteria Report for Esfenvalerate

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2008-01-05 to 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 152531, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310289

Pollutant:

Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed ILRP 2007-2009 data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Esfenvalerate. Although a total of 6 samples were collected, 6 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Criteria Report for Esfenvalerate

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2008-01-05 to 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.


DECISION ID	152526	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Ethoprop
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 152526, Ethoprop	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310525

Pollutant:

Ethoprop

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for ethoprop is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.8 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic).

Guideline Reference:

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2008-01-05 and 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 152526, Ethoprop	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310530

Pollutant:

Ethoprop

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for ethoprop is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.8 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic).

Guideline Reference:

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2008-01-05 and 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	152521	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Fenvalerate
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 152521, Fenvalerate	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310712

Pollutant:

Fenvalerate

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for fenvalerate is the LC50 of 1.13 ug/L for fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas. (USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database)

Guideline Reference:

OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2008-01-05 and 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 152521, Fenvalerate	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310729

Pollutant:

Fenvalerate

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for fenvalerate is the LC50 of 1.13 ug/L for fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas. (USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database)

Guideline Reference:

OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2008-01-05 and 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.


DECISION ID	136449	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Lead
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 45 and 0 of 45 samples exceeded the criteria and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136449, Lead	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

262949

Pollutant:

Lead

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The dissolved lead criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is hardness dependent. The criterion when calculated using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 2.5 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136449, Lead	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

262906

Pollutant:

Lead

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.


DECISION ID	136450	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH)
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 2, 0 of 2, 0 of 6, 0 of 43 and 0 of 43 samples exceeded the criterion and this does not exceed the frequency allowed by Table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136450, Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

262135

Pollutant:

Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The gamma-BHC (Lindane, gamma-HCH) criterion maximum concentration to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.95 ug/L. (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136450, Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

261949

Pollutant:

Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The gamma-BHC (Lindane, gamma-HCH) criterion maximum concentration to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.95 ug/L. (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136450, Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

262030

Pollutant:

Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The gamma-BHC (Lindane, gamma-HCH) criterion maximum concentration to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.95 ug/L. (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136450, Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84112

Pollutant:

Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The gamma-BHC (Lindane) criterion maximum concentration to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.16 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136450, Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

262068

Pollutant:

Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The gamma-BHC (Lindane, gamma-HCH) criterion maximum concentration to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.95 ug/L. (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.


DECISION ID	149531	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Mercury
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Four lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 45, 0 of 45, 0 of 45 and 0 of 45 samples exceeded the guideline and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149531, Mercury	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

263463

Pollutant:

Mercury

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

National Recommended Water Quality Criteria Continuous Concentration (4-day average concentrations) for freshwater aquatic organisms exposure to total mercury is 0.77 ug/L.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149531, Mercury	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

263627

Pollutant:

Mercury

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

National Recommended Water Quality Criteria Continuous Concentration (4-day average concentrations) for freshwater aquatic organisms exposure to total mercury is 0.77 ug/L.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149531, Mercury	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

263683

Pollutant:

Mercury

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

National Recommended Water Quality Criteria Continuous Concentration (4-day average concentrations) for freshwater aquatic organisms exposure to total mercury is 0.77 ug/L.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149531, Mercury	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

263738

Pollutant:

Mercury

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

National Recommended Water Quality Criteria Continuous Concentration (4-day average concentrations) for freshwater aquatic organisms exposure to total mercury is 0.77 ug/L.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.


DECISION ID	152524	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Methidathion
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 152524, Methidathion	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310611

Pollutant:

Methidathion

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed ILRP 2007-2009 data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Methidathion.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for methidathion is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.66 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic).

Guideline Reference:

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2008-09-16 and 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 152524, Methidathion	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310664

Pollutant:

Methidathion

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed ILRP 2007-2009 data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Methidathion.

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for methidathion is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.66 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic).

Guideline Reference:

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2008-09-16 and 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	136452	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Nickel
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 45 and 0 of 45 samples exceeded the criterion and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136452, Nickel	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

264014

Pollutant:

Nickel

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The dissolved nickel criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is hardness dependent. The criterion when calculated using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 52 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136452, Nickel	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

263932

Pollutant:

Nickel

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.


