The California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year 2016-17
State Board | Region 1 | Region 2 | Region 3 | Region 4 | Region 5 | Region 6 | Region 7 | Region 8 | Region 9
TARGETS AND RESOURCES: REGION 2 SAN FRANCISCO BAY |
GROUP: TARGETS AND RESOURCES - REGION 2 |
MEASURE: ALL REGIONAL TARGETS ALL RESOURCES |
Targets Achieved: |
San Francisco Bay Regional Water Board Performance Summary1 | Percentage of Targets Met |
||
Area: 4520 square miles | Budget: $25,697,771 | Staff: 101.7 | |
Permitting 100% • | Inspections 67% • | Others 67% • | |
1Regional Board performance summary statistics show the percentage of targets met. |
Total Maximum Daily Load and Basin Planning | |||||
Program Budget: $2,381,594 | Program Staff: 10.60 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
Pollutant/Water Body Combinations Addressed | 2 | 0 | 0% • | ||
Total Maximum Daily Loads Adopted | 1 | 0 | 0% • | ||
Basin Plan Amendments Adopted | 0 | 0 | |||
No Regional Board Considerations provided | |||||
NPDES Wastewater | |||||
Program Budget: $2,667,645 | Program Staff: 11.30 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
Major Individual Permits Issued or Renewed | 11 | 10 | 91% • | ||
Major Individual Facilities Inspected | 27 | 27 | 100% • | ||
Minor Individual Permits Issued or Renewed | 3 | 4 | 133% • | ||
Minor Individual Facilities Inspected | 0 | 5 | |||
Minor General Facilities Inspected | 0 | 0 | |||
No Regional Board Considerations provided | |||||
NPDES Stormwater | |||||
Program Budget: $2,188,793 | Program Staff: 10.60 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
Municipal (Phase I/II Inspections) | 57 | 21 | 37% • | ||
Construction Inspections | 74 | 87 | 118% • | ||
Industrial Inspections | 69 | 106 | 154% • | ||
Factors affecting available staff time for NPDES municipal stormwater work included requirements for information submittal from the Commission on State Mandates, which consumed more than 4 months of staff time, reducing the time available for other activities. | |||||
Waste Discharge to Land - Wastewater | |||||
Program Budget: $784,257 | Program Staff: 2.60 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
Waste Discharge to Land Inspections | 12 | 11 | 92% • | ||
Individual Waste Discharge Requirements Updated | 2 | 4 | 200% • | ||
No Regional Board Considerations Provided | |||||
Land Disposal | |||||
Program Budget: $905,610 | Program Staff: 3.20 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
Landfill Individual Permits Updated | 3 | 3 | 100% • | ||
Landfill Inspections | 40 | 39 | 98% • | ||
All Other Individual Permits Updated | 1 | 1 | 100% • | ||
All Other Inspections | 17 | 6 | 35% • | ||
No Regional Board Considerations Provided | |||||
Confined Animal Facilities (WDR, NPDES, etc.) | |||||
Program Budget: $0 | Program Staff: 0.00 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
Confined Animal Facilities Inspections | 5 | 1 | 20% • | ||
No Regional Board Considerations Provided | |||||
Timber Harvest (Forestry) | |||||
Program Budget: $0 | Program Staff: 0.00 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
Timber Harvest Inspections | 0 | 0 | |||
No Regional Board Considerations Provided | |||||
Enforcement | |||||
Program Budget: $368,441 | Program Staff: 1.90 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
Class 1 Priority Violations will Result in Formal Enforcement or an Investigative Order Pursuant to Water Code Section 13267 within 18 Months of Discovery | 100% | 100% | 100% • | ||
Facilities with Over $12,000 in MMPs (4 or More Violations) Not Assessed within 18 Months of Accrual | 0 | 0 | • | ||
No Regional Board Considerations Provided | |||||
Cleanup | |||||
Program Budget: $7,086,496 | Program Staff: 30.20 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
New Department of Defense Sites Into Active Remediation | 10 | 5 | 50% • | ||
New Cleanup Sites Moved Into Active Remediation | 20 | 28 | 140% • | ||
Cleanup Sites Closed | 35 | 39 | 111% • | ||
New Underground Storage Tank Sites Into Active Remediation | 10 | 8 | 80% • | ||
Underground Storage Tank Sites Projected Closed | 35 | 37 | 106% • | ||
No Regional Board Considerations Provided | |||||