Water Body Name: | San Diego Bay Shoreline, near sub base |
Water Body ID: | CAB9081000019990210085507 |
Water Body Type: | Bay & Harbor |
DECISION ID |
154974 |
Region 9 |
San Diego Bay Shoreline, near sub base |
||
Pollutant: | Arsenic |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 316446 | ||||
Pollutant: | Arsenic | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 14 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Staff assessed data collected by Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 14 samples exceeded the water quality threshold in sediment for arsenic. | ||||
Data Reference: | Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base, San Diego, Draft Final Report. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The value used in this assessment comes from Long et al., 1995 and is the effects range median (ERM) value of 70 ug/g. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Development and evaluation of sediment quality guidelines for Florida coastal waters. Ecotoxicology 5: 253-278 | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Fourteen sampling stations were layed out in a grid pattern covering approximately 60 acres in around Piers November, Mike, and Sierra. Three of the stations are in the area originally listed as impaired on the current 303d list. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected in April 2004. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Sampling and analysis and quality assurance plans followed the general guidelines from previous San Diego Bay TMDL studies conducted by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, U.S. Navy, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | This is a placeholder for previously assessed data that does not have quality assurance information but would require it under newly developed policies. These LOEs were previously assessed and approved at the Regional, State and Federal level in past cycles. The LOEs needed to be moved and/or reassessed but required this reference code for movement within the decision making database. | ||||
DECISION ID |
154975 |
Region 9 |
San Diego Bay Shoreline, near sub base |
||
Pollutant: | Cadmium |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 316458 | ||||
Pollutant: | Cadmium | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Tissue | ||||
Matrix: | Tissue | ||||
Fraction: | Shellfish | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Shellfish Harvesting | ||||
Number of Samples: | 7 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Staff assessed data collected by Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold in shellfish tissue for cadmium. | ||||
Data Reference: | Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base, San Diego, Draft Final Report. | ||||
Tissue conversions for data in Ref2793 (Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base San Diego). | |||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for cadmium in shellfish tissue is 3.3 ppm. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 21 g/day. (Brodberg, R.K., and G.A. Pollock, 1999; Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008; USEPA, 2000) | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Prevalence of Selected Target Chemical Contaminants in Sport Fish From Two California Lakes: Public health designed screening study. Sacramento, CA: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Guidance for Assessing Chemical Contaminant Data for Use In Fish Advisories Volume 1: Fish Sampling and Analysis | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Seven sampling stations were layed out in a grid pattern covering approximately 60 acres in around Piers November, Mike, and Sierra. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected in April 2004. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Sampling and analysis and quality assurance plans followed the general guidelines from previous San Diego Bay TMDL studies conducted by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, U.S. Navy, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | This is a placeholder for previously assessed data that does not have quality assurance information but would require it under newly developed policies. These LOEs were previously assessed and approved at the Regional, State and Federal level in past cycles. The LOEs needed to be moved and/or reassessed but required this reference code for movement within the decision making database. | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 316447 | ||||
Pollutant: | Cadmium | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 14 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Staff assessed data collected by Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 14 samples exceeded the water quality threshold in sediment for cadmium. | ||||
Data Reference: | Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base, San Diego, Draft Final Report. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The evaluation guideline for Cadmium from MacDonald et al. 1996, which states that the probable effect level for Cadmium is 4.21 ug/g. (dw = Dry Weight) | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Development and evaluation of sediment quality guidelines for Florida coastal waters. Ecotoxicology 5: 253-278 | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Fourteen sampling stations were layed out in a grid pattern covering approximately 60 acres in around Piers November, Mike, and Sierra. Three of the stations are in the area originally listed as impaired on the current 303d list. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected in April 2004. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Sampling and analysis and quality assurance plans followed the general guidelines from previous San Diego Bay TMDL studies conducted by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, U.S. Navy, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | This is a placeholder for previously assessed data that does not have quality assurance information but would require it under newly developed policies. These LOEs were previously assessed and approved at the Regional, State and Federal level in past cycles. The LOEs needed to be moved and/or reassessed but required this reference code for movement within the decision making database. | ||||
DECISION ID |
154976 |
Region 9 |
San Diego Bay Shoreline, near sub base |
||
Pollutant: | Chlordane |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 316448 | ||||