DECISION ID	136455	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136455, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

264623

Pollutant:

PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls). Although a total of 37 samples were collected, 37 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The PCB, total aroclors criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.014 ug/L. This value corresponds to the sum of aroclors 1242, 1254, 1221, 1232, 1248, 1260, and 1016 (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2010-11-09 to 2017-05-10

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136455, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

264675

Pollutant:

PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls). Although a total of 37 samples were collected, 37 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2010-11-09 to 2017-05-10

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136455, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

264590

Pollutant:

PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls). Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2010-12-19 to 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136455, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

264444

Pollutant:

PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls). Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2010-12-19 to 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.


DECISION ID	152527	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Phorate
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 152527, Phorate	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310962

Pollutant:

Phorate

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for phorate is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.21 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic).

Guideline Reference:

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2008-01-05 and 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 152527, Phorate	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310997

Pollutant:

Phorate

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for phorate is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.21 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic).

Guideline Reference:

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2008-01-05 and 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	152528	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Phosmet
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 152528, Phosmet	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310849

Pollutant:

Phosmet

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed ILRP 2007-2009 data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Phosmet.

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for phosmet is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.75 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic).

Guideline Reference:

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2008-09-16 and 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 152528, Phosmet	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310852

Pollutant:

Phosmet

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed ILRP 2007-2009 data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Phosmet.

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for phosmet is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.75 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic).

Guideline Reference:

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2008-09-16 and 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	136463	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Prometryn
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136463, Prometryn	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

265478

Pollutant:

Prometryn

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

UC Davis Aquatic Life Criteria: Aquatic life should not be affected unacceptably if the four-day average concentration of Prometryn does not exceed 0.562 ug/L (Bower, et al. 2017).

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Criteria Report for Prometryn Phase III: Application of the pesticide water quality criteria methodology. Department of Environmental Toxicology. University of California, Davis.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2010-12-19

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136463, Prometryn	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

265460

Pollutant:

Prometryn

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

UC Davis Aquatic Life Criteria: Aquatic life should not be affected unacceptably if the four-day average concentration of Prometryn does not exceed 0.562 ug/L (Bower, et al. 2017).

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Criteria Report for Prometryn Phase III: Application of the pesticide water quality criteria methodology. Department of Environmental Toxicology. University of California, Davis.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2010-12-19

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.


DECISION ID	136457	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Simazine
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136457, Simazine	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

266582

Pollutant:

Simazine

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for simazine is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 6 ug/L for a nonvascular plant (acute).

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2010-12-19

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136457, Simazine	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

266561

Pollutant:

Simazine

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for simazine is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 6 ug/L for a nonvascular plant (acute).

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2010-12-19

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.


DECISION ID	136459	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Zinc
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 45 and 0 of 45 samples exceeded the criteria and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136459, Zinc	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

268528

Pollutant:

Zinc

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The dissolved zinc criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is hardness dependent. The criterion when calculated using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 120 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136459, Zinc	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

268352

Pollutant:

Zinc

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.


DECISION ID	136444	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1)
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 2, 0 of 2, 0 pf 43 and 0 of 43 samples exceeded the OBJECTIVE/GUIDELINE/CRITERIA and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136444, alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

260673

Pollutant:

alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The endosulfan I (alpha-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.056 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136444, alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

260671

Pollutant:

alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The endosulfan I (alpha-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.056 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136444, alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

260981

Pollutant:

alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The endosulfan I (alpha-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.056 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136444, alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

261005

Pollutant:

alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The endosulfan I (alpha-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.056 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.


DECISION ID	136454	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2)
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 2, 0 of 2, 0 of 43 and 0 of 43 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136454, beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

260948

Pollutant:

beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The endosulfan II (beta-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.056 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136454, beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

260994

Pollutant:

beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The endosulfan II (beta-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.056 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136454, beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

260925

Pollutant:

beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The endosulfan II (beta-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.056 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136454, beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

260928

Pollutant:

beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The endosulfan II (beta-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.056 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.


