Water Body Name: | Bijou Park Creek |
Water Body ID: | CAR6341003120110919092625 |
Water Body Type: | River & Stream |
DECISION ID |
162393 |
Region 6 |
Bijou Park Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Iron |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Sources: | A Source Unknown |
TMDL Priority: | Low |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Four lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 20 of 21 samples exceed the guideline for COLD. 28 of 20 samples exceed the MUN objective (MCL). Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 20 of 21 samples exceed the guideline for COLD. 28 of 20 samples exceed the MUN objective (MCL), and these both exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 338651 | ||||
Pollutant: | Iron | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 20 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 19 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed HeavenlyValley_TMDL data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 19 of 20 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Iron. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, WQ from the Total Maximum Daily Load for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The Red Book states that based on field observations principally, a criterion of 1.0 mg/L iron for freshwater aquatic life is believed to be adequately protective. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Quality Criteria for Water. USEPA Office of Water and Hazardous Materials. Washington, D.C | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: BPC-4 (Bijou Park Creek). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-10-03 and 2016-06-01 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Heavenly Resort QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - HeavenlyResortQAPP - HeavenlyValley_TMDL - 402557 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 338654 | ||||
Pollutant: | Iron | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 20 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 19 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed HeavenlyValley_TMDL data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 19 of 20 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Iron. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, WQ from the Total Maximum Daily Load for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Regions Objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply uses of inland surface waters states that waters designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL). This is based upon drinking water standards specified in the following provisions of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations which are incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan: Table 64431-A of Section 64431 (Inorganic Chemicals), Table 64431-B of Section 64431 (Fluoride), Table 64444-A of Section 64444 (Organic Chemicals), Table 64449-A of Section 64449 (Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels-Ranges). The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 64449-A for Iron is 0.3 mg/L. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: BPC-4 (Bijou Park Creek). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-10-03 and 2016-06-01 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Heavenly Resort QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - HeavenlyResortQAPP - HeavenlyValley_TMDL - 402557 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 31981 | ||||
Pollutant: | Iron | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | The annual average of iron at this station is 3.44 mg/L.
The Red Book states that based on field observations principally, a criterion of 1.0 mg/L iron for freshwater aquatic life is believed to be adequately protective (National Recommended Water Quality Criteria 2009). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's national freshwater aquatic life criterion for iron is a 4-day average of 1000 ug/L (1 mg/L). |
||||
Data Reference: | Data from discharger self-monitoring reports for the Heavenly Mountain Resort ski area at Lake Tahoe, Oct. 2007-Sep. 2009 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The maximum concentration of iron discharge to surface water is 0.5 mg/L. (This evaluation criteria is not approriate to evaluate protection of COLD. The 0.5 mg/L is an effluent limit that only applies to storm water discharges to surface waters in the Lake Tahoe Basin.)
The Red Book states that based on field observations principally, a criterion of 1.0 mg/L iron for freshwater aquatic life is believed to be adequately protective (National Recommended Water Quality Criteria 2009). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's national freshwater aquatic life criterion for iron is a 4-day average of 1000 ug/L (1 mg/L). |
||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at HV-C4 Bijou Park Creek below California Parking Lot. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected quarterly from the fourth quarter of 2008 to the third quarter of 2009. Additionally, three storm samples were collected. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Three storm samples were collected. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data were collected as part of Water Discharge Requirements R6T-2003-0032 for Heavenly Mountain Resort. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 31980 | ||||
Pollutant: | Iron | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 9 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 9 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants) | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | All nine of the samples exceeded the secondary MCL. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data from discharger self-monitoring reports for the Heavenly Mountain Resort ski area at Lake Tahoe, Oct. 2007-Sep. 2009 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Basin, Objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply uses of inland surface waters states the following: waters shall not contain concentrations of inorganic chemicals in excess of the limits specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Table 64449-B of Section 64449 (Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels-Ranges). The secondary MCL for iron is 0.3 mg/L. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at HV-C4 Bijou Park Creek below California Parking Lot. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected quarterly from the fourth quarter of 2008 to the third quarter of 2009. Additionally, three storm samples were collected. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Three storm samples were collected. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data were collected as part of Water Discharge Requirements R6T-2003-0032 for Heavenly Mountain Resort. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
162396 |
Region 6 |
Bijou Park Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Oil and Grease |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Sources: | A Source Unknown |
TMDL Priority: | Low |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for removal from the CWA section 303(d) List under section 4.2 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 26 of the 26 samples exceed the evaluation guidenline. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 26 of 26 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 339024 | ||||
Pollutant: | Oil and Grease | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 9 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 9 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed HeavenlyValley_TMDL data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 9 of the 9 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for OilandGrease; HEM. Although a total of 17 samples were collected, 8 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, WQ from the Total Maximum Daily Load for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Waters shall not contain oils, greases, waxes or other materials in concentrations that result in a visible film or coating on the surface of the water or on objects in the water, that cause nuisance, or that otherwise adversely affect the water for beneficial uses. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | According to EPA 'Gold Book', concentrations of oil at 0.001 mg/L can harm aquatic life. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Quality Criteria for Water 1986. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Regulations and Standards. Washington D.C. EPA 440/5-86-001. | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (BPC-4). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-10-03 and 2011-07-05 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Heavenly Resort QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - HeavenlyResortQAPP - HeavenlyValley_TMDL - 402557 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 34094 | ||||
