The California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year 2013-14
GROUP:
TARGETS AND RESOURCES - SBOARD
|
MEASURE: ALL REGIONAL TARGETS ALL RESOURCES
|
Targets Achieved:
• = Less than 60% of target met
• = Target met between 60% and 80%
• = Target met at 80% or above
|
Plan & Assess |
0%• |
Program Budget: $739,477 |
Program Staff: 30.00 |
|
Target |
Actual Achieved |
% of Targets Met |
Number of Policies Adopted |
4 |
0 |
0% • |
No State Board Considerations Provided |
|
GAMA |
100%• |
Program Budget: $11,326,394 |
Program Staff: 15.50 |
|
Target |
Actual Achieved |
% of Targets Met |
Number of Wells Sampled |
100 |
145 |
145% • |
Number of GW Reports Published |
5 |
11 |
220% • |
No State Board Considerations Adopted |
|
Regulate |
100%• |
Program Budget: $11,798,338 |
Program Staff: 73.10 |
|
Target |
Actual Achieved |
% of Targets Met |
Number of General WDRs Updated (Adopted or Amended) |
1 |
1 |
100% • |
Number of NPDES Permits Adopted |
2 |
6 |
300% • |
No State Board Considerations Provided |
|
Enforcement |
50%• |
Program Budget: $1,428,292 |
Program Staff: 10.40 |
|
Target |
Actual Achieved |
% of Targets Met |
No. of File Reviews for Government-owned and/or Operated UST Facilities |
150 |
200 |
133% • |
No. of Inspections for Government-owned and/or Operated UST Facilities |
40 |
21 |
53% • |
No. of Enforcement Actions for Government-owned and/or Operated UST Facilities |
10 |
5 |
50% • |
Number of CAO and ACL Actions Receiving Technical Support and Assistance From Office of Enforcement |
12 |
31 |
258% • |
Facilities with Over $12,000 in MMPs (4 or More Violations) Not Assessed within 18 Months of Accrual |
0 |
0 |
N/A• |
|
|
Cleanup |
50%• |
Program Budget: $18,996,858 |
Program Staff: 38.40 |
|
Target |
Actual Achieved |
% of Targets Met |
Underground Storage Tanks 5 Year Reviews Completed |
500 |
315 |
63% • |
UST Sites Closed with Claim Closure |
475 |
479 |
101% • |
No State Board Considerations Provided |
|
Fund |
100%• |
Program Budget: $15,421,909 |
Program Staff: 129.70 |
|
Target |
Actual Achieved |
% of Targets Met |
UST Fund Income to Expenditure Ratio |
1 to 1.05 |
1 to 0.01 |
100% • |
UST Fund Overhead Rate |
<10% |
<4% |
100% • |
% of State Revolving Fund Loans Processed in Less than 9 Months |
95% |
85% |
89% • |
% of State Revolving Fund Disbursements Processed in Less than 30 Days |
100% |
87% |
87% • |
No State Board Considerations Provided |
|
Allocate (Water Rights) |
55%• |
Program Budget: $12,796,729 |
Program Staff: 107.30 |
|
Target |
Actual Achieved |
% of Targets Met |
Water Rights Temporary Urgency Permits Issued |
1 |
2 |
200% • |
Water Rights Permits Issued |
26 |
16 |
62% • |
FERC Project Certifications Issued |
10 |
6 |
60% • |
Non_FERC Project Certifications Issued |
6 |
2 |
33% • |
Resolve License Issues for Existing Permits |
20 |
5 |
25% • |
Water Rights Petitions Issued |
40 |
89 |
223% • |
% New or Amended Water Rights Issued with Conditions to Protect Public Trust Resources |
100 |
100 |
100% • |
Enforcement Cases against permit and license holders for non-compliance with instream flow protection terms |
5 |
0 |
0% • |
Enforcement Cases against unauthorized diversions or violations in watersheds with high-resource values |
10 |
28 |
280% • |
Enforcement Cases against water right holders for failure to file statements or online water use reports |
50 |
44 |
88% • |
% Review new permits for compliance within 6 months of issuance |
100 |
89 |
89% • |
Supplemental information regarding permit and license targets: Due to the 2014 Drought, Permitting staff expedited processing of numerous drought related urgency petitions, as reflected in the higher number of petitions completed than targeted. This emphasis on drought petitions reduced availability for routine permit and license processing, as shown in decreased permits and licenses issued. |
|
RESOURCES (INPUTS)
State Board |
FY 13-14 Budget ($) |
Staff (PY) |
%Fees/Taxes Penalties |
%Federal |
%General Fund/Other |
%Bonds |
STATE BOARD EXPLANATIONS
State Board explanations provided in tables above under each program section.
.