DECISION ID	136465	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Cyfluthrin
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	A Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2037
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 0, 0 of 0, 3 of 3 and 3 of 3 samples exceed the CRITERIA and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136465, Cyfluthrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310087

Pollutant:

Cyfluthrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed ILRP 2007-2009 data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin. Although a total of 6 samples were collected, 6 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The chronic criterion for cyfluthrin is 0.2 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of cyfluthrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used.

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Criteria Report for Cyfluthrin

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2008-01-05 to 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136465, Cyfluthrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

259238

Pollutant:

Cyfluthrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 3 of the 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cyfluthrin. Although a total of 43 samples were collected, 40 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Criteria Report for Cyfluthrin

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2010-11-09 to 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136465, Cyfluthrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

259259

Pollutant:

Cyfluthrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Criteria Report for Cyfluthrin

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2010-12-19 to 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136465, Cyfluthrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

259236

Pollutant:

Cyfluthrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Criteria Report for Cyfluthrin

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2010-12-19 to 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136465, Cyfluthrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

259465

Pollutant:

Cyfluthrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 3 of the 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cyfluthrin. Although a total of 43 samples were collected, 40 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Criteria Report for Cyfluthrin

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2010-11-09 to 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136465, Cyfluthrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310103

Pollutant:

Cyfluthrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed ILRP 2007-2009 data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin. Although a total of 6 samples were collected, 6 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Water Quality Criteria Report for Cyfluthrin

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2008-01-05 to 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.


DECISION ID	136462	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Cypermethrin
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	A Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2037
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 11 of 11 and 11 of 11 samples exceeded the criteria and this exceeds the allowable frequency in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136462, Cypermethrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

259737

Pollutant:

Cypermethrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The chronic criterion for cypermethrin is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of cypermethrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2010-12-19 to 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136462, Cypermethrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

259665

Pollutant:

Cypermethrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 11 of the 11 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cypermethrin. Although a total of 43 samples were collected, 32 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2010-11-09 to 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136462, Cypermethrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

259276

Pollutant:

Cypermethrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 11 of the 11 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cypermethrin. Although a total of 43 samples were collected, 32 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2010-11-09 to 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136462, Cypermethrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

259716

Pollutant:

Cypermethrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2010-12-19 to 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136462, Cypermethrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84134

Pollutant:

Cypermethrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The genus mean acute value for a grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio) of 0.016 ug/L (DFG 00-6, 2000).

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136462, Cypermethrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310045

Pollutant:

Cypermethrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed ILRP 2007-2009 data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin. Although a total of 6 samples were collected, 6 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2008-01-05 to 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136462, Cypermethrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310174

Pollutant:

Cypermethrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed ILRP 2007-2009 data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin. Although a total of 6 samples were collected, 6 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2008-01-05 to 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	136466	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Deltamethrin
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	A Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2037
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Six lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 2 of the 2 samples exceed the OBJECTIVE/GUIDELINE/CRITERIA for COLD and WARM. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 2 of 2 samples exceed the OBJECTIVE/GUIDELINE/CRITERIA and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136466, Deltamethrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

260191

Pollutant:

Deltamethrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.000026 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic).

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2010-12-19 to 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136466, Deltamethrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

260306

Pollutant:

Deltamethrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 2 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Deltamethrin. Although a total of 43 samples were collected, 41 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.000026 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic).

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2010-11-09 to 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136466, Deltamethrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

260171

Pollutant:

Deltamethrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 2 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Deltamethrin. Although a total of 43 samples were collected, 41 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.000026 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic).

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2010-11-09 to 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136466, Deltamethrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

260233

Pollutant:

Deltamethrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.000026 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic).

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2010-12-19 to 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136466, Deltamethrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310252

Pollutant:

Deltamethrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed ILRP 2007-2009 data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin. Although a total of 6 samples were collected, 6 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.000026 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic).

Guideline Reference:

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2008-01-05 to 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136466, Deltamethrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310353

Pollutant:

Deltamethrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed ILRP 2007-2009 data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin. Although a total of 6 samples were collected, 6 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.000026 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic).

Guideline Reference:

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2008-01-05 to 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	152530	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Fenpropathrin
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	A Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2037
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Three of 3 and 3 of 3 samples exceed the criteria and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 152530, Fenpropathrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310600

Pollutant:

Fenpropathrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed ILRP 2007-2009 data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 3 of the 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fenpropathrin. Although a total of 6 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for Fenpropathrin is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.0015 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic).