Pollutant: | Chlordane | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 14 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Staff assessed data collected by Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 14 samples exceeded the water quality threshold in sediment for chlordane. | ||||
Data Reference: | Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base, San Diego, Draft Final Report. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | In marine and estuarine sediments the effects range median (predictive of sediment toxicity for sediment-dwelling organisms) for Total Chlordane is 6 ng/g dry weight (Long and Morgan, 1990). | ||||
Guideline Reference: | The potential for biological effects of sediment-sorbed contaminants tested in the National Status of Trends Program. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS OMA 52. Seattle, WA: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Fourteen sampling stations were layed out in a grid pattern covering approximately 60 acres in around Piers November, Mike, and Sierra. Three of the stations are in the area originally listed as impaired on the current 303d list. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected in April 2004. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Sampling and analysis and quality assurance plans followed the general guidelines from previous San Diego Bay TMDL studies conducted by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, U.S. Navy, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | This is a placeholder for previously assessed data that does not have quality assurance information but would require it under newly developed policies. These LOEs were previously assessed and approved at the Regional, State and Federal level in past cycles. The LOEs needed to be moved and/or reassessed but required this reference code for movement within the decision making database. | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 316459 | ||||
Pollutant: | Chlordane | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Tissue | ||||
Matrix: | Tissue | ||||
Fraction: | Shellfish | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Shellfish Harvesting | ||||
Number of Samples: | 7 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Staff assessed data collected by Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold in shellfish tissue for chlordane. | ||||
Data Reference: | Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base, San Diego, Draft Final Report. | ||||
Tissue conversions for data in Ref2793 (Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base San Diego). | |||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for total chlordane in shellfish tissue is 6.0 ppb. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 21 g/day for a 30 year exposure over a 70-year lifetime. This constituent is a carcinogen therefore the risk level is set to one in a million. (Brodberg, R.K., and G.A. Pollock, 1999; Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008) | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Prevalence of Selected Target Chemical Contaminants in Sport Fish From Two California Lakes: Public health designed screening study. Sacramento, CA: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Seven sampling stations were layed out in a grid pattern covering approximately 60 acres in around Piers November, Mike, and Sierra. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected in April 2004. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Sampling and analysis and quality assurance plans followed the general guidelines from previous San Diego Bay TMDL studies conducted by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, U.S. Navy, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | This is a placeholder for previously assessed data that does not have quality assurance information but would require it under newly developed policies. These LOEs were previously assessed and approved at the Regional, State and Federal level in past cycles. The LOEs needed to be moved and/or reassessed but required this reference code for movement within the decision making database. | ||||
DECISION ID |
154983 |
Region 9 |
San Diego Bay Shoreline, near sub base |
||
Pollutant: | Chromium |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 316449 | ||||
Pollutant: | Chromium | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 14 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Staff assessed data collected by Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 14 samples exceeded the water quality threshold in sediment for chromium. | ||||
Data Reference: | Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base, San Diego, Draft Final Report. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The value used in this assessment comes from Long et al., 1995, is the effects range median (ERM) value of 370 PPM (ug/g) | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Development and evaluation of sediment quality guidelines for Florida coastal waters. Ecotoxicology 5: 253-278 | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Fourteen sampling stations were layed out in a grid pattern covering approximately 60 acres in around Piers November, Mike, and Sierra. Three of the stations are in the area originally listed as impaired on the current 303d list. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected in April 2004. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Sampling and analysis and quality assurance plans followed the general guidelines from previous San Diego Bay TMDL studies conducted by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, U.S. Navy, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | This is a placeholder for previously assessed data that does not have quality assurance information but would require it under newly developed policies. These LOEs were previously assessed and approved at the Regional, State and Federal level in past cycles. The LOEs needed to be moved and/or reassessed but required this reference code for movement within the decision making database. | ||||
DECISION ID |
154977 |
Region 9 |
San Diego Bay Shoreline, near sub base |
||
Pollutant: | Copper |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 316450 | ||||
Pollutant: | Copper | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 14 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Staff assessed data collected by Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 14 samples exceeded the water quality threshold in sediment for copper. | ||||
