Draft California 2026 Integrated Report (303(d) List/305(b) Report)

Supporting Information

Regional Board 6 - Lahontan Region

Water Body Name: East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
Water Body ID: CAR6301001020011204100242
Water Body Type: River & Stream
 
DECISION ID
161742
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Arsenic
Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Sources: A Source Unknown
TMDL Priority: Low
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for removal from the CWA section 303(d) List under section 4.1 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

12 lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess pollutant. 6 of the 34 samples exceed the MUN objective (MCL). 0 of 19 samples exceed the CTR criteria for the protection of aquatic life.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. 6 of the 34 samples exceed the MUN objective (MCL) and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161742, Arsenic
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337483
 
Pollutant: Arsenic
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Arsenic.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for arsenic incorporated by reference in the Basin Plan is 0.010 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161742, Arsenic
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 341091
 
Pollutant: Arsenic
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 6
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Arsenic.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for arsenic incorporated by reference in the Basin Plan is 0.010 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-12 and 2017-10-03
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161742, Arsenic
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 341112
 
Pollutant: Arsenic
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 6
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Arsenic.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for arsenic incorporated by reference in the Basin Plan is 0.010 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-12 and 2017-10-03
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161742, Arsenic
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337481
 
Pollutant: Arsenic
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Arsenic.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The dissolved arsenic criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 150 ug/L. The conversion factor used to convert the total fraction criterion for arsenic to dissolved fraction criterion is 1. Therefore all data was considered to be representative of the dissolved fraction. (California Toxics Rule, 2000)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161742, Arsenic
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 341132
 
Pollutant: Arsenic
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 6
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Arsenic.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The dissolved arsenic criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 150 ug/L. The conversion factor used to convert the total fraction criterion for arsenic to dissolved fraction criterion is 1. Therefore all data was considered to be representative of the dissolved fraction. (California Toxics Rule, 2000)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-12 and 2017-10-03
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161742, Arsenic
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337482
 
Pollutant: Arsenic
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Arsenic.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for arsenic incorporated by reference in the Basin Plan is 0.010 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161742, Arsenic
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5031
 
Pollutant: Arsenic
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled arsenic under the Region 6 SWAMP program. Concentrations of total arsenic in four samples ranged from 3 to 18 ug/L. One sample exceeded the California MCL.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The MCL for arsenic is 10 ug/L (effective November 28, 2008).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. Arsenic in this watershed is from natural sources.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161742, Arsenic
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99067
 
Pollutant: Arsenic
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed STORET data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Arsenic.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The dissolved arsenic criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater for dissolved arsenic is 150 ug/L. The maximum concentration (1-hr average) is 340 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). This data was compared to the more protective, 4-Day average of 150 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-03-09 and 2012-08-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QAPP not required for federal data
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161742, Arsenic
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99037
 
Pollutant: Arsenic
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed STORET data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Arsenic.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for arsenic incorporated by reference in the Basin Plan is 0.010 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-03-09 and 2012-08-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QAPP not required for federal data
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161742, Arsenic
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99079
 
Pollutant: Arsenic
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed STORET data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Arsenic.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The dissolved arsenic criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater for dissolved arsenic is 150 ug/L. The maximum concentration (1-hr average) is 340 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). This data was compared to the more protective, 4-Day average of 150 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-03-09 and 2012-08-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QAPP not required for federal data
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161742, Arsenic
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5030
 
Pollutant: Arsenic
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled arsenic under the Region 6 SWAMP program. Dissolved arsenic concentrations in four samples ranged from 2 to 18 ug/L. The CTR standards were not exceeded.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Toxics Rule (CTR) standards for protection of freshwater aquatic life are as follows:
4-day average = 150 ug/L
1- hour average = 340 ug/L
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout. Arsenic in this watershed is from natural sources.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161742, Arsenic
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99026
 
Pollutant: Arsenic
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed STORET data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Arsenic.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for arsenic incorporated by reference in the Basin Plan is 0.010 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-03-09 and 2012-08-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QAPP not required for federal data
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
 
DECISION ID
161781
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Manganese
Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Sources: A Source Unknown
TMDL Priority: Low
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for removal from the CWA section 303(d) List under section 4.2 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

Six lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess pollutant. 18 of 22 samples exceed the guideline for MUN and zero of four samples exceed the evaluation guideline for COLD.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. 18 of 22 samples exceed the guideline for MUN and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.2 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161781, Manganese
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337642
 
Pollutant: Manganese
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 3
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Manganese.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region?s Objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply uses of inland surface waters states that waters designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL). The secondary maximum contaminant level listed in Table 64449-A for Manganese is 0.05 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161781, Manganese
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 341431
 
Pollutant: Manganese
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 6
Number of Exceedances: 6
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 6 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Manganese.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region?s Objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply uses of inland surface waters states that waters designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL). The secondary maximum contaminant level listed in Table 64449-A for Manganese is 0.05 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-12 and 2017-10-03
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161781, Manganese
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99047
 
Pollutant: Manganese
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 4
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed STORET data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 4 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Manganese.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region¦s Objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply uses of inland surface waters states that waters designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL). The secondary maximum contaminant level listed in Table 64449-A for Manganese is 0.05 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-03-09 and 2012-08-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QAPP not required for federal data
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161781, Manganese
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5085
 
Pollutant: Manganese
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 4
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled manganese under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Total manganese concentrations in 4 samples ranged from 82 to 119 ug/L. All four samples exceeded the MCL.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The secondary MCL for manganese is 50 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161781, Manganese
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7711
 
Pollutant: Manganese
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled manganese under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Concentrations of dissolved manganese in four samples ranged from 11.6 to 36.5 ug/L.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: There are no state or federal standards or criteria for manganese for the protection of aquatic life.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161781, Manganese
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337640
 
Pollutant: Manganese
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Manganese.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region?s Objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply uses of inland surface waters states that waters designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL). The secondary maximum contaminant level listed in Table 64449-A for Manganese is 0.05 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-12-02 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
169156
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Nitrogen
Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Sources: A Source Unknown
TMDL Priority: Low
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for removal from the CWA section 303(d) List under section 4.1 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

Five lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess pollutant. Nine of the 16 samples exceed the objective.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. Nine of 16 samples exceeded the objective and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169156, Nitrogen
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 34531
 
Pollutant: Total Nitrogen as N
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The two samples collected could not be compared to a water quality objective.
Data Reference: RWB6 Trend Monitoring CY2006 CY2007
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: There is no site-specific numerical objective in the Lahontan Basin Plan for Total Nitrogen for this segment. The regionwide narrative objective for biostimulatory substances states: "Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect the water for beneficial uses."
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: Samples were collected at East Walker River, at CA/NV state line (630EWK001).
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected on August and November 2007.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: 2002 QAMP (Quality Assurance Management Plan) for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169156, Nitrogen
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 96960
 
Pollutant: Total Nitrogen as N
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 3
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Data were collected by the Nevada Department of Environmental Protection at one site on the East Fork Walker River at the state line (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001) between 2011 and 2013. Concentrations in the raw data ranged from 0.4 to 1.1 mg/L. Three annual averages were computed and all of them exceeded the water quality objective.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The site specific objective for total nitrogen in the East Walker River, as referenced in the Lahontan Basin Plan table 3-15, is an annual average concentration not to exceed 0.50 mg/L. While this objective is written to apply to waters upstream of Bridgeport Reservoir, it is being used to assess the waters downstream of the reservoir in recognition of the East Walker River as an interstate water which provides critical water resources to western Nevada.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: Data were collected by the Nevada Department of Environmental Protection from one location (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001) located near the CA/NV state boundary.
Temporal Representation: Data were collected between March 2011 and October 2013 on an irregular basis.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: These are data from the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database that do not require a QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169156, Nitrogen
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 343137
 
Pollutant: Total Nitrogen as N
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows:
1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrogen, Total
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Basin Plan objective for Nitrogen, Total in this water body is 0.5 (mg/L), (as a Mean).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Walker River ~1mi below Murphy Pond (630PS0163)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-06-15 and 2015-06-15
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169156, Nitrogen
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 343055
 
Pollutant: Total Nitrogen as N
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows:
1 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrogen, Total
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Basin Plan objective for Nitrogen, Total in this water body is 0.5 (mg/L), (as a Mean).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Walker River, at CA/NV state line (630EWK001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-17 and 2021-11-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169156, Nitrogen
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 96895
 
Pollutant: Total Nitrogen as N
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 6
Number of Exceedances: 4
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Data were collected as part of regional routine SWAMP monitoring. Data were collected from one site between 2010 and 2015. Concentrations in the raw data ranged from 0.231 to 1.22 mg/L. Six annual averages were computed, four of which exceeded the water quality objective in 2010, 2012, 2013 and 2015.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water).
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The site specific objective for total nitrogen in the East Walker River, as referenced in the Lahontan Basin Plan table 3-15, is an annual average concentration not to exceed 0.5 mg/L. While this objective is written to apply to waters above Bridgeport Reservoir it has been used to assess the waters below the reservoir in recognition of the East Walker River as an interstate water which provides critical water resources to western Nevada.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: Data were collected from one location, 630EWK001, which is located just upstream of the CA/NV state boundary.
Temporal Representation: Data were collected between October 2010 and October 2015 predominantly once per quarter.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data were collected in accordance with the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
 
DECISION ID
161791
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Oxygen, Dissolved
Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Sources: A Source Unknown
TMDL Priority: Low
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for removal from the CWA section 303(d) List under section 4.2 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

Eleven lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this parameter: 7 which assess dissolved oxygen concentration data and 4 which assess dissolved oxygen percent saturation data. Five of 71 samples are below the objective for minimum dissolved oxygen concentration. Eleven of 44 samples are below the objective for minimum dissolved oxygen percent saturation.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. Eleven of 44 samples are below the objective for minimum dissolved oxygen percent saturation and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.2 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161791, Oxygen, Dissolved
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5815
 
Pollutant: Dissolved oxygen saturation
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use: Fish Spawning
 
Number of Samples: 6
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey measured percent saturation of dissolved oxygen quarterly between November 2003 and August 2005 under the Region 6 SWAMP program. Percent saturation in 6 measurements ranged from 88 to 119 percent. The objective was not violated.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Lahontan Basin Plan's narrative objective states that percent saturation shall not be depressed by more than 10 percent and minimum dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be less than 80 percent saturation.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, the East Walker River near state line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Six quarterly measurements were taken between November 2003 and August 2006.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161791, Oxygen, Dissolved
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 44403
 
Pollutant: Dissolved oxygen saturation
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 3
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 5 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Saturation.
Data Reference: RWB6 Trend Monitoring CY2006 CY2007
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region's water quality objective states that the dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be less than 80 percent of saturation.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: Data for this line of evidence for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir was collected at 1 monitoring site [ East Walker River, at CA/NV state line]
Temporal Representation: Data was collected over the time period 8/14/2007-12/26/2007.
Environmental Conditions: Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information: 2002 QAMP (Quality Assurance Management Plan) for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161791, Oxygen, Dissolved
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 339313
 
Pollutant: Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 19
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 19 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved.
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: For waters with the beneficial uses of COLD, COLD with SPWN, WARM, and WARM with SPWN, the minimum dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be less than that specified in Table 3-6. (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630EWK001 (East Walker River, at CA/NV state line).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-22 and 2022-06-01
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161791, Oxygen, Dissolved
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337707
 
Pollutant: Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 10
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 10 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: For waters with the beneficial uses of COLD, COLD with SPWN, WARM, and WARM with SPWN, the minimum dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be less than that specified in Table 3-6. (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-10 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161791, Oxygen, Dissolved
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 339409
 
Pollutant: Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 19
Number of Exceedances: 3
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 19 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Saturation.
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region's water quality objective states that the dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be less than 80 percent of saturation.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630EWK001 (East Walker River, at CA/NV state line).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-22 and 2022-06-01
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161791, Oxygen, Dissolved
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 339032
 
Pollutant: Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved.
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: For waters with the beneficial uses of COLD, COLD with SPWN, WARM, and WARM with SPWN, the minimum dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be less than that specified in Table 3-6. (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630PS0163 (East Walker River ~1mi below Murphy Pond).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-06-15 and 2015-06-15
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161791, Oxygen, Dissolved
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 130101
 
Pollutant: Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 15
Number of Exceedances: 5
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 5 of 15 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Oxygen, Saturation.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water).
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region's water quality objective states that the dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be less than 80 percent of saturation.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (630EWK001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-09-13 and 2013-06-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161791, Oxygen, Dissolved
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 130019
 
Pollutant: Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 15
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 15 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Oxygen, Dissolved.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water).
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: For waters with the beneficial uses of COLD, COLD with SPWN, WARM, and WARM with SPWN, the minimum dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be less than that specified in Table 3-6. (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (630EWK001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-09-13 and 2013-06-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161791, Oxygen, Dissolved
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 32270
 
Pollutant: Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: One sample was below the 1 day minimum.
Data Reference: RWB6 Trend Monitoring CY2006 CY2007
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The objective from Lahontan Basin Plan Table 3-6 with both cold and spawn beneficial uses shall not be less than a one-day minimum dissolved oxygen concentration of 8 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: Data were collected at the following station: 630EWK001-East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected between August and December 2007
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: 2002 QAMP (Quality Assurance Management Plan) for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161791, Oxygen, Dissolved
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 130033
 
Pollutant: Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 6
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed STORET data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Oxygen, Dissolved.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: For waters with the beneficial uses of COLD, COLD with SPWN, WARM, and WARM with SPWN, the minimum dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be less than that specified in Table 3-6. (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-03-09 and 2012-08-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QAPP not required for federal data
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161791, Oxygen, Dissolved
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5731
 
Pollutant: Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use: Fish Spawning
 
Number of Samples: 15
Number of Exceedances: 4
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey measured dissolved oxygen quarterly between 2001 and 2005 under the Region 6 SWAMP program. Dissolved oxygen concentrations in 15 samples ranged from 7.1 to 12 mg/L. Four of 15 samples were below the 8 mg/L minimum concentration.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: For waters designated for the COLD and SPWN beneficial uses the 1- day minimum objective is 8 mg/L (Lahontan Basin Plan Table 3-6)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, the East Walker River near state line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Fifteen quarterly samples were collected between August 2002 and August 2005.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
163605
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Phosphorus
Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Sources: A Source Unknown
TMDL Priority: Low
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for removal from the CWA section 303(d) List under section 4.1 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

11 lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess pollutant. 17 of the 43 samples exceed the site-specific objective.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. 7 of the 43 samples exceed the site-specific objective and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163605, Phosphorus
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 343577
 
Pollutant: Phosphorus
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 2
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows:
2 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Phosphorus as P
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Basin Plan objective for Phosphorus as P in this water body is 0.06 (mg/L), (as a Mean).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Fork Walker River @ Stateline (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-02-08
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163605, Phosphorus
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5049
 
Pollutant: Phosphorus
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 15
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological survey sampled the East Walker River under the Region 6 SWAMP program, at quarterly intervals between 2001 and 2005. Concentrations of total P in 15 samples ranged from 0.036 to 0.37 mg/L. No biological data are available for assessment of compliance with the objective for biostimulatory substances.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: There are no site specific numerical objectives for phosphorus for this segment. The regionwide narrative objective for biostimulatory substances states:

"Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect the water for beneficial uses."
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Fifteen quarterly samples were taken between 2001 and 2005.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163605, Phosphorus
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 96959
 
Pollutant: Phosphorus
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 3
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Data were collected by the Nevada Department of Environmental Protection at one site on the East Fork Walker River at the state line (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001) between 2011 and 2013. Concentrations in the raw data ranged from 0.03 to 0.26 mg/L. Three annual averages were computed and all of them exceeded the water quality objective.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The site specific objective for total phosphorous in the East Walker River, as referenced in the Lahontan Basin Plan table 3-15, is an annual average concentration not to exceed 0.06 mg/L. While this objective is written to apply to waters upstream of Bridgeport Reservoir, it is being used to assess the waters downstream of the reservoir in recognition of the East Walker River as an interstate water which provides critical water resources to western Nevada.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: Data were collected by the Nevada Department of Environmental Protection from one location (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001) located near the CA/NV state boundary.
Temporal Representation: Data were collected between March 2011 and October 2013 on an irregular basis.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: These are data from the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database that do not require a QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163605, Phosphorus
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 27683
 
Pollutant: Phosphorus
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey collected monthly samples at the gaging station below Bridgeport Reservoir between April 2000 and February 2001. The mean concentrations of these 11 samples was 0.083 mg/L. The mean annual cocentration in nine USGS samples for 2000 was 0.094 mg/L.
Data Reference: Administrative Record of Lahontan RWQCB's 2001-2002 Section 303(d) List Update Process Resolution R6T-2002-0002
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The site-specific water quality objective used in the 2002 listing of the East Walker River included an annual mean total phosphorus concentration of 0.06 mg/L and a 90th percentile value of 0.10 mg/L. This objective actually applies to a station upstream of Bridgeport Reservoir.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: Samples were collected at the USGS gaging station below Bridgeport Reservoir.
Temporal Representation: Eleven samples were collected monthly between April 2000 and February 2001.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Sampling and analysis were done according to the SWAMP QAPP. However, in July 2009 an error was discovered in the QAPP related to holding times for total phosphorus samples that affects the validity of data for the Lahontan Region The holding time for samples that are not acid-preserved.should be 48 hours rather than 28 days as indicated in the QAPP. "Low level" phosphorus analyses, without acid preservation, are used in the Lahontan Region's SWAMP program. .
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163605, Phosphorus
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 34530
 
Pollutant: Phosphorus
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The annual average for 2007 exceeds the water quality objective for Total Phosphorus. Total Phosphorus was calculated by summing Orthophosphate as P and Phosphorus as P data. Phosphorus as P data were averaged when they were collected on the same day. 2 pairs were summed and then averaged for 2007 before comparing with the Total Phosphorus annual average objective.
Data Reference: RWB6 Trend Monitoring CY2006 CY2007
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Table 3-15 of the Basin Plan states that the water quality objective for Total P for East Walker River below Bridgeport Reservoir is 0.06 mg/L as an annual average.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: Samples were collected at East Walker River, at CA/NV state line (630EWK001).
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected on August and November 2007.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: 2002 QAMP (Quality Assurance Management Plan) for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163605, Phosphorus
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 96896
 
Pollutant: Phosphorus
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 6
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Data were collected as part of regional routine SWAMP monitoring. Data were collected from one site between 2010 and 2015. Concentrations in the raw data ranged from 0.005 to 0.104 mg/L. Six annual averages were computed, none of which exceeded the water quality objective.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water).
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The site specific objective for total phosphorous in the East Walker River, as referenced in the Lahontan Basin Plan table 3-15, is an annual average concentration not to exceed 0.06 mg/L. While this objective is written to apply to waters above Bridgeport Reservoir it has been used to assess the waters below the reservoir in recognition of the East Walker River as an interstate water which provides critical water resources to western Nevada.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: Data were collected from one location, 630EWK001, which is located just upstream of the CA/NV state boundary.
Temporal Representation: Data were collected between October 2010 and October 2015 predominantly once per quarter.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data were collected in accordance with the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163605, Phosphorus
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 343578
 
Pollutant: Phosphorus
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows:
0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Phosphorus as P
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Basin Plan objective for Phosphorus as P in this water body is 0.06 (mg/L), (as a Mean).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Fork Walker River @ Stateline (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-02-08
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163605, Phosphorus
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 343217
 
Pollutant: Phosphorus
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows:
1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Phosphorus as P
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Basin Plan objective for Phosphorus as P in this water body is 0.06 (mg/L), (as a Mean).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Walker River ~1mi below Murphy Pond (630PS0163)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-06-15 and 2015-06-15
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163605, Phosphorus
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 343198
 
Pollutant: Phosphorus
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 5
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows:
5 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Phosphorus as P
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Basin Plan objective for Phosphorus as P in this water body is 0.06 (mg/L), (as a Mean).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Walker River, at CA/NV state line (630EWK001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-17 and 2021-11-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163605, Phosphorus
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 343576
 
Pollutant: Phosphorus
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows:
1 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Phosphorus as P
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Basin Plan objective for Phosphorus as P in this water body is 0.06 (mg/L), (as a Mean).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Fork Walker River @ Stateline (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-10 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163605, Phosphorus
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 343670
 
Pollutant: Phosphorus
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 3
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows:
3 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Phosphorus as P
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Basin Plan objective for Phosphorus as P in this water body is 0.06 (mg/L), (as a Mean).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Fork Walker River @ Stateline (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-01-22 and 2017-10-03
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161804
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Turbidity
Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Sources: A Source Unknown
TMDL Priority: Low
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for removal from the CWA section 303(d) List under section 4.2 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

10 lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 25 of the 105 samples exceed the MUN water quality objective (MCL).