Guideline Reference:

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2008-01-05 to 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 152530, Fenpropathrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310479

Pollutant:

Fenpropathrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed ILRP 2007-2009 data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 3 of the 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fenpropathrin. Although a total of 6 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for Fenpropathrin is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.0015 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic).

Guideline Reference:

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2008-01-05 to 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	136451	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Malathion
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	A Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2037
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. NUMBER lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. NUMBER of the NUMBER samples exceed the OBJECTIVE/GUIDELINE/CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 1 of 2, 1 of 2, 1 of 6, 11 of 43 and 11 of 43 samples exceed the CRITERIA and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136451, Malathion	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84113

Pollutant:

Malathion

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

State Water Board staff assessed Agwaiver data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Malathion.

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The USEPA national ambient water quality criteria for saltwater aquatic life instantaneous maximum for malathion is 0.1 µg/L.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136451, Malathion	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

262939

Pollutant:

Malathion

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Aquatic life should not be affected unacceptably if the 4-day average concentration of malathion does not exceed 0.028 ug/L (UC Davis Aquatic Life Criteria).

Guideline Reference:

Aquatic life water quality criteria derived via the UC Davis method: l. Organophosphate insecticides. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 216:1-48.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136451, Malathion	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

262977

Pollutant:

Malathion

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Aquatic life should not be affected unacceptably if the 4-day average concentration of malathion does not exceed 0.028 ug/L (UC Davis Aquatic Life Criteria).

Guideline Reference:

Aquatic life water quality criteria derived via the UC Davis method: l. Organophosphate insecticides. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 216:1-48.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136451, Malathion	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

262938

Pollutant:

Malathion

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Aquatic life should not be affected unacceptably if the 4-day average concentration of malathion does not exceed 0.028 ug/L (UC Davis Aquatic Life Criteria).

Guideline Reference:

Aquatic life water quality criteria derived via the UC Davis method: l. Organophosphate insecticides. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 216:1-48.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136451, Malathion	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

262940

Pollutant:

Malathion

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Aquatic life should not be affected unacceptably if the 4-day average concentration of malathion does not exceed 0.028 ug/L (UC Davis Aquatic Life Criteria).

Guideline Reference:

Aquatic life water quality criteria derived via the UC Davis method: l. Organophosphate insecticides. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 216:1-48.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.


DECISION ID	149529	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Nitrogen, Nitrate
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	A Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2037
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 32 of 37 and 32 of 37 samples exceed the OBJECTIVE and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149529, Nitrogen, Nitrate	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

302449

Pollutant:

Nitrogen, Nitrate

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Not Recorded

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region (page 3-34) states that: Waters shall not exceed 10 mg/L as nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-02-01 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149529, Nitrogen, Nitrate	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

302411

Pollutant:

Nitrogen, Nitrate

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Not Recorded

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region (page 3-34) states that: Waters shall not exceed 10 mg/L as nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-02-01 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.


DECISION ID	136453	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Organophosphate Pesticides
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	A Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2037
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 1 of 2, 1 of 2, 4 of 43 and 4 of 43 samples exceed the GUIDELINE and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136453, Organophosphate Pesticides	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

264234

Pollutant:

Organophosphate Pesticides

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The evaluation guideline for the protection of aquatic life from the additive effects of the organophosphate pesticides chlorpyrifos and diazinon is one toxic unit equivalent. A toxic unit equivalent is equal to the sum of chlorpyrifos and diazinon from a single sample, each having their reported concentration divided their respective evaluation guideline prior to being summed. If this results in a value greater than one, the sample is considered to be in exceedance of the water quality standard. (Bailey et al., 1997).

Guideline Reference:

Joint acute toxicity of Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos to Ceriodaphnia dubia.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136453, Organophosphate Pesticides	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

264291

Pollutant:

Organophosphate Pesticides

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Joint acute toxicity of Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos to Ceriodaphnia dubia.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136453, Organophosphate Pesticides	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

264345

Pollutant:

Organophosphate Pesticides

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Joint acute toxicity of Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos to Ceriodaphnia dubia.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-12-19 and 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136453, Organophosphate Pesticides	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

264342

Pollutant:

Organophosphate Pesticides

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Joint acute toxicity of Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos to Ceriodaphnia dubia.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.


