Delta Flow Criteria

Exhibits Submitted for the Informational Proceeding of March 22, 2010

Sacramento Valley Water Users (Yuba County Water Agency; Browns Valley Irrigation District; the City of Folsom; the City of Roseville; and San Juan Water District)

• Written Summary
• Exhibit Identification List
• Witness Identification List
• Statement of Qualifications
  • Walter Bourez
  • Daniel Easton
• Written Testimonies
  • Walter Bourez
• Other Exhibits
  • Exhibit 4 - Graph, D-1641 Delta Outflows, Average Monthly by Water-Year Type for 1922-2003
  • Exhibit 5 - Graph, Biological Opinion’s Delta Outflows, Average Monthly Water-Year Type for 1922-2003
  • Exhibit 6 - Graph, Delta Outflows, Difference Between Biological Opinion’s and D-1641 Average Monthly Difference by Water-Year Type for 1922-2003
  • Exhibit 7 - Graph, Biological Opinion’s Delta Outflow Increases Over D-1641, Average Annual Difference by Water-Year Type for 1922-2003
  • Exhibit 8 - Graph, Shasta Carryover Storage, D-1641 and Biological Opinion’s
  • Exhibit 9 - Graph, Shasta Carryover Storage, D-1641 and Biological Opinion’s
  • Exhibit 10 - Graph, Oroville Carryover Storage, D-1641 and Biological Opinion’s
  • Exhibit 11 - Graph, Oroville Carryover Storage, D-1641 and Biological Opinion’s
  • Exhibit 12 - Graph, Folsom Carryover Storage, D-1641 and Biological Opinion’s
  • Exhibit 13 - Graph, Folsom Carryover Storage, D-1641 and Biological Opinion’s
  • Exhibit 14 - Graph, Sacramento River Below Keswick, Difference Between Biological Opinion’s and D-1641, Average Monthly Difference by Water-Year Type for 1922-2003
  • Exhibit 15 - Graph, Feather River Below Thermalito Afterbay, Difference Between Biological Opinion’s and D-1641 Average Monthly Difference by Water-Year Type for 1922-2003
  • Exhibit 16 - Graph, American River Below Nimbus, Difference Between Biological Opinion’s and D-1641, Average Monthly Difference by Water-Year Type for 1922-2003
  • Exhibit 17 - Graph, Bay Institute Spring X2 Target, February Through June Average X2 Position
  • Exhibit 18 - Graph, Bay Institute Fall X2 Target, September Through November Average x2 Position
  • Exhibit 19 - Graph, Bay Institute Delta Outflows, Average Monthly by Water-Year Type for 1922-2003
  • Exhibit 20 - Graph, Delta Outflows, Difference Between Bay Institute and Biological Opinion’s, Average Monthly Difference by Water-Year Type for 1922-2003
  • Exhibit 21 - Graph, Bay Institute Delta Outflow Increases Over Biological Opinion’s, Average Annual Difference by Water-Year Type for 1922-2003
  • Exhibit 22 - Graph, Shasta Carryover Storage, Biological Opinion’s and Bay Institute
  • Exhibit 23 - Graph, Shasta Carryover Storage, Biological Opinion’s and Bay Institute
  • Exhibit 24 - Graph, Oroville Carryover Storage, Biological Opinion’s and Bay Institute
  • Exhibit 25 - Graph, Oroville Carryover Storage, Biological Opinion’s and Bay Institute
  • Exhibit 26 - Graph, Folsom Carryover Storage, Biological Opinion’s and Bay Institute
  • Exhibit 27 - Graph, Folsom Carryover Storage, Biological Opinion’s and Bay Institute
  • Exhibit 28 - Graph, Folsom Carryover Storage, Biological Opinion’s and Bay Institute
  • Exhibit 29 - Graph, Feather River Below Thermalito Afterbay, Difference Between and Bay Institute and Biological Opinion’s, Average Monthly Difference by Water-Year Type for 1922- 2003
  • Exhibit 30 - Graph, American River Below Nimbus, Difference Between Bay Institute and Biological Opinion’s, Average Monthly Difference by Water-Year Type 1922-2003
  • Exhibit 31 - Graph, Delta Outflow, UDC1 (Delta Outflow Target), Average Monthly Difference by Water-Year Type for 1922-2003
  • Exhibit 32 - Graph, Delta Outflow, Difference Between UCD1 (Delta Outflow Target), and Biological Opinion’s Average Monthly Difference by Water-Year Type for 1922-2003
  • Exhibit 33 - Graph, Delta Outflow, UCD1 Increases over Biological Opinions, Average Monthly Difference by Water-Year Type for 1922-2003