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. 25 of 105 samples exceeded the MUN water quality objective (MCL) and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.2 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161804, Turbidity
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337782
 
Pollutant: Turbidity
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 8
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 8 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Water designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) based upon drinking water standards specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. The Lahontan Basin Plan also has regionwide turbidity objective for other beneficial uses that states: Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect the water for beneficial uses. Increases in turbidity shall not exceed natural levels by more than 10%.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient surface waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's 'Chemical Constituents' objective. The Secondary MCL for turbidity is 5 NTU. Calculation of a numeric objective for other beneficial uses requires comparison with upstream or other background data which may not be available as part of the data used for water quality assessment.
Guideline Reference: California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15. Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-10 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161804, Turbidity
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 341972
 
Pollutant: Turbidity
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 12
Number of Exceedances: 3
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 12 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Water designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) based upon drinking water standards specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. The Lahontan Basin Plan also has regionwide turbidity objective for other beneficial uses that states: Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect the water for beneficial uses. Increases in turbidity shall not exceed natural levels by more than 10%.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient surface waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's 'Chemical Constituents' objective. The Secondary MCL for turbidity is 5 NTU. Calculation of a numeric objective for other beneficial uses requires comparison with upstream or other background data which may not be available as part of the data used for water quality assessment.
Guideline Reference: California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15. Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-01-22 and 2017-10-03
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161804, Turbidity
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7718
 
Pollutant: Turbidity
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey measured turbidity under the Region 6 SWAMP program at quarterly intervals between 2004 and 2005. Turbidity in 4 samples ranged from 2 to 4.2 NTRU. Since the MCL is expressed as NTU these samples cannot be used to assess compliance.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The MCL for turbidity is 5 NTU.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four samples reported as NTRU were collected quarterly between 2004 and 2005.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161804, Turbidity
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99085
 
Pollutant: Turbidity
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 6
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed STORET data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Turbidity.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Water designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) based upon drinking water standards specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. The Lahontan Basin Plan also has regionwide turbidity objective for other beneficial uses that states: Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect the water for beneficial uses. Increases in turbidity shall not exceed natural levels by more than 10%.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient surface waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's \Chemical Constituents\" objective. The Secondary MCL for turbidity is 5 NTU. Calculation of a numeric objective for other beneficial uses requires comparison with upstream or other background data which may not be available as part of the data used for water quality assessment. "
Guideline Reference: California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15. Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-03-09 and 2012-08-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QAPP not required for federal data
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161804, Turbidity
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 340897
 
Pollutant: Turbidity
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity.
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Water designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) based upon drinking water standards specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. The Lahontan Basin Plan also has regionwide turbidity objective for other beneficial uses that states: Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect the water for beneficial uses. Increases in turbidity shall not exceed natural levels by more than 10%.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient surface waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's 'Chemical Constituents' objective. The Secondary MCL for turbidity is 5 NTU. Calculation of a numeric objective for other beneficial uses requires comparison with upstream or other background data which may not be available as part of the data used for water quality assessment.
Guideline Reference: California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15. Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630PS0163 (East Walker River ~1mi below Murphy Pond).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-06-15 and 2015-06-15
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161804, Turbidity
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5057
 
Pollutant: Turbidity
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 12
Number of Exceedances: 9
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey measured turbidity under the Region 6 SWAMP program at quarterly intervals between 2001 and 2004. Turbidity in 12 samples ranged from below the detection level to 12 NTU. The MCL was exceeded in 9 of the 12 samples.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The MCL for turbidity is 5 NTU.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Twelve samples reported as NTU were collected quarterly between 2001 to 2004.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161804, Turbidity
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5056
 
Pollutant: Turbidity
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 12
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey measured turbidity under the Region 6 SWAMP program at quarterly intervals between 2001 and 2004. Twelve turbidity samples reported as NTU ranged from below the detection level to 12 NTU.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The applicable objective in the Lahontan Basin Plan states: "Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect the water for beneficial uses. Increases in turbidity shall not exceed natural levels by more than 10 percent."
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Twelve samples reported as NTU were collected quarterly from 2001 to 2004.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161804, Turbidity
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7717
 
Pollutant: Turbidity
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey measured turbidity under the Region 6 SWAMP program at quarterly intervals between 2004 and 2005. Turbidity in 4 samples ranged from 2 to 4.2 NTRU.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The applicable objective in the Lahontan Basin Plan states: "Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect the water for beneficial uses. Increases in turbidity shall not exceed natural levels by more than 10 percent."
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four samples reported as NTU were collected quarterly in 2004 and 2005.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161804, Turbidity
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 340949
 
Pollutant: Turbidity
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 18
Number of Exceedances: 3
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 18 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity.
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Water designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) based upon drinking water standards specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. The Lahontan Basin Plan also has regionwide turbidity objective for other beneficial uses that states: Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect the water for beneficial uses. Increases in turbidity shall not exceed natural levels by more than 10%.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient surface waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's 'Chemical Constituents' objective. The Secondary MCL for turbidity is 5 NTU. Calculation of a numeric objective for other beneficial uses requires comparison with upstream or other background data which may not be available as part of the data used for water quality assessment.
Guideline Reference: California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15. Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630EWK001 (East Walker River, at CA/NV state line).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-17 and 2022-06-01
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161804, Turbidity
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 96866
 
Pollutant: Turbidity
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 44
Number of Exceedances: 9
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Data were collected by Lahontan staff for the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) RWB6 Monitoring program, and for a supplemental TMDL Integrated Report Special Study. The TMDL Special Study was developed by Lahontan Planning and SWAMP staff to provide additional data to the quarterly SWAMP monitoring. The purpose was to gain a better temporal understanding of levels of specific pollutants in the waterbody. To ensure the two datasets could be viably analyzed as one, the TMDL Special Study followed the same sampling protocol as SWAMP. Accordingly, the two datasets have been combined for this assessment to reflect the intended design and to best characterize conditions in the watershed. Data for the projects were collected between September 2010 and March 2017. Turbidity concentrations ranged from 1.25 to 8.67 NTU.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water).
  Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the TMDL Intergrated Report Special Study.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The MCL for turbidity is 5 NTU.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: Data were collected from one monitoring location, 630EWK001, which is located just upstream of the CA/NV stateline.
Temporal Representation: Data were collected between September 2010 and March 2017 with predominately a twice-per-quarter frequency. More visits were made to the site in the warmer months compared with winter months.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
 
DECISION ID
161806
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: 2, 4 DB / 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) butyric acid
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161806, 2, 4 DB / 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) butyric acid
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337573
 
Pollutant: 2, 4 DB / 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) butyric acid
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Dichlorophenoxybutyric Acid, 2,4-.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for 2, 4 DB / 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) butyric acid is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 83 ug/L for a vascular plant (acute).
Guideline Reference: OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161806, 2, 4 DB / 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) butyric acid
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337572
 
Pollutant: 2, 4 DB / 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) butyric acid
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Dichlorophenoxybutyric Acid, 2,4-.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The USEPA expected safe lifetime exposure limit in drinking water for 2,4-Dichlorophenoxybutyric Acid calculated using the IRIS Reference Dose, is 56 ug/L. This was calculated assuming 70 kg body weight, 2 liters/day water consumption, 20% relative source contribution from drinking water, and 0.008 mg/kg/day as the reference dose.
Guideline Reference: IRIS Reference Summary (Various Pollutants)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161789
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: 2,4-D (2,4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid)
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161789, 2,4-D (2,4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337571
 
Pollutant: 2,4-D (2,4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid, 2,4-.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for 2,4-D for the protection of human health from the consumtion of organisms only is 1300 ug/L (National Recommended Water Quality Criteria 2016)
Guideline Reference: National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016.
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161789, 2,4-D (2,4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337570
 
Pollutant: 2,4-D (2,4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid, 2,4-.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid, 2,4- is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 299.2 ug/L for a vascular plant (acute).
Guideline Reference: OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161789, 2,4-D (2,4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337569
 
Pollutant: 2,4-D (2,4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid, 2,4-.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for 2, 4-D incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 70 ug/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161792
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161792, 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337585
 
Pollutant: 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Dinitrotoluene, 2,4-.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The 2, 4-Dinitrotoluene criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of organisms only is 9.1 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2019-12-16
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161792, 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337586
 
Pollutant: 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Dinitrotoluene, 2,4-.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The 2, 4-Dinitrotoluene criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.11 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2019-12-16
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161745
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Acifluorfen
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161745, Acifluorfen
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337438
 
Pollutant: Acifluorfen
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Acifluorfen.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for acifluorfen is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 355 ug/L for nonvascular plants for sodium acifluorfen .
Guideline Reference: OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161817
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Alachlor
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161817, Alachlor
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337439
 
Pollutant: Alachlor
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alachlor.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for alachlor incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 2 ug/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161817, Alachlor
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337440
 
Pollutant: Alachlor
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alachlor.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for alachlor is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 1.64 ug/L for a nonvascular plant (acute).
Guideline Reference: OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161820
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Aldicarb
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161820, Aldicarb
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337441
 
Pollutant: Aldicarb
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Aldicarb.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The USEPA Health Advisory for lifetime exposure to aldicarb as a drinking water level is a concentration of 0.007 mg/L.
Guideline Reference: 2018 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161820, Aldicarb
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337442
 
Pollutant: Aldicarb
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Aldicarb. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for aldicarb is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.46 ug/L for a fish (chronic).
Guideline Reference: OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161820, Aldicarb
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337444
 
Pollutant: Aldicarb
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Aldicarb. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for aldicarb is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.46 ug/L for a fish (chronic).
Guideline Reference: OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161820, Aldicarb
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337443
 
Pollutant: Aldicarb
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Aldicarb.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The USEPA Health Advisory for lifetime exposure to aldicarb as a drinking water level is a concentration of 0.007 mg/L.
Guideline Reference: 2018 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161821
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Aldrin
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161821, Aldrin
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337445
 
Pollutant: Aldrin
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Aldrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The aldrin criterion for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.00013 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161821, Aldrin
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337446
 
Pollutant: Aldrin
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Aldrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The aldrin criterion for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.00014 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161821, Aldrin
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337447
 
Pollutant: Aldrin
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Aldrin.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The aldrin criterion maximum concentration (expressed as a 1-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 1.5 ug/L. The criterion of 3 ug/L provided in the California Toxics Rule is an instantaneous maximum concentration and was divided by 2 in order to better represent a criterion maximum concentration (CMC) value as specified in footnote (g) of Table (b)(1) of the California Toxics Rule (2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161821, Aldrin
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99185
 
Pollutant: Aldrin
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Aldrin. Data were collected for 1 fish species (1 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 5 fish per composite).
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: National Academy of Science guidelines (NAS 1972) establish a maximum Aldrin concentration of 100 ug/Kg (wet weight) in tissue samples for protection of aquatic life from bioaccumulation of toxic substances.
Guideline Reference: National Academy of Sciences. Water Quality Criteria 1972. EPA-R3-73-033. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
 
DECISION ID
161822
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Alkalinity as CaCO3
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

Five lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 65 samples exceed the guideline for alkalinity.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. Zero of 65 samples exceeded the guideline and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161822, Alkalinity as CaCO3
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 98181
 
Pollutant: Alkalinity as CaCO3
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 26
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 26 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Alkalinity as CaCO3.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water).
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Alkalinity as CaCO3 for the protection of freshwater aquatic life is not less than 20000 ug/L. (National Recommended Water Quality Criteria 2016)
Objective/Criterion Reference: National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016.
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (630EWK001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-09-13 and 2015-10-15
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161822, Alkalinity as CaCO3
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337849
 
Pollutant: Alkalinity as CaCO3
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 20
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 20 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3.
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average).
Guideline Reference: National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016.
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630EWK001 (East Walker River, at CA/NV state line).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-17 and 2022-06-01
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161822, Alkalinity as CaCO3
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 341010
 
Pollutant: Alkalinity as CaCO3
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 12
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 12 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average).
Guideline Reference: National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016.
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-01-22 and 2017-10-03
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161822, Alkalinity as CaCO3
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99039
 
Pollutant: Alkalinity as CaCO3
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 6
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed STORET data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Alkalinity as CaCO3.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Alkalinity as CaCO3 for the protection of freshwater aquatic life is not less than 20000 ug/L. (National Recommended Water Quality Criteria 2016)
Objective/Criterion Reference: National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016.
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-03-09 and 2012-08-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QAPP not required for federal data
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161822, Alkalinity as CaCO3
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337873
 
Pollutant: Alkalinity as CaCO3
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3.
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average).
Guideline Reference: National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016.
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630PS0163 (East Walker River ~1mi below Murphy Pond).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-06-15 and 2015-06-15
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
 
DECISION ID
161826
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Aluminum
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for removal from the CWA section 303(d) List under section 4.1 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

Nine lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess pollutant. 0 of the 17 samples exceeded the COLD criteria. One of 17 samples exceeds the MUN objective (secondary MCL).

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. 0 of the 17 samples exceeded the COLD criteria. One of 17 samples exceeds the MUN objective (secondary MCL) and does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161826, Aluminum
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 348111
 
Pollutant: Aluminum
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed 2007 RWB6 SWAMP East Walker River HU data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Aluminum.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The aluminum criterion for the protection of aquatic life, is pH, total hardness, and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) dependent. When total hardness or DOC data were not available, default values based on the level III ecoregions developed by U.S EPA were substituted (EPA, 2018). When pH data were not available, the median pH value for the ecoregion, a pH value from a comparable waterbody, or a pH value from a local study in the same waterbody was used as a comparable surrogate.
Guideline Reference: Final Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Aluminum. EPA-822-R-18-001. Washington, D.C.: Office of Water, USEPA.
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630EWK001 (East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2001-08-16 and 2002-06-28
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161826, Aluminum
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5065
 
Pollutant: Aluminum
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological survey sampled aluminum under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Total recoverable aluminum concentrations in four samples ranged from 59 to 110 ug/L. The state MCLs were not exceeded.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The primary MCL for aluminum is 1000 ug/L and the secondary MCL is 200 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161826, Aluminum
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337452
 
Pollutant: Aluminum
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Aluminum.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region for aluminum is 0.2 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161826, Aluminum
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337454
 
Pollutant: Aluminum
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Aluminum.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region for aluminum is 0.2 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161826, Aluminum
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337455
 
Pollutant: Aluminum
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Aluminum.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The aluminum criterion for the protection of aquatic life, is pH, total hardness, and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) dependent. When total hardness or DOC data were not available, default values based on the level III ecoregions developed by U.S EPA were substituted (EPA, 2018). When pH data were not available, the median pH value for the ecoregion, a pH value from a comparable waterbody, or a pH value from a local study in the same waterbody was used as a comparable surrogate.
Guideline Reference: Final Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Aluminum. EPA-822-R-18-001. Washington, D.C.: Office of Water, USEPA.
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161826, Aluminum
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 348102
 
Pollutant: Aluminum
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed 2007 RWB6 SWAMP East Walker River HU data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Aluminum.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region for aluminum is 0.2 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630EWK001 (East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2001-08-16 and 2002-06-28
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161826, Aluminum
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 348110
 
Pollutant: Aluminum
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed 2007 RWB6 SWAMP East Walker River HU data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Aluminum.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The aluminum criterion for the protection of aquatic life, is pH, total hardness, and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) dependent. When total hardness or DOC data were not available, default values based on the level III ecoregions developed by U.S EPA were substituted (EPA, 2018). When pH data were not available, the median pH value for the ecoregion, a pH value from a comparable waterbody, or a pH value from a local study in the same waterbody was used as a comparable surrogate.
Guideline Reference: Final Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Aluminum. EPA-822-R-18-001. Washington, D.C.: Office of Water, USEPA.
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630EWK001 (East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2001-08-16 and 2002-06-28
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161826, Aluminum
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337453
 
Pollutant: Aluminum
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Aluminum.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The aluminum criterion for the protection of aquatic life, is pH, total hardness, and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) dependent. When total hardness or DOC data were not available, default values based on the level III ecoregions developed by U.S EPA were substituted (EPA, 2018). When pH data were not available, the median pH value for the ecoregion, a pH value from a comparable waterbody, or a pH value from a local study in the same waterbody was used as a comparable surrogate.
Guideline Reference: Final Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Aluminum. EPA-822-R-18-001. Washington, D.C.: Office of Water, USEPA.
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161826, Aluminum
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 348114
 
Pollutant: Aluminum
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed 2007 RWB6 SWAMP East Walker River HU data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Aluminum.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region for aluminum is 0.2 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630EWK001 (East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2001-08-16 and 2002-06-28
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
 
DECISION ID
103814
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Anatoxin-A
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant that consists of a single tissue sample. Zero of one samples exceed the guideline for Anatoxin-a.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. Zero of one samples exceeded the guideline and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 103814, Anatoxin-A
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99633
 
Pollutant: Anatoxin-A
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Anatoxin-A. Data were collected for 1 fish species (1 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 5 fish per composite).
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The 5000 ng/g wet weight action level for Anatoxin-A for edible sport fish and shellfish identifies the maximum concentration of cyanotoxins that a typical consumer (one meal per week) could ingest without exceeding the reference dose.(OEHHA 2012)
Guideline Reference: Toxicological Summary and Suggested Action Levels to Reduce Potential Adverse Health Effects of Six Cyanotoxins
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
 
DECISION ID
161740
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Anthracene
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161740, Anthracene
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337460
 
Pollutant: Anthracene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Anthracene.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The anthracene criterion for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 110,000 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161740, Anthracene
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337461
 
Pollutant: Anthracene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Anthracene.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The anthracene criterion for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 9,600 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161741
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Antimony
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161741, Antimony
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7716
 
Pollutant: Antimony
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled antimony under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Four dissolved antimony samples all had concentrations below the detection limit. Per listing policy Section 6.1.5.5, the criteria are presumed to be attained.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The USEPA Lowest Observed Effect Levels (LOEL) criteria for protection of aquatic life include an acute antimony value of 9000 ug/L, a chronic value of 1600 ug/L and a limit for toxicity to algae of 610 ug/L
Objective/Criterion Reference: Compilation of Water Quality Goals
Objective/Criterion Reference: Quality Criteria for Water 1986. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Regulations and Standards. Washington D.C. EPA 440/5-86-001.
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161741, Antimony
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5122
 
Pollutant: Antimony
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological survey sampled antimony under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Four total antimony samples all had concentrations below the detection limit. Per listing policy Section 6.1.5.5, the MCL and CTR standard are presumed to be attained.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The California primary MCL for antimony is 6 ug/L. The California Toxics Rule water and fish consumption standard is 14 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161741, Antimony
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337474
 
Pollutant: Antimony
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Antimony.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Antimony criterion for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 4.3 mg/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-12-02 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161741, Antimony
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337475
 
Pollutant: Antimony
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Antimony.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). The USEPA Lowest Observed Effect Levels (LOEL) criteria for protection of aquatic life include an acute antimony value of 9000 ug/L, a chronic value of 1600 ug/L and a limit for toxicity to algae of 610 ug/L . This data were compared to the most protective value of 610 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The USEPA Quality Criteria for Water (Gold Book) states that for antimony toxicity to algae occurs at 610 ug/l. (USEPA, 1986)
Guideline Reference: Quality Criteria for Water 1986. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Regulations and Standards. Washington D.C. EPA 440/5-86-001.
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-12-02 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161741, Antimony
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337476
 
Pollutant: Antimony
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Antimony.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for antimony incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 0.006 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-12-02 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161741, Antimony
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337464
 
Pollutant: Antimony
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Antimony.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Antimony criterion for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 4.3 mg/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161741, Antimony
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337465
 
Pollutant: Antimony
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Antimony.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). The USEPA Lowest Observed Effect Levels (LOEL) criteria for protection of aquatic life include an acute antimony value of 9000 ug/L, a chronic value of 1600 ug/L and a limit for toxicity to algae of 610 ug/L . This data were compared to the most protective value of 610 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The USEPA Quality Criteria for Water (Gold Book) states that for antimony toxicity to algae occurs at 610 ug/l. (USEPA, 1986)
Guideline Reference: Quality Criteria for Water 1986. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Regulations and Standards. Washington D.C. EPA 440/5-86-001.
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161741, Antimony
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337466
 
Pollutant: Antimony
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Antimony.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for antimony incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 0.006 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161746
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Atrazine
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161746, Atrazine
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337490
 
Pollutant: Atrazine
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Atrazine.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for Atrazine is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of < 1 ug/L for a nonvascular plant (acute). The benchmark was derived from a 'less-than' value (for example, <1,500) and may underestimate toxicity.
Guideline Reference: OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161746, Atrazine
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337489
 
Pollutant: Atrazine
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Atrazine.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for atrazine incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 1 ug/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161747
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Barium
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

four lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 17 samples exceed the MUN water quality objective (MCL) for barium.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. Zero of the 17 samples exceed the MUN water quality objective (MCL) for barium and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161747, Barium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 341160
 
Pollutant: Barium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 6
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Barium.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for barium incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 1 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-12 and 2017-10-03
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161747, Barium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337495
 
Pollutant: Barium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Barium.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for barium incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 1 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-12-02 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161747, Barium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337496
 
Pollutant: Barium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Barium.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for barium incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 1 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161747, Barium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 98997
 
Pollutant: Barium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed STORET data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Barium.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for barium incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 1 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-03-09 and 2012-08-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QAPP not required for federal data
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
 
DECISION ID
161807
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Bentazon
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161807, Bentazon
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337497
 
Pollutant: Bentazon
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Bentazon.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for Bentazon incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 18 ug/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161807, Bentazon
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337498
 
Pollutant: Bentazon
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Bentazon.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for Bentazon is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 4,500 ug/L for a nonvascular plant (acute).
Guideline Reference: OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
171289
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Benthic Community Effects
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Benthic Community Effects are being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 3.9 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.9, additional lines of evidence (LOEs) associating the Benthic Community Effects decision with a water or sediment concentration of pollutants other than benthic-macroinvertebrate bioassessment or habitat assessment LOEs are necessary to place a water body on the 303(d) List for Benthic Community Effects.