DECISION ID	136467	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Permethrin
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	A Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2037
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Sven lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Four of 4 and 4 of 4 samples exceed the CRITERIA and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136467, Permethrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310802

Pollutant:

Permethrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed ILRP 2007-2009 data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Permethrin. Although a total of 6 samples were collected, 5 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The chronic criterion for permethrin is 1 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of permethrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used.

Guideline Reference:

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2008-01-05 to 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136467, Permethrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310990

Pollutant:

Permethrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed ILRP 2007-2009 data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Permethrin. Although a total of 6 samples were collected, 5 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2008-01-05 to 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136467, Permethrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

264892

Pollutant:

Permethrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2010-12-19 to 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136467, Permethrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

264818

Pollutant:

Permethrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 3 of the 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Permethrin. Although a total of 43 samples were collected, 40 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2010-11-09 to 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136467, Permethrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

264874

Pollutant:

Permethrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 3 of the 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Permethrin. Although a total of 43 samples were collected, 40 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2010-11-09 to 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136467, Permethrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

264924

Pollutant:

Permethrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2010-12-19 to 2012-01-23

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136467, Permethrin	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84168

Pollutant:

Permethrin

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Basin Plan).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The interim criteria maximum concentration to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.001 ug/L (DFG 00-6, 2000).

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.


DECISION ID	136460	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Pyrethroids
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	A Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2037
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 1 of 1, 1 of 1, 29 of 29 and 29 of 29 samples exceed the GUIDELINE and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136460, Pyrethroids	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

265930

Pollutant:

Pyrethroids

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Pyrethroids. Although a total of 45 samples were collected, 44 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The summed ratios of the pyrethroid pesticides bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, esfenvalerate, lambda-cyhalothrin, permethrin and their respective chronic concentration goals are not to exceed 1. If the freely dissolved concentrations of these pesticides were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used.

Guideline Reference:

Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2010-11-09 to 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136460, Pyrethroids	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

265991

Pollutant:

Pyrethroids

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136460, Pyrethroids	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310749

Pollutant:

Pyrethroids

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed ILRP 2007-2009 data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Pyrethroids.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2008-01-24 and 2009-02-06

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136460, Pyrethroids	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310776

Pollutant:

Pyrethroids

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2008-01-24 and 2009-02-06

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136460, Pyrethroids	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310857

Pollutant:

Pyrethroids

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed ILRP 2007-2009 data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids. Although a total of 6 samples were collected, 6 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2008-01-05 to 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136460, Pyrethroids	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

310842

Pollutant:

Pyrethroids

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed ILRP 2007-2009 data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids. Although a total of 6 samples were collected, 6 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2008-01-05 to 2009-08-04

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136460, Pyrethroids	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

265476

Pollutant:

Pyrethroids

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Water Board staff assessed Calleguas Creek TMDL Work Plan Monitoring data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Pyrethroids. Although a total of 45 samples were collected, 44 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.

Data Reference:

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (01T_ODD2_DCH).

Temporal Representation:

Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2010-11-09 to 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136460, Pyrethroids	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

265761

Pollutant:

Pyrethroids

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.


DECISION ID	136456	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Selenium
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	A Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2037
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 24 of 45, 24 of 45, 25 of 45 and 25 of 45 samples exceed the criteria and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136456, Selenium	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

265859

Pollutant:

Selenium

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The selenium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 5 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136456, Selenium	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

265860

Pollutant:

Selenium

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Warm Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The selenium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 5 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136456, Selenium	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

265898

Pollutant:

Selenium

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The selenium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 5 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 136456, Selenium	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

265904

Pollutant:

Selenium

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Cold Freshwater Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The selenium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 5 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 01T_ODD2_DCH (Duck Pond/Mugu/Oxnard Drain #2 S. of Hueneme Rd).

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-11-09 and 2018-05-15

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. 2020. Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan.

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.


