Welcome to the State Water Resources Control Board Welcome to the California Environmental Protection Agency
Governor's Website Visit the Water Board Members Page
Agendas
My Water Quality
Performance Report
PERFORMANCE REPORT The Water Boards...

State Water Board Logo

The California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year 2013-14

State Board | Region 1 | Region 2 | Region 3 | Region 4 | Region 5 | Region 6 | Region 7 | Region 8 | Region 9

TARGETS AND RESOURCES: REGION 2 SAN FRANCISCO BAY


GROUP:  TARGETS AND RESOURCES - REGION 2 MEASURE: ALL REGIONAL TARGETS
ALL RESOURCES

Targets Achieved:
= Less than 60% of target met
= Target met between 60% and 80%
= Target met at 80% or above

 

San Francisco Bay Regional Water Board Performance Summary
Percentage of Targets Met
Area: 4520 square miles Budget: $14,150,520 Staff: 97.8
Permitting 60% Inspections 63% Others 78%
 
 
Total Maximum Daily Load and Basin Planning
Program Budget: $1,586,908 Program Staff: 10.20
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Pollutant/Water Body Combinations Addressed 1 1 100%
Total Maximum Daily Loads Adopted 1 1 100%
Basin Plan Amendments Adopted 0 2 N/A
Waiting for Regional Considerations (Due September 1st)
NPDES Wastewater
Program Budget: $1,497,635 Program Staff: 11.20
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Major Individual Permits Issued or Renewed 7 7 100%
Major Individual Facilities Inspected 24 24 100%
Minor Individual Permits Issued or Renewed 4 4 100%
Minor Individual Facilities Inspected 7 11 157%
Minor General Facilities Inspected 0 0 N/A
No Regional Board Considerations
NPDES Stormwater
Program Budget: $1,309,923 Program Staff: 10.30
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Municipal (Phase I/II Inspections) 26 34 131%
Construction Inspections 84 86 102%
Industrial Inspections 80 50 63%
No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Waste Discharge to Land - Wastewater
Program Budget: $336,007 Program Staff: 2.50
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Waste Discharge to Land Inspections 10 7 70%
Individual Waste Discharge Requirements Updated 2 1 50%
No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Land Disposal
Program Budget: $474,576 Program Staff: 3.20
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Landfill Individual Permits Updated 2 1 50%
Landfill Inspections 35 38 109%
All Other Individual Permits Updated 2 2 100%
All Other Inspections 5 3 60%
No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Confined Animal Facilities (WDR, NPDES, etc.) N/A
Program Budget: $0 Program Staff: 0.00
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Confined Animal Facilities Inspections 0 1 N/A
No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Timber Harvest (Forestry) N/A
Program Budget: $0 Program Staff: 0.00
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Timber Harvest Inspections 0 0 N/A
No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Enforcement
Program Budget: $237,250 Program Staff: 1.90
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Class 1 Priority Violations will Result in Formal Enforcement or an Investigative Order Pursuant to Water Code Section 13267 within 18 Months of Discovery 100% 58% 58%
Facilities with Over $12,000 in MMPs (4 or More Violations) Not Assessed within 18 Months of Accrual 0 1 0%
The target for “Facilities with 4 or more MMP violations Not Assessed within 18 Months of Accrual” is 0, actual achieved column shows number not addressed within 18 months. Number of facilities with 4 or more MMP violations that were addressed within 18 is not shown.
Cleanup
Program Budget: $3,441,433 Program Staff: 24.00
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
New Department of Defense Sites Into Active Remediation 10 16 160%
New Cleanup Sites Moved Into Active Remediation 17 31 182%
Cleanup Sites Closed 25 31 124%
New Underground Storage Tank Sites Into Active Remediation 10 18 180%
Underground Storage Tank Sites Projected Closed 42 63 150%
No Regional Board Considerations Provided

 

 

RESOURCES (INPUTS)

 

 

 

WHAT THE CARD IS SHOWING

Each target card provides a direct comparison of actual outputs for the fiscal year (July 1st to June 30th) to the target estimates established at the outset of the fiscal year. While budgetary and personnel information is not directly aligned with the activities being assessed, it does provide a basis for understanding the relative priority of key programs within each region and across the State. For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases. This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. Notably, the data portrayed include entries completed before November 4, 2014 and may not reflect data input after that period.

WHY THIS CARD IS IMPORTANT

Beginning with FY 2009-10, performance targets were established for certain output measures. Targets are goals that establish measurable levels of performance to be achieved within a specified time period. This card demonstrates how the resources of the region are being deployed to protect water quality. In establishing the targets, the Regional Water Boards considered the unique differences and needs within their respective watersheds, their work priorities given available resources, external factors such as furloughs, and prior year outputs.

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

  • Target circles: = Less than 60% of target met
    = Target met between 60% and 80%
    = Target met at 80% or above.
  • Other Programs (budget): miscellaneous programs not included in the above.
  • Permits issued: Does not include rescissions, amendments or permit revisions that may have been included in the targets.
  • Target Definitions

REGIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

Regional Considerations provided in tables above under each program section.

( Page last updated:  10/27/14 )

 
 

.
Region 2 (San Francisco Bay) FY 13-14
Budget ($)
Staff (PY) %Fees/Taxes
Penalties
%Federal %General
Fund/Other
%Bonds