Data Reference: | Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base, San Diego, Draft Final Report. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The value used in this assessment comes from Long et al., 1995, is the effects range median (ERM) value of 270 PPM (ug/g) | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Development and evaluation of sediment quality guidelines for Florida coastal waters. Ecotoxicology 5: 253-278 | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Fourteen sampling stations were layed out in a grid pattern covering approximately 60 acres in around Piers November, Mike, and Sierra. Three of the stations are in the area originally listed as impaired on the current 303d list. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected in April 2004. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Sampling and analysis and quality assurance plans followed the general guidelines from previous San Diego Bay TMDL studies conducted by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, U.S. Navy, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | This is a placeholder for previously assessed data that does not have quality assurance information but would require it under newly developed policies. These LOEs were previously assessed and approved at the Regional, State and Federal level in past cycles. The LOEs needed to be moved and/or reassessed but required this reference code for movement within the decision making database. | ||||
DECISION ID |
155016 |
Region 9 |
San Diego Bay Shoreline, near sub base |
||
Pollutant: | DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 316462 | ||||
Pollutant: | DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Tissue | ||||
Matrix: | Tissue | ||||
Fraction: | Shellfish | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Shellfish Harvesting | ||||
Number of Samples: | 7 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Staff assessed data collected by Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold in shellfish tissue for DDT. | ||||
Data Reference: | Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base, San Diego, Draft Final Report. | ||||
Tissue conversions for data in Ref2793 (Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base San Diego). | |||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for total DDT in shellfish tissue is 23 ppb. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 21 g/day for a 30 year exposure over a 70-year lifetime. This constituent is a carcinogen therefore the risk level is set to one in a million. (Brodberg, R.K., and G.A. Pollock, 1999; Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008) | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Prevalence of Selected Target Chemical Contaminants in Sport Fish From Two California Lakes: Public health designed screening study. Sacramento, CA: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Seven sampling stations were layed out in a grid pattern covering approximately 60 acres in around Piers November, Mike, and Sierra. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected in April 2004. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Sampling and analysis and quality assurance plans followed the general guidelines from previous San Diego Bay TMDL studies conducted by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, U.S. Navy, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | This is a placeholder for previously assessed data that does not have quality assurance information but would require it under newly developed policies. These LOEs were previously assessed and approved at the Regional, State and Federal level in past cycles. The LOEs needed to be moved and/or reassessed but required this reference code for movement within the decision making database. | ||||
DECISION ID |
154978 |
Region 9 |
San Diego Bay Shoreline, near sub base |
||
Pollutant: | Lead |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 316451 | ||||
Pollutant: | Lead | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 14 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Staff assessed data collected by Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 14 samples exceeded the water quality threshold in sediment for lead. | ||||
Data Reference: | Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base, San Diego, Draft Final Report. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The evaluation guideline for Lead from MacDonald et al. 1996, which states that the probable effect level for Lead is 112.18 mg/kg. (dw = Dry Weight) | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Development and evaluation of sediment quality guidelines for Florida coastal waters. Ecotoxicology 5: 253-278 | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Fourteen sampling stations were layed out in a grid pattern covering approximately 60 acres in around Piers November, Mike, and Sierra. Three of the stations are in the area originally listed as impaired on the current 303d list. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected in April 2004. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Sampling and analysis and quality assurance plans followed the general guidelines from previous San Diego Bay TMDL studies conducted by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, U.S. Navy, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | This is a placeholder for previously assessed data that does not have quality assurance information but would require it under newly developed policies. These LOEs were previously assessed and approved at the Regional, State and Federal level in past cycles. The LOEs needed to be moved and/or reassessed but required this reference code for movement within the decision making database. | ||||
DECISION ID |
155014 |
Region 9 |
San Diego Bay Shoreline, near sub base |
||
Pollutant: | Mercury |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 316452 | ||||
Pollutant: | Mercury | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 14 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Staff assessed data collected by Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 14 samples exceeded the water quality threshold in sediment for mercury. | ||||