DECISION ID	69177	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Toxicity
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed with USEPA approved TMDL)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed with USEPA approved TMDL)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	Nonpoint Source
TMDL Name:	Calleguas Creek Toxicity (2)
TMDL Project Code:	355
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA:	01/01/2005
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. 3 lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of the 0 samples exceed the GUIDELINE. 1 of the 5 samples exceed the GUIDELINE. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 1 of 5 samples exceeded the GUIDELINE and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 28 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 4.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69177, Toxicity	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84181

Pollutant:

Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

TOXICITY TESTING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Five samples were collected to evaluate water toxicity. One of the five samples exhibited significant toxicity. The toxicity tests included survival of Hyalella azteca, cell density for Thalassiosira pseudonana, survival and reproduction for Ceriodaphnia dubia, survival and growth of Americamysis bahia. Statistically significant toxicity to Ceriodaphnia dubia survival and reproduction was observed on 1/5/2008.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Toxicity is defined as a statistically significant effect in the sample exposure compared to the control using EPA-recommended hypothesis testing. The t-test is used to determine if there is a statistically significant decrease in organism response in the sample as compared to the control.

Guideline Reference:

Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater and Marine Organisms, Fourth Edition. EPA 600/4-90/27.

Spatial Representation:

The samples were collected at Duck Pond/Oxnard Drain #2/Mugu Drain S. of Hueneme Rd.

Temporal Representation:

The samples were collected in June and September 2007, January and September 2008 and August 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69177, Toxicity	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

2034

Pollutant:

Sediment Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Not Recorded

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006..

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QA Info Missing

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69177, Toxicity	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

2035

Pollutant:

Toxicity

LOE Subgroup:

Toxicity

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Not Recorded

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006.

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QA Info Missing

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	95513	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Ammonia
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of 6 samples exceeded the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 6 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 95513, Ammonia	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84122

Pollutant:

Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Surface water shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The Ocean Plan ammonia objective for marine aquatic life is a 6-month median of 600 ug/L as N.

Guideline Reference:

California Ocean Plan Water Quality Control Plan Ocean Waters of California 2009

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.


DECISION ID	95402	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Azinphos-methyl (Guthion)
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of 3 samples exceeded the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 3 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 95402, Azinphos-methyl (Guthion)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84123

Pollutant:

Azinphos-methyl (Guthion)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The Azinphos methyl (Guthion) criteria for the protection of saltwater aquatic life is 0.01 ug/L (National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2009).

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 9/16/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.


DECISION ID	95789	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Chloride
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of 6 samples exceeded the OBJECTIVE. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 6 samples exceeded the OBJECTIVE and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 26 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.2. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 95789, Chloride	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84131

Pollutant:

Chloride

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Preservation of Rare & Endangered Species

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

None of the 6 samples collected exceeded the recommended level of 230 mg/L.

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use. These drains are tributary to Magu Lagoon and therefore the recommended objectives for chloride for protection of aquatic life apply. The recommended protection is a 4 day Continuous Concentration of 230 mg/L.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

samples were collected from the 01T_ODD2_DCH station.

Temporal Representation:

Samples were collected approximately thrice annually in 2008 and 2009.

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	95454	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Demeton
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of 6 samples exceeded the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 6 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 95454, Demeton	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84144

Pollutant:

Demeton

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria lists criterion continuous concentrations for Demeton to protect aquatic life in freshwater and saltwater is 0.1 ug/L.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.


DECISION ID	95733	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Endosulfan
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of 6 samples exceeded the CRITERION. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 6 samples exceeded the CRITERION and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 95733, Endosulfan	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84152

Pollutant:

Endosulfan

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The endosulfan criterion for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 89 ug/L. This value corresponds to the sum of alpha-endosulfan and beta-endosulfan (USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2006).

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.


DECISION ID	95735	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Endrin aldehyde
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of 6 samples exceeded the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 6 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 95735, Endrin aldehyde	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84103

Pollutant:

Endrin aldehyde

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The Endrin Aldehyde criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.30 ug/L (National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, 2009).

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.


