Pollutant: |
Chloride |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
|
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 162832, Chloride
|
Region 6 |
Lower Sunset Lake (Alpine County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
348037 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chloride |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed EPA National Aquatic Resources Survey (NARS) data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride |
Data Reference: |
WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Basin Plan objective for Chloride in this water body is 4 (mg/L), (as a Mean). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Lower Sunset Lake (NARS_WQX-NLA_CA-10171) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-09-25 and 2017-09-25 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Generic SWAMP QAPrP |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorophyll-a |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
|
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 162833, Chlorophyll-a
|
Region 6 |
Lower Sunset Lake (Alpine County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
341221 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorophyll-a |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed EPA National Aquatic Resources Survey (NARS) data for Lower Sunset Lake (Alpine County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorophyll a. |
Data Reference: |
WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect the water for beneficial uses. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
North Carolina Administrative code (NCAC), Title 15A ? Environmental and Natural Resources, Subchapter 2B-Surface water and wetland standards, Rule 0211-Fresh surface water quality standards for class C waters (Class C is defined as freshwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, aquatic life including propagation and survival, and wildlife).?Section 3(a) of Rule 0211 applies to all fresh surface waters and states that chlorophyll a is not to exceed 40 ug/L. |
Guideline Reference: |
North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: NARS_WQX-NLA_CA-10171 (Lower Sunset Lake). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-09-25 and 2017-09-25 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Generic SWAMP QAPrP |
|
Pollutant: |
Indicator Bacteria |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 170020, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 6 |
Lower Sunset Lake (Alpine County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
336875 |
|
Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
STV |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed EPA National Aquatic Resources Survey (NARS) data for Lower Sunset Lake (Alpine County) to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. |
Data Reference: |
WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use in waters other than Lake Thaoe, where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): NARS_WQX-NLA_CA-10171 (Lower Sunset Lake). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2017-09-25 and 2017-09-25 . |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Generic SWAMP QAPrP |
|
Pollutant: |
Sodium |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
|
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 162835, Sodium
|
Region 6 |
Lower Sunset Lake (Alpine County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
341793 |
|
Pollutant: |
Sodium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Agricultural Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed EPA National Aquatic Resources Survey (NARS) data for Lower Sunset Lake (Alpine County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Sodium. |
Data Reference: |
WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Water Quality for Agriculture, published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations in 1985, contains criteria protective of various agricultural uses of water, including irrigation of various types of crops and stock watering. At or below the sodium threshold of 69 mg/L, agricultural uses of water should not be limited. |
Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality for Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev 1, Rome (1985) |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: NARS_WQX-NLA_CA-10171 (Lower Sunset Lake). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-09-25 and 2017-09-25 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Generic SWAMP QAPrP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 162835, Sodium
|
Region 6 |
Lower Sunset Lake (Alpine County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
341799 |
|
Pollutant: |
Sodium |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed EPA National Aquatic Resources Survey (NARS) data for Lower Sunset Lake (Alpine County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Sodium. |
Data Reference: |
WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Per the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories (USEPA 2012), the health advisory for sodium for individuals on a sodium-restricted diet is 20 mg/l. |
Guideline Reference: |
2012 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: NARS_WQX-NLA_CA-10171 (Lower Sunset Lake). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-09-25 and 2017-09-25 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Generic SWAMP QAPrP |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 170021, Specific Conductivity
|
Region 6 |
Lower Sunset Lake (Alpine County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
341888 |
|
Pollutant: |
Specific Conductivity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed EPA National Aquatic Resources Survey (NARS) data for Lower Sunset Lake (Alpine County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity. |
Data Reference: |
WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) based upon drinking water standards specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations (Water Quality Control Plan, Lahontan Region). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's 'Chemical Constituents' objective. The California Secondary MCL for specific conductivity is 900 uS/cm. |
Guideline Reference: |
California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15. Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: NARS_WQX-NLA_CA-10171 (Lower Sunset Lake). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-09-25 and 2017-09-25 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Generic SWAMP QAPrP |
|
Pollutant: |
Sulfates |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
|
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 162836, Sulfates
|
Region 6 |
Lower Sunset Lake (Alpine County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
348072 |
|
Pollutant: |
Sulfates |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed EPA National Aquatic Resources Survey (NARS) data to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Sulfate |
Data Reference: |
WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Basin Plan objective for Sulfate in this water body is 4 (mg/L), (as a Mean). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Lower Sunset Lake (NARS_WQX-NLA_CA-10171) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-09-25 and 2017-09-25 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Generic SWAMP QAPrP |
|
Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 162837, Turbidity
|
Region 6 |
Lower Sunset Lake (Alpine County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
341968 |
|
Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed EPA National Aquatic Resources Survey (NARS) data for Lower Sunset Lake (Alpine County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
Data Reference: |
WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water designated as MUN shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant level (MCL) or secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) based upon drinking water standards specified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. The Lahontan Basin Plan also has regionwide turbidity objective for other beneficial uses that states: Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect the water for beneficial uses. Increases in turbidity shall not exceed natural levels by more than 10%. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) apply to ambient surface waters under the Lahontan Basin Plan's 'Chemical Constituents' objective. The Secondary MCL for turbidity is 5 NTU. Calculation of a numeric objective for other beneficial uses requires comparison with upstream or other background data which may not be available as part of the data used for water quality assessment. |
Guideline Reference: |
California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15. Domestic Water Quality and Monitoring |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: NARS_WQX-NLA_CA-10171 (Lower Sunset Lake). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-09-25 and 2017-09-25 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Generic SWAMP QAPrP |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
Revision Status |
Revised |
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
|
Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
|
Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
|
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
|
State Board Decision Recommendation: |
|
|
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 162834, pH
|
Region 6 |
Lower Sunset Lake (Alpine County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
341659 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed EPA National Aquatic Resources Survey (NARS) data for Lower Sunset Lake (Alpine County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. The objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality thresholds could not be made. |
Data Reference: |
WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: 'In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.' |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: NARS_WQX-NLA_CA-10171 (Lower Sunset Lake). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-09-25 and 2017-09-25 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Generic SWAMP QAPrP |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 162834, pH
|
Region 6 |
Lower Sunset Lake (Alpine County) |
|
|
LOE ID: |
341690 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed EPA National Aquatic Resources Survey (NARS) data for Lower Sunset Lake (Alpine County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. The objective for this pollutant requires background information that is currently unavailable, and therefore an assessment of water quality thresholds could not be made. |
Data Reference: |
WQX from the NWQMP for the 2026 Integrated Report in Region 6 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Lahontan Basin Plan's regionwide objective for pH states: 'In fresh waters with designated beneficial uses of COLD or WARM, changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not exceed 0.5 pH units. For all other waters of the region, the pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5 units. The Regional Board recognizes that some waters of the Region may have natural pH levels outside of the 6.5 to 8.5 range. Compliance with the pH objective for these waters will be determined on a case-by-case basis.' |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (as amended) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: NARS_WQX-NLA_CA-10171 (Lower Sunset Lake). |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-09-25 and 2017-09-25 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP QAPrP |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Generic SWAMP QAPrP |
|