Pollutant: | Oil and Grease | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 17 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 17 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | 17 of the 17 oil and grease samples exceeded the USEPA recommended criteria for this water body. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data from discharger self-monitoring reports for the Heavenly Mountain Resort ski area at Lake Tahoe, Oct. 2007-Sep. 2009 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Waters shall not contain oils, greases, waxes or other materials in concentrations that result in a visible film or coating on the surface of the water or on objects in the water, that cause nuisance, or that otherwise adversely affect the water for beneficial uses (Lahontan Region Water Quality Control Plan). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Per the Water Quality Criteria (USEPA 1986) also known as the Gold Book: concentrations of oil at 0.001 mg/l can harm aquatic life. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Quality Criteria for Water 1986. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Regulations and Standards. Washington D.C. EPA 440/5-86-001. | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at the following sample site: HV-C4 (Sky Mdw, California parking lot). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected monthly between August of 2008 and September 2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Data were collected for NPDES permit R6T-2003-0032. This data was collected under waste discharge requirements for a TMDL and therefore is of adequate quality. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
168920 |
Region 6 |
Bijou Park Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Phosphorus |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed with USEPA approved TMDL) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)(2018) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Sources: | A Source Unknown |
TMDL Name: | Lake Tahoe Nutrients/Sediment |
TMDL Project Code: | 198 |
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA: | 08/16/2011 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for removal on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 2.2 and 4.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 4.1 of the Policy, a minimum of one line of evidence is needed to assess listing status. Five lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 32 of 32 samples exceeded the objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List. There is sufficient justification to place it in the Being Addressed portion of the CWA 303(d) List because a TMDL has been completed and approved by RWQCB and USEPA, and is expected to result in attainment of the standard. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 32 of 32 samples exceeded the objective and these exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. The TMDL NAME was approved by USEPA on 08/16/2011. 5. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. The Lake Tahoe TMDL includes an implementation plan that identifies actions that resource management agencies must take to reduce inputs of nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) and fine sediment. The primary source of phosphorus in the Lake Tahoe (and Bijou Park Creek) watershed is urban storm water runoff and phosphorus associated with eroding sediment on disturbed undeveloped lands. The Tahoe TMDL implementation plan identifies actions that resource management agencies, Lake Tahoe municipalities (El Dorado and Placer Counties, and the City of South Lake Tahoe) and California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) must take to reduce inputs of nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) and fine sediment in urban runoff discharges. On the ground efforts required by the Lake Tahoe TMDL that focus on (1) stabilizing disturbed areas within the forested uplands, (2) restoring eroding stream channels, and (3) managing and treating urban uplands (e.g. street sweeping, installing and maintaining infiltration and stormwater treatment facilities) will also achieve pollutant load reductions in waters tributary to Lake Tahoe. Municipal Stormwater NPDES permits require the Lake Tahoe municipalities and CalTrans to develop and implement comprehensive pollutant load reduction programs (PLRPs) to meet specified pollutant load reduction requirements. Expected implementation measures include a variety of alternative treatment options, roadway operation practices, and local ordinances to reduce average annual pollutant loads. These Lake Tahoe TMDL implementation efforts will also reduce inputs of phosphorus to Bijou Park Creek. Maintenance activities and restoring small disturbed sites that are underway, or planned and expected, within the forested uplands of this watershed will also reduce or avoid increases in fine sediment and nutrient loads. Additionally, the Lake Tahoe TMDL also requires implementation of measures to control stationary sources of dust which help reduce pollutant loads of fine sediments. Implementation of these measures helps address the phosphorus loading that impairs Bijou Park Creek that is associated with these fine sediments from dust sources. Pollutant load reductions resulting from the implementation of management measures prescribed in the Lake Tahoe TMDL will be tracked through implementation of detailed performance and compliance measures and assessment and reporting protocols included in the Lake Tahoe TMDL. The TMDL Management System project is establishing activity-based tracking and reporting requirements to assess activities that are expected to reduce pollutant loading from non-urban sources. The Lahontan Water Board and the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection will implement a Lake Tahoe TMDL Management System for managing, tracking, integrating and evaluating new information generated from TMDL implementation actions, effectiveness monitoring, research efforts, and other factors such as climate change and wildfires. The Management System is based on an adaptive management framework to (1) link load reduction effectiveness with project implementation monitoring to improve project design and to assess if actual environmental improvement is occurring as expected; (2) establish guidance and operation protocols for how new information will be incorporated into project designs and TMDL program implementation; (3) establish prioritized TMDL research needs to fill data gaps and reduce uncertainties, and (4) implement a process for updating and reporting pollutant load reduction estimates and tracking projects within the TMDL implementation timeline. The Lake Tahoe TMDL requires implementation, effectiveness, and status and trends monitoring. Tributary stream status and trends monitoring will track long-term changes in water quality conditions relative to established water quality standards or goals, and project-specific monitoring will be used to assess the efficacy of various implementation measures. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | The Lake Tahoe TMDL includes an implementation plan that identifies actions that resource management agencies must take to reduce inputs of nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) and fine sediment. The primary source of phosphorus in the Lake Tahoe (and Bijou Park Creek) watershed is urban storm water runoff and phosphorus associated with eroding sediment on disturbed undeveloped lands. The Tahoe TMDL implementation plan identifies actions that resource management agencies, Lake Tahoe municipalities (El Dorado and Placer Counties, and the City of South Lake Tahoe) and California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) must take to reduce inputs of nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) and fine sediment in urban runoff discharges. On the ground efforts required by the Lake Tahoe TMDL that focus on (1) stabilizing disturbed areas within the forested uplands, (2) restoring eroding stream channels, and (3) managing and treating urban uplands (e.g. street sweeping, installing and maintaining infiltration and stormwater treatment facilities) will also achieve pollutant load reductions in waters tributary to Lake Tahoe. Municipal Stormwater NPDES permits require the Lake Tahoe municipalities and CalTrans to develop and implement comprehensive pollutant load reduction programs (PLRPs) to meet specified pollutant load reduction requirements. Expected implementation measures include a variety of alternative treatment options, roadway operation practices, and local ordinances to reduce average annual pollutant loads. These Lake Tahoe TMDL implementation efforts will also reduce inputs of phosphorus to Bijou Park Creek. Maintenance activities and restoring small disturbed sites that are underway, or planned and expected, within the forested uplands of this watershed will also reduce or avoid increases in fine sediment and nutrient loads. Additionally, the Lake Tahoe TMDL also requires implementation of measures to control stationary sources of dust which help reduce pollutant loads of fine sediments. Implementation of these measures helps address the phosphorus loading that impairs Bijou Park Creek that is associated with these fine sediments from dust sources. Pollutant load reductions resulting from the implementation of management measures prescribed in the Lake Tahoe TMDL will be tracked through implementation of detailed performance and compliance measures and assessment and reporting protocols included in the Lake Tahoe TMDL. The TMDL Management System project is establishing activity-based tracking and reporting requirements to assess activities that are expected to reduce pollutant loading from non-urban sources. The Lahontan Water Board and the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection will implement a Lake Tahoe TMDL Management System for managing, tracking, integrating and evaluating new information generated from TMDL implementation actions, effectiveness monitoring, research efforts, and other factors such as climate change and wildfires. The Management System is based on an adaptive management framework to (1) link load reduction effectiveness with project implementation monitoring to improve project design and to assess if actual environmental improvement is occurring as expected; (2) establish guidance and operation protocols for how new information will be incorporated into project designs and TMDL program implementation; (3) establish prioritized TMDL research needs to fill data gaps and reduce uncertainties, and (4) implement a process for updating and reporting pollutant load reduction estimates and tracking projects within the TMDL implementation timeline. The Lake Tahoe TMDL requires implementation, effectiveness, and status and trends monitoring. Tributary stream status and trends monitoring will track long-term changes in water quality conditions relative to established water quality standards or goals, and project-specific monitoring will be used to assess the efficacy of various implementation measures. |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 347881 | ||||
Pollutant: | Phosphorus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 7 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 7 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 7 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Phosphorus as P |
||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Phosphorus as P in this water body is 0.008 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Bijou Park Drainage at Hansen's Resort (SLT-BPDR-02) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2004-05-22 and 2013-05-11 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 347882 | ||||
Pollutant: | Phosphorus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 4 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 4 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 4 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Phosphorus as P |
||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Phosphorus as P in this water body is 0.008 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Bijou Park Drainage at Verdon Lane (SLT-BPDR-03) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2002-05-04 and 2021-05-15 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 347854 | ||||
Pollutant: | Phosphorus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 13 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 13 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed HeavenlyValley_TMDL data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 13 of 13 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Phosphorus as P |
||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, WQ from the Total Maximum Daily Load for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Phosphorus as P in this water body is 0.008 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Bijou Park Creek (BPC-4) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-09-27 and 2022-09-21 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Heavenly Resort QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - HeavenlyResortQAPP - HeavenlyValley_TMDL - 402557 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 347883 | ||||
Pollutant: | Phosphorus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 6 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 6 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 6 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Phosphorus as P |
||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Phosphorus as P in this water body is 0.008 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Bijou Park Drainage at Werner Salas Drive (SLT-BPDR-01) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2006-05-20 and 2013-05-11 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 31971 | ||||
Pollutant: | Phosphorus | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 2 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Both of the two annual averages exceeded the water quality objective for total phosphorus. Annual averages were calculated by water year starting in October 1st through September 30th. A total of 33 samples were collected. None of the individual samples showed concentrations meeting the annual average objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data from discharger self-monitoring reports for the Heavenly Mountain Resort ski area at Lake Tahoe, Oct. 2007-Sep. 2009 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Table 5.1-3 of the Basin Plan states that the water quality objective for total phosphorus for Trout Creek is an annual average objective of 0.008 mg/L. Bijou Park Creek is an upstream tributary of Lake Tahoe. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at HV-C4 Bijou Park Creek below California Parking Lot. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected from 10/23/2007 to 9/15/2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Phosphorus levels spiked during storm events that occurred one month apart. Seven samples were taken during storm events. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data were collected as part of Water Discharge Requirements R6T-2003-0032 for Heavenly Mountain Resort. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
162399 |
Region 6 |
Bijou Park Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Turbidity |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed with USEPA approved TMDL) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)(2018) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Sources: | A Source Unknown |
TMDL Name: | Lake Tahoe Nutrients/Sediment |
TMDL Project Code: | 198 |
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA: | 08/16/2011 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for removal on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 2.2 and 4.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 4.2 of the Policy, a minimum of one line of evidence is needed to assess listing status. Five lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 233 of 247 samples exceeded the water quality objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List. There is sufficient justification to place it in the Being Addressed portion of the CWA 303(d) List because a TMDL has been completed and approved by RWQCB and USEPA, and is expected to result in attainment of the standard. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 233 of 247 samples exceeded the water quality objective and these exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. The Lake Tahoe TMDL was approved by the USEPA on August 16, 2011. The implementation measures prescribed in the Lake Tahoe TMDL will also control inputs of suspended and dissolved particles that contribute to the turbidity in Bijou Park Creek. On-the-ground efforts required by the Lake Tahoe TMDL will also achieve pollutant load reductions in waters tributary to Lake Tahoe, including Bijou Park Creek. The Lake Tahoe TMDL includes an implementation plan that identifies actions that resource management agencies must take to reduce inputs of nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) and fine sediment. The primary source of phosphorus in the Lake Tahoe (and Bijou Park Creek) watershed is urban storm water runoff and phosphorus associated with eroding sediment on disturbed undeveloped lands. The Tahoe TMDL implementation plan identifies actions that resource management agencies, Lake Tahoe municipalities (El Dorado and Placer Counties, and the City of South Lake Tahoe) and California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) must take to reduce inputs of nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) and fine sediment in urban runoff discharges. On the ground efforts required by the Lake Tahoe TMDL that focus on (1) stabilizing disturbed areas within the forested uplands, (2) restoring eroding stream channels, and (3) managing and treating urban uplands (e.g. street sweeping, installing and maintaining infiltration and stormwater treatment facilities) will also achieve pollutant load reductions in waters tributary to Lake Tahoe. Municipal Stormwater NPDES permits require the Lake Tahoe municipalities and CalTrans to develop and implement comprehensive pollutant load reduction programs (PLRPs) to meet specified pollutant load reduction requirements. Expected implementation measures include a variety of alternative treatment options, roadway operation practices, and local ordinances to reduce average annual pollutant loads. These Lake Tahoe TMDL implementation efforts will also reduce inputs of fine sediment particles that contribute to the turbidity in Bijou Park Creek. Maintenance activities and restoring small disturbed sites that are underway, or planned and expected, within the forested uplands of this watershed will also reduce or avoid increases in fine sediment and nutrient loads. Additionally, the Lake Tahoe TMDL also requires implementation of measures to control stationary sources of dust which help reduce pollutant loads of fine sediments. Implementation of these measures helps address the phosphorus loading that impairs Bijou Park Creek that is associated with these fine sediments from dust sources. 5. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 340956 | ||||
Pollutant: | Turbidity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 8 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 8 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Water designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) based upon drinking water standards specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. The Lahontan Basin Plan also has regionwide turbidity objective for other beneficial uses that states: Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect the water for beneficial uses. Increases in turbidity shall not exceed natural levels by more than 10%. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient surface waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's 'Chemical Constituents' objective. The Secondary MCL for turbidity is 5 NTU. Calculation of a numeric objective for other beneficial uses requires comparison with upstream or other background data which may not be available as part of the data used for water quality assessment. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15. Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: SLT-BPDR-01 (Bijou Park Drainage at Werner Salas Drive). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2003-05-10 and 2019-05-18 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 340813 | ||||
Pollutant: | Turbidity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 6 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 5 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 5 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Water designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) based upon drinking water standards specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. The Lahontan Basin Plan also has regionwide turbidity objective for other beneficial uses that states: Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect the water for beneficial uses. Increases in turbidity shall not exceed natural levels by more than 10%. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient surface waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's 'Chemical Constituents' objective. The Secondary MCL for turbidity is 5 NTU. Calculation of a numeric objective for other beneficial uses requires comparison with upstream or other background data which may not be available as part of the data used for water quality assessment. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15. Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: SLT-BPDR-03 (Bijou Park Drainage at Verdon Lane). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2002-05-04 and 2021-05-15 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 32535 | ||||
Pollutant: | Turbidity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 17 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 15 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Fifteen of the 17 turbidity samples exceeded the MCL in this water body. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data from discharger self-monitoring reports for the Heavenly Mountain Resort ski area at Lake Tahoe, Oct. 2007-Sep. 2009 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's "Chemical Constituents" objective. The MCL for turbidity is 5 NTU. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Maximum Contaminant Levels for organic and inorganic chemicals. CCR Title 22 | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at the following sampling stie: HV-C4 (Sky Mdw, California Parking Lot) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected monthly between August of 2008 and September of 2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Data were collected for NPDES permit R6T-2003-0032. This data was collected under waste discharge requirements for a TMDL and therefore is of adequate quality. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 340851 | ||||
Pollutant: | Turbidity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 209 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 206 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed HeavenlyValley_TMDL data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 206 of 209 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, WQ from the Total Maximum Daily Load for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Water designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) based upon drinking water standards specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. The Lahontan Basin Plan also has regionwide turbidity objective for other beneficial uses that states: Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect the water for beneficial uses. Increases in turbidity shall not exceed natural levels by more than 10%. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient surface waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's 'Chemical Constituents' objective. The Secondary MCL for turbidity is 5 NTU. Calculation of a numeric objective for other beneficial uses requires comparison with upstream or other background data which may not be available as part of the data used for water quality assessment. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15. Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: BPC-4 (Bijou Park Creek). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-10-03 and 2022-09-21 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Heavenly Resort QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - HeavenlyResortQAPP - HeavenlyValley_TMDL - 402557 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 340973 | ||||
Pollutant: | Turbidity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 7 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 6 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 6 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Water designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) based upon drinking water standards specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. The Lahontan Basin Plan also has regionwide turbidity objective for other beneficial uses that states: Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect the water for beneficial uses. Increases in turbidity shall not exceed natural levels by more than 10%. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient surface waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's 'Chemical Constituents' objective. The Secondary MCL for turbidity is 5 NTU. Calculation of a numeric objective for other beneficial uses requires comparison with upstream or other background data which may not be available as part of the data used for water quality assessment. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15. Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: SLT-BPDR-02 (Bijou Park Drainage at Hansen's Resort). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2004-05-22 and 2019-05-18 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
DECISION ID |
168671 |
Region 6 |
Bijou Park Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Ammonia |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 338130 | ||||
Pollutant: | Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 3 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The total ammonia water quality objective to protect aquatic life in freshwater is temperature and pH dependent and is calculated according to the equation for the four-day criterion defined in Chapter 3 of The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: SLT-BPDR-03 (Bijou Park Drainage at Verdon Lane). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2002-05-04 and 2008-05-10 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 338174 | ||||
Pollutant: | Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 4 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The total ammonia water quality objective to protect aquatic life in freshwater is temperature and pH dependent and is calculated according to the equation for the four-day criterion defined in Chapter 3 of The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: SLT-BPDR-02 (Bijou Park Drainage at Hansen's Resort). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2004-05-22 and 2013-05-11 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 338260 | ||||
Pollutant: | Ammonia (Unionized) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 4 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The un-ionized ammonia water quality objective to protect aquatic life in freshwater is temperature and pH dependent and is calculated according to the equation for the four-day criterion defined in Chapter 3 of The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: SLT-BPDR-02 (Bijou Park Drainage at Hansen's Resort). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2004-05-22 and 2013-05-11 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 338205 | ||||
Pollutant: | Ammonia (Unionized) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 3 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The un-ionized ammonia water quality objective to protect aquatic life in freshwater is temperature and pH dependent and is calculated according to the equation for the four-day criterion defined in Chapter 3 of The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: SLT-BPDR-03 (Bijou Park Drainage at Verdon Lane). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2002-05-04 and 2008-05-10 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
DECISION ID |
162400 |
Region 6 |
Bijou Park Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Gasoline |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 338647 | ||||
Pollutant: | Gasoline | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed HeavenlyValley_TMDL data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Gasoline. Although a total of 20 samples were collected, 20 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, WQ from the Total Maximum Daily Load for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Waters shall not contain taste or odor-producing substances in concentrations that impart unsdeirable tastes or odors. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The threshold odor concentration for refined petroleum products is 5 ug/L. (McKee and Wolf, 1963) | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Compilation of Water Quality Goals | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: BPC-4 (Bijou Park Creek). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-09-27 and 2011-07-05 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Heavenly Resort QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - HeavenlyResortQAPP - HeavenlyValley_TMDL - 402557 | ||||
DECISION ID |
168708 |
Region 6 |
Bijou Park Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Indicator Bacteria |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336786 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 5 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 5 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): SLT-BPDR-01 (Bijou Park Drainage at Werner Salas Drive). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2008-05-10 and 2019-05-18 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336824 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): SLT-BPDR-03 (Bijou Park Drainage at Verdon Lane). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2021-05-15 and 2021-05-15 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336781 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 3 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 3 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): SLT-BPDR-02 (Bijou Park Drainage at Hansen's Resort). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2009-05-16 and 2013-05-11 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
DECISION ID |
162394 |
Region 6 |
Bijou Park Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Lead |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 338667 | ||||
Pollutant: | Lead | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 11 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed HeavenlyValley_TMDL data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 11 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead. Although a total of 20 samples were collected, 9 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, WQ from the Total Maximum Daily Load for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The dissolved lead criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is hardness dependent. The criterion when calculated using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 2.5 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (BPC-4). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-09-27 and 2011-07-05 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Heavenly Resort QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - HeavenlyResortQAPP - HeavenlyValley_TMDL - 402557 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 338664 | ||||
Pollutant: | Lead | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 15 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed HeavenlyValley_TMDL data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 15 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, WQ from the Total Maximum Daily Load for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's 'Chemical Constituents' objective. The MCL for lead is 15 ug/L. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: BPC-4 (Bijou Park Creek). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-10-03 and 2011-07-05 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Heavenly Resort QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - HeavenlyResortQAPP - HeavenlyValley_TMDL - 402557 | ||||
DECISION ID |
162395 |
Region 6 |
Bijou Park Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 234 samples exceed the water quality objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of 234 samples exceeded the objective and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 338806 | ||||
Pollutant: | Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 204 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed HeavenlyValley_TMDL data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 204 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate + Nitrite as N. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, WQ from the Total Maximum Daily Load for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate + nitrite (as N) that is incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 10.0 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: BPC-4 (Bijou Park Creek). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-10-03 and 2022-09-21 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Heavenly Resort QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - HeavenlyResortQAPP - HeavenlyValley_TMDL - 402557 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 31969 | ||||
Pollutant: | Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 30 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 30 samples exceeded the water quality objective for nitrate + nitrate as N. Samples collected within a 7-day period were averaged and considered as a single sample. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data from discharger self-monitoring reports for the Heavenly Mountain Resort ski area at Lake Tahoe, Oct. 2007-Sep. 2009 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Basin, Objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply uses of inland surface waters states the following: waters shall not contain concentrations of inorganic chemicals in excess of the limits specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Table 64431-A of section 64431 (Inorganic Chemicals). The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 64431-A for nitrate + nitrite as N is 10.0 mg/L. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at HV-C4 Bijou Park Creek below California Parking Lot. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected from 10/23/2007 to 9/15/2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Data were collected as part of Water Discharge Requirements R6T-2003-0032 for Heavenly Mountain Resort. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
169448 |
Region 6 |
Bijou Park Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Nitrogen, Nitrate |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Six lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 19 samples exceed the objective (MCL). Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of 19 samples exceeded the objective (MCL) and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 338950 | ||||
Pollutant: | Nitrate as Nitrate (NO3) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Not Recorded | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate as NO3. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The California Maximum Contaminant Level for Nitrate incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 45000 ug/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: SLT-BPDR-03 (Bijou Park Drainage at Verdon Lane). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2002-05-04 and 2006-05-20 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 338944 | ||||
Pollutant: | Nitrate as Nitrate (NO3) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Not Recorded | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate as NO3. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The California Maximum Contaminant Level for Nitrate incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 45000 ug/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: SLT-BPDR-01 (Bijou Park Drainage at Werner Salas Drive). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2009-05-16 and 2009-05-16 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 338942 | ||||
Pollutant: | Nitrate as Nitrate (NO3) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Not Recorded | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 6 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate as NO3. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The California Maximum Contaminant Level for Nitrate incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 45000 ug/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: SLT-BPDR-02 (Bijou Park Drainage at Hansen's Resort). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2004-05-22 and 2013-05-11 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 338873 | ||||
Pollutant: | Nitrogen, Nitrate | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate as N. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate (NO3 as N) incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 10.0 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: SLT-BPDR-02 (Bijou Park Drainage at Hansen's Resort). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-18 and 2019-05-18 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 338871 | ||||
Pollutant: | Nitrogen, Nitrate | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 4 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed HeavenlyValley_TMDL data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate as N. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, WQ from the Total Maximum Daily Load for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate (NO3 as N) incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 10.0 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: BPC-4 (Bijou Park Creek). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-04-21 and 2016-06-01 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Heavenly Resort QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - HeavenlyResortQAPP - HeavenlyValley_TMDL - 402557 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 339023 | ||||
Pollutant: | Nitrogen, Nitrite | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 5 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed HeavenlyValley_TMDL data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrite as N. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, WQ from the Total Maximum Daily Load for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Basin, Objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply uses of inland surface waters states the following: waters shall not contain concentrations of inorganic chemicals in excess of the limits specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Table 64431-A of section 64431 (Inorganic Chemicals). The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 64431-A for Nitrite as N is 1.0 mg/L. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: BPC-4 (Bijou Park Creek). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-04-07 and 2016-06-01 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Heavenly Resort QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - HeavenlyResortQAPP - HeavenlyValley_TMDL - 402557 | ||||
DECISION ID |
162397 |
Region 6 |
Bijou Park Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Oxygen, Dissolved |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Three lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Two of the 20 samples exceed the concentration objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Two of 20 samples exceeded the objective, and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 339242 | ||||
Pollutant: | Oxygen, Dissolved | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 8 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | For waters with the beneficial uses of COLD, COLD with SPWN, WARM, and WARM with SPWN, the minimum dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be less than that specified in Table 3-6. (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region) | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: SLT-BPDR-02 (Bijou Park Drainage at Hansen's Resort). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2006-05-20 and 2019-05-18 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 339036 | ||||
Pollutant: | Oxygen, Dissolved | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 6 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | For waters with the beneficial uses of COLD, COLD with SPWN, WARM, and WARM with SPWN, the minimum dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be less than that specified in Table 3-6. (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region) | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: SLT-BPDR-01 (Bijou Park Drainage at Werner Salas Drive). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2009-05-16 and 2019-05-18 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 339220 | ||||
Pollutant: | Oxygen, Dissolved | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 6 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | For waters with the beneficial uses of COLD, COLD with SPWN, WARM, and WARM with SPWN, the minimum dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be less than that specified in Table 3-6. (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region) | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: SLT-BPDR-03 (Bijou Park Drainage at Verdon Lane). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2002-05-04 and 2021-05-15 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
DECISION ID |
168630 |
Region 6 |
Bijou Park Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Specific Conductivity |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Three lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of the 30 samples exceed the water quality objective (MCL). Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of the 30 samples exceed the water quality objective (MCL) and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 340460 | ||||
Pollutant: | Specific Conductivity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 10 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 10 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Water designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) based upon drinking water standards specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's 'Chemical Constituents' objective. The California Secondary MCL for specific conductivity is 900 uS/cm. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15. Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: SLT-BPDR-02 (Bijou Park Drainage at Hansen's Resort). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2004-05-22 and 2019-05-18 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 340653 | ||||
Pollutant: | Specific Conductivity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 9 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Water designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) based upon drinking water standards specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's 'Chemical Constituents' objective. The California Secondary MCL for specific conductivity is 900 uS/cm. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15. Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: SLT-BPDR-03 (Bijou Park Drainage at Verdon Lane). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2002-05-04 and 2021-05-15 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 340570 | ||||
Pollutant: | Specific Conductivity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 11 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 11 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Water designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) based upon drinking water standards specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's 'Chemical Constituents' objective. The California Secondary MCL for specific conductivity is 900 uS/cm. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15. Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: SLT-BPDR-01 (Bijou Park Drainage at Werner Salas Drive). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2003-05-10 and 2019-05-18 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
DECISION ID |
162398 |
Region 6 |
Bijou Park Creek |
||
Pollutant: | pH |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 339524 | ||||
Pollutant: | pH | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 13 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. The objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality thresholds could not be made. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: 'In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.' | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: SLT-BPDR-01 (Bijou Park Drainage at Werner Salas Drive). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2003-05-10 and 2019-05-18 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 340083 | ||||
Pollutant: | pH | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 11 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. The objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality thresholds could not be made. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: 'In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.' | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: SLT-BPDR-02 (Bijou Park Drainage at Hansen's Resort). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2004-05-22 and 2019-05-18 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 339765 | ||||
Pollutant: | pH | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. The objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality thresholds could not be made. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: 'In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.' | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: SLT-BPDR-03 (Bijou Park Drainage at Verdon Lane). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2002-05-04 and 2021-05-15 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 339886 | ||||
Pollutant: | pH | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. The objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality thresholds could not be made. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: 'In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.' | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: SLT-BPDR-03 (Bijou Park Drainage at Verdon Lane). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2002-05-04 and 2021-05-15 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 340120 | ||||
Pollutant: | pH | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 11 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. The objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality thresholds could not be made. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: 'In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.' | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: SLT-BPDR-02 (Bijou Park Drainage at Hansen's Resort). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2004-05-22 and 2019-05-18 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 339666 | ||||
Pollutant: | pH | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data for Bijou Park Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 13 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. The objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality thresholds could not be made. | ||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: 'In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.' | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: SLT-BPDR-01 (Bijou Park Drainage at Werner Salas Drive). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2003-05-10 and 2019-05-18 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
DECISION ID |
162392 |
Region 6 |
Bijou Park Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Chloride |
Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Sources: | A Source Unknown |
TMDL Priority: | Low |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Five lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 29 of the 29 samples exceed the objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 29 of the 29 samples exceed the objective and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 347664 | ||||
Pollutant: | Chloride | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 13 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 13 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed HeavenlyValley_TMDL data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 13 of 13 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride |
||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, WQ from the Total Maximum Daily Load for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Chloride in this water body is 3 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Bijou Park Creek (BPC-4) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-09-27 and 2022-09-21 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Heavenly Resort QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - HeavenlyResortQAPP - HeavenlyValley_TMDL - 402557 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 347707 | ||||
Pollutant: | Chloride | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 2 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride |
||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Chloride in this water body is 3 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Bijou Park Drainage at Werner Salas Drive (SLT-BPDR-01) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-17 and 2019-05-18 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 347708 | ||||
Pollutant: | Chloride | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride |
||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Chloride in this water body is 3 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Bijou Park Drainage at Hansen's Resort (SLT-BPDR-02) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-18 and 2019-05-18 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 32534 | ||||
Pollutant: | Chloride | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 2 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | The annual averages from the sampling location in 2008 and 2009 this water body exceeded the water quality objective. One measurement was used to calculate the annual average for 2008 and 3 samples were used to calculate the annual average in 2009. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data from discharger self-monitoring reports for the Heavenly Mountain Resort ski area at Lake Tahoe, Oct. 2007-Sep. 2009 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The water quality objective is an annual average of 0.15 mg/L. (from Table 5.1-3 of the Lahontan Region Basin Plan). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at the following sampling stie: HV-C4 (Sky Mdw, California Parking Lot) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected once quarterly between August of 2008 and September of 2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Data were collected for NPDES permit R6T-2003-0032. This data was collected under waste discharge requirements for a TMDL and therefore is of adequate quality. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 347710 | ||||
Pollutant: | Chloride | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 11 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 11 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed HeavenlyValley_TMDL data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 11 of 11 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride |
||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, WQ from the Total Maximum Daily Load for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Chloride in this water body is 4 (mg/L), (as a 90th Percentile). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Bijou Park Creek (BPC-4) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-02-22 and 2021-12-15 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Heavenly Resort QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - HeavenlyResortQAPP - HeavenlyValley_TMDL - 402557 | ||||
DECISION ID |
168939 |
Region 6 |
Bijou Park Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Nitrogen |
Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Sources: | A Source Unknown |
TMDL Priority: | Low |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Seven lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Twenty-one of the 22 samples exceed the objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Twenty-one of 22 samples exceed the objective, and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 347811 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Nitrogen as N | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrogen, Total |
||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Nitrogen, Total in this water body is 0.15 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Bijou Park Drainage at Hansen's Resort (SLT-BPDR-02) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-18 and 2019-05-18 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 347767 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Nitrogen as N | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 13 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 13 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed HeavenlyValley_TMDL data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 13 of 13 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrogen, Total |
||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, WQ from the Total Maximum Daily Load for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Nitrogen, Total in this water body is 0.15 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Bijou Park Creek (BPC-4) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-09-27 and 2022-09-21 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Heavenly Resort QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - HeavenlyResortQAPP - HeavenlyValley_TMDL - 402557 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 31970 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Nitrogen as N | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 2 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Both of the two annual averages exceeded the water quality objective for total nitrogen. Annual averages were calculated by water year starting in October 1st through September 30th. A total of 34 samples were collected. None of the individual samples showed concentrations meeting the annual average objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data from discharger self-monitoring reports for the Heavenly Mountain Resort ski area at Lake Tahoe, Oct. 2007-Sep. 2009 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Table 5.1-3 of the Basin Plan states that the water quality objective for total nitrogen for Lake Tahoe is an annual average objective of 0.15 mg/L. Bijou Park Creek is an upstream tributary of Lake Tahoe. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at HV-C4 Bijou Park Creek below California Parking Lot. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected from 10/23/2007 to 9/15/2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Nitrogen levels spiked during storm events that occurred one month apart. Seven samples were taken during storm events. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data were collected as part of Water Discharge Requirements R6T-2003-0032 for Heavenly Mountain Resort. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 347814 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Nitrogen as N | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Not Recorded | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 2 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrogen, Total |
||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Nitrogen, Total in this water body is 0.15 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Bijou Park Drainage at Werner Salas Drive (SLT-BPDR-01) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-05-22 and 2013-05-11 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 347819 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Nitrogen as N | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrogen, Total |
||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Nitrogen, Total in this water body is 0.15 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Bijou Park Drainage at Werner Salas Drive (SLT-BPDR-01) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-05-18 and 2019-05-18 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 347817 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Nitrogen as N | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrogen, Total |
||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Nitrogen, Total in this water body is 0.15 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Bijou Park Drainage at Verdon Lane (SLT-BPDR-03) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2021-05-15 and 2021-05-15 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 347809 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Nitrogen as N | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Not Recorded | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 2 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrogen, Total |
||||
Data Reference: | Field, WQ from the Truckee Tahoe Snapshot Day for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Nitrogen, Total in this water body is 0.15 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Bijou Park Drainage at Hansen's Resort (SLT-BPDR-02) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2009-05-16 and 2013-05-11 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Tahoe Truckee Snapshot QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Lahontan Water Board - TahoeTruckeeSnapshotQAPP - League to Save Lake Tahoe Truckee Tahoe Snapshot D - 402634 | ||||
DECISION ID |
79152 |
Region 6 |
Bijou Park Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Temperature, water |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of 17 samples exceed the water quality objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of 17 samples exceeded the objective and this sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if standards are not met. A minimum of 26 samples is needed for application of table 3.2. 4. Pursuant to 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | This region was not assessed this cycle. All decisions have been carried over from the previous cycle and remain the same. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 32248 | ||||
Pollutant: | Temperature, water | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 17 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | None of the 17 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for temperature in this water body. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data from discharger self-monitoring reports for the Heavenly Mountain Resort ski area at Lake Tahoe, Oct. 2007-Sep. 2009 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The natural receiving water temperature of all waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such an alteration in temperature does not adversely affect the water for beneficial uses.(Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region) | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Fish introductions in CA: History and impact on native fishes. Davis, CA: University of CA, Davis | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at HV-C4 Bijou Park Creek below California Parking Lot. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected monthly between October of 2008 and September of 2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | This data was collected under waste discharge requirements for a TMDL and therefore is of adequate quality. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
75929 |
Region 6 |
Bijou Park Creek |
||
Pollutant: | Total Nitrogen as N |
Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL)(2016) |
Revision Status | Original |
Sources: | A Source Unknown |
TMDL Name: | Lake Tahoe Nutrients/Sediment |
TMDL Project Code: | 198 |
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA: | 08/16/2011 |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Two of the two samples exceed the water quality objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments addressed by USEPA approved TMDL category. Bijou Park Creek is tributary to Lake Tahoe. The Lake Tahoe TMDL was approved by the USEPA on August 16, 2011. The implementation measures prescribed in the Lake Tahoe TMDL will also control inputs of nitrogen to Bijou Park Creek. On-the-ground efforts required by the Lake Tahoe TMDL will also achieve pollutant load reductions in waters tributary to Lake Tahoe, including Bijou Park Creek. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Two of two samples exceed the objective (annual average; 34 individual samples used to get two annual averages) and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. 5. The largest source of nitrogen in the Lake Tahoe watershed (and the Bijou Park Creek watershed) is transportation-related emissions that lead to atmospheric nitrogen deposition. The Lake Tahoe TMDL includes implementation measures to reduce atmospheric nitrogen sources. The TMDL relies on the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency to lead efforts to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce overall vehicle miles traveled in the Lake Tahoe region to reduce emissions that lead to atmospheric nutrient loading. Public transit and vehicle fleet turnover are expected to further reduce nutrient-laden emissions in the Tahoe basin that will reduce nitrogen loading in the Bijou Park Creek watershed. Pollutant load reductions associated with control measures that are being implemented under the Lake Tahoe TMDL will be tracked through implementation of detailed performance and compliance measures and assessment and reporting protocols included in the Lake Tahoe TMDL. The TMDL Management System project is establishing activity-based tracking and reporting requirements to assess activities that are expected to reduce pollutant loading from non-urban sources. The Lahontan Water Board and the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection will implement a Lake Tahoe TMDL Management System for managing, tracking, integrating and evaluating new information generated from TMDL implementation actions, effectiveness monitoring, research efforts, and other factors such as climate change and wildfires. The Management System is based on an adaptive management framework to (1) link load reduction effectiveness with project implementation monitoring to improve project design and to assess if actual environmental improvement is occurring as expected; (2) establish guidance and operation protocols for how new information will be incorporated into project designs and TMDL program implementation; (3) establish prioritized TMDL research needs to fill data gaps and reduce uncertainties, and (4) implement a process for updating and reporting pollutant load reduction estimates and tracking projects within the TMDL implementation timeline. The Lake Tahoe TMDL requires implementation, effectiveness, and status and trends monitoring. Tributary stream status and trends monitoring will track long-term changes in water quality conditions relative to established water quality standards or goals, and project-specific monitoring will be used to assess the efficacy of various implementation measures. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | This region was not assessed this cycle. All decisions have been carried over from the previous cycle and remain the same. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | Pollutant load reductions associated with control measures that are being implemented under the Lake Tahoe TMDL will be tracked through implementation of detailed performance and compliance measures and assessment and reporting protocols included in the Lake Tahoe TMDL. The TMDL Management System project is establishing activity-based tracking and reporting requirements to assess activities that are expected to reduce pollutant loading from non-urban sources.
The Lahontan Water Board and the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection will implement a Lake Tahoe TMDL Management System for managing, tracking, integrating and evaluating new information generated from TMDL implementation actions, effectiveness monitoring, research efforts, and other factors such as climate change and wildfires. The Management System is based on an adaptive management framework to (1) link load reduction effectiveness with project implementation monitoring to improve project design and to assess if actual environmental improvement is occurring as expected; (2) establish guidance and operation protocols for how new information will be incorporated into project designs and TMDL program implementation; (3) establish prioritized TMDL research needs to fill data gaps and reduce uncertainties, and (4) implement a process for updating and reporting pollutant load reduction estimates and tracking projects within the TMDL implementation timeline. The Lake Tahoe TMDL requires implementation, effectiveness, and status and trends monitoring. Tributary stream status and trends monitoring will track long-term changes in water quality conditions relative to established water quality standards or goals, and project-specific monitoring will be used to assess the efficacy of various implementation measures. |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 31970 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Nitrogen as N | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 2 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Both of the two annual averages exceeded the water quality objective for total nitrogen. Annual averages were calculated by water year starting in October 1st through September 30th. A total of 34 samples were collected. None of the individual samples showed concentrations meeting the annual average objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Data from discharger self-monitoring reports for the Heavenly Mountain Resort ski area at Lake Tahoe, Oct. 2007-Sep. 2009 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Table 5.1-3 of the Basin Plan states that the water quality objective for total nitrogen for Lake Tahoe is an annual average objective of 0.15 mg/L. Bijou Park Creek is an upstream tributary of Lake Tahoe. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Samples were collected at HV-C4 Bijou Park Creek below California Parking Lot. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Samples were collected from 10/23/2007 to 9/15/2009. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Nitrogen levels spiked during storm events that occurred one month apart. Seven samples were taken during storm events. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data were collected as part of Water Discharge Requirements R6T-2003-0032 for Heavenly Mountain Resort. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||