Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Project No. 2082
Klamath River Hydroelectric Project
(Picture provided by State Water Board staff)
Applicant: PacifiCorp
Counties: Klamath and Siskiyou Counties
License Expiration Date: March 1, 2006
Water Quality Certification Status: Application withdrawn on June 23, 2016
Waterbodies: Klamath River and Fall Creek
FERC Licensing Process: Abeyance as of June 16, 2016
Project Description:
The Klamath Hydroelectric Project (Project) is owned and operated by PacifiCorp and is located primarily along the mainstem Klamath River, in Siskiyou County, California, and in Klamath County, Oregon. The California portion of the Project includes three mainstem dams (Iron Gate, Copco No.1, and Copco No.2), and a small hydroelectric facility on Fall Creek (a tributary to the Klamath River). The Oregon portion of the Project includes two mainstem dams (J.C. Boyle and Keno), and two power generation facilities (East Side and West Side) [Project Map]. The nearest cities are Klamath Falls (located at the northern end of the Project area) and Yreka (located approximately 20 miles southwest of the Project’s downstream end).
On February 23, 2004, PacifiCorp filed an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) proposing to: 1) remove Keno from the Project; 2) decommission East Side and West Side powerhouses; and 3) relicense the five remaining facilities for continued operations in a manner similar to past operations with the addition of environmental measures.
On June 16, 2016, at the request of PacifiCorp, FERC issued an order placing PacifiCorp’s relicensing of the Project in abeyance. On June 23, 2016, following FERC’s abeyance order, PacifiCorp formally withdrew its Clean Water Act section 401 water quality certification applications from the states of Oregon and California to allow time for PacifiCorp to transfer ownership of the Project to the Klamath River Renewal Corporation (KRRC). If the FERC abeyance terminates, PacifiCorp will be required to resubmit water quality certification applications to the State Water Resources Control Board and Oregon Department of Environmental Quality for the Project.
On September 23, 2016, PacifiCorp and KRRC filed with FERC a joint license transfer application seeking to transfer J.C. Boyle; Copco No. 1; Copco No. 2; and Iron Gate facilities to the KRRC. Concurrent with PacifiCorp’s license transfer application, the KRRC filed a license surrender application, for the newly named Lower Klamath Project (FERC No. 14803). Additional information on the Project and the Lower Klamath Project, beyond the scope of the State Water Board’s water quality certification process, can be found on FERC’s elibrary.
The Lower Klamath Project also has an active water quality certification application with California and Oregon. Information on the Lower Klamath Project’s California water quality certification application process can be found on the State Water Board’s Lower Klamath Project webpage.
Water Quality Issues associated with California Portions of the Klamath River
Blue-green algal blooms occur yearly in the Klamath River and in Iron Gate and Copco reservoirs. One species, Microcystis aeruginosa (microcystis), produces microcystin a liver toxin and has led to annual issuance of California health advisories during the late summer and early fall (heath advisory poster). The anadromous fish populations in the Klamath River watershed have declined significantly in recent years, which may be related to various factors including fish passage blockage, parasitic fish diseases in the watershed, and poor water quality. The Klamath River and Project facilities are listed in the California’s 2012 CWA Section 303(d) List of Impaired Water Bodies (2012 Integrated Report) as follows:
- The Klamath River from the Oregon border to the Pacific Ocean is listed for nutrients, organic enrichment/low dissolved oxygen, and temperature.
- Iron Gate and Copco No. 1 reservoirs are listed for mercury and for a liver toxin produced by blue-green algae, called microcystin.
- The Klamath River from Copco No. 1 reservoir to the Trinity River is listed for microcystin.
- The Klamath from the Trinity River to the Pacific Ocean is listed for sediment.
- The Klamath River from Iron Gate Dam to the Scott River is listed for aluminum.
Klamath Settlement Agreements
On February 18, 2010, PacifiCorp, several state, federal, and local agencies, non-governmental organizations, individual stakeholders and Native American tribes executed the Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement (KHSA). The State Water Board is not a signatory to, and is not bound by, the KHSA. The KHSA seeks to return the Klamath River to free-flowing conditions and provide volitional fish passage in the portion of the Klamath River currently occupied by the Project’s dams and associated facilities. The originally executed KHSA proposed federal legislation that would have halted PacifiCorp’s Klamath Hydroelectric Project FERC relicensing process and granted the Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior the authority to determine whether removing J.C. Boyle, Copco No. 1, Copco No. 2, and Iron Gate facilities was in the public interest and would advance salmon restoration. In 2016, the KHSA was amended to remove the need for congressional authorization, and to pursue dam removal through the FERC license surrender process.
Four other settlement agreements were executed by a number of parties with varying interests in the Klamath Basin: 1) Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement; 2) Klamath Power and Facilities Agreement; and 3) Upper Klamath Basin Comprehensive Agreement; and 4) Klamath Power and Facilities Agreement. The KHSA and these settlement agreements, among other things: 1) provided a decision-making framework and process for removal of J.C. Boyle, Copco No. 1, Copco No. 2, and Iron Gate facilities; 2 addressed water supply and allocation issues; and 3) set forth substantial water quality improvement measures for the Upper Klamath Basin.
Related Documents
2015 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA):
- Yurok Tribe's Request for Consultation Regarding Water Quality Certification for the Klamath Hydroelectric Project – January 29, 2016
- State Water Board's Response to Yurok Tribe's Consultation Request – February 23, 2016
- Notice of Preparation Public Scoping Comments
- Notice of Preparation and Scoping Meetings – November 30, 2015 (Updated - December 23, 2015)
- NOP Scoping Meeting Information
- Scoping Meeting Transcripts
- Yreka – January 26, 2016
- Orleans – January 26, 2016
- Arcata – January 25, 2016
- Sacramento – January 14, 2016
- January 14, 2016 Meeting Webcast
- Presentation
- Scoping Meeting Information Sheet (Handout)
- Scoping Meeting Transcripts
- NOP Scoping Meeting Information
- Fact Sheet: Klamath Hydroelectric Project – November 30, 2015
Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement:
Amended Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement – November 30, 2016
Amended Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement – April 6, 2016
2016 Agreement in Principal – February 2, 2016
Klamath Facilities Removal Draft EIS/EIR:
- Additional Comments on Klamath Facilities Removal Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/Environmental Impact Report (EIR) – January 13, 2012
- State Water Board Comments on Klamath Facilities Removal Draft EIS/EIR – November 28, 2011
- Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement – February 18, 2010
- Klamath Settlement Parties as of March 17, 2010
- Summary of Klamath Basin Settlement Agreements
- Letter from Kirk Miller to Dorothy Rice
Requests for Abeyance & Restart of Water Quality Certification Process, Associated Correspondence & Resolutions:
- Hoopa Valley Tribal Council Letter to State Water Board regarding Comments on 401 Water Quality Certification Application – July 10, 2013
- State Water Board Response to Hoopa Valley Tribal Council Letter – August 22, 2013
- PacifiCorp Energy's letter to State Water Board regarding Schedule and Work Plan for Updating KHP Water Quality Certification Application with 2013 KHSA Annual Implementation Report
- Fourth Klamath Abeyance Resolution (Resolution No. 2012-0039) – July 17, 2012
- Congress of the United States on Behalf of the Congressional co-sponsors of H.R. 3398, Requests Continuance of Abeyance – July 12, 2012
- Siskiyou Land Conservancy's Request to Lift the Abeyance and Deny PacifiCorp's Request for Relicensing – July 10, 2012
- County of Humboldt Support of Resolution to Continue Abeyance – July 3, 2012
- Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations Support of Continuance of Abeyance – June 29, 2012
- The Klamath Tribes Request for Resolution Granting Extension of Abeyance – June 27, 2012
- PacifiCorp Energy's Request for SWRCB to Continue Abeyance – July 2, 2012
- Mid-Klamath Watershed Council Support of a Resolution to Continue Abeyance – July 2, 2012
- California Natural Resources Agency Request on Behalf of the KHSA Parties for Meeting to Advocate for Continued Abeyance – May 7, 2012
- Salmon River Restoration Council Support to Continue Abeyance – June 11, 2012
- Karuk Tribe Request on Behalf of KHSA Parties for Meeting to Advocate for Continued Abeyance – May 14, 2012
- Sierra Club Requests Board Exercise its Regulatory Authority – May 1, 2012
- Hoopa Valley Tribe’s Request to Move Forward on the Application for the Klamath Hydroelectric Project – April 5, 2012
- Letter from Hoopa Valley Tribal Council Land Management Division & Attachment – March 3, 2012
- Third Klamath Abeyance Resolution (Resolution No. 2011-0038) – August 16, 2011
- Request to Amend Klamath Abeyance Resolution
- Request for reinstatement for Klamath Abeyance Resolution – September 16, 2010
- Comment Letters on Resolution
- Second Klamath Abeyance Resolution (Resolution No. 2010-0049) – October 5, 2010
- Original Klamath Abeyance Resolution (Resolution No. 2010-0024) – May 18, 2010
- Comment Letters on Resolution
- Request for Abeyance of Water Quality Certification and CEQA process
Klamath Agreement-in-Principal Status Report:
- Progress Report and Update on Interim Measures – June 16, 2009
- 2009 Water Quality Management Actions – April 30, 2009
- February 17, 2009 Board Meeting
2008 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA):
- February 17, 2009 Board Meeting
- Notice of Preparation, September 30, 2008
- Notice of Correction – October 21, 2008 Meeting in Yreka, dated October 3, 2008
- Notice of Extended Scoping Comment Deadline, dated November 17, 2008
- Update of Scoping Comment Deadline, dated February 21, 2009
- Pre-NOP Correspondence
- Friends of the River, June 12, 2008
- Karuk Tribe of California, June 15, 2008
- Klamath Riverkeeper and California Coastkeeper Alliance, June 16, 2008
- Hoopa Valley Tribal Council, June 19, 2008
- State of California Resources Agency, June 24, 2008
- State Water Board Response to Resources, June 26, 2008
- City of Morro Bay, July 7, 2008
- State Water Board Letter to PacifiCorp, August 22, 2008
- PacifiCorp Response to State Water Board, September 10, 2008
- State Water Board Response to Pacific Corp, September 22, 2008
Klamath Hydroelectric Project 401 Water Quality Certification Applications:
- Withdrawal, June 23, 2016
- Withdrawal and Resubmittal, November 10, 2015
- Withdrawal and Resubmittal, November 24, 2014
- Updated 401 Water Quality Certification Application, August 15, 2014
- Withdrawal and Resubmittal, December 2, 2013
- Withdrawal and Resubmittal, December 18, 2012
- Withdrawal and Resubmittal, July 17, 2012
- Withdrawal and Resubmittal, August 3, 2011
- Withdrawal and Resubmittal, August 25, 2010
- Withdrawal and Resubmittal, September 10, 2009
- Previous Request for Withdrawal, July 14, 2008
- Resubmitted, September 26, 2008
2008 Water Quality Study Plan:
Proposed 2008 Study Plans
- 2008 Klamath Water Quality Study Plan, April 22, 2008
- 2008 Klamath Water Quality Sampling Plan, June 30, 2008
2008 Study Plan Correspondence
- State Water Board Comments on 2008 Study Plan, June 20, 2008
- State Water Board Information Request
- PacifiCorp Response to Comments
- PacifiCorp Response to Information Request
- State Water Board Response to PacifiCorp
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA):
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Klamath Hydroelectric Project, FERC Project No. 2082
North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board:
- Water Quality Control Plan for the North Coast Region (Basin Plan) – May 2011
- Clean Water Act Section 303(d) List of Water Quality Limited Segments – January 3, 2012
- Action Plan for the Klamath River Total Maximum Daily Loads – September 2010
- Klamath River Site-Specific Objectives for Dissolved Oxygen – September 2010
Klamath River Studies:
- Final Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Cyanotoxin Accumulation in Fish and Freshwater Mussels of the Klamath River
- Nutrient Budgets And Phytoplankton Trends In Iron Gate and Copco Reservoirs, California, May 2005 – May 2006
- Final Report
- Appendix E1 – Stratification Table
- Appendix E2 – Field and Lab Measurements
- Appendix E3 – Hydro Budgets
- Appendix E4 – Nutrient Budgets
- Appendix E5 – Phytoplankton Data