  • Exhibit 34 - Graph, Shasta Carryover Storage, Biological Opinion’s and UCD1 (Delta Outflow Target)
  • Exhibit 35 - Graph, Shasta Carryover Storage, Biological Opinion’s and UCD1 (Delta Outflow Target)
  • Exhibit 36 - Graph, Oroville Carryover Storage, Biological Opinion’s and UCD1 (Delta Outflow Target)
  • Exhibit 37 - Graph, Oroville Carryover Storage, Biological Opinion’s and UCD1 (Delta Outflow Target)
  • Exhibit 38 - Graph, Folsom Carryover Storage, Biological Opinion’s and UCD1 (Delta Outflow Target)
  • Exhibit 39 - Graph, Folsom Carryover Storage, Biological Opinion’s and UCD1 (Delta Outflow Target)
  • Exhibit 40 - Graph, Sacramento River Below Keswick, Difference Between and UCD1 and Biological Opinion’s, Average Monthly Difference by Water-Year Type for 1922-2003
  • Exhibit 41 - Graph, Feather River Below Thermalito Afterbay, Difference Between and UCD1 and Biological Opinion’s, Average Monthly Difference by Water-Year Type for 1922-2003
  • Exhibit 42 - Graph, American River Below Nimbus, Difference Between and UCD1 and Biological Opinion’s, Average Monthly Difference by Water-Year Type for 1922-2003
  • Exhibit 43 - Graph, Sacramento River Inflow to Delta, Difference Between UCD2 (Sacramento River Targets) and Biological Opinion’s, Average Monthly Difference by Water-Year Type for 1922-2003
  • Exhibit 44 - Graph, Sacramento River Flow to Yolo Bypass, Difference Between UCD2 (Sacramento River Targets) and Biological Opinion’s, Average Monthly Difference by Water-Year Type for 1922-2003
  • Exhibit 45 - Graph, Delta Outflow, Difference Between and UCD2 (Sacramento River Targets) and Biological Opinion’s, Average Monthly Difference by Water-Year Type for 1922-2003
  • Exhibit 46 - Graph, UCD2 (Sacramento River Targets) Delta Outflow Increases Over Biological Opinion, Average Monthly Difference by Water-Year Type for 1922-2003
  • Exhibit 47 - Graph, Shasta Carryover Storage, Biological Opinion’s and UCD2 (Sacramento River Targets)
  • Exhibit 48 - Graph, Shasta Carryover Storage, Biological Opinion’s and UCD2 (Sacramento River Targets)
  • Exhibit 49 - Graph, Oroville Carryover Storage, Biological Opinion’s and UCD2 (Sacramento River Targets)
  • Exhibit 50 - Graph, Oroville Carryover Storage, Biological Opinion’s and UCD2 (Sacramento River Targets)
  • Exhibit 51 - Graph, Folsom Carryover Storage, Biological Opinion’s and UCD2 (Sacramento River Targets)
  • Exhibit 52 - Graph, Folsom Carryover Storage, Biological Opinion’s and UCD2 (Sacramento River Targets)
  • Exhibit 53 - Graph, Sacramento River Below Keswick, Difference Between UCD2 (Sacramento River Targets) and Biological Opinion’s, Average Monthly Difference by Water-Year Type for 1922-2003
  • Exhibit 54 - Graph, Feather River Below Thermalito Afterbay, Difference Between UCD2 (Sacramento River Targets) and Biological Opinion’s, Average Monthly Difference by Water-Year Type for 1922-2003
  • Exhibit 55 - Graph, American River Nimbus, Difference Between UCD2 (Sacramento River Targets) and Biological Opinion’s, Average Monthly Difference by Water-Year Type for 1922-2003
  • Exhibit 56 - Graph, Sacramento Valley Unimpaired Outflows
  • Exhibit 57 - Graph, San Joaquin Valley Unimpaired Outflows
  • Exhibit 58 - Graph, Net Delta Unimpaired Outflows
  • Exhibit 59 - Document by The Bay Institute: Targets for Protection of the Delta Ecosystem as an Integral Part of a Health Estuary
  • Exhibit 60 - January 12, 2010 draft paper: “On Developing Prescriptions for Freshwater Flows to Sustain Desirable Fishes in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta” by William E. Fleenor, William A. Bennett, Peter B. Moyle, and Jay R. Lund of the Delta Solutions Program, Center for Watershed Sciences, University of California - Davis

Return to Written Summaries, Exhibits, and Written Testimony Index

(Updated 3/2/10)