Two lines of evidence evaluating benthic-macroinvertebrate bioassessment data are available in the administrative record to assess this indicator. Zero of two benthic-macroinvertebrate samples exceed the California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) impairment threshold. The available information indicates that the waterbody is likely unimpaired for Benthic Community Effects and therefore no other pollutant LOEs need be associated with this decision at this time. However, a minimum of two benthic-macroinvertebrate samples are needed to fully assess listing status.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is insufficient information to justify placement of Benthic Community Effects in this waterbody segment on the CWA section 303(d) List.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. Zero of two benthic-macroinvertebrate bioassessment samples had CSCI scores below 0.79. Therefore, this water body is not exceeding the water quality threshold for the protection of the COLD beneficial use. However, a minimum of two benthic-macroinvertebrate samples are needed to fully assess listing status.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 171289, Benthic Community Effects
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 96350
 
Pollutant: Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments
LOE Subgroup: Population/Community Degradation
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The site had a CSCI score of 0.83583581. This score indicates that this site is supporting aquatic life beneficial uses and that the water quality objective is met.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rhen, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use.
Guideline Reference: Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an index for consistent meaning in different settings
 
Spatial Representation: Samples collected at site 630PS0163.
Temporal Representation: Sample collected on 6/15/2015.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QAPP for SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 171289, Benthic Community Effects
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 352740
 
Pollutant: Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments
LOE Subgroup: Population/Community Degradation
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed data for 630PS0163 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard. CSCI scores were from 0.861201591 to 0.861201591 .
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Lahontan Basin Plan)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rhen, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use.)
Guideline Reference: Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an index for consistent meaning in different settings
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630PS0163 (East Walker River ~1mi below Murphy Pond).
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected from 2015-06-15 to 2015-06-15.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
 
DECISION ID
161748
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Benzo(a)pyrene
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161748, Benzo(a)pyrene
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337500
 
Pollutant: Benzo(a)pyrene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Benzo(a)pyrene.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The benzo(a)pyrene criterion for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.049 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161748, Benzo(a)pyrene
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337499
 
Pollutant: Benzo(a)pyrene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benzo(a)pyrene. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The benzo(a)pyrene criterion for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.0044 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161749
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161749, Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337502
 
Pollutant: Benzo[b]fluoranthene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Benzo(b)fluoranthene.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Benzo(b)fluoranthene criterion for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.049 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161749, Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337501
 
Pollutant: Benzo[b]fluoranthene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benzo(b)fluoranthene. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Benzo(b)Fluoranthene criterion for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.0044 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161750
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161750, Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337503
 
Pollutant: Benzo[k]fluoranthene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Benzo(k)fluoranthene. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Benzo(k)Fluoranthene criterion for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.0044 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161750, Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337504
 
Pollutant: Benzo[k]fluoranthene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Benzo(k)fluoranthene.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Benzo(k)Fluoranthene criterion for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.049 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161751
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Beryllium
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161751, Beryllium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337515
 
Pollutant: Beryllium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Beryllium.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for beryllium incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 0.004 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161751, Beryllium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337507
 
Pollutant: Beryllium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Beryllium.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The Gold Book states that beryllium chronic toxicity to freshwater aquatic life occur at concentrations as low as 5.3 ug/L.
Guideline Reference: Quality Criteria for Water 1986. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Regulations and Standards. Washington D.C. EPA 440/5-86-001.
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161751, Beryllium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337510
 
Pollutant: Beryllium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Beryllium.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for beryllium incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 0.004 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-12-02 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161751, Beryllium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337509
 
Pollutant: Beryllium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Beryllium.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The Gold Book states that beryllium chronic toxicity to freshwater aquatic life occur at concentrations as low as 5.3 ug/L.
Guideline Reference: Quality Criteria for Water 1986. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Regulations and Standards. Washington D.C. EPA 440/5-86-001.
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-12-02 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161751, Beryllium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5068
 
Pollutant: Beryllium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled beryllium under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Four total recoverable beryllium samples had reported concentrations less than the detection limit. Per listing policy Section 6.1.5.5, the MCL is presumed to be attained.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The MCL for beryllium is 4 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161751, Beryllium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5763
 
Pollutant: Beryllium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled beryllium quarterly in the East Walker River under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Four dissolved beryllium samples had reported concentrations below the detection level. Per listing policy Section 6.1.5.5, the objective is presumed to be attained.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA's) freshwater aquatic life criteria for beryllium are as follows: acute (1 hour average) criterion = 130 ug/L; chronic (4 day average) criterion = 5.3 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: National recommended water quality criteria: 2002. EPA-822-R-02-047 Washington, D.C. USEPA
Objective/Criterion Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
161752
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Bis(2ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP)
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161752, Bis(2ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337517
 
Pollutant: Bis(2ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 5.9 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161752, Bis(2ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337518
 
Pollutant: Bis(2ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 1.8 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
163603
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Boron
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163603, Boron
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7686
 
Pollutant: Boron
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled boron under the Region 6 SWAMP program, at quarterly intervals between 2002 and 2005. Boron concentrations in 9 samples ranged from 39 to 178 ug/L. The criterion was not exceeded.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California State Notification Level criterion for boron is 1000 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Drinking Water Notification and Response Levels: An Overview
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Nine quarterly samples were collected between 2002 and 2005.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout. Boron in this watershed is from natural sources.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163603, Boron
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 343542
 
Pollutant: Boron
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows:
0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Boron
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Basin Plan objective for Boron in this water body is 0.12 (mg/L), (as a Mean).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Fork Walker River @ Stateline (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163603, Boron
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 343605
 
Pollutant: Boron
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows:
1 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Boron
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Basin Plan objective for Boron in this water body is 0.12 (mg/L), (as a Mean).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Fork Walker River @ Stateline (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-12 and 2017-03-14
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163603, Boron
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 343545
 
Pollutant: Boron
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows:
0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Boron
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Basin Plan objective for Boron in this water body is 0.12 (mg/L), (as a Mean).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Fork Walker River @ Stateline (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-12-02 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163603, Boron
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 342706
 
Pollutant: Boron
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 6
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows:
0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Boron
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Basin Plan objective for Boron in this water body is 0.12 (mg/L), (as a Mean).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Walker River, at CA/NV state line (630EWK001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-17 and 2021-11-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163603, Boron
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 343543
 
Pollutant: Boron
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows:
0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Boron
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Basin Plan objective for Boron in this water body is 0.12 (mg/L), (as a Mean).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Fork Walker River @ Stateline (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-12-02 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163603, Boron
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 96893
 
Pollutant: Boron
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 6
Number of Exceedances: 2
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Data were collected as part of regional routine SWAMP monitoring. Data were collected from one site between 2010 and 2015. Concentrations in the raw data ranged from 0.0324 to 0.626 mg/L. Six annual averages were computed, two of which exceeded the water quality objective in 2014 and 2015.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water).
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The site specific objective for boron in the East Walker River, as referenced in the Lahontan Basin Plan table 3-15, is an annual average concentration not to exceed 0.12 mg/L. While this objective is written to apply to waters above Bridgeport Reservoir it has been used to assess the waters below the reservoir in recognition of the East Walker River as an interstate water which provides critical water resources to western Nevada.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: Data were collected from one location, 630EWK001, which is located just upstream of the CA/NV state boundary.
Temporal Representation: Data were collected between October 2010 and October 2015 predominantly once per quarter.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data were collected in accordance with the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163603, Boron
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 32242
 
Pollutant: Boron
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Zero of 2 samples exceeded the California State Notification Level criterion.
Data Reference: RWB6 Trend Monitoring CY2006 CY2007
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect the water for beneficial uses.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The California State Notification Level criterion for boron is 1 mg/L.
Guideline Reference: Drinking Water Notification Levels and Response Levels
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected at the following station: 630EWK001 East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected: 11/8/2007 8/14/2007
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: 2002 QAMP (Quality Assurance Management Plan) for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163603, Boron
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 343544
 
Pollutant: Boron
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows:
0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Boron
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Basin Plan objective for Boron in this water body is 0.12 (mg/L), (as a Mean).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Fork Walker River @ Stateline (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161808
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Bromacil
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161808, Bromacil
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337520
 
Pollutant: Bromacil
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Bromacil.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for Bromacil is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 6.8 ug/L for a nonvascular plant (acute).
Guideline Reference: OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161808, Bromacil
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337519
 
Pollutant: Bromacil
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Bromacil.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The USEPA Health Advisory for lifetime exposure to Bromacil as a drinking water level is a concentration of 0.07 mg/L
Guideline Reference: 2012 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161818
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Bromobenzene
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161818, Bromobenzene
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337521
 
Pollutant: Bromobenzene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Bromobenzene.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: USEPA's Drinking Water Health Advisory exposure limit for life-time exposure to Bromobenzen is a concentration of 0.06 mg/L
Guideline Reference: 2012 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-11-30 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161819
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Bromochloromethane
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161819, Bromochloromethane
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337522
 
Pollutant: Bromochloromethane
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Bromochloromethane.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: USEPA's Drinking Water Health advisory for life-time exposure to Bromochloromethane is a concentration of 0.09 mg/L
Guideline Reference: 2012 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-11-30 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161743
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Butachlor
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161743, Butachlor
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337523
 
Pollutant: Butachlor
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Butachlor.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The National Academy of Sciences Health Advisory for Butachlor is the lifetime suggested no-adverse effect level of 70 ug/L (National Acadamey of Sciences Summary Report: Drinking Water and Health, 1977).
Guideline Reference: National Academy of Sciences - Volume I Drinking Water and Health
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161753
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Cadmium
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161753, Cadmium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7689
 
Pollutant: Cadmium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological survey sampled cadmium under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 ad 2002. Four total cadmium samples had reported concentrations less than the detection limit. Per listing policy Section 6.1.5.5, the CTR standards are presumed to be attained.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Toxics Rule (CTR) aquatic life standards for cadmium are hardness-based. At the hardness levels measured for this station, the acute toxicity standard ranges from 2.29 to 2.75 ug/L and the chronic toxicity standard ranges from 1.45 to 1.65 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161753, Cadmium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337529
 
Pollutant: Cadmium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cadmium.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for cadmium incorporated by reference in the Basin Plan is 0.005 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161753, Cadmium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5070
 
Pollutant: Cadmium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological survey sampled cadmium under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 ad 2002. Four total cadmium samples had reported concentrations less than the detection limit. Per listing policy Section 6.1.5.5, the MCL is presumed to be attained.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituent" objective. The MCL for cadmium is 5 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161753, Cadmium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337526
 
Pollutant: Cadmium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cadmium.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The dissolved cadmium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is hardness dependent. The criterion when calculated using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 2.2 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161753, Cadmium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337531
 
Pollutant: Cadmium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cadmium.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for cadmium incorporated by reference in the Basin Plan is 0.005 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161754
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Carbaryl
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161754, Carbaryl
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337534
 
Pollutant: Carbaryl
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Carbaryl.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The USEPA Health Advisory for carbaryl as a drinking water level with a one in a million cancer risk is 0.04 mg/L.
Guideline Reference: 2012 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161754, Carbaryl
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337533
 
Pollutant: Carbaryl
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Carbaryl.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The USEPA National Recommended Aquatic Life criteria pursuant to Section 304(a) of the Clean Water Act for Carbaryl is 2.1 ug/L.
Guideline Reference: National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016.
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161755
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Chlordane
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161755, Chlordane
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337773
 
Pollutant: Chlordane
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Total Chlordane. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The chlordane criterion for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.00059 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161755, Chlordane
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99523
 
Pollutant: Chlordane
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Total Chlordanes. Data were collected for 1 fish species (1 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 5 fish per composite).
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: National Academy of Science guidelines (NAS 1972) establish a maximum total Chlordane concentration of 100 ug/Kg (wet weight) in tissue samples for protection of aquatic life from bioaccumulation of toxic substances.
Guideline Reference: National Academy of Sciences. Water Quality Criteria 1972. EPA-R3-73-033. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161755, Chlordane
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337772
 
Pollutant: Chlordane
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Total Chlordane. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The chlordane criterion for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.00057 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161755, Chlordane
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337771
 
Pollutant: Chlordane
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Total Chlordane. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The chlordane criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.0043 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161755, Chlordane
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99522
 
Pollutant: Chlordane
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Total Chlordanes. Data were collected for 1 fish species (1 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 5 fish per composite).
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for total chlordane in fish tissue is 3.9 ppb. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 32 g/day for a 30 year exposure over a 70-year lifetime. This constituent is a carcinogen therefore the risk level is set to one in a million. A cooking reduction factor of 1 is applied for skin-off fillets. (Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008)
Guideline Reference: Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
 
DECISION ID
163604
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Chloride
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163604, Chloride
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 342784
 
Pollutant: Chloride
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows:
1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Basin Plan objective for Chloride in this water body is 4 (mg/L), (as a Mean).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Walker River ~1mi below Murphy Pond (630PS0163)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-06-15 and 2015-06-15
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163604, Chloride
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 342733
 
Pollutant: Chloride
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 6
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows:
0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Basin Plan objective for Chloride in this water body is 4 (mg/L), (as a Mean).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Walker River, at CA/NV state line (630EWK001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-17 and 2021-11-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163604, Chloride
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 343550
 
Pollutant: Chloride
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows:
0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Basin Plan objective for Chloride in this water body is 4 (mg/L), (as a Mean).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Fork Walker River @ Stateline (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-12-02 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163604, Chloride
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 343622
 
Pollutant: Chloride
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 3
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows:
3 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Basin Plan objective for Chloride in this water body is 4 (mg/L), (as a Mean).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Fork Walker River @ Stateline (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-12 and 2016-05-04
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163604, Chloride
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 343551
 
Pollutant: Chloride
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows:
0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Basin Plan objective for Chloride in this water body is 4 (mg/L), (as a Mean).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Fork Walker River @ Stateline (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-12-02 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163604, Chloride
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 32229
 
Pollutant: Chloride
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Zero of 2 samples exceeded the Secondary MCLs.
Data Reference: RWB6 Trend Monitoring CY2006 CY2007
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels (SMCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The SMCL for chloride is 250 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels and Compliance. CCR Title 22 section 64449.
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: Data were collected at the following station: 630EWK001-East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected on the following dates: 8/14/2007 11/8/2007
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: 2002 QAMP (Quality Assurance Management Plan) for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163604, Chloride
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5040
 
Pollutant: Chloride
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 16
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled chloride under the Region 6 SWAMP program, at quarterly intervals between 2002 and 2005. Chloride concentrations in 16 samples ranged from 0.58 to 5.35 mg/L. The MCL was not violated.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The MCL for chloride is 250 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Sixteen quarterly samples (2 to 4 samples per year) were collected between 2001 and 2005.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163604, Chloride
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 96894
 
Pollutant: Chloride
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 6
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Data were collected as part of regional routine SWAMP monitoring. Data were collected from one site between 2010 and 2015. Concentrations in the raw data ranged from 0.83 to 5.35 mg/L. Six annual averages were computed, one of which exceeded the water quality objective in 2015.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water).
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The site specific objective for chloride in the East Walker River, as referenced in the Lahontan Basin Plan table 3-15, is an annual average concentration not to exceed 4.0 mg/L. While this objective is written to apply to waters above Bridgeport Reservoir it has been used to assess the waters below the reservoir in recognition of the East Walker River as an interstate water which provides critical water resources to western Nevada.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: Data were collected from one location, 630EWK001, which is located just upstream of the CA/NV state boundary.
Temporal Representation: Data were collected between October 2010 and October 2015 predominantly once per quarter.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data were collected in accordance with the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
 
DECISION ID
161823
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Chromium
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161823, Chromium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337541
 
Pollutant: Chromium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chromium.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for total chromium incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 0.05 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161823, Chromium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337540
 
Pollutant: Chromium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chromium.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for total chromium incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 0.05 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161823, Chromium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337536
 
Pollutant: Chromium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chromium.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The dissolved chromium (III) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is is hardness dependent as described in Table 1 of paragraph (b)(1). The value calculated when using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 180 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161756
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Chrysene (C1-C4)
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161756, Chrysene (C1-C4)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337545
 
Pollutant: Chrysene (C1-C4)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chrysene.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Chrysene criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.049 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161756, Chrysene (C1-C4)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337546
 
Pollutant: Chrysene (C1-C4)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chrysene. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Chrysene criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.0044 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161757
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Cobalt
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161757, Cobalt
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7698
 
Pollutant: Cobalt
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled the East Walker River under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Concentrations of dissolved cobalt in four samples ranged from 0.07 to 0.168 ug/L.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: There are no state or federal standards or criteria for cobalt for the protection of freshwater aquatic life.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161757, Cobalt
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337551
 
Pollutant: Cobalt
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Agricultural Supply
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cobalt.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Waters designated as AGR shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect the water for beneficial uses (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Water Quality for Agriculture, published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations in 1985, contains criteria protective of various agricultural uses of water. These criteria were used to translate narrative water quality objectives for chemical constituents that prohibit chemicals in concentrations that would impair agricultural uses of water. A 0.05 mg/L criteria is the recommended maximum concentration of cobalt in irrigation water.
Guideline Reference: Water Quality for Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev 1, Rome (1985)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-12-02 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161757, Cobalt
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337550
 
Pollutant: Cobalt
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Agricultural Supply
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cobalt.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Waters designated as AGR shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect the water for beneficial uses (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Water Quality for Agriculture, published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations in 1985, contains criteria protective of various agricultural uses of water. These criteria were used to translate narrative water quality objectives for chemical constituents that prohibit chemicals in concentrations that would impair agricultural uses of water. A 0.05 mg/L criteria is the recommended maximum concentration of cobalt in irrigation water.
Guideline Reference: Water Quality for Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev 1, Rome (1985)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-12-02 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161757, Cobalt
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7700
 
Pollutant: Cobalt
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled the East Walker River under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Four samples had concentrations of total recoverable cobalt below the detection level.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: There are no state or federal standards or criteria for cobalt for the protection of human health.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
161758
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Copper
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

Eleven lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of 20 samples exceed the MUN water quality objective (MCL) and zero of 12 samples exceed the CTR criteria for COLD.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. Zero of 20 samples exceed the MUN water quality objective (MCL) and zero of 12 samples exceed the CTV criteria for COLD and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161758, Copper
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5069
 
Pollutant: Copper
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled copper under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Dissolved copper concentrations in 4 samples ranged from 0.7 to 1.6 ug/L. The CTR standards were not violated.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Toxics Rule (CTR) freshwater aquatic life standards for copper are hardness-dependent, At the hardness levels reported for this station, the acute (1 hour average) standard ranges from 8.00 to 9.31 ug/L The chronic (4 day average) standard ranges from 5.60 to 6.42 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161758, Copper
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337560
 
Pollutant: Copper
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Copper.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The dissolved copper criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is hardness dependent. The criterion when calculated using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 9 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161758, Copper
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 341278
 
Pollutant: Copper
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Copper.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level for total Copper incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 1.0 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-12 and 2014-07-24
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161758, Copper
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337559
 
Pollutant: Copper
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Copper.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level for total Copper incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 1.0 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161758, Copper
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 341284
 
Pollutant: Copper
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Copper.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The dissolved copper criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is hardness dependent. The criterion when calculated using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 9 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-12 and 2014-07-24
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161758, Copper
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337561
 
Pollutant: Copper
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Copper.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level for total Copper incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 1.0 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161758, Copper
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 341271
 
Pollutant: Copper
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Copper.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level for total Copper incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 1.0 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-12 and 2014-07-24
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161758, Copper
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 130092
 
Pollutant: Copper
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed STORET data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Copper.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level for total Copper incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 1.0 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-07 and 2012-08-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QAPP not required for federal data
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161758, Copper
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5076
 
Pollutant: Copper
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled copper under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Total recoverable copper concentrations in 4 samples ranged from 1.0. to 1.4 ug/L. The MCLs were not exceeded.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) are applicable under the Lahontan Basin Plan's Chemical Constituents objective. The primary MCL for copper is 1300 ug/L and the secondary MCL is 1000 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161758, Copper
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99074
 
Pollutant: Copper
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed STORET data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Copper.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The criterion in freshwater is hardness dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness dependent formula for the metals criterion.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-07 and 2012-08-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QAPP not required for federal data
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161758, Copper
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 130044
 
Pollutant: Copper
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed STORET data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Copper.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level for total Copper incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 1.0 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-07 and 2012-08-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QAPP not required for federal data
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
 
DECISION ID
161759
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Cumene
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161759, Cumene
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337630
 