Data Reference: | Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base, San Diego, Draft Final Report. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The evaluation guideline used in this assessment comes form PTI Environmental Services, 1991, and is 2.1 ug/g. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | An evaluation of methods for calculating mean sediment quality guideline quotients as indicators of contamination and acute toxicity to amphipods by chemical mixtures. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 20(10): 2276-2286 | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Fourteen sampling stations were layed out in a grid pattern covering approximately 60 acres in around Piers November, Mike, and Sierra. Three of the stations are in the area originally listed as impaired on the current 303d list. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected in April 2004. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Sampling and analysis and quality assurance plans followed the general guidelines from previous San Diego Bay TMDL studies conducted by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, U.S. Navy, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | This is a placeholder for previously assessed data that does not have quality assurance information but would require it under newly developed policies. These LOEs were previously assessed and approved at the Regional, State and Federal level in past cycles. The LOEs needed to be moved and/or reassessed but required this reference code for movement within the decision making database. | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 316463 | ||||
Pollutant: | Mercury | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Tissue | ||||
Matrix: | Tissue | ||||
Fraction: | Shellfish | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Shellfish Harvesting | ||||
Number of Samples: | 7 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Staff assessed data collected by Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold in shellfish tissue for mercury. | ||||
Data Reference: | Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base, San Diego, Draft Final Report. | ||||
Tissue conversions for data in Ref2793 (Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base San Diego). | |||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The USEPA 304(a) recommended water quality criterion for concentrations of methylmercury in shellfish tissue (wet weight) is 0.20 ppm. (Brodberg, R.K., and G.A. Pollock, 1999; USEPA, 2001) | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Prevalence of Selected Target Chemical Contaminants in Sport Fish From Two California Lakes: Public health designed screening study. Sacramento, CA: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality Criterion for the Protection of Human Health: Methylmercury. Final. United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Science and Technology Office of Water. EPA-823-R-01-001. January 2001 | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Seven sampling stations were layed out in a grid pattern covering approximately 60 acres in around Piers November, Mike, and Sierra. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected in April 2004. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Sampling and analysis and quality assurance plans followed the general guidelines from previous San Diego Bay TMDL studies conducted by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, U.S. Navy, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | This is a placeholder for previously assessed data that does not have quality assurance information but would require it under newly developed policies. These LOEs were previously assessed and approved at the Regional, State and Federal level in past cycles. The LOEs needed to be moved and/or reassessed but required this reference code for movement within the decision making database. | ||||
DECISION ID |
154979 |
Region 9 |
San Diego Bay Shoreline, near sub base |
||
Pollutant: | Nickel |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 316453 | ||||
Pollutant: | Nickel | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 14 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Staff assessed data collected by Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 14 samples exceeded the water quality threshold in sediment for nickel. | ||||
Data Reference: | Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base, San Diego, Draft Final Report. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | In saline water sediments the effects range median (predictive of sediment toxicity) for nickel is 51.6 mg/Kg dry weight ( Long, E.R., D.D. MacDonald, S.L. Smith, and F.D. Calder. 1995). | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentrations in marine and estuary sediments. Environmental Management. 19, (1): 81-97 | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Fourteen sampling stations were layed out in a grid pattern covering approximately 60 acres in around Piers November, Mike, and Sierra. Three of the stations are in the area originally listed as impaired on the current 303d list. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected in April 2004. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Sampling and analysis and quality assurance plans followed the general guidelines from previous San Diego Bay TMDL studies conducted by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, U.S. Navy, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | This is a placeholder for previously assessed data that does not have quality assurance information but would require it under newly developed policies. These LOEs were previously assessed and approved at the Regional, State and Federal level in past cycles. The LOEs needed to be moved and/or reassessed but required this reference code for movement within the decision making database. | ||||
DECISION ID |
155015 |
Region 9 |
San Diego Bay Shoreline, near sub base |
||
Pollutant: | PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons) |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 316455 | ||||
Pollutant: | PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 14 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Staff assessed data collected by Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 14 samples exceeded the water quality threshold in sediment for high molecular weight PAHs. | ||||