DECISION ID	95400	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Heptachlor
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. 2 lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of 0 samples exceeded the CRITERIA. 0 of 6 samples exceeded the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 0 and 0 of 6 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 95400, Heptachlor	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84107

Pollutant:

Heptachlor

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

State Water Board staff assessed Agwaiver data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 0 samples exceed the criterion for Heptachlor. Six sample result(s) were not used in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the objective and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy.

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Heptachlor criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.00021 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 95400, Heptachlor	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84106

Pollutant:

Heptachlor

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Heptachlor criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.


DECISION ID	95401	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Heptachlor epoxide
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. 2 lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of 0 samples exceeded the CRITERION. 0 of 6 samples exceeded the CRITERION. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 0 and 0 of 6 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 95401, Heptachlor epoxide	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84110

Pollutant:

Heptachlor epoxide

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

State Water Board staff assessed Agwaiver data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 0 samples exceed the criterion for Heptachlor Epoxide. Six sample result(s) were not used in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the objective and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy.

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Heptachlor epoxide criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.00011 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 95401, Heptachlor epoxide	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84109

Pollutant:

Heptachlor epoxide

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Heptachlor epoxide criteria for the protection of saltwater aquatic life is 0.0036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.


DECISION ID	95512	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Methoxychlor
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of 6 samples exceeded the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 6 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 95512, Methoxychlor	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84114

Pollutant:

Methoxychlor

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The USEPA national ambient water quality criteria for saltwater aquatic life instantaneous maximum for methoxychlor is 0.03 µg/L.

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.


DECISION ID	95556	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Oxygen, Dissolved
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of 9 samples exceeded the OBJECTIVE. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 9 samples exceeded the OBJECTIVE and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 26 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.2. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 95556, Oxygen, Dissolved	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84167

Pollutant:

Oxygen, Dissolved

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Dissolved

Beneficial Use:

Fish Spawning

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region (page 3-11) states that: "The dissolved oxygen content of all surface waters designated as both COLD and SPWN shall not be depressed below 7 mg/L as a result of waste discharges."

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 6/4/2007-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.


DECISION ID	95788	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	alpha.-BHC (Benzenehexachloride or alpha-HCH)
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of 6 samples exceeded the CRITERION. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 6 samples exceeded the CRITERION and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 95788, alpha.-BHC (Benzenehexachloride or alpha-HCH)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84121

Pollutant:

alpha.-BHC (Benzenehexachloride or alpha-HCH)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The BHC, alpha criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.013 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Guideline Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.


DECISION ID	95790	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	beta-BHC (Benzenehexachloride or beta-HCH)
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of 6 samples exceeded the CRITERION. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 6 samples exceeded the CRITERION and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 95790, beta-BHC (Benzenehexachloride or beta-HCH)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84125

Pollutant:

beta-BHC (Benzenehexachloride or beta-HCH)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that affect beneficial uses.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

The BHC, beta criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.046 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Guideline Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.


DECISION ID	72210	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	delta-BHC (Benzenehexachloride or delta-HCH)
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of 6 samples exceeded the CRITERIA. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 6 samples exceeded the CRITERIA and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 72210, delta-BHC (Benzenehexachloride or delta-HCH)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84143

Pollutant:

delta-BHC (Benzenehexachloride or delta-HCH)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The BHC, delta criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.063 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.


DECISION ID	95337	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	pH
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence are necessary to assess listing status. 3 lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of 9 samples exceeded the OBJECTIVE. 0 of 9 samples exceeded the OBJECTIVE. 0 of 9 samples exceeded the OBJECTIVE. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of 9, 0 of 9 and 0 of 9 samples exceeded the OBJECTIVE and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 26 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.2. 4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 95337, pH	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84172

Pollutant:

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Water Quality Control Plan, Los Angeles Basin: the pH for insland surface waters, bays, or estuaries shall not be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.5 as a result of waste discharges.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 6/4/2007-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 95337, pH	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84170

Pollutant:

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Water Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Water Quality Control Plan, Los Angeles Basin: the pH for insland surface waters, bays, or estuaries shall not be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.5 as a result of waste discharges.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 6/4/2007-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 95337, pH	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84169

Pollutant:

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Non-Contact Recreation

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Water Quality Control Plan, Los Angeles Basin: the pH for insland surface waters, bays, or estuaries shall not be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.5 as a result of waste discharges.