Pollutant: Cumene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Isopropylbenzene.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The USEPA expected safe lifetime exposure limit in drinking water for Isopropylbenzene, calculated using the IRIS Reference Dose, is 0.7 mg/L. This was calculated assuming 70 kg body weight, 2 liters/day water consumption, 20% relative source contribution from drinking water, and 0.1 mg/kg/day as the reference dose.
Guideline Reference: 2012 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-11-30 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
103816
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant that assess the same single tissue sample for COMM and COLD. Zero of one samples exceed the COLD guideline and zero of one samples exceed the COMM guideline for Total DDT.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. Zero of one samples exceed the COLD guideline and zero of one samples exceed the COMM guideline and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 103816, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99339
 
Pollutant: Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD). Data were collected for 1 fish species (1 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 5 fish per composite).
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for total DDT in fish tissue is 15 ppb. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 32 g/day for a 30 year exposure over a 70-year lifetime. This constituent is a carcinogen therefore the risk level is set to one in a million. A cooking reduction factor of 1 is applied for skin-off fillets. (Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008)
Guideline Reference: Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 103816, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99338
 
Pollutant: Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD). Data were collected for 1 fish species (1 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 5 fish per composite).
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: National Academy of Science guidelines (NAS 1972) establish a maximum total DDT concentration of 1000 ug/Kg (wet weight) in tissue samples for protection of aquatic life from bioaccumulation of toxic substances.
Guideline Reference: National Academy of Sciences. Water Quality Criteria 1972. EPA-R3-73-033. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
 
DECISION ID
161760
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Dacthal
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161760, Dacthal
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337563
 
Pollutant: Dacthal
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Dacthal.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The USEPA Lifetime Health advisory level for Dacthal is 0.07 mg/L.
Guideline Reference: 2012 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2019-12-16
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161760, Dacthal
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337562
 
Pollutant: Dacthal
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Dacthal.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for Dacthal is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of >11000 ug/L for a nonvascular plant (acute) and vascular plant (acute). The benchmark was derived from a greater-than value (for example, > 265,000) and may overestimate toxicity.
Guideline Reference: OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2019-12-16
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161761
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Diazinon
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161761, Diazinon
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337564
 
Pollutant: Diazinon
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Diazinon.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Basin Plan).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The freshwater chronic value for diazinon is 0.1 ug/L, expressed as a continuous concentration (Finlayson, 2004).
Guideline Reference: Water quality for diazinon. Memorandum to J. Karkoski, Central Valley RWQCB. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigation Unit, CA Department of Fish and Game
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161761, Diazinon
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337565
 
Pollutant: Diazinon
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Diazinon.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The USEPA drinking water health advisory for diazinon rounded to one significant figure is 1 ug/L.
Guideline Reference: 2018 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161809
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Dicamba
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161809, Dicamba
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337566
 
Pollutant: Dicamba
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Dicamba.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The USEPA Health Advisory for lifetime exposure to Dicamba as a drinking water level is a concentration of 4 mg/L.
Guideline Reference: 2012 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161809, Dicamba
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337567
 
Pollutant: Dicamba
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Dicamba.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for Dicamba is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 61 ug/L for a nonvascular plant (acute) for Dicamba acid.
Guideline Reference: OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161762
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Dichlorodifluoromethane
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161762, Dichlorodifluoromethane
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337568
 
Pollutant: Dichlorodifluoromethane
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Dichlorodifluoromethane.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: USEPA's Drinking Water Health advisory for life-time exposure is a concentration for dichlorofluoromethane of 1 mg/L
Guideline Reference: 2012 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-11-30 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161763
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Dieldrin
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161763, Dieldrin
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99101
 
Pollutant: Dieldrin
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Dieldrin. Data were collected for 1 fish species (1 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 5 fish per composite). Of these, 1 species (Sacramento Blackfish) exceeded the water quality standard.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for dieldrin in fish tissue is 0.32 ppb. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 32 g/day for a 30 year exposure over a 70-year lifetime. This constituent is a carcinogen therefore the risk level is set to one in a million. A cooking reduction factor of 1 is applied for skin-off fillets. (Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008)
Guideline Reference: Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161763, Dieldrin
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337574
 
Pollutant: Dieldrin
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Dieldrin.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The dieldrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.056 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161763, Dieldrin
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99099
 
Pollutant: Dieldrin
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Dieldrin. Data were collected for 1 fish species (1 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 5 fish per composite).
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: National Academy of Science guidelines (NAS 1972) establish a maximum Dieldrin concentration of 100 ug/Kg (wet weight) in tissue samples for protection of aquatic life from bioaccumulation of toxic substances.
Guideline Reference: National Academy of Sciences. Water Quality Criteria 1972. EPA-R3-73-033. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161763, Dieldrin
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337576
 
Pollutant: Dieldrin
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Dieldrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Dieldrin criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.00014 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161763, Dieldrin
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337575
 
Pollutant: Dieldrin
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Dieldrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Dieldrin criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.00014 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161764
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Diethyl phthalate
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161764, Diethyl phthalate
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337580
 
Pollutant: Diethyl phthalate
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Diethyl phthalate.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Diethylphthalate criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 120,000 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-11-30 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161764, Diethyl phthalate
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337578
 
Pollutant: Diethyl phthalate
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Diethyl phthalate.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Diethylphthalate criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 23,000 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-11-30 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161764, Diethyl phthalate
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337579
 
Pollutant: Diethyl phthalate
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Diethyl phthalate.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Diethylphthalate criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 23,000 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2019-12-16
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161764, Diethyl phthalate
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337577
 
Pollutant: Diethyl phthalate
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Diethyl phthalate.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Diethylphthalate criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 120,000 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2019-12-16
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161813
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Dimethoate
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161813, Dimethoate
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337581
 
Pollutant: Dimethoate
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Dimethoate.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Drinking water notification levels are published by the Division of Drinking Water and are for chemicals for which there is no drinking water MCL. If a notification level is exceeded, local government notification is required and customer notification is recommended. The notification level for dimethoate is 1 ug/L.
Guideline Reference: CDPH Archived Advisory Levels for Drinking Water. Archived Advisory Levels are currently considered Notification Levels.
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161813, Dimethoate
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337582
 
Pollutant: Dimethoate
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Dimethoate.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for dimethoate is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.5 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic).
Guideline Reference: OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161765
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Dimethyl phthalate
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161765, Dimethyl phthalate
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337584
 
Pollutant: Dimethyl phthalate
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Dimethyl phthalate.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Dimethylphthalate criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 313,000 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2019-12-16
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161765, Dimethyl phthalate
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337583
 
Pollutant: Dimethyl phthalate
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Dimethyl phthalate.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Dimethylphthalate criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 2,900,000 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2019-12-16
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161766
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Dinoseb
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161766, Dinoseb
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337587
 
Pollutant: Dinoseb
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Dinoseb.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for Dinoseb is the LC50 of 44 ug/L for Salvelinus namaycush (Lake trout) (USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs Ecotoxicity database).
Guideline Reference: OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database.
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161766, Dinoseb
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337588
 
Pollutant: Dinoseb
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Dinoseb.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for Dinoseb incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 7 ug/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161767
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Diquat
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161767, Diquat
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337590
 
Pollutant: Diquat
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Diquat.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for Diquat incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 20 ug/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161767, Diquat
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337589
 
Pollutant: Diquat
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Diquat.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for diquat is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.75 ug/L for a vascular plant (acute).
Guideline Reference: OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
102638
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Endosulfan
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant both based on the same single tissue sample assessed for COLD and COMM. The single tissue sample does not exceed the guideline for either COLD or COMM.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. Zero of one samples exceeded the tissue guideline for COLD or for COMM and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 102638, Endosulfan
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99154
 
Pollutant: Endosulfan
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Endosulfan. Data were collected for 1 fish species (1 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 5 fish per composite).
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: National Academy of Science guidelines (NAS 1972) establish a maximum Endosulfan, Total concentration of 100 ug/Kg (wet weight) in tissue samples for protection of aquatic life from bioaccumulation of toxic substances.
Guideline Reference: National Academy of Sciences. Water Quality Criteria 1972. EPA-R3-73-033. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 102638, Endosulfan
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99153
 
Pollutant: Endosulfan
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Endosulfan. Data were collected for 1 fish species (1 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 5 fish per composite).
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for endosulfan (l and ll) in fish tissue is 13,000 ppb. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 32 g/day. A cooking reduction factor of 1 is applied for skin-off fillets. (Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008; USEPA, 2000)
Guideline Reference: Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene
Guideline Reference: Guidance for Assessing Chemical Contaminant Data for Use In Fish Advisories Volume 1: Fish Sampling and Analysis
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
 
DECISION ID
161768
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Endothall
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161768, Endothall
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337591
 
Pollutant: Endothall
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Endothall.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for Endothall incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 100 ug/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161769
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Endrin
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161769, Endrin
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337593
 
Pollutant: Endrin
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Endrin.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The endrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161769, Endrin
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337594
 
Pollutant: Endrin
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Endrin.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Endrin criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.81ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161769, Endrin
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99125
 
Pollutant: Endrin
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Endrin. Data were collected for 1 fish species (1 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 5 fish per composite).
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for endrin in fish tissue is 660 ppb. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 32 g/day. A cooking reduction factor of 1 is applied for skin-off fillets. (Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008; USEPA, 2000)
Guideline Reference: Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene
Guideline Reference: Guidance for Assessing Chemical Contaminant Data for Use In Fish Advisories Volume 1: Fish Sampling and Analysis
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161769, Endrin
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99123
 
Pollutant: Endrin
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Endrin. Data were collected for 1 fish species (1 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 5 fish per composite).
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: National Academy of Science guidelines (NAS 1972) establish a maximum Endrin concentration of 100 ug/Kg (wet weight) in tissue samples for protection of aquatic life from bioaccumulation of toxic substances.
Guideline Reference: National Academy of Sciences. Water Quality Criteria 1972. EPA-R3-73-033. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161769, Endrin
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337592
 
Pollutant: Endrin
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Endrin.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Endrin criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.76 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161770
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Fluorene
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161770, Fluorene
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337595
 
Pollutant: Fluorene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fluorene.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The fluorene criterion for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 1,300 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161770, Fluorene
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337596
 
Pollutant: Fluorene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fluorene.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The fluorene criterion for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 14,000 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161771
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Fluoride
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

11 lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 60 samples exceed the MUN water quality objective, and zero of 35 samples exceed the AGR evaluation guideline for fluoride.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. Zero of the 60 samples exceed the MUN water quality objective, and zero of 35 samples exceed the AGR evaluation guideline for fluoride and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161771, Fluoride
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99002
 
Pollutant: Fluoride
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed STORET data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Fluoride.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for Fluoride incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 2 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-03-09 and 2012-08-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QAPP not required for federal data
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161771, Fluoride
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 338634
 
Pollutant: Fluoride
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 14
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 14 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fluoride.
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for Fluoride incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 2 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630EWK001 (East Walker River, at CA/NV state line).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-17 and 2020-03-11
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161771, Fluoride
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337600
 
Pollutant: Fluoride
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Agricultural Supply
 
Number of Samples: 8
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fluoride.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Waters designated as AGR shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect the water for beneficial uses (i.e., agricultural purposes). (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Water Quality for Agriculture, published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations in 1985, contains criteria protective of various agricultural uses of water. These criteria were used to translate narrative water quality objectives for chemical constituents that prohibit chemicals in concentrations that would impair agricultural uses of water. A 1 mg/L criteria is the recommended maximum concentration of Fluoride in irrigation water.
Guideline Reference: Water Quality for Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev 1, Rome (1985)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-10 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161771, Fluoride
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 341323
 
Pollutant: Fluoride
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Agricultural Supply
 
Number of Samples: 9
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fluoride.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Waters designated as AGR shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect the water for beneficial uses (i.e., agricultural purposes). (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Water Quality for Agriculture, published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations in 1985, contains criteria protective of various agricultural uses of water. These criteria were used to translate narrative water quality objectives for chemical constituents that prohibit chemicals in concentrations that would impair agricultural uses of water. A 1 mg/L criteria is the recommended maximum concentration of Fluoride in irrigation water.
Guideline Reference: Water Quality for Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev 1, Rome (1985)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-12 and 2017-03-14
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161771, Fluoride
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 341320
 
Pollutant: Fluoride
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 9
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fluoride.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for Fluoride incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 2 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-12 and 2017-03-14
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161771, Fluoride
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 338592
 
Pollutant: Fluoride
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Agricultural Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fluoride.
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Waters designated as AGR shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect the water for beneficial uses (i.e., agricultural purposes). (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Water Quality for Agriculture, published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations in 1985, contains criteria protective of various agricultural uses of water. These criteria were used to translate narrative water quality objectives for chemical constituents that prohibit chemicals in concentrations that would impair agricultural uses of water. A 1 mg/L criteria is the recommended maximum concentration of Fluoride in irrigation water.
Guideline Reference: Water Quality for Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev 1, Rome (1985)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630EWK001 (East Walker River, at CA/NV state line).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-01 and 2021-11-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161771, Fluoride
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 338606
 
Pollutant: Fluoride
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Agricultural Supply
 
Number of Samples: 14
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 14 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fluoride.
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Waters designated as AGR shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect the water for beneficial uses (i.e., agricultural purposes). (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Water Quality for Agriculture, published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations in 1985, contains criteria protective of various agricultural uses of water. These criteria were used to translate narrative water quality objectives for chemical constituents that prohibit chemicals in concentrations that would impair agricultural uses of water. A 1 mg/L criteria is the recommended maximum concentration of Fluoride in irrigation water.
Guideline Reference: Water Quality for Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev 1, Rome (1985)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630EWK001 (East Walker River, at CA/NV state line).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-17 and 2020-03-11
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161771, Fluoride
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337602
 
Pollutant: Fluoride
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 8
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fluoride.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for Fluoride incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 2 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-10 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161771, Fluoride
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 32237
 
Pollutant: Fluoride
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Zero of 2 samples exceed the MCL for Flouride.
Data Reference: RWB6 Trend Monitoring CY2006 CY2007
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The MCL for Fluoride is 2.0 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: Data were collected at the following station: 630EWK001-East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected on the following dates: 8/14/2007 11/8/2007
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: 2002 QAMP (Quality Assurance Management Plan) for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161771, Fluoride
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 97231
 
Pollutant: Fluoride
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 20
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 20 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Fluoride.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water).
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for Fluoride incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 2 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (630EWK001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-10-22 and 2015-10-15
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161771, Fluoride
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 338581
 
Pollutant: Fluoride
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fluoride.
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for Fluoride incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 2 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630EWK001 (East Walker River, at CA/NV state line).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-01 and 2021-11-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
 
DECISION ID
161772
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Glyphosate
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161772, Glyphosate
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337603
 
Pollutant: Glyphosate
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Glyphosate.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for Glyphosate incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 700 ug/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161772, Glyphosate
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337604
 
Pollutant: Glyphosate
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Glyphosate.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for Glyphosate is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 11900 ug/L for a vascular plant (acute).
Guideline Reference: OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161773
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Heptachlor
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161773, Heptachlor
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337608
 
Pollutant: Heptachlor
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The heptachlor criterion for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.00021 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161773, Heptachlor
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337610
 
Pollutant: Heptachlor
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The heptachlor criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.0038 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161773, Heptachlor
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337606
 
Pollutant: Heptachlor
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The heptachlor criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.0038 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-11-30 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161773, Heptachlor
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337607
 
Pollutant: Heptachlor
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The heptachlor criterion for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.00021 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161773, Heptachlor
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337609
 
Pollutant: Heptachlor
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The heptachlor criterion for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.00021 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-11-30 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161773, Heptachlor
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99202
 
Pollutant: Heptachlor
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Heptachlor. Data were collected for 1 fish species (1 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 5 fish per composite).
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: National Academy of Science guidelines (NAS 1972) establish a maximum Heptachlor concentration of 100 ug/Kg (wet weight) in tissue samples for protection of aquatic life from bioaccumulation of toxic substances.
Guideline Reference: National Academy of Sciences. Water Quality Criteria 1972. EPA-R3-73-033. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161773, Heptachlor
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337605
 
Pollutant: Heptachlor
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The heptachlor criterion for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.00021 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-11-30 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161774
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Heptachlor epoxide
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161774, Heptachlor epoxide
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337613
 
Pollutant: Heptachlor epoxide
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor Epoxide. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The heptachlor epoxide criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.0038 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2019-12-16
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161774, Heptachlor epoxide
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337611
 
Pollutant: Heptachlor epoxide
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor Epoxide. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Heptachlor Epoxide criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.00010 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2019-12-16
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161774, Heptachlor epoxide
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99459
 
Pollutant: Heptachlor epoxide
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Waterboard staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: Zero of Zero samples exceeded the water quality standard for Heptachlor Epoxide. Although data was collected for 1 fish species (1 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 5 fish per composite), all 1 sample(s) had to be thrown out due to quantitation issues.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for heptachlor epoxide in fish tissue is 0.93 ppb. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 32 g/day for a 30 year exposure over a 70-year lifetime. This constituent is a carcinogen therefore the risk level is set to one in a million. A cooking reduction factor of 1 is applied for skin-off fillets. (Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008; OEHHA, 1999)
Guideline Reference: Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene
Guideline Reference: Public Health Goal for Heptachlor and Heptachlor Epoxide in Drinking Water
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161774, Heptachlor epoxide
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99461
 
Pollutant: Heptachlor epoxide
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Heptachlor Epoxide. Data were collected for 1 fish species (1 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 5 fish per composite).
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: National Academy of Science guidelines (NAS 1972) establish a maximum Heptachlor Epoxide concentration of 100 ug/Kg (wet weight) in tissue samples for protection of aquatic life from bioaccumulation of toxic substances.
Guideline Reference: National Academy of Sciences. Water Quality Criteria 1972. EPA-R3-73-033. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161774, Heptachlor epoxide
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337612
 
Pollutant: Heptachlor epoxide
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor Epoxide. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Heptachlor Epoxide criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.00011 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2019-12-16
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161775
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Hexachlorobenzene/ HCB
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161775, Hexachlorobenzene/ HCB
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337614
 
Pollutant: Hexachlorobenzene/ HCB
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Hexachlorobenzene. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Hexachlorobenzene criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.00075 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161775, Hexachlorobenzene/ HCB
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99431
 
Pollutant: Hexachlorobenzene/ HCB
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Hexachlorobenzene. Data were collected for 1 fish species (1 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 5 fish per composite).
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for hexachlorobenzene in fish tissue is 2.8 ppb. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 32 g/day for a 30 year exposure over a 70-year lifetime. This constituent is a carcinogen therefore the risk level is set to one in a million. A cooking reduction factor of 1 is applied for skin-off fillets. (Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008; OEHHA, 2005)
Guideline Reference: Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene
Guideline Reference: Air Toxics Hotspots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines. Part ll Technical Support Document for Describing Available Cancer Potency Values.
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161775, Hexachlorobenzene/ HCB
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337615
 
Pollutant: Hexachlorobenzene/ HCB
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Hexachlorobenzene. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Hexachlorobenzene criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.00077 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161776
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Hexachlorobutadiene
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161776, Hexachlorobutadiene
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337617
 
Pollutant: Hexachlorobutadiene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Hexachlorobutadiene.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Hexachlorobutadiene criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 50 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-11-30 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161776, Hexachlorobutadiene
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337616
 
Pollutant: Hexachlorobutadiene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Hexachlorobutadiene. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Hexachlorobutadiene criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.44 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-11-30 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161777
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161777, Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337619
 
Pollutant: Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Hexachlorocyclopentadiene.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Hexachlorocyclopentadiene criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 17,000 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161777, Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337618
 
Pollutant: Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Hexachlorocyclopentadiene.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for Hexachlorocyclopentadiene incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 50 ug/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
168736
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Indicator Bacteria
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

Four lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of 52 samples exceed the objective.
(Fecal coliform lines of evidence used in previous indicator bacteria decisions in the Lahontan Region have been removed, starting in the 2026 Integrated Report, since the Lahontan Region's fecal coliform water quality objective was removed from the Basin Plan in 2024).

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. 0 of 52 samples exceeded the objective and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 168736, Indicator Bacteria
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99702
 
Pollutant: Escherichia coli (E. coli)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Water Contact Recreation
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed RWB6_BACT_Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality standard for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for Regional Water Board 6 Bacteria Monitoring.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The bacteria water quality objective applicable to all waters, except Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is less than 10 parts per thousand (ppth) 95 percent or more of the time is a STATISTICAL THRESHOLD VALUE (STV) of 320 cfu/100 mL not to be exceeded more than 10 percent of the time (calculated monthly).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 630EWK001
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the days of 2015-08-19 and 2016-09-28 .
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 168736, Indicator Bacteria
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 336882
 
Pollutant: Escherichia coli (E. coli)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: STV
 
Beneficial Use: Water Contact Recreation
 
Number of Samples: 6
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 6 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the days of 2012-06-04 and 2016-10-10 .
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 168736, Indicator Bacteria
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 336842
 
Pollutant: Escherichia coli (E. coli)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: STV
 
Beneficial Use: Water Contact Recreation
 
Number of Samples: 14
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 14 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly.
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 630EWK001 (East Walker River, at CA/NV state line).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the days of 2016-01-19 and 2021-11-23 .
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 168736, Indicator Bacteria
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 96927
 
Pollutant: Escherichia coli (E. coli)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: STV
 
Beneficial Use: Water Contact Recreation
 
Number of Samples: 30
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Data were collected by Lahontan staff for the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) RWB6 Monitoring program, and for a supplemental TMDL Integrated Report Special Study. The TMDL Special Study was developed by Lahontan Planning and SWAMP staff to provide additional data to the quarterly SWAMP monitoring. The purpose was to gain a better temporal understanding of levels of specific pollutants in the waterbody. To ensure the two datasets could be viably analyzed as one, the TMDL Special Study followed the same sampling protocol as SWAMP. Accordingly, the two datasets have been combined for this assessment to reflect the intended design and to best characterize conditions in the watershed. Water Board staff determined beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 30 samples exceeded exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality standard for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water).
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The bacteria water quality objective applicable to all waters, except Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is less than 10 parts per thousand (ppth) 95 percent or more of the time is a STATISTICAL THRESHOLD VALUE (STV) of 320 cfu/100 mL not to be exceeded more than 10 percent of the time (calculated monthly).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site, station: 630EWK001
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the days of 2011-06-13 and 2016-22-12 .
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program  
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
 
DECISION ID
161779
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Isophorone
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161779, Isophorone
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337628
 
Pollutant: Isophorone
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Isophorone.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Isophorone criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 600 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161779, Isophorone
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337629
 
Pollutant: Isophorone
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Isophorone.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Isophorone criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 8.4 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161780
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Lead
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161780, Lead
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5120
 
Pollutant: Lead
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological survey sampled lead under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Concentrations of total recoverable lead in four quarterly samples were below the detection limit. Per listing policy Section 6.1.5.5, the MCL is presumed to be attained.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The MCL for lead is 15 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161780, Lead
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337636
 
Pollutant: Lead
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's 'Chemical Constituents' objective. The MCL for lead is 15 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161780, Lead
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5121
 
Pollutant: Lead
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological survey sampled lead under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Dissolved lead concentrations in four samples included two values below the detection level, one estimated value, and one 0.16 ug/L value. The CTR standards were not exceeded.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Toxic Rule (CTR) standards for lead are dependent on hardness. At the reported hardness levels for this station, the acute (1 hour average) standard ranged from 32.06 to 39.33 ug/L. The chronic (4 day average) standard ranged from 1.25 to 1.53 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161780, Lead
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337633
 
Pollutant: Lead
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The dissolved lead criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is hardness dependent. The criterion when calculated using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 2.5 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161780, Lead
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337631
 
Pollutant: Lead
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's 'Chemical Constituents' objective. The MCL for lead is 15 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
102643
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH)
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant that are both based on the same single fish tissue sample assessed for COLD and COMM. The single sample does not exceed the guideline for either COLD or COMM.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. Zero of one samples exceeded the guideline for both COLD and COMM and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 102643, Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99385
 
Pollutant: Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for HCH, gamma-. Data were collected for 1 fish species (1 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 5 fish per composite).
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for lindane in fish tissue is 4.6 ppb. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 32 g/day for a 30 year exposure over a 70-year lifetime. This constituent is a carcinogen therefore the risk level is set to one in a million. A cooking reduction factor of 1 is applied for skin-off fillets. (Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008; OEHHA, 2005)
Guideline Reference: Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene
Guideline Reference: Air Toxics Hotspots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines. Part ll Technical Support Document for Describing Available Cancer Potency Values.
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 102643, Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99386
 
Pollutant: Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for HCH, gamma-. Data were collected for 1 fish species (1 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 5 fish per composite).
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: National Academy of Science guidelines (NAS 1972) establish a maximum Lindane concentration of 100 ug/Kg (wet weight) in tissue samples for protection of aquatic life from bioaccumulation of toxic substances.
Guideline Reference: National Academy of Sciences. Water Quality Criteria 1972. EPA-R3-73-033. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
 
DECISION ID
170625
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Mercury
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

Ten lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant, two that assess for mercury in water and eight that assess fish tissue.

One of one fish tissues samples exceed the COMM tissue objective for mercury. One of one samples exceed the WILD tissue objective.

Zero of 14 water samples exceed the COLD criteria. Zero of four samples exceed the MUN critera.

The exceedances in the fish tissue data indicate this waterbody is likely impaired for mercury, however more data is needed to confirm this.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. One of one fish tissues samples exceed the COMM tissue objective for mercury. One of one samples exceed the WILD tissue objective. Zero of 14 samples exceed the COLD criteria for mercury in water. Zero of four samples exceed the MUN criteria. This does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.

Since the single sample did exceed the mercury tissue objectives for COMM and WILD, this indicates mercury impairment is probable for this water body.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 170625, Mercury
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 133156
 
Pollutant: Mercury
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Wildlife Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Mercury. This LOE contains data only for trophic level 3 fish. The concentration of Mercury in fish collected within the same calendar year, for the same trophic level were averaged into a single sample for comparison with the objective. A total of 7 fish were aggregated into 1 annual averages, which consisted of 2 fish species (1 composite(s) of Rainbow Trout each composed of 1 fish per composite, 6 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 1 fish per composite). Of these annual averages, 1 average(s), (Year(s): 2011) exceeded the objective.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The Statewide Sport Fish Water Quality Objective for the protection of Wildlife Habitat comes from the Statewide Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California, and is 0.2 mg/Kg wet weight skinless fillet samples of trophic level 3, or trophic level 4 fish (whichever is highest in the water body) over a one year averaging period. If trophic level 3 fish are used in the assessment then the Prey Fish Water Quality Objective must also be used to determine that the Sport Fish Objective is being met. Trophic levels of applicable fish are defined in, but not limited to those in Attachment C of the Final Regulatory Language document (Appendix A) of State Water Resources Control Board Resolution No. 2017-0027.
Guideline Reference: Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-09-06
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 170625, Mercury
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337658
 
Pollutant: Mercury
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Mercury.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: National Recommended Water Quality Criteria Continuous Concentrations (4-day average concentrations) for freshwater aquatic organisms exposure to total mercury is 0.77 ug/L.
Guideline Reference: National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016.
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 170625, Mercury
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337655
 
Pollutant: Mercury
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Mercury. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 5 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Mercury criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.051 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 170625, Mercury
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337657
 
Pollutant: Mercury
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Mercury. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 5 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The mercury criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.050 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 170625, Mercury
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337660
 
Pollutant: Mercury
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Mercury.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: National Recommended Water Quality Criteria Continuous Concentrations (4-day average concentrations) for freshwater aquatic organisms exposure to total mercury is 0.77 ug/L.
Guideline Reference: National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016.
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 170625, Mercury
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337648
 
Pollutant: Mercury
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Mercury. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 5 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The mercury criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.050 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 170625, Mercury
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337659
 
Pollutant: Mercury
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Mercury. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 5 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Mercury criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.051 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 170625, Mercury
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5082
 
Pollutant: Mercury
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled mercury under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Mercury concentrations in four samples ranged from less than 0.01 ug/L to 0.01 ug/L. The MCL was not violated.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The MCL tor inorganic mercury is 2 ug/L.

The California Toxics Rule water and fish consumption standard for mercury is 0.050 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 170625, Mercury
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5764
 
Pollutant: Mercury
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled mercury quarterly in the East Walker River under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Three of four total mercury samples were below the detection level, and one was 0.01 ug/L The criteria were not violated.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) freshwater aquatic life criteria (expressed as total mercury) are a 4- day average of 0.77 ug/L and a 1-hour maximum of 1.4 ug/L
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 170625, Mercury
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 133071
 
Pollutant: Mercury
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Mercury. This LOE contains data only for trophic level 3 fish. The concentration of Mercury in fish collected within the same calendar year, for the same trophic level were averaged into a single sample for comparison with the objective. A total of 7 fish were aggregated into 1 annual averages, which consisted of 2 fish species (1 composite(s) of Rainbow Trout each composed of 1 fish per composite, 6 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 1 fish per composite). Of these annual averages, 1 average(s), (Year(s): 2011) exceeded the objective. This LOE does not contain data from fish whos average length was outside of the legal size limits as described by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Fishing Regulations.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The Statewide Sport Fish Water Quality Objective for the protection of the Commercial and Sport Fishing beneficial comes from the Statewide Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California, and is 0.2 mg/Kg wet weight skinless fillet samples of trophic level 3, or trophic level 4 fish (whichever is highest in the water body) over a one year averaging period. Trophic levels of applicable fish are defined in, but not limited to those in Attachment C of the Final Regulatory Language document (Appendix A) of State Water Resources Control Board Resolution No. 2017-0027.
Guideline Reference: Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-09-06
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
 
DECISION ID
161810
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Methiocarb
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161810, Methiocarb
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337664
 
Pollutant: Methiocarb
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Methiocarb.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for methiocarb is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 2.75 ug/L for an invertebrate (acute).
Guideline Reference: OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161811
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Methomyl
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161811, Methomyl
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337665
 
Pollutant: Methomyl
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Methomyl.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for methomyl is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.6 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic).
Guideline Reference: OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161811, Methomyl
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337666
 
Pollutant: Methomyl
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Methomyl.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The USEPA drinking water lifetime health advisory for methomyl is 200 ug/L.
Guideline Reference: 2018 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161782
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Methoxychlor
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161782, Methoxychlor
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337667
 
Pollutant: Methoxychlor
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Methoxychlor.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for Methoxychlor incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 30 ug/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161782, Methoxychlor
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337668
 
Pollutant: Methoxychlor
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Methoxychlor. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The USEPA national ambient water quality criterion for freshwater aquatic life Criterion Continuous Concentration (CCC) expressed as a 4-day average for methoxychlor is 0.03 ug/L.
Guideline Reference: National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016.
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161783
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Methyl chloride (Chloromethane)
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161783, Methyl chloride (Chloromethane)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337535
 
Pollutant: Methyl chloride (Chloromethane)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloromethane.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The USEPA Health Advisory for 10 day exposure of a 10 kg-Child to chloromethane as a drinking water level is a concentration of 0.4 mg/L.
Guideline Reference: 2012 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-11-30 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161784
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Methyl isobutyl ketone (Methyl-2-Pentanone)
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161784, Methyl isobutyl ketone (Methyl-2-Pentanone)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337669
 
Pollutant: Methyl isobutyl ketone (Methyl-2-Pentanone)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Methyl-2-pentanone, 4-.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Drinking water notification levels are published by the Division of Drinking Water and are for chemicals for which there is no drinking water MCL. If a notification level is exceeded, local government notification is required and customer notification is recommended. The criteria for Methyl isobutyl ketone is 0.12 mg/L.
Guideline Reference: Drinking Water Notification and Response Levels: An Overview
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-11-30 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161814
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Metolachlor
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161814, Metolachlor
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337671
 
Pollutant: Metolachlor
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Metolachlor.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for metolachlor is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 8 ug/L for nonvascular plants.
Guideline Reference: OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161814, Metolachlor
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337670
 
Pollutant: Metolachlor
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Metolachlor.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The USEPA Water Quality Advisory for Metolachlor is 0.044 mg/L. (USEPA Water Quality Advisory, March 1986, p. 15)
Guideline Reference: Water Quality Health Advisory document for Metolachlor
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161815
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Metribuzin
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161815, Metribuzin
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337673
 
Pollutant: Metribuzin
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Metribuzin.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The USEPA Health Advisory for lifetime exposure to Metribuzin as a drinking water level is a concentration of 0.07 mg/L.
Guideline Reference: 2012 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161815, Metribuzin
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337672
 
Pollutant: Metribuzin
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Metribuzin.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for metribuzin is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 8.1 ug/L for a nonvascular plant (acute).
Guideline Reference: OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
102644
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Microcystins
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

Five lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant that are all based on the same single tissue sample analyzed for different forms of microcystin. Zero of one samples exceed the guideline for all four of the forms of microcystin analyzed.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. Zero of one samples exceed the guideline for all four of the forms of microcystin and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 102644, Microcystins
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99251
 
Pollutant: Microcystins
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Microcystins. Data were collected for 1 fish species (1 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 5 fish per composite).
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The 10 ng/g wet weight action level for microcystins for edible sport fish and shellfish containing microcystins identifies the maximum concentration of cyanotoxins that a typical consumer (one meal per week) could ingest without exceeding the reference dose, and is equal to the sum of the Microcystin congeners LA, LR, RR, and LY.(OEHHA 2012)
Guideline Reference: Toxicological Summary and Suggested Action Levels to Reduce Potential Adverse Health Effects of Six Cyanotoxins
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 102644, Microcystins
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99244
 
Pollutant: Microcystin-YR
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Microcystin-YR. Data were collected for 1 fish species (1 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 5 fish per composite).
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The 10 ng/g wet weight action level for microcystins for edible sport fish and shellfish containing Microcystin-YR identifies the maximum concentration of cyanotoxins that a typical consumer (one meal per week) could ingest without exceeding the reference dose.(OEHHA 2012)
Guideline Reference: Toxicological Summary and Suggested Action Levels to Reduce Potential Adverse Health Effects of Six Cyanotoxins
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 102644, Microcystins
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99489
 
Pollutant: Microcystin-RR
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Microcystin-RR. Data were collected for 1 fish species (1 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 5 fish per composite).
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The 10 ng/g wet weight action level for microcystins for edible sport fish and shellfish containing Microcystin-RR identifies the maximum concentration of cyanotoxins that a typical consumer (one meal per week) could ingest without exceeding the reference dose.(OEHHA 2012)
Guideline Reference: Toxicological Summary and Suggested Action Levels to Reduce Potential Adverse Health Effects of Six Cyanotoxins
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 102644, Microcystins
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99483
 
Pollutant: Microcystin-LR
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Microcystin-LR. Data were collected for 1 fish species (1 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 5 fish per composite).
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The 10 ng/g wet weight action level for microcystins for edible sport fish and shellfish containing Microcystin-LR identifies the maximum concentration of cyanotoxins that a typical consumer (one meal per week) could ingest without exceeding the reference dose.(OEHHA 2012)
Guideline Reference: Toxicological Summary and Suggested Action Levels to Reduce Potential Adverse Health Effects of Six Cyanotoxins
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 102644, Microcystins
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99477
 
Pollutant: Microcystin-LA
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Microcystin-LA. Data were collected for 1 fish species (1 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 5 fish per composite).
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The 10 ng/g wet weight action level for microcystins for edible sport fish and shellfish containing Microcystin-LA identifies the maximum concentration of cyanotoxins that a typical consumer (one meal per week) could ingest without exceeding the reference dose.(OEHHA 2012)
Guideline Reference: Toxicological Summary and Suggested Action Levels to Reduce Potential Adverse Health Effects of Six Cyanotoxins
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
 
DECISION ID
103815
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Mirex
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant that consists of a single tissue sample however it could not be assessed due to quantitation issues. Zero of zero samples exceed the guideline for mirex.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3.Zero of zero samples exceeded the guideline and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 103815, Mirex
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99269
 
Pollutant: Mirex
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Waterboard staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: Zero of Zero samples exceeded the water quality standard for Mirex. Although data was collected for 1 fish species (1 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 5 fish per composite), all 1 sample(s) had to be thrown out due to quantitation issues.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The modified OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for mirex in fish tissue is 0.28 ppb. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 32 g/day. This constituent is a carcinogen therefore the risk level is set to one in a million. A cooking reduction factor of 1 is applied for skin-off fillets. (Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008; OEHHA, 1992)
Guideline Reference: Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene
Guideline Reference: Expedited Cancer Potency Values and Proposed Regulatory Levels for Certain Proposition 65 Carcinogens.
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
 
DECISION ID
161785
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Molinate
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161785, Molinate
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337674
 
Pollutant: Molinate
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Molinate.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for Molinate incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 20 ug/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161785, Molinate
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337675
 
Pollutant: Molinate
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Molinate.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for molinate is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 105 ug/L for a fish (acute).
Guideline Reference: OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161786
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Molybdenum
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161786, Molybdenum
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337683
 
Pollutant: Molybdenum
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Molybdenum.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: EPA Drinking Water Lifetime Health advisory level for Molybdenum is 0.04 mg/L.
Guideline Reference: 2012 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-12-02 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161786, Molybdenum
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337681
 
Pollutant: Molybdenum
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Agricultural Supply
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Molybdenum.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Waters designated as AGR shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect the water for beneficial uses (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Water Quality for Agriculture, published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations in 1985, contains criteria protective of various agricultural uses of water. These criteria were used to translate narrative water quality objectives for chemical constituents that prohibit chemicals in concentrations that would impair agricultural uses of water. The recommended maximum concentration of molybdenum in irrigation water is 0.01 mg/L.
Guideline Reference: Water Quality for Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev 1, Rome (1985)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-12-02 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161786, Molybdenum
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7707
 
Pollutant: Molybdenum
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled the East Walker River under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Total recoverable molybdenum concentrations in four samples ranged from 4.4 to 4.9 ug/L.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: There are no applicable state or federal standards or criteria for molybdenum for protection of the Municipal and Domestic Supply use.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161786, Molybdenum
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7709
 
Pollutant: Molybdenum
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled the East Walker River under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Concentrations of dissolved molybdenum in four samples ranged from 4.3 to 4.8 ug/L.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: There are no state or federal standards or criteria for cobalt for the protection of freshwater aquatic life.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161786, Molybdenum
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337676
 
Pollutant: Molybdenum
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Molybdenum.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: EPA Drinking Water Lifetime Health advisory level for Molybdenum is 0.04 mg/L.
Guideline Reference: 2012 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161786, Molybdenum
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337677
 
Pollutant: Molybdenum
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Agricultural Supply
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Molybdenum.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Waters designated as AGR shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect the water for beneficial uses (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Water Quality for Agriculture, published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations in 1985, contains criteria protective of various agricultural uses of water. These criteria were used to translate narrative water quality objectives for chemical constituents that prohibit chemicals in concentrations that would impair agricultural uses of water. The recommended maximum concentration of molybdenum in irrigation water is 0.01 mg/L.
Guideline Reference: Water Quality for Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev 1, Rome (1985)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161787
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Naphthalene
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161787, Naphthalene
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337689
 
Pollutant: Naphthalene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Naphthalene.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The USEPA recommended naphthalene criterion for the protection of freshwater aquatic life is 620 ug/l. (EPA 440/5-80-059)
Guideline Reference: Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Naphthalene
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-11-30 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161787, Naphthalene
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337688
 
Pollutant: Naphthalene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Naphthalene.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Drinking water notification levels are published by the Division of Drinking Water and are for chemicals for which there is no drinking water MCL. If a notification level is exceeded, local government notification is required and customer notification is recommended. The criteria for Naphthalene is 0.017 mg/L.
Guideline Reference: Drinking Water Notification and Response Levels: An Overview
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-11-30 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161788
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Nickel
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161788, Nickel
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337692
 
Pollutant: Nickel
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region?s Objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply uses of inland surface waters states that waters designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL). This is based upon drinking water standards specified in the following provisions of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations which are incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan: Table 64431-A of Section 64431 (Inorganic Chemicals), Table 64431-B of Section 64431 (Fluoride), Table 64444-A of Section 64444 (Organic Chemicals), Table 64449-A of Section 64449 (Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels-Ranges). The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 64431-A for nickel is 0.1 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161788, Nickel
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 341559
 
Pollutant: Nickel
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The nickel criterion for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 4.6 mg/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-12 and 2014-07-24
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161788, Nickel
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337690
 
Pollutant: Nickel
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The nickel criterion for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 4.6 mg/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161788, Nickel
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 341541
 
Pollutant: Nickel
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region?s Objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply uses of inland surface waters states that waters designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL). This is based upon drinking water standards specified in the following provisions of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations which are incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan: Table 64431-A of Section 64431 (Inorganic Chemicals), Table 64431-B of Section 64431 (Fluoride), Table 64444-A of Section 64444 (Organic Chemicals), Table 64449-A of Section 64449 (Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels-Ranges). The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 64431-A for nickel is 0.1 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-12 and 2014-07-24
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161788, Nickel
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337698
 
Pollutant: Nickel
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The nickel criterion for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 4.6 mg/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161788, Nickel
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337695
 
Pollutant: Nickel
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The dissolved nickel criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is hardness dependent. The criterion when calculated using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 52 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161788, Nickel
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 341563
 
Pollutant: Nickel
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The dissolved nickel criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is hardness dependent. The criterion when calculated using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 52 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-12 and 2014-07-24
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161788, Nickel
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 341557
 
Pollutant: Nickel
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region?s Objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply uses of inland surface waters states that waters designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL). This is based upon drinking water standards specified in the following provisions of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations which are incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan: Table 64431-A of Section 64431 (Inorganic Chemicals), Table 64431-B of Section 64431 (Fluoride), Table 64444-A of Section 64444 (Organic Chemicals), Table 64449-A of Section 64449 (Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels-Ranges). The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 64431-A for nickel is 0.1 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-12 and 2014-07-24
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161788, Nickel
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337702
 
Pollutant: Nickel
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region?s Objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply uses of inland surface waters states that waters designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL). This is based upon drinking water standards specified in the following provisions of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations which are incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan: Table 64431-A of Section 64431 (Inorganic Chemicals), Table 64431-B of Section 64431 (Fluoride), Table 64444-A of Section 64444 (Organic Chemicals), Table 64449-A of Section 64449 (Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels-Ranges). The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 64431-A for nickel is 0.1 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161788, Nickel
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 341561
 
Pollutant: Nickel
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The nickel criterion for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 4.6 mg/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-12 and 2014-07-24
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161788, Nickel
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5089
 
Pollutant: Nickel
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological survey sampled nickel under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Dissolved nickel concentrations in 4 samples ranged from less than 0.06 ug/L to 0.28 ug/L. The CTR standards were not exceeded.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Toxics Rule (CTR) freshwater aquatic life standards for nickel are dependent on hardness. At the hardness levels reported for this station, the acute (1-hour average) standard ranges from 234.01 to 336.75 ug/L. The chronic (4-day average) standard ranges from 32.69 to 37.44 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161788, Nickel
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5119
 
Pollutant: Nickel
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological survey sampled nickel under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Dissolved nickel concentrations in 4 samples ranged from less than 0.06 ug/L to 0.28 ug/L. The MCL was not exceeded.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The MCL for nickel is 100 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
73024
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

Six lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of 48 samples exceed the guideline for nitrate/nitrite as N.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. Zero of 48 samples exceeded the guideline and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 73024, Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99048
 
Pollutant: Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed STORET data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Nitrate + Nitrite as N.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate + nitrite (as N) that is incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 10.0 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-03-09 and 2012-08-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QAPP not required for federal data
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 73024, Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 97080
 
Pollutant: Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 7
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Nitrate + Nitrite as N.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water).
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate + nitrite (as N) that is incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 10.0 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (630EWK001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-06 and 2011-08-01
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 73024, Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 44326
 
Pollutant: Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate/Nitrite as N.
Data Reference: RWB6 Trend Monitoring CY2006 CY2007
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate + nitrite (as N) that is incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 10.0 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: Data for this line of evidence for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir was collected at 1 monitoring site [ East Walker River, at CA/NV state line]
Temporal Representation: Data was collected over the time period 8/14/2007-11/8/2007.
Environmental Conditions: Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information: 2002 QAMP (Quality Assurance Management Plan) for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 73024, Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5034
 
Pollutant: Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 16
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled this station under the Region 6 SWAMP program between 2001 and 2005. Concentrations of nitrite plus nitrate in 16 quarterly samples ranged from below detection level to 0.42 mg/L. One sample was an estimated value. The MCL was not exceeded.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The MCL for nitrite plus nitrate is 10 mg/L expressed "as nitrogen."
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Sixteen quarterly samples were collected between 2001 and 2005.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout. Boron in this watershed is from natural sources.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 73024, Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 98545
 
Pollutant: Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Nitrate + Nitrite as N.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water).
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate + nitrite (as N) that is incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 10.0 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (630EWK001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-09-13 and 2010-11-01
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 73024, Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 97250
 
Pollutant: Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 16
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 16 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Nitrate + Nitrite as N.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water).
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate + nitrite (as N) that is incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 10.0 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (630EWK001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-04-05 and 2015-10-15
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
 
DECISION ID
75810
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Nitrogen, Nitrite
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

Four lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the six samples exceed the guideline for nitrite.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. Zero of six samples exceeded the guideline and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 75810, Nitrogen, Nitrite
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99051
 
Pollutant: Nitrogen, Nitrite
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed STORET data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Nitrite as N.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Basin, Objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply uses of inland surface waters states the following: waters shall not contain concentrations of inorganic chemicals in excess of the limits specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Table 64431-A of section 64431 (Inorganic Chemicals). The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 64431-A for Nitrite as N is 1.0 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-12-08 and 2012-08-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QAPP not required for federal data
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 75810, Nitrogen, Nitrite
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 97141
 
Pollutant: Nitrogen, Nitrite
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Nitrite as N.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water).
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Basin, Objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply uses of inland surface waters states the following: waters shall not contain concentrations of inorganic chemicals in excess of the limits specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Table 64431-A of section 64431 (Inorganic Chemicals). The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 64431-A for Nitrite as N is 1.0 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (630EWK001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-09-13 and 2010-09-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 75810, Nitrogen, Nitrite
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7747
 
Pollutant: Nitrite as Nitrite NO2
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey collected one NO2-N sample under the Region 6 SWAMP program on 6/28/2002. The nitrite concentration was 0.011 mg/L. The MCL was not violated.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The MCL for nitrite is 1 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: One sample was collected on 6/28/2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 75810, Nitrogen, Nitrite
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 44346
 
Pollutant: Nitrite as Nitrite NO2
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrite as N.
Data Reference: RWB6 Trend Monitoring CY2006 CY2007
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Basin, Objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply uses of inland surface waters states the following: waters shall not contain concentrations of inorganic chemicals in excess of the limits specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Table 64431-A of section 64431 (Inorganic Chemicals). The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 64431-A for Nitrite as N is 1.0 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: Data for this line of evidence for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir was collected at 1 monitoring site [ East Walker River, at CA/NV state line]
Temporal Representation: Data was collected over the time period 8/14/2007-11/8/2007.
Environmental Conditions: Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information: 2002 QAMP (Quality Assurance Management Plan) for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
 
 
DECISION ID
161790
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Oxamyl (Vydate)
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161790, Oxamyl (Vydate)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337705
 
Pollutant: Oxamyl (Vydate)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxamyl.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for oxamyl is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 27 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic).
Guideline Reference: OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161790, Oxamyl (Vydate)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337706
 
Pollutant: Oxamyl (Vydate)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxamyl.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for Oxamyl incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 50 ug/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161824
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Paraquat
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161824, Paraquat
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337708
 
Pollutant: Paraquat
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Paraquat. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for paraquat is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.396 ug/L for a nonvascular plant (acute) for Paraquat dichloride.
Guideline Reference: OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161793
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Pentachlorophenol (PCP)
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161793, Pentachlorophenol (PCP)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337709
 
Pollutant: Pentachlorophenol (PCP)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Pentachlorophenol.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The pentachlorophenol criterion for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.28 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161793, Pentachlorophenol (PCP)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337711
 
Pollutant: Pentachlorophenol (PCP)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Pentachlorophenol.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The pentachlorophenol criterion for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 8.2 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161793, Pentachlorophenol (PCP)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337710
 
Pollutant: Pentachlorophenol (PCP)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Pentachlorophenol.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The pentachlorophenol criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is pH dependent. The criterion using a default pH value of 7.8 (when pH data is not present) is 15 ug/L. (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161816
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Propachlor
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161816, Propachlor
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337719
 
Pollutant: Propachlor
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Propachlor.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for propachlor is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 13.5 ug/L for a nonvascular plant (acute).
Guideline Reference: OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161816, Propachlor
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337718
 
Pollutant: Propachlor
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Propachlor.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The USEPA Health Advisory for propachlor as a drinking water level with a one in a million cancer risk is 0.001 mg/L.
Guideline Reference: 2018 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161795
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Propoxur
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161795, Propoxur
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337721
 
Pollutant: Propoxur
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Propoxur.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for propoxur is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 5.5 ug/L for invertebrates (acute).
Guideline Reference: OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161795, Propoxur
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337720
 
Pollutant: Propoxur
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Propoxur.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The USEPA Health Advisory for lifetime exposure to propoxur as a drinking water level is a concentration of 0.003 mg/L.
Guideline Reference: 2018 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161796
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Selenium
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161796, Selenium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337732
 
Pollutant: Selenium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Selenium. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The selenium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.005 mg/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161796, Selenium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5123
 
Pollutant: Selenium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled selenium under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Dissolved selenium concentrations in 3 of 4 samples were below the detection level. The concentration in the remaining sample was an estimated value. The CTR standards were not exceeded.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Toxics Rule (CTR) standards for protection of freshwater aquatic life are as follows: 4 day average = 5.0 ug/L; 1-hour average = 20 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161796, Selenium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99285
 
Pollutant: Selenium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Tissue
Matrix: Tissue
Fraction: Fish fillet
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Selenium. Data were collected for 1 fish species (1 composite(s) of Sacramento Blackfish each composed of 5 fish per composite).
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for SWAMP Sportfish Rivers and Streams.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The OEHHA Fish Contaminant Goal for selenium in fish tissue is 7.4 ppm. This screening level assumes an average body weight of 70 kg and a consumption rate of 32 g/day. A background dietary consumption rate of 0.114 mg/day is applied for this micronutrient. (Klasing, S., and R. Brodberg, 2008)
Guideline Reference: Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for Common Contaminants in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene
 
Spatial Representation: Data was collected from 1 station(s) with the station code(s): 630EWK002.
Temporal Representation: Data for this line of evidence were collected between 2011-08-29 and 2011-08-29
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161796, Selenium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7713
 
Pollutant: Selenium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological survey sampled selenium under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Concentrations of total selenium in 3 of 4 samples were estimated values, and the fourth sample was below the detection level. The MCL was not exceeded.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The MCL for selenium is 50 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161796, Selenium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337722
 
Pollutant: Selenium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Selenium.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for selenium incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 0.05 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161796, Selenium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337727
 
Pollutant: Selenium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Selenium.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for selenium incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 0.05 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161796, Selenium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337726
 
Pollutant: Selenium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Selenium. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The selenium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.005 mg/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161797
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Silver
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161797, Silver
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5061
 
Pollutant: Silver
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological survey sampled silver under the Region 6 SWAMP program. Four dissolved silver samples had concentrations less than 1.0 ug/L, the presumed detection limit. Per listing policy Section 6.1.5.5, the objective and CTR standards are presumed to be attained.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Toxics Rule standard for silver (for protection of freshwater aquatic life) is dependent on hardness. At the hardness values reported for this station, the instantaneous maximum standard ranges from 1.34 to 1.77 ug/L
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161797, Silver
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337738
 
Pollutant: Silver
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Silver.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region for silver is 0.1 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161797, Silver
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337735
 
Pollutant: Silver
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Silver.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region for silver is 0.1 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-12-02 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161797, Silver
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337742
 
Pollutant: Silver
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Silver. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 5 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The dissolved silver criterion maximum concentration (CMC) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is hardnesss dependent. The criterion when calculated using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 3.4 ug/L. This criterion was divided by 2 in order to better represent a CMC value as specified in footnote (g) of Table (b)(1) of the California Toxics Rule, 2000.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161797, Silver
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5064
 
Pollutant: Silver
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological survey sampled silver under the Region 6 SWAMP program. Four total silver samples had concentrations less than 0.05 ug/L, the detection limit. Per listing policy Section 6.1.5.5, the objective is presumed to be attained.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The MCL for silver is 100 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
161798
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Simazine
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161798, Simazine
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337743
 
Pollutant: Simazine
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Simazine.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for Simazine incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 4 ug/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161798, Simazine
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337744
 
Pollutant: Simazine
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Simazine.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for simazine is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 6 ug/L for a nonvascular plant (acute).
Guideline Reference: OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
102607
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Sodium
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

Four lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant, two that assess for MUN and two that assess for AGR. Three of 23 samples exceed the MUN guideline and zero of 23 samples exceed the AGR guideline for sodium.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. Three of 23 samples exceed the MUN guideline and zero of 23 samples exceed the AGR guideline and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 102607, Sodium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99027
 
Pollutant: Sodium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Agricultural Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed STORET data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Sodium.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Water Quality for Agriculture, published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations in 1985, contains criteria protective of various agricultural uses of water, including irrigation of various types of crops and stock watering. At or below the sodium threshold of 69 mg/L, agricultural uses of water should not be limited.
Guideline Reference: Water Quality for Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev 1, Rome (1985)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-03-09 and 2012-08-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QAPP not required for federal data
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 102607, Sodium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99028
 
Pollutant: Sodium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed STORET data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Sodium.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Per the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories (USEPA 2012), the health advisory for sodium for individuals on a sodium-restricted diet is 20 mg/l.
Guideline Reference: 2012 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-03-09 and 2012-08-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QAPP not required for federal data
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 102607, Sodium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 98489
 
Pollutant: Sodium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Agricultural Supply
 
Number of Samples: 19
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 19 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Sodium.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water).
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Water Quality for Agriculture, published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations in 1985, contains criteria protective of various agricultural uses of water, including irrigation of various types of crops and stock watering. At or below the sodium threshold of 69 mg/L, agricultural uses of water should not be limited.
Guideline Reference: Water Quality for Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev 1, Rome (1985)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (630EWK001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-10-22 and 2015-10-15
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 102607, Sodium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 98591
 
Pollutant: Sodium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 19
Number of Exceedances: 3
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 19 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Sodium.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water).
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Per the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories (USEPA 2012), the health advisory for sodium for individuals on a sodium-restricted diet is 20 mg/l.
Guideline Reference: 2012 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (630EWK001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-10-22 and 2015-10-15
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
 
DECISION ID
169948
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

Three lines of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of 13 samples exceed the water quality objective. The one exceeding data point calculated during the previous assessment cycle may have been calculated incorrectly.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. Zero of 13 samples exceeded the objective and this sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 26 samples are needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using table 3.2.
4. Pursuant to SECTION 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169948, Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 133527
 
Pollutant: Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Agricultural Supply
 
Number of Samples: 6
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Data were collected by the Region 6 SWAMP program between 2010 and 2015. Annual average SAR ratios ranged from 0.51 to 0.93. No SAR annual average exceeded the objective of 2. 2 samples of each analyte were thrown out in 2011 because of hold time violations.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water).
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The objective for Sodium Absorption Ratio (SAR) in the East Walker River (below Bridgeport Reservoir), as stipulated in the Lahontan Basin Plan 3-11, is a ratio not to exceed 2. SAR is calculated as Na/Sqrt((Ca+Mg)/2 in annual average fashion, and the formula uses milliequivalent (mEq) concentrations of each ion. To calculate mEq, the formula is (ion mg/L / molar mass)*valence.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: Data were collected from one station, 631EWK001, located at the CA/NV stateline.
Temporal Representation: Data were collected once in 2010 and 2011, and in quarterly fashion from 2012 to 2015.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Data were collected in accordance with the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169948, Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 351282
 
Pollutant: Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Agricultural Supply
 
Number of Samples: 6
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for this site and time period and 0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality objective for Sodium Absorption Ratio.
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region contains a site specific water quality objective for the Sodium Absorption Ratio for waterbodies of the East Walker River HUC applicable to this site, it is an annual average of no greater than 2.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Walker River, at CA/NV state line (630EWK001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between 2016-03-17 and 2021-11-23.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169948, Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 351283
 
Pollutant: Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Agricultural Supply
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for this site and time period and 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality objective for Sodium Absorption Ratio.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region contains a site specific water quality objective for the Sodium Absorption Ratio for waterbodies of the East Walker River HUC applicable to this site, it is an annual average of no greater than 2.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected 1 monitoring site: East Fork Walker River @ Stateline (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between 2014-05-12 and 2014-07-24.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: NDEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
168665
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Specific Conductivity
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

Six lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of 60 samples exceed the objective for specific conductance (MCL).

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. Zero of 60 samples exceeded the objective (MCL) and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 168665, Specific Conductivity
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 340675
 
Pollutant: Specific Conductivity
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 20
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 20 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity.
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Water designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) based upon drinking water standards specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's 'Chemical Constituents' objective. The California Secondary MCL for specific conductivity is 900 uS/cm.
Guideline Reference: California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15. Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630EWK001 (East Walker River, at CA/NV state line).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-17 and 2022-06-01
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 168665, Specific Conductivity
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5050
 
Pollutant: Specific Conductance
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 14
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey measured specific conductance under the Region 6 SWAMP program, at quarterly intervals between 2001 and 2005. Fourteen field measurements of specific conductance ranged from 144 to 271 uS/cm. An additional 6 laboratory measurements were taken for samples collected on the same dates as field measurements. Laboratory specific conductance ranged from 151 to 202 uS/cm. The MCL was not exceeded.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The MCL for specific conductance is 900 microsiemens per centimeter (uS/cm).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Fourteen quarterly field measurements and 6 laboratory measurements of specific conductance were taken between 2001 and 2005.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 168665, Specific Conductivity
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 44383
 
Pollutant: Specific Conductivity
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 9
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceed the criterion for Conductivity(Us).
Data Reference: RWB6 Trend Monitoring CY2006 CY2007
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region for specific conductance is 900 uS/cm (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: Data for this line of evidence for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir was collected at 1 monitoring site [ East Walker River, at CA/NV state line]
Temporal Representation: Data was collected over the time period 8/14/2007-12/26/2007.
Environmental Conditions: Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information: 2002 QAMP (Quality Assurance Management Plan) for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 168665, Specific Conductivity
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 97268
 
Pollutant: Specific Conductivity
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 26
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 26 samples exceeded the water quality standard for SpecificConductivity.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water).
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Water designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) based upon drinking water standards specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's \Chemical Constituents\" objective. The California Secondary MCL for specific conductivity is 900 uS/cm."
Guideline Reference: California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15. Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (630EWK001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-09-13 and 2015-10-15
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 168665, Specific Conductivity
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 341866
 
Pollutant: Specific Conductivity
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 10
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 10 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Water designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) based upon drinking water standards specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's 'Chemical Constituents' objective. The California Secondary MCL for specific conductivity is 900 uS/cm.
Guideline Reference: California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15. Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-03-09 and 2013-10-21
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 168665, Specific Conductivity
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 340597
 
Pollutant: Specific Conductivity
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity.
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Water designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) based upon drinking water standards specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's 'Chemical Constituents' objective. The California Secondary MCL for specific conductivity is 900 uS/cm.
Guideline Reference: California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15. Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630PS0163 (East Walker River ~1mi below Murphy Pond).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-06-15 and 2015-06-15
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
 
DECISION ID
161799
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Sulfates
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

Seven lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 65 samples exceed the water quality objective (MCL) for sulfate.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. Zero of the 65 samples exceed the water quality objective (MCL) for sulfate, and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161799, Sulfates
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 98594
 
Pollutant: Sulfates
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 20
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 20 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Sulfate.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water).
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region for Sulfate 250 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (630EWK001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-10-22 and 2015-10-15
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161799, Sulfates
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5052
 
Pollutant: Sulfates
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 7
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological survey sampled sulfate under the Region 6 SWAMP program between 2003 and 2005. Sulfate concentrations in 7 samples ranged from 5.1 to 23 mg/L. The MCL was not violated.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The MCL for sulfate is 250 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Seven samples were collected approximately quarterly between November 2003 and August 2005.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161799, Sulfates
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99030
 
Pollutant: Sulfates
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 6
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed STORET data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Sulfate.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region for Sulfate 250 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-03-09 and 2012-08-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QAPP not required for federal data
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161799, Sulfates
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 32235
 
Pollutant: Sulfates
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Zero of 2 samples exceeded the Secondary MCLs objective.
Data Reference: RWB6 Trend Monitoring CY2006 CY2007
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels (SMCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The SMCL for Sulfates (SO4) is 250 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels and Compliance. CCR Title 22 section 64449.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: Data were collected at the following station: 630EWK001-East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir.
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected on the following dates: 8/14/2007, 11/8/2007
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: 2002 QAMP (Quality Assurance Management Plan) for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161799, Sulfates
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 341930
 
Pollutant: Sulfates
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 11
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 11 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Sulfate.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region for Sulfate 250 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-01-22 and 2017-03-14
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161799, Sulfates
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 340732
 
Pollutant: Sulfates
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Sulfate.
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region for Sulfate 250 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630PS0163 (East Walker River ~1mi below Murphy Pond).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-06-15 and 2015-06-15
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161799, Sulfates
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 340753
 
Pollutant: Sulfates
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 18
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 18 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Sulfate.
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region for Sulfate 250 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630EWK001 (East Walker River, at CA/NV state line).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-17 and 2021-11-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
 
DECISION ID
161800
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Thallium
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161800, Thallium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337768
 
Pollutant: Thallium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Thallium.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for thallium incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 0.002 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161800, Thallium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337757
 
Pollutant: Thallium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Thallium.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The Gold Book states that thallium chronic toxicity to one species of fish occurs at concentrations as low as 20 ug/L after 2,6000 hours of exposure.
Guideline Reference: Quality Criteria for Water 1986. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Regulations and Standards. Washington D.C. EPA 440/5-86-001.
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161800, Thallium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7712
 
Pollutant: Thallium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled thallium under the Region 6 SWAMP program. Dissolved thallium concentrations in four samples were all below the detection limit. Per listing policy Section 6.1.5.5, the objective is presumed to be attained.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Lowest Observed Effect Levels (LOEL) criteria include an acute toxicity value of 1400 ug/L,and a chronic toxicity value of 40 ug/L. The criteria also include an "Other" limit of 20 ug/L based on 2600 hour exposure of one fish species.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Quality Criteria for Water 1986. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Regulations and Standards. Washington D.C. EPA 440/5-86-001.
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161800, Thallium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337753
 
Pollutant: Thallium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Thallium.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Thallium criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 6.3 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161800, Thallium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337762
 
Pollutant: Thallium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Thallium.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The Gold Book states that thallium chronic toxicity to one species of fish occurs at concentrations as low as 20 ug/L after 2,6000 hours of exposure.
Guideline Reference: Quality Criteria for Water 1986. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Regulations and Standards. Washington D.C. EPA 440/5-86-001.
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2022-02-08 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161800, Thallium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337764
 
Pollutant: Thallium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Thallium.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Thallium criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 6.3 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2022-02-08 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161800, Thallium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337763
 
Pollutant: Thallium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Thallium.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for thallium incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 0.002 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2022-02-08 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161800, Thallium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5124
 
Pollutant: Thallium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled thallium. under the Region 6 SWAMP program. Concentrations of total thallium in four samples were all below the detection level. Per listing policy Section 6.1.5.5, the objective is presumed to be attained.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The MCL for thallium is 2 ug/L.

The California Toxics Rule water and fish consumption standard (for waters designated MUN) is 1.7 ug/L
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
161825
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Thiobencarb
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161825, Thiobencarb
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337770
 
Pollutant: Thiobencarb
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Thiobencarb.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Maximum Contaminant Level for Thiobencarb incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 70 ug/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161825, Thiobencarb
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337769
 
Pollutant: Thiobencarb
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Thiobencarb.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The evaluation guideline for thiobencarb is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 1 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic).
Guideline Reference: OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
76597
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

Two lines of evidence, one which evaluates Dissolved Kjeldahl Nitrogen (DKN) data and one which evaluates Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) data are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of 2 DKN samples and 0 of 16 TKN samples exceed the water quality objectives.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfy the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfy the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. 0 of 16 TKN samples exceed the objectives and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in table 3.1.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 76597, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7748
 
Pollutant: Dissolved Kjeldahl Nitrogen
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey collected two samples under the Region 6 SWAMP program in August and November 2003. Concentrations of dissolved Kjeldahl nitrogen were 0.9 and 0.38 mg/L. No associated data on algae or macrophytes were available for assessment of compliance with the objective for biostimulatory substances.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: There are no site-specific objectives for dissolved Kjeldahl nitrogen. The Lahontan Basin Plan's narrative objective for biostimulatory substances states: "Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect the water for beneficial uses."
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Two samples were collected in August and November 2003.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 76597, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7749
 
Pollutant: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 16
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey collected 16 quarterly samples under the Region 6 SWAMP program between 2001 and 2005. Concentrations of total Kjeldahl nitrogen ranged from 0.37 to 3.1 mg/L. No associated data on algae or macrophytes were available for assessment of compliance with the objective for biostimulatory substances.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: There is no site-specific objective for total Kjeldahl nitrogen. The Lahontan Basin Plan's narrative objective for biostimulatory substances states: "Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect the water for beneficial uses."
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Sixteen quarterly samples were collected between 2001 and 2005.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
161801
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Toxaphene
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161801, Toxaphene
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337774
 
Pollutant: Toxaphene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Toxaphene. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The toxaphene criterion for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 0.00073 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161801, Toxaphene
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337776
 
Pollutant: Toxaphene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Toxaphene. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The toxaphene criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.0002 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161801, Toxaphene
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337775
 
Pollutant: Toxaphene
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Toxaphene. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The toxaphene criterion for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 0.00075 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161802
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Trichloroethylene/TCE
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161802, Trichloroethylene/TCE
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337777
 
Pollutant: Trichloroethylene/TCE
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Trichloroethylene.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The trichloroethylene criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 2.7 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-11-30 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161802, Trichloroethylene/TCE
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337778
 
Pollutant: Trichloroethylene/TCE
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Trichloroethylene.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Trichloroethylene criteria for the protection of human health from consumption of organisms only is 81 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-11-30 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161744
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Trichlorophenoxyacetic Acid, 2,4,5-
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161744, Trichlorophenoxyacetic Acid, 2,4,5-
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337779
 
Pollutant: Trichlorophenoxyacetic Acid, 2,4,5-
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Trichlorophenoxyacetic Acid, 2,4,5-.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The USEPA Health Advisory for lifetime exposure to trichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2,4,5- as a drinking water level is a concentration of 0.07 mg/L.
Guideline Reference: 2018 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161803
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Trifluralin
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: New Decision
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161803, Trifluralin
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337781
 
Pollutant: Trifluralin
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Trifluralin.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The USEPA Health Advisory for Trifluralin as a drinking water level with a one in a million cancer risk is 0.004 mg/L.
Guideline Reference: 2012 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161803, Trifluralin
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337780
 
Pollutant: Trifluralin
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Trifluralin.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: UC Davis Aquatic Life Criteria: Aquatic life should not be affected unacceptably if the four-day average concentration of Trifluralin does not exceed 0.33 ug/L in the water column more than once every three years on average (Bower, et al. 2017).
Guideline Reference: Water Quality Criteria Report for Trifluralin Phase III: Application of the pesticide water quality criteria methodology. Department of Environmental Toxicology University of California, Davis.
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-12-16 and 2020-11-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161812
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Vanadium
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161812, Vanadium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7715
 
Pollutant: Vanadium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled vanadium under the Region 6 SWAMP program. Concentrations of dissolved vanadium in four samples were all below the detection level. Per listing policy Section 6.1.5.5, the criterion is presumed to be attained.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: There are no state or federal standards or criteria for vanadium for the projection of freshwater aquatic life.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161812, Vanadium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7714
 
Pollutant: Vanadium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled vanadium under the Region 6 SWAMP program. Concentrations of total vanadium in four samples were all below the detection level. Per listing policy Section 6.1.5.5, the criterion is presumed to be attained.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Notification Level criterion for vanadium in drinking water is 50 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Drinking Water Notification and Response Levels: An Overview
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161812, Vanadium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337790
 
Pollutant: Vanadium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Vanadium.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Drinking water notification levels are published by the Division of Drinking Water and are for chemicals for which there is no drinking water MCL. If a notification level is exceeded, local government notification is required and customer notification is recommended. The criteria for Vanadium is 0.05 mg/L.
Guideline Reference: Drinking Water Notification and Response Levels: An Overview
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-12-02 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161812, Vanadium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337793
 
Pollutant: Vanadium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Agricultural Supply
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Vanadium.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Waters designated as AGR shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect the water for beneficial uses (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Water Quality for Agriculture, published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations in 1985, contains criteria protective of various agricultural uses of water. These criteria were used to translate narrative water quality objectives for chemical constituents that prohibit chemicals in concentrations that would impair agricultural uses of water. The 0.1 mg/L criteria is for the recommended maximum concentrations of vanadium in irrigation water
Guideline Reference: Water Quality for Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev 1, Rome (1985)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-12-02 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161812, Vanadium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337788
 
Pollutant: Vanadium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Agricultural Supply
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Vanadium.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Waters designated as AGR shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect the water for beneficial uses (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Water Quality for Agriculture, published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations in 1985, contains criteria protective of various agricultural uses of water. These criteria were used to translate narrative water quality objectives for chemical constituents that prohibit chemicals in concentrations that would impair agricultural uses of water. The 0.1 mg/L criteria is for the recommended maximum concentrations of vanadium in irrigation water
Guideline Reference: Water Quality for Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev 1, Rome (1985)
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-12-02 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161812, Vanadium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337791
 
Pollutant: Vanadium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Vanadium.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Drinking water notification levels are published by the Division of Drinking Water and are for chemicals for which there is no drinking water MCL. If a notification level is exceeded, local government notification is required and customer notification is recommended. The criteria for Vanadium is 0.05 mg/L.
Guideline Reference: Drinking Water Notification and Response Levels: An Overview
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-12-02 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161805
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Zinc
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161805, Zinc
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99053
 
Pollutant: Zinc
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed STORET data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Zinc.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The criterion in freshwater is hardness dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness dependent formula for the metals criterion.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-07 and 2012-08-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QAPP not required for federal data
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161805, Zinc
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5125
 
Pollutant: Zinc
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled zinc quarterly under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Dissolved zinc concentrations in three of four samples were below the detection level and the fourth sample was 2 ug/L. The CTR standards were not violated. .
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Toxics Rule (CTR) freshwater aquatic life standards for zinc are dependent on hardness. At the hardness levels reported for this station, the acute (1-hour average) standard ranges from 73.53 to 84.23 ug/L and the chronic (4-day average) standard ranges from 74.13 to 84.92ug/L.)
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161805, Zinc
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5126
 
Pollutant: Zinc
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled zinc under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Four total zinc samples had concentrations ranging from below the detection level to 2 ug/L. The MCL was not violated. .
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The MCL for zinc is 5000 ug/L.

The California Toxics Rule water and fish consumption standard (for waters designated MUN) is 1.7 ug/L
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161805, Zinc
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337796
 
Pollutant: Zinc
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Zinc.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The dissolved zinc criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is hardness dependent. The criterion when calculated using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 120 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161805, Zinc
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337803
 
Pollutant: Zinc
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Zinc.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region Objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply uses of inland surface waters states that waters designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL). This is based upon drinking water standards specified in the following provisions of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations which are incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan: Table 64431-A of Section 64431 (Inorganic Chemicals), Table 64431-B of Section 64431 (Fluoride), Table 64444-A of Section 64444 (Organic Chemicals), Table 64449-A of Section 64449 (Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels-Ranges). The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 64449-A for Zinc is 5 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161805, Zinc
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337798
 
Pollutant: Zinc
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Zinc.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region Objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply uses of inland surface waters states that waters designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL). This is based upon drinking water standards specified in the following provisions of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations which are incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan: Table 64431-A of Section 64431 (Inorganic Chemicals), Table 64431-B of Section 64431 (Fluoride), Table 64444-A of Section 64444 (Organic Chemicals), Table 64449-A of Section 64449 (Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels-Ranges). The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 64449-A for Zinc is 5 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161805, Zinc
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99054
 
Pollutant: Zinc
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed STORET data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Zinc.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region Objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply uses of inland surface waters states that waters designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL). This is based upon drinking water standards specified in the following provisions of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations which are incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan: Table 64431-A of Section 64431 (Inorganic Chemicals), Table 64431-B of Section 64431 (Fluoride), Table 64444-A of Section 64444 (Organic Chemicals), Table 64449-A of Section 64449 (Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels-Ranges). The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 64449-A for Zinc is 5 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-07 and 2012-08-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QAPP not required for federal data
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
 
DECISION ID
161794
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: pH
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161794, pH
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 129694
 
Pollutant: pH
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: 0 of 0 samples exceeded the water quality standard for pH. Although pH data does exist for this waterbody, the objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality standards could not be made.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water).
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: \In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.\""
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (630EWK001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-09-13 and 2015-10-15
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161794, pH
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 129853
 
Pollutant: pH
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: 0 of 0 samples exceeded the water quality standard for pH. Although pH data does exist for this waterbody, the objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality standards could not be made.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: \In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.\""
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-03-09 and 2012-08-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QAPP not required for federal data
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161794, pH
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 129743
 
Pollutant: pH
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: 0 of 0 samples exceeded the water quality standard for pH. Although pH data does exist for this waterbody, the objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality standards could not be made.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water).
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: \In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.\""
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (630EWK001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-09-13 and 2015-10-15
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161794, pH
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 129861
 
Pollutant: pH
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: 0 of 0 samples exceeded the water quality standard for pH. Although pH data does exist for this waterbody, the objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality standards could not be made.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: \In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.\""
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-03-09 and 2012-08-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QAPP not required for federal data
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161794, pH
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 339606
 
Pollutant: pH
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. The objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality thresholds could not be made.
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: 'In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.'
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630PS0163 (East Walker River ~1mi below Murphy Pond).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-06-15 and 2015-06-15
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161794, pH
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 339626
 
Pollutant: pH
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 20 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. The objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality thresholds could not be made.
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: 'In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.'
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630EWK001 (East Walker River, at CA/NV state line).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-17 and 2022-06-01
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161794, pH
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 33342
 
Pollutant: pH
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: There were 5 samples with pH ranging from 7.7 to 9.5. The normal ambient pH level for this water body is unknown and so it is unknown whether any exceedences occured.
Data Reference: RWB6 Trend Monitoring CY2006 CY2007
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The applicable objective states: "In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units." (Lahontan Basin Plan).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: Data were collected at the following station: 630EWK001 (East Walker River, at CA/NV state line).
Temporal Representation: Samples were collected between August and December 2007
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: 2002 QAMP (Quality Assurance Management Plan) for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161794, pH
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 339730
 
Pollutant: pH
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP Perennial Stream Surveys data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. The objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality thresholds could not be made.
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: 'In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.'
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630PS0163 (East Walker River ~1mi below Murphy Pond).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-06-15 and 2015-06-15
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161794, pH
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 339588
 
Pollutant: pH
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 20 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. The objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality thresholds could not be made.
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: 'In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.'
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630EWK001 (East Walker River, at CA/NV state line).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-17 and 2022-06-01
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161794, pH
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337717
 
Pollutant: pH
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. The objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality thresholds could not be made.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: 'In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.'
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-10 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161794, pH
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 348131
 
Pollutant: pH
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed 2007 RWB6 SWAMP East Walker River HU data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 15 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. The objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality thresholds could not be made.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: 'In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.'
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630EWK001 (East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2001-08-16 and 2005-08-24
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161794, pH
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 348130
 
Pollutant: pH
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed 2007 RWB6 SWAMP East Walker River HU data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 15 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. The objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality thresholds could not be made.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: 'In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.'
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 630EWK001 (East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2001-08-16 and 2005-08-24
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161794, pH
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337715
 
Pollutant: pH
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. The objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality thresholds could not be made.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: 'In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.'
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-10 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
 
DECISION ID
161778
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Iron
Final Listing Decision: List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Sources: A Source Unknown
TMDL Priority: Low
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

Fourteen lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of the 28 samples exceed the evaluation guideline for COLD. 6 of 28 samples exceed the MUN water quality objective (MCL).

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. 6 of 28 samples exceed the MUN water quality objective (MCL). and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161778, Iron
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 98557
 
Pollutant: Iron
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Iron.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water).
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region?s Objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply uses of inland surface waters states that waters designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL). This is based upon drinking water standards specified in the following provisions of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations which are incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan: Table 64431-A of Section 64431 (Inorganic Chemicals), Table 64431-B of Section 64431 (Fluoride), Table 64444-A of Section 64444 (Organic Chemicals), Table 64449-A of Section 64449 (Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels-Ranges). The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 64449-A for Iron is 0.3 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (630EWK001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-10-22 and 2011-07-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161778, Iron
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 44286
 
Pollutant: Iron
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Iron.
Data Reference: RWB6 Trend Monitoring CY2006 CY2007
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The Red Book states that based on field observations principally, a criterion of 1.0 mg/L iron for freshwater aquatic life is believed to be adequately protective (National Recommended Water Quality Criteria 2009).
Guideline Reference: National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology
 
Spatial Representation: Data for this line of evidence for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir was collected at 1 monitoring site [ East Walker River, at CA/NV state line]
Temporal Representation: Data was collected over the time period 8/14/2007-11/8/2007.
Environmental Conditions: Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information: 2002 QAMP (Quality Assurance Management Plan) for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161778, Iron
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99004
 
Pollutant: Iron
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed STORET data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Iron.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The Red Book states that based on field observations principally, a criterion of 1.0 mg/L iron for freshwater aquatic life is believed to be adequately protective.
Guideline Reference: Quality Criteria for Water. USEPA Office of Water and Hazardous Materials. Washington, D.C
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-03-09 and 2012-08-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QAPP not required for federal data
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161778, Iron
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5081
 
Pollutant: Iron
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological survey sampled iron under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Total recoverable iron concentrations in 4 samples ranged from 210 to 260 ug/L. The MCL was not violated.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The secondary MCL for iron is 300 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161778, Iron
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 44287
 
Pollutant: Iron
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 2
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Iron.
Data Reference: RWB6 Trend Monitoring CY2006 CY2007
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region's Objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply uses of inland surface waters states that waters designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL). This is based upon drinking water standards specified in the following provisions of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations which are incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan: Table 64431-A of Section 64431 (Inorganic Chemicals), Table 64431-B of Section 64431 (Fluoride), Table 64444-A of Section 64444 (Organic Chemicals), Table 64449-A of Section 64449 (Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels-Ranges). The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 64449-A for Iron is 0.3 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: Data for this line of evidence for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir was collected at 1 monitoring site [ East Walker River, at CA/NV state line]
Temporal Representation: Data was collected over the time period 8/14/2007-11/8/2007.
Environmental Conditions: Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information: 2002 QAMP (Quality Assurance Management Plan) for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161778, Iron
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 99006
 
Pollutant: Iron
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed STORET data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Iron.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region¦s Objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply uses of inland surface waters states that waters designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL). This is based upon drinking water standards specified in the following provisions of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations which are incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan: Table 64431-A of Section 64431 (Inorganic Chemicals), Table 64431-B of Section 64431 (Fluoride), Table 64444-A of Section 64444 (Organic Chemicals), Table 64449-A of Section 64449 (Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels-Ranges). The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 64449-A for Iron is 0.3 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-03-09 and 2012-08-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: QAPP not required for federal data
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161778, Iron
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 341384
 
Pollutant: Iron
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 6
Number of Exceedances: 3
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Iron.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Regions Objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply uses of inland surface waters states that waters designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL). This is based upon drinking water standards specified in the following provisions of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations which are incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan: Table 64431-A of Section 64431 (Inorganic Chemicals), Table 64431-B of Section 64431 (Fluoride), Table 64444-A of Section 64444 (Organic Chemicals), Table 64449-A of Section 64449 (Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels-Ranges). The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 64449-A for Iron is 0.3 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-12 and 2017-10-03
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161778, Iron
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337621
 
Pollutant: Iron
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 2
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Iron.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Regions Objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply uses of inland surface waters states that waters designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL). This is based upon drinking water standards specified in the following provisions of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations which are incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan: Table 64431-A of Section 64431 (Inorganic Chemicals), Table 64431-B of Section 64431 (Fluoride), Table 64444-A of Section 64444 (Organic Chemicals), Table 64449-A of Section 64449 (Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels-Ranges). The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 64449-A for Iron is 0.3 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161778, Iron
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337620
 
Pollutant: Iron
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Iron.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Regions Objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply uses of inland surface waters states that waters designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL). This is based upon drinking water standards specified in the following provisions of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations which are incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan: Table 64431-A of Section 64431 (Inorganic Chemicals), Table 64431-B of Section 64431 (Fluoride), Table 64444-A of Section 64444 (Organic Chemicals), Table 64449-A of Section 64449 (Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels-Ranges). The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 64449-A for Iron is 0.3 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-12-02 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161778, Iron
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337627
 
Pollutant: Iron
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Iron.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The Red Book states that based on field observations principally, a criterion of 1.0 mg/L iron for freshwater aquatic life is believed to be adequately protective.
Guideline Reference: Quality Criteria for Water. USEPA Office of Water and Hazardous Materials. Washington, D.C
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-04-04 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161778, Iron
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 341364
 
Pollutant: Iron
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 6
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Iron.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The Red Book states that based on field observations principally, a criterion of 1.0 mg/L iron for freshwater aquatic life is believed to be adequately protective.
Guideline Reference: Quality Criteria for Water. USEPA Office of Water and Hazardous Materials. Washington, D.C
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-12 and 2017-10-03
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161778, Iron
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 337625
 
Pollutant: Iron
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Iron.
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The Red Book states that based on field observations principally, a criterion of 1.0 mg/L iron for freshwater aquatic life is believed to be adequately protective.
Guideline Reference: Quality Criteria for Water. USEPA Office of Water and Hazardous Materials. Washington, D.C
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001 (East Fork Walker River @ Stateline).
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2020-12-02 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161778, Iron
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7710
 
Pollutant: Iron
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled iron under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Dissolved iron concentrations in two of four samples were estimated values. Dissolved iron concentrations in the remaining samples were samples 29 and 71 ug/L. The criterion was not violated.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's national freshwater aquatic life criterion for iron is a 4-day average of 1000 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: National recommended water quality criteria: 2002. EPA-822-R-02-047 Washington, D.C. USEPA
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 161778, Iron
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 98711
 
Pollutant: Iron
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Iron.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water).
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: The Red Book states that based on field observations principally, a criterion of 1.0 mg/L iron for freshwater aquatic life is believed to be adequately protective.
Guideline Reference: Quality Criteria for Water. USEPA Office of Water and Hazardous Materials. Washington, D.C
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s) (630EWK001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-10-22 and 2011-07-07
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
 
DECISION ID
163606
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Total Dissolved Solids
Final Listing Decision: List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status Revised
Sources: A Source Unknown
TMDL Priority: Low
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

10 lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of 15 samples exceed the MUN water quality objective and 11 of 31 samples exceed the site-specific objective for total dissolved solids.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. 11 of 31 samples exceed the site-specific objective for total dissolved solids and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation:
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163606, Total Dissolved Solids
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 96961
 
Pollutant: Total Dissolved Solids
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Data were collected by the Nevada Department of Environmental Protection at one site on the East Fork Walker River at the state line (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001) between 2011 and 2013. Concentrations in the raw data ranged from 89 to 165 mg/L. Three annual averages were computed and one of them exceeded the water quality objective.
Data Reference: Water quality data for federal, state, and tribal agencies submitted through the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database for the 2018 listing cycle.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The site specific objective for total nitrogen in the East Walker River, as referenced in the Lahontan Basin Plan table 3-15, is an annual average concentration not to exceed 145 mg/L. While this objective is written to apply to waters upstream of Bridgeport Reservoir, it is being used to assess the waters downstream of the reservoir in recognition of the East Walker River as an interstate water which provides critical water resources to western Nevada.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: Data were collected by the Nevada Department of Environmental Protection from one location (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001) located near the CA/NV state boundary.
Temporal Representation: Data were collected between March 2011 and October 2013 on an irregular basis.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: These are data from the US EPA STorage and RETrival (STORET) database that do not require a QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s): This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163606, Total Dissolved Solids
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5053
 
Pollutant: Total Dissolved Solids
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled TDS under the Region 6 SWAMP program at quarterly intervals between 2001 and 2005. Two different laboratory methods were used. TDS concentrations in 15 individual samples analyzed as "residue" ranged from 90 to 186 mg/L. Of two additional samples analyzed as "nonfilterable" , one was below detection level and the other was 11 mg/L. (The "residue" TDS concentration on the same date was 121 mg/L.) There were no violations of the annual average objective in five years of sampling.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The site-specific objective for Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) includes an annual average of 45 mg/L and a 90th percentile value of 160 mg/L (Lahontan Basin Plan Table 3-15).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Fifteen TDS samples analyzed as "residue" were collected between 2001 and 2005. Two additional samples collected in 2003 and 2004 were analyzed as "nonfilterable."
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163606, Total Dissolved Solids
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5054
 
Pollutant: Total Dissolved Solids
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 15
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled TDS under the Region 6 SWAMP program, at quarterly intervals between 2001 and 2005. TDS concentrations in 15 samples analyzed as "residue" ranged from 90 to 186 mg/L. One of two additional samples analyzed as "nonfilterable" had a TDS concentration below detection level; the other sample had a concentration of 11 mg/L. The MCL was not violated.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient surface waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The MCL for Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) is 500 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Fifteen TDS samples analyzed as "residue" were collected quarterly between 2001 and 2005. Two additional samples analyzed as "nonfilterable" were collected in 2003 and 2004..
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163606, Total Dissolved Solids
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 96867
 
Pollutant: Total Dissolved Solids
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 7
Number of Exceedances: 3
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Data were collected by Lahontan staff for the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) RWB6 Monitoring program, and for a supplemental TMDL Integrated Report Special Study. The TMDL Special Study was developed by Lahontan Planning and SWAMP staff to provide additional data to the quarterly SWAMP monitoring. The purpose was to gain a better temporal understanding of levels of specific pollutants in the waterbody. To ensure the two datasets could be viably analyzed as one, the TMDL Special Study followed the same sampling protocol as SWAMP. Accordingly, the two datasets have been combined for this assessment to reflect the intended design and to best characterize conditions in the watershed. Data for the projects were collected between September 2010 and December 2016 from one monitoring location. TDS concentrations ranged from 65 to 233 mg/L.
Data Reference: Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water).
  Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the TMDL Intergrated Report Special Study.
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The site specific objective for Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) in the East Walker River, as referenced by the Lahontan Basin Plan table 3-15 and incorporated because of the tributary rule to reflect the interstate nature of the waterbody, is an annual average not to exceed 145 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: Data were collected from one monitoring location, 630EWK001, which is located just upstream of the CA/NV stateline.
Temporal Representation: Data were collected between September 2010 and December 2016 with predominately a twice-per-quarter frequency. More visits were made to the site in the warmer months compared with winter months.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed's role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163606, Total Dissolved Solids
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 343373
 
Pollutant: Total Dissolved Solids
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows:
1 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Total Dissolved Solids
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Basin Plan objective for Total Dissolved Solids in this water body is 145 (mg/L), (as a Mean).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Walker River, at CA/NV state line (630EWK001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-09-10 and 2020-03-11
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163606, Total Dissolved Solids
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 343693
 
Pollutant: Total Dissolved Solids
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 2
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows:
2 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Total Dissolved Solids
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Basin Plan objective for Total Dissolved Solids in this water body is 145 (mg/L), (as a Mean).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Fork Walker River @ Stateline (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-01-22 and 2017-10-03
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163606, Total Dissolved Solids
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 343385
 
Pollutant: Total Dissolved Solids
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 2
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows:
2 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Total Dissolved Solids
Data Reference: Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Basin Plan objective for Total Dissolved Solids in this water body is 145 (mg/L), (as a Mean).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Walker River, at CA/NV state line (630EWK001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-17 and 2021-11-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163606, Total Dissolved Solids
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 343587
 
Pollutant: Total Dissolved Solids
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows:
0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Total Dissolved Solids
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Basin Plan objective for Total Dissolved Solids in this water body is 145 (mg/L), (as a Mean).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Fork Walker River @ Stateline (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-10 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163606, Total Dissolved Solids
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 343586
 
Pollutant: Total Dissolved Solids
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 2
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed Nevada Division of Environmental Protection data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows:
2 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Total Dissolved Solids
Data Reference: WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Basin Plan objective for Total Dissolved Solids in this water body is 145 (mg/L), (as a Mean).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Fork Walker River @ Stateline (21NEV1_WQX-NV09-301-EF-001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-01-10 and 2022-06-30
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Nevada DEP QAPP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Lahontan Water Board - NevadaDEP_QAPP - Nevada Division of Environmental Protection - 402633
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 163606, Total Dissolved Solids
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 343396
 
Pollutant: Total Dissolved Solids
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 1
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed TMDL Intergrated Report Special Study data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows:
0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Total Dissolved Solids
Data Reference: WQ from the Total Maximum Daily Load for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Basin Plan objective for Total Dissolved Solids in this water body is 145 (mg/L), (as a Mean).
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: East Walker River, at CA/NV state line (630EWK001)
Temporal Representation: The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-04-20 and 2017-10-04
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: Generic SWAMP QAPrP
QAPP Information Reference(s): Generic SWAMP QAPrP
 
 
DECISION ID
69434
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Sedimentation/Siltation
Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status Original
Sources: A Source Unknown
TMDL Priority: Low
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant was considered for placement on the section 303(d) list in a previous assessment cycle.

No new information was reviewed for this current assessment cycle. Therefore, the previous conclusion remains unchanged, and is as follows:

Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The original listing was based on best professional judgment regarding a single severe sedimentation incident. Water Board staff did not review quantitative data in connection with the listing.

The applicable narrative water quality objective is antidegradation based. The 16 quarterly SWAMP samples are insufficient to establish baseline and trend conditions as required for assessment under Section 4.10 of the Listing Policy.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfy the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used do not satisfy the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. Quarterly samples do not capture the full range of variability in streamflows and constituent concentrations expected in streams of the Lahontan Region. Flows and concentrations in this segment are also affected by the timing of releases from Bridgeport Reservoir.
3. The quarterly SWAMP data are insufficient to establish baseline and trend conditions as required under Section 4.10 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: This region was not assessed this cycle. All decisions have been carried over from the previous cycle and remain the same.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69434, Sedimentation/Siltation
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5051
 
Pollutant: Sediment
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 16
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological survey sampled suspended sediment under the Region 6 SWAMP program, at quarterly intervals between 2001 and 2005, and did load calculations based on concurrent flows. Suspended sediment concentrations in 16 samples ranged from 5 to 28 mg/L. Calculated sediment loads in 8 samples ranged from 0.37 to 23 tons/day. Sampling frequency is insufficient to evaluate compliance with the objective.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Lahontan Basin Plan's narrative objective states: ¿The suspended sediment load and suspended sediment discharge rate of surface waters shall not be altered in such a manner as to cause nuisance or adversely affect the water for beneficial uses.¿
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Sixteen quarterly samples were collected between 2001 and 2005.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 69434, Sedimentation/Siltation
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 4609
 
Pollutant: Sedimentation/Siltation
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Not Recorded
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 0
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006.
Data Reference: Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d)
 
SWAMP Data: Non-SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: Unspecified
Objective/Criterion Reference: Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Unspecified
Guideline Reference: Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d)
 
Spatial Representation: Unspecified
Temporal Representation: Unspecified
Environmental Conditions: Unspecified
QAPP Information: Unspecified
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
70138
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Calcium
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant was considered for placement on the section 303(d) list in a previous assessment cycle.

No new information was reviewed for this current assessment cycle. Therefore, the previous conclusion remains unchanged, and is as follows:

This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

Two of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. There are no California or federal standards or water quality criteria for calcium.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfy the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfy the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. There are no applicable standards or criteria and the data cannot be assessed pursuant to Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: This region was not assessed this cycle. All decisions have been carried over from the previous cycle and remain the same.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 70138, Calcium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7720
 
Pollutant: Calcium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled the East Walker River under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Concentrations of total calcium in four samples ranged from 16.9 to 18.6 mg/L.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: There are no state or federal standards or criteria for calcium for the protection of human health.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 70138, Calcium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7719
 
Pollutant: Calcium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled the East Walker River under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Concentrations of dissolved calcium in four samples ranged from 17 to 20 mg/L.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: There are no state or federal standards or criteria for calcium for the protection of freshwater aquatic life.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
71428
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Chromium (total)
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant was considered for placement on the section 303(d) list in a previous assessment cycle.

No new information was reviewed for this current assessment cycle. Therefore, the previous conclusion remains unchanged, and is as follows:

This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the samples exceed the water quality objective.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfy the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used do not satisfy the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. Quarterly samples do not capture the seasonal and annual variability expected in streamflows and constituent concentrations in streams of the Lahontan Region.
3. None of four samples exceeded the Califoria Toxics Rule standards or the Maximum Contaminant Level and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: This region was not assessed this cycle. All decisions have been carried over from the previous cycle and remain the same.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 71428, Chromium (total)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5748
 
Pollutant: Chromium (total)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The USGS sampled the East Walker River under the Region 6 SWAMP program. Concentrations of total chromium in four quarterly samples were all below the detection level. Under Listing Policy section 6.1.5.5 the MCL is presumed to be attained.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The MCL for chromium is 50 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 71428, Chromium (total)
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7695
 
Pollutant: Chromium (total)
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The USGS sampled the East Walker River under the Region 6 SWAMP program. Concentrations of dissolved chromium in four quarterly samples were all below the detection level. Under Listing Policy section 6.1.5.5 the standards are presumed to be attained.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The California Toxics Rule (CTR) standards for dissolved Chromium VI to protect freshwater aquatic life are11 ug/L ( 4-day average) and,16 ug/L (1 hour average). The CTR standard for Chromium III is hardness dependent. At the hardness levels reported for this station, acute (1 hour average) limits for Chromium III range from 349.71 to 398.82 ug/L. The chronic (4 day average) limits range from 113.41 to 129.37 ug/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
70688
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Hardness as CaCO3
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant was considered for placement on the section 303(d) list in a previous assessment cycle.

No new information was reviewed for this current assessment cycle. Therefore, the previous conclusion remains unchanged, and is as follows:

This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. There are no applicable state or federal standards or criteria. The hardness data assessed fall within the category generally considered "soft".

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used do not satisfy the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy in that only four quarterly samples were available. The minimum sample number requirements of Listing Policy Table 3.2 are not met.
3. There are no applicable standards or criteria.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: This region was not assessed this cycle. All decisions have been carried over from the previous cycle and remain the same.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 70688, Hardness as CaCO3
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7815
 
Pollutant: Hardness as CaCO3
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled the East Walker River under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Hardness values in four quarterly samples were 57.69, 67.73, 62.80, and 61.84 mg equivalent CaC03/L. These values are within the range characterizing "soft" water.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: There are no state or federal standards or criteria for hardness. Hardness is monitored for purposes such as determination of the applicable criteria and standards for metals whose toxicity is hardness-dependent. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's 1986 "Gold Book" includes generally accepted categories of hardness. Calcium and magnesium are the major ions contributing to hardness, and hardness is generally expressed as calcium carbonate. Water with a hardness equivalent to 0-75 mg equivalent CaCO3/L is considered "soft."
Objective/Criterion Reference: Quality Criteria for Water 1986. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Regulations and Standards. Washington D.C. EPA 440/5-86-001.
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 70688, Hardness as CaCO3
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7812
 
Pollutant: Hardness as CaCO3
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled the East Walker River under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Hardness values in four quarterly samples were 57.69, 67.73, 62.80, and 61.84 mg equivalent CaC03/L. These values are within the range characterizing "soft" water.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: There are no state or federal standards or criteria for hardness. Hardness is monitored for purposes such as determination of the applicable criteria and standards for metals whose toxicity is hardness-dependent. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's 1986 "Gold Book" includes generally accepted categories of hardness. Calcium and magnesium are the major ions contributing to hardness, and hardness is generally expressed as calcium carbonate. Water with a hardness equivalent to 0-75 mg equivalent CaC03/L is considered "soft."
Objective/Criterion Reference: Quality Criteria for Water 1986. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Regulations and Standards. Washington D.C. EPA 440/5-86-001.
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
70960
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Magnesium
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant was considered for placement on the section 303(d) list in a previous assessment cycle.

No new information was reviewed for this current assessment cycle. Therefore, the previous conclusion remains unchanged, and is as follows:

This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. There are no applicable standards, objectives or criteria for magnesium.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfy the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used do not satisfy the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. There are no applicable standards, objectives or criteria for evaluation of the four samples for dissolved magnesium or four samples for total magnesium and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: This region was not assessed this cycle. All decisions have been carried over from the previous cycle and remain the same.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 70960, Magnesium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7721
 
Pollutant: Magnesium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Dissolved
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled the East Walker River under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Concentrations of dissolved magnesium in four samples ranged from 3.7 to 4.32 mg/L.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: There are no state or federal standards or criteria for magnesium for the protection of freshwater aquatic life.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 70960, Magnesium
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7722
 
Pollutant: Magnesium
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Municipal & Domestic Supply
 
Number of Samples: 4
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey sampled the East Walker River under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2001 and 2002. Concentrations of total magnesium in four samples ranged from 3.64 to 4.09 mg/L.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: There are no state or federal standards or criteria for magnesium for the protection of human health.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Four quarterly samples were collected in 2001 and 2002.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
76096
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Phosphate
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant was considered for placement on the section 303(d) list in a previous assessment cycle.

No new information was reviewed for this current assessment cycle. Therefore, the previous conclusion remains unchanged, and is as follows:

This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. No biological data are available to evaluate whether any of the samples exceeds the water quality objective.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfy the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used do not satisfy the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. Quarterly samples do not capture the full range of seasonal and annual variability expected in streamflows and constituent concentrations in streams of the Lahontan Region.
3. No biological data are available for assessment of compliance with the water quality objective and the data cannot be assessed using Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: This region was not assessed this cycle. All decisions have been carried over from the previous cycle and remain the same.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 76096, Phosphate
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 7792
 
Pollutant: Phosphate
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 3
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological survey sampled the East Walker River under the Region 6 SWAMP program in 2002 and 2003. Concentrations of PO4-P in 3 samples ranged from 0.03 to 1.61 mg/L. No biological data are available for assessment of compliance with the objective for biostimulatory substances.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: There are no site specific numerical objectives for phosphate for this segment. The regionwide narrative objective for biostimulatory substances states:

"Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect the water for beneficial uses."
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Three quarterly samples were collected in 2002 and 2003.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
 
 
DECISION ID
79007
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Salinity
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the five samples exceed the water quality objective.

Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. None of the five samples exceeded the site specific objective for TDS of 145 mg/L which is used to assess the salinity data provided in this data set and this sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if standards are not met. A minimum of 26 samples is needed for application of table 3.2.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: This region was not assessed this cycle. All decisions have been carried over from the previous cycle and remain the same.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 79007, Salinity
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 34506
 
Pollutant: Salinity
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: Total
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: None of the 5 samples exceeded the site specific objective of 145 mg/L.
Data Reference: RWB6 Trend Monitoring CY2006 CY2007
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Regional Board will consider site specific adjustments to the objectives for wetlands (bacteria, pH, hardness, salinity, temperature, or other parameters) as necessary on a case-by-case basis. The site specific objective for Total Dissolved Solids at East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir is 145 mg/L and will be used to assess the salinity data provided in this data set.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: Samples collected from the 630EWK001 station.
Temporal Representation: Samples collected on the following dates: 10/30/2007 11/8/2007 9/18/2007 8/14/2007 12/26/2007
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information: 2002 QAMP (Quality Assurance Management Plan) for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
 
 
DECISION ID
79702
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
Pollutant: Temperature, water
Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: Pollutant
 
Regional Board Conclusion: This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.

Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. One of the 21 samples exceed the water quality objective., however, sampling frequency was not sufficient to determine the natural seasonal and annual temperature range or the extent to which changes occur due to human activities such as reservoir management (Bridgeport Reservoir).

The Lahontan Basin Plan's narrative temperature objective is an antidegradation-based objective that requires that there be no change in temperature in waters designated for the Cold Freshwater Habitat (COLD) beneficial use. The objective does not include specific numerical limits for protection of the COLD use. Listing Policy Section 3.10 contains directions for assessment based on trends in water quality. These directions include requirements to establish specific baseline conditions and specify the influence of seasonal and interannual effects.

There are not enough temperature samples to establish baseline conditions (including diel, seasonal, annual and interannual variations in temperature) or to detect declining trends in the temperature regime if such trends exist. Because temperature samples were collected only quarterly, weekly and monthly average data are not available for comparison with guidelines in the scientific literature for the temperature requirements of sensitive aquatic species such as salmonids, as directed in Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.9.


Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.

This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. One of the 21 samples exceeded the objective and this sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if standards are not met. A minimum of 26 samples is needed for application of table 3.2.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
 
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: This region was not assessed this cycle. All decisions have been carried over from the previous cycle and remain the same.
 
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
 
State Board Decision Recommendation: After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.
 
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 79702, Temperature, water
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 44264
 
Pollutant: Temperature, water
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 5
Number of Exceedances: 1
 
Data and Information Type: PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: Water Board staff assessed SWAMP data for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 5 samples exceed the criterion for Water Temperature.
Data Reference: RWB6 Trend Monitoring CY2006 CY2007
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region's water quality objective for all surface waters states the following: The natural receiving water temperature of all waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such an alteration in temperature does not adversely affect the water for beneficial uses. For waters designated COLD, the temperature shall not be altered.
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline: Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129).
Guideline Reference: Fish introductions in CA: History and impact on native fishes. Davis, CA: University of CA, Davis
 
Spatial Representation: Data for this line of evidence for East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir was collected at 1 monitoring site [ East Walker River, at CA/NV state line]
Temporal Representation: Data was collected over the time period 8/14/2007-12/26/2007.
Environmental Conditions: Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information: 2002 QAMP (Quality Assurance Management Plan) for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
QAPP Information Reference(s): Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
 
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 79702, Temperature, water
Region 6     
East Walker River, below Bridgeport Reservoir
 
LOE ID: 5055
 
Pollutant: Temperature, water
LOE Subgroup: Pollutant-Water
Matrix: Water
Fraction: None
 
Beneficial Use: Cold Freshwater Habitat
 
Number of Samples: 16
Number of Exceedances: 0
 
Data and Information Type: Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: The U.S. Geological Survey measured water temperature at quarterly intervals under the Region 6 SWAMP program between 2001 and 2005. Sixteen water temperature measurements ranged from 0 to 22.5 degrees Celsius. Sampling frequency was not sufficient to determine the natural seasonal and annual temperature range or the extent to which changes occur due to human activities such as reservoir management.
Data Reference: 2007. SWAMP Data for the West Walker River and East Walker River Hydrologic Units
 
SWAMP Data: SWAMP
 
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: The temperature objective in the Lahontan Basin Plan states: "The natural receiving water temperature of all waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such an alteration in temperature does not adversely affect the water for beneficial uses.

For waters designated WARM, water temperature shall not be altered by more than five degrees Fahrenheit ... above or below the natural temperature. For waters designated COLD, the temperature shall not be altered.

Temperature objectives for COLD interstate waters and WARM interstate waters are as specified in the 'Water Quality Control Plan for Control of Temperature in The Coastal and Interstate Waters and Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California' including any revisions."
Objective/Criterion Reference: Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended)
 
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
 
Spatial Representation: One station, East Walker River at the California-Nevada State Line, was sampled.
Temporal Representation: Sixteen quarterly samples were collected between 2001 and 2005.
Environmental Conditions: The East Walker River is an interstate river, influenced by geothermal springs, agricultural and highway drainage, and releases from Bridgeport Reservoir. Headwater streams originate near the Sierra Nevada crest. The state line is in an area transitional to Great Basin environmental conditions. The segment of the river between Bridgeport Reservoir and the state line supports a trophy brown trout fishery. In addition to the Cold Freshwater Habitat beneficial use, the East Walker River is designated for the Spawning, Reproduction and Development use and the Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species use. The latter designation reflects the watershed¿s role as habitat for the threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout.
QAPP Information: Data meet the quality assurance requirements of the SWAMP QAPP.
QAPP Information Reference(s):