Data Reference: | Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base, San Diego, Draft Final Report. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The evaluation guideline for high molecular weight PAH's is 9600 ng/g dry weight (Long et al., 1995). | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentrations in marine and estuary sediments. Environmental Management. 19, (1): 81-97 | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Fourteen sampling stations were layed out in a grid pattern covering approximately 60 acres in around Piers November, Mike, and Sierra. Three of the stations are in the area originally listed as impaired on the current 303d list. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected in April 2004. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Sampling and analysis and quality assurance plans followed the general guidelines from previous San Diego Bay TMDL studies conducted by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, U.S. Navy, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | This is a placeholder for previously assessed data that does not have quality assurance information but would require it under newly developed policies. These LOEs were previously assessed and approved at the Regional, State and Federal level in past cycles. The LOEs needed to be moved and/or reassessed but required this reference code for movement within the decision making database. | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 316454 | ||||
Pollutant: | PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 14 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Staff assessed data collected by Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 14 samples exceeded the water quality threshold in sediment for low molecular weight PAHs. | ||||
Data Reference: | Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base, San Diego, Draft Final Report. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The evaluation guideline for Low molecular weight from MacDonald et al. 1996, which states that the probable effect level for Low molecular weight is 1442 ug/kg. (dw = Dry Weight) | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Development and evaluation of sediment quality guidelines for Florida coastal waters. Ecotoxicology 5: 253-278 | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Fourteen sampling stations were layed out in a grid pattern covering approximately 60 acres in around Piers November, Mike, and Sierra. Three of the stations are in the area originally listed as impaired on the current 303d list. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected in April 2004. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Sampling and analysis and quality assurance plans followed the general guidelines from previous San Diego Bay TMDL studies conducted by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, U.S. Navy, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | This is a placeholder for previously assessed data that does not have quality assurance information but would require it under newly developed policies. These LOEs were previously assessed and approved at the Regional, State and Federal level in past cycles. The LOEs needed to be moved and/or reassessed but required this reference code for movement within the decision making database. | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 316460 | ||||
Pollutant: | PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Tissue | ||||
Matrix: | Tissue | ||||
Fraction: | Shellfish | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Shellfish Harvesting | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Staff assessed data collected by Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 0 samples exceeded the water quality threshold in shellfish tissue for PAHs. | ||||
Data Reference: | Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base, San Diego, Draft Final Report. | ||||
Tissue conversions for data in Ref2793 (Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base San Diego). | |||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in shellfish tissue is 1.1 ppb. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 21 g/day for a 30 year exposure over a 70-year lifetime. This constituent is a carcinogen therefore the risk level is set to one in a million. (Brodberg, R.K., and G.A. Pollock, 1999; Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008; USEPA, 2000) | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Prevalence of Selected Target Chemical Contaminants in Sport Fish From Two California Lakes: Public health designed screening study. Sacramento, CA: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Guidance for Assessing Chemical Contaminant Data for Use In Fish Advisories Volume 1: Fish Sampling and Analysis | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Seven sampling stations were layed out in a grid pattern covering approximately 60 acres in around Piers November, Mike, and Sierra. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected in April 2004. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Sampling and analysis and quality assurance plans followed the general guidelines from previous San Diego Bay TMDL studies conducted by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, U.S. Navy, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | This is a placeholder for previously assessed data that does not have quality assurance information but would require it under newly developed policies. These LOEs were previously assessed and approved at the Regional, State and Federal level in past cycles. The LOEs needed to be moved and/or reassessed but required this reference code for movement within the decision making database. | ||||
DECISION ID |
154980 |
Region 9 |
San Diego Bay Shoreline, near sub base |
||
Pollutant: | PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 316456 | ||||
Pollutant: | PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 14 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Staff assessed data collected by Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 14 samples exceeded the water quality threshold in sediment for PCBs. | ||||
Data Reference: | Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base, San Diego, Draft Final Report. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The value used in this assessment comes from MacDonald et al., 2000b is the effects range median (ERM) value of 400 ng/g | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413 | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Fourteen sampling stations were layed out in a grid pattern covering approximately 60 acres in around Piers November, Mike, and Sierra. Three of the stations are in the area originally listed as impaired on the current 303d list. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected in April 2004. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Sampling and analysis and quality assurance plans followed the general guidelines from previous San Diego Bay TMDL studies conducted by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, U.S. Navy, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | This is a placeholder for previously assessed data that does not have quality assurance information but would require it under newly developed policies. These LOEs were previously assessed and approved at the Regional, State and Federal level in past cycles. The LOEs needed to be moved and/or reassessed but required this reference code for movement within the decision making database. | ||||
DECISION ID |
154981 |
Region 9 |
San Diego Bay Shoreline, near sub base |
||
Pollutant: | Silver |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 316457 | ||||
Pollutant: | Silver | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Sediment | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 14 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Staff assessed data collected by Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 14 samples exceeded the water quality threshold in sediment for silver. | ||||
Data Reference: | Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base, San Diego, Draft Final Report. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The evaluation guideline for Silver from MacDonald et al. 1996, which states that the probable effect level for Silver is 1.77 ug/g. (dw = Dry Weight) | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Development and evaluation of sediment quality guidelines for Florida coastal waters. Ecotoxicology 5: 253-278 | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Fourteen sampling stations were layed out in a grid pattern covering approximately 60 acres in around Piers November, Mike, and Sierra. Three of the stations are in the area originally listed as impaired on the current 303d list. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected in April 2004. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Sampling and analysis and quality assurance plans followed the general guidelines from previous San Diego Bay TMDL studies conducted by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, U.S. Navy, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | This is a placeholder for previously assessed data that does not have quality assurance information but would require it under newly developed policies. These LOEs were previously assessed and approved at the Regional, State and Federal level in past cycles. The LOEs needed to be moved and/or reassessed but required this reference code for movement within the decision making database. | ||||
DECISION ID |
154982 |
Region 9 |
San Diego Bay Shoreline, near sub base |
||
Pollutant: | Tributyltin TBT (Tributylstanne) |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 316461 | ||||
Pollutant: | Tributyltin TBT (Tributylstanne) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Tissue | ||||
Matrix: | Tissue | ||||
Fraction: | Shellfish | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Shellfish Harvesting | ||||
Number of Samples: | 7 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Staff assessed data collected by Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold in shellfish tissue for Tributyltin TBT (Tributylstanne). | ||||
Data Reference: | Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base, San Diego, Draft Final Report. | ||||
Tissue conversions for data in Ref2793 (Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base San Diego). | |||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for tributyltin in shellfish tissue is 1 ppm. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 21 g/day. (Brodberg, R.K., and G.A. Pollock, 1999; Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008; USEPA, 2000) | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Prevalence of Selected Target Chemical Contaminants in Sport Fish From Two California Lakes: Public health designed screening study. Sacramento, CA: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Guidance for Assessing Chemical Contaminant Data for Use In Fish Advisories Volume 1: Fish Sampling and Analysis | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Seven sampling stations were layed out in a grid pattern covering approximately 60 acres in around Piers November, Mike, and Sierra. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected in April 2004. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Sampling and analysis and quality assurance plans followed the general guidelines from previous San Diego Bay TMDL studies conducted by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, U.S. Navy, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | This is a placeholder for previously assessed data that does not have quality assurance information but would require it under newly developed policies. These LOEs were previously assessed and approved at the Regional, State and Federal level in past cycles. The LOEs needed to be moved and/or reassessed but required this reference code for movement within the decision making database. | ||||
DECISION ID |
76752 |
Region 9 |
San Diego Bay Shoreline, near sub base |
||
Pollutant: | Benthic Community Effects |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Sources: | A Source Unknown |
TMDL Priority: | Low |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Region 9 data was not included in the 2012 Integrated Report so all decisions are carried over from the 2010 listing cycle.
This pollutant is being considered for removal from the section 303(d) list under section 4.9 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of samples exceeded the water quality criteria for benthic invertebrates. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the nineteen samples exceeded the water quality criteria for benthic invertebrates and this does not satisfy the minimum sample requirements to de-list according to Table 4.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met. The data for this site will be reassessed in future listing cycles in accordance with the California Sediment Quality Objectives. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | Region 9 data was not included in the 2012 Integrated Report so all decisions are carried over from the 2010 listing cycle.
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 30045 | ||||
Pollutant: | Benthic Community Effects | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollution | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Aquatic Life Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 14 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Twelve of the 14 sediment samples had BRI scores less than 31. The remaining two stations had BRI scores of 31.3 and 34.4 which place them in the lower end of Response Level 1.