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 6/4/2007-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.


DECISION ID	68974	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	ChemA
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	Nonpoint Source
TMDL Name:	Calleguas Creek Historic Pesticides (5)
TMDL Project Code:	358
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA:	03/14/2006
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for listing under section 2.2 of the Listing Policy. Under this section of the Policy, a minimum of one line of evidence is needed to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. A TMDL has been developed and approved by USEPA and an approved implementation plan is expected to result in attainment of the standard. The Calleguas Creek Historic Pesticides TMDL was approved by the RWQCB in 2005 and subsequently approved by USEPA. Based on the readily available information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination in the Water Quality Limited Segments Being Addressed portion of the section 303(d) list.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current. The decision has not changed.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 68974, ChemA	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

2033

Pollutant:

ChemA (tissue)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Tissue

Matrix:

Tissue

Fraction:

Not Recorded

Beneficial Use:

Estuarine Habitat

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006.

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Environmental Conditions:

QAPP Information:

QA Info Missing

QAPP Information Reference(s):


DECISION ID	85873	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	DDD (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane)
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	A Source Unknown
TMDL Name:	Calleguas Creek Historic Pesticides (5)
TMDL Project Code:	358
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA:	03/14/2006
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess pollutant. 2 of 2 samples exceed the OBJECTIVE. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 2 of 2 samples exceed the OBJECTIVE and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 85873, DDD (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84137

Pollutant:

DDD (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

State Water Board staff assessed Agwaiver data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for DDD(p,p). Four sample result(s) were not used in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the objective and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy.

Data Reference:

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The DDD-4,4' criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.00084 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.


DECISION ID	99641	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	DDE (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene)
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	A Source Unknown
TMDL Name:	Calleguas Creek Historic Pesticides (5)
TMDL Project Code:	358
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA:	03/14/2006
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. 1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess pollutant. 4 of 4 samples exceed the OBJECTIVE. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 4 of 4 samples exceed the OBJECTIVE and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 99641, DDE (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene)	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

84139

Pollutant:

DDE (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene)

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Water

Fraction:

Total

Beneficial Use:

Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

State Water Board staff assessed Agwaiver data for Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2 to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 4 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for DDE(p,p). Two sample result(s) were not used in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the objective and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy.

Data Reference:

Data for various Pollutants from the Ag Waiver Program, 2007-2009.

SWAMP Data:

Non-SWAMP

Water Quality Objective/Criterion:

The DDE-4,4' criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.00059 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).

Objective/Criterion Reference:

Code of Federal Regulations 40 part 131.38 Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California. 7/1/2011 Edition

Evaluation Guideline:

Guideline Reference:

Spatial Representation:

Temporal Representation:

Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2008-8/4/2009.

Environmental Conditions:

Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.

QAPP Information:

Data quality is good. A QAPP and monitoring plan was submitted. Data was collected by the Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group for Order No. R4- 2005-0080.)

QAPP Information Reference(s):

Quality Assurance Project Plan from Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group.


DECISION ID	68859	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

Pollutant:	Nitrogen
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	Nonpoint Source
TMDL Name:	Calleguas Creek Nitrogen (1)
TMDL Project Code:	228
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA:	06/20/2003
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant

Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for listing under section 2.2 of the Listing Policy. Under this section of the Policy, a minimum of one line of evidence is needed to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. A TMDL has been developed and approved by USEPA and an approved implementation plan is expected to result in attainment of the standard. The Calleguas Creek Nitrogen TMDL has an approved implementation plan. USEPA approved the TMDL on June 20, 2003. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination in the Water Quality Limited Segments Being Addressed portion of the section 303(d) list.

Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current. The decision has not changed.

State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:

State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 68859, Nitrogen	Region 4
Duck Pond Agricultural Drains/Mugu Drain/Oxnard Drain No 2

LOE ID:

2026

Pollutant:

Nitrogen

LOE Subgroup:

Pollutant-Water

Matrix:

Not Specified

Fraction:

None

Beneficial Use:

Municipal & Domestic Supply

Number of Samples:

Number of Exceedances:

Data and Information Type:

Not Specified

Data Used to Assess Water Quality:

Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006.

Data Reference: