Water Body Name: | Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) |
Water Body ID: | CAR6032028020170908057813 |
Water Body Type: | River & Stream |
DECISION ID |
162668 |
Region 6 |
Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) |
||
Pollutant: | Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Three lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 38 samples exceed the evaluation guideline for alkalinity. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of 38 samples exceeded the guideline and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 98240 | ||||
Pollutant: | Alkalinity as CaCO3 | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 22 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 22 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Alkalinity as CaCO3. | ||||
Data Reference: | Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Alkalinity as CaCO3 for the protection of freshwater aquatic life is not less than 20000 ug/L. (National Recommended Water Quality Criteria 2016) | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 2 monitoring site(s) (603BSP004, 603BSP021) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-22 and 2015-12-01 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 337893 | ||||
Pollutant: | Alkalinity as CaCO3 | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 8 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). | ||||
Guideline Reference: | National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 603BSP021 (North Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 337844 | ||||
Pollutant: | Alkalinity as CaCO3 | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 8 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). | ||||
Guideline Reference: | National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 603BSP004 (South Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
DECISION ID |
163810 |
Region 6 |
Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) |
||
Pollutant: | Boron |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Three lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Three of the ten samples exceed the site specific objective for boron. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Three of ten samples exceeded the objective and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 96227 | ||||
Pollutant: | Boron | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 6 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 3 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | A total of 20 discrete samples over three years were collected by Lahontan SWAMP staff from two monitoring locations on this waterbody segment. Annual averages were calculated for each monitoring site for 2013, 2014 and 2015. Of the six annual averages three attained the standard, and three exceed the standard of 0.04mg/L. | ||||
Data Reference: | Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The site-specific objective for boron in Bishop Creek as referenced in the Lahontan Basin Plan table 3-17, states that the annual average shall not exceed 0.04 mg/L. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality for Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev 1, Rome (1985) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Data were collected from two monitoring locations and the south and north channels of Bishop Creek, 603BSP004 & 603BSP021 respectively. These monitoring locations are found at the downstream end of each respective channel, before the waterbody empties into Bishop Canal. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Data were collected over a three year period, from May 2013 through December 2015, with predominantly once per quarter frequency. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Bishop Creek Forks spans from the bifurcation of the north and south channels upstream of the area known locally as West Bishop, to the respective terminus of each channel when they empty into Bishop Canal downstream of the City of Bishop. This waterbody consists of two discrete channels, but have been grouped together for assessment purposes based on their proximity to one another, their highly similar geology and similar land use impacts. The landscape surrounding the waterbody segment is used for grazing, residential property, urban uses and some crop growing. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data were collected in accordance with the 2008 SWAMP QAPP, 2013 amendment. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 342713 | ||||
Pollutant: | Boron | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Boron |
||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Boron in this water body is 0.04 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: North Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal (603BSP021) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 342716 | ||||
Pollutant: | Boron | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Boron |
||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Boron in this water body is 0.04 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: South Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal (603BSP004) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
DECISION ID |
163811 |
Region 6 |
Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) |
||
Pollutant: | Chloride |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 96228 | ||||
Pollutant: | Chloride | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 6 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | A total of 22 discrete samples over three years were collected by Lahontan SWAMP staff from two monitoring locations on this waterbody segment. Chloride concentrations ranged from 0.72 to 1.12 mg/L. The annual average, calculated for each site in 2013, 2014 and 2015, did not exceed the water quality objective in any instance. | ||||
Data Reference: | Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The site-specific objective for Chloride in Bishop Creek as referenced in the Lahontan Basin Plan table 3-17, states that the annual average shall not exceed 2.4 mg/L. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality for Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev 1, Rome (1985) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Data were collected from two monitoring locations and the south and north channels of Bishop Creek, 603BSP004 & 603BSP021 respectively. These monitoring locations are found at the downstream end of each respective channel, before the waterbody empties into Bishop Canal. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Data were collected over a three year period, from May 2013 through December 2015, with predominantly once per quarter frequency. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Bishop Creek Forks spans from the bifurcation of the north and south channels upstream of the area known locally as West Bishop, to the respective terminus of each channel when they empty into Bishop Canal downstream of the City of Bishop. This waterbody consists of two discrete channels, but have been grouped together for assessment purposes based on their proximity to one another, their highly similar geology and similar land use impacts. The landscape surrounding the waterbody segment is used for grazing, residential property, urban uses and some crop growing. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data were collected in accordance with the 2008 SWAMP QAPP, 2013 amendment. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 342737 | ||||
Pollutant: | Chloride | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride |
||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Chloride in this water body is 2.4 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: North Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal (603BSP021) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 342744 | ||||
Pollutant: | Chloride | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride |
||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Chloride in this water body is 2.4 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: South Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal (603BSP004) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
DECISION ID |
163812 |
Region 6 |
Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) |
||
Pollutant: | Fluoride |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 343005 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fluoride | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fluoride |
||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Fluoride in this water body is 0.12 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: South Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal (603BSP004) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-08-23 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 343009 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fluoride | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fluoride |
||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Fluoride in this water body is 0.12 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: North Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal (603BSP021) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-08-23 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 343010 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fluoride | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fluoride |
||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Fluoride in this water body is 0.12 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: South Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal (603BSP004) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-28 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 96229 | ||||
Pollutant: | Fluoride | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 6 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | A total of 22 discrete samples over three years were collected by Lahontan SWAMP staff from two monitoring locations on this waterbody segment. Fluoride concentrations ranged from 0.09 to 0.12 mg/L. The annual averages, calculated for each monitoring site in 2013, 2014 and 2015 did not exceed the water quality objective. | ||||
Data Reference: | Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The site-specific objective for fluoride in Bishop Creek as referenced in the Lahontan Basin Plan table 3-17, states that the annual average shall not exceed 0.12 mg/L. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality for Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev 1, Rome (1985) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Data were collected from two monitoring locations and the south and north channels of Bishop Creek, 603BSP004 & 603BSP021 respectively. These monitoring locations are found at the downstream end of each respective channel, before the waterbody empties into Bishop Canal. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Data were collected over a three year period, from May 2013 through December 2015, with predominantly once per quarter frequency. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Bishop Creek Forks spans from the bifurcation of the north and south channels upstream of the area known locally as West Bishop, to the respective terminus of each channel when they empty into Bishop Canal downstream of the City of Bishop. This waterbody consists of two discrete channels, but have been grouped together for assessment purposes based on their proximity to one another, their highly similar geology and similar land use impacts. The landscape surrounding the waterbody segment is used for grazing, residential property, urban uses and some crop growing. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data were collected in accordance with the 2008 SWAMP QAPP, 2013 amendment. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||
DECISION ID |
102558 |
Region 6 |
Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) |
||
Pollutant: | Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 22 samples exceed the guideline for nitrate/nitrite as N. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of 22 samples exceeded the guideline and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 98137 | ||||
Pollutant: | Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 22 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 22 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Nitrate + Nitrite as N. | ||||
Data Reference: | Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate + nitrite (as N) that is incorporated by reference in the Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region is 10.0 mg/L (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 2 monitoring site(s) (603BSP004, 603BSP021) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-22 and 2015-12-01 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program | ||||
DECISION ID |
168945 |
Region 6 |
Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) |
||
Pollutant: | Nitrogen |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 343057 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Nitrogen as N | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrogen, Total |
||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Nitrogen, Total in this water body is 0.7 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: South Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal (603BSP004) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 343054 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Nitrogen as N | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrogen, Total |
||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Nitrogen, Total in this water body is 0.7 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: North Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal (603BSP021) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 96230 | ||||
Pollutant: | Nitrogen | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 6 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | A total of 22 discrete samples over three years were collected by Lahontan SWAMP staff from two monitoring locations on this waterbody segment. Total nitrogen concentrations ranged from 0.07 to 0.16 mg/L. The annual averages, calculated for each monitoring site in 2013, 2014 and 2015, did not exceed the water quality objective in any instance. | ||||
Data Reference: | Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The site-specific objective for total nitrogen in Bishop Creek as referenced in the Lahontan Basin Plan table 3-17, states that the annual average for shall not exceed 0.7 mg/L. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality for Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev 1, Rome (1985) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Data were collected from two monitoring locations and the south and north channels of Bishop Creek, 603BSP004 & 603BSP021 respectively. These monitoring locations are found at the downstream end of each respective channel, before the waterbody empties into Bishop Canal. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Data were collected over a three year period, from May 2013 through December 2015, with predominantly once per quarter frequency. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Bishop Creek Forks spans from the bifurcation of the north and south channels upstream of the area known locally as West Bishop, to the respective terminus of each channel when they empty into Bishop Canal downstream of the City of Bishop. This waterbody consists of two discrete channels, but have been grouped together for assessment purposes based on their proximity to one another, their highly similar geology and similar land use impacts. The landscape surrounding the waterbody segment is used for grazing, residential property, urban uses and some crop growing. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data were collected in accordance with the 2008 SWAMP QAPP, 2013 amendment. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water). | ||||
DECISION ID |
169390 |
Region 6 |
Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) |
||
Pollutant: | Nitrogen, Nitrate |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 343021 | ||||
Pollutant: | Nitrogen, Nitrate | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate as N |
||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Nitrate as N in this water body is 0.5 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: South Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal (603BSP004) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-28 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
DECISION ID |
163815 |
Region 6 |
Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) |
||
Pollutant: | Orthophosphate |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 343180 | ||||
Pollutant: | Orthophosphate | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for OrthoPhosphate as P |
||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for OrthoPhosphate as P in this water body is 0.09 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: South Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal (603BSP004) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 343181 | ||||
Pollutant: | Orthophosphate | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for OrthoPhosphate as P |
||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for OrthoPhosphate as P in this water body is 0.09 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: North Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal (603BSP021) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
DECISION ID |
162664 |
Region 6 |
Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) |
||
Pollutant: | Oxygen, Dissolved |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Six lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this parameter: 3 which assess dissolved oxygen concentration data and 3 which assess dissolved oxygen percent saturation data. Zero of 16 samples are below the objective for minimum dissolved oxygen concentration. Two of 16 samples are below the objective for minimum dissolved oxygen percent saturation. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of 16 samples are below the objective for minimum dissolved oxygen concentration. Two of 16 samples are below the objective for minimum dissolved oxygen percent saturation. This does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 339047 | ||||
Pollutant: | Oxygen, Dissolved | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 7 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | For waters with the beneficial uses of COLD, COLD with SPWN, WARM, and WARM with SPWN, the minimum dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be less than that specified in Table 3-6. (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region) | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 603BSP004 (South Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-24 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 130030 | ||||
Pollutant: | Oxygen, Dissolved | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Oxygen, Saturation. | ||||
Data Reference: | Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region's water quality objective states that the dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be less than 80 percent of saturation. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 2 monitoring site(s) (603BSP004, 603BSP021) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-22 and 2013-05-22 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 130051 | ||||
Pollutant: | Oxygen, Dissolved | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Oxygen, Dissolved. | ||||
Data Reference: | Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | For waters with the beneficial uses of COLD, COLD with SPWN, WARM, and WARM with SPWN, the minimum dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be less than that specified in Table 3-6. (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region) | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 2 monitoring site(s) (603BSP004, 603BSP021) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-22 and 2013-05-22 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 339348 | ||||
Pollutant: | Oxygen, Dissolved | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 7 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Saturation. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region's water quality objective states that the dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be less than 80 percent of saturation. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 603BSP004 (South Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-24 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 339054 | ||||
Pollutant: | Oxygen, Dissolved | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 7 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | For waters with the beneficial uses of COLD, COLD with SPWN, WARM, and WARM with SPWN, the minimum dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be less than that specified in Table 3-6. (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region) | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 603BSP021 (North Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-24 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 339384 | ||||
Pollutant: | Oxygen, Dissolved | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 7 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Saturation. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region's water quality objective states that the dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be less than 80 percent of saturation. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 603BSP021 (North Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-05-24 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
DECISION ID |
102562 |
Region 6 |
Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) |
||
Pollutant: | Phosphate |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | New Decision |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the six samples exceed the site specific objective for orthophosphate. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of six samples exceeded the objective and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 96231 | ||||
Pollutant: | Orthophosphate | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 6 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | A total of 22 discrete samples over three years were collected by Lahontan SWAMP staff from two monitoring locations on this waterbody segment. Orthophosphate concentrations ranged from 0.011 to 0.014 mg/L. The annual averages, calculated for 2013, 2014 and 2015 for each site, did not exceed the water quality objective in any instance. | ||||
Data Reference: | Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The site-specific objective for orthophosphate in Bishop Creek as referenced in the Lahontan Basin Plan table 3-17, states that the annual average shall not exceed 0.09 mg/L. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality for Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev 1, Rome (1985) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | Data were collected from two monitoring locations and the south and north channels of Bishop Creek, 603BSP004 & 603BSP021 respectively. These monitoring locations are found at the downstream end of each respective channel, before the waterbody empties into Bishop Canal. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Data were collected over a three year period, from May 2013 through December 2015, with predominantly once per quarter frequency. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Bishop Creek Forks spans from the bifurcation of the north and south channels upstream of the area known locally as West Bishop, to the respective terminus of each channel when they empty into Bishop Canal downstream of the City of Bishop. This waterbody consists of two discrete channels, but have been grouped together for assessment purposes based on their proximity to one another, their highly similar geology and similar land use impacts. The landscape surrounding the waterbody segment is used for grazing, residential property, urban uses and some crop growing. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data were collected in accordance with the 2008 SWAMP QAPP, 2013 amendment. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water). | ||||
DECISION ID |
162666 |
Region 6 |
Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) |
||
Pollutant: | Sodium |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Six lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant that are both based on the same dataset assessed for MUN and AGR. Zero of 37 samples exceed the AGR guideline and zero of 37 samples exceed the MUN guideline for sodium. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of 37 samples exceed the AGR guideline and zero of 37 samples exceed the MUN guideline, and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 340268 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sodium | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 8 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Sodium. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Per the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories (USEPA 2012), the health advisory for sodium for individuals on a sodium-restricted diet is 20 mg/l. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | 2012 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 603BSP004 (South Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 97035 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sodium | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Agricultural Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 21 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 21 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Sodium. | ||||
Data Reference: | Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Water Quality for Agriculture, published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations in 1985, contains criteria protective of various agricultural uses of water, including irrigation of various types of crops and stock watering. At or below the sodium threshold of 69 mg/L, agricultural uses of water should not be limited. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality for Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev 1, Rome (1985) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 2 monitoring site(s) (603BSP004, 603BSP021) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-22 and 2015-12-01 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 340313 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sodium | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 8 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Sodium. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Per the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories (USEPA 2012), the health advisory for sodium for individuals on a sodium-restricted diet is 20 mg/l. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | 2012 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 603BSP021 (North Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 340309 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sodium | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Agricultural Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 8 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Sodium. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Water Quality for Agriculture, published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations in 1985, contains criteria protective of various agricultural uses of water, including irrigation of various types of crops and stock watering. At or below the sodium threshold of 69 mg/L, agricultural uses of water should not be limited. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality for Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev 1, Rome (1985) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 603BSP021 (North Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 340289 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sodium | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Agricultural Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 8 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Sodium. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Water Quality for Agriculture, published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations in 1985, contains criteria protective of various agricultural uses of water, including irrigation of various types of crops and stock watering. At or below the sodium threshold of 69 mg/L, agricultural uses of water should not be limited. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | Water Quality for Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev 1, Rome (1985) | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 603BSP004 (South Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 98165 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sodium | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 21 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 21 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Sodium. | ||||
Data Reference: | Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | Per the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories (USEPA 2012), the health advisory for sodium for individuals on a sodium-restricted diet is 20 mg/l. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | 2012 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 2 monitoring site(s) (603BSP004, 603BSP021) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-22 and 2015-12-01 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program | ||||
DECISION ID |
168634 |
Region 6 |
Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) |
||
Pollutant: | Specific Conductivity |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Three line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 42 samples exceed the objective for specific conductivity (MCL). Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of 46 samples exceeded the guideline and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 97262 | ||||
Pollutant: | Specific Conductivity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 22 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 22 samples exceeded the water quality standard for SpecificConductivity. | ||||
Data Reference: | Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Water designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) based upon drinking water standards specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's \Chemical Constituents\" objective. The California Secondary MCL for specific conductivity is 900 uS/cm." | ||||
Guideline Reference: | California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15. Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 2 monitoring site(s) (603BSP004, 603BSP021) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-22 and 2015-12-01 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 340345 | ||||
Pollutant: | Specific Conductivity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 8 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Water designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) based upon drinking water standards specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's 'Chemical Constituents' objective. The California Secondary MCL for specific conductivity is 900 uS/cm. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15. Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 603BSP021 (North Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 340403 | ||||
Pollutant: | Specific Conductivity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 8 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Water designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) based upon drinking water standards specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's 'Chemical Constituents' objective. The California Secondary MCL for specific conductivity is 900 uS/cm. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15. Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 603BSP004 (South Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
DECISION ID |
163813 |
Region 6 |
Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) |
||
Pollutant: | Sulfates |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 343307 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sulfates | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Sulfate |
||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Sulfate in this water body is 7.2 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: South Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal (603BSP004) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-08-23 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 343308 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sulfates | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Sulfate |
||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Sulfate in this water body is 7.2 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: North Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal (603BSP021) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-08-23 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 343330 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sulfates | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Sulfate |
||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Sulfate in this water body is 7.2 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: North Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal (603BSP021) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-28 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 96232 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sulfates | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 6 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | A total of 22 discrete samples over three years were collected by Lahontan SWAMP staff at two monitoring locations on this waterbody segment. Sulfate concentrations ranged from 5.11 to 7.2 mg/L. The annual averages, calculated for 2013, 2014 and 2015 for each monitoring site, did not exceed the water quality objective in any instance. | ||||
Data Reference: | Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The site-specific objective for sulfates in Bishop Creek as referenced in the Lahontan Basin Plan table 3-17, states that the annual average shall not exceed 7.2 mg/L. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Data were collected from two monitoring locations and the south and north channels of Bishop Creek, 603BSP004 & 603BSP021 respectively. These monitoring locations are found at the downstream end of each respective channel, before the waterbody empties into Bishop Canal. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Data were collected over a three year period, from May 2013 through December 2015, with predominantly once per quarter frequency. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Bishop Creek Forks spans from the bifurcation of the north and south channels upstream of the area known locally as West Bishop, to the respective terminus of each channel when they empty into Bishop Canal downstream of the City of Bishop. This waterbody consists of two discrete channels, but have been grouped together for assessment purposes based on their proximity to one another, their highly similar geology and similar land use impacts. The landscape surrounding the waterbody segment is used for grazing, residential property, urban uses and some crop growing. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data were collected in accordance with the 2008 SWAMP QAPP, 2013 amendment. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water). | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 343334 | ||||
Pollutant: | Sulfates | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 1 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Sulfate |
||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Sulfate in this water body is 7.2 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: South Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal (603BSP004) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-28 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
DECISION ID |
163814 |
Region 6 |
Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) |
||
Pollutant: | Total Dissolved Solids |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 96233 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Dissolved Solids | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total Dissolved | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 6 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | A total of 22 discrete samples over three years were collected by Lahontan SWAMP staff at two monitoring locations on this waterbody segment. TDS concentrations ranged from 41 to 60.5 mg/L. The annual averages for each site, calculated for 2013, 2014 and 2015, exceeded the water quality objective in one instance during 2015. | ||||
Data Reference: | Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The site-specific objective for total dissolved solids (TDS) in Bishop Creek as referenced in the Lahontan Basin Plan table 3-17, states that the annual average shall not exceed 59 mg/L. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | Data were collected from two monitoring locations and the south and north channels of Bishop Creek, 603BSP004 & 603BSP021 respectively. These monitoring locations are found at the downstream end of each respective channel, before the waterbody empties into Bishop Canal. | ||||
Temporal Representation: | Data were collected over a three year period, from May 2013 through December 2015 with approximately once per quarter frequency. | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | Bishop Creek Forks spans from the bifurcation of the north and south channels upstream of the area known locally as West Bishop, to the respective terminus of each channel when they empty into Bishop Canal downstream of the City of Bishop. This waterbody consists of two discrete channels, but have been grouped together for assessment purposes based on their proximity to one another, their highly similar geology and similar land use impacts. The landscape surrounding the waterbody segment is used for grazing, residential property, urban uses and some crop growing. | ||||
QAPP Information: | Data were collected in accordance with the 2008 SWAMP QAPP, 2013 amendment. | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water). | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 343378 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Dissolved Solids | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Total Dissolved Solids |
||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Total Dissolved Solids in this water body is 59 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: North Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal (603BSP021) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 343370 | ||||
Pollutant: | Total Dissolved Solids | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 2 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Total Dissolved Solids |
||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Basin Plan objective for Total Dissolved Solids in this water body is 59 (mg/L), (as a Mean). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: South Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal (603BSP004) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
DECISION ID |
162667 |
Region 6 |
Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) |
||
Pollutant: | Turbidity |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Three lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 38 samples exceed the guideline for turbidity. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of 38 samples exceeded the guideline and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 340825 | ||||
Pollutant: | Turbidity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 8 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 8 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Water designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) based upon drinking water standards specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. The Lahontan Basin Plan also has regionwide turbidity objective for other beneficial uses that states: Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect the water for beneficial uses. Increases in turbidity shall not exceed natural levels by more than 10%. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient surface waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's 'Chemical Constituents' objective. The Secondary MCL for turbidity is 5 NTU. Calculation of a numeric objective for other beneficial uses requires comparison with upstream or other background data which may not be available as part of the data used for water quality assessment. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15. Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 603BSP004 (South Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 340976 | ||||
Pollutant: | Turbidity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 8 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Water designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) based upon drinking water standards specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. The Lahontan Basin Plan also has regionwide turbidity objective for other beneficial uses that states: Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect the water for beneficial uses. Increases in turbidity shall not exceed natural levels by more than 10%. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient surface waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's 'Chemical Constituents' objective. The Secondary MCL for turbidity is 5 NTU. Calculation of a numeric objective for other beneficial uses requires comparison with upstream or other background data which may not be available as part of the data used for water quality assessment. | ||||
Guideline Reference: | California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15. Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 603BSP021 (North Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 98481 | ||||
Pollutant: | Turbidity | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | Total | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 22 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 22 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Turbidity. | ||||
Data Reference: | Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Water designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) based upon drinking water standards specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. The Lahontan Basin Plan also has regionwide turbidity objective for other beneficial uses that states: Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect the water for beneficial uses. Increases in turbidity shall not exceed natural levels by more than 10%. | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient surface waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's \Chemical Constituents\" objective. The Secondary MCL for turbidity is 5 NTU. Calculation of a numeric objective for other beneficial uses requires comparison with upstream or other background data which may not be available as part of the data used for water quality assessment. " | ||||
Guideline Reference: | California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15. Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring | ||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 2 monitoring site(s) (603BSP004, 603BSP021) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-22 and 2015-12-01 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program | ||||
DECISION ID |
162665 |
Region 6 |
Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) |
||
Pollutant: | pH |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 129662 | ||||
Pollutant: | pH | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | 0 of 0 samples exceeded the water quality standard for pH. Although pH data does exist for this waterbody, the objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality standards could not be made. | ||||
Data Reference: | Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: \In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.\"" | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 2 monitoring site(s) (603BSP004, 603BSP021) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-22 and 2015-12-01 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 339517 | ||||
Pollutant: | pH | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. The objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality thresholds could not be made. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: 'In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.' | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 603BSP021 (North Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 129607 | ||||
Pollutant: | pH | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | 0 of 0 samples exceeded the water quality standard for pH. Although pH data does exist for this waterbody, the objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality standards could not be made. | ||||
Data Reference: | Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: \In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.\"" | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 2 monitoring site(s) (603BSP004, 603BSP021) | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-22 and 2015-12-01 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 339563 | ||||
Pollutant: | pH | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Cold Freshwater Habitat | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. The objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality thresholds could not be made. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: 'In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.' | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 603BSP004 (South Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 339627 | ||||
Pollutant: | pH | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. The objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality thresholds could not be made. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: 'In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.' | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 603BSP021 (North Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 339522 | ||||
Pollutant: | pH | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Municipal & Domestic Supply | ||||
Number of Samples: | 0 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 8 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. The objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality thresholds could not be made. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: 'In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.' | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 603BSP004 (South Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-10 and 2017-11-28 | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
DECISION ID |
169044 |
Region 6 |
Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) |
||
Pollutant: | Indicator Bacteria |
Final Listing Decision: | Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (associated with a USEPA accepted Advanced Restoration Plan) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018) |
Revision Status | Revised |
Sources: | A Source Unknown |
TMDL Name: | Bishop Creek Bacteria Advance Restoration Plan (Vision Plan) |
TMDL Project Code: | 1422 |
TMDL Priority: | Low |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
Regional Board Conclusion: | This pollutant is being considered for removal from the CWA section 303(d) List under section 4.2 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. 54 lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 827 of the 7,399 samples exceed the objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. However, • Section 6.1.5.3 Temporal Representation indicates that samples should be representative of the critical timing that the pollutant is expected to impact the water body. It also states that, in general, samples should be available from two or more seasons or from two or more events when effects or water quality objective exceedances would be expected to be clearly manifested. The data indicates that the pollutant impacts the beneficial use during the period of time that corresponds with irrigation season (late Spring to early Fall), and overlaps the period of time that the risk of human exposure is greatest (summer). That the datasets assessed also include a data from a concentration of sampling efforts undertaken outside of this time period lessens the ability to observe a response signal from management practices described in the Bishop Creek Vision Plan advance restoration plan. • Section 6.1.5.2 Spatial Representation indicates that, to the extent possible, samples should represent statistically or in a consistent targeted manner the segment of the water body. The distribution of the sampling points in the dataset does not appear to be distributed in a consistent targeted manner throughout the water body. This uneven spatial distribution is arguably not representative of the bacteria water quality in this waterbody. 3. 827 of 73998 samples exceeded the objective and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.2 of the Listing Policy. However, during critical time periods, the exceedance frequency still indicates regular nonattainment of the water quality objectives. Moreover, when the water quality is exceeded in spring and several other times through early fall, the magnitude of the exceedance reaches the upper limits of the analysis methodology, indicating a correspondingly higher risk to public health during those time periods, and impairment of the REC-1 beneficial use. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met. |
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded. |
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
State Board Decision Recommendation: | |
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336642 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | GeoMean | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 95 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 95 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters other than Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 3 (Bishop Creek Station 3). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-06-28 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336669 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | GeoMean | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 318 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 40 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 40 of the 318 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters other than Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 12 (Bishop Creek Station 12). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336727 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | GeoMean | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 145 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 19 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 19 of the 145 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters other than Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 17 (Bishop Creek Station 17). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2017-06-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336699 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 87 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 8 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 8 of the 87 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 7 (Bishop Creek Station 7). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336700 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 65 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 14 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 14 of the 65 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 26 (Bishop Creek Station 26). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2016-03-25 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336707 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 87 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 15 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 15 of the 87 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 14 (Bishop Creek Station 14). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336654 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | GeoMean | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 42 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 42 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters other than Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 19 Alt (Bishop Creek Station 19 Alt). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2016-07-06 and 2019-10-23 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336660 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | GeoMean | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 183 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 69 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 69 of the 183 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters other than Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 24 (Bishop Creek Station 24). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2015-06-03 and 2022-09-21 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336694 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 55 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 15 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 15 of the 55 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 24 (Bishop Creek Station 24). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2015-06-03 and 2022-09-21 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336709 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 85 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 85 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 1 (Bishop Creek Station 1). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336716 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 66 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 66 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 2 (Bishop Creek Station 2). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-06-28 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336722 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 87 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 14 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 14 of the 87 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 16 (Bishop Creek Station 16). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336725 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 87 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 6 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 6 of the 87 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 11 (Bishop Creek Station 11). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336646 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | GeoMean | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 318 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 27 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 27 of the 318 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters other than Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 14 (Bishop Creek Station 14). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336732 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 61 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 61 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 3 (Bishop Creek Station 3). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-06-28 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336724 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 87 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 3 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 3 of the 87 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 4 (Bishop Creek Station 4). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336705 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | GeoMean | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 217 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 84 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 84 of the 217 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters other than Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 26 (Bishop Creek Station 26). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2016-03-25 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336691 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | GeoMean | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 298 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 11 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 11 of the 298 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters other than Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 15 (Bishop Creek Station 15). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336677 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | GeoMean | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 281 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 11 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 11 of the 281 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters other than Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 7 (Bishop Creek Station 7). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336689 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | GeoMean | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 307 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 29 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 29 of the 307 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters other than Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 16 (Bishop Creek Station 16). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336665 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | GeoMean | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 220 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 20 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 20 of the 220 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters other than Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 27 (Bishop Creek Station 27). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2016-05-25 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336641 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | GeoMean | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 305 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 34 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 34 of the 305 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters other than Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 9 (Bishop Creek Station 9). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336733 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 44 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 44 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 19 (Bishop Creek Station 19). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2018-08-30 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336731 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 28 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 28 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 19 Alt (Bishop Creek Station 19 Alt). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2016-07-06 and 2019-10-23 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336720 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 72 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 26 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 26 of the 72 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 25 (Bishop Creek Station 25). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2015-06-03 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336714 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 37 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 9 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 9 of the 37 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 17 (Bishop Creek Station 17). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2017-06-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336695 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 87 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 87 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 5 (Bishop Creek Station 5). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336692 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 64 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 6 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 6 of the 64 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 27 (Bishop Creek Station 27). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2016-05-25 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336697 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | GeoMean | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 52 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 52 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters other than Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 19 (Bishop Creek Station 19). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2018-08-30 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336645 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | GeoMean | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 85 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 85 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters other than Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 2 (Bishop Creek Station 2). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-06-28 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 99993 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 188 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 15 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed RWB6_BACT_Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 15 of the 188 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality standard for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for Regional Water Board 6 Bacteria Monitoring. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective applicable to all waters, except Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is less than 10 parts per thousand (ppth) 95 percent or more of the time is a STATISTICAL THRESHOLD VALUE (STV) of 320 cfu/100 mL not to be exceeded more than 10 percent of the time (calculated monthly). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 11 monitoring site(s), station(s): 603BSP004, 603BSP011, 603BSPB20, 603BSPB22, 603BSPB50, 603BSPB55, 603BSPB60, 603BSPB65, BIS.40, BIS.55, BIS.60 | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2012-10-18 and 2015-10-13 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 99720 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 26 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 4 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed RWB6_BACT_Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 4 of the 26 samples exceeded the geomean water quality standard for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for Regional Water Board 6 Bacteria Monitoring. | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective applicable to all waters, except Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is less than 10 parts per thousand (ppth) 95 percent or more of the time is a six-week rolling GEOMETRIC MEAN (GM) of Escherichia coli (E. coli) not to exceed 100 colony forming units per 100 milliliters (cfu/100 mL) (calculated weekly). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 11 monitoring site(s), station(s): 603BSP004, 603BSP011, 603BSPB20, 603BSPB22, 603BSPB50, 603BSPB55, 603BSPB60, 603BSPB65, BIS.40, BIS.55, BIS.60 | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2012-10-18 and 2015-10-13 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 99837 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 99 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 51 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 51 of the 99 samples exceeded the geomean water quality standard for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective applicable to all waters, except Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is less than 10 parts per thousand (ppth) 95 percent or more of the time is a six-week rolling GEOMETRIC MEAN (GM) of Escherichia coli (E. coli) not to exceed 100 colony forming units per 100 milliliters (cfu/100 mL) (calculated weekly). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 6 monitoring site(s), station(s): 603BSP004, 603BSP005, 603BSP006, 603BSP008, 603BSP010, 603BSP021 | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2012-05-30 and 2015-12-01 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 100056 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | None | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 81 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 12 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 12 of the 81 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality standard for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | Water Quality Assessment Data for the 2018 solicitation cycle submitted through CEDEN for the SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring (tissue and water). | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective applicable to all waters, except Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is less than 10 parts per thousand (ppth) 95 percent or more of the time is a STATISTICAL THRESHOLD VALUE (STV) of 320 cfu/100 mL not to be exceeded more than 10 percent of the time (calculated monthly). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 6 monitoring site(s), station(s): 603BSP004, 603BSP005, 603BSP006, 603BSP008, 603BSP010, 603BSP021 | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2012-05-30 and 2015-12-01 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Quality Assurance Program Plan and Standard Operating Procedures for SWAMP program | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336662 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | GeoMean | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 186 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 186 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters other than Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 1 (Bishop Creek Station 1). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336663 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | GeoMean | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 256 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 126 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 126 of the 256 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters other than Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 25 (Bishop Creek Station 25). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2015-06-03 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336680 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | GeoMean | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 205 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 205 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters other than Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 18 (Bishop Creek Station 18). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336676 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | GeoMean | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 200 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 5 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 5 of the 200 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters other than Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 6 (Bishop Creek Station 6). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2020-03-11 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336679 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 87 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 11 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 11 of the 87 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 10 (Bishop Creek Station 10). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336687 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 86 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 86 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 18 (Bishop Creek Station 18). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336869 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 6 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 6 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 603BSP021 (North Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2016-03-10 and 2017-06-14 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336640 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | GeoMean | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 306 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 21 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 21 of the 306 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters other than Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 11 (Bishop Creek Station 11). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336681 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 87 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 12 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 12 of the 87 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 15 (Bishop Creek Station 15). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336866 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 6 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 1 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB6 Monitoring data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 6 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | Benthic, Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ from the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 603BSP004 (South Fork Bishop Cr above Bishop Cr Canal). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2016-03-10 and 2017-06-14 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | Generic SWAMP QAPrP | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336713 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 87 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 8 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 8 of the 87 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 8 (Bishop Creek Station 8). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336718 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 37 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 7 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 7 of the 37 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 13 (Bishop Creek Station 13). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2017-06-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336650 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | GeoMean | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 314 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 30 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 30 of the 314 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters other than Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 10 (Bishop Creek Station 10). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336657 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | GeoMean | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 248 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 248 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters other than Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 4 (Bishop Creek Station 4). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336673 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | GeoMean | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 269 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 0 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 269 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters other than Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 5 (Bishop Creek Station 5). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336684 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | GeoMean | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 122 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 14 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 14 of the 122 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters other than Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 13 (Bishop Creek Station 13). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2017-06-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336639 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | GeoMean | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 299 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 20 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 20 of the 299 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters other than Lake Tahoe, where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 8 (Bishop Creek Station 8). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336674 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 87 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 10 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 10 of the 87 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 9 (Bishop Creek Station 9). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336682 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 65 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 4 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 4 of the 65 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 6 (Bishop Creek Station 6). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2020-03-11 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||
|
|||||
LOE ID: | 336702 | ||||
Pollutant: | Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ||||
LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
Matrix: | Water | ||||
Fraction: | STV | ||||
Beneficial Use: | Water Contact Recreation | ||||
Number of Samples: | 87 | ||||
Number of Exceedances: | 14 | ||||
Data and Information Type: | PATHOGEN MONITORING | ||||
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Water Board staff assessed Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study data for Bishop Creek Forks (North and South Forks below bifurcation) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 14 of the 87 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. | ||||
Data Reference: | WQ from the MBC Fecal indicator study in the Eastern Sierra for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 | ||||
SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). | ||||
Objective/Criterion Reference: | Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy | ||||
Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
Guideline Reference: | |||||
Spatial Representation: | The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): BC 12 (Bishop Creek Station 12). | ||||
Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected between the days of 2014-06-04 and 2022-09-27 . | ||||
Environmental Conditions: | |||||
QAPP Information: | MBC FIB Bacteria QAPP | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - FIB Bacteria QAPP - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402598 | ||||
QAPP Information Reference(s): | MBC Aquatic Sciences - QAPP FIB Study V3. - Eastern Sierra Fecal Indicator Bacteria Study - 402641 | ||||