Sample collection was conducted by Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego in April 2004 at Submarine Base San Diego. |
||||
Data Reference: | Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base, San Diego, Draft Final Report. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The magnitude of disturbance shown by the benthic assemblage at each station was described by the embayment Benthic Response Index (BRI). BRI values in Response Level 2 or greater were consider degraded.
Benthic Response Index (BRI) Categories: Reference: < 31 Response Level 1. 31 to 42 Response Level 2: 42 to 53 Response Level 3: 53 to 73 Response Level 4: > 73 |
||||
Guideline Reference: | Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base, San Diego, Draft Final Report. | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Fourteen sampling stations were layed out in a grid pattern covering approximately 60 acres in around Piers November, Mike, and Sierra. Three of the stations are in the area originally listed as impaired on the current 303d list. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected in April 2004. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Sampling and analysis and quality assurance plans followed the general guidelines from previous San Diego Bay TMDL studies conducted by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, U.S. Navy, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 4707 | ||||
Pollutant: | Benthic Community Effects | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Population/Community Degradation | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Not Recorded | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | |||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | |||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Unspecified | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Unspecified | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Unspecified | ||||
QAPP Information: | Unspecified | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
77325 |
Region 9 |
San Diego Bay Shoreline, near sub base |
||
Pollutant: | Toxicity |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Sources: | A Source Unknown |
TMDL Priority: | Low |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | The decision has not changed from the previous listing cycle. No new data were assessed for the current listing cycle. Therefore, the previous conclusion remains unchanged, and is as follows:
This pollutant is being considered for removal from the section 303(d) list under section 4.1 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. [In 2006, water toxicity had been included in the Sediment Toxicity listing] Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess pollutant. Three of 14 samples exceed the water quality objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Three of 14 samples exceeded the toxicity water quality objective and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current cycle. The decision has not changed. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 29978 | ||||
Pollutant: | Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Aquatic Life Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 14 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 14 sediment samples were statistically significantly different from the control and below the minimum significant difference threshold for marine amphipods. Sample collection was conducted by Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego in April 2004 at Submarine Base San Diego. | ||||
Data Reference: | Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base, San Diego, Draft Final Report. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The sample is consider toxic if there is statistically significant difference from the control and the minimum significant difference threshold is exceeded for the test species Eohaustorius estuarius. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base, San Diego, Draft Final Report. | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Fourteen sampling stations were layed out in a grid pattern covering approximately 60 acres in around Piers November, Mike, and Sierra. Three of the stations are in the area originally listed as impaired on the current 303d list. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected in April 2004. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Sampling and analysis and quality assurance plans followed the general guidelines from previous San Diego Bay TMDL studies conducted by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, U.S. Navy, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 4708 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sediment Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Sediment | ||||
Fraction: | Not Recorded | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Not Specified | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. | ||||
Data Reference: | Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | |||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | |||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Unspecified | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Unspecified | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Unspecified | ||||
QAPP Information: | Unspecified | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 30035 | ||||
Pollutant: | Toxicity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Toxicity | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Aquatic Life Use: | Marine Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 14 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 3 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Toxicity testing of sediments | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | One of the 14 sediment samples were statistically significantly different from the control and below the minimum significant difference threshold for mussel larvae Mytilus galloprovincialis.
Three of the 14 sediment samples were statistically significantly different from the control and below the minimum significant difference threshold for purple sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Sample collection was conducted by Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego in April 2004 at Submarine Base San Diego. |
||||
Data Reference: | Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base, San Diego, Draft Final Report. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The sample is consider toxic if there is statistically significant difference from the control and the minimum significant difference threshold is exceeded for the test species. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Sediment Site Assessment Study, Submarine Base, San Diego, Draft Final Report. | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Fourteen sampling stations were layed out in a grid pattern covering approximately 60 acres in around Piers November, Mike, and Sierra. Three of the stations are in the area originally listed as impaired on the current 303d list. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected in April 2004. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Sampling and analysis and quality assurance plans followed the general guidelines from previous San Diego Bay TMDL studies conducted by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, U.S